What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

So I'm working on a 37 man onslaught (1 Viewer)

J

jwvdcw

Footballguy
Put this together tonight...total rough draft here. Tried to go heavy on the Perkinisms.............

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 33 33 33 33 3 3 3 3 33 33 3 3 33 3 3 33 33 33 3 3 3 3 37

5

2

4 13

37

3

3 3 3 1

36

10 11 19

17 32 18 14 13 16 12 11 10 10 9 9 9 15 35 34

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 11 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 33 33 3 3 3 3 3 33

22

21 19 20 21 21

31

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 33 33 33 33

29 27 28 25

26

23 23 24

22 30

 
TannerBoyle said:
"Working"? Damn. That looks finished to me. Very nice slaught. Heavy on the Perks is right but you didn't lay it on too thick. Sweet balance with that and the Kyoto bend especially around the mids. :thumbup:
Click to expand...
It's spelled "Kiyoto." You're thinking of that treaty.
 
A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.

 
Dante Hicks: You said you only had sex with three different guys; you never mentioned him!

Veronica Loughran: Because I never HAD sex with him.

Dante Hicks: You sucked his ####!

Veronica Loughran: We went out a few times. We never had sex but we fooled around.

Dante Hicks: Oh my God, WHY did you tell me you only had sex with three different guys?

Veronica Loughran: Because I DID only have sex with three different guys; that doesn't mean I didn't just go with people.

Dante Hicks: Oh my God, I feel so nauseous!

Veronica Loughran: I'm sorry, Dante, I thought you understood!

Dante Hicks: I did understand! I understood that you had sex with three different guys and that's all you said!

Veronica Loughran: Please calm down.

Dante Hicks: How many?

Veronica Loughran: Dante...

Dante Hicks: How many ##### have you sucked?

Veronica Loughran: Let it go!

Dante Hicks: How many?

Veronica Loughran: All right, shut up a second and I'll tell you! Jesus! I didn't freak out like this when you told me how many girls you ####ed!

Dante Hicks: This is different, this is important. How many?

[long pause as customer buys something]

Dante Hicks: Well?

Veronica Loughran: Something like... 36.

Dante Hicks: What? Something like 36?

Veronica Loughran: Lower your voice.

Dante Hicks: Wait a minute, what is that anyway, something like 36? Does that INCLUDE me?

Veronica Loughran: Ummm... 37.

Dante Hicks: I'm 37?

 
jwvdcw said:
Put this together tonight...total rough draft here. Tried to go heavy on the Perkinisms.............

3 3 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 33 33 33 33 3 3 3 3 33 33 3 3 33 3 3 33 33 33 3 3 3 3 37

5

2

4 13 13 13

37

3

3 3 3 1

36

10 11 19

17 32 18 14 13 16 12 11 10 10 9 9 9 15 35 34

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 11 11 3 3 21 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 33 33 3 33 3 3 3 33

22

21 19 20 21 21 25 25

31

3 3 3 31 3 3 3 3 33 3 3 3 3 33 33 33 33

29 27

26

23 23 24

22 30
Click to expand...
If by "rough draft" what you really mean is "total rip off from the Düsseldorf theorem," then yes, I totally agree with you. You're going to get caught up with the triple-flank errors like in the Arecibo conundrum. I've tried to make some changes above, but really, as people have said, this is not a good way to go about the onslaught.Dickey Moe was right on with the Hovenfeld in line 11. He knows his stuff.

 
Random said:
A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.
Click to expand...
XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.

 
Please explain how this differs substantially from nutting on a guy's back as he pistons his crank in your girl's mouth.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
phrozen said:
Random said:
A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.
Click to expand...
XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.
Click to expand...
I remember that classic match vividly. The over/under was 36 for the onslaughts in that match, and I put down $1,000 on the over to barely cover by one onslaught. It was a good day for me and Costica.
 
phrozen said:
Random said:
A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.
Click to expand...
XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.
Click to expand...
Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.
 
3MTA3 said:
phrozen said:
Random said:
A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.
Click to expand...
XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.
Click to expand...
Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.
Click to expand...
:goodposting: It was not a TRUE 37. Trust me, I was there.

 
3MTA3 said:
phrozen said:
Random said:
A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.
Click to expand...
XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.
Click to expand...
Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.
Click to expand...
You could be correct, my details are a little fuzzy of the '98 Romanian Championship. I just remember seeing Eshkanazi for the first time and being blown away at his skills at the allmighty onslaught.I know one thing, us Americans have a lot of catching up to do against Eastern European competition. They are a dominant force in the onslaught world.

 
phrozen said:
3MTA3 said:
phrozen said:
Random said:
A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.
Click to expand...
XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.
Click to expand...
Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.
Click to expand...
You could be correct, my details are a little fuzzy of the '98 Romanian Championship. I just remember seeing Eshkanazi for the first time and being blown away at his skills at the allmighty onslaught.I know one thing, us Americans have a lot of catching up to do against Eastern European competition. They are a dominant force in the onslaught world.
Click to expand...
:goodposting:
 
3MTA3 said:
phrozen said:
3MTA3 said:
phrozen said:
Random said:
A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.
Click to expand...
XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.
Click to expand...
Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.
Click to expand...
You could be correct, my details are a little fuzzy of the '98 Romanian Championship. I just remember seeing Eshkanazi for the first time and being blown away at his skills at the allmighty onslaught.I know one thing, us Americans have a lot of catching up to do against Eastern European competition. They are a dominant force in the onslaught world.
Click to expand...
:goodposting:
Click to expand...
It is still in its infancy in the US. There are a few Highlemoresonian players here though, and they are bound to light things up for us in the next WOC.
 
This thread has all the dynamics to be considered for thread of the year.

Mystery

Intrigue

Random shots

Innerweb convo

and Bob Sacamano

:banned:

 
LogistX: 200

SF

ATL

KC

Miami

Houston

Detroit

CardSharpCook: 3000(2000 owed)

ATL

SF

STL

Miami

Oak

Detroit

Shantanut: 200

Miami

Balt

KC

SF

Cincy

Chicago

jalapenoguy: 600

Atl

Balt

KC

Mia

Oak

SF

kdog: 200

Atl

Balt

KC

Mia

Oak

SF

MyTurn2Raise: 300

Atl

Det

Miami

Oak

Stl

SF

frostbrn: 100

Miami

Atl

Oak

KC

Houston

Baltimore

Jimboozie #1: 250

KC

Chi

Miami

Cincy

NY Giants

Tenn

Jimboozie #2: 250

KC

Chi

Miami

Cincy

Stl

Atl

Teams taken:

Miami: 9

ATL: 7

KC: 7

SF: 6

Oak: 5

Balt: 4

Det: 3

STL: 3

Chicago: 3

Cincy: 3

Houston: 2

Tenn: 1

NYG: 1

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great stuff in here. I ran into William Cragsworth on a train ride up to Berkeley last summer, of all things. He proposed the following opening in the third round of a best of five set*:

543643 999 232434 01

01 01 34354 22

6

6

453

I asked him about the use of consecutive 6's in the 3rd and 4th lines and he winked and just said "That's the secret." I never got more out of him and we moved on to lesser things.

*Edit to add that this would be in tournament play.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Random said:
3MTA3 said:
phrozen said:
Random said:
A 37 man onslaught can NOT be completed without error. It is impossible. 37 is a very unique number for onslaughting. It has been tried before, not in this century, but always ends up Meinerlauckenloughing. My advice is to stop now.

I wish you luck.
Click to expand...
XActually the 37 man onslaught was done in the 1998 Romanian Onslaught Championship match. Costica Eshkenazi completed the 37 man onslaught without error and took home the championship. FYI.
Click to expand...
Are you sure about this? I thought Eshkanazi pulled off the Reisenberg Lapnation which masks the (almost as difficult) 41 man onslaught and makes your opponent believe you're starting out with a 37. I thought he completely fooled Rozkoyev with that one.
Click to expand...
:confused: It was not a TRUE 37. Trust me, I was there.
Click to expand...
He's right it was cheap trick and wasn’t really a 37 man onslaught. Eshkenazi used a simple 13 man onslaught and a 14 man onslaught back to back. He used the rashminov maneuver to link them so technically it wasn't a 37 man onslaught. This would never fly under international onslaught rules.
 
Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16

 
Bucky...I don't want to call you a liar...but this exact onslaught principal was proposed in last year's OOC.

I assume you're disguising it as your own and bringing it here just to start this damned tired debate again.

 
Buckychudd said:
Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16
Click to expand...
Any progress made on the Trovsky maneuver in line 3 is negated by the run of 1s in line 4. You could've gotten by with it had you concluded with a 2 level Willhelm after line 4.

 
yellowdog said:
Buckychudd said:
Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16
Click to expand...
Any progress made on the Trovsky maneuver in line 3 is negated by the run of 1s in line 4. You could've gotten by with it had you concluded with a 2 level Willhelm after line 4.
Click to expand...
He's obviously just baiting you, yellow.

I refuse to believe he posted this on accident.

 
tdoss said:
yellowdog said:
Buckychudd said:
Been working on this one for a loooong time.

37482

234242425998521

1331217 171288 2378192 3198

3241111118889020983

16
Click to expand...
Any progress made on the Trovsky maneuver in line 3 is negated by the run of 1s in line 4. You could've gotten by with it had you concluded with a 2 level Willhelm after line 4.
Click to expand...
He's obviously just baiting you, yellow.

I refuse to believe he posted this on accident.
Click to expand...
didn't even format it correctly.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

kupcho1
The FBG Top 300 Books of All Time (fiction edition) | #2 The Stand by Stephen King | #1 The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien ... it's a wrap
33 34 35
Replies
2K
Views
115K
rockaction
rockaction
kupcho1
The Official FBG Top 70 Fiction Books of All Time - DEADLINE FOR LIST SUBMISSIONS EXTENDED TO MARCH 30, 2025
3 4 5
Replies
232
Views
7K
kupcho1
kupcho1
titusbramble
  • Poll Poll
2026 FIFA World Cup megathread
Replies
33
Views
605
Jayrod
Jayrod

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top