What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty Qb #1 ranking (1 Viewer)

These are dynasty Qb rankings for 2007

  • Carson Palmer

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Peyton Manning

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tom Brady

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Drew Brees

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Donovan McNabb

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Eli Manning

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ben Roethlisberger

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Phillip Rivers

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mark Bulger

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Matt Hasselbeck

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Biabreakable

Footballguy
These are consensus dynasty rankings for year 2007

If you vote other, please specify.

Also, please comment on your vote, and list any player that should be nominated for the next round.

 
I went Palmer. Coming into this season I had Peyton Manning first because Palmer was coming off injury and had only 1 good season. I have seen enough to believe he will be solid for several years. I believe Peyton and Palmer are very close from a dynasty standpoint now and I could see arguments for both as the cream of the crop.

 
"Other."

The contrarian in me votes Tony Romo.
TO will be 34 next year and Glenn will be 33. He's going to need some new blood to throw to very soon.I'll go with Palmer as well. He's 3 years younger than Peyton and I think will likely put up similar (although likely less) production to Manning over the next 3 seasons. After that point I expect Manning's age to start catching up to him.

 
Tough Choice, but i went with Carson.

Both will put up similar stats, and Carson's a few years younger, so i'll give him the nod. This is 1 and 1b

 
i went donovan. if the Eagles ever get a top WR in the offense again, he will positively explode. and without one, he's still easily top 3. which means his upside is greater than manning, who i think at best stays flat from year to year. injuries notwithstanding, obviously.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dont know how you cant still go with Manning, given his past production and non existant injury history.

 
i went donovan. if the Eagles ever get a top WR in the offense again, he will positively explode. and without one, he's still easily top 3. which means his upside is greater than manning, who i think at best stays flat from year to year. injuries notwithstanding, obviously.
injuries are a key consideration when evaluating this topic.
 
i went donovan. if the Eagles ever get a top WR in the offense again, he will positively explode. and without one, he's still easily top 3. which means his upside is greater than manning, who i think at best stays flat from year to year. injuries notwithstanding, obviously.
injuries are a key consideration when evaluating this topic.
agreed. mcnabb's upside is roughly commensurate with his injury risk. given that he had the same numbers as manning before he got hurt, and this was without a true #1 WR, i think they're a dead heat. do you take the upside, or the safe play? depends on the person, i guess. i'm a gambler :)
 
Went with Rivers. Manning is my second choice but being dynasty, Manning is in his 9th year.
seriously? QBs of his caliber play for 13 years or more, there's no indication that Peyton is slowing down (although his best WR may be). I'll take 4 years of Peyton, no contest.Carson, I can understand taking ahead. Nobody else is close.
 
Manning 1a

Palmer 1b

Another year like this one & Brees could be thrown into the mix. He has opened my eyes this year.

 
I say Brees. Why not. He has two of the most talented rookies to throw to for years. Devery Henderson is coming around and very young. Another year in Payton's system could actually help him.

He is also not getting hit. The Saints lead the league in the least sacks given up, so durability should not be a problem. The shoulder looks good to me.

 
i went donovan. if the Eagles ever get a top WR in the offense again, he will positively explode. and without one, he's still easily top 3. which means his upside is greater than manning, who i think at best stays flat from year to year. injuries notwithstanding, obviously.
injuries are a key consideration when evaluating this topic.
agreed. mcnabb's upside is roughly commensurate with his injury risk. given that he had the same numbers as manning before he got hurt, and this was without a true #1 WR, i think they're a dead heat. do you take the upside, or the safe play? depends on the person, i guess. i'm a gambler :)
I take the safe play and the upside play - Manning. Not even a contest considering both are the same age and one is injury prone. I assume you are fishing but Ill bite regardless.Seasons over 4000 yards passing: Peyton 6 McNabb 0Seasons with more then 25 combined TDs: Peyton 8 McNabb 316 Game Seasons: Peyton 8 Donovan 3How can you possibly see Donovan with more upside?
 
I say Brees. Why not. He has two of the most talented rookies to throw to for years. Devery Henderson is coming around and very young. Another year in Payton's system could actually help him. He is also not getting hit. The Saints lead the league in the least sacks given up, so durability should not be a problem. The shoulder looks good to me.
:goodposting: What ATC1 said! :thumbup:
 
I went Palmer. Coming into this season I had Peyton Manning first because Palmer was coming off injury and had only 1 good season. I have seen enough to believe he will be solid for several years. I believe Peyton and Palmer are very close from a dynasty standpoint now and I could see arguments for both as the cream of the crop.
:goodposting: I voted for Palmer based on this reasoning.
 
i went donovan. if the Eagles ever get a top WR in the offense again, he will positively explode. and without one, he's still easily top 3. which means his upside is greater than manning, who i think at best stays flat from year to year. injuries notwithstanding, obviously.
injuries are a key consideration when evaluating this topic.
agreed. mcnabb's upside is roughly commensurate with his injury risk. given that he had the same numbers as manning before he got hurt, and this was without a true #1 WR, i think they're a dead heat. do you take the upside, or the safe play? depends on the person, i guess. i'm a gambler :)
I take the safe play and the upside play - Manning. Not even a contest considering both are the same age and one is injury prone. I assume you are fishing but Ill bite regardless.Seasons over 4000 yards passing: Peyton 6 McNabb 0Seasons with more then 25 combined TDs: Peyton 8 McNabb 316 Game Seasons: Peyton 8 Donovan 3How can you possibly see Donovan with more upside?
not fishing, unless you consider my assumption that Philly will do what they can to get a top WR in the door. that was the upside my rather brief analysis was based on. he was neck-and-neck with manning with the likes of Reggie Brown and LJ Smith. Reggie brown enters his 3rd year next year, and should become a top WR, and i'd expect them to try and sign someone since no one can depend on Stallworth evidently. manning has no upside, in my opinion. where are you deriving this idea from?? he's a flat play if i ever saw one....
 
i went donovan. if the Eagles ever get a top WR in the offense again, he will positively explode. and without one, he's still easily top 3. which means his upside is greater than manning, who i think at best stays flat from year to year. injuries notwithstanding, obviously.
injuries are a key consideration when evaluating this topic.
agreed. mcnabb's upside is roughly commensurate with his injury risk. given that he had the same numbers as manning before he got hurt, and this was without a true #1 WR, i think they're a dead heat. do you take the upside, or the safe play? depends on the person, i guess. i'm a gambler :)
I take the safe play and the upside play - Manning. Not even a contest considering both are the same age and one is injury prone. I assume you are fishing but Ill bite regardless.Seasons over 4000 yards passing: Peyton 6 McNabb 0Seasons with more then 25 combined TDs: Peyton 8 McNabb 316 Game Seasons: Peyton 8 Donovan 3How can you possibly see Donovan with more upside?
not fishing, unless you consider my assumption that Philly will do what they can to get a top WR in the door. that was the upside my rather brief analysis was based on. he was neck-and-neck with manning with the likes of Reggie Brown and LJ Smith. Reggie brown enters his 3rd year next year, and should become a top WR, and i'd expect them to try and sign someone since no one can depend on Stallworth evidently. manning has no upside, in my opinion. where are you deriving this idea from?? he's a flat play if i ever saw one....
:loco: so because Mcnabbs was having his best year in your mind before he got hurt, and that best year is comparable to Mannings 2006 season which is average for him, you think Mcnabb has more upside. Gotcha.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Theres been some good discussion here. Lets keep that up in threads ahead. I encourage you all to lobby for your vote by providing the reasoning behind it.

I think you can make a good argument for a lot of these players when all of them are still available. But it was very clear that the majority prefer Peyton Manning. And with good reason I think. No other Qb has been so solid as he has for such a long time. It's important to keep in mind that good Qbs last into thier mid 30s. Waren Moon was still an elite Qb even in his 40s. A Qb with a quick release like Manning has avoids hits and thus avoids injury. That is another thing that is important and valuable. For several years there it was Culpepper and Manning were at the top of Qb rankings. Running Qbs do have an advantage if they are also good passers. But they are more of an injury risk also. I am not even listing Culpepper yet. Just somthing to keep in mind when looking at things from a dynasty perspective. A elite Qb that can stay healthy can lead your team for a decade.

Peyton Manning:

+---------------------------------------+-----------------+

| Passing | Rushing |

+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+

| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |

+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+

| 1998 ind | 16 | 326 575 56.7 3739 6.5 26 28 | 15 62 0 |

| 1999 ind | 16 | 331 533 62.1 4135 7.8 26 15 | 35 73 2 |

| 2000 ind | 16 | 357 571 62.5 4413 7.7 33 15 | 37 116 1 |

| 2001 ind | 16 | 343 547 62.7 4131 7.6 26 23 | 35 157 4 |

| 2002 ind | 16 | 392 591 66.3 4200 7.1 27 19 | 38 148 2 |

| 2003 ind | 16 | 379 566 67.0 4267 7.5 29 10 | 28 26 0 |

| 2004 ind | 16 | 336 497 67.6 4557 9.2 49 10 | 25 38 0 |

| 2005 ind | 16 | 305 453 67.3 3747 8.3 28 10 | 33 45 0 |

| 2006 ind | 11 | 244 379 64.4 2964 7.8 21 6 | 17 10 2 |

+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+

| TOTAL | 139 | 3013 4712 63.9 36153 7.7 265 136 | 263 675 11 |

+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+
Peyton Manning is 30 years old now. But he is so good and never gets injured. His uniform stays pretty clean almost all the time. I think he could still be playing at this level for another 10 years honestly before age finaly catches up with him. He is a machine. A total student of the game. Born and bred to be a NFL Qb. I don't see him ever losing passion for the game. I like a lot of these other guys too. But if I can have any Qb Peyton is definitly my choice. Keep in mind that no answer is wrong when it comes to this. We all have different ideas and philosophies in how we play dynasty and how we value players. If you think differently than the majority than so be it. Thats another thing that is useful about these consensus rankings. Is figuring out how the majority values players and based off of that how we can use it to our advantage.

Thanks everyone for participating in this. We can get some great information for our leagues by pooling our collective knowledge together on this.

Now who is Qb #2?

Please vote here: http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...=291846&st=

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top