What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Chad Jackson (1 Viewer)

JetMaxx

Footballguy
He posted amazing pre-draft work out numbers and seems to have the measureables to be a star. However, I haven't heard much about his development in NE this year. Any NE homers able to check in with some insight? Any rumblings as to how BB and staff feel about his progress?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Guess it is hard to lable any NE WR a stud due to the way Brady spreads the ball. C Jack has great potential but will he get the targets needed to become that stud, I guess only time will tell.

 
If he doesn't work on his hands in the offseason his feet are going to be out of a job within 2 years......

Man, that is so tough to say about a Gator too........other than Travis Taylor, that is. :P :bag:

 
The first impressions of Jackson in mini and training camps were very impressive. There were a couple of threads on that here in the Pool. However, he then sustained a hamstring injury which lingered through camp and the early part of the season. Until recently, I believe he had played in only a handful of games all year.

Hope it helps. I think he's a nice player to keep an eye on although I think he'd have to develop into a very good WR before he'd put up impressive fantasy stats consistently because the Pats DO spread the ball around plenty.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it's still too soon to tell. Right now he's been getting about 2 to 4 chances per game and he's had some good and bad moments with those opportunities. He's shown his speed. Hasn't really shown his good hands. His route running hasn't been all that sharp and most of the times he's been thrown to were on the go route where he just has to outrun the defender (this is what the Pat's used to use Bethel Johnson for because he was very fast but not a good route runner either).

He has not really progressed as much as I would have liked. I didn't expect him to do much earlier in the season but I would have liked to see him earn more chances as the season went on - kind of similar to the way that Santonio Holmes has for the Steelers. He has progressed some, but Holmes is easily getting twice as many touches right now and seems to have adapted to the pro game much faster.

Looking at all the Pat's WR's, I'd say that Caldwell has really developed the most chemistry with Brady. Troy Brown is about the same, but with him playing defense right now he just can't be used as much in the offense too. Looking to next year I have a hard time seeing Brown still being here. After that there seems to be a 3-way rotation between Gabriel, Jackson and Gaffney. Gabriel had a lot of touches early in the year but lately has gotten into the dog house and doesn't get on the field much. Gaffney and Jackson get about equal time, even though Gaffney just joined the team a few weeks ago. It isn't clear which one of these three will emerge as the solid #2 the Pat's are looking for.

I could easily see the Pat's go after a big-name WR in the offseason and move Caldwell to the #2. Or perhaps Jackson, Gabriel or Gaffney will develop. Right now it's far from obvious who it will be.

 
generally where would you guys rank him if he was being drafted next to this years rookie draft, about 1.8?

 
Gabriel had a lot of touches early in the year but lately has gotten into the dog house and doesn't get on the field much. I could easily see the Pat's go after a big-name WR in the offseason and move Caldwell to the #2. Or perhaps Jackson, Gabriel or Gaffney will develop. Right now it's far from obvious who it will be.
Gabriel was cut by the Patriots and went back to Oakland.
 
Gabriel had a lot of touches early in the year but lately has gotten into the dog house and doesn't get on the field much. I could easily see the Pat's go after a big-name WR in the offseason and move Caldwell to the #2. Or perhaps Jackson, Gabriel or Gaffney will develop. Right now it's far from obvious who it will be.
Gabriel was cut by the Patriots and went back to Oakland.
His post was prior to this.
 
Gabriel had a lot of touches early in the year but lately has gotten into the dog house and doesn't get on the field much. I could easily see the Pat's go after a big-name WR in the offseason and move Caldwell to the #2. Or perhaps Jackson, Gabriel or Gaffney will develop. Right now it's far from obvious who it will be.
Gabriel was cut by the Patriots and went back to Oakland.
His post was prior to this.
D'oh. True
 
So what is the verdict on Jackson after his rookie campaign. I think it remains as Steelnation said, it's going to come down to targets if can also bring his game along.

Two pretty big if's.

 
I just traded away Chad Jackson, 1.10 and 2.6 rookie picks in a dynasty league for 1.3 (Calvin Johnson) and 2.3 rookie picks. I'm happy. :popcorn:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just traded away Chad Jackson, 1.10 and 2.6 rookie picks in a dynasty league for 1.3 (Calvin Johnson) and 2.3 rookie picks. I'm happy. :lmao:
Sounds like a pretty sweet deal. I just don't think Jackson has the upside. At this point Johnson's upside is a crapshoot but NE is one of the worst situations for a WR. Talent-wise I think Johnson is quite a ways ahead of Jackson as well.
 
So what is the verdict on Jackson after his rookie campaign. I think it remains as Steelnation said, it's going to come down to targets if can also bring his game along.

Two pretty big if's.
The problem with Jackson is no one really knows what his issues were this year although there's plenty of speculation. The Pats have never come out and said what exactly held him back. Locally there have been reports that the injury which kept him out all of camp was nagging throughout the year. There are also reports that he couldn't pick up the offense as well as there being major concerns about his maturity. The issue could be one of these things or my guess is it's a combination of all of them.Here's the bottomline with Jackson. As soon as you see him on the field you can see he has physical tools. That's very apparent. Yet, the Pats were hurting unbelievably at WR this year and had so little faith/trust in him that he was an afterthought. It wasn't like he was playing behind Harrison and Wayne and they could bring him along slowly. The Pats could have used any help they could get at WR and Jackson's number was hardly called outside of a few plays were they tried to use his speed on deep routes. That's not very encouraging.

Since the Pats are so tight-lipped I don't think we'll find out the real story here. The best bet is to watch what the Pats add to their WR corps this year. If there are major upgrades that could be a sign that they are concerned about Jackson's development. If they don't do anything major that could be a sign that they expect a big upgrade from him for 07. Either way it's a guessing game because there's not much to go on by his 06 performance.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since the Pats are so tight-lipped I don't think we'll find out the real story here. The best bet is to watch what the Pats add to their WR corps this year. If there are major upgrades that could be a sign that they are concerned about Jackson's development. If they don't do anything major that could be a sign that they expect a big upgrade from him for 07. Either way it's a guessing game because there's not much to go on by his 06 performance.
Ill be watching how they use their first round picks very closely to infer how Jackson is doing. With the deep WR class, surely theyll get a shot one of Bowe/Meachem/Rice/Jarrett/Ginn when their picks come up. I basically agree with the sum of the posts here - Jackson showed in his limited time that his physical tools were impressive, but he also showed that he's raw and has a lot of work to do. His involvement was minimal despite the Pats basically relying on retreads by the end of the year at the WR position, and while other rookie WRs were winning playing time away from WRs that aren't retreads. Whatever is holding Jackson back could be mental, physical or both, but we won't know because the Pats are just that way about internal affairs.I probably wouldnt rank him higher than WR4 out of last year's class right now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Whatever happened to the 3-year window afforded to WRs?

You guys who want to throw dirt on a rookie WR who didn't have a Randy Moss/Anquan Boldin freshman year are hilarous.

 
Whatever happened to the 3-year window afforded to WRs?You guys who want to throw dirt on a rookie WR who didn't have a Randy Moss/Anquan Boldin freshman year are hilarous.
I don't see people burying Jackson, just saying that his first year was a flop compared to the other rookie WRs, and that he's fallen behind guys drafted after him.The three year window is still in effect, but that doesnt mean that we cant draw informed conclusions based on how their first year went. Do you think we should just ignore the first two years of Troy Williamson's career? Mike Williams? Guys don't have to have Moss/Boldin rookie years, but they should at least be going forward in their development.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One thing I haven't seen mentioned here that is holding Jackson back is the type of offense New England runs. Brady has an outstanding OL who gives him great protection, so he has time to find the open receiver. He spreads the ball all over the field and doesn't lock in on any 1 receiver, so IMO New England will not produce any real stud WR's. Sure there will be 60-70 catch WR's but I don't think we'll see any 80-90 catch WR's there. And 7-8 TD's by a WR in New England is a bonanza!! :rolleyes:

 
I wouldnt call him a stud..But i think he will be a top 15-20 WR. Making him a #2 or 3 FF WR. He will be limited by NE..

 
cscmtp said:
I just traded away Chad Jackson, 1.10 and 2.6 rookie picks in a dynasty league for 1.3 (Calvin Johnson) and 2.3 rookie picks. I'm happy. :)
Doubt you get CJohnson at 1.03, unless the 1.02 guy lives under a rock. :2cents:
 
cscmtp said:
I just traded away Chad Jackson, 1.10 and 2.6 rookie picks in a dynasty league for 1.3 (Calvin Johnson) and 2.3 rookie picks. I'm happy. :)
Doubt you get CJohnson at 1.03, unless the 1.02 guy lives under a rock. :2cents:
As good as Calvin Johnson is/can be, the general consensus has Marshawn Lynch as the #2 dynasty pick this year.That is, in February of this year... things change!

 
Whatever happened to the 3-year window afforded to WRs?

You guys who want to throw dirt on a rookie WR who didn't have a Randy Moss/Anquan Boldin freshman year are hilarous.
I don't see people burying Jackson, just saying that his first year was a flop compared to the other rookie WRs, and that he's fallen behind guys drafted after him.The three year window is still in effect, but that doesnt mean that we cant draw informed conclusions based on how their first year went. Do you think we should just ignore the first two years of Troy Williamson's career? Mike Williams? Guys don't have to have Moss/Boldin rookie years, but they should at least be going forward in their development.
Deion Branch's Rookie Year:Games Played: 13

Games Started: 7

Receptions: 43

Yards: 489

Ave: 11.4

Long: 49

TDs: 2

Chad Jackson's Rookie Year:

Games Played: 12

Games Started: 1

Receptions: 13

Yards: 152

Ave: 11.7

Long: 35

TDs: 3

If Chad Jackson starts 6 more games, he surpasses Branch's numbers easily. Seems he's got the talent, but does he have the head? Once he earns BBs trust and starts lining up opposite Caldwell, I think we'll see his numbers grow by leaps and bounds.

 
I know it was only his rookie year, but he really didn't move up the depth chart on what could be the worst Wide Receivers corps in recent memory. Caldwell looked good at times, but when he is considered your best wide receiver than there is something wrong. I'm sure Belichek was disappointed that he spent a first round pick on a Wide Receiver, and than got very little from that receiver. I would have to think that the Patriots will end up with a Jerry Porter type this offseason and Jackson will have to work extra hard to be a big part next season.

 
I know it was only his rookie year, but he really didn't move up the depth chart on what could be the worst Wide Receivers corps in recent memory. Caldwell looked good at times, but when he is considered your best wide receiver than there is something wrong. I'm sure Belichek was disappointed that he spent a first round pick on a Wide Receiver, and than got very little from that receiver. I would have to think that the Patriots will end up with a Jerry Porter type this offseason and Jackson will have to work extra hard to be a big part next season.
2nd rounder...
 
Do you think we should just ignore the first two years of Troy Williamson's career? Mike Williams?
Maybe you should check out the first 3-4 years of Michael Irvin, Cris Carter, Joe Horn, and Jimmy Smith for some perspective. Or have a look at Chad Johnson, Reggie Wayne and Javon Walkers rookie years for some more perspective.
 
I believe it's an excellent time to buy low on Jackson if you can get him on the cheap.
:bag: He and LenDale White are two of my top buy low guys right now. Jackson has a good chance to eventually become New England's #1 WR.
 
I disagree with those who think Jackson's value is limited because New England spreads the ball around. In the past 5-6 years, New England has never had an elite receiver. Wouldn't you spread the ball around if Deion Branch, David Givens, Troy Brown, and Reche Caldwell were your best options? Those guys are all NFL WR2's at best.

If Jackson has the talent of a WR1 then I believe he can put up WR1 numbers. The lack of production from previous Patriot WRs is virtually irrelevant. Good coaches tailor their teams around their talent. If Jackson is more talented than Branch, Givens, Brown, and Caldwell, then I think he'll play a bigger role in the offense than those guys did.

 
If he doesn't work on his hands in the offseason his feet are going to be out of a job within 2 years......

Man, that is so tough to say about a Gator too........other than Travis Taylor, that is. :shrug: :goodposting:
Why is there a conception that Jackson has bad hands?
 
I disagree with those who think Jackson's value is limited because New England spreads the ball around. In the past 5-6 years, New England has never had an elite receiver. Wouldn't you spread the ball around if Deion Branch, David Givens, Troy Brown, and Reche Caldwell were your best options? Those guys are all NFL WR2's at best. If Jackson has the talent of a WR1 then I believe he can put up WR1 numbers. The lack of production from previous Patriot WRs is virtually irrelevant. Good coaches tailor their teams around their talent. If Jackson is more talented than Branch, Givens, Brown, and Caldwell, then I think he'll play a bigger role in the offense than those guys did.
:goodposting:
 
I disagree with those who think Jackson's value is limited because New England spreads the ball around. In the past 5-6 years, New England has never had an elite receiver. Wouldn't you spread the ball around if Deion Branch, David Givens, Troy Brown, and Reche Caldwell were your best options? Those guys are all NFL WR2's at best. If Jackson has the talent of a WR1 then I believe he can put up WR1 numbers. The lack of production from previous Patriot WRs is virtually irrelevant. Good coaches tailor their teams around their talent. If Jackson is more talented than Branch, Givens, Brown, and Caldwell, then I think he'll play a bigger role in the offense than those guys did.
:goodposting:
 
I disagree with those who think Jackson's value is limited because New England spreads the ball around. In the past 5-6 years, New England has never had an elite receiver. Wouldn't you spread the ball around if Deion Branch, David Givens, Troy Brown, and Reche Caldwell were your best options? Those guys are all NFL WR2's at best. If Jackson has the talent of a WR1 then I believe he can put up WR1 numbers. The lack of production from previous Patriot WRs is virtually irrelevant. Good coaches tailor their teams around their talent. If Jackson is more talented than Branch, Givens, Brown, and Caldwell, then I think he'll play a bigger role in the offense than those guys did.
:goodposting: Absoltely right. One thing the Pats have been great at is developing the offense around what they have to work with. If they have found a true stud, #1 WR in Jackson, they'll open up the passing game to bring out those talents.
 
What Jackson needs to work on most is learning the playbook. That's what kept him off the field.

I've seen a clip of Bill Belichick saying to a group of OTs (not verbatim) "If you don't know what you're doing I can't put you in there. It's as simple as that."

 
What Jackson needs to work on most is learning the playbook. That's what kept him off the field.I've seen a clip of Bill Belichick saying to a group of OTs (not verbatim) "If you don't know what you're doing I can't put you in there. It's as simple as that."
:shrug: It doesnt matter how talented he is, if he's not where he's supposed to be, when he's supposed to be there, then it's all for naught.
 
What Jackson needs to work on most is learning the playbook. That's what kept him off the field.
That's easily correctable though...Javon Walker was having some of the same issues his rookie year.Buy Low.
While I agree, I don't see Jackson ever being in the same tier as Walker. Not a true stud, but he'll be a decent WR2 in FF once he learns the playbook and keeps working at it.
 
What Jackson needs to work on most is learning the playbook. That's what kept him off the field.
That's easily correctable though...Javon Walker was having some of the same issues his rookie year.Buy Low.
While I agree, I don't see Jackson ever being in the same tier as Walker. Not a true stud, but he'll be a decent WR2 in FF once he learns the playbook and keeps working at it.
I actually think he has the tools to be a #1. I obviously don't think he'll ever be as good as Walker, I used Javon as an example of a player that can have issues with remembering plays, but later excel.
 
Do you think we should just ignore the first two years of Troy Williamson's career? Mike Williams?
Maybe you should check out the first 3-4 years of Michael Irvin, Cris Carter, Joe Horn, and Jimmy Smith for some perspective. Or have a look at Chad Johnson, Reggie Wayne and Javon Walkers rookie years for some more perspective.
Good point and this is why I hate to draft WR with early 1st round picks in dynasty. Calvin Johnson is being considered at 1.2 in most dynasty leagues...I think it could easily take him 2-3 years to develop in the NFL. I much prefer filling my roster with 5-10 year vets at WR that I know I will get production out of. Lot of WR get drafted high by NFL teams and then they flop.
 
Do you think we should just ignore the first two years of Troy Williamson's career? Mike Williams?
Maybe you should check out the first 3-4 years of Michael Irvin, Cris Carter, Joe Horn, and Jimmy Smith for some perspective. Or have a look at Chad Johnson, Reggie Wayne and Javon Walkers rookie years for some more perspective.
Good point and this is why I hate to draft WR with early 1st round picks in dynasty. Calvin Johnson is being considered at 1.2 in most dynasty leagues...I think it could easily take him 2-3 years to develop in the NFL. I much prefer filling my roster with 5-10 year vets at WR that I know I will get production out of. Lot of WR get drafted high by NFL teams and then they flop.
Drafting a WR that high is certainly a risky proposition.I drafted Keyshawn as a rookie with the #1 overall (dynasty), and while he has been a solid, possession-type, that's not what I thought I was drafting...
 
I've seen a clip of Bill Belichick saying to a group of OTs (not verbatim) "If you don't know what you're doing I can't put you in there. It's as simple as that."
:shrug: "and if the defense jumps off sides, how far is half the distance to the goal from here? Right... not far... it's about this (l l) far... 6 inches"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TD Ryan said:
Kit Fisto said:
I've seen a clip of Bill Belichick saying to a group of OTs (not verbatim) "If you don't know what you're doing I can't put you in there. It's as simple as that."
:jawdrop: "and if the defense jumps off sides, how far is half the distance to the goal from here? Right... not far... it's about this (l l) far... 6 inches"
That's the one!
 
cscmtp said:
gocats said:
If he doesn't work on his hands in the offseason his feet are going to be out of a job within 2 years......

Man, that is so tough to say about a Gator too........other than Travis Taylor, that is. :bye: :confused:
Why is there a conception that Jackson has bad hands?
That 15 score you see is from DeAngelo Williams. Troy Williamson went the year before.

 
I havent really given up on jackson -

8.11 Sigmund Bloom Jackson, Chad NEP WR 1:39:44 p.m.

thats the 123rd pick. I just happen to some other rook WRs (Marshall, Jennings), who I also took earlier, a little better.

 
I havent really given up on jackson -8.11 Sigmund Bloom Jackson, Chad NEP WR 1:39:44 p.m.thats the 123rd pick. I just happen to some other rook WRs (Marshall, Jennings), who I also took earlier, a little better.
Hey Bloom, Chad Jackson = Troy Williamson! :lmao:Nice pick! <_< :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I havent really given up on jackson -8.11 Sigmund Bloom Jackson, Chad NEP WR 1:39:44 p.m.thats the 123rd pick. I just happen to some other rook WRs (Marshall, Jennings), who I also took earlier, a little better.
The only thing holding him back is his offense. I'm not sure if he'll ever develop into a stud WR in NE, but he should be able to fill Deion Branch's role with 800-1000 and 5 TD's and be a borderline #2/#3 fantasy WR.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top