What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Darrell Jackson (1 Viewer)

gman06

Footballguy
Darrell Jackson did not practice on Wednesday. They said he would play on Sunday, however, I am a little concerned when I hear knee and Darrell Jackson. Anyone hear anything?

 
Darrell Jackson did not practice on Wednesday. They said he would play on Sunday, however, I am a little concerned when I hear knee and Darrell Jackson. Anyone hear anything?
Have nothing updated on him yet..same info you got.Seahawks | D. Jackson misses practice WednesdayWed, 29 Nov 2006 19:02:26 -0800Mike Sando, of the Tacoma News Tribune, reports Seattle Seahawks WR Darrell Jackson (knee) missed practice Wednesday, Nov. 29, but he will play Week 13.
 
What difference does it make? Its not like they can't replace his 2 catches for 20 yards from last week without too much of a problem.

 
Huh? Makes a lot of sense H.K. The guy has been money all year, and you go by one game played in the snow. Even on a down week, the guy has a td. Nice post.

 
I took it as a precautionary measure. That said, I'm still not keen on starting him against Champ in Denver.

 
Probable for Week 13 and will play Sunday. What is left to say?

He is a consistent, albeit not sexy, WR1 that most smart drafters got as a WR2 or WR3 (me in the 5th - too much value even w/ preseason knee issue).

Unless you are stocked at WR, if this guy is vertical on Sunday you start him w/ confidence.

There is something to be said for a guy who puts up a solid 15pt avg (PPR). EXAMPLE: many Ocho Cinco owners are enjoying the last few weeks, but what about the first 9? A low Round 1 or high Round 2 pick (CJ in my example) that sleeps during the first 9 weeks can bury your team! For many CJ owners, I bet those 45 point weeks are "dead" points...meaning they are out of the playoff picture.

Sorry about the DJax man love. Long-time owner and believer. Good luck. :banned:

 
Probable for Week 13 and will play Sunday. What is left to say?He is a consistent, albeit not sexy, WR1 that most smart drafters got as a WR2 or WR3 (me in the 5th - too much value even w/ preseason knee issue).Unless you are stocked at WR, if this guy is vertical on Sunday you start him w/ confidence. There is something to be said for a guy who puts up a solid 15pt avg (PPR). EXAMPLE: many Ocho Cinco owners are enjoying the last few weeks, but what about the first 9? A low Round 1 or high Round 2 pick (CJ in my example) that sleeps during the first 9 weeks can bury your team! For many CJ owners, I bet those 45 point weeks are "dead" points...meaning they are out of the playoff picture.Sorry about the DJax man love. Long-time owner and believer. Good luck. :banned:
I'm right with ya man. In my dynasty leage, ppr, 1 point per 20 yards, 6 points per td...he's the #5 receiver.I tried like hell to get him last year, couldn't, got him insanely chepa compared to what he's done. I've got him in ALL of my leagues. Great value, one of my biggest keys to success thus for this year.
 
Anyone else that thinks Branch might be a better play this week? Considering that DJax now has a slight injury plus the fact that he'll be going against Champ all night?

 
Anyone else that thinks Branch might be a better play this week? Considering that DJax now has a slight injury plus the fact that he'll be going against Champ all night?
aren't all players beat up this time of year
I think that the Seahawks did have a practice today. So unless they were just giving him the day off, which is possible, it seems that he is more "beat up" than others. I guess by that rationale, Champ Bailey is probably "beat up" too, so he probably won't be able to cover him very well, and all things considered DJax should be upgraded. :rolleyes:
 
What difference does it make? Its not like they can't replace his 2 catches for 20 yards from last week without too much of a problem.
4 WR Jackson,Darrell SEA 11 0 0 0 52 805 9 0 134.5Come on H.K., you're better than that. Even in PPG he's WR6. :thumbdown:

 
Anyone else that thinks Branch might be a better play this week? Considering that DJax now has a slight injury plus the fact that he'll be going against Champ all night?
aren't all players beat up this time of year
I think that the Seahawks did have a practice today. So unless they were just giving him the day off, which is possible, it seems that he is more "beat up" than others. I guess by that rationale, Champ Bailey is probably "beat up" too, so he probably won't be able to cover him very well, and all things considered DJax should be upgraded. :rolleyes:
:confused:
 
What difference does it make? Its not like they can't replace his 2 catches for 20 yards from last week without too much of a problem.
4 WR Jackson,Darrell SEA 11 0 0 0 52 805 9 0 134.5Come on H.K., you're better than that. Even in PPG he's WR6. :thumbdown:
Well last week it was Payton is only a probowl QB because its a popularity contest. Now DJAX is a poor mans Mike Williams. HK HK HK you may want to stay off the toot my man. or better yet spare us all with you "advise"
 
Have a look at his remaining schedule. Thats what counts. @Az and SF first 2 playoff weeks, home against SD for the championship. He's leading WRs in touchdowns with Seneca Wallace throwing to him half the season for gods sake.

 
What difference does it make? Its not like they can't replace his 2 catches for 20 yards from last week without too much of a problem.
4 WR Jackson,Darrell SEA 11 0 0 0 52 805 9 0 134.5Come on H.K., you're better than that. Even in PPG he's WR6. :thumbdown:
He is?
No, of course I'm not. mbuehner was just trying to be nice, which I appreciate.However, numbers do not lie. Branch has gotten more targets than Jackson since Hass returned from injury.

 
What difference does it make? Its not like they can't replace his 2 catches for 20 yards from last week without too much of a problem.
4 WR Jackson,Darrell SEA 11 0 0 0 52 805 9 0 134.5Come on H.K., you're better than that. Even in PPG he's WR6. :thumbdown:
He is?
No, of course I'm not. mbuehner was just trying to be nice, which I appreciate.However, numbers do not lie. Branch has gotten more targets than Jackson since Hass returned from injury.
I base all my decisions on one game sample sizes too. :hophead:

 
valhallan said:
I took it as a precautionary measure. That said, I'm still not keen on starting him against Champ in Denver.
Is Champ going to be on DJ or Branch? I view the 'Hawk WRs as 1a & 1b. With the bad knee and Branch's big play ability I would think Champ would be on him.
 
Champ always lines up on the left side of the D, which most people know by now. From what I've seen of Seattle, their WRs tend to move around all over the place, so I don't see Champ as locked down on one WR all game like we saw in the IND-DEN game where Indy always lines Wayne up on the left and Marvin on the right, so Champ was on Marvin all day. Likely both Branch and Jackson will get some looks.

 
L_O_D said:
He is a consistent, albeit not sexy, WR1 that most smart drafters got as a WR2 or WR3 (me in the 5th - too much value even w/ preseason knee issue).Unless you are stocked at WR, if this guy is vertical on Sunday you start him w/ confidence. There is something to be said for a guy who puts up a solid 15pt avg (PPR).
:goodposting: With Alexander and Fitzgerald being my first two picks, unsexy guys like Jackson (6) and Fred Taylor (5) have saved my season. :thumbup:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top