Have higher desire than fire-then-hire
Browns stuck in cycle of untried coaches, so keep Crennel, but keep eye on Cowher
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
Bud Shaw
Plain Dealer Columnist
No more training wheels. No more learner's per mits.
It's not enough to say Romeo must go. That's not the answer. It's not even an answer.
Firings are only answers when followed by the right hire. So who's it going to be?
If it's Jeff Fisher, you have my attention.
If it's Bill Cowher, my full attention.
If it's change for the express purpose of bringing in another untried head coach in need of on-the-job training, don't bother. We've seen that movie before, no?
Coach meets town. Town falls in love. Heartache ensues.
Nobody should want that, not two seasons after the most recent coaching change. You've had a front-row seat at that parade for how long now?
When exactly did Cleveland become the proving ground for coaches? We're not excluding the Cavaliers or Indians here. But the Browns' list contains one head coach with previous NFL experience: Nick Skorich, who had mixed results.
Obviously, experience in the job didn't count for much in his case. There's no airtight process for finding a successful head coach, which is why replacing Crennel requires a lot more study and planning than does dismissing him.
Unless Randy Lerner has a better idea -- and evidence of that isn't exactly teeming -- Crennel should start next season, his third, as head coach.
It's not about fairness. It's about practicality.
The Browns have spent two drafts picking players to fit the 3-4. It makes sense to give Crennel and GM Phil Savage another year of working in tandem. Would the next coach run a 3-4?
Well, he might if his name were Cowher, but hold off on that. There's no guarantee he'd be available or that he'd come to Cleveland. Cowher is a separate but tantalizing issue.
The Browns know Crennel's shortcomings now. Or should. When General Manager Phil Savage extols his head coach as a man so well-respected around the league, that sounds good. It just isn't pertinent.
Crennel's coordinator work is what garnered accolades.
Crennel should know his faults, too. It shouldn't be a point of contention by him if Savage and Lerner insist he get tougher with the loose cannons on his team and apply himself more as a problem-fixer.
Lerner could do worse than keep one eye on that and the other on Pittsburgh. With Cowher uncommitted after next season and with speculation that he might sit out 2007 to recharge his engines after 15 years as head coach, why not start next season with Crennel and see where fate takes all of them?
Whereas good cops have followed bad cops in coaching hires, and offensive minds have replaced defensive philosophers (and vice versa), the proven head coach never seems to get the call in Cleveland after the first-time head coach gets sent to the gallows. That's paramount this time.
Crennel could make that a moot point if he's capable of becoming more forceful as a head coach, but how many people really change, especially at his age? If he can't, he'll take his place in a line of tryin'-one hires.
The Browns thought they found the right combination of head coach personality and NFL experience in Butch Davis (and the antidote to Chris Palmer's approach). Then Crennel was supposed to be the change of pace to Davis.
Here's an idea. If this doesn't work, how about a proven NFL commodity?
Crazy, I know.
To reach Bud Shaw:
bshaw@plaind.com, 216-999-5639