What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Kenny Irons (1 Viewer)

What will Irons make in the NFL?

  • Every down Rudi Johnson-esque back.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • TD Vulture

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3rd Down Back

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Solid Back-Up

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Out of League In 3 Years

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Decent in HB by Commitee

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Depends on Where He's Drafted

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

KoolKat

Footballguy
It seems like once you're done at Auburn, you become a productive NFL back. Irons ran in the 4.4s, better than Marshawn Lynch. Do you sharks think he'll be the value pick for rookies? Will he succeed at the next level?

 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
Regardless, what do you think he makes in the NFL?
 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
So far, I agree with you.
 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
Regardless, what do you think he makes in the NFL?
solid backup who might get a shot down the road depending on what team drafts him.
 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
 
irons compared to rudi :unsure:

if he must be compared to an auburn back, i see him closer to a real poor man's caddy than i do rudi.

 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link."Use regardless instead."

 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link."Use regardless instead."
I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The guy cant stay healthy, he's had just about every nagging injury there is, turf toe, high ankle sprain, deep thigh bruise, you name it he's pretty much had it. Think Chris Perry

 
From what I gather reading scouting reports and watching highlights, Irons is somewhat like an inferior cross of Clinton Portis and Cadillac Williams. He's not the biggest guy around, but he runs hard and low. I agree that he would be a nice fit for a team like Denver. He could start for some teams and be pretty productive, but he's not quite talented enough to be a surefire starter at the next level.

 
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
They really have little in common but same position and alma mater in comparison. Johnson was a JUCO transfer who had a huge year in his one season at Auburn, but many disliked his measurables (too heavy at his size at 5'9" 228 and too slow w/4.63 40) and thought he was too raw, should have stuck around another season. He wasn't a first round pick, and never expected to be one. He lasted until Day Two and had little expectation beyond a career back-up/short-yardage type coming out of the draft.If Irons left last year, the comparison might be more relevant, but Irons entered the season as one of the top-rated seniors. He struggled through an injury-prone year, but had a solid performance in the Senior Bowl and now has helped himself a lot at the Combine. He should be a Day One pick and carries expectations of being a feature back.While Irons isn't afraid to run inside, he doesn't run with power Johnson has. He is more elusive, getting lost behind his linemen, then slashing to the second level. Johnson has surprising quick feet for a big man, but generally a power runner. About 30 lbs difference in weight lends itself to vastly different running styles.As for Rudi's level being his ceiling...well, as a fabulously consistent double-digit TD feature back in the prime of his career you can't be certain we've seen his ceiling. If we have, it's a pretty good one to label a "ceiling"...I mean, what do you have left consistently higher over the last three years: LT, LJ and Alexander...maybe Tiki?
 
fruity pebbles said:
Michael J Fox said:
fruity pebbles said:
billyjoe said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
Don Quixote said:
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link."Use regardless instead."
I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.
Sorry for the brief hijack but I've been holding this back far too long. Fruity your avatar is disturbing to me on many levels, I know I probably don't have a right to ask but could you be so kind as to change it.
 
fruity pebbles said:
billyjoe said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
Don Quixote said:
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
SYLLABICATION: ir•re•gard•less ADVERB: Nonstandard Regardless

Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir– prefix and –less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.

You're right, it is a word, used by people who make up words. They've done it so much it's actually been documented.

Anyway, please define regardless and irregardless. Beyond the fact one is a legitimate word and one is made up.

 
fruity pebbles said:
billyjoe said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
Don Quixote said:
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
SYLLABICATION: ir•re•gard•less ADVERB: Nonstandard Regardless

Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir– prefix and –less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.

You're right, it is a word, used by people who make up words. They've done it so much it's actually been documented.

Anyway, please define regardless and irregardless. Beyond the fact one is a legitimate word and one is made up.
See, it annoys pompous tools.
 
fruity pebbles said:
Michael J Fox said:
fruity pebbles said:
billyjoe said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
Don Quixote said:
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link."Use regardless instead."
I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.
Sorry for the brief hijack but I've been holding this back far too long. Fruity your avatar is disturbing to me on many levels, I know I probably don't have a right to ask but could you be so kind as to change it.
Who cares this threads F^c&ed anyway. :suds: :shrug: :thumbup:
 
fruity pebbles said:
Michael J Fox said:
fruity pebbles said:
billyjoe said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
Don Quixote said:
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link."Use regardless instead."
I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.
Sorry for the brief hijack but I've been holding this back far too long. Fruity your avatar is disturbing to me on many levels, I know I probably don't have a right to ask but could you be so kind as to change it.
Why? Several have commented that they like it.
 
I think heart is something that tends to get overlooked a lot, but definitely a huge part of being a success in the NFL. I like the fact that Irons comes from a football family and that it seems to be important to him, beyond the material rewards. The only major concerns I have of him are that he can stay healthy (at least he's willing to play hurt) and can put on 10-15 lbs (he appears to have the work ethic to do it).

 
fruity pebbles said:
Michael J Fox said:
fruity pebbles said:
billyjoe said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
Don Quixote said:
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link.

"Use regardless instead."
I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.
Sorry for the brief hijack but I've been holding this back far too long. Fruity your avatar is disturbing to me on many levels, I know I probably don't have a right to ask but could you be so kind as to change it.
Why? Several have commented that they like it.
It looks like two shirtless pubescent boys doing the same type of act that my schnauzer does when he gets excited.

 
fruity pebbles said:
Michael J Fox said:
fruity pebbles said:
billyjoe said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
Don Quixote said:
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link.

"Use regardless instead."
I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.
Sorry for the brief hijack but I've been holding this back far too long. Fruity your avatar is disturbing to me on many levels, I know I probably don't have a right to ask but could you be so kind as to change it.
Why? Several have commented that they like it.
It looks like two shirtless pubescent boys doing the same type of act that my schnauzer does when he gets excited.
They're dancing

 
fruity pebbles said:
I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.
Well played.
 
fruity pebbles said:
billyjoe said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
fruity pebbles said:
KoolKat said:
Don Quixote said:
Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardless
SYLLABICATION: ir•re•gard•less ADVERB: Nonstandard Regardless

Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir– prefix and –less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.

You're right, it is a word, used by people who make up words. They've done it so much it's actually been documented.

Anyway, please define regardless and irregardless. Beyond the fact one is a legitimate word and one is made up.
See, it annoys pompous tools.
Irlets iradd ir irto irrandom irwords irto irannoy irpeople. Ircomedy irgenius!Irand irit's irnot irreally irannoying. Iryou ircan iruse irmade irup irwords irall iryou irwant. Irit's iractually irjust irfunny.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top