For those of you who vote depends on where he is drafted specify which teams you think will be good fits and which bad. TIA.Irons to Texans second round.He is a one cut back, zone blocking would be ideal for him.
I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
Explain.He's nothing like Rudi Johnson![]()
5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
Regardless, what do you think he makes in the NFL?He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
So far, I agree with you.He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
solid backup who might get a shot down the road depending on what team drafts him.Regardless, what do you think he makes in the NFL?He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
concur.He's nothing like Rudi Johnson![]()
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessWhen you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I didn't mean to make this thread Kenny Irons V. Rudi Johnson, that's just who he reminded me of when watching him. I should have named it differently. What I really want to know is what people think he'll do in the NFL.concur.He's nothing like Rudi Johnson![]()
![]()
Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link."Use regardless instead."http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessWhen you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link."Use regardless instead."http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessWhen you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
Finally a useful post. Thank You.The guy cant stay healthy, he's had just about every nagging injury there is, turf toe, high ankle sprain, deep thigh bruise, you name it he's pretty much had it. Think Chris Perry
I dont get why you sound so excited about that comparisonFinally a useful post. Thank You.The guy cant stay healthy, he's had just about every nagging injury there is, turf toe, high ankle sprain, deep thigh bruise, you name it he's pretty much had it. Think Chris Perry![]()
Better than reading posts about word definitions.I dont get why you sound so excited about that comparisonFinally a useful post. Thank You.The guy cant stay healthy, he's had just about every nagging injury there is, turf toe, high ankle sprain, deep thigh bruise, you name it he's pretty much had it. Think Chris Perry![]()
irons compared to rudiif he must be compared to an auburn back, i see him closer to a real poor man's caddy than i do rudi.
They really have little in common but same position and alma mater in comparison. Johnson was a JUCO transfer who had a huge year in his one season at Auburn, but many disliked his measurables (too heavy at his size at 5'9" 228 and too slow w/4.63 40) and thought he was too raw, should have stuck around another season. He wasn't a first round pick, and never expected to be one. He lasted until Day Two and had little expectation beyond a career back-up/short-yardage type coming out of the draft.If Irons left last year, the comparison might be more relevant, but Irons entered the season as one of the top-rated seniors. He struggled through an injury-prone year, but had a solid performance in the Senior Bowl and now has helped himself a lot at the Combine. He should be a Day One pick and carries expectations of being a feature back.While Irons isn't afraid to run inside, he doesn't run with power Johnson has. He is more elusive, getting lost behind his linemen, then slashing to the second level. Johnson has surprising quick feet for a big man, but generally a power runner. About 30 lbs difference in weight lends itself to vastly different running styles.As for Rudi's level being his ceiling...well, as a fabulously consistent double-digit TD feature back in the prime of his career you can't be certain we've seen his ceiling. If we have, it's a pretty good one to label a "ceiling"...I mean, what do you have left consistently higher over the last three years: LT, LJ and Alexander...maybe Tiki?They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
Sorry for the brief hijack but I've been holding this back far too long. Fruity your avatar is disturbing to me on many levels, I know I probably don't have a right to ask but could you be so kind as to change it.fruity pebbles said:I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.Michael J Fox said:Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link."Use regardless instead."fruity pebbles said:http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessbillyjoe said:When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.fruity pebbles said:He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.KoolKat said:I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.fruity pebbles said:5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?KoolKat said:I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Don Quixote said:Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
SYLLABICATION: ir•re•gard•less ADVERB: Nonstandard Regardlessfruity pebbles said:http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessbillyjoe said:When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.fruity pebbles said:He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.KoolKat said:I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.fruity pebbles said:5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?KoolKat said:I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Don Quixote said:Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
See, it annoys pompous tools.SYLLABICATION: ir•re•gard•less ADVERB: Nonstandard Regardlessfruity pebbles said:http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessbillyjoe said:When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.fruity pebbles said:He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.KoolKat said:I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.fruity pebbles said:5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?KoolKat said:I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Don Quixote said:Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir– prefix and –less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
You're right, it is a word, used by people who make up words. They've done it so much it's actually been documented.
Anyway, please define regardless and irregardless. Beyond the fact one is a legitimate word and one is made up.
Who cares this threads F^c&ed anyway.Sorry for the brief hijack but I've been holding this back far too long. Fruity your avatar is disturbing to me on many levels, I know I probably don't have a right to ask but could you be so kind as to change it.fruity pebbles said:I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.Michael J Fox said:Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link."Use regardless instead."fruity pebbles said:http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessbillyjoe said:When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.fruity pebbles said:He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.KoolKat said:I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.fruity pebbles said:5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?KoolKat said:I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Don Quixote said:Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
Why? Several have commented that they like it.Sorry for the brief hijack but I've been holding this back far too long. Fruity your avatar is disturbing to me on many levels, I know I probably don't have a right to ask but could you be so kind as to change it.fruity pebbles said:I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.Michael J Fox said:Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link."Use regardless instead."fruity pebbles said:http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessbillyjoe said:When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.fruity pebbles said:He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.KoolKat said:I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.fruity pebbles said:5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?KoolKat said:I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Don Quixote said:Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
It looks like two shirtless pubescent boys doing the same type of act that my schnauzer does when he gets excited.Why? Several have commented that they like it.Sorry for the brief hijack but I've been holding this back far too long. Fruity your avatar is disturbing to me on many levels, I know I probably don't have a right to ask but could you be so kind as to change it.fruity pebbles said:I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.Michael J Fox said:Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link.fruity pebbles said:http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessbillyjoe said:When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.fruity pebbles said:He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.KoolKat said:I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.fruity pebbles said:5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?KoolKat said:I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Don Quixote said:Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
"Use regardless instead."
They're dancingIt looks like two shirtless pubescent boys doing the same type of act that my schnauzer does when he gets excited.Why? Several have commented that they like it.Sorry for the brief hijack but I've been holding this back far too long. Fruity your avatar is disturbing to me on many levels, I know I probably don't have a right to ask but could you be so kind as to change it.fruity pebbles said:I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.Michael J Fox said:Obviously you missed the bottom section of your own link.fruity pebbles said:http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessbillyjoe said:When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.fruity pebbles said:He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.KoolKat said:I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.fruity pebbles said:5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?KoolKat said:I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Don Quixote said:Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
"Use regardless instead."
Well played.fruity pebbles said:I didn't miss anything. He said it's a made up word and it's not. Whether or not it's the best word is a fair question. I like the word because it irritates pompous tools.
fixed.Irregardless, they're dancingIt looks like two shirtless pubescent boys doing the same type of act that my schnauzer does when he gets excited.
Irlets iradd ir irto irrandom irwords irto irannoy irpeople. Ircomedy irgenius!Irand irit's irnot irreally irannoying. Iryou ircan iruse irmade irup irwords irall iryou irwant. Irit's iractually irjust irfunny.See, it annoys pompous tools.SYLLABICATION: ir•re•gard•less ADVERB: Nonstandard Regardlessfruity pebbles said:http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book...va=irregardlessbillyjoe said:When you start making up words, that's usually a sign you're losing the argument.fruity pebbles said:He just weighed in at 198 at the combines. Irregardless he doesn't run with the strength or power that Rudi does. I don't see any real comparisons between the two other than they both went Auburn and they're the same height.KoolKat said:I found 5' 10" 203 V. 5' 10" 228, but Johnson is also much older than Irons, he still has room to grow and put on weight. Something he will have to do to stay healthy in the NFL.fruity pebbles said:5'10 198 is the same size as 5'10 230?KoolKat said:I think just attending Auburn ups a RBs stock. They are roughly the same size with similar running styles. I expect Irons to be a 1st day pick but not a 1st Rounder similar to Johnson. I think a Rudi Johnson level is the ceiling for Irons abilities.Don Quixote said:Why the Rudi Johnson comparison? Besides Auburn, what do they have in common?
Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir– prefix and –less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
You're right, it is a word, used by people who make up words. They've done it so much it's actually been documented.
Anyway, please define regardless and irregardless. Beyond the fact one is a legitimate word and one is made up.
thank you.irons compared to rudiif he must be compared to an auburn back, i see him closer to a real poor man's caddy than i do rudi.
![]()