What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bloom, Lammey, Baca Top 20 RBs Draft Rankings (1 Viewer)

OL Ben Grubbs

40 yard: 5.05

Bench: 35 reps

Vertical Jump: 29"

Broad Jump: 8' 10"

3-Cone: 7.7.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's outstanding, isn't it?

 
Surprised Pittman's so low.
Im just not sure how he fits. He doesn't seem like a feature back, but he's not a versatile role-playing back either. I suppose he could be a Tatum Bell/Julius Jones type as his upside, which is why he ranks higher on my fantasy list than my draft list.
 
Wow, Leonard at 4? Really? I'm not saying its not right...its just surprising to me. I had him at 6 in my own personal rankings behind Hunt and Bush. Do you think he could ever be a starting HB in the NFL? I really can only see him as a RBBC but you know more then me
PFW has him at #4 as well.
 
Wow, Leonard at 4? Really? I'm not saying its not right...its just surprising to me. I had him at 6 in my own personal rankings behind Hunt and Bush. Do you think he could ever be a starting HB in the NFL? I really can only see him as a RBBC but you know more then me
This is exactly my concern as well. He strikes me as someone who will be far more valuable to his NFL team than he ever will be from a fantasy perspective.
 
Wow, Leonard at 4? Really? I'm not saying its not right...its just surprising to me. I had him at 6 in my own personal rankings behind Hunt and Bush. Do you think he could ever be a starting HB in the NFL? I really can only see him as a RBBC but you know more then me
The bottom line in my draft rankings is helping your team win games. I think Leonard will excel in that category, even if he doesnt get enough touches to be a big factor in fantasy leagues. A lot of his value doesn't show up on the stat sheet.
 
Surprised Pittman's so low.
Im just not sure how he fits. He doesn't seem like a feature back, but he's not a versatile role-playing back either. I suppose he could be a Tatum Bell/Julius Jones type as his upside, which is why he ranks higher on my fantasy list than my draft list.
I think you need to make it clearer in the thread's title that this is your NFL draft list, not your fantasy ranking list.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, and I also hear the Packers and the Bills both want Lynch. We may see a draft day trade.

 
Depending on where these guys land players will rise and fall. So if Lynch lands in San Diego (hypothetically) his value would drop below Booker if he were to go to Buffalo for example. Regardless of ability.

Just saying.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Depending on where these guys land players will rise and fall. So if Lynch lands in San Diego (hypothetically) his value would drop below Booker if he were to go to Buffalo for example. Regardless of ability. Just saying.
These are strictly pre-draft rankings. The Bloom 100 is still in effect for relative fantasy values and will continue to be updated after the draft.
 
Depending on where these guys land players will rise and fall. So if Lynch lands in San Diego (hypothetically) his value would drop below Booker if he were to go to Buffalo for example. Regardless of ability.

Just saying.
These are strictly pre-draft rankings. The Bloom 100 is still in effect for relative fantasy values and will continue to be updated after the draft.
Is the Bloom 100 registered, patented, and trademarked? Just asking... :bag: :ph34r: :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Baca's rankings now up.

Mine are scheduled to go up tomorrow!

Baca's RB rankings
Lammey's rankings
dizamm that was fast! :goodposting:

YO!

BUM RUSH THE SHOW!
this is a funny thread:Lammey : Mine are up tomorrow. here is Blooms.

Bloom: Baca's ratings are here..Mine are up now..Lammey comes tomorrow.

Baca: Lammey's rating are up, Bloom is here. mine are up now too..

:confused:

I was over Under, and Under was over Dunn.

- Airplane

just having some fun with you guys! good lists..anyone feel that A. Peterson is a Chris Brown type of 'big RB' who runs upright and is prone to injury, or do we all feel that he's legit and will make a run at the R.O.Y. Award?

 
My first reaction is what a summarily uninspiring RB class this appears to be...if there's ever a year to pay up for one of the top 2, it would be 2007.

Now, some thoughts on the NFLDG Triumverate's rankings:

*** Lorenzo Booker-Mania -- While I'm not surprised that all three guys have Peterson and Lynch ranked #1 and #2, respectively [after all, so does the whole world], I really have trouble understanding Lorenzo Booker's position at #3 UNANIMOUSLY. I realize Booker is a reall great guy and was gracious enough to give NFLDG and The Audible some love, but what are the odds that all three of you are equally convinced Booker's consensus ranking is so far off?

NFL Draft Countdown -- 10th
Mike Mayock -- 5th
Mel Kiper -- 11th
Great Blue North -- 8th
NFL Draft Scout -- 8th*** The Brian Leonard Conundrum -- I'm really hoping the Eagles land Leonard, for selfish reasons (The Eagles are my team obviously) and for fantasy reasons (I think the Eagles offense is ideally suited for his talents) but he's one of those guys I worry the wrong team will misuse. While he's certainly an able blocker, he has the instincts and measurables to be an every down player. I'm with the NFLDG contingent that he's a top 3 or 4 prospect...I just hope five to ten years from now we look back and see that his coaches utilized him the right way.

*** Michael Bush -- I'm way down on Bush for a lot of reasons. Louisville backs have proven to be really interchangeable (Eric Shelton anyone?) with Kolby Smith and Stripling stepping in immediately and playing well. Add to that Bush's history of foot ailments (not good for a big back) and the fact that he's not as strong as his size would indicate, and I can't see how he's worth a 2nd round draft pick.

 
*** Lorenzo Booker-Mania -- While I'm not surprised that all three guys have Peterson and Lynch ranked #1 and #2, respectively [after all, so does the whole world], I really have trouble understanding Lorenzo Booker's position at #3 UNANIMOUSLY. I realize Booker is a reall great guy and was gracious enough to give NFLDG and The Audible some love, but what are the odds that all three of you are equally convinced Booker's consensus ranking is so far off?

NFL Draft Countdown -- 10th
Mike Mayock -- 5th
Mel Kiper -- 11th
Great Blue North -- 8th
NFL Draft Scout -- 8th
For me it all comes down to versatility and big plays. Few, if any, backs in this class have Booker's game breaking combination of shiftiness and straight line speed. He can also split out wide, creating matchup nightmares for DCs, and return kicks. There are plenty of guys that gave us time to talk to them, and some at the Texas vs. the Nation that I would consider friends after hanging out with them back at the hotel. The fact that Booker gave us his time did not influence our rankings - in fact it was the exact opposite. When I met Booker's agent in Mobile, I told him we thought he was extremely underrated and would be one of the steals of the draft. The fact we saw "the real Booker" before others did was the reason Booker and his agent warmed to us so much, not the other way around.

So believe it or not, we did all come to rank Booker 3rd independant of each other, and we likely would have even if we had never interviewed him - although talking to him gave us a sense of how "together" he was, which just increased his stock in our eyes - so the interview had an effect, but no more than it would have if someone else had done it, and we had just listened to it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with Wood on Booker. Even playing at FSU recently, that's no excuse for a guy of such "game breaking combination of shiftiness and straight line speed...(who) can also split out wide, creating matchup nightmares for DCs, and return kicks" to have compiled such awful college numbers.

 
I agree with Wood on Booker. Even playing at FSU recently, that's no excuse for a guy of such "game breaking combination of shiftiness and straight line speed...(who) can also split out wide, creating matchup nightmares for DCs, and return kicks" to have compiled such awful college numbers.
I wouldnt say Booker's college stats are "awful":
Code:
YEAR	ATT 	YDS 	AVG 	LNG 	TD 	REC 	YDS 	AVG 	LNG 	TD 	FUM 	LST2003 	62 	334 	5.4 	71 	3 	19 	86 	4.5 	20 	0 	0 	02004 	173 	887 	5.1 	53 	4 	24 	160 	6.7 	25 	0 	0 	02005 	119 	552 	4.6 	58 	4 	38 	329 	8.7 	71 	2 	0 	02006 	143 	616 	4.3 	34 	4 	33 	420 	12.7 	73 	0 	0 	0
compare them to Leon Washington:
Code:
YEAR	ATT 	YDS 	AVG 	LNG 	TD 	REC 	YDS 	AVG 	LNG 	TD 	FUM 	LST2003 	74 	387 	5.2 	27 	1 	10 	90 	9.0 	18 	0 	0 	02004 	138 	951 	6.9 	69 	7 	14 	90 	6.4 	14 	0 	0 	02005 	97 	430 	4.4 	26 	3 	25 	267 	10.7 	61 	1 	0 	0
I would be more likely to be persuaded if your argument was based on something other than stats. Still, I can see that we have reached an impasse here, and we'll just have to agree to disagree.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top 20 RBs - Bloom

Top 20 RBs - Lammey

Top 20 RBs - Baca

Note: These rankings are based on draft value, not potential fantasy value.
Averaging these out... Bloom / Lammey / BacaA player not in another top20 gets 21 points...

Code:
01-Adrian Peterson-Oklahoma----------6'2--217--01-01-01--01.002-Marshawn Lynch--California--------5'11-215--02-02-02--02.003-Lorenzo Booker--Florida State-----5'11-191--03-03-03--03.004-Michael Bush----Louisville--------6'2--243--05-04-04--04.305-Kenny Irons-----Auburn------------5'11-203--07-05-05--05.706-Brian Leonard---Rutgers-----------6'2--226--04-06-09--06.307-Antonio Pittman-Ohio State--------5'11-207--08-07-06--07.008-Brandon Jackson-Nebraska----------5'10-210--09-09-07--08.309-Tony Hunt-------Penn State--------6'2--233--06-08-12--08.710-Kolby Smith-----Louisville--------5'11-220--13-10-13--12.011-Jason Snelling--Virginia----------5'11-230--11-16-11--12.712-DeShawn Wynn----Florida-----------5'10-232--17-12-10--13.013-Dwayne Wright---Fresno State------6'0--228--12-14-16--14.014-Darius Walker---Notre Dame--------5'10-206--14-13-15--14.015-Thomas Clayton--Kansas State------5'10-218--16-11-xx--16.016-Tyrone Moss-----Miami-Florida-----5'9--231--19-15-14--16.017-Ahmad Bradshaw--Marshall----------5'10-198--10-19-xx--16.718-Kenneth Darby---Alabama-----------5'10-213--xx-xx-08--16.719-Selvin Young----Texas-------------5'11-207--15-20-18--17.720-Chris Henry-----Arizona-----------5'11-230--18-18-19--18.321-Garrett Wolfe---Northern Illinois-5'8--186--20-xx-17--19.322-Ronnie McGill---North Carolina----5'10-220--xx-17-20--19.3
 
Sigmund Bloom said:
Colin Dowling said:
I agree with Wood on Booker. Even playing at FSU recently, that's no excuse for a guy of such "game breaking combination of shiftiness and straight line speed...(who) can also split out wide, creating matchup nightmares for DCs, and return kicks" to have compiled such awful college numbers.
I wouldnt say Booker's college stats are "awful":
Code:
YEAR	ATT 	YDS 	AVG 	LNG 	TD 	REC 	YDS 	AVG 	LNG 	TD 	FUM 	LST2003 	62 	334 	5.4 	71 	3 	19 	86 	4.5 	20 	0 	0 	02004 	173 	887 	5.1 	53 	4 	24 	160 	6.7 	25 	0 	0 	02005 	119 	552 	4.6 	58 	4 	38 	329 	8.7 	71 	2 	0 	02006 	143 	616 	4.3 	34 	4 	33 	420 	12.7 	73 	0 	0 	0
compare them to Leon Washington:
Code:
YEAR	ATT 	YDS 	AVG 	LNG 	TD 	REC 	YDS 	AVG 	LNG 	TD 	FUM 	LST2003 	74 	387 	5.2 	27 	1 	10 	90 	9.0 	18 	0 	0 	02004 	138 	951 	6.9 	69 	7 	14 	90 	6.4 	14 	0 	0 	02005 	97 	430 	4.4 	26 	3 	25 	267 	10.7 	61 	1 	0 	0
I would be more likely to be persuaded if your argument was based on something other than stats. Still, I can see that we have reached an impasse here, and we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Bloom, I don't understand how comparing the guy you rank as RB3 with Leon Washington is helping your argument. Washington was mediocre in college, drafted as RB9 (in an admittedly deeper draft), and was mediocre in his first year in the NFL. If the rough idea is to say Booker is on par with Washington, then I'll agree.
 
I wouldn't say washington was mediocre last year. Of his eight starts he averaged less than 4.0 ypc in just three of them while averaging over 5.0 ypc in four games. Not to mention he averaged 10.8 ypr

 
Last edited by a moderator:
OL Ben Grubbs

40 yard: 5.05

Bench: 35 reps

Vertical Jump: 29"

Broad Jump: 8' 10"

3-Cone: 7.7.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's outstanding, isn't it?
It's very good, but not elite. I haven't checked, but I'm assuming there are at least a handful over 40.(For what it's worth, I did 36 reps back in college - too bad I'm 5'10" :shrug: )

 
OL Ben Grubbs

40 yard: 5.05

Bench: 35 reps

Vertical Jump: 29"

Broad Jump: 8' 10"

3-Cone: 7.7.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but that's outstanding, isn't it?
Like the above poster says it's good, but not great. Either way that stat is overrated by the rest of us who couldn't imagine being able to lift that much weight. I remember some lineman from a div II school set the record with 45 reps a few years back and wasn't even drafted
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bloom, I don't understand how comparing the guy you rank as RB3 with Leon Washington is helping your argument. Washington was mediocre in college, drafted as RB9 (in an admittedly deeper draft), and was mediocre in his first year in the NFL. If the rough idea is to say Booker is on par with Washington, then I'll agree.
It was mainly to show that Booker's "awful" stats do not preclude success in the NFL. Washington had similar stats at Florida St, and was modestly successful. Anyone who has watched both backs should agree that Booker's skillset is a notch above Washington's - so I see Washington as Booker's floor.
 
I would be more likely to be persuaded if your argument was based on something other than stats. Still, I can see that we have reached an impasse here, and we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Bloom, I don't understand how comparing the guy you rank as RB3 with Leon Washington is helping your argument. Washington was mediocre in college, drafted as RB9 (in an admittedly deeper draft), and was mediocre in his first year in the NFL. If the rough idea is to say Booker is on par with Washington, then I'll agree.
:shrug:
 
Everyone is missing the boat on Brandon Jackson
Agreed. I think he's still a year away so whoever drafts him will need to be patient. That being said, he has a heck of a lot more upside than does a Brian Leonard or Antonio Pittman.I think the combine will hurt his draft position, and as a result he will be an even greater dynasty sleeper.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Surprised Pittman's so low.
Im just not sure how he fits. He doesn't seem like a feature back, but he's not a versatile role-playing back either. I suppose he could be a Tatum Bell/Julius Jones type as his upside, which is why he ranks higher on my fantasy list than my draft list.
Totally agree in terms of not understanding how he'd fit into the NFL. Not enough talent to be a starting NFL back but also doesn't seem to have the receiving skills to be a third down back. I think whenever a guy doesn't appear to have talent he's compared to Rudi Johnson...I've seen that thrown around here a few times...I don't think he'll have half the career Rudi has had.
 
My first reaction is what a summarily uninspiring RB class this appears to be...if there's ever a year to pay up for one of the top 2, it would be 2007.
Thoughts on this, anyone? Bloom, ya there? What can we expect out of the guys outside of the top 2 this year? We see how they are ranked, sure, but Wood's comment brings up an interesting point that could change the way we draft or trade draft picks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My first reaction is what a summarily uninspiring RB class this appears to be...if there's ever a year to pay up for one of the top 2, it would be 2007.
Thoughts on this, anyone? Bloom, ya there? What can we expect out of the guys outside of the top 2 this year? We see how they are ranked, sure, but Wood's comment brings up an interesting point that could change the way we draft or trade draft picks.
Outside of the top-2 guys, much of it will depend on situation. For example, Dom Davis and Rudi Johnson are recent example of later picks that found themselves in situations where, given the opportunity, they were able to take a lot of carries and make the most of them. Michael Turner is the opposite case. We can pick over these guys a ton (and it's fun to do so) but the mud isn't going to start settling on the bottom of the pond until after draft day.
 
My first reaction is what a summarily uninspiring RB class this appears to be...if there's ever a year to pay up for one of the top 2, it would be 2007.
Thoughts on this, anyone? Bloom, ya there? What can we expect out of the guys outside of the top 2 this year? We see how they are ranked, sure, but Wood's comment brings up an interesting point that could change the way we draft or trade draft picks.
Outside of the top-2 guys, much of it will depend on situation. For example, Dom Davis and Rudi Johnson are recent example of later picks that found themselves in situations where, given the opportunity, they were able to take a lot of carries and make the most of them. Michael Turner is the opposite case. We can pick over these guys a ton (and it's fun to do so) but the mud isn't going to start settling on the bottom of the pond until after draft day.
:shrug:
 
My first reaction is what a summarily uninspiring RB class this appears to be...if there's ever a year to pay up for one of the top 2, it would be 2007.
Thoughts on this, anyone? Bloom, ya there? What can we expect out of the guys outside of the top 2 this year? We see how they are ranked, sure, but Wood's comment brings up an interesting point that could change the way we draft or trade draft picks.
Outside of the top-2 guys, much of it will depend on situation. For example, Dom Davis and Rudi Johnson are recent example of later picks that found themselves in situations where, given the opportunity, they were able to take a lot of carries and make the most of them. Michael Turner is the opposite case. We can pick over these guys a ton (and it's fun to do so) but the mud isn't going to start settling on the bottom of the pond until after draft day.
Exactly :lmao:It's rare when a RB is so transcendant he can step into virtually any situation and have success; but in this class I think most of the backs has some very pronounced flaws. In my mind, prior to the draft, all we can do is speculate and one of the ways I do that with RBs is to think about how many situations I could envision them flourishing in, versus really struggling.That's one of the reasons I'm so perplexed about Lorenzo Booker. I can think of so few situations where he's likely to even get the chance to flourish, much less have the situation in place to facilitate it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top