Edited by JZilla, 23 January 2013 - 09:09 AM.
***OFFICIAL*** Washington Nationals ongoing thread
#1
Posted 03 April 2007 - 03:19 PM
#2
Posted 03 April 2007 - 03:30 PM
#3
Posted 03 April 2007 - 03:44 PM
:JonRauchowner:
#4
Posted 04 April 2007 - 12:15 PM
Thanks Jorge
I boldly predict they'll take 1/3 from the Deebs.
#5
Posted 05 April 2007 - 08:49 AM
Dmitri Young had two doubles and may hit at first base until Nick Johnson's broken leg is healed. But you haven't lived until you see Young scream, "YOURS," on a high popup on a sunny day.
#6
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:14 PM
Jason Bergmann is putting em on already.
eta: Batters, not Austin Kearns' ears
Edited by JZilla, 05 April 2007 - 04:27 PM.
#7
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:16 PM
#8
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:31 PM
#9
Posted 05 April 2007 - 03:32 PM
50 pitches in 1 inning is pretty staunch.
He did get a K.
#10
Posted 05 April 2007 - 04:23 PM
#11
Posted 07 April 2007 - 06:05 PM
Boy this team is the stink. The offense may pick up a bit once they get Casto out of the 2-spot, not sure what's up with that but the guy has shown he's not ready.
#12
Posted 08 April 2007 - 06:19 PM
I think 27 to 33 wins at home. 25 to 30 wins on the road. 52 to 63 wins total.
This team is clearly the worst team we've seen in a couple of years, right?
#13
Posted 08 April 2007 - 06:20 PM
They're not exactly loaded with options, though. Who would you put there?The offense may pick up a bit once they get Casto out of the 2-spot, not sure what's up with that but the guy has shown he's not ready.
#14
Posted 11 April 2007 - 06:47 PM
Need some official predictions on W/L record by the end of the season. For betting purposes, as I feel the lines haven't yet represented just how awful Washington is.
I think 27 to 33 wins at home. 25 to 30 wins on the road. 52 to 63 wins total.
This team is clearly the worst team we've seen in a couple of years, right?
Yup.
121 is not out of the question.
#15
Posted 11 April 2007 - 06:50 PM
They're not exactly loaded with options, though. Who would you put there?
The offense may pick up a bit once they get Casto out of the 2-spot, not sure what's up with that but the guy has shown he's not ready.
Anybody who can put a bat on a ball. I'd put Church there. That gives you a pretty solid 1-5. Casto is a weak link, easy out, may as well put the pitcher or Schneider there.
#16
Posted 11 April 2007 - 07:27 PM
#17
Posted 12 April 2007 - 06:25 PM
Well, there's one for you. Check back in another week for number 2.I'm starting to think that relying on their closer for saves might have been a mistake.
#18
Posted 12 April 2007 - 06:41 PM
#19
Posted 19 April 2007 - 07:43 AM
ON FIRE!!!!
#20
Posted 22 April 2007 - 03:46 PM
#21
Posted 08 May 2007 - 08:07 AM
#22
Posted 09 May 2007 - 08:46 AM
#23
Posted 09 May 2007 - 12:10 PM
This team almost looked decent a couple times but I think reality has set in now. 121 is a very distinct possibility.
#24
Posted 10 May 2007 - 02:55 PM
They should move Cordero soon before he loses all of his value. Give Rauch the closer gig.
Poor Ryan Zimmerman.
#25
Posted 13 May 2007 - 12:18 PM
#26
Posted 15 May 2007 - 04:24 PM
#27
Posted 16 May 2007 - 05:55 AM
Poor Ryan Zimmerman.
Man, this guy has really started slow. I know there's no one to protect him, but shouldn't he be walking more - instead of putting in nightly 0-4 efforts?
#28
Posted 16 May 2007 - 06:44 AM
Poor Ryan Zimmerman.
Man, this guy has really started slow. I know there's no one to protect him, but shouldn't he be walking more - instead of putting in nightly 0-4 efforts?
Ye olde sophomore slump. No real explanation. I think he'll come back around. They could really use some stability in that lineup.
#29
Posted 16 May 2007 - 06:13 PM
#30
Posted 17 May 2007 - 11:46 AM
Rauch is the new closer.
#31
Posted 17 May 2007 - 04:00 PM
Is this permanent?Rauch is the new closer.
#32
Posted 17 May 2007 - 04:25 PM
Is this permanent?
Rauch is the new closer.
Not until Cordero gets traded...
#33
Posted 17 May 2007 - 08:43 PM
But my crystal ball is a bit fuzzy so I can't say for sure
#34
Posted 21 May 2007 - 08:52 AM
#35
Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:06 AM
Two saves in a row is pretty telling
But my crystal ball is a bit fuzzy so I can't say for sure
Acta said after Thursday that he would go back to Cordero. The 8th inning stint for Chad was a one time thing apparently.
#36
Posted 21 May 2007 - 02:39 PM
#37
Posted 22 May 2007 - 07:30 AM
Is this specific to the closer position or just a general comment?Acta doesn't really know what he's doing.
#38
Posted 22 May 2007 - 07:46 AM
Is this specific to the closer position or just a general comment?
Acta doesn't really know what he's doing.
General comment, but in his defense, he really only has half a team's worth of major league material to work with.
Still, I haven't seen anything to make me think he'll be around more than a season or two. I've been down on him since the Casto in the 2-hole experiment that went on way too long.
#39
Posted 22 May 2007 - 08:58 AM
1 John Patterson ® (D.L.)
2 Shawn Hill ® (D.L.)
3 Jason Bergmann ® (D.L.)
4 Matt Chico (L)
5 Mike O'Connor (L) (D.L.)
5 Jason Simontacchi ®
5 Jerome Williams ® (D.L.)
Leaving them now with most likely the worst rotation in MLB history.
Edited by RedRaiders, 22 May 2007 - 08:58 AM.
#40
Posted 22 May 2007 - 10:18 AM
Here's their starting pitching depth chart right now.
1 John Patterson ® (D.L.)
2 Shawn Hill ® (D.L.)
3 Jason Bergmann ® (D.L.)
4 Matt Chico (L)
5 Mike O'Connor (L) (D.L.)
5 Jason Simontacchi ®
5 Jerome Williams ® (D.L.)
Leaving them now with most likely the worst rotation in MLB history.
Speigner looked pretty solid yesterday... a good number of those HRs fell just short..
#41
Posted 24 May 2007 - 05:14 PM
Bacsik with a solid game, until that last predictable mistake.. can the good guys hang on to take 3/4 from the shukies?
Edited by JZilla, 24 May 2007 - 08:09 PM.
#42
Posted 24 May 2007 - 07:01 PM
4-5-1 double play was interesting...
Bacsik with a solid game, until that last predictable mistake.. can the good guys hang on to take 3/4 from the shukies?
SMB,G
Owning Otis in werewolf since 2010.
I hate signatures, but love irony.
#43
Posted 24 May 2007 - 08:08 PM
4-5-1 double play was interesting...
Bacsik with a solid game, until that last predictable mistake.. can the good guys hang on to take 3/4 from the shukies?
SMB,G
10 wins in 14 games by my count, that's a nice little flukish run. Now let's get back to business, 121 ain't going to lose themselves.
#44
Posted 25 May 2007 - 06:00 PM
#45
Posted 27 May 2007 - 03:39 PM
12 of 17 now.10 wins in 14 games by my count, that's a nice little flukish run. Now let's get back to business, 121 ain't going to lose themselves.
#46
Posted 28 May 2007 - 12:33 PM
#47
Posted 28 May 2007 - 03:35 PM
Unfortunately I have a previous engagement, but I hope they get a good turnout and nice reception at home tomorrow... that was a real nice road trip and they're really starting to show that they've got a solid core of talent to build on. It's a good time for the city to get behind these guys.
Guzman's a new player, compared to two years ago. Young has filled in nicely for Nick Johnson. Nook is a nice threat at the bottom of the order. I hope he develops into a leadoff man; his speed is sick. And, hey, maybe Langerhans could hit cleanup.
School's still in session, so I doubt there will be much more than 25000 at a weeknight game despite their recent success, unless I'm underestimating the number of Dodger fans in the area. Fact is, they simply don't get a ton of coverage in the media and they don't do a whole lot to market themselves. I think they're just trying to get by this year until the new stadium next year.
#48
Posted 30 May 2007 - 04:26 PM
#49
Posted 30 May 2007 - 04:39 PM
121 ain't going to lose themselves.
seriously, what the ####?
You're the moron claiming the Rays are going to be "winning games in '08".
#50
Posted 01 June 2007 - 06:00 AM
L 0-10
L 0-5
W 11-4
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








