What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bloom's Seven Round Mock (1 Viewer)

Interesting to see Grubbs fall out of the 1st round (first time I've seen that) and still end up in Chicago. They might as well sign him now :mellow:

Love the 2.43 pick - Syndey Rice to Buffalo. Great #2 to Evans.

I have a hard time seeing Stanton slip past KC in the 2nd, but Smith makes sense there.

Figurs is higher than I'd imagine, but he can be a Dante Hall type KR/PR.

Sleeper alert: 131. Indianapolis - Dave Ball, WR, New Hampshire

You left Jon Cornish out. I'd be surprised if he isn't picked up by a team looking for a 3rd down back.

 
Nice job. It seems that most mocks now have either Detroit or Oakland taking Trent Edwards at 2.01 or 2.02. If his stock is really rising I can see someone trading up with a team like the Pats at #28 to ensure they get him.

 
Interesting draft for Miami.

Levi is :mellow:

Ray Macdonald is a beast

Lo Booker is a nice pick, but I am not sure if this is really a need...

Kolb!!!!!!!!

At this point the phins would get an A in my book.

Add in another DT in Johnson, and us using one of our 6th rounders (or both of them) to get trent green and the rebuilding process is pretty much accomplished in 1 draft.

 
amazing stuff big guy. The time and commitment you spend on the draft is just incredible. Cheers to Bloom! :mellow:

 
Hey Bloom, great stuff :mellow:

Can you tell me something brief about Tennessee CB Jonathan Wade, who you projected to the Lions in round 2. I am mainly interested in how he fits in the cover 2 defense.

 
i'm bored...

Code:
ARI	 5	 Adrian, Peterson, RB	38	Lawrence, Timmons, OLB	69	Marshall, Yanda, OT/OG	105   Dashon, Goldson, DB	142   DeAndre, Jackson, CB	215   Mike, DeVito, DTATL	 8	 LaRon, Landry, S	39	Dwayne, Jarrett, WR	44	Tony, Ugoh, OT	75	Dan, Bazuin, DE	109   Michael, Bush, RB	121   Mason, Crosby, K	133   Blades, LB, Pittsburgh	149   Gabe, Hall, OT	185   Dante, Rosario, TE/HB	244   Kyle, Shotwell, LBBAL	 29	Joe, Staley, OT	61	Drew, Stanton, QB	134   McDonald,, CB, Memphis	137   Pitcock,, DT, Ohio	166   Laurent, Robinson, WR	174   Jacob, Bender, OT	203   Kasey, Studdard, OG	207   Greg, Peterson, DEBUF	 12	Patrick, Willis, LB	43	Sidney, Rice, WR	74	Antonio, Pittman, RB	92	Josh, Beekman, G/C	111   Anthony, Arline, CB	184   Martrez, Milner, TE	222   Toby, Korrodi, QB	239   Matt, Trannon, WRCAR	 14	Greg, Olsen, TE	45	David, Harris, LB	83	Aaron, Rouse, S	118   Kevin, Payne, S	155   Julius, Wilson, OT	191   Tyler, Palko, QB	226   Ryne, Robinson, WR/KRCHI	 31	Justin, Harrell, DT	37	Ben, Grubbs, OG	94	Daymeion, Hughes, CB	130   Kevin, Boss, TE	168   Brandon, Myles, WR	221   Stephen, Nicholas, LB	241   Jonathan, Palmer, OLCIN	 18	Chris, Houston, CB	49	Rufus, Alexander, LB	114   Yamon, Figurs, WR/KR	151   Mario, Henderson, OT	187   Jordan, Palmer, QB	230   Kolby, Smith, RB	253   Jeremy, Clark, DTCLE	 3	 JaMarcus, Russell, QB	36	Anthony, Spencer, OLB/DE	67	Michael, Coe, CB	103   Ryan, McBean, DL	140   Reggie, Lewis, CB	178   Dwayne, Wright, RB	213   Walter, Thomas, NTDAL	 22	Leon, Hall, CB	53	Anthony, Gonzalez, WR	87	Manuel, Ramirez, OG	122   Mike, Otto, OT	159   Jacob, Ford, DE/OLB	195	Justin, Medlock, K	200	Matt, Gutierrez, QB	212	Scott, Stephenson, C	234	Melvin, Bullitt, S	237	Quentin, Echols, NTDEN	21	Charles, Johnson, DE	56	Brandon, Meriweather, S	70	Johnnie, Lee Higgins, WR	86	Allen, Barbre, OT/OG	176	Ahmad, Bradshaw, RB	198	Marvin, White, S	233	Marquise, Cole, CBDET	2	Gaines, Adams, DE	34	Johnathan, Wade, CB	66	Justin, Durant, LB	101	James, Marten, OT	139	John, Wendling, S	145	Bo, Smith, CB	154	Chansi, Stuckey, WR	158	Clifton, Ryan, DT	255	Jeff, Samardzija, WRGBP	16	Marshawn, Lynch, RB	47	Tanard, Jackson, DB	78	Travarous, Bain, CB	112	Jacoby, Jones, WR	157	Scott, Chandler, TE	193	Herb, Taylor, OL	228	C.J., Ah You, DE	235	Tony, Taylor, LB	243	Rhema, McKnight, WRHOU	10	Alan, Branch, DT	73	Tim, Crowder, DE	107	Mike, Walker, WR	144	Brandon, Frye, OT	183	John, Bowie, CB	218	Rashad, Barksdale, SIND	32	Tank, Tyler, DT	95	Fred, Bennett, CB	98	Tony, Hunt, RB	131	Dave, Ball, WR	136	Davis,, WR, Florida	169	Eric, Frampton, S	173	Quincy, Black, OLB	242	Xsavie, Jackson, DEJAX	17	Reggie, Nelson, S	48	Ikaika, Alama-Francis, DE	79	Courtney, Brown, CB	113	Mansfield, Wrotto, G/T	150	Anthony, Waters, ILB	194	Brandon, Harrison, S	229	Daniel, Parrish, OT	251	Legedu, Naanee, WR	252	Dallas, Baker, WRKCC	23	Ryan, Kalil, C	54	Steve, Smith, WR	84	Brandon, Mebane, DT	160	Adam, Koets, OT	196	Marvin, Mitchell, LB	231	Joe, Porter, CBMIA	9	Levi, Brown, OT	40	Ray, McDonald, DL	60	Lorenzo, Booker, RB	71	Kevin, Kolb, QB	108	Antonio, Johnson, DT	181	Steve, Breaston, WR/KR	199	Nathan, Bennett, OG	219	Enoka, Lucas, C	238	Juwan, Simpson, LBMIN	7	Brady, Quinn, QB	41	Jason, Hill, WR	72	Victor, Abiamiri, DE	106	Sabby, Piscitelli, S	146	C.J., Wilson, CB	182	Courtney, Taylor, WR	217	Jackie, Battle, RBNEP	24	Jon, Beason, LB	28	Brian, Leonard, RB	91	Kenny, Scott, CB	127	Usama, Young, CB	171	Chad, Nkang, S	180	Desmond, Bishop, ILB	202	Brian, Smith, OLB/DE	208	Kyle, Young, OL	209	Jared, Zabransky, QB/UTIL	247	Steve, Vallos, OLNOS	27	Robert, Meachem, WR	58	Brandon, Siler, LB	88	Troy, Smith, QB	123	Baraka, Atkins, DL	125	Corey, Graham, CB	126	Earl, Everett, OLB	163	Joe, Anoai, DT	220	Joe, Newton, TENYG	20	Paul, Posluszny, LB	51	Josh, Wilson, CB	81	Ryan, Harris, OT	116	Dustin, Fry, OL	153	Matt, Spaeth, TE	189	James, Jones, WR	224	Corey, Hilliard, OT	250	Nick, Folk, KNYJ	25	Aaron, Ross, CB	59	Quentin, Moses, OLB/DE	63	Zach, Miller, TE	89	Paul, Soliai, DT	164	Tim, Shaw, OLB/DE	177	T.J., Downing, OGOAK	1	Calvin, Johnson, WR	33	Trent, Edwards, QB	65	Marcus, Thomas, DT	99	Chris, Henry, RB	100	Doug, Free, OT	138	Isaiah, Stanback, QB/UTIL	165	Jonny, Harline, TE	175	Geoffrey, Pope, CB	211	Sam, Olajubutu, OLB	254	Brian, Smith, OLB/DEPHI	26	Jarvis, Moss, DE	57	Eric, Weddle, S	90	John, Beck, QB	162	Michael, Allan, TE	201	Nate, Harris, LB	236	Justise, Hairston, RBPIT	15	Darrelle, Revis, CB	46	Arron, Sears, OL	77	Samson, Satele, C	119	Jay, Alford, DT	132	Stewart, Bradley, LB	156	Antwan, Barnes, OLB	170	Jeff, Rowe, QB	192	Ronnie, McGill, RB	227	Ryan, Sepulveda, PSDC	30	Dwayne, Bowe, WR	62	A.J., Davis, CB	93	Josh, Gattis, S	96	Tim, Duckworth, OG	129	Brandon, Jackson, RB	167	Zak, DeOssie, ILB	172	Chris, Denman, OT	240	Craig, Dahl, SSF	11	Adam, Carriker, DE	42	Justin, Blalock, OL	76	LaMarr, Woodley, DE	97	David, Clowney, WR	104	Leroy, Harris, OL	110	Paul, Williams, WR	124	Ryan, Smith, CB	135	Okwo,, LB, Stanford	147	DeShawn, Wynn, RB	186	Keith, Jackson, DTSEA	55	David, Irons, CB	85	Ben, Patrick, TE	120	Michael, Johnson, S	161	Cameron, Stephenson, OG	197	Rory, Johnson, OLB	210	Jermon, Bushrod, OTSTL	13	Jamaal, Anderson, DE	52	Marcus, McCauley, CB	82	Aundrae, Allison, WR	117	Doug, Datish, G/C	148	Darius, Walker, RB	190	Kareem, Brown, DT	225	Jon, Abbate, LB	248	Keenan, Carter, DT	249	Chase, Johnson, OTTBB	4	Joe, Thomas, OT	35	Michael, Griffin, S	64	Turk, McBride, DT	68	Craig, Davis, WR	102	Andy, Alleman, OG	141	Jay, Moore, DE	214	Calvin, Bannister, CB	245	Marcus, Hamilton, CB	246	Uche, Nwaneri, OGTEN	19	Ted, Ginn Jr., WR/KR	50	Eric, Wright, CB	80	Kenny, Irons, RB	115	Daren, Stone, S	128	Brian, Robison, DE	152	Mike, Jones, OL	188	Larry, Anam, CB	204	Derek, Landri, DL	206	Stephon, Heyer, OT	223	Noland, Burchette, OLB/DEWAS	6	Amobi, Okoye, DT	143	Tala, Esera, OL	179	Marcus, Paschal, S	205	C.J., Gaddis, DB	216	Antwan, Applewhite, DE
 
It'll be very interesting to see if CLE selects Russell or Quinn if they're both there. with Quinn being labeled as the "safer" pick, the OH native who wants to play for them, and the way Weiss is hyping him to Crennell (said he was a combo of Brady & Peyton) it may be tough for Crennell to ignore all that. If you were Crennell, who's opinion could you trust more than Weiss??

Insane effort here Bloom, well done. :popcorn:

 
It'll be very interesting to see if CLE selects Russell or Quinn if they're both there. with Quinn being labeled as the "safer" pick, the OH native who wants to play for them, and the way Weiss is hyping him to Crennell (said he was a combo of Brady & Peyton) it may be tough for Crennell to ignore all that. If you were Crennell, who's opinion could you trust more than Weiss??

Insane effort here Bloom, well done. :popcorn:
talk about being set up to fail. sheesh....
 
It'll be very interesting to see if CLE selects Russell or Quinn if they're both there. with Quinn being labeled as the "safer" pick, the OH native who wants to play for them, and the way Weiss is hyping him to Crennell (said he was a combo of Brady & Peyton) it may be tough for Crennell to ignore all that. If you were Crennell, who's opinion could you trust more than Weiss??

Insane effort here Bloom, well done. :popcorn:
talk about being set up to fail. sheesh....
No kidding. NFL Radio asked Quinn about that comment and he said it was probably the largest compliment he's ever received coming from a coach that's actually had the opportunity to be around talent like that. The more I listened the more I tend to agree that Weiss saying something like that, with his credentials, may really mean something and not just be a coach trying to pimp his QB. That'd be pretty wrong to say things like that trying to convince one of your buddies to take him just to promote your program and recruitment. Lol.
 
It'll be very interesting to see if CLE selects Russell or Quinn if they're both there. with Quinn being labeled as the "safer" pick, the OH native who wants to play for them, and the way Weiss is hyping him to Crennell (said he was a combo of Brady & Peyton) it may be tough for Crennell to ignore all that. If you were Crennell, who's opinion could you trust more than Weiss??

Insane effort here Bloom, well done. :popcorn:
talk about being set up to fail. sheesh....
Why don't we just say he's better than John Elway, Dan Marino and Johnny Unitas? If I'm Crennell, it's my team and I'll make the decisions, so I don't need my buddy selling me his QB.

 
It'll be very interesting to see if CLE selects Russell or Quinn if they're both there. with Quinn being labeled as the "safer" pick, the OH native who wants to play for them, and the way Weiss is hyping him to Crennell (said he was a combo of Brady & Peyton) it may be tough for Crennell to ignore all that. If you were Crennell, who's opinion could you trust more than Weiss??

Insane effort here Bloom, well done. :popcorn:
talk about being set up to fail. sheesh....
Why don't we just say he's better than John Elway, Dan Marino and Johnny Unitas? If I'm Crennell, it's my team and I'll make the decisions, so I don't need my buddy selling me his QB.
I agree that it's way too early to say those sorts of things. However, if you're Crennell and have a need at QB you have to at least take into consideration the advice of someone that's as respected as Weiss and especially with the relationship they have. To just ignore the advice of someone that's worked with Quinn the way he has would be kind of foolish.I'm not saying I think CLE should take him, I personally think they need to take Peterson, just that it puts Crennell in kind of a tough spot if Quinn & Russell are there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
GBP 16 Marshawn, Lynch, RB 47 Tanard, Jackson, DB 78 Travarous, Bain, CB 112 Jacoby, Jones, WR 157 Scott, Chandler, TE 193 Herb, Taylor, OL 228 C.J., Ah You, DE 235 Tony, Taylor, LB 243 Rhema, McKnight, WR
Bloom - great mock! 7 rounds, man this is unreal!Lynch in the 1st is a solid pick - he would be a good fit for the system.Not clear why you project two DBs in rounds 2-3. We already have Woodson and Harris - while we need a young guy to groom, it's a reach to take two DBs this early.I love the Jacoby Jones pick in rd. 4, would be thrilled to see GB get him. We need a TE who can make plays, Chandler Scott is a solid pick this late. Not much of a blocker, but can do more with the ball than Bubba Franks.After round 5, it hardlyl matters, although it seems worthwhile to use a pick on Rhema McKnight.Would rather see Green Bay pick these 4 spots in rounds 1-4 (in no particular order): RB, WR, DL, DB/S. So this mock is very close, just 1 too many at DB for my tastes.Great stuff!
 
amazing stuff big guy. The time and commitment you spend on the draft is just incredible. Cheers to Bloom! :banned:
double :thumbup: :thumbup: to the Bloom-meister!does Bloom sleep in April?

I think not...power nap, maybe, but no rest for the weary until early May!

FWIW...I think Savage takes Quinn over Russell, based on Ravens/Browns 'history' @the position--not saying it's right, just that there's been a pattern that I don't think Phil breaks here

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PHI 26 Jarvis, Moss, DE 57 Eric, Weddle, S 90 John, Beck, QB 162 Michael, Allan, TE 201 Nate, Harris, LB 236 Justise, Hairston, RB
If this is even close to accurate then Philly fans will be jumping off bridges again.A QB, a TE, and a RB that no one knows? With 6 picks, 4 should be on defense at a minimum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I'm Crennell, it's my team and I'll make the decisions, so I don't need my buddy selling me his QB.
I agree that it's way too early to say those sorts of things. However, if you're Crennell and have a need at QB you have to at least take into consideration the advice of someone that's as respected as Weiss and especially with the relationship they have. To just ignore the advice of someone that's worked with Quinn the way he has would be kind of foolish.I'm not saying I think CLE should take him, I personally think they need to take Peterson, just that it puts Crennell in kind of a tough spot if Quinn & Russell are there.
Call me jaded, but I won't take a player's head coach's advice on how good he will be. What's he going to say? "He'll beat the bad teams, but man, if he starts against Baltimore, he'll choke! He's not going to get you a championship, but he'll sell tickets..."
 
PHI 26 Jarvis, Moss, DE 57 Eric, Weddle, S 90 John, Beck, QB 162 Michael, Allan, TE 201 Nate, Harris, LB 236 Justise, Hairston, RB
If this is even close to accurate then Philly fans will be jumping off bridges again.A QB, a TE, and a RB that no one knows? With 6 picks, 4 should be on defense at a minimum.
I agree. I don't see a QB in the 3rd. Replace that pick with a D guy and I can see that happening.Thanks Bloom...good read.
 
Great job Bloom!One question: Why do you have Jason Hill going to the Vikings in round 2 instead of Sidney Rice?
I just figured that they might have a thing about avoiding South Carolina receivers rights now :thumbup: . Also, Hill is more ready to step in and start than Rice is.
 
HOU 10 Alan, Branch, DT 73 Tim, Crowder, DE 107 Mike, Walker, WR 144 Brandon, Frye, OT 183 John, Bowie, CB 218 Rashad, Barksdale, S
Not sure if this draft would excite as a Texan, especially in the short term. The first nine players could very well go off the board in that manner leaving us to guess at who the Texans have rated as the number 10 prospect.Branch would give the Texans a 4th straight 1 round pick on the DL and another player with huge physical talent who has not played to level of skill. Very boom or bust. Crowder- I am not sure that he has displayed to pure, consistent pass rushing skills that are needed across from Mario Williams, but at least a college player has a history of improving production though w/o dynamic sack totals. The pick with the least questions, but also may have some limit to his upside. More solid than spectacular and maybe a better LE than blindside rusher. Walker- Extremely physically talented and maybe the be "value" in this list. he has had the production to match and would be in a spot to be an immediate impact if healthy.Frye- Only a one year starter on the OL, but athletic enough for the zone systemBowie- athletic, but raw in techniqueBaksdale- athletic, but raw, only one year of college footballOverall, good job of finding athletes at positions of direct need, but I am not sure of the immediate impact that this draft would have. Would not excite the average fan, and one would need a ton of patience while the prospects develop. More boom or bust than I would personally want to see from the Texans.
 
Interesting to see Grubbs fall out of the 1st round (first time I've seen that) and still end up in Chicago. They might as well sign him now :thumbup:Love the 2.43 pick - Syndey Rice to Buffalo. Great #2 to Evans.I have a hard time seeing Stanton slip past KC in the 2nd, but Smith makes sense there.Figurs is higher than I'd imagine, but he can be a Dante Hall type KR/PR. Sleeper alert: 131. Indianapolis - Dave Ball, WR, New HampshireYou left Jon Cornish out. I'd be surprised if he isn't picked up by a team looking for a 3rd down back.
I had KC taking Troy Smith in the 3rd for a while when I was staring at this thing, but in the end I decided that they like Croyle enough to forgo an early QB this year.Figurs was one of the hardest single players to slot.Cornish is nothing special and I think he'd be best served going to Canada anyway - he could definitely get drafted.
 
Hey Bloom, great stuff :thumbup: Can you tell me something brief about Tennessee CB Jonathan Wade, who you projected to the Lions in round 2. I am mainly interested in how he fits in the cover 2 defense.
He might not be the best cover 2 fit at this point, he needs to become more hardnosed, but he could be a playmaker and shutdown type corner with some more development. I grant that they could get better fits for the cover2 than Wade, but not someone with more upside.
 
GBP 16 Marshawn, Lynch, RB 47 Tanard, Jackson, DB 78 Travarous, Bain, CB 112 Jacoby, Jones, WR 157 Scott, Chandler, TE 193 Herb, Taylor, OL 228 C.J., Ah You, DE 235 Tony, Taylor, LB 243 Rhema, McKnight, WR
Bloom - great mock! 7 rounds, man this is unreal!Lynch in the 1st is a solid pick - he would be a good fit for the system.Not clear why you project two DBs in rounds 2-3. We already have Woodson and Harris - while we need a young guy to groom, it's a reach to take two DBs this early.I love the Jacoby Jones pick in rd. 4, would be thrilled to see GB get him. We need a TE who can make plays, Chandler Scott is a solid pick this late. Not much of a blocker, but can do more with the ball than Bubba Franks.After round 5, it hardlyl matters, although it seems worthwhile to use a pick on Rhema McKnight.Would rather see Green Bay pick these 4 spots in rounds 1-4 (in no particular order): RB, WR, DL, DB/S. So this mock is very close, just 1 too many at DB for my tastes.Great stuff!
Jackson gives them all kinds of versatility in the secondary, and he can play nickel for now and eventually become Collins partner at safety. Bain is rawer, maybe not ready to play nickel/dime this year but has the speed and hips to become a very good cover corner. That was my thinking - they have to start planning for the time without Harris, and they have to plan for not having a possible partner for Collins with upside on the roster (I would assume they want to upgrade from Manuel, although I could be giving Underwood short shrift here.
 
The first 3 rds for Denver would be awesome, don't know much about the rd 4-7 players. But I think they will pick a DT at some point in the draft, preferably a mammoth. You rock :thumbup:

 
PHI 26 Jarvis, Moss, DE 57 Eric, Weddle, S 90 John, Beck, QB 162 Michael, Allan, TE 201 Nate, Harris, LB 236 Justise, Hairston, RB
If this is even close to accurate then Philly fans will be jumping off bridges again.A QB, a TE, and a RB that no one knows? With 6 picks, 4 should be on defense at a minimum.
I suppose Beck to Philly is a strange projection, I just liked him replace Garcia as the long term "in case of injury, break glass" guy, and I think he'll take to the Philly offense very very well, but it wasn't standard.Philly never drafts for the immediate future, I imagine they will be taking at least a few players that "no one knows".
 
HOU 10 Alan, Branch, DT 73 Tim, Crowder, DE 107 Mike, Walker, WR 144 Brandon, Frye, OT 183 John, Bowie, CB 218 Rashad, Barksdale, S
Not sure if this draft would excite as a Texan, especially in the short term. The first nine players could very well go off the board in that manner leaving us to guess at who the Texans have rated as the number 10 prospect.Branch would give the Texans a 4th straight 1 round pick on the DL and another player with huge physical talent who has not played to level of skill. Very boom or bust. Crowder- I am not sure that he has displayed to pure, consistent pass rushing skills that are needed across from Mario Williams, but at least a college player has a history of improving production though w/o dynamic sack totals. Thttp://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?act=Post&CODE=02&f=2&t=313750&qpid=6617019he pick with the least questions, but also may have some limit to his upside. More solid than spectacular and maybe a better LE than blindside rusher. Walker- Extremely physically talented and maybe the be "value" in this list. he has had the production to match and would be in a spot to be an immediate impact if healthy.Frye- Only a one year starter on the OL, but athletic enough for the zone systemBowie- athletic, but raw in techniqueBaksdale- athletic, but raw, only one year of college footballOverall, good job of finding athletes at positions of direct need, but I am not sure of the immediate impact that this draft would have. Would not excite the average fan, and one would need a ton of patience while the prospects develop. More boom or bust than I would personally want to see from the Texans.
It's tough to make a satisfying looking draft for Houston without a 2nd. Walker and Crowder are the guys I see helping right now, although I agree that maybe a pure pass rusher could be a better 3rd round DE for them. I went with raw DBs who could project to be good starter in year 2-3 rather than guys who could step and help now, but with limited upside.Of course, the new regime is tough to read, Rick Smith wasn't hired until June.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
While I like both Beason and Leonard I really hope (and expect) the Pats to use a #1 in the defensive backfield. Right now that is their biggest need (along with LB depth) and there will be players that can make an impact right away. Leonard is very intriguing and I'd have no problems adding him but right now he's more of a luxury they can live without. DB depth is not.

 
While I like both Beason and Leonard I really hope (and expect) the Pats to use a #1 in the defensive backfield. Right now that is their biggest need (along with LB depth) and there will be players that can make an impact right away. Leonard is very intriguing and I'd have no problems adding him but right now he's more of a luxury they can live without. DB depth is not.
That's why I have them going CB-CB-S in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, but hey, it's NE, so I'm truly guessing.
 
While I like both Beason and Leonard I really hope (and expect) the Pats to use a #1 in the defensive backfield. Right now that is their biggest need (along with LB depth) and there will be players that can make an impact right away. Leonard is very intriguing and I'd have no problems adding him but right now he's more of a luxury they can live without. DB depth is not.
That's why I have them going CB-CB-S in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, but hey, it's NE, so I'm truly guessing.
I agree that with the Pats it's absolutely impossible to guess. It doesn't matter how much you follow them come draft day anything goes.If the mocks have any truth (and we know they probably don't) I could see them trading up a few spots for Leon Hall. He seems to be slipping a bit and he could be in range for the Pats. I know they have been sniffing around the Michigan players (i.e. Woodley, Harris and Hall) and it wouldn't surprise me to see one drafted at some point.
 
Interesting to see Grubbs fall out of the 1st round (first time I've seen that) and still end up in Chicago. They might as well sign him now ;)Love the 2.43 pick - Syndey Rice to Buffalo. Great #2 to Evans.I have a hard time seeing Stanton slip past KC in the 2nd, but Smith makes sense there.Figurs is higher than I'd imagine, but he can be a Dante Hall type KR/PR. Sleeper alert: 131. Indianapolis - Dave Ball, WR, New HampshireYou left Jon Cornish out. I'd be surprised if he isn't picked up by a team looking for a 3rd down back.
I had KC taking Troy Smith in the 3rd for a while when I was staring at this thing, but in the end I decided that they like Croyle enough to forgo an early QB this year.Figurs was one of the hardest single players to slot.Cornish is nothing special and I think he'd be best served going to Canada anyway - he could definitely get drafted.
:cry: how did I forget Croyle? I still like the value in the 2ndMaybe not special, but a serviceable backup. Yes, I am a :hot:
 
I agree with the above that if the Pats are going to move up, it is to get a DB, although I think they covet Landry more than the others, and safety is a position of need.

Regrettably, I have to give a :hot: to the call of Zak DeOssie going late in the 5th round (167th overall). He is easily a top 10 LB prospect, even if he played against Ivy League competition at Brown. Call me biased, but I see him going in the first day. I would love to see the Pats snatch him in the 3rd.

 
Regrettably, I have to give a :hot: to the call of Zak DeOssie going late in the 5th round (167th overall). He is easily a top 10 LB prospect, even if he played against Ivy League competition at Brown. Call me biased, but I see him going in the first day. I would love to see the Pats snatch him in the 3rd.
This is not a bad call, and DeOssie was the players I really wanted to move up - he has added value as a special teams ace too. I came close to swapping him out with Okwo or Waters to move him up.I will admit that it is IMPOSSIBLE to read this over without seeing at least a few dozen picks that make me a bit squeamish - but this thing is like a moving target with a slippery slope. You can't change one pick without changing 10 others just to make the new pick fit.
 
Can't see the Chiefs taking a center over Robert Meachem (among many others).

It's not close to being their top need and he's not the best player available.

 
Can't see the Chiefs taking a center over Robert Meachem (among many others).It's not close to being their top need and he's not the best player available.
I really wanted Kalil to go in the first and I'll admit I kind of crammed him in there because there's not nearly as many good places for him to land in late first as there are in the mid first. I just believe he's first round quality, although Im probably imparting too much of my personal opinion by doing that. I do think Kalil becomes close to the BPA around the late first. He's one of the top 10 sure things in this draft imo, and possibly a better prospect than Mangold. I will say that I don't assume that teams will automatically fill their most pressing immediate need with their first, especially as you get later in the first.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can't see the Chiefs taking a center over Robert Meachem (among many others).It's not close to being their top need and he's not the best player available.
I really wanted Kalil to go in the first and I'll admit I kind of crammed him in there because there's nearly as many good places for him to land in late first as there are in the mid first. I just believe he's first round quality, although Im probably imparting too much of my personal opinion by doing that. I do think Kalil becomes close to the BPA around the late first. He's one of the top 10 sure things in this draft imo, and possibly a better prospect than Mangold. I will say that I don't assume that teams will automatically fill their most pressing immediate need with their first, especially as you get later in the first.
KC has rarely gone for need over talent.
 
Wow Bloom, you constantly impress me with what you do on this board. Excellent job and thanks for your hard work on this.

BUF 12 Patrick, Willis, LB 43 Sidney, Rice, WR 74 Antonio, Pittman, RB 92 Josh, Beekman, G/C 111 Anthony, Arline, CB 184 Martrez, Milner, TE 222 Toby, Korrodi, QB 239 Matt, Trannon, WR
I would be very, very excited if the Bills got this draft. I love the Rice pick in the 2nd if it could possibly happen, but I worry he might be gone by then. I think Pittman could do very well in a RBBC in Buffalo and could learn some much needed things from the coaching staff and A-Train. I'm not sure if I ever see him as a 200+ carry a season back, but those kind of backs are fading anyways. Josh Beekman could be another very nice pick for the Bills. I think alot is going to depend on the play of Walker and Pennington, but Beekman could fit in nicely with this new offensive line. But again very excellent job and keep up the incredible work.Oh, and just edited to add that I love the very last pick of the draft. I actually forgot about him and think it would be funny if he was the very last pick of the draft (considering where he was thought to have gone before baseball).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bloom, I like it, especially that first round. As is my modus operendi, I will offer some comments on the Jets.

CB in the first as you have it is perfect, especially if a player like Ross is still on the board. After that, I differ. I beleive the Jets will go offense, as I think they addressed the D in FA. Coleman will start in front of von Oelhoffen, Bowens from Miami will be an OLB. They also picked up Haynes and Wadsworth as long shots. They are happy with Robertson at NT, and rememeber, Sione Pouha appeared to have beaten Robertson out last year before he went down with a knee in camp. The front seven are already on the roster.

The TE position will be manned by Baker and Jason Pociask. Who the heck is Pociask? Good question. He was in a platoon with Owen at Wisconsin in 2005, and didn't put many numbers up, but was taken by the Jets at 5.16 last year before a shoulder injury put him on IR for the season in early August. He ran a 4.84 at the combine with a 4.32 20 yard shuttle time. He is a much better blocker than Baker at 6'3" and 267. Runs very good routes, has very good hands, but he certainly isn't a deep threat. Here is onre scouting report on him:

Pociask is a player that not much was expected from because he was not a full-time starter prior to his senior season and did not show the quickness or playing speed early on that was expected. On film, he looks taller than his listed height and has shown the ability to reach up and catch the high pass decently well. He has good playing strength, which enables him to consistently block defensive ends effectively on run blocks, and when he runs aggressively, he can break tackles to gain yards after contact.

He does not have the explosiveness or playing speed to stretch the field and make big catches deep down the field, but does run sharp routes and catches the ball well. An added bonus is that Pociask is a smart and versatile player who can line up and contribute in a variety of positions. Overall, Pociask is the type of tight end that often gets overlooked because he lacks top-end playing speed and is only 6-foot-2, but he is going to prove to be a solid NFL tight end. He has the talent to become a solid starting tight end whose versatility, toughness, smarts and competitiveness enable him to be a versatile contributor as an in-line tight end and in motion as an H-back.

Pociask is a Mangini pick, and a Mangini guy. He will provide an immediate improvement in run blocking in the Jets' offense. He is THE reason the Jets were so slow to re-sign Baker last year. Once he went down, they picked up Sean Ryan, a guy Parcells liked and told Mangini to get him.

People keep talking about the Jets needing a deep threat, and that's true, but it won't come from the TE position. I'll eat my hat if the Jets don't take a guard in the second round, and depending, a WR with speed. Coles is older than his chronological age, and McCariens is all but gone already. Brad Smith is a versatile slash type, but isn't Coles' eventual replacement. Kendall at LG is also getting up there, and the right side of the O line can't run block. The sleeper at RT is Ed Blanton, a UCLA 4 year starter... the kid was promoted from the taxi squad to the active roster for the playoff game against NE, so they like him.... at 6'7" and like 335, he's the biggest guy on the Jets roster.

So, I'd change up that second round for the Jets if it were my mock... after that, it's all about BPA.

 
Bloom, I like it, especially that first round. As is my modus operendi, I will offer some comments on the Jets. CB in the first as you have it is perfect, especially if a player like Ross is still on the board. After that, I differ. I beleive the Jets will go offense, as I think they addressed the D in FA. Coleman will start in front of von Oelhoffen, Bowens from Miami will be an OLB. They also picked up Haynes and Wadsworth as long shots. They are happy with Robertson at NT, and rememeber, Sione Pouha appeared to have beaten Robertson out last year before he went down with a knee in camp. The front seven are already on the roster. The TE position will be manned by Baker and Jason Pociask. Who the heck is Pociask? Good question. He was in a platoon with Owen at Wisconsin in 2005, and didn't put many numbers up, but was taken by the Jets at 5.16 last year before a shoulder injury put him on IR for the season in early August. He ran a 4.84 at the combine with a 4.32 20 yard shuttle time. He is a much better blocker than Baker at 6'3" and 267. Runs very good routes, has very good hands, but he certainly isn't a deep threat. Here is onre scouting report on him:Pociask is a player that not much was expected from because he was not a full-time starter prior to his senior season and did not show the quickness or playing speed early on that was expected. On film, he looks taller than his listed height and has shown the ability to reach up and catch the high pass decently well. He has good playing strength, which enables him to consistently block defensive ends effectively on run blocks, and when he runs aggressively, he can break tackles to gain yards after contact. He does not have the explosiveness or playing speed to stretch the field and make big catches deep down the field, but does run sharp routes and catches the ball well. An added bonus is that Pociask is a smart and versatile player who can line up and contribute in a variety of positions. Overall, Pociask is the type of tight end that often gets overlooked because he lacks top-end playing speed and is only 6-foot-2, but he is going to prove to be a solid NFL tight end. He has the talent to become a solid starting tight end whose versatility, toughness, smarts and competitiveness enable him to be a versatile contributor as an in-line tight end and in motion as an H-back. Pociask is a Mangini pick, and a Mangini guy. He will provide an immediate improvement in run blocking in the Jets' offense. He is THE reason the Jets were so slow to re-sign Baker last year. Once he went down, they picked up Sean Ryan, a guy Parcells liked and told Mangini to get him.People keep talking about the Jets needing a deep threat, and that's true, but it won't come from the TE position. I'll eat my hat if the Jets don't take a guard in the second round, and depending, a WR with speed. Coles is older than his chronological age, and McCariens is all but gone already. Brad Smith is a versatile slash type, but isn't Coles' eventual replacement. Kendall at LG is also getting up there, and the right side of the O line can't run block. The sleeper at RT is Ed Blanton, a UCLA 4 year starter... the kid was promoted from the taxi squad to the active roster for the playoff game against NE, so they like him.... at 6'7" and like 335, he's the biggest guy on the Jets roster. So, I'd change up that second round for the Jets if it were my mock... after that, it's all about BPA.
:goodposting: excellent info here. I'll definitely incorporate your thoughts here into the v2.0 if I can pull it off before the draft. I'll admit to forgetting about Pociask. It seems like your job this offseason is to convince all of us know-nothing-know-it-alls that the JETS won't take a TE on the first day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
PHI 26 Jarvis, Moss, DE

57 Eric, Weddle, S

90 John, Beck, QB

162 Michael, Allan, TE

201 Nate, Harris, LB

236 Justise, Hairston, RB
If this is even close to accurate then Philly fans will be jumping off bridges again.A QB, a TE, and a RB that no one knows?

With 6 picks, 4 should be on defense at a minimum.
I suppose Beck to Philly is a strange projection, I just liked him replace Garcia as the long term "in case of injury, break glass" guy, and I think he'll take to the Philly offense very very well, but it wasn't standard.

Philly never drafts for the immediate future, I imagine they will be taking at least a few players that "no one knows".
I agree with this statement and sentiment, and they way your mock broke down they kept losing out on players / talents. It just felt that they were chasing talent in this mock rather than going out and getting it.

I still think Philly goes S or LB in round one, but I'm wagering S is the call. LB / RB (Leonard) would be the 2nd pick and the third would be possibly Hunt, but more likely another DL with a slight chance of Ben Patrick.

I'll have to look again and see where you had him going.

 
186. San Francisco - Keith Jackson, DT, Arkansas

Bloom, did you get a good feel on him from your tour of the college bowls, and did Mike Singletary take a liking to him?

 
Nice work Sigmund. I really hope the Raiders take more OL than one in the fourth. Other than that, I liked how you put their draft together.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top