What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Broncos want Calvin Johnson (1 Viewer)

apkballa

Footballguy
Broncos Want Calvin Johnson

23rd April, 2007 - 1:54 pm

Denver Post - Mike Shanahan, Ted Sundquist and Jim Goodman of the Broncos are so enamored with receiver Calvin Johnson that they have attempted to acquire a pick to get him twice.

The first time, the Broncos proposed adding middle linebacker Al Wilson and their No. 21 overall pick as an extension to finalize a deal that sent Tatum Bell and George Foster to the Lions in exchange for Dré Bly. The second time, the Broncos offered picks in the first, second and third rounds, plus their first-round pick in 2008, for the Lions' No. 2 selection, a trade contingent on the Oakland Raiders not taking Johnson with their No. 1 choice.
http://www.realgmfootball.com/src_wiretap_...calvin_johnson/Do you guys think a trade between the lions and the broncos will go down between now and the draft? Or is this just talk?

 
The Shanahan era has been marked by lots of wheeling and dealing, although pulling off something of this magnitude would be impressive. I'm thinking this might be a ploy to attempt to make Branch fall even further.

 
I don't believe anything right now
:D First of all, everyone would like Calvin Johnson. So it isn't untrue so much as a shade of a lie.Which is to say, sure, he'd be a nice fit for a long time with Cutler.But I can't see the Broncos mortgaging the rest of the frakkin draft just to get him. It seems uncharacteristically daring and dangerous even for that team.I mean three picks (first day) and their first round next year? That's Millen-like in it's insanity. Unless they got something else back as well, IMO.We need a :smokescreen: smilie....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't believe anything right now
:goodposting: First of all, everyone would like Calvin Johnson. So it isn't untrue so much as a shade of a lie.Which is to say, sure, he'd be a nice fit for a long time with Cutler.But I can't see the Broncos mortgaging the rest of the frakkin draft just to get him. It seems uncharacteristically daring and dangerous even for that team.I mean three picks (first day) and their first round next year? That's Millen-like in it's insanity. Unless they got something else back as well, IMO.We need a :smokescreen: smilie....
I would say the Lions need a lot more considering they would fall from #2 to #21.
 
According to the draft pick value table, Broncos picks would be worth 2335 pionts assuming the Broncos pick is the #16 in 2008.

The Lions #2 pick is worth 2600 points.

 
That is a lot to give up but if he's the one of a kind player everyone believes he is then it's probably worth it.

 
According to the draft pick value table, Broncos picks would be worth 2335 pionts assuming the Broncos pick is the #16 in 2008.

The Lions #2 pick is worth 2600 points.
I realize that the draft chart says don't do it, but that would be a great deal for the Lions IMO.
The second time, the Broncos offered picks in the first, second and third rounds, plus their first-round pick in 2008, for the Lions' No. 2 selection, a trade contingent on the Oakland Raiders not taking Johnson with their No. 1 choice.
The lions are not 1 player away from making the playoffs, they are many. This would give them a lot of picks to fill much needed holes. If I was a lions fan I would love that trade because you could potentially add 4 starters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't believe anything right now
:whoosh: First of all, everyone would like Calvin Johnson. So it isn't untrue so much as a shade of a lie.Which is to say, sure, he'd be a nice fit for a long time with Cutler.But I can't see the Broncos mortgaging the rest of the frakkin draft just to get him. It seems uncharacteristically daring and dangerous even for that team.I mean three picks (first day) and their first round next year? That's Millen-like in it's insanity. Unless they got something else back as well, IMO.We need a :smokescreen: smilie....
I would say the Lions need a lot more considering they would fall from #2 to #21.
You're probably right -- easy to get caught up in just the Denver side of things -- but yeah, that's a steep drop - I just think this would be too expensive for either side.But stranger things have happened....
 
The Scientist said:
Donnybrook said:
According to the draft pick value table, Broncos picks would be worth 2335 pionts assuming the Broncos pick is the #16 in 2008.

The Lions #2 pick is worth 2600 points.
I realize that the draft chart says don't do it, but that would be a great deal for the Lions IMO.
The second time, the Broncos offered picks in the first, second and third rounds, plus their first-round pick in 2008, for the Lions' No. 2 selection, a trade contingent on the Oakland Raiders not taking Johnson with their No. 1 choice.
The lions are not 1 player away from making the playoffs, they are many. This would give them a lot of picks to fill much needed holes. If I was a lions fan I would love that trade because you could potentially add 4 starters.
That trade could make Detroit into a contender by next season - with the big if being if they can draft well. With 6 picks in the first 3 rounds, with none of them having huge bonuses, they'd be set for quite awhile. The 1st next year probably won't be high (in the 20's most likely) but it would still be a good player who they won't have to pay a lot. Frankly, I just can't see the Broncos pulling the trigger giving up that much.
 
Donnybrook said:
According to the draft pick value table, Broncos picks would be worth 2335 pionts assuming the Broncos pick is the #16 in 2008. The Lions #2 pick is worth 2600 points.
Who cares what the chart says? I think that the value table is over used and in many cases just wrong. I would jump at that deal if I were the Lions. I think its a great deal. Two firsts, a second, AND a thrid? Detroit needs a lot more than one player and WR is not as top priority there with Roy Williams there. Those four picks can help them more than just one player. As a Bears fan, I hope they blow their pick though :shrug:
 
I think Denver is trying to stir the pot, and create some false value to cause other teams to make trades personally.

 
Donnybrook said:
According to the draft pick value table, Broncos picks would be worth 2335 pionts assuming the Broncos pick is the #16 in 2008.

The Lions #2 pick is worth 2600 points.
Who cares what the chart says? I think that the value table is over used and in many cases just wrong. I would jump at that deal if I were the Lions. I think its a great deal. Two firsts, a second, AND a thrid? Detroit needs a lot more than one player and WR is not as top priority there with Roy Williams there. Those four picks can help them more than just one player. As a Bears fan, I hope they blow their pick though ;)
Kinda Reminds me of the Tony Dorsett trade. I would pass.
 
Denver Post - Mike Shanahan, Ted Sundquist and Jim Goodman of the Broncos are so enamored with receiver Calvin Johnson that they have attempted to acquire a pick to get him twice.
This sentence reads like they want to pick him two times....if that's the case, then I guess they must really want him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If, and I mean if the Broncos got CJ then Cutler's value would be very high. He's already a solid prospect after last year but you'd have to think he would jump to top 7 with CJ and Walker in the mix.

 
Banger said:
everyone wants C. Johnson but the Bronc's are too far down to realistically have a shot.
:rant: He'll go to Tampa.
... if Tampa trades up.I think it's becoming clearer and clearer that if the Raiders aren't just plain stupid they will either draft CJ and keep him or trade him on draft day (a la Eli Manning), or trade the pick to someone who wants him. There is just too much interest in him for them to leave him on the board and not get the value he could bring, and he SHOULD NOT still be on the board when the Lions' pick comes up.I said a week ago that TB will trade up with OAK to get CJ, and I still believe that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From PFT:

POSTED 4:56 p.m. EDT, April 23, 2007

BRONCOS WANT JOHNSON

A reader tells us that there's a rumor being reported on 950 AM in Denver that the Broncos are trying to make a play for the No. 2 overall pick in the draft, in an effort to land receiver Calvin Johnson.

A source with knowledge of the discussions tells us that the rumor is dead-on accurate, and that an offer has been made by the Broncos to the Lions.

Per the rumor and based on what we've heard, the Broncos have offered their first-round, second-round, and third-round pick in the 2007 draft and their first-rounder in 2008 for the No. 2 spot.

The Lions, we're told, are concerned that the No. 21 overall spot would put them too low to land one of the players whom they covet. The Lions' goal in trading down is/has been to get more picks, and to still get one of the players they want, but at a lower salary slot.

So the deal might hinge on the ability of the Lions to line up another deal that would allow them to move back up a bit.

The Broncos hold the No. 21 overall pick in round one, the No. 56 overall pick (No. 24 in round two), and the No. 70 and No. 86 overall picks (No. 6 and No. 23, respectively, in round two). We don't know which of the third-rounders has been offered.

Under the trade chart, the deal might favor the Lions. But different teams value picks from the next year's draft differently; some teams downgrade the points by a full round, making a 2007 first-rounder the equivalent of a 2008 secon-rounder. The other problem here is that no one will know where the Broncos draft in round one until the 2007 season ends.

The entire deal would be contingent on the Raiders not drafting Calvin Johnson with the No. 1 overall pick. We're currently told that the Raiders are expected to strike a deal on a contract with quarterback JaMarcus Russell before Saturday.

However, the fact that former Raiders coach/current Broncos coach Mike Shanahan apparently has a bee in his butt for Johnson could cause Raiders owner Al Davis to think twice about whether he would prefer to have Johnson on his team -- or to have to face him twice per year.

------------------------

****.

I don't want to give up that much for Johnson. BTW, that last part really makes me think that Shanny wants to force the raiders to pick him or trade the pick away for somebody else to get him.

 
1) PFT is now "confirming" this story

2) Dropping to #21 isn't that big a deal. If the Lions really like a top 15 player they can always trade back up and get their guy. The Skins did this years ago after trading down with the Saints...and they ended up getting Champ Bailey.

 
There is no reason for Denver to draft a WR with all the huge holes they have on D-line and LB.

I simply don't get this, and I think it has to be a ploy.

 
Nah, too much of a drop IMO. Not to mention, Denver's first rounder next year will be in the 20's again, so it's not THAT great of one...

 
cstu said:
Not good for EEEEEEEEEEE owners though. ;)
:lmao: Yeah, what's Bloom's take on this rumor anyway.Every team in the league should want Calvin Johnson. That's not news. What IS news is hearing some of what Denver has reportedly offered for the right to move up and get him. Denver with Cutler, Henry, Walker, C. Johnson and Graham would be FIERCE from the standpoint of offensive skill positions. If that happened and I were in the AFC West....AND the team keeps both Bailey and Bly, I'd be :lmao:
 
Donnybrook said:
According to the draft pick value table, Broncos picks would be worth 2335 pionts assuming the Broncos pick is the #16 in 2008. The Lions #2 pick is worth 2600 points.
Next year's pick is usually discounted significantly, often by an entire round. After all, a draft pick today is worth more than a draft pick next year, no? Time value of draft pick...
 
cstu said:
Not good for EEEEEEEEEEE owners though. :yes:
:shrug: Yeah, what's Bloom's take on this rumor anyway.Every team in the league should want Calvin Johnson. That's not news. What IS news is hearing some of what Denver has reportedly offered for the right to move up and get him. Denver with Cutler, Henry, Walker, C. Johnson and Graham would be FIERCE from the standpoint of offensive skill positions. If that happened and I were in the AFC West....AND the team keeps both Bailey and Bly, I'd be :whistle:
No, I'd just run right at them up the gut and keep that O off the field as well as the ball away from ball hawking CBs. ;)
 
radballs said:
Moot point. CJ won't make it past Oakland or the team they trade with.
What has occurred to me is that this rumor may be Shanny's way of goading Al Davis into taking CJ, which he may believe (and I do believe) would be a stupid move for a team that has as many needs as Oakland does.
 
radballs said:
Moot point. CJ won't make it past Oakland or the team they trade with.
What has occurred to me is that this rumor may be Shanny's way of goading Al Davis into taking CJ, which he may believe (and I do believe) would be a stupid move for a team that has as many needs as Oakland does.
Davis has been involved in drafts forever. He'll make his decisions based on what the thinks will make his team better, not anything Shanahan is saying or doing. To think there's all this intrigue going on between those two guys is just nonsense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1) PFT is now "confirming" this story2) Dropping to #21 isn't that big a deal. If the Lions really like a top 15 player they can always trade back up and get their guy. The Skins did this years ago after trading down with the Saints...and they ended up getting Champ Bailey.
Trading up should not be too hard. There are more teams wanting to trade down that up. The Redskins could be a good candidate for the Redskins to trade up. And the Redskins have shown that they like to wheel and deal and have no problems getting into three way trades.
 
radballs said:
Moot point. CJ won't make it past Oakland or the team they trade with.
What has occurred to me is that this rumor may be Shanny's way of goading Al Davis into taking CJ, which he may believe (and I do believe) would be a stupid move for a team that has as many needs as Oakland does.
Davis has been involved in drafts forever. He'll make his decisions based on what the thinks will make his team better, not anything Shanahan is saying or doing. To think there's all this intrigue going on between those two guys is just nonsense.
Sure, I mean what you see is what you get with Allen, right? :thumbup:
 
1) PFT is now "confirming" this story2) Dropping to #21 isn't that big a deal. If the Lions really like a top 15 player they can always trade back up and get their guy. The Skins did this years ago after trading down with the Saints...and they ended up getting Champ Bailey.
Trading up should not be too hard. There are more teams wanting to trade down that up. The Redskins could be a good candidate for the Redskins to trade up. And the Redskins have shown that they like to wheel and deal and have no problems getting into three way trades.
Unless the Redskins are dealing players (unlikely) I don't think they've got the goods to trade up.
 
radballs said:
Moot point. CJ won't make it past Oakland or the team they trade with.
What has occurred to me is that this rumor may be Shanny's way of goading Al Davis into taking CJ, which he may believe (and I do believe) would be a stupid move for a team that has as many needs as Oakland does.
Or to make him think he is goading him into taking CJ so he doesn't take CJ and trade with TBAY (which could enable Davis to rebuild very quickly) and of course Davis thinks this is what Shanahan is thinking too so then Al won't think that is really what Shanahan is thinking so therefore........... :wall:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1) PFT is now "confirming" this story2) Dropping to #21 isn't that big a deal. If the Lions really like a top 15 player they can always trade back up and get their guy. The Skins did this years ago after trading down with the Saints...and they ended up getting Champ Bailey.
Trading up should not be too hard. There are more teams wanting to trade down that up. The Redskins could be a good candidate for the Redskins to trade up. And the Redskins have shown that they like to wheel and deal and have no problems getting into three way trades.
Unless the Redskins are dealing players (unlikely) I don't think they've got the goods to trade up.
I guess I wasn't clear. If the Lions trade down to No. 21, they should have no problems finding a trading partner to get back up. The Redskins could be a good candidate. I was trying to figure out if the Redskins would be happy at No. 21. They may be, since there is supposed to be good depth at DE in the draft.
 
radballs said:
Moot point. CJ won't make it past Oakland or the team they trade with.
What has occurred to me is that this rumor may be Shanny's way of goading Al Davis into taking CJ, which he may believe (and I do believe) would be a stupid move for a team that has as many needs as Oakland does.
Davis has been involved in drafts forever. He'll make his decisions based on what the thinks will make his team better, not anything Shanahan is saying or doing. To think there's all this intrigue going on between those two guys is just nonsense.
Sure, I mean what you see is what you get with Allen, right? :wall:
I just enjoyed calling something you had to say nonsense Redman. :hot: Who is Allen? Is that Al's name? I always thought it was Alvin.
 
radballs said:
Moot point. CJ won't make it past Oakland or the team they trade with.
What has occurred to me is that this rumor may be Shanny's way of goading Al Davis into taking CJ, which he may believe (and I do believe) would be a stupid move for a team that has as many needs as Oakland does.
Davis has been involved in drafts forever. He'll make his decisions based on what the thinks will make his team better, not anything Shanahan is saying or doing. To think there's all this intrigue going on between those two guys is just nonsense.
Sure, I mean what you see is what you get with Allen, right? :wall:
I just enjoyed calling something you had to say nonsense Redman. :D Who is Allen? Is that Al's name? I always thought it was Alvin.
I originally typed "Albert" before I looked it up and found Wiki saying his name was Allen. :hot: As for the nonsense crack, get in line. :)
 
1) PFT is now "confirming" this story2) Dropping to #21 isn't that big a deal. If the Lions really like a top 15 player they can always trade back up and get their guy. The Skins did this years ago after trading down with the Saints...and they ended up getting Champ Bailey.
Trading up should not be too hard. There are more teams wanting to trade down that up. The Redskins could be a good candidate for the Redskins to trade up. And the Redskins have shown that they like to wheel and deal and have no problems getting into three way trades.
Unless the Redskins are dealing players (unlikely) I don't think they've got the goods to trade up.
I guess I wasn't clear. If the Lions trade down to No. 21, they should have no problems finding a trading partner to get back up. The Redskins could be a good candidate. I was trying to figure out if the Redskins would be happy at No. 21. They may be, since there is supposed to be good depth at DE in the draft.
Gotcha. I'd love if they did something like that, but I'm skeptical. The value in this draft, outside of the top two picks, is in the lower half of the first through the third, and maybe lower . . . precisely the part of the draft the 'Skins are trying to move into. I'm not sure they're going to have a lot of luck trading down unless their 1.06 rolls around on draft day with Quinn or Peterson still on the board.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top