What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

***hyper/active 2 dynasty drafts*** (1 Viewer)

dirtyhalos

dirtyhalos

capital letter hater!
hyper/active 2 - staff vs posters league

staff...........bloom, pasquino, grant, wood

posters.......jeter23, wannabee, dirtyhalos, couch potato, team legacy, beaumont, ministry of pain, coolnerd, bri, undercover brotha, lions327, datonn, acer

breakdown:

- draft starts tuesday (vets & rookies combined), may 2nd :lmao:

- dual 12 team leagues

- scoring: 4pts passing tds, 6pts rushing/receiving tds, ppr

- 26 man rosters

- start.....qb, rb, wr, wr, te, k, d, 2 flex

Hyper Draft

Active Draft

i dont know all the posters, so please let me know who i'm leaving off

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like the moves I've made so far.

Having been dealt the 1.10, I really didn't have the "leverage" of some, but as I've said before, dynasty trading takes patience.

Evaluate my trades for me:

TRADE #1:

Detroit Demolishers gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 3.04

Year 2007 Draft Pick 8.09

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.04

Team Legacy gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 4.03

Year 2007 Draft Pick 5.10

Year 2007 Draft Pick 11.10

This was Step 1. Acquiring a Top 28 pick. The pick at 39 is OKAY, but I see a big difference in 28 to 39. I'll take an 8 and a 9 and give up my 5 and 11.

TRADE # 2:

The Others gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 2.08

Year 2007 Draft Pick 3.05

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.05

Team Legacy gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 1.10

Year 2007 Draft Pick 6.03

Year 2007 Draft Pick 10.03

Here I give up my 10 pick for the 20, but in return, I add another 3rd rounder and a 9 for my 6 and 10.

So I've basically got 2 2s, 3 3s, NO 4, NO 5 and NO 6, a 7, 2 8s and 3 9s... There's a huge gap after my dominant FAB 5, so I have to do something...

TRADE # 3:

Team Legacy gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 8.03

Year 2007 Draft Pick 8.09

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.04

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.05

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.10

Fly Igglz Fly gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 6.07

Year 2007 Draft Pick 7.06

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.06

Year 2007 Draft Pick 15.06

Year 2007 Draft Pick 16.07

So where there once was a gap, there is now none. I now have a 6, 2 7s, NO 8 and a 9.

2.3

2.8

3.4

3.5

3.10 >> This is a SOLID start. I have 5 picks by 3.10, so I really don't need a 4th or 5th rounder.

6.7

7.6

7.10 >> Solid picks with these will leave me with 8 spots filled.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Team Legacy said:
I like the moves I've made so far.

Having been dealt the 1.10, I really didn't have the "leverage" of some, but as I've said before, dynasty trading takes patience.

Evaluate my trades for me:

TRADE #1:

Detroit Demolishers gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 3.04

Year 2007 Draft Pick 8.09

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.04

Team Legacy gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 4.03

Year 2007 Draft Pick 5.10

Year 2007 Draft Pick 11.10

This was Step 1. Acquiring a Top 28 pick. The pick at 39 is OKAY, but I see a big difference in 28 to 39. I'll take an 8 and a 9 and give up my 5 and 11.

TRADE # 2:

The Others gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 2.08

Year 2007 Draft Pick 3.05

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.05

Team Legacy gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 1.10

Year 2007 Draft Pick 6.03

Year 2007 Draft Pick 10.03

Here I give up my 10 pick for the 20, but in return, I add another 3rd rounder and a 9 for my 6 and 10.

So I've basically got 2 2s, 3 3s, NO 4, NO 5 and NO 6, a 7, 2 8s and 3 9s... There's a huge gap after my dominant FAB 5, so I have to do something...

TRADE # 3:

Team Legacy gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 8.03

Year 2007 Draft Pick 8.09

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.04

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.05

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.10

Fly Igglz Fly gave up:

Year 2007 Draft Pick 6.07

Year 2007 Draft Pick 7.06

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.06

Year 2007 Draft Pick 15.06

Year 2007 Draft Pick 16.07

So where there once was a gap, there is now none. I now have a 6, 2 7s, NO 8 and a 9.

2.3

2.8

3.4

3.5

3.10 >> This is a SOLID start. I have 5 picks by 3.10, so I really don't need a 4th or 5th rounder.

6.7

7.6

7.10 >> Solid picks with these will leave me with 8 spots filled.
Click to expand...
Not bad. There's not as much pressure to hoard RBs in HyperActive because you only have to start one back. What this means is that the dropoff between pick 1.05 and pick 2.05 is virtually nonexistent. I love the strategy of loading up on 2nd-3rd round picks in an initial dynasty draft. Depth is huge in dynasty. The ability to get 4-5 solid contributors puts you way ahead of the curve. Just don't blow the opportunity by drafting a bunch of scrub RBs. But I don't have to tell you that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
dirtyhalos said:
hyper/active 2 - staff vs posters league

staff...........bloom, pasquino, grant, wood

posters.......jeter23, wannabee, dirtyhalos, couch potato, team legacy, beaumont, ministry of pain, coolnerd, bri, undercover brotha, lions327, datonn, acer
Click to expand...
Q: How'd they find this guy? A: After scraping the bottom of the barrel and coming up empty, they looked underneath.

BTW, I've traded my 2008 1st and 2nd round rookie picks for Pasquino's. A good predator always likes to begin by picking off the slowest and weakest at the back of the herd... :thumbup:

 
I'm sure it will be a nice league, but HyperActive I will always be king of the HyperActive Leagues :thumbup: I'm looking forward to a repeat title. :thumbup:

 
Couch Potato said:
dirtyhalos said:
hyper/active 2 - staff vs posters league

staff...........bloom, pasquino, grant, wood

posters.......jeter23, wannabee, dirtyhalos, couch potato, team legacy, beaumont, ministry of pain, coolnerd, bri, undercover brotha, lions327, datonn, acer
Click to expand...
Q: How'd they find this guy? A: After scraping the bottom of the barrel and coming up empty, they looked underneath.

BTW, I've traded my 2008 1st and 2nd round rookie picks for Pasquino's. A good predator always likes to begin by picking off the slowest and weakest at the back of the herd... :thumbup:
Click to expand...
Din din :thumbup: Tater aren't you staff? (more subterfuge)

 
Couch Potato said:
Biabreakable said:
Din din :D Tater aren't you staff? (more subterfuge)
Click to expand...
Nah. They run a quality organization here. They're smarter than that.
Click to expand...
Okay just sub-contractor for the nice bells and whistles then.The only downside I see to you swaping picks with Jeff is you wont have as much flexibility in trading those to make other deals happen tater. Becuase you know those picks are going to be well worth keeping. :banned:
 
Biabreakable said:
If you guys would drop the dang PPR I might play with ya. But have fun picking up the Booker/Furrey's of the year.
Click to expand...
For every Furrey there's a Betts or a Drew. I really enjoy the flexibility of HyperActive. It allows more freedom in trades, as opposed to a league like Misfits, where you're stone cold screwed unless you have a stud RB (which are virtually impossible to get).
 
EBF said:
Biabreakable said:
If you guys would drop the dang PPR I might play with ya. But have fun picking up the Booker/Furrey's of the year.
Click to expand...
For every Furrey there's a Betts or a Drew. I really enjoy the flexibility of HyperActive. It allows more freedom in trades, as opposed to a league like Misfits, where you're stone cold screwed unless you have a stud RB (which are virtually impossible to get).
Click to expand...
Not sure if i should be proud or not that this discussion involves 3 guys who were on my Hpyer roster?
 
made this trade, have 2 1st rds now

# Bri gave up Year 2007 Draft Pick 1.11;Year 2007 Draft Pick 5.04;Year 2007 Draft Pick 8.02;Year 2007 Draft Pick 11.11

# Justice League gave up Year 2007 Draft Pick 2.06;Year 2007 Draft Pick 4.06;Year 2007 Draft Pick 7.07;Year 2007 Draft Pick 10.06

2nd trade

# Bri gave up Year 2007 Draft Pick 4.06;Year 2007 Draft Pick 6.07

# Justice League gave up Year 2007 Draft Pick 5.04;Year 2007 Draft Pick 5.07

I'm really to draft.... :lmao:

 
dirtyhalos said:
- start.....qb, rb, wr, wr, te, k, d, 2 flex
Click to expand...
I don't believe that's accurate.I mean the discussion was quite active then the new site was setup but Ryan said this
As far as lineups, I really like the freedom that HA allows. I have LT and kind of missed on some other RBs picks (DD, DWill, etc). Therfore, I started LT and 4 WRs most weeks. It worked pretty well. There were some that started 4 RBs along with 1 WR. It really allows for many different drafting and in season strategies.
Click to expand...
for example amidst other posts.....I don't think that's accurate.I guess we should find out before the draft eh :rant:
 
Bri said:
dirtyhalos said:
- start.....qb, rb, wr, wr, te, k, d, 2 flex
Click to expand...
I don't believe that's accurate.I mean the discussion was quite active then the new site was setup but Ryan said this
As far as lineups, I really like the freedom that HA allows. I have LT and kind of missed on some other RBs picks (DD, DWill, etc). Therfore, I started LT and 4 WRs most weeks. It worked pretty well. There were some that started 4 RBs along with 1 WR. It really allows for many different drafting and in season strategies.
Click to expand...
for example amidst other posts.....I don't think that's accurate.I guess we should find out before the draft eh :confused:
Click to expand...
according to the king nerd, there was some kind of vote we took (i really dont recall) where the 2 wr requirement was voted in, it just hasnt made it to the updated rules page :rant: hth
 
dirtyhalos said:
Bri said:
dirtyhalos said:
- start.....qb, rb, wr, wr, te, k, d, 2 flex
Click to expand...
I don't believe that's accurate.I mean the discussion was quite active then the new site was setup but Ryan said this
As far as lineups, I really like the freedom that HA allows. I have LT and kind of missed on some other RBs picks (DD, DWill, etc). Therfore, I started LT and 4 WRs most weeks. It worked pretty well. There were some that started 4 RBs along with 1 WR. It really allows for many different drafting and in season strategies.
Click to expand...
for example amidst other posts.....I don't think that's accurate.I guess we should find out before the draft eh :bag:
Click to expand...
according to the king nerd, there was some kind of vote we took (i really dont recall) where the 2 wr requirement was voted in, it just hasnt made it to the updated rules page :hifive: hth
Click to expand...
Ahhh so I'm not 100% foolish here I can blame a small percent on Ryan :bag:
 
Bri said:
dirtyhalos said:
Bri said:
dirtyhalos said:
- start.....qb, rb, wr, wr, te, k, d, 2 flex
Click to expand...
I don't believe that's accurate.I mean the discussion was quite active then the new site was setup but Ryan said this
As far as lineups, I really like the freedom that HA allows. I have LT and kind of missed on some other RBs picks (DD, DWill, etc). Therfore, I started LT and 4 WRs most weeks. It worked pretty well. There were some that started 4 RBs along with 1 WR. It really allows for many different drafting and in season strategies.
Click to expand...
for example amidst other posts.....I don't think that's accurate.I guess we should find out before the draft eh :rant:
Click to expand...
according to the king nerd, there was some kind of vote we took (i really dont recall) where the 2 wr requirement was voted in, it just hasnt made it to the updated rules page :lmao: hth
Click to expand...
Ahhh so I'm not 100% foolish here I can blame a small percent on Ryan :wall:
Click to expand...
:wall: Oops, the starters are correct as halos has them listed. They are a little bit different than HA1, per the vote.
 
Detroit Demolishers

I drew the 4th spot in the draft, and began with 4, 21, 28, 45, 52, 69, 76, 93, 100....

I made a few deals:

TRADE #1:

* Detroit Demolishers gave up

Year 2007 Draft Pick 3.04 (28)

Year 2007 Draft Pick 8.09 (93)

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.04 (100)

* Team Legacy gave up

Year 2007 Draft Pick 4.03 (39)

Year 2007 Draft Pick 5.10 (58)

Year 2007 Draft Pick 11.10 (130)

I was not looking to trade back here, and didn't want to trade back 11 spots from 28, as I know the talent drops off quite a bit, but I couldn't pass up getting a 5th for my 8th to make this deal. I feel the move up 35 places offsets the 11 spot drop. I don't mind the drop from round 9 to 11.

This now gave me 4, 21, 39, 45, 52, 58, 69, 76; then a drop to 117.

TRADE 2:

* Detroit Demolishers gave up

Year 2007 Draft Pick 7.04 (76)

Year 2007 Draft Pick 11.04 124)

* dirtyhalos gave up

Year 2007 Draft Pick 7.08 (80)

Year 2007 Draft Pick 10.05 (113)

A relatively minor deal, as I drop 4 spots from my 76 to his 80, and move up 11 spots from 124 to 113. However, I had a 41 spot drop from my pick 76 before this deal, and reduced the drop to 33, only dropping 4 spots to do it. As minor as the deal looks, it was worth the drop to give me better position.

This now gave me 4, 21, 39, 45, 52, 58, 69, 80, 113, 117.

TRADE 3:

* Detroit Demolishers gave up

Year 2007 Draft Pick 10.09 (117)

Year 2007 Draft Pick 16.09 (189)

* Fly Igglz Fly gave up

Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.10 (106)

Year 2007 Draft Pick 20.07 (235)

As above, I wanted to lessen the drop after my pick 80, and didn't care about dropping later in the draft to do so. Another relatively minor trade to position my picks better.

I am now sitting at:

4, (1.04)

21, (2.09)

39, (4.03)

45, (4.09)

52, (5.04)

58, (5.10)

69, (6.09)

80, (7.08)

106, (9.10)

113, (10.05)

Although I dropped early from 28 to 39, getting a 5th for my 8th made it worthwhile. I now have 6 of the top 58, and from 39 to 80, I don't have any big gaps, which protects me from position runs. I also have some flexibility if I decide to try to move up for a specific player.

I feel that I should be able to put together a solid core with the above picks. I definitely like my current picks better than what I started with.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I made a few small moves. Just wanted to get me in the range of a few players i like.

1. Undercover Brotha / wannabee Trade Undercover Brotha gave up Year 2007 Draft Pick 3.09;Year 2007 Draft Pick 7.09

wannabee gave up Year 2007 Draft Pick 4.11;Year 2007 Draft Pick 5.02

Once i had added the 3.02, i went on and decided to move my 3.09 and 7.09 for a 4.11 and 5.02 picks. 3.07 wasnt gonna get my target player, thus my move down.



2. wannabee / Undercover Brotha Trade wannabee gave up Year 2007 Draft Pick 3.02;Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.02

Undercover Brotha gave up Year 2007 Draft Pick 5.09;Year 2007 Draft Pick 11.09; Year 2008 Round 1 Draft Pick from Undercover Brotha

This is the deal that i added the 3.02, i lost my 1st however but all in all i like this move as i can land a top notch wr with this pick.



3. Bri / Undercover Brotha Trade Bri gave up Year 2007 Draft Pick 7.07;Year 2007 Draft Pick 14.02; Year 2008 Round 3 Draft Pick from Bri

Undercover Brotha gave up Year 2007 Draft Pick 9.09;Year 2007 Draft Pick 10.04

Bri wanted about alot of picks in a row in the 9th and 10th rounds and i sure like the 7th round pick he sent me.

Im ready to draft though, wanted to move down from 1.09 but depending on who may fall i will be ok with that.

 
THE UNDERCOVER BROTHA said:
Bri wanted about alot of picks in a row in the 9th and 10th rounds and i sure like the 7th round pick he sent me.
Click to expand...
I'm trying something, generally it was trading up some + trading down some and fairly even. Value wise I don't see a prob but what's got me so interested is how this fills out my team.I think I have alot of options and can easily mess up some draft plans if I'm feeling silly and draft a slew of one position and knock things down a tier or two. I don't really want to, would like to do this draft right and not play around.

I'm very confident my backups will be better than most.(Not so far fetched as I'm drafting 10th round and you guys go 11th, 12th, 13th) However, I really need a couple players to fall to me so my starters are as strong.(difference between my 9th, and others 6,7,8th) It's extremely common for someone to fall into those rounds I really thought this through and it happenned in every draft I looked at. SO I think this is set up well for me in theory.

Im ready to draft though, wanted to move down from 1.09 but depending on who may fall i will be ok with that.
Click to expand...
Anything from 1.6th thru 1.12th seems like once the draft gets started you're stuck. Glad I was able to trade out of the first a month or so ago.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
not sure if I like Jackson and Johnson better or MJD and Maroney as it's longterm BUT throw in Peterson.....geesh

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Couch Potato
Couch Potato 2012 Dynasty Rankings
4 5 6
Replies
293
Views
34K
Spin
Spin
David Dodds
Official Ultimate Survivor 2 Thread
6 7 8
Replies
366
Views
17K
Bankerguy
Bankerguy
N
$100 All-play Slow Draft - Need 2!
Replies
2
Views
155
SheikL
S

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top