I can. SD has an entire new coaching staff and the Colts lost Harper, David, June, Morris, and Rhodes. While the defense played better in the post-season, I never thought the Colts D was all that great before they lost some key guys . . .Even with all of the moves the Patriots have made so far, I can't rank them ahead of Indy or San Diego yet.
Even with all of the moves the Patriots have made so far, I can't rank them ahead of Indy or San Diego yet.
Yes but you hate the Patriots with the passion of 1,000 suns. I rankEven with all of the moves the Patriots have made so far, I can't rank them ahead of Indy or San Diego yet.
Okay, I know I'm a homer or anything, but I think this is pretty absurd. They had a lot of new guys last year too, but the difference is most of them were exponentially less talented than the new guys this year.Barring an injury to Tom Brady, I can't see how the Patriots miss the playoffs.The Patriots look like the team everyone will love to talk about, but there are way too many new guys.It's going to take some time for them to gel. I wouldn't be surprised to see them end up missing the playoffs.
Yes but you hate the Patriots with the passion of 1,000 suns.Even with all of the moves the Patriots have made so far, I can't rank them ahead of Indy or San Diego yet.
Let's start here . . .They went 12-4 last year. Given the guys they've added, what do you think there record will be in 07?at NY Jets 1:00 pm San Diego 8:15 pm Buffalo 1:00 pm at Cincinnati 8:30 pm Cleveland 1:00 pm at Dallas 4:15 pm at Miami 1:00 pm Washington 4:15 pm at Indianapolis 4:15 pm bye at Buffalo 1:00 pm Philadelphia 8:15 pm at Baltimore 8:30 pm Pittsburgh 1:00 pm NY Jets 1:00 pm Miami 1:00 pm at NY Giants 8:15 pmYes but you hate the Patriots with the passion of 1,000 suns.Even with all of the moves the Patriots have made so far, I can't rank them ahead of Indy or San Diego yet.True, but I can't put them any lower than 3rd right now. Slightly above the Raiders.
So the Patriots, who finished the season 12-4 and were a couple of bad plays away from the Super Bowl, who far and away improved their team the most in the off-season, not only will miss the playoffs, but finish third in their division? Just clarifying.The Patriots look like the team everyone will love to talk about, but there are way too many new guys.It's going to take some time for them to gel. I wouldn't be surprised to see them end up missing the playoffs.San Diego - Rivers will be more comfortable and Tomlinson won't have to do so much.Indy - Still ??'s about their DCincinnatti - Palmer's starting the season healthy, but ??'s at LBNew England - should be very good but see aboveNew York Jets - will be right there with New England for the DivDenver - Henry will allow Cutler to do his thingJacksonville - don't count them outBaltimore, Pittsburgh - Balt regresses, Pittsburgh improvesWild Card - Buffalo - I think they'll be good. Maybe a ceiling of 9-7, but it may be enough to be in the WC hunt still at the start of week 17
I definitely think New England and San Diego are in a tier above the rest.I think San Diego was a better team than New England last year but obviously choked. Now that New England has improved, they may be better. However, as we saw last season (IMO), the better team doesn't always win this matchup... San Diego could still easily finish as a better team and/or beat the Pats in the playoffs.I think San Diego was a better team than Indy last year but didn't get the opportunity to play them in the playoffs and prove it. In my opinion, Indy has regressed this offseason. So I still think San Diego is better.I think San Diego was a better team than Denver last year. I think Denver has improved, but I still think San Diego is better.I definitely think San Diego remains better than Cincy, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Jacksonville, and the Jets.Not sure why so many seem to think San Diego, which was clearly the best team in the NFL entering last season's playoffs (IMO), is potentially not a top 3 team in their own conference entering this season.
Looks like 10-6 to me.Let's start here . . .They went 12-4 last year. Given the guys they've added, what do you think there record will be in 07?at NY Jets 1:00 pm LossSan Diego 8:15 pm LossBuffalo 1:00 pm Winat Cincinnati 8:30 pm LossCleveland 1:00 pm Winat Dallas 4:15 pm Lossat Miami 1:00 pm WinWashington 4:15 pm Winat Indianapolis 4:15 pm Lossbye at Buffalo 1:00 pm WinPhiladelphia 8:15 pm Winat Baltimore 8:30 pm LossPittsburgh 1:00 pm WinNY Jets 1:00 pm WinMiami 1:00 pm Winat NY Giants 8:15 pm WinYes but you hate the Patriots with the passion of 1,000 suns.Even with all of the moves the Patriots have made so far, I can't rank them ahead of Indy or San Diego yet.True, but I can't put them any lower than 3rd right now. Slightly above the Raiders.
Well, anything can happen but I don't think so.At the most 2 teams from the East will make the playoffs. I was just suggesting that if Losman can pick up where he left off last year it would be possible for them to sneak in at 9-7. 9-7 is their ceiling though. They'd have to have a lot of things go their way which is unlikely.Also, I don't think NE will not win their division. The expectations are there and with so many new players plus the ?'s they bring it's not a given that they for sure will be all that they are expected to be. These things happen every year. It wouldn't surprise me is all. I'd be disappointed for sure as Brady is my QB in my dynasty league.So the Patriots, who finished the season 12-4 and were a couple of bad plays away from the Super Bowl, who far and away improved their team the most in the off-season, not only will miss the playoffs, but finish third in their division? Just clarifying.The Patriots look like the team everyone will love to talk about, but there are way too many new guys.It's going to take some time for them to gel. I wouldn't be surprised to see them end up missing the playoffs.San Diego - Rivers will be more comfortable and Tomlinson won't have to do so much.Indy - Still ??'s about their DCincinnatti - Palmer's starting the season healthy, but ??'s at LBNew England - should be very good but see aboveNew York Jets - will be right there with New England for the DivDenver - Henry will allow Cutler to do his thingJacksonville - don't count them outBaltimore, Pittsburgh - Balt regresses, Pittsburgh improvesWild Card - Buffalo - I think they'll be good. Maybe a ceiling of 9-7, but it may be enough to be in the WC hunt still at the start of week 17
@ Dallas loss? Is it because of the emotional letdown from their win over Cleveland, or because they'll be petrified of playing @Ted Ginn the following week?Looks like 10-6 to me.Let's start here . . .They went 12-4 last year. Given the guys they've added, what do you think there record will be in 07?at NY Jets 1:00 pm LossSan Diego 8:15 pm LossBuffalo 1:00 pm Winat Cincinnati 8:30 pm LossCleveland 1:00 pm Winat Dallas 4:15 pm Lossat Miami 1:00 pm WinWashington 4:15 pm Winat Indianapolis 4:15 pm Lossbye at Buffalo 1:00 pm WinPhiladelphia 8:15 pm Winat Baltimore 8:30 pm LossPittsburgh 1:00 pm WinNY Jets 1:00 pm WinMiami 1:00 pm Winat NY Giants 8:15 pm WinYes but you hate the Patriots with the passion of 1,000 suns.Even with all of the moves the Patriots have made so far, I can't rank them ahead of Indy or San Diego yet.True, but I can't put them any lower than 3rd right now. Slightly above the Raiders.
I'm sure I missed on a couple of those 10 wins as well.at NY Jets 1:00 pm LossSan Diego 8:15 pm Lossat Cincinnati 8:30 pm Lossat Dallas 4:15 pm Lossat Indianapolis 4:15 pm Lossat Baltimore 8:30 pm LossNew England isn't going to lose ALL of these games.
(inspired by the Michael Turner thread)
How do you rank the top teams in the AFC?
I've got:New England Indy, a very young team reaching their peak
Indianapolis SD , another team young, with a great RB
San Deigo Denver, great o-line, if QB comes around they could be great
Cincinnati NE, the oldest team of this group, adding Moss IMO will hurt more
then it helps, just wait until Moss has has a game when Brady only
Denver throws him two passes, Randy will have some print for the press.
Cinn: They be seen on true adventures of law enforcement T.V.
Didn't they finish third in thier division last year?Indy has improved offensively. Yes their defense is scary, but they don't really face any offenses that can keep up.San Diego hasn't lost anything, I don't see the coaching staff being a negative.Why do we assume the additions to NE will gel - you're talking about two fragile (emotionally) WRs, and they lost Dillon.So the Patriots, who finished the season 12-4 and were a couple of bad plays away from the Super Bowl, who far and away improved their team the most in the off-season, not only will miss the playoffs, but finish third in their division? Just clarifying.The Patriots look like the team everyone will love to talk about, but there are way too many new guys.It's going to take some time for them to gel. I wouldn't be surprised to see them end up missing the playoffs.San Diego - Rivers will be more comfortable and Tomlinson won't have to do so much.Indy - Still ??'s about their DCincinnatti - Palmer's starting the season healthy, but ??'s at LBNew England - should be very good but see aboveNew York Jets - will be right there with New England for the DivDenver - Henry will allow Cutler to do his thingJacksonville - don't count them outBaltimore, Pittsburgh - Balt regresses, Pittsburgh improvesWild Card - Buffalo - I think they'll be good. Maybe a ceiling of 9-7, but it may be enough to be in the WC hunt still at the start of week 17
I can. SD has an entire new coaching staff and the Colts lost Harper, David, June, Morris, and Rhodes. While the defense played better in the post-season, I never thought the Colts D was all that great before they lost some key guys . . .Even with all of the moves the Patriots have made so far, I can't rank them ahead of Indy or San Diego yet.
Why not? I can see them possibly beating SD and Baltimore, but just as much as I can see SD and Baltimore beating them. NYJ will split with them. Dallas I think will beat them. Cinci too. I would add in a loss to Buffalo as well, probably in Buffalo. So that's 8 games they could realistically lose. Even if they don't lose them all, do you see better than 12-4????at NY Jets 1:00 pm LossSan Diego 8:15 pm Lossat Cincinnati 8:30 pm Lossat Dallas 4:15 pm Lossat Indianapolis 4:15 pm Lossat Baltimore 8:30 pm LossNew England isn't going to lose ALL of these games.
Buffalo contended for a playoff spot last year.I will be surprised when/if one of Oakland, Kansas City, Cleveland, Buffalo, or Miami contends for a playoff spot, but it seems like there's always a surprise team.
Morris is still a Colt.ShadowMaster said:I'm in agreement with Yudkin....... watch out for the flying pigs!
David Yudkin said:I can. SD has an entire new coaching staff and the Colts lost Harper, David, June, Morris, and Rhodes. While the defense played better in the post-season, I never thought the Colts D was all that great before they lost some key guys . . .radballs said:Even with all of the moves the Patriots have made so far, I can't rank them ahead of Indy or San Diego yet.
This point is entirely overrated. Norv Turner was brought in primarily because he is familiar with the offense, the personnel, and the philosophy. Ted Cotrell was hired because he will run the same defense. Clarence Shelmon was promoted from within the team. Even though there are new names at all three spots, there is also a lot of consistency.And don't forget, the Chargers were only two plays on the road against two playoff teams from going undefeated. Even with all the good players the Patriots added, there are still more 2006 Pro-Bowlers on the Chargers' squad.David Yudkin said:SD has an entire new coaching staff
The 06 Chargers had 8 Pro Bowlers. The 2003 Pats had 3. So? I'm not arguing that the Chargers aren't a good team. But I do think that completely swapping out the coaching staff is not a minor thing (especially since people are lowering expecations for the Pats with a half dozen new faces in the fold as players in New England).Turner has not exactly had a great coaching track record to date. This team is much better than the others he's coached, but he's won one post-season games in 9 years as a head coach. (Sadly, that's one more than Schottenheimer had in the past 11 years.)Even with all the good players the Patriots added, there are still more 2006 Pro-Bowlers on the Chargers' squad.David Yudkin said:SD has an entire new coaching staff
I forgot he resigned. Didin't they lose someone else, another DB this offseason? Did Doss move on (that that he was a difference maker)?Morris is still a Colt.ShadowMaster said:I'm in agreement with Yudkin....... watch out for the flying pigs!
David Yudkin said:I can. SD has an entire new coaching staff and the Colts lost Harper, David, June, Morris, and Rhodes. While the defense played better in the post-season, I never thought the Colts D was all that great before they lost some key guys . . .radballs said:Even with all of the moves the Patriots have made so far, I can't rank them ahead of Indy or San Diego yet.
I must have missed that (or blocked it out of my mind as being completely moronic). Post #?I love it. Everyone says the Patriots have no chance last season harping on their horrible WR group - they then go out and probably upgrade their WR unit more than any other position on any other team in the NFL, and now the Patriots are being downgraded because of "?"'s at the WR position.
The secondary is improved from last year's.Graham was an excellent run blocker and an inconsistent receiver - he will be missed, but Kyle Brady is a more than adequate run blocker himself. Graham and Dillon's loss pales in comparison to the additions the Patriots have made, including arguable the best defensive player on the market as well as three WR's who are all upgrades over the best WR on this team last season. I don't think the Patriots are going 16-0 this season, but the people here talking like the Patriots did not improve this season are either crazy or Radballs.Pats have a good team, but they aren't devoid of question marks themselves. Their secondary is suspect and I think they will miss Graham.
Below are some quotes that are either directly or indirectly downgrading the Patriot's overall strength because of the WR's they've added and the baggage that comes with them.I must have missed that (or blocked it out of my mind as being completely moronic). Post #?I love it. Everyone says the Patriots have no chance last season harping on their horrible WR group - they then go out and probably upgrade their WR unit more than any other position on any other team in the NFL, and now the Patriots are being downgraded because of "?"'s at the WR position.
switz said:Why do we assume the additions to NE will gel - you're talking about two fragile (emotionally) WRs, and they lost Dillon.
BLOX said:The expectations are there and with so many new players plus the ?'s they bring it's not a given that they for sure will be all that they are expected to be.
Look - I'm not saying that there's not a chance Moss doesn't flip out or Stallworth doesn't pully a hammy. But to think that, even with the risk of these things happening, that the Patriots have no drastically upgraded their WR situation with Moss/Stallworth/Welker is foolish.hacman said:Patriots - possible they put it together again, but this has been an unpatriotic offseason for them. Feels like a rush job for Belichek.
There is no doubt that they have improved, but they still have questions. I don't think their secondary has really improved (I'm not convinced Meriweather will start for one thing), plus Maroney had injury troubles and the depth behind him is not what it was (S Morris and K Faulk).But to be fair, IMO they have less questions then any other team, but questions nonetheless. Besides, SB's aren't won in April/May.The secondary is improved from last year's.Graham was an excellent run blocker and an inconsistent receiver - he will be missed, but Kyle Brady is a more than adequate run blocker himself. Graham and Dillon's loss pales in comparison to the additions the Patriots have made, including arguable the best defensive player on the market as well as three WR's who are all upgrades over the best WR on this team last season. I don't think the Patriots are going 16-0 this season, but the people here talking like the Patriots did not improve this season are either crazy or Radballs.Pats have a good team, but they aren't devoid of question marks themselves. Their secondary is suspect and I think they will miss Graham.
Not to single you out, but how is it that the Pats defense that:- Only allowed a team record low 237 points- Added Adelius Thomas and Brandon Meriweather- Should have Rodney Harrison, Randall Gay, Chad Scott, and Eugene Wilson back from injuriesThat worse off than last year while one of the other contenders (IND) . . .- Allowed 360 points- Lost their a Pro Bowl CB, a Pro Bowl LB, and their other starting CB- Whose have signed essentially no defensive free agents- Who added several rookies drafted in Rounds 3-5- Down the road would have to face a Pats offense with A LOT more firepowerI do agree that the Pats like all teams have a few question marks, but I can't see how people don't see them as in a much better place than they were starting out last season.Pats have a good team, but they aren't devoid of question marks themselves. Their secondary is suspect and I think they will miss Graham.
Neither Harper nor David has ever made a Pro Bowl.Not to single you out, but how is it that the Pats defense that:- Only allowed a team record low 237 pointsPats have a good team, but they aren't devoid of question marks themselves. Their secondary is suspect and I think they will miss Graham.
- Added Adelius Thomas and Brandon Meriweather
- Should have Rodney Harrison, Randall Gay, Chad Scott, and Eugene Wilson back from injuries
That worse off than last year while one of the other contenders (IND) . . .
- Allowed 360 points
- Lost their a Pro Bowl CB, a Pro Bowl LB, and their other starting CB
- Whose have signed essentially no defensive free agents
- Who added several rookies drafted in Rounds 3-5
- Down the road would have to face a Pats offense with A LOT more firepower
I do agree that the Pats like all teams have a few question marks, but I can't see how people don't see them as in a much better place than they were starting out last season.
I'm not saying they didn't upgrade. Heck, before the Moss trade I had a thread about how much they upgraded with Welker and Stallwortth that got locked.My point is - we can't assume that the upgrade automatically put them over other teams that were ahead of them last year and have also upgraded in Indy and SD.Look - I'm not saying that there's not a chance Moss doesn't flip out or Stallworth doesn't pully a hammy. But to think that, even with the risk of these things happening, that the Patriots have no drastically upgraded their WR situation with Moss/Stallworth/Welker is foolish.
Oh God yes, NE has been absolutely trashed in this thread. Everyone is putting them down. Someone even suggested that they might not win the Super Bowl *gasp*. No respect, no respect at all.Chargers, Indy, and NE are the top teams. Baltimore has taken a step back in my eyes or I would have them in there as well. As a playoff dark horse I would pick Pitt or MiamiYou know the Patriots are back on top (in people's minds) when all guys can do is put them down. Most talked about team at FBG by far. That being said...
Patriots: 12-4
Colts: 12-4
Chargers: 11-5
Bengals: 10-6
Jets: - 10-6 WC
Broncos: - 10-6 WC
Ravens
Jaguars
Titans
Steelers
Bills
Chiefs
Browns
Dolphins
Texans
Raiders
In my eyes it's a repeat of last year's AFC Championship. Except this time, it's back at our house.
Flame away!
That's the thing with NE fans... doesn't matter what's said - everyone disrespects NE.And criticize their WRs over the years, they defend them. Then criticize Brady - the excuse is his WRs were bad. It's just the average NE fan. Ignore it.Oh God yes, NE has been absolutely trashed in this thread. Everyone is putting them down. Someone even suggested that they might not win the Super Bowl *gasp*. No respect, no respect at all.You know the Patriots are back on top (in people's minds) when all guys can do is put them down. Most talked about team at FBG by far. That being said...
Who exactly do they need to beat in their division that is ahead of them?The Pats will be good this year, best in the division? Not until they beat the teams ahead of them.