Footballguys is hiring
#1
Posted 14 August 2007 - 05:33 AM
For an example of what we are looking for, here is a great example: Sample Recap
If you are interested, please watch any preseason game, write up a recap and send it to me at fazio@footballguys.com, preferably as a word document. Also being sure to note if you have NFL Sunday ticket and if not, what market you are in or teams you could cover on a regular basis.
Game recaps pay $25.00 per recap, and a subscription to the site is included as well. I usually have more recappers than games on a weekly basis, but I try to even things out throughout the season. And I do work with you as to your schedule and team coverage preferences.
If you have any questions, please feel free to pm me or send me an email.
#3
Posted 16 August 2007 - 07:46 PM
From my experience on the recap squad (heading into year three), I can tell you that the sample is an outstanding example of one person's work, with edit and review by FBG staff, of course.that's quite thorough, that example.
Is that a summary of several reporters or by just one individual?
#4
Posted 16 August 2007 - 09:53 PM
Really? WOW yeah that's some pretty great work.From my experience on the recap squad (heading into year three), I can tell you that the sample is an outstanding example of one person's work, with edit and review by FBG staff, of course.that's quite thorough, that example.
Is that a summary of several reporters or by just one individual?And no, I didn't write that one. That's something to aspire to, though.
I did this for stats inc years ago and sorta keep an eye on those things every now and then. That's exceptional.
One Q though, with stats we enterred in every play 32 rush 10yards first down, tackle by 56.
You guys do that? or just the overall recap?
Are the game stats(play by play) and targets from NFL or done by recapper?
I have a hard time believing that one guy could enter in every play AND recap that well. The cruddy part of stats job was you actually didn't see the game so much as became a numbers hound. Kinda hard to word.
I could see him taking notes(without the stats) then writing something later.
Eh well that's well done, kudos to him.
Twitter Formerly of USAToday, owner of FootballHangout. Creator of Mock Draft Simulator app on Google Play Store.
#5
Posted 17 August 2007 - 04:27 AM
The internet has lots of great places to get the stats, and I personally use NFL.com as a statistical supplement to watching the game. The targets are tracked by the individual Recapper, but can also be verified against other sources. NFL.com's play-by-play has gotten both consistently more accurate and more detailed, which I've also found to be a great resource. I can't speak for the other Recappers, but I've put some time into creating some tables and spreadsheets that I can print out to use for tracking various aspects of the game while I'm watching (targets, drives, scoring, etc.).Really? WOW yeah that's some pretty great work.From my experience on the recap squad (heading into year three), I can tell you that the sample is an outstanding example of one person's work, with edit and review by FBG staff, of course.that's quite thorough, that example.
Is that a summary of several reporters or by just one individual?And no, I didn't write that one. That's something to aspire to, though.
I did this for stats inc years ago and sorta keep an eye on those things every now and then. That's exceptional.
One Q though, with stats we enterred in every play 32 rush 10yards first down, tackle by 56.
You guys do that? or just the overall recap?
Are the game stats(play by play) and targets from NFL or done by recapper?
I have a hard time believing that one guy could enter in every play AND recap that well. The cruddy part of stats job was you actually didn't see the game so much as became a numbers hound. Kinda hard to word.
I could see him taking notes(without the stats) then writing something later.
Eh well that's well done, kudos to him.
#6
Posted 17 August 2007 - 04:33 AM
Game recaps are done by one individual per game. And the recappers are outstanding, amaze me every week.Really? WOW yeah that's some pretty great work.From my experience on the recap squad (heading into year three), I can tell you that the sample is an outstanding example of one person's work, with edit and review by FBG staff, of course.that's quite thorough, that example.
Is that a summary of several reporters or by just one individual?And no, I didn't write that one. That's something to aspire to, though.
I did this for stats inc years ago and sorta keep an eye on those things every now and then. That's exceptional.
One Q though, with stats we enterred in every play 32 rush 10yards first down, tackle by 56.
You guys do that? or just the overall recap?
Are the game stats(play by play) and targets from NFL or done by recapper?
I have a hard time believing that one guy could enter in every play AND recap that well. The cruddy part of stats job was you actually didn't see the game so much as became a numbers hound. Kinda hard to word.
I could see him taking notes(without the stats) then writing something later.
Eh well that's well done, kudos to him.
The stat line is pulled in automatically when the recaps are generated to the site. Thanks to Doug Drinen.
Targets are counted by the recapper, and confirmed at NFL.com. Once in a great while NFL.com does make a mistake.
#7
Posted 17 August 2007 - 08:08 AM
#8
Posted 17 August 2007 - 10:14 AM
Most likely counted himself, then doublechecked on nfl.com.Where did that guy find out the number of targets to Marques Colston?
#10
Posted 18 August 2007 - 12:08 PM
#11
Posted 18 August 2007 - 02:08 PM
Nice toe.nice avatar
#12
Posted 19 August 2007 - 05:30 PM
#13
Posted 20 August 2007 - 02:37 AM
The recaps are due by 5 am EST Monday following the game. Sunday and Monday night games are due by 12 noon EST. They are posted to the site, usually by late Monday afternoon.When are these due every week? Is this one day turnaround from comletion of a game? A regular feature on the same day every week? Just curious. Thanks.
#14
Posted 22 August 2007 - 09:24 PM
It's baseball here Doug, it's just baseball.
#15
Posted 23 August 2007 - 04:14 AM
You're right, Pat, it's not really about the money. But it is a nice touch.If that recap is indicative of an average recap, that is a lot of work for $25.00. I would guess 5 hours work or so between watching the game, reviewing it via TIVO and writing the actual recap. Not that your basic model would suggest paying more than $25 per game, but $5 an hour is not exactly time well spent. I guess you could skip the game and just TIVO it. Take notes while watching it later. You might be able to complete a good recap in 3 hours time.
#16
Posted 23 August 2007 - 07:41 PM
If its not about the money then what do you get out of it? The satisfaction of a job well done? Promise of more lucrative employment down the line? Less time with your kids? Whats the end game?You're right, Pat, it's not really about the money. But it is a nice touch.If that recap is indicative of an average recap, that is a lot of work for $25.00. I would guess 5 hours work or so between watching the game, reviewing it via TIVO and writing the actual recap. Not that your basic model would suggest paying more than $25 per game, but $5 an hour is not exactly time well spent. I guess you could skip the game and just TIVO it. Take notes while watching it later. You might be able to complete a good recap in 3 hours time.
It's baseball here Doug, it's just baseball.
#17
Posted 24 August 2007 - 02:55 AM
Some people like to write and have their stuff published. If it's not worth it to you, why don't you just move on?If its not about the money then what do you get out of it? The satisfaction of a job well done? Promise of more lucrative employment down the line? Less time with your kids? Whats the end game?You're right, Pat, it's not really about the money. But it is a nice touch.If that recap is indicative of an average recap, that is a lot of work for $25.00. I would guess 5 hours work or so between watching the game, reviewing it via TIVO and writing the actual recap. Not that your basic model would suggest paying more than $25 per game, but $5 an hour is not exactly time well spent. I guess you could skip the game and just TIVO it. Take notes while watching it later. You might be able to complete a good recap in 3 hours time.
I get carried away in arguments trying to make my case/defend my stance. That is different than what I was referring to. Some people like to pop into threads and authoritatively state opinions on situations without actually knowing very much (they don't know historical patterns, coaching tendencies, o-line changes, college performance, etc). They throw out buzz words like burst and vision but don't have a clue. They claim AJ has lost a step when he's really just not getting as many targets. They call Quizz a poor man's Sproles just because he's short. Stuff like that.
#18
Posted 24 August 2007 - 09:26 AM
Money is certainly part of it, though not the entire reason for it. Yes. Possibly. I don't have any kids. Turning in a recap, having it edited and published, and having thousands (hopefully) read it.If its not about the money then what do you get out of it? The satisfaction of a job well done? Promise of more lucrative employment down the line? Less time with your kids? Whats the end game?You're right, Pat, it's not really about the money. But it is a nice touch.If that recap is indicative of an average recap, that is a lot of work for $25.00. I would guess 5 hours work or so between watching the game, reviewing it via TIVO and writing the actual recap. Not that your basic model would suggest paying more than $25 per game, but $5 an hour is not exactly time well spent. I guess you could skip the game and just TIVO it. Take notes while watching it later. You might be able to complete a good recap in 3 hours time.
#19
Posted 24 August 2007 - 05:45 PM
Dude, it was a legitimate question and I was curious. Whats wrong with that? I'm not here attacking anybody for doing these recaps.Some people like to write and have their stuff published. If it's not worth it to you, why don't you just move on?If its not about the money then what do you get out of it? The satisfaction of a job well done? Promise of more lucrative employment down the line? Less time with your kids? Whats the end game?You're right, Pat, it's not really about the money. But it is a nice touch.If that recap is indicative of an average recap, that is a lot of work for $25.00. I would guess 5 hours work or so between watching the game, reviewing it via TIVO and writing the actual recap. Not that your basic model would suggest paying more than $25 per game, but $5 an hour is not exactly time well spent. I guess you could skip the game and just TIVO it. Take notes while watching it later. You might be able to complete a good recap in 3 hours time.
It's baseball here Doug, it's just baseball.
#20
Posted 25 August 2007 - 07:43 AM
Thank you.You have a nice toe.Nice toe.nice avatar
![]()
#21
Posted 26 August 2007 - 09:58 PM
#22
Posted 27 August 2007 - 09:29 AM
You should definitely give it a shot, but don't underestimate the number of FBGs with Sunday Ticket™. :jealous:From ny, but i live in NC... I wouldnt be surprised if yall dont have anybody to recap Panthers games. I would like to give it a shot
#23
Posted 03 September 2007 - 09:39 AM
#24
Posted 03 August 2008 - 12:41 PM
-Margaret Weis, Dragons of Winter Night
#25
Posted 03 August 2008 - 12:56 PM
Wait.....they will PAY ME to watch the game I was going to watch anyway, and write about it (when I would almost certainly be here talking/writing about it anyway)? And then I can LEGITIMATELY tell my old lady I'm "working" while on FBG or watchingfootball? AND THIS IS BAD HOW?????????? BY THE WAY....SIGN ME UP!!!!If that recap is indicative of an average recap, that is a lot of work for $25.00. I would guess 5 hours work or so between watching the game, reviewing it via TIVO and writing the actual recap. Not that your basic model would suggest paying more than $25 per game, but $5 an hour is not exactly time well spent. I guess you could skip the game and just TIVO it. Take notes while watching it later. You might be able to complete a good recap in 3 hours time.
#26
Posted 03 August 2008 - 01:02 PM
www.mastersball.com
#27
Posted 03 August 2008 - 01:19 PM
Thanks for the kudos. I spent a lot of time on my recaps. Bizarre I never saw this thread a year ago.Really? WOW yeah that's some pretty great work.From my experience on the recap squad (heading into year three), I can tell you that the sample is an outstanding example of one person's work, with edit and review by FBG staff, of course.that's quite thorough, that example.
Is that a summary of several reporters or by just one individual?And no, I didn't write that one. That's something to aspire to, though.
I did this for stats inc years ago and sorta keep an eye on those things every now and then. That's exceptional.
One Q though, with stats we enterred in every play 32 rush 10yards first down, tackle by 56.
You guys do that? or just the overall recap?
Are the game stats(play by play) and targets from NFL or done by recapper?
I have a hard time believing that one guy could enter in every play AND recap that well. The cruddy part of stats job was you actually didn't see the game so much as became a numbers hound. Kinda hard to word.
I could see him taking notes(without the stats) then writing something later.
Eh well that's well done, kudos to him.
I charted every play of the game using grid of players by positions. Different symbols for targets, penalties, sacks, incompletions, drops, TDs, etc. I have a digital copy of a sample if someone wants one. Tried to get a large chunk of it done during halftime and usually was able to finish an hour or two after the completion of a game, but I was writing continuously during games as well. Writing these is definitely the one thing I miss about working for FBG.
#28
Posted 03 August 2008 - 02:04 PM
#29
Posted 03 August 2008 - 05:35 PM
but there are people in life, people you know in your own personal life Joe that just always seem to have a cloud over them. I try to distance myself form those folks as much as possible and I bet you do to.
Clearly, I am the not-bright one.
#30
Posted 04 August 2008 - 02:15 AM
another reason for him to smoke the cheeba and guzzle tequilaYou guys are really setting up MOP for his dream to be crushed...............again.
I am a walking, talking nightmare of a dooooosh.
ShaqAttack is correct in all of his assessments
#31
Posted 04 August 2008 - 04:30 AM
#32
Posted 04 August 2008 - 07:46 AM
another reason for him to smoke the cheeba and guzzle tequilaYou guys are really setting up MOP for his dream to be crushed...............again.
but there are people in life, people you know in your own personal life Joe that just always seem to have a cloud over them. I try to distance myself form those folks as much as possible and I bet you do to.
Clearly, I am the not-bright one.
#33
Posted 04 August 2008 - 10:17 AM
#34
Posted 04 August 2008 - 03:08 PM
#35
Posted 04 August 2008 - 03:34 PM
#36
Posted 04 August 2008 - 03:49 PM
I watch the Lions too. Therefore, I know from first-hand experience that it constitutes you as mental.I'll do the Detroit Lions...I watch all their games... Does this constitute an application?
Click here to listen to the Audible, and get another edge on your competition.
Want to be the best in IDP leagues? Start by checking out The Audible IDP podcasts: IDP 101, IDP 201, IDP 301, IDP 401a, IDP 401b
#37
Posted 04 August 2008 - 03:54 PM
Sweet, I'll have to send in a sample here soon. Is there anyway to move up to a 3 digit membership number as compensation. Ever since I had car issues the day this site converted over I've been stuck with a 4 digit number since I logged in at the end of the day.I edited the opening post to reflect, that yes we will be hiring game recappers for the Fall.
#38
Posted 04 August 2008 - 06:34 PM
Given your avatar, you should have called him a meat head.I watch the Lions too. Therefore, I know from first-hand experience that it constitutes you as mental.I'll do the Detroit Lions...I watch all their games... Does this constitute an application?
![]()
Change is inevitable except from a vending machine. When the chips are down, the buffalo is empty. Those who live by the sword... get shot by those who don't.
#39
Posted 04 August 2008 - 07:27 PM
that should be easy... Today the Lions punted the ball a lot. They played pretty bad. They surprisingly were in the game late in the fourth quarter but a last minute interception that was returned for a touchdown sealed the defeat for the motor city kitties.I'll do the Detroit Lions...I watch all their games... Does this constitute an application?
#40
Posted 04 August 2008 - 07:37 PM
#41
Posted 05 August 2008 - 05:37 AM
wow you're good... "they played well on special teams, Their Punter really has a well developed Kicking Leg...except for one blown play which allowed DHester to tie the NFL record of an 109 punt return...They had a shot..."that should be easy... Today the Lions punted the ball a lot. They played pretty bad. They surprisingly were in the game late in the fourth quarter but a last minute interception that was returned for a touchdown sealed the defeat for the motor city kitties.I'll do the Detroit Lions...I watch all their games... Does this constitute an application?
#42
Posted 05 August 2008 - 09:25 AM
#43
Posted 05 August 2008 - 09:37 AM
#44
Posted 05 August 2008 - 02:58 PM
Um, sorry, no it does not. I'm sure you knew that though.I'll do the Detroit Lions...I watch all their games... Does this constitute an application?
#45
Posted 06 August 2008 - 10:01 AM
You guys are really setting up MOP for his dream to be crushed...............again.
shuke loves werewolf but hates irony
All election bets collected. Tigerbets pending.
If anyone wants to go Heads Up with Big Hands, club info here:
Club ID: 766506
Invitation code: BigHandsOtis
#46
Posted 07 August 2008 - 07:00 AM
Passing TD's - 4 pts.
Touchdown play over 40 yds. - 3 pts.
300 yds. passing - 3 pts.
100 yds. rushing or receiving - 3 pts.
Every additional 50 yds. - 1 pt.
No points lost for interceptions.
No points awarded for receptions.
#47
Posted 07 August 2008 - 08:55 AM
Baseball - Baseball is BACK! "The_Franchise"
Twitter: teh_franchise
#48
Posted 09 August 2008 - 11:04 AM
QB - Tom Brady, Ben Roethlisberger, Michael Vick
RB - DeAngelo, L McCoy, A. Foster, K, Moreno, L Marooney, Fred Taylor
WR - R. Moss, Ocho, D Bryant, BMW, Naanee, B Tate
TE - O Daniels, Gronkowski
DEF - Pittsburgh, Chicago
Kick - Kaeding
I have been doing this for a long time and I would rather just use one or two sheets of paper and WATCH my opponents - you would be surprised what you can gain reading people at the draft table (not unlike the poker table)
- Words of Wisdom
#49
Posted 11 August 2008 - 12:35 PM
#50
Posted 14 August 2008 - 05:36 PM
I disagree. Since I would do it for free just to have it published on such a high-quality and well respected site, $25 bucks in my opinion is a pretty sweet deal.No offense but 25 bucks for what looks to be a several hour job (not including watching the game) is lowballing contributors.
Edited by JGalligan, 15 August 2008 - 09:58 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










