What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jason Campbell - buy low (1 Viewer)

redman

Footballguy
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+ | Passing | Rushing |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+| 2006 was | 7 | 110 207 53.1 1297 6.3 10 6 | 24 107 0 || 2007 was | 2 | 28 50 56.0 431 8.6 1 3 | 10 68 0 |Yeah, I'm a Redskins homer and I have Campbell on two of my teams, but I hope you'll take what I have to say here as someone who follows his team closely and who, in fantasy terms, puts his money where his mouth is. Pick up Campbell now. In dynasty, do it with urgency as that is particularly where Campbell is going to have his best value for you. You're never going to have the combination of assuredness that he's progressing and will be good (and perhaps very good or even great) along with the mediocre appearing stats that keep his fantasy price low.

Campbell's stats from two games, amortized over a season, come to 224/400/3448 8/24 80/544/0. Only the passing yardage is strong, but the completion % is merely passable (though already improved over last year) and statistically speaking he's regressed in terms of both TD's and INT's. Those stats won't hold up over this season. I think the rate of Campbell's TD's absolutely increases, his INT rate likely decreases, and his yardage may increase; his rushing stats are probably about right, though he figures to end up with between 1 and 3 rushing TD's, which is nice bonus value.

Here's what your trading partner hopefully won't know, however. Campbell's receivers, have dropped a good half-dozen completions for him in two games. Moss has accounted for half of them, which is very much out of character for him. Cooley dropped a 20+ yard reception on the sideline last night in the opening drive, which is also uncharacteristic for him. Yes drops happen, but they won't happen at this rate over the course of the season. Those drops are why he's not at over a 60% completion rate, and given the lost yardage involved his yards per attempt would be off the charts, almost certainly over 9 yards per completion.

The yards per completion, BTW, is not an illusion here. Hopefully your trading partner will be thinking of that bizarre Hail Mary deflected completion to ARE last week, but as you saw last night they will take shots deep with Campbell this year; they weren't doing much of that last year. Campbell excels at those passes - 'Skins fans will tell you that this isn't Patrick Ramsey here, who had an equally strong arm but was always inaccurate with the deep throws. Again, hopefully your trading partner will think of that missed shot to Moss late in the Eagles game and think that Campbell is erratic on such passes. Most emphatically, he's not; that's just a young QB who got caught up in the moment on what would have been a game-sealing TD on MNF on the road in Philly, IMHO. He's going to hit far more of those than he'll miss.

With a healthy Portis and Betts in there, the running game must be respected, which means play-action (always the best way to set up a deep pass) is even more effective. Both Moss and ARE are very quick and fast, and both are very good getting the deep ball, especially Moss. They're also showing that they know how to use ARE to make him a legit WR2 opposite Moss (BTW, forget about Lloyd; ARE is the WR2 and amazingly enough I'm still seeing him available on waiver wires).

What concerns me about this prediction? Honestly not much, and not anything having to do with the offensive skill positions or Campbell himself. What most concerns me is the offensive line. They've lost both their RT (Jansen, for the season) and their RG (Thomas, for ?????). Replacing Jansen is Todd Wade, who is not much of a drop-off and may even arguably be an improvement over Jansen at this stage of Jansen's career. Fabini replaced Thomas last night, and that's a definite downgrade. Now matter how good or bad those two replacements are, however, the one thing we know they lack is continuity. Fabini's serial false starts were particularly ugly against the Eagles. Nevertheless, take note of the fact that last night on MNF, against a blitzing Philly defense that had to be targeting the right side of that line, they only got to Campbell once for a sack, and I recall that being early in the game, before Thomas left with the injury.

Bottom line: no projections I saw of Campbell had him throwing fewer than around 17-18 TD's this year, and many had him with 20+. That was before he had shown how much he'd progressed after an entire offseason as a starter, and with a healthy Moss and Portis in the lineup. He will only get better as the season goes on, and perhaps dramatically so. Even if you assume that he reaches only the minimum projections, that still means that he's figures to throw 16-17 TD's in the remaining 14 games, which is plenty good for a QB2 on your fantasy team, especially when you figure that he'll add 20-40 rushing yards per game and an occasional rushing TD.

 
more importantly, it looks like Joe Gibbs has finally handed over a good deal of the playcalling to Al Saunders. Last night they were taking risks and making stabs deep downfield and throwing when I know it must have been killing Gibbs to not run the ball with a lead. There were a couple key drops by receivers that should have been made. I think as the season goes on and they get used to catching lasers rather than the softballs Brunell was lobbing them last year, he could put up some decent fantasy numbers.

 
As objective as a Giants fan can be about a Redskin player, I was relatively impressed with Campbell. He showed the ability to stay in the pocket and deliver the ball under pressure and the ability to go to his second or third read on a play. Tempering that just a bit, the overthrow to a wide open Moss was absolutely horrific. Not only did Campbell overthrow one of the fasted guys in the NFL, but it appeared to be too much of a line drive with enough air under the ball.

Generally speaking, decent decision making but it looks like to my amateur eyes that he needs to work on "touch" a bit.

Overall, Not bad development for a young guy.

Edit to add: Not that the Redskins receivers are any great shakes, but perhaps a "lack of touch" had lead to some drops. I haven't watched enough of Campbell to assess for myself and not that I'm comparing him to Farve, but just remembering early in Farve's career, Farve rocketing a pass to a receiver on a short route and the pass ricocheting off him. Technically a drop, but since then Farve has learned to help his receivers by putting more touch on the ball when necessary, to give the receiver a better change to catch the ball. Also, putting the ball in the best position for the receiver to make a play after the catch and not juct make the catch would lead to an increase in YAC.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I want to. I really want to. However I can't forget that horrible overthrow he had to a wide open Santana Moss last night. UGH
I'm chalking that up to a young QB in a division game on the road on national TV who got absolutely jacked that the play call worked so freaking well that he overexcitedly sailed it. Once he gets more than 9 NFL starts under his belt, he'll hit that pass more often than not. That can be corrected through coaching and improved with maturity.What I find interesting is how much hype his two Auburn RBs got after the 2004 season and the perception of Campbell was sort of that he was mostly a beneficiary of Caddy and Ronnie Brown, almost as if he was just along for the ride. The question is, who exactly made who better on that squad?
 
As objective as a Giants fan can be about a Redskin player, I was relatively impressed with Campbell. He showed the ability to stay in the pocket and deliver the ball under pressure and the ability to go to his second or third read on a play. Tempering that just a bit, the overthrow to a wide open Moss was absolutely horrific. Not only did Campbell overthrow one of the fasted guys in the NFL, but it appeared to be too much of a line drive with enough air under the ball.

Generally speaking, decent decision making but it looks like to my amateur eyes that he needs to work on "touch" a bit.

Overall, Not bad development for a young guy.

Edit to add: Not that the Redskins receivers are any great shakes, but perhaps a "lack of touch" had lead to some drops. I haven't watched enough of Campbell to assess for myself and not that I'm comparing him to Farve, but just remembering early in Farve's career, Farve rocketing a pass to a receiver on a short route and the pass ricocheting off him. Technically a drop, but since then Farve has learned to help his receivers by putting more touch on the ball when necessary, to give the receiver a better change to catch the ball. Also, putting the ball in the best position for the receiver to make a play after the catch and not juct make the catch would lead to an increase in YAC.
This is absolutely fair. He throws lazers on the short and intermediate throws, and while his receivers probably "should" catch what hits them in the hands, the fact is that Campbell isn't making a lot of those plays easy. The deep throws are just different, and he does have excellent touch. Don't put too much emphasis on that missed opportunity last night. He excels at that. He reminds me of Rypien in this regard. Rypien, too, had a huge arm and threw a great deep ball, but it took him years to really master the touch on the shorter stuff. Favre's a good comparison too. Fortunately this is not an offense that particularly emphasizes shorter throws the way that, for example, the WCO does. The fact is, though, that if you had to choose, you'd pick a QB who has the arm to throw deep and who already has the deep touch; the touch on the shorter throws can be learned.

If you'd like some reassurance about what I'm saying about Campbell's skill on the deep passes, check out

. Check out the plays beginning at 1:14, 1:37 and 1:49 for examples of deep passing touch/accuracy.
 
I want to. I really want to. However I can't forget that horrible overthrow he had to a wide open Santana Moss last night. UGH
I'm chalking that up to a young QB in a division game on the road on national TV who got absolutely jacked that the play call worked so freaking well that he overexcitedly sailed it. Once he gets more than 9 NFL starts under his belt, he'll hit that pass more often than not. That can be corrected through coaching and improved with maturity.What I find interesting is how much hype his two Auburn RBs got after the 2004 season and the perception of Campbell was sort of that he was mostly a beneficiary of Caddy and Ronnie Brown, almost as if he was just along for the ride. The question is, who exactly made who better on that squad?
Yeah, I think he was just excited.Who made who better on that squad? Who knows? Marcus McNeil? :thumbup:When you have four guys in the same starting lineup to be drafting in the first or second round, it's pretty high powered. I think they were all feeding off of each other. Surely they were all darned good in college.
 
As objective as a Giants fan can be about a Redskin player, I was relatively impressed with Campbell. He showed the ability to stay in the pocket and deliver the ball under pressure and the ability to go to his second or third read on a play. Tempering that just a bit, the overthrow to a wide open Moss was absolutely horrific. Not only did Campbell overthrow one of the fasted guys in the NFL, but it appeared to be too much of a line drive with enough air under the ball.

Generally speaking, decent decision making but it looks like to my amateur eyes that he needs to work on "touch" a bit.

Overall, Not bad development for a young guy.

Edit to add: Not that the Redskins receivers are any great shakes, but perhaps a "lack of touch" had lead to some drops. I haven't watched enough of Campbell to assess for myself and not that I'm comparing him to Farve, but just remembering early in Farve's career, Farve rocketing a pass to a receiver on a short route and the pass ricocheting off him. Technically a drop, but since then Farve has learned to help his receivers by putting more touch on the ball when necessary, to give the receiver a better change to catch the ball. Also, putting the ball in the best position for the receiver to make a play after the catch and not juct make the catch would lead to an increase in YAC.
This is absolutely fair. He throws lazers on the short and intermediate throws, and while his receivers probably "should" catch what hits them in the hands, the fact is that Campbell isn't making a lot of those plays easy.
That touch is one of the biggest reasons people overlook Pennington as a good QB. His receivers almost never drop the ball, because he throws very catchable balls. Not having a laser arm can be a benefit sometimes, and you see it in Pennington's incredibly high completion percentage. People assume that it's because he's throwing lots of short passes (not really true), or off in the flats to the TEs or RBs (even less true), but they forget how soft a ball he throws. That's why he's got the #2 completion percentage of all time, and a problem for guys like Vick and Favre (early on).That being said, I am a Campbell supporter as any of our subscribers know. Here's what I wrote about him in the QBBC article from the pre-season:

Why isn't anyone talking about Jason Campbell? He's a former first round pick that had averaged 6.3 yards per pass and threw four more TDs than INTs in his first year playing (he sat on the bench his entire first year). He's 6-5 with good athleticism and an accurate arm, but he's an afterthought on everyone's draft board. Carson Palmer's the same size, sat his first season and then was about as successful on a per game basis as Campbell was in his second season. Campbell and Santana Moss developed nice chemistry last year, with Moss scoring in half the six games they played in together, and reaching the century mark in two of those games.

With Cooley, Moss, Clinton Portis and Ladell Betts, the Redskins have provided Campbell with some legitimate weapons to make this offense run. Al Saunders has presided over successful offenses recently in St. Louis and Kansas City, and the Washington players should be much more comfortable in year two in this complicated system. If either Antwaan Randle El or Brandon Lloyd can emerge as a reliable third option in the offense, expect the 'Skins to put a lot of points on the board this year.
ARE's emergence seems likely to make that prediction ring true.
 
I've tried to attain Campbell in all my leagues this year. For my dynasty leagues, I tried all off-season. Got him in one, the other the owner just wouldn't budge. :rant:

 
I've got campbell in almost all of my leagues as a backup. I like this kid a lot and even though I aint expecting much now by the 2nd half of the season I see him lighting it up

 
I like Campbell alot after last night. Did you see last night's reviews where he was constantly looking defenders off? Looked like a polished QB to me. And the overthrow on S. Moss. Honestly, that just shows he has a cannon for an arm. Last I checked S. Moss is one of the fastest guys in the league. If he's overthowing him, that's the least of your concerns. Perhaps more concerning is whether the Redskins receiving corps is good enough to consistently get open for him...

 
I like Campbell alot after last night. Did you see last night's reviews where he was constantly looking defenders off? Looked like a polished QB to me. And the overthrow on S. Moss. Honestly, that just shows he has a cannon for an arm. Last I checked S. Moss is one of the fastest guys in the league. If he's overthowing him, that's the least of your concerns. Perhaps more concerning is whether the Redskins receiving corps is good enough to consistently get open for him...
After seeing 2 games, I don't think getting open is a problem. Now catching the ball.....
 
Campbell has potential.

I'll be honest and say that I haven't really had the time to sit down and study the guy, but after watching last night I came away impressed. The guy has never had the look of a guy who won't cut it in the league. And the main thing that really sticks out to me for Campbell as a fantasy player is his ability to run the football. Anybody that has the potential to run for 40-50 yards a game and get the occasional TD has the chance to become a fantasy stud. Not to mention that Santana Moss and Randel El would have been considered a pretty decent 1/2 punch a couple short seasons ago... That is an extremely underrated combo IMO.

 
I want to. I really want to. However I can't forget that horrible overthrow he had to a wide open Santana Moss last night. UGH
I'm chalking that up to a young QB in a division game on the road on national TV who got absolutely jacked that the play call worked so freaking well that he overexcitedly sailed it. Once he gets more than 9 NFL starts under his belt, he'll hit that pass more often than not. That can be corrected through coaching and improved with maturity.What I find interesting is how much hype his two Auburn RBs got after the 2004 season and the perception of Campbell was sort of that he was mostly a beneficiary of Caddy and Ronnie Brown, almost as if he was just along for the ride. The question is, who exactly made who better on that squad?
Of course there was a defender there and he did make Campbell alter the throw. Not much, but enough. Lets not forget that the other guys get paid and that they sometimes affect the outcome of plays/games.
 
I like Campbell alot after last night. Did you see last night's reviews where he was constantly looking defenders off? Looked like a polished QB to me. And the overthrow on S. Moss. Honestly, that just shows he has a cannon for an arm. Last I checked S. Moss is one of the fastest guys in the league. If he's overthowing him, that's the least of your concerns. Perhaps more concerning is whether the Redskins receiving corps is good enough to consistently get open for him...
i loved that part where they showed his eyes making the progression. what I really like about Campbell is his poise and presence in the pocket. guess I'm not used to it after watching Ramsey and Brunell these past years. Ramsey was a tough SOB who stood in the pocket, but he just didn't have any pocket presence. Brunell lost his poise (and balls) too. Hope Campbell continues this development.
 
In re-reading my original post, I neglected to add that the 'Skins are at home this coming game vs. the Giants, a team with a defense that is struggling, particularly against the pass. I think this week is more or less the tipping point on Campbell's value, which adds some urgency.

 
If the 2 QBs i actually drafted get injured and if by some miracle Campbell isnt on the waverline, i'll take for him. Im sure i have a 4 WR or a backup TE i can spare. Come on, seriously, Campbell is ok and may have a bright future, but a GREAT game from him is 2 TDs and 250. How does he ever crack a decent lineup?

 
great analysis Redman, as a fellow Skins homer it is good to see you highlight Campbell's skills and abilities. As a Skins fan it is great to see him developing. The excitement around DC today was electric. Friends, family and co-workers were all impressed with not only the victory last night but with Campbell as well.

The drops by the receivers were disappointing but that improve. Campbell will learn touch and polish on this throws as he settles into the starting QB role.

Next stop the Giants and 3-0 :unsure:

 
I think the Redskin's defense and the reliance on the running game will hold Campbell back as a fantasy QB. As an NFL QB, he is progressing remarkably well, and he's definitely a buy low in dynasty. But I think his upside is limited to Aikman-like numbers, at least for this year. The defense looks much improved to me, with Fletcher / McIntosh at LB and Landry at S now. They aren't dominant by any means, but good enough that Campbell will rarely ever be slinging it around ala Kitna, Palmer, and ahem Derek Anderson, and that will limit his numbers.

 
I think the Redskin's defense and the reliance on the running game will hold Campbell back as a fantasy QB.
That brings up an important question.I'm not alone in ranking the 2006 Redskins as the worst pass defense in the league. They were pitiful.

This year? It's early, but they rank 2nd in yards per pass allowed. I'm not sure where they'd rank if you adjust those yards for SOS and for TDs/INTs, but I'd suspect they'd still be in the top five or ten.

Is that a fluke? To go from miserable to awful isn't unprecedented (the Pats pass D did it last year), but how the 'Skins D plays going forward is an important question. Are Landry, Smoot, Fletcher doing that well? I know McIntosh has good numbers as a start now. But the DL still seems terrible, and I wonder how long a talented back seven can keep it up. I like Landry and Fletcher, but I think all three CBs are more hype than substance.

But I haven't seem them enough. What do you guys think?

 
I think the Redskin's defense and the reliance on the running game will hold Campbell back as a fantasy QB.
That brings up an important question.I'm not alone in ranking the 2006 Redskins as the worst pass defense in the league. They were pitiful.

This year? It's early, but they rank 2nd in yards per pass allowed. I'm not sure where they'd rank if you adjust those yards for SOS and for TDs/INTs, but I'd suspect they'd still be in the top five or ten.

Is that a fluke? To go from miserable to awful isn't unprecedented (the Pats pass D did it last year), but how the 'Skins D plays going forward is an important question. Are Landry, Smoot, Fletcher doing that well? I know McIntosh has good numbers as a start now. But the DL still seems terrible, and I wonder how long a talented back seven can keep it up. I like Landry and Fletcher, but I think all three CBs are more hype than substance.

But I haven't seem them enough. What do you guys think?
It's an interesting set of points. First, the CB's. Springs is a legit CB1 on most teams in the NFL. His coverage and tackling skills are excellent. Smoot and to a larger extent Rogers are more erratic and less reliable. Smoot and Rogers don't seem to know how to actually catch a ball, which would be nice ever once in a while. Rogers seemed to regress last year after a strong end to his rookie year, but the entire defense was atrocious last year and was forced to utilize a soft, cover 2 zone scheme to try to hide weaknesses. I and some others noticed that last night when they went to press coverage Rogers suddenly looked quite effective. This makes sense given that he was drafted to be a cover corner in a man coverage scheme. Their depth with Macklin, Priolieu and Stoutmire is solid.

The safeties aren't an illusion IMHO. Taylor for the first time in his career has a true FS role, which allows him to roam and exhibit his amazing range and closing ability uninhibited by primary run support duties. He's been back playing "centerfield" and in two games has not been challenged once with a deep pass over the middle. Not once. Landry's learning but is already a physical force in his own right. They should be an awesome tandem.

As for the LB's, London Fletcher has been a huge addition and has already established himself as a leader. McIntosh is a completely different player from last year and, through two games anyway, is about as active as any WLB in the league. Washington looks solid, and they're using him as a DE on pasing downs. In particular though, the fact that Fletcher and McIntosh have replaced an out-of-position Lemar Marshall (a converted safety) and a washed up Warrick Holdman, respectively, means that those two positions have gone from liabilities to strengths.

The d-line continues to be the defensive weakness, but it's better than last year. First of all, everyone is healthy save Phillip Daniels who missed the game last night. Griffin in particular was injured last year and really hampered the line's play. Their run stopping ability has been greatly improved by DT Anthony Montgomery who, like McIntosh, worked hard over the offseason and is a completely different player. Carter is a solid pass rusher, but they lack a bookend pass rusher to really pressure the QB.

The overall lack of pressure and the modest talents of Smoot and Rogers mean a relative lack of turnovers from INT's. This figures to be offset to a degree by the more physical brand of play that Landry, McIntosh and Fletcher will bring to the defense, which should help generate fumbles and tipped passes.

Overall, this is a much improved defense which IMHO figures to end up far more similar to the one they fielded in 2005 than in 2006, and should end up in the top 10 in the league.

 
Since this got posted, Campbell\\\'s numbers in 8 additional games are:

+----------+--------------------------+----------------+| WK OPP | CMP ATT PYD TD INT | RSH YD TD |+----------+--------------------------+----------------+| 3 nyg | 16 34 190 1 0 | 4 12 0 || 5 det | 23 29 248 2 0 | 2 0 0 || 6 gnb | 21 37 217 1 1 | 2 6 1 || 7 ari | 12 18 95 0 1 | 2 7 0 || 8 nwe | 21 36 197 1 1 | 1 7 0 || 9 nyj | 12 23 142 0 1 | 2 31 0 || 10 phi | 23 34 215 3 0 | 4 16 0 || 11 dal | 33 54 348 2 1 | 2 18 0 |+----------+--------------------------+----------------+| TOTAL | 161 265 1652 10 5 | 19 97 1 |+----------+--------------------------+----------------+The spike in the last two games is due to the fact that they\\\'re running the spread offense and it\\\'s working. The coaches are putting the ball in Campbell\\\'s hands a LOT more, and it figures to continue. Gibbs loves the guy, and is effusive in his praise, which is something that Gibbs just doesn\\\'t do with his QB\\\'s - he\\\'s basically a milder version of Parcells in that regard. In the last 6 weeks Campbell is ranked 11th in one of my leagues, 10th in another and 11th in the last; over the last three weeks he\'s ranked 7th, 7th and 8th respectively.

At this point in the year it\\\'s probably more pertinent to dynasty than redraft, however the future looks VERY bright for Campbell.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No question Campbell looks good in the hurry up as he has over the last 2 weeks. TB this week is a good test. I do not expect good results (from a fantasy perspective at least).

 
He's getting better and looks like a great passer. Unless there are drastic changes to WAS in the offseason, he should be a good QB2 and maybe a low end QB1 next year. He could use a stud WR.

 
I saw him play in one of the early games and traded for him. In a 2 QB league i got him cheap and he looked like he would be good after a season or so. Its paying off some now.

 
Yeah, I'm a Redskins homer and I have Campbell on two of my teams, but I hope you'll take what I have to say here as someone who follows his team closely and who, in fantasy terms, puts his money where his mouth is. Pick up Campbell now.
You jerk. You know well and good I'm working a deal for this guy. :no: But thanks for the post anyway. :shrug:
 
I think Campbell's future looks pretty good. You have to like that Zorn is comin in and installing the WCO in Washington. This has to bode well compared to the conservative, run-heavy offense that Gibbs was a proponent of. Campbell shows pretty good poise in the pocket for a young passer and he throws the ball pretty decently. He also has a nice WCO weapon at his disposal in Chris Cooley, who should certainly be more utilized. Santana Moss may not be your typical WCO guy but he does have talent. If only he could stay healthy. If the Skins can bring in a guy like D.J. Hackett, a guy with experience in Zorn's system, it would certainly help. It will certainly take 1-2 years to get some experience in the system and get comfortable but long term he looks like a nice player to have as a solid #2 QB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Campbell seems like a guy who's upside is good but not great.

Maybe he'll be a good QB2 but I'd rather take a shot on Aaron Rodgers or Trent Edwards.

 
Campbell seems like a guy who's upside is good but not great.Maybe he'll be a good QB2 but I'd rather take a shot on Aaron Rodgers or Trent Edwards.
Rodgers maybe but Edwards no. That passing offense in Buffalo was atrocious stinky sucky last year. aka - really, really bad
 
Campbell seems like a guy who's upside is good but not great.Maybe he'll be a good QB2 but I'd rather take a shot on Aaron Rodgers or Trent Edwards.
Rodgers maybe but Edwards no. That passing offense in Buffalo was atrocious stinky sucky last year. aka - really, really bad
atrocious stinky sucky? For someone who goes by Englishteacher, I'm rather befuddled by that description.
Its a forum, not a big deal if people dont take the time to put in apostrophes and try to pump up their egos by using unnecessarily wordy phrases like "befuddled"... we all got what he was saying
 
Campbell seems like a guy who's upside is good but not great.Maybe he'll be a good QB2 but I'd rather take a shot on Aaron Rodgers or Trent Edwards.
Rodgers maybe but Edwards no. That passing offense in Buffalo was atrocious stinky sucky last year. aka - really, really bad
atrocious stinky sucky? For someone who goes by Englishteacher, I'm rather befuddled by that description.
Its a forum, not a big deal if people dont take the time to put in apostrophes and try to pump up their egos by using unnecessarily wordy phrases like "befuddled"... we all got what he was saying
I got it too. Just the way I read it and then looking at the poster name made me chuckle is all. Its not a put down in any way.Why is Campbell better than Edwards? Seems like with an off season as the starter Edwards should progress while Campbell has to learn another system(how many is this now? 4?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
+---------------------------------------+-----------------+ | Passing | Rushing |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+| Year TM | G | Comp Att PCT YD Y/A TD INT | Att Yards TD |+----------+-----+---------------------------------------+-----------------+| 2006 was | 7 | 110 207 53.1 1297 6.3 10 6 | 24 107 0 || 2007 was | 2 | 28 50 56.0 431 8.6 1 3 | 10 68 0 |Yeah, I'm a Redskins homer and I have Campbell on two of my teams, but I hope you'll take what I have to say here as someone who follows his team closely and who, in fantasy terms, puts his money where his mouth is. Pick up Campbell now. In dynasty, do it with urgency as that is particularly where Campbell is going to have his best value for you. You're never going to have the combination of assuredness that he's progressing and will be good (and perhaps very good or even great) along with the mediocre appearing stats that keep his fantasy price low.

Campbell's stats from two games, amortized over a season, come to 224/400/3448 8/24 80/544/0. Only the passing yardage is strong, but the completion % is merely passable (though already improved over last year) and statistically speaking he's regressed in terms of both TD's and INT's. Those stats won't hold up over this season. I think the rate of Campbell's TD's absolutely increases, his INT rate likely decreases, and his yardage may increase; his rushing stats are probably about right, though he figures to end up with between 1 and 3 rushing TD's, which is nice bonus value.

Here's what your trading partner hopefully won't know, however. Campbell's receivers, have dropped a good half-dozen completions for him in two games. Moss has accounted for half of them, which is very much out of character for him. Cooley dropped a 20+ yard reception on the sideline last night in the opening drive, which is also uncharacteristic for him. Yes drops happen, but they won't happen at this rate over the course of the season. Those drops are why he's not at over a 60% completion rate, and given the lost yardage involved his yards per attempt would be off the charts, almost certainly over 9 yards per completion.

The yards per completion, BTW, is not an illusion here. Hopefully your trading partner will be thinking of that bizarre Hail Mary deflected completion to ARE last week, but as you saw last night they will take shots deep with Campbell this year; they weren't doing much of that last year. Campbell excels at those passes - 'Skins fans will tell you that this isn't Patrick Ramsey here, who had an equally strong arm but was always inaccurate with the deep throws. Again, hopefully your trading partner will think of that missed shot to Moss late in the Eagles game and think that Campbell is erratic on such passes. Most emphatically, he's not; that's just a young QB who got caught up in the moment on what would have been a game-sealing TD on MNF on the road in Philly, IMHO. He's going to hit far more of those than he'll miss.

With a healthy Portis and Betts in there, the running game must be respected, which means play-action (always the best way to set up a deep pass) is even more effective. Both Moss and ARE are very quick and fast, and both are very good getting the deep ball, especially Moss. They're also showing that they know how to use ARE to make him a legit WR2 opposite Moss (BTW, forget about Lloyd; ARE is the WR2 and amazingly enough I'm still seeing him available on waiver wires).

What concerns me about this prediction? Honestly not much, and not anything having to do with the offensive skill positions or Campbell himself. What most concerns me is the offensive line. They've lost both their RT (Jansen, for the season) and their RG (Thomas, for ?????). Replacing Jansen is Todd Wade, who is not much of a drop-off and may even arguably be an improvement over Jansen at this stage of Jansen's career. Fabini replaced Thomas last night, and that's a definite downgrade. Now matter how good or bad those two replacements are, however, the one thing we know they lack is continuity. Fabini's serial false starts were particularly ugly against the Eagles. Nevertheless, take note of the fact that last night on MNF, against a blitzing Philly defense that had to be targeting the right side of that line, they only got to Campbell once for a sack, and I recall that being early in the game, before Thomas left with the injury.

Bottom line: no projections I saw of Campbell had him throwing fewer than around 17-18 TD's this year, and many had him with 20+. That was before he had shown how much he'd progressed after an entire offseason as a starter, and with a healthy Moss and Portis in the lineup. He will only get better as the season goes on, and perhaps dramatically so. Even if you assume that he reaches only the minimum projections, that still means that he's figures to throw 16-17 TD's in the remaining 14 games, which is plenty good for a QB2 on your fantasy team, especially when you figure that he'll add 20-40 rushing yards per game and an occasional rushing TD.
This still reads pretty good even after the passage of a year.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top