Steven Mann
Footballguy
Who'd you rather replace Caddy with... Thoughts?
Poor Guy
Poor Guy
Last edited by a moderator:
I hear ya.. Question is was Pittman also available...I just picked up Graham, so of course Graham
I hear ya.. Question is was Pittman also available...I just picked up Graham, so of course Graham
Maybe gets activated... (imo) Don't see him in the mix now. But this has been a crazy year thru 4 weeks... Who knowsDarby?
Its early... However the 'poll' reflects the same thoughts...I voted for Pittman, but to be honest I have no clue... Looks like a true RBBC to me...
Based on Pittman's history I would humbly dissagree with this. Pittman has had a few shots at being the #1 guy including in Tampa and he failed every time.Pittman. He is a much more effective runner. He knows the system to a T, and is a great receiving option too. Graham may or may not get the goaline carries. I mean, he was stuffed 4 times in a row at the goal line today. I think that Graham may have just been a quick flare up, D. Wynn-like.
I have to agree with Widdow Maker here. In 2004, Pittman was the starting back in Tampa beginning in Week 4 and put up pretty good numbers:http://www.pro-football-reference.com/game...ttMi00.htm#2004Based on Pittman's history I would humbly dissagree with this. Pittman has had a few shots at being the #1 guy including in Tampa and he failed every time.Pittman. He is a much more effective runner. He knows the system to a T, and is a great receiving option too. Graham may or may not get the goaline carries. I mean, he was stuffed 4 times in a row at the goal line today. I think that Graham may have just been a quick flare up, D. Wynn-like.
:( My reasoning also.I have to agree with Widdow Maker here. In 2004, Pittman was the starting back in Tampa beginning in Week 4 and put up pretty good numbers:http://www.pro-football-reference.com/game...ttMi00.htm#2004Based on Pittman's history I would humbly dissagree with this. Pittman has had a few shots at being the #1 guy including in Tampa and he failed every time.Pittman. He is a much more effective runner. He knows the system to a T, and is a great receiving option too. Graham may or may not get the goaline carries. I mean, he was stuffed 4 times in a row at the goal line today. I think that Graham may have just been a quick flare up, D. Wynn-like.
WK OPP | RSH YD | RECYD | TD |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| 4 den | 15 72 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 nor | 15 51 | 29 | 0 |
| 6 stl | 13 37 | 16 | 1 |
| 7 chi | 23 109 | 55 | 1 |
| 9 kan | 15 128 | 30 | 3 |
| 10 atl | 20 62 | 16 | 0 |
| 11 sfo | 21 106 | 0 | 2 |
| 12 car | 18 29 | 134 | 2 |
| 13 atl | 17 68 | 12 | 1 |
| 14 sdg | 12 42 | 46 | 0 |
| 15 nor | 24 131 | 10 | 0 |
| 16 car | 10 41 | 13 | 0 |
| 17 ari | 16 50 | 30 | 0 |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| TOTAL | 219 926 | 391 | 10
Over 1300 combined yards and 10 TDs in 13 games is pretty good. There is no guarantee that he puts up the same numbers again - he's older and Graham will probably steal a few carries, but, given the fact he's done well in Gruden's system in the past and clearly out-performed Graham today, I think Pittman will be the primary back and is the guy to get.
I dont know really, didnt look, but I think Graham is the starter there. Pittman is a 3rd down back type of guy, and I think Gruden views him that way. But Ill find out next week if Im the idiot or not.Steven Mann said:I hear ya.. Question is was Pittman also available...Swampy said:I just picked up Graham, so of course Graham
I don't believe Pittman is a COP 3rd down type.I dont know really, didnt look, but I think Graham is the starter there. Pittman is a 3rd down back type of guy, and I think Gruden views him that way. But Ill find out next week if Im the idiot or not.Steven Mann said:I hear ya.. Question is was Pittman also available...Swampy said:I just picked up Graham, so of course Graham
Not a man crush at all. The fact is he was a top 12 RB when he started in 04.. I won 2 leagues with him. Most KNOW he can be a legit #2.. Graham is just a flyer with upside.Lots of man crush for Pittman here.So just why has Ernesto scored all the TD's? this is a real question - I did not see either of the last two games
Was Pittman still playing FB and blocking in the GL packages? I didn't watch the game. He'd been playing FB when Williams was playing earlier in the year though. What other FB do they even have on the roster now anyway?So just why has Ernesto scored all the TD's?
The schedule for TBB is the key here....they face the esaiest schedule for running the ball in '07.That makes Graham the man.....Pittman is Gruden's "Bull Dog" but he's a roll player.I dont know really, didnt look, but I think Graham is the starter there. Pittman is a 3rd down back type of guy, and I think Gruden views him that way. But Ill find out next week if Im the idiot or not.Steven Mann said:I hear ya.. Question is was Pittman also available...Swampy said:I just picked up Graham, so of course Graham
Why would the Bucs bring in a less-experienced pass protector, and a less-skilled pass catcher, on 3rd down?I'm not sure how the touches are going to be split here, but Pittman's biggest advantage over Graham is his value in passing situations.Pittman as the main RBwith Graham as the 3rd down COP.This makes total sense, imo.
It sounds like there are lots of replies from guys who haven't watched either play this year.I've watched every game...my opinion isITTMAN - still has a great burst and speed to the outside, good receiver, was playing FB with CW healthy, worst short-yardage back in the NFLGRAHAM - straight ahead runner...that's it pretty much, runs downhill and hard, but misses holes if they are more than 5 feet to either side of himBoth have serious limitations. Pittman looked better yesterday, but will NEVER be a full-time back because of his inability to get tough yards.RBBC.
Thank you for posting this.Arschloch said:Update from rotoworld this morning:Michael Pittman and Earnest Graham will share the running back duties in Tampa following Cadillac Williams' season-ending knee injury.Pittman will start games and get the bulk of the load, with Graham as a change of pace and rookie Kenneth Darby coming off the practice squad. Pittman has the best all-around game and should be your No. 1 priority on waiver wires if he's available. Graham is also worth stashing in all leagues.Source: St. Petersburg Times
davearm said:Why would the Bucs bring in a less-experienced pass protector, and a less-skilled pass catcher, on 3rd down?I'm not sure how the touches are going to be split here, but Pittman's biggest advantage over Graham is his value in passing situations.Ron_Mexico said:Pittman as the main RBwith Graham as the 3rd down COP.This makes total sense, imo.
I might have too. Westy is BYE, and Im looking at James, Green, MJD, and Betts. If Green is healthy I might start him, but I dont know if they are on a BYE week yet.anyone going to play any of these guys against Indy this weekend.
Gruden has never seemed to make decisions based on age. He loves veteran players playing for him, so I don't thing age really matters here.Also, I don't know how much of this will play a role, but considering the seriousness of Caddy's injury, he might not be their #1 runningback next year (or part of next year). Pittman is 32 years old, compared to Graham being 27. They just might give Graham a better shot or give him more time to get into sort of a leading back type role, just for the sake of seeing what they do or do'n't have with him. Just a thought.
As a matter of fact it might be the other way.Gruden has never seemed to make decisions based on age. He loves veteran players playing for him, so I don't thing age really matters here.Also, I don't know how much of this will play a role, but considering the seriousness of Caddy's injury, he might not be their #1 runningback next year (or part of next year). Pittman is 32 years old, compared to Graham being 27. They just might give Graham a better shot or give him more time to get into sort of a leading back type role, just for the sake of seeing what they do or do'n't have with him. Just a thought.
Generally speaking, people like new, shiny things. Seems to me that the 2007 numbers & usage date and the historical data both favor Pittman, but he's not new or shiny. So, people vote for the rook.Personally, and as a Caddy, Pittman and Graham owner, I think it's Pittman. Only time will tell...I'm very surprised with this poll, I thought that Pittman would be the clear winning here.
In the injury thread (Post #132) Gruden is being quoted as saying that Pittman will be the workhorse.............I'm casting my lot with Pittman.Generally speaking, people like new, shiny things. Seems to me that the 2007 numbers & usage date and the historical data both favor Pittman, but he's not new or shiny. So, people vote for the rook.Personally, and as a Caddy, Pittman and Graham owner, I think it's Pittman. Only time will tell...I'm very surprised with this poll, I thought that Pittman would be the clear winning here.
Graham had a bunch of carries inside the 5 to mitigate his YPC.I do expect Graham at this point to see more goaline work but I was impressed at the margin at YPC in yesterday's game. They both saw the ball around 15 times and Pittman and a distinct YPC advantage over Graham.