Uhhh, no. Not even close.Nope. And that should be a fumble and a touchback. Bengals ball.
How do you figure? The ball was coming out before he was down. The ball was fumbled forward out of the end zone. Seems simple to me.Uhhh, no. Not even close.Nope. And that should be a fumble and a touchback. Bengals ball.
didnt go through endzone, out at 1.How do you figure? The ball was coming out before he was down. The ball was fumbled forward out of the end zone. Seems simple to me.Uhhh, no. Not even close.Nope. And that should be a fumble and a touchback. Bengals ball.
it looked like he lost control before he was on the ground...the question is whether the ball was fumbled out of bounds or into the endzone. I'm not really sure, but it looked like it was fumbled out of bounds...also, Chad and Housh, 0 targets after two Bengals possessions.Sammy ripping up -39 yards on the play...well he is shot for all you roto-junkies out there.
I thought it was rather clear that the ball went OOB, not in the endzone.How do you figure? The ball was coming out before he was down. The ball was fumbled forward out of the end zone. Seems simple to me.Uhhh, no. Not even close.Nope. And that should be a fumble and a touchback. Bengals ball.
Well, that was quite a swing.Sammy ripping up -39 yards on the play...well he is shot for all you roto-junkies out there.
why can no one cover Mike Vrabel?seriously? is it a mystery that they're going to pass to him? he's not Antonio Gates over here.
and Dahani Jones is not Mike Vrabel.why can no one cover Mike Vrabel?seriously? is it a mystery that they're going to pass to him? he's not Antonio Gates over here.
I think they said Morris was shaken up and taken to the locker room, which is also not good news. I can't live off the 5 pts he has so far. I need some more, come back Sammy!Lets put in a slow white guy at the goal line. Leave Morris in ya cheatin jackasses.Can you tell who I have starting as my RB2 this week?
Give them credit for the play fake. If Vrabel is covered well, and the Pats run the ball to his side, the RB likely walks in for the TD.why can no one cover Mike Vrabel?seriously? is it a mystery that they're going to pass to him? he's not Antonio Gates over here.
When they challenge the play that way, the refs look at the whole play. If they only challenge that it was a fumble, that's all they can look at. They basically got the refs to look at two things to overturn instead of one.What a dumb challenge...WTF? Why wouldn't they challenge whether the ball was fumbled through the end zone? Didn't challenging the ruling on the field that the player stayed in bounds basically become a lose lose challenge for the Bengals? If the ref rules the player stayed in bounds: NE ball on the 2.If the ref rules the player stepped out of bounds: NE ball on the 4.
it's not like they ran some wacky play that no one has ever seen before. and it's not like that play is unstoppable. they run it 8 times a year or some ####. i blame the Bengals D more than credit the Pats offense.Give them credit for the play fake. If Vrabel is covered well, and the Pats run the ball to his side, the RB likely walks in for the TD.why can no one cover Mike Vrabel?seriously? is it a mystery that they're going to pass to him? he's not Antonio Gates over here.
38 - 0Finless said:Pats are dominant.
Possibly, but that would take two seasons. Let's focus on this one first.38 - 0Finless said:Pats are dominant.
you never know, after all antonio chatman does have a few looksFinless said:They may squeeze out a touchdown but I doubt it.38 - 0Finless said:Pats are dominant.
I am not sure that was Morris. I think it was Faulk being misidentified by Tirico on the screen that was called back on the hold.Morris is obvioulsy back in, maybe Belichek wanted to fake them out![]()
I think he was PO'd that Welker did not break off the route earlier like he was supposed to on the blitz read.are they gettin in bradys head? doesn't look like he likes getting hit
They need exactly 38 tonight to have 4 - 38s in a row. Its their magic number.Game 1 - 38 to 14Game 2 - 38 to 14Game 3 - 38 to 7Possibly, but that would take two seasons. Let's focus on this one first.38 - 0Finless said:Pats are dominant.
Um, he wanted the flag to give them a first down instead of third and 23.are they gettin in bradys head? doesn't look like he likes getting hit
Oh. I thought you were talking about their record. 19-0 would be a perfect season, so 38-0 would be two.They need exactly 38 tonight to have 4 - 38s in a row. Its their magic number.Possibly, but that would take two seasons. Let's focus on this one first.38 - 0Finless said:Pats are dominant.