Ken Darby ran hard and did well in the preseason, moving the chains... but in the 2nd half of preseason games.
IIRC I don't believe he got a start nor did he ever play with the first team, but he did look good when in.
I think he has good potential and is better than anything Zach Crockett allegedly has left.
It wouldn't surprise me to see him get 10-12 carries this week to see how he does against Tennessee.
Still don't understand this love affair. Is this a "want to be on the bottom floor so I look smart on the 5% shot it pans out" thing or what? Because he really displayed nothing special in the preseason, or his senior year in college. And then he was cut.And then not picked up.
And then only picked back up due to 3 injuries.
And now they're looking for somebody else.
So please, explain this to me.
Okay, I'll try to explain it to you. Many people have huge holes a running back with all the injuries to starters. Looking smart aside, some folks in larger leagues are scrambling (with 6 teams on the bye this week) to merely fill out a starting team. Is anyone salivating all over themselves that Darby will be the savior of their season? No. But if he went and scored you 5 points this week and you won by 4, then yes, I guess you might feel pretty smart. Did that explain it?
No, that doesn't explain it. He didn't start "pimping" this guy this week. More like months ago.Try to keep up, thanks.
Sir, I am trying to keep up. But you seem to be refering to "he's" that didn't start "pimping" people, and I may be in the minority, but I have no idea who or what you are talking about. Perhaps if you are the one trying to look smart, you can use the PM option and talk to your phantom "He" on a personal level and let the rest of us discuss how their might be room on a large fantasy roster for a guy who is the backup to an almost completely unknown commodity in Graham.If you have a bench spot available, picking up a guy like Darby before he has a nice week can be the bye week filler that saves a fantasy season or the throw in piece of a trade that makes a Championship.
But I am sure that I am wrong. So, I'll keep checking back, in the hopes that you continue to keep me up to speed.
I believe that the "he" is me, as I'm quoted here.Capella has his own rationale for beating on this, but I'll try to explain this to him - not that I think he will listen, but perhaps you will.
Darby wasn't a terrible back in college, nor was he a bad prospect - else he wouldn't have been drafted.
Tampa used him and liked what they saw - regardless of what is said by Capella above.
They cut him to try and stash him on the practice squad. He wasn't floundering about on the waiver wire for weeks - he was one of the last cuts of the preseason and then added to the practice squad less than 24 hours later.
The "cut / sign to PS" move is commonplace in the NFL. Players that are (A) prospects (B) behind several players on the depth chart and © have PS eligibility are often processed this way so that a team can have a deeper pool of talent. Dallas tried this with Matt Moore and got burnt.
Again, if they didn't like his talent, he wouldn't have been drafted, rostered, then added back to the PS.He has the raw talent to put up numbers in the NFL - the question is if he is ready to do it in his rookie year. I don't think that they believe he is, so they are adding veterans to not expect too much from him (and also because they lost 2 RBs).