Andy Hicks
Footballguy
Post all comments here
Yeh Who!Who started in the backfield for Oakland?
I don't think there's a soul out there watching this game.Is Lamont even playing??
Isn't this game only being shown in Oakland and Houston and blacked out everywhere else? I believe I heard that earlier in the week.I don't think there's a soul out there watching this game.Is Lamont even playing??
Raiders didn't sell out so the game is blacked out there & the NFL took pity on them & is allowing the Indy Pats game to be aired instead.The only city in the entire nation not getting the Indy Pats game, is Houston. Man I feel for 'em.Isn't this game only being shown in Oakland and Houston and blacked out everywhere else? I believe I heard that earlier in the week.I don't think there's a soul out there watching this game.Is Lamont even playing??
So they say.McCown is SOOOOOOO much better than Culpepper.![]()
It's a little disconcerting that FBG had Lamont at #12 prior to the game... I played him in one league debating between him, Grant and McGahee... and didn't see anything about him being inactive. And as I'm writing this, he gets a catch for 13 yds and a rush for 5. But why did Fargas get 7 first?Is Lamont even playing??
Smart receiver if you ask me.It's listed on my DirectTV Channel guide but my receiver refuses to tune to it.
There have been several threads in the Shark pool this week about how Jordan may be on the outs and how Fargas would get a chance. While nothing was known for sure, if you started Jordan and had other good options, well, you should have known better if you were paying attention around here.It's a little disconcerting that FBG had Lamont at #12 prior to the game... I played him in one league debating between him, Grant and McGahee... and didn't see anything about him being inactive. And as I'm writing this, he gets a catch for 13 yds and a rush for 5. But why did Fargas get 7 first?Is Lamont even playing??
Remember, these are the Raiders we're talking about.It's a little disconcerting that FBG had Lamont at #12 prior to the game... I played him in one league debating between him, Grant and McGahee... and didn't see anything about him being inactive. And as I'm writing this, he gets a catch for 13 yds and a rush for 5. But why did Fargas get 7 first?Is Lamont even playing??
I'm curious who was actually in there during the first series that was a three and out, since then the box score kinda looks like they are alternating.It's a little disconcerting that FBG had Lamont at #12 prior to the game... I played him in one league debating between him, Grant and McGahee... and didn't see anything about him being inactive. And as I'm writing this, he gets a catch for 13 yds and a rush for 5. But why did Fargas get 7 first?Is Lamont even playing??
Kiffin said all week long that he would game plan Fargas in more.It's a little disconcerting that FBG had Lamont at #12 prior to the game... I played him in one league debating between him, Grant and McGahee... and didn't see anything about him being inactive. And as I'm writing this, he gets a catch for 13 yds and a rush for 5. But why did Fargas get 7 first?Is Lamont even playing??
I don't think anybody is watching this turd of a game.How does McCown look? Better than Cpep? Not expecting, just hoping.
See above.I am wondering how bad these INTs look? Homers?
At this point Jordan is the leading receiver on the team.Jordan finally in the game - Im shocked. Why would the Raiders want to use their best RB? I f'n hate this team.
Is it too late to bring back Aaron Brooks?Or Jeff George?Wow, I didn't expect much, but McCown is awful stat wise.
Even Andrew Walter would be an improvement.Is Russel active? Becuase if he is... he's GOT to be better than McCown right now.
Raiders | Week 9 InactivesSun, 4 Nov 2007 12:26:20 -0800Is Russel active? Becuase if he is... he's GOT to be better than McCown right now.
That's too bad, considering that he's not as good a player as a completely healthy Jordan.Fargas starting to roll it seems.
Definitely better than Jordan right now though. You have to wonder if Jordan will ever be able to get back to 100% again.That's too bad, considering that he's not as good a player as a completely healthy Jordan.Fargas starting to roll it seems.
Was that pun intended?Definitely better than Jordan right now though. You have to wonder if Jordan will ever be able to get back to 100% again.That's too bad, considering that he's not as good a player as a completely healthy Jordan.Fargas starting to roll it seems.
No, I'm not clever.Was that pun intended?Definitely better than Jordan right now though. You have to wonder if Jordan will ever be able to get back to 100% again.That's too bad, considering that he's not as good a player as a completely healthy Jordan.Fargas starting to roll it seems.
Aw c'mon now. I guess the blind squirrel applies then.No, I'm not clever.Was that pun intended?Definitely better than Jordan right now though. You have to wonder if Jordan will ever be able to get back to 100% again.That's too bad, considering that he's not as good a player as a completely healthy Jordan.Fargas starting to roll it seems.
Yep! He definitely has his groove on.Fargas starting to roll it seems.
He did, you just weren't paying attention.It was a 50/50 split in carries last week & all this week leading up to the game, Kiffin had been saying he was going to get Fargas even more involved. There were a few threads here in the Shark Pool talking about it.As a Jordan and Fargas owner, I could care less who the starter/primary ball carrier is, but it would have been nice for Lane to have let me know before game time.
but against this team I cannot imagine that these stats couldn't be equaled or surpassed by Lamont. Consider that the last three weeks Jordan played against some very good run Ds....If you need a comparison see Larry Johnsons first several weeks.Yep! He definitely has his groove on.Fargas starting to roll it seems.
I think I just saw him on a milk carton, so I don't believe so...Is Curry still playing?
I had read the rumors of Lamont being cut and I did notice the carry split and the Lane statement. However, I tried not to read too much into the coach speak as they always lie through their teeth (i.e. Dungy saying RBBC with Keith last week and then Addai totally dominating the touches last week and this week so far). I try to read between the lines but love the hard cold facts. How hard would it have been for Lane to say "Fargas is our starter"? I will win but stilll point to the shirt.He did, you just weren't paying attention.It was a 50/50 split in carries last week & all this week leading up to the game, Kiffin had been saying he was going to get Fargas even more involved. There were a few threads here in the Shark Pool talking about it.As a Jordan and Fargas owner, I could care less who the starter/primary ball carrier is, but it would have been nice for Lane to have let me know before game time.