What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Week 13 Picks - Part 2*** (1 Viewer)

Jeff Pasquino

Footballguy
First of all, take these all with a grain of salt.

Secondly, these are for educational purposes only.

Third - I think it is a major mistake to try and predict all games.

My ranking system is based on "Stars", which gauges how strongly I feel about each pick.



Last week I had a fast start, going 5-0 with Thanksgiving picks followed by a mediocre Sunday, 7-5 but still a winning day. Not up to par from the past four weeks, where I went 10-4, 9-1 (including my Stone Cold :IBTL: of the Year), then 9-6 and then 7-3. Five winning weeks and 47-19 isn't a bad streak. That's a 71% winning percentage, which is :eek: no matter how you slice it. I've heard a few people wanting my Thursday selections ASAP, so I'll do just that if I like the game.... which I do this week.

That game's over, and a good thing it did go "OVER" as I said it would because Favre and Co. cost me the Green Bay Pick. I went 2-2, so let's try and do better.

So - how about some picks?

Let's go:



*ONE STAR GAMES*

Detroit Lions (+4) at Minnesota Vikings - (1 star)

Like a moth to a bug zapper, I can't help myself with Detroit in a dome. Their offense is just too inviting. I know that Minnesota will be shutting down Kevin Jones and the ground game, so Kitna better last for 60 minutes. If he does, I think Calvin, Roy W and SMac can find the promised land and put up 24-27 points. That should be good enough. Oh yeah - both defenses are opportunistic and force a lot of turnovers. Couple all that with the anemic passing attack for the guys in purple and I see a pick 'em / FG type game, and I will take the Lions and the points.

Jacksonville Jaguars (+7) at Indianapolis Colts - (1 star)

The Colts struggle against the Jags. Personally, I think that Jacksonville is doing it with mirrors. Everyone is talking about Garrard and his lack of interceptions, but has anyone else noticed that he also has a lack of touchdowns? He's played in 8 games and has 9 TDs, what's up with that? Well, this game is more about the points than anything, and I think Jacksonville will hypnotize Peyton Manning into keeping this game close somehow. I don't know how they will do it aside from running MJD and Fraud Taylor 20 times each, but hey, whatever works. My best advice - don't look directly at this game, it'll drive you crazy.

San Diego Chargers at Kansas City Chiefs (OVER 37.5) - (1 star)

There are so many reasons why this game could be 20+ on both sides. Tomlinson is about the first two or three, because that's about how often he should score. That's also about the number of times Philip Rivers could throw to a red jersey, setting up short fields for Damon Huard (who is better than Brody Croyle, sorry kid). Kolby Smith? Well, guess what - Smith ran wild against Oakland last week, and believe it or not the Chargers aren't terribly better against the ground attack. The only reason that Baltimore didn't do better is, well, they stink. Expect 100 yards and a TD from the kid - FROM? - Luahvull.

Cincinnati Bengals at Pittsburgh Steelers (UNDER 45.5...44....43...) - (1 star)

This game was at 45.5 on Friday (sorry folks) and looks to be rapidly decreasing. I'd still like it under 43 if the weather is terrible, and that's the entire play here. Heinz Field doesn't cut the mustard and no one can play catch up on that bad turf. No one relishes playing there.... ok I'll stop. If the weather is bad and the kicking is impossible, take the under 43. (I reserve the right to use 45.5 and/or rescind this pick if it is sunny - so take your risk on the weatherman now or then.....) To play fair, I'll leave the pick as "Under 43" for the purpose of this here and say play it now.

**TWO STAR GAMES**



Cleveland Browns at Arizona Cardinals (OVER 51) - (2 stars)

Points, points, points. I don't see how they cannot be scored here. Kurt Warner through for a quarter-mile last week, and don't buy into the "Larry Fitzgerald is questionable". That came out of nowhere. Even if he is banged up, I'll take Fitzy at 50% with Boldin and Bryant Johnson (Sleeper alert). Even bigger sleeper is Pope at TE, as the Brownies are hurting in their secondary and at LB. The same can be said about the Cards, and that's not good news when you face Derek Anderson - I'm sure we all guessed that we'd say that 3 months ago, right? KW2 will rip apart the middle of the field, and Edwards is the quietest Top 10 WR in the league. Couple this with two teams that can move the ball on the ground if they need it with some veteran backs, and I see this game at 40 points by halftime. 34-31 seems pretty likely here, so 51 points doesn't frighten me, especially in a nice setting.



New England Patriots at Baltimore Ravens (UNDER 51.5) - (2 stars)

I said it last week and I'll say it again - I really don't like Unders. It's the only thing you can wager on that could be over in the third quarter, and that sucks. However, on Monday night, I really think that Ray Ray's pride will be at stake here. They'll follow the Colts and Eagles' gameplans and try and execute it the same way, but it won't be enough. The Ravens will lose this game, but the O/U is the only interesting angle I can find here. The best part of it is that I've finally figured out a way for the Ravens' inept offense to help. NE 38-6.



***THREE STAR GAMES***

Philadelphia Eagles (-3) vs. Seattle Seahawks - (3 stars)

Hey now, before you break out the :unsure: calls here, just listen. I am the LAST person who would want to call an Eagles win for fear of it all blowing up in my face, but I cannot deny what I'm seeing here. Philly played great against New England, and the Seahawks are winning because other teams are giving them games. They shouldn't have won last week (but I'll take it) as Bulger was carving them up, and now they are suffering from injuries in every way possible. DJ Hackett is hurt again, Tatupu is dinged, both of their lines are at less than full strength, and even worse - Shaun Alexander is playing. Kiss of death right there. What could get worse for Seattle? Hasselbeck is hurt and the Eagles smell blood in the water. It also hurts the Seahawks to travel from Seattle to St. Louis, then back home, then all the way back east to Philly - the second longest trip in the NFL I believe. That's a stacked deck against them before kickoff. A 1PM start for a West Coast team doesn't help matters, nor does facing an Eagles team that is firing on all cylinders without McNabb and looking pretty good on both sides of the ball. Having Brian Westbrook can do that for you. I've heard this story before about a backup QB coming in for the Eagles and them running off a streak in December, haven't you? I hear Rocky music.....or is that Adrian's "You Can't WIN!!!" I could go on, but I think you see why I can't steer clear. Eagles win this game by more than 3.



:IBTL: of the Week - Philadelphia Eagles

***SUCKER BET GAME***



New York Giants (-2.5) at Chicago Bears

Yuck. The Giants are favored? Didn't Chicago win a game solely because of Devin Hester? Has their passing game, QB situation, and ground game all improve overnight? The Bear defense is hurting, but Plaxico is hurting more. Both teams are the walking wounded and the Giants are in their typical second half swoon. The game started as a "Pick 'em" and the New York money came hard on it. I'm steering clear.

Enjoy.

 
I think the Vikings -4 is the play to go with. You have a very good defense against a suspect OL of Detroit, combined with Kitna's inability to make good decisions when pressured and that spells problems for Detroit. Not only will they slow down Kevin Jones, but they will force several bad passes. Detroit is already not a good third down team. I see Kitna throwing the ball 45-50 times in what might be a 350-yard game, but the Lions won't win. Throw in Adrian Peterson back in the lineup and this has me thinking even more towards MIN. Vikes should win this by 10 pts or more. Detroit will get the majority of their passing yardage in the 2nd half, but it will be too late.

 
I like

Over 35.5 on SF/Car

Philly -3 **this one pains me to say**

Minn -4

and

Mia -1.5

yep, you heard it here first. Miami's gonna win.

 
Appreciate the thoughts, Jeff. I was already hitting most of these anyway, but it's nice to get agreement. I hesitate to do the under in any game involving NE, but Baltimore is so bad on offense, and even a 42-7 game is under 51. So I'll hit that one too. Good luck all.....

 
I think the Vikings -4 is the play to go with. You have a very good defense against a suspect OL of Detroit, combined with Kitna's inability to make good decisions when pressured and that spells problems for Detroit. Not only will they slow down Kevin Jones, but they will force several bad passes. Detroit is already not a good third down team. I see Kitna throwing the ball 45-50 times in what might be a 350-yard game, but the Lions won't win. Throw in Adrian Peterson back in the lineup and this has me thinking even more towards MIN. Vikes should win this by 10 pts or more. Detroit will get the majority of their passing yardage in the 2nd half, but it will be too late.
You'll notice that was just a 1-star game for me. I think it is possible, but I'm banking on the lack of a pass attack from MIN.
 
BigTuna said:
I like Over 35.5 on SF/CarPhilly -3 **this one pains me to say**Minn -4andMia -1.5 yep, you heard it here first. Miami's gonna win.
I believe the Miami part. I probably could have added that one in. This is their best shot to win.SF/Car over - that could happen. So could 6-3.
 
Appreciate the thoughts, Jeff. I was already hitting most of these anyway, but it's nice to get agreement. I hesitate to do the under in any game involving NE, but Baltimore is so bad on offense, and even a 42-7 game is under 51. So I'll hit that one too. Good luck all.....
Sure thing. Glad you enjoyed the read.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey Jeff dont you think NO looks good at -3 with Garcia out? What about SD -4?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey Jeff dont you think NO looks good at -3 with Garcia out? What about SD -4?
:thumbup: [Kramer]

Why don't you just TELL me what movie game you'd like to see?

[Kramer]

I picked New Orleans, but it isn't star-worthy. SD -4 against KC? Really? Rivers still plays for the Chargers, right?

 
Not sure if you realize this at all, but most books in Vegas have Philly at -3(-125) meaning you have to put up $125 just to win $100, although some have it at -120. Naturally if you're just counting your record and not calculating the juice(which is usually just -110) then taking all of the games which are greater than -110 will make you look good in the long run probably.

 
Jeff, what do you think about the Over 40 on PHI / SEA??

I know there's talk of freezing rain in PHI, but the Hawks offense has been held to less than 20 pts only 2 out of 11 games this season (with and without Alexander and Hackett). The Eagles shoudn't have a problem topping 20+ pts on their own at home.

 
The only game I bet on this week was KC +6. Line opened at 4 and public is all over SD. I think this is much closer and lower scoring than people think.

 
Not sure if you realize this at all, but most books in Vegas have Philly at -3(-125) meaning you have to put up $125 just to win $100, although some have it at -120. Naturally if you're just counting your record and not calculating the juice(which is usually just -110) then taking all of the games which are greater than -110 will make you look good in the long run probably.
Not sure if you realize this at all, but if you had actually listened to me the first time you posted in one of my pick threads, you would have hit the Stone Cold :hangover: of the Year and you wouldn't be sweating the -120 or -125 vig.As for your last statement, feel free to walk through my picks and see what the lines were at the time. Come back when you have at least one leg to stand on. TIA.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jeff, what do you think about the Over 40 on PHI / SEA?? I know there's talk of freezing rain in PHI, but the Hawks offense has been held to less than 20 pts only 2 out of 11 games this season (with and without Alexander and Hackett). The Eagles shoudn't have a problem topping 20+ pts on their own at home.
Tough one with the weather issues. I don't like it much.
 
Not sure if you realize this at all, but most books in Vegas have Philly at -3(-125) meaning you have to put up $125 just to win $100, although some have it at -120. Naturally if you're just counting your record and not calculating the juice(which is usually just -110) then taking all of the games which are greater than -110 will make you look good in the long run probably.
Not sure if you realize this at all, but if you had actually listened to me the first time you posted in one of my pick threads, you would have hit the Stone Cold :football: of the Year and you wouldn't be sweating the -120 or -125 vig.As for your last statement, feel free to walk through my picks and see what the lines were at the time. Come back when you have at least one leg to stand on. TIA.
He be jellus is all...
 
Hey Jeff dont you think NO looks good at -3 with Garcia out? What about SD -4?
:confused: [Kramer]

Why don't you just TELL me what movie game you'd like to see?

[Kramer]

I picked New Orleans, but it isn't star-worthy. SD -4 against KC? Really? Rivers still plays for the Chargers, right?
:X I guess the plan is to grill you on games you don't have a strong opinion on, then get mad when you are wrong.

 
Not sure if you realize this at all, but most books in Vegas have Philly at -3(-125) meaning you have to put up $125 just to win $100, although some have it at -120. Naturally if you're just counting your record and not calculating the juice(which is usually just -110) then taking all of the games which are greater than -110 will make you look good in the long run probably.
Not sure if you realize this at all, but if you had actually listened to me the first time you posted in one of my pick threads, you would have hit the Stone Cold :popcorn: of the Year and you wouldn't be sweating the -120 or -125 vig.As for your last statement, feel free to walk through my picks and see what the lines were at the time. Come back when you have at least one leg to stand on. TIA.
This may be the most embarrassing post by a paid staff member I've seen...and I've read a lot of Marc Levin in the FFA. I figured you were way better then this.The arrogance in the shark pool is astounding.

 
Not sure if you realize this at all, but most books in Vegas have Philly at -3(-125) meaning you have to put up $125 just to win $100, although some have it at -120. Naturally if you're just counting your record and not calculating the juice(which is usually just -110) then taking all of the games which are greater than -110 will make you look good in the long run probably.
Not sure if you realize this at all, but if you had actually listened to me the first time you posted in one of my pick threads, you would have hit the Stone Cold :bye: of the Year and you wouldn't be sweating the -120 or -125 vig.As for your last statement, feel free to walk through my picks and see what the lines were at the time. Come back when you have at least one leg to stand on. TIA.
This may be the most embarrassing post by a paid staff member I've seen...and I've read a lot of Marc Levin in the FFA. I figured you were way better then this.The arrogance in the shark pool is astounding.
:popcorn:
 
Not sure if you realize this at all, but most books in Vegas have Philly at -3(-125) meaning you have to put up $125 just to win $100, although some have it at -120. Naturally if you're just counting your record and not calculating the juice(which is usually just -110) then taking all of the games which are greater than -110 will make you look good in the long run probably.
Not sure if you realize this at all, but if you had actually listened to me the first time you posted in one of my pick threads, you would have hit the Stone Cold :rant: of the Year and you wouldn't be sweating the -120 or -125 vig.As for your last statement, feel free to walk through my picks and see what the lines were at the time. Come back when you have at least one leg to stand on. TIA.
This may be the most embarrassing post by a paid staff member I've seen...and I've read a lot of Marc Levin in the FFA. I figured you were way better then this.The arrogance in the shark pool is astounding.
:popcorn: hey jeff, turn the tool factor down a couple notches...

tia

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top