What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty QB Rankings- QB3 (1 Viewer)

Who would you rank as the #3 dynasty QB?

  • Ben Roethlisberger (3-2-1982)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tony Romo (4-21-1980)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Carson Palmer (12-27-1979)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Drew Brees (1-15-1979)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Drew Brees.

Romo has folded both times during the FF playoffs.

I'm not worried if my QB will win the game for me, I just want to make sure he doesn't lose it. Romo has put up an inordinate # of stinkers in December these last 2 seasons.

Matt Hasselbeck, if he can get a stud #1 WR, will also make a great #3 for a few more years, especially since Holmgren recognized that they can no longer be a running-oriented offense and still be successful.

TDs in 15 of 16 games in 2007, multiple TDs in 10 of them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not getting why more people aren't picking Drew Brees

He has the most pass-oriented offense, the best young receiver in Colston, enough of a running game and screen game to keep teams from cheating deep and a bad enough defense to guarantee he'll throw into the 4th quarter every single game

What's not to like? :rolleyes:

 
Wow!!! Palmer ahead of Brees.............that's just wrong. Ocho is overrated, Housh is getting up there.

Colston, Bush, McCallisteer, Johnson, and whatever WRs >>>>>>>>>>> Ocho, Housh, Henry, Rudi

 
Wow!!! Palmer ahead of Brees.............that's just wrong. Ocho is overrated, Housh is getting up there. Colston, Bush, McCallisteer, Johnson, and whatever WRs >>>>>>>>>>> Ocho, Housh, Henry, Rudi
:thumbdown: Ocho is overrated, and Housh is old, but you list Johnson as a positive for the Saints? By the way, if anyone of these players is overrated, i would say Bush is the obvious answer.No way are the Saints WR's better than the Bengals.
 
Burning Sensation said:
SproutDaddy said:
Wow!!! Palmer ahead of Brees.............that's just wrong. Ocho is overrated, Housh is getting up there. Colston, Bush, McCallisteer, Johnson, and whatever WRs >>>>>>>>>>> Ocho, Housh, Henry, Rudi
;) Ocho is overrated, and Housh is old, but you list Johnson as a positive for the Saints? By the way, if anyone of these players is overrated, i would say Bush is the obvious answer.No way are the Saints WR's better than the Bengals.
...and yet Brees has outproduced Palmer over the past couple of years. Doesn't that push more towards Brees being the better answer here? Its likely that NO re-tools their WRs a bit in the offseason, and if they can give Drew a better second wideout than Henderson/Patten/Copper/insert-scrub-of-choice then he just looks more appealing.Ludicrous passing attempts for Brees this year notwithstanding, I believe he'll gets back to his ~8 YPA with a (hopefully) re-established running game.
Code:
Att	Cmp	CmpPct	Yd	YAtt	Lg	TD	Int	RatePalmer:575	373	64.9	4131	7.2	70	26	20	86.7520	324	62.3	4035	7.8	74	28	13	93.9Brees:655	443	67.6	4428	6.8	58	28	18	89.4554	356	64.3	4418	8.0	86	26	11	96.2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Burning Sensation said:
SproutDaddy said:
Wow!!! Palmer ahead of Brees.............that's just wrong. Ocho is overrated, Housh is getting up there.

Colston, Bush, McCallisteer, Johnson, and whatever WRs >>>>>>>>>>> Ocho, Housh, Henry, Rudi
:shrug: Ocho is overrated, and Housh is old, but you list Johnson as a positive for the Saints? By the way, if anyone of these players is overrated, i would say Bush is the obvious answer.

No way are the Saints WR's better than the Bengals.
...and yet Brees has outproduced Palmer over the past couple of years. Doesn't that push more towards Brees being the better answer here? Its likely that NO re-tools their WRs a bit in the offseason, and if they can give Drew a better second wideout than Henderson/Patten/Copper/insert-scrub-of-choice then he just looks more appealing.Ludicrous passing attempts for Brees this year notwithstanding, I believe he'll gets back to his ~8 YPA with a (hopefully) re-established running game.

Code:
Not sure i said he wasnt, i just pointed out that the previous poster was making laughable comparisons.For the record i voted Roethlisberger, he has done the most, with the least, and i think things only get better for him next year.
 
Does Chad Johnson lead the NFL in receiving yards over the past 5 years? If not, he must be close.

Chad Johnson is not overrated.

 
Does Chad Johnson lead the NFL in receiving yards over the past 5 years? If not, he must be close.Chad Johnson is not overrated.
This past year was the first time in the last five years he did not lead the AFC in receiving yards, he finished 2nd behind Wayne. Yeah, i would say he is not really overrated.
 
Burning Sensation said:
SproutDaddy said:
Wow!!! Palmer ahead of Brees.............that's just wrong. Ocho is overrated, Housh is getting up there. Colston, Bush, McCallisteer, Johnson, and whatever WRs >>>>>>>>>>> Ocho, Housh, Henry, Rudi
:thumbup: Ocho is overrated, and Housh is old, but you list Johnson as a positive for the Saints? By the way, if anyone of these players is overrated, i would say Bush is the obvious answer.No way are the Saints WR's better than the Bengals.
...and yet Brees has outproduced Palmer over the past couple of years. Doesn't that push more towards Brees being the better answer here? Its likely that NO re-tools their WRs a bit in the offseason, and if they can give Drew a better second wideout than Henderson/Patten/Copper/insert-scrub-of-choice then he just looks more appealing.
Meachem? Give the guy a chance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Burning Sensation said:
SproutDaddy said:
Wow!!! Palmer ahead of Brees.............that's just wrong. Ocho is overrated, Housh is getting up there. Colston, Bush, McCallisteer, Johnson, and whatever WRs >>>>>>>>>>> Ocho, Housh, Henry, Rudi
:thumbup: Ocho is overrated, and Housh is old, but you list Johnson as a positive for the Saints? By the way, if anyone of these players is overrated, i would say Bush is the obvious answer.No way are the Saints WR's better than the Bengals.
...and yet Brees has outproduced Palmer over the past couple of years. Doesn't that push more towards Brees being the better answer here? Its likely that NO re-tools their WRs a bit in the offseason, and if they can give Drew a better second wideout than Henderson/Patten/Copper/insert-scrub-of-choice then he just looks more appealing.
Meachem? Give the guy a chance
:bow: You should have taken Bowe.
 
Burning Sensation said:
SproutDaddy said:
Wow!!! Palmer ahead of Brees.............that's just wrong. Ocho is overrated, Housh is getting up there. Colston, Bush, McCallisteer, Johnson, and whatever WRs >>>>>>>>>>> Ocho, Housh, Henry, Rudi
:goodposting: Ocho is overrated, and Housh is old, but you list Johnson as a positive for the Saints? By the way, if anyone of these players is overrated, i would say Bush is the obvious answer.No way are the Saints WR's better than the Bengals.
...and yet Brees has outproduced Palmer over the past couple of years. Doesn't that push more towards Brees being the better answer here? Its likely that NO re-tools their WRs a bit in the offseason, and if they can give Drew a better second wideout than Henderson/Patten/Copper/insert-scrub-of-choice then he just looks more appealing.
Meachem? Give the guy a chance
He will ( fingers-crossed ) be one of the "better options".
 
:lmao: You should have taken Bowe.
Bowe went 4 picks earlier, and we should have taken Poz.
:lmao: Olsen would have been my second choice.

Seriously, I didn't mean to get into a Chad Johnson bashing, but after owning him and Bush in a dynasty I can honestly say that Bush is more reliable than him. I traded Chad last year after owning him for two. He is very inconsistent. He has three or four games which inflate his stats to a high degree. I still think Brees in Payton's offense will outproduce Palmer. Over the next five years.

 
:) You should have taken Bowe.
Bowe went 4 picks earlier, and we should have taken Poz.
:bag: Olsen would have been my second choice.

Seriously, I didn't mean to get into a Chad Johnson bashing, but after owning him and Bush in a dynasty I can honestly say that Bush is more reliable than him. I traded Chad last year after owning him for two. He is very inconsistent. He has three or four games which inflate his stats to a high degree. I still think Brees in Payton's offense will outproduce Palmer. Over the next five years.
I don't disagree, but even when ocho isn't putting up stats, he's affecting the game and helping Palmer.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top