Great logic. I commend you on rating someone who hasn't played a snap.BUST
Bright future. Those giving up on Meachem are making a big mistake.We'll talk in 3 years, huh?BUST
You're kidding right? Devery Henderson is backup material, nothing more. He won't stunt anybody's growth. And he signed a 1 year deal for just 2 mil.well I look for Meacham growth to be stunted even further cuz they just resigned devery.Meach is the wr3, only if they dont bring patten in
and whats meacham done? 0you think they brought him back for giggles?I am not talking meachams long term value either, more short term. You dynasty players will have to wait awhile long to get real production out of himYou're kidding right? Devery Henderson is backup material, nothing more. He won't stunt anybody's growth.well I look for Meacham growth to be stunted even further cuz they just resigned devery.Meach is the wr3, only if they dont bring patten in
You guys are maddening. Unreal simplistic thinking. I give up.and whats meacham done? 0
so what your saying meacham is like a lock for even 800 yds and 4tds this season?You guys are maddening. Unreal simplistic thinking. I give up.and whats meacham done? 0
You guys are maddening. Unreal simplistic thinking. I give up.and whats meacham done? 0
I'm saying read more and spend less time worrying about past stats. I'm outta here. Time a to watch a movie.so what your saying meacham is like a lock for even 800 yds and 4tds this season?You guys are maddening. Unreal simplistic thinking. I give up.and whats meacham done? 0
hey Spud, don't let them get to you. I think Meachem is a great buy low. How can he not have better situation than 90% of the other young wrs. Meachem does have risk, but any buyer knows that. However, the former Vol does have a lot of upside in the Saint offense.You guys are maddening. Unreal simplistic thinking. I give up.and whats meacham done? 0
You know, something called, I don't know, depth? Because teams need more than 2 WR's? Just because they resigned Devery doesn't mean he's going to be the #2 WR. As a Saints fan, I've watched plenty of Devery and he just isn't reliable enough to be a #2 WR for the Saints. He had the job in 2007 and lost it midseason to Lance Moore and Patten. Now, I don't know what will happen with Meachem, but as said above, it won't be Devery Henderson that will be holding him off and keep him from realizing his potential. In the short-term, it could be Moore (who I like a lot, personally) or someone not yet on the roster or Meachem himself (I'm still not sold), but Devery is a #3 WR, at best.As far as Meachem's short-term value, I haven't seen any indication either way as to whether or not he will get a chance to start or not so I think it's a little too early to say. But, if you are going to buy on him, now's the time. It's a little too late to jump on the wagon once he's already named the #2 if it does happen.and whats meacham done? 0you think they brought him back for giggles?You're kidding right? Devery Henderson is backup material, nothing more. He won't stunt anybody's growth.well I look for Meacham growth to be stunted even further cuz they just resigned devery.
Meach is the wr3, only if they dont bring patten in
I am not talking meachams long term value either, more short term. You dynasty players will have to wait awhile long to get real production out of him
The dude is righ,t a Bust. Mech was way, way overated coming out of college. He's got a whole lot of Chicken Bleep in him and real poor hands. The Saints have made some great decisions the last two years, Reggie Bust and Mech were not two of them.Great logic. I commend you on rating someone who hasn't played a snap.BUST
I would actually put out a counter argument that the Saints need a consistent option for WR2. They played it by committee last year with Moore and Henderson and Copper, and it really didn't work out. Colston is the lynchpin and they want a better guy to start opposite of him.Meachem will have a full offseason to work with Brees and the coaches. Often they don't even get to their team's first OTA because of collegiate commitments. Meachem could be a bust, certainly - but to write him off now is foolish. I'd buy him low from an owner who is ready to give up right now and take my chances rather than picking up a vet has-been off the waiver wire.He will be competing for a starting position, but he has to beat out quite a few capable players - Henderson, Patten, Lance Moore
and to my point. Him getting on the field is gonna be tough enough this season.
LOL at read more thanks CP.
I'm not sure we're talking about the same guy here. 'Meach' was a beast and showed plenty of heart (not to mention skill)...your 'Mech' is full of Chicken Bleep and has poor hands. No correlation. As mentioned, counting out Meachem already would be a mistake.The dude is righ,t a Bust. Mech was way, way overated coming out of college. He's got a whole lot of Chicken Bleep in him and real poor hands. The Saints have made some great decisions the last two years, Reggie Bust and Mech were not two of them.Great logic. I commend you on rating someone who hasn't played a snap.BUST
I'm confused. Did he come to camp overweight and unable to learn the plays or does he ahave a great work ethic? These seem mutually exclusive.His biggest positive is that he apparently has a great work ethic. I'm not sure if he can be had for cheap, he's still a 1st rounder on an explosive offense. In a dynasty I was offered Meachem and a pick upgrade(early 2nd to late 1st) for Cotchery.
I am surprised at how fast some people give up on guys like this, and throw away first round WR picks if they don't pull a Moss/Bowe right out of the gate. Yes, I would have liked to have seen *some* playing time, but if I spent a first rounder on Meachem, you bet I'd keep him another year. Because you aren't getting that pick value back - one year later, nobody will give you a 1 for Meachem. I don't have Meachem, but I was a Jason Hill fan, and drafted him on most of my teams. He'll hang around my roster for another year.I'm not sure we're talking about the same guy here. 'Meach' was a beast and showed plenty of heart (not to mention skill)...your 'Mech' is full of Chicken Bleep and has poor hands. No correlation. As mentioned, counting out Meachem already would be a mistake.
I dont think he's quite that worthless. I think he's worth about the 30th pick in this years rookie ff draft.Bright future. Those giving up on Meachem are making a big mistake.We'll talk in 3 years, huh?BUST
Dare I ask how you managed to get six of the top rookies from last year's class in your 12 team dynasty league?Meachem is floating around in my 12 man dynasty league free agent pool right now.
His leaguemates suck? But most likely his team even sucked worse than them? I dunno. The only other explantion is its a start up and he went with youth! At least I hope so. On the bright side his team looks strong for 2009Dare I ask how you managed to get six of the top rookies from last year's class in your 12 team dynasty league?Meachem is floating around in my 12 man dynasty league free agent pool right now.
thats not a huge surprise with your small lineup and roster. I'm guessing there are even better players floating out there. Nice group of WR you have, surprised you don't trade up at QB.Meachem is floating around in my 12 man dynasty league free agent pool right now.
I wish I would have kept track of the laundry list of trades I made.Dare I ask how you managed to get six of the top rookies from last year's class in your 12 team dynasty league?Meachem is floating around in my 12 man dynasty league free agent pool right now.
Nice. League is full of competitors. My team is young by design. I am addicted to youth, sometimes this does not bode well for me.His leaguemates suck? But most likely his team even sucked worse than them? I dunno. The only other explantion is its a start up and he went with youth! At least I hope so. On the bright side his team looks strong for 2009Dare I ask how you managed to get six of the top rookies from last year's class in your 12 team dynasty league?Meachem is floating around in my 12 man dynasty league free agent pool right now.
I love Cutler, but am trying to add a QB. Offer out there right now is: J Russ/S Holmes for D Brees. We shall see if he bites.thats not a huge surprise with your small lineup and roster. I'm guessing there are even better players floating out there. Nice group of WR you have, surprised you don't trade up at QB.Meachem is floating around in my 12 man dynasty league free agent pool right now.
Was he truly healthy? I thought he had some injury issues in preseason that carried into the regular season.I'm not surprised that he had a bad rookie year, but he didn't catch a single pass!
That doesn't mean he won't ultimately pan out, but I can't remember a healthy first round WR who didn't catch even a single pass in his rookie year. It's very odd that they didn't give him any opportunities.
As a Brees owner I'd pass on that, but Cutler/Holmes would make me think twice, depending on who else I had at WR and QB.King of the Jungle said:I love Cutler, but am trying to add a QB. Offer out there right now is: J Russ/S Holmes for D Brees. We shall see if he bites.King of the Wolfies said:thats not a huge surprise with your small lineup and roster. I'm guessing there are even better players floating out there. Nice group of WR you have, surprised you don't trade up at QB.King of the Jungle said:Meachem is floating around in my 12 man dynasty league free agent pool right now.
I understand, I would too. Not trying to enter an ###. Forum. I am high on Cutler and would like to pair him up with another capable w/o trading him.As a Brees owner I'd pass on that, but Cutler/Holmes would make me think twice, depending on who else I had at WR and QB.King of the Jungle said:I love Cutler, but am trying to add a QB. Offer out there right now is: J Russ/S Holmes for D Brees. We shall see if he bites.King of the Wolfies said:thats not a huge surprise with your small lineup and roster. I'm guessing there are even better players floating out there. Nice group of WR you have, surprised you don't trade up at QB.King of the Jungle said:Meachem is floating around in my 12 man dynasty league free agent pool right now.
He re-injured his knee in camp and had to have arthroscopic surgery to start the season. He was healthy by mid-season but it was too late in Payton's mind. I seriously think Payton just didn't like how unprepared he was and maybe Meachem acted like he was going to be handed a starting job by virtue of being a 1st round pick.As a Brees owner I'd pass on that, but Cutler/Holmes would make me think twice, depending on who else I had at WR and QB.King of the Jungle said:I love Cutler, but am trying to add a QB. Offer out there right now is: J Russ/S Holmes for D Brees. We shall see if he bites.King of the Wolfies said:thats not a huge surprise with your small lineup and roster. I'm guessing there are even better players floating out there. Nice group of WR you have, surprised you don't trade up at QB.King of the Jungle said:Meachem is floating around in my 12 man dynasty league free agent pool right now.
Rookie first round picks since 1970 with fewer than five receptions:EBF said:I'm not surprised that he had a bad rookie year, but he didn't catch a single pass!That doesn't mean he won't ultimately pan out, but I can't remember a healthy first round WR who didn't catch even a single pass in his rookie year. It's very odd that they didn't give him any opportunities.
Name Rec Year college PickClyde Duncan 0 1984 tennessee 17Randal Hill 0 1991 miami(fl) 23Johnny Rodgers 0 1973 nebraska 25Randy Burke 0 1977 kentucky 26Yatil Green 0 1997 miami(fl) 15Robert Meachem 0 2007 tennessee 27Terry Beasley 1 1972 auburn 19Willis Adams 1 1979 houston 20Walker Gillette 2 1970 richmond 15Mark Ingram 2 1987 michiganst 28Ike Hilliard 2 1997 florida 7Santana Moss 2 2001 miami(fl) 16Frank Lewis 3 1971 gramblingst 8Steve Holden 3 1973 arizonast 16Desmond Howard 3 1992 michigan 4Johnnie Morton 3 1994 usc 21Thomas Lewis 4 1994 indiana 24Marcus Nash 4 1998 tennessee 30
ouchRookie first round picks since 1970 with fewer than five receptions:EBF said:I'm not surprised that he had a bad rookie year, but he didn't catch a single pass!That doesn't mean he won't ultimately pan out, but I can't remember a healthy first round WR who didn't catch even a single pass in his rookie year. It's very odd that they didn't give him any opportunities.Code:Name Rec Year college PickClyde Duncan 0 1984 tennessee 17Randal Hill 0 1991 miami(fl) 23Johnny Rodgers 0 1973 nebraska 25Randy Burke 0 1977 kentucky 26Yatil Green 0 1997 miami(fl) 15Robert Meachem 0 2007 tennessee 27Terry Beasley 1 1972 auburn 19Willis Adams 1 1979 houston 20Walker Gillette 2 1970 richmond 15Mark Ingram 2 1987 michiganst 28Ike Hilliard 2 1997 florida 7Santana Moss 2 2001 miami(fl) 16Frank Lewis 3 1971 gramblingst 8Steve Holden 3 1973 arizonast 16Desmond Howard 3 1992 michigan 4Johnnie Morton 3 1994 usc 21Thomas Lewis 4 1994 indiana 24Marcus Nash 4 1998 tennessee 30
So can we conclude that Meachem is a once in a decade talent?Rookie first round picks since 1970 with fewer than five receptions:EBF said:I'm not surprised that he had a bad rookie year, but he didn't catch a single pass!That doesn't mean he won't ultimately pan out, but I can't remember a healthy first round WR who didn't catch even a single pass in his rookie year. It's very odd that they didn't give him any opportunities.Code:Name Rec Year college PickClyde Duncan 0 1984 tennessee 17Randal Hill 0 1991 miami(fl) 23Johnny Rodgers 0 1973 nebraska 25Randy Burke 0 1977 kentucky 26Yatil Green 0 1997 miami(fl) 15Robert Meachem 0 2007 tennessee 27Terry Beasley 1 1972 auburn 19Willis Adams 1 1979 houston 20Walker Gillette 2 1970 richmond 15Mark Ingram 2 1987 michiganst 28Ike Hilliard 2 1997 florida 7Santana Moss 2 2001 miami(fl) 16Frank Lewis 3 1971 gramblingst 8Steve Holden 3 1973 arizonast 16Desmond Howard 3 1992 michigan 4Johnnie Morton 3 1994 usc 21Thomas Lewis 4 1994 indiana 24Marcus Nash 4 1998 tennessee 30
Unlike other situations, I don't believe Meachem was held out for talent reasons, but rather to teach him a lesson. It doesn't inspire confidence that the coach would have to resort to such measures with a top pick, but I think this is a pretty unique situation. Santana Moss wasn't exactly behind a stud in Wayne Chrebet, yet he still only caught 2 passes and he turned out alright.In all seriousness, that's not exactly great company. And that's the big thing that worries me about Meachem. I know it's pretty common for good WRs to have quiet rookie years, but zero catches? Wow. It's not like Lance Moore and Devery Henderson are Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce. I'm surprised the staff didn't give him a chance to play ahead of those guys towards the end of the season.
Moss was injured that yr. I think he hurt his knee is camo and than pulled his hammy later that season.Unlike other situations, I don't believe Meachem was held out for talent reasons, but rather to teach him a lesson. It doesn't inspire confidence that the coach would have to resort to such measures with a top pick, but I think this is a pretty unique situation. Santana Moss wasn't exactly behind a stud in Wayne Chrebet, yet he still only caught 2 passes and he turned out alright.In all seriousness, that's not exactly great company. And that's the big thing that worries me about Meachem. I know it's pretty common for good WRs to have quiet rookie years, but zero catches? Wow. It's not like Lance Moore and Devery Henderson are Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce. I'm surprised the staff didn't give him a chance to play ahead of those guys towards the end of the season.
Moss was injured that yr. I think he hurt his knee is camo and than pulled his hammy later that season.Unlike other situations, I don't believe Meachem was held out for talent reasons, but rather to teach him a lesson. It doesn't inspire confidence that the coach would have to resort to such measures with a top pick, but I think this is a pretty unique situation. Santana Moss wasn't exactly behind a stud in Wayne Chrebet, yet he still only caught 2 passes and he turned out alright.In all seriousness, that's not exactly great company. And that's the big thing that worries me about Meachem. I know it's pretty common for good WRs to have quiet rookie years, but zero catches? Wow. It's not like Lance Moore and Devery Henderson are Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce. I'm surprised the staff didn't give him a chance to play ahead of those guys towards the end of the season.
Sounds like Meachem to me - minus the overweight/learning the playbook issues.2001: Moss was inactive for 11 games in 2001 due to torn cartilage in his left knee, an injury suffered early in training camp. He came back after surgery to play in five games and finished 2001 with two receptions for 40 yards and six punt returns for 82 yards.
No that was last year- hey, wait!Moss was injured that yr. I think he hurt his knee is camo and than pulled his hammy later that season.Unlike other situations, I don't believe Meachem was held out for talent reasons, but rather to teach him a lesson. It doesn't inspire confidence that the coach would have to resort to such measures with a top pick, but I think this is a pretty unique situation. Santana Moss wasn't exactly behind a stud in Wayne Chrebet, yet he still only caught 2 passes and he turned out alright.In all seriousness, that's not exactly great company. And that's the big thing that worries me about Meachem. I know it's pretty common for good WRs to have quiet rookie years, but zero catches? Wow. It's not like Lance Moore and Devery Henderson are Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce. I'm surprised the staff didn't give him a chance to play ahead of those guys towards the end of the season.
Rookie first round picks since 1970 with fewer than five receptions:EBF said:I'm not surprised that he had a bad rookie year, but he didn't catch a single pass!That doesn't mean he won't ultimately pan out, but I can't remember a healthy first round WR who didn't catch even a single pass in his rookie year. It's very odd that they didn't give him any opportunities.Frank Lewis was a very good WR that played behind two HOF most of his career, and then finally made the Pro Bowl at age 34. Santana Moss has been very good when healthy, Johnnie Morton was pretty good, and Ike Hilliard, Mark Ingram and Randall Hill weren't bad, either. Outside of that, though,Code:Name Rec Year college PickClyde Duncan 0 1984 tennessee 17Randal Hill 0 1991 miami(fl) 23Johnny Rodgers 0 1973 nebraska 25Randy Burke 0 1977 kentucky 26Yatil Green 0 1997 miami(fl) 15Robert Meachem 0 2007 tennessee 27Terry Beasley 1 1972 auburn 19Willis Adams 1 1979 houston 20Walker Gillette 2 1970 richmond 15Mark Ingram 2 1987 michiganst 28Ike Hilliard 2 1997 florida 7Santana Moss 2 2001 miami(fl) 16Frank Lewis 3 1971 gramblingst 8Steve Holden 3 1973 arizonast 16Desmond Howard 3 1992 michigan 4Johnnie Morton 3 1994 usc 21Thomas Lewis 4 1994 indiana 24Marcus Nash 4 1998 tennessee 30
uke:.
Yeah, I mean who's that Desmond Howard guy, anyway?Rookie first round picks since 1970 with fewer than five receptions:EBF said:I'm not surprised that he had a bad rookie year, but he didn't catch a single pass!That doesn't mean he won't ultimately pan out, but I can't remember a healthy first round WR who didn't catch even a single pass in his rookie year. It's very odd that they didn't give him any opportunities.Frank Lewis was a very good WR that played behind two HOF most of his career, and then finally made the Pro Bowl at age 34. Santana Moss has been very good when healthy, Johnnie Morton was pretty good, and Ike Hilliard, Mark Ingram and Randall Hill weren't bad, either. Outside of that, though,Code:Name Rec Year college PickClyde Duncan 0 1984 tennessee 17Randal Hill 0 1991 miami(fl) 23Johnny Rodgers 0 1973 nebraska 25Randy Burke 0 1977 kentucky 26Yatil Green 0 1997 miami(fl) 15Robert Meachem 0 2007 tennessee 27Terry Beasley 1 1972 auburn 19Willis Adams 1 1979 houston 20Walker Gillette 2 1970 richmond 15Mark Ingram 2 1987 michiganst 28Ike Hilliard 2 1997 florida 7Santana Moss 2 2001 miami(fl) 16Frank Lewis 3 1971 gramblingst 8Steve Holden 3 1973 arizonast 16Desmond Howard 3 1992 michigan 4Johnnie Morton 3 1994 usc 21Thomas Lewis 4 1994 indiana 24Marcus Nash 4 1998 tennessee 30
uke:.
A huge bust. He has <1600 career receiving yards, seven career TDs, and topped 300 receiving yards once in his career.Yeah, I mean who's that Desmond Howard guy, anyway?Rookie first round picks since 1970 with fewer than five receptions:EBF said:I'm not surprised that he had a bad rookie year, but he didn't catch a single pass!That doesn't mean he won't ultimately pan out, but I can't remember a healthy first round WR who didn't catch even a single pass in his rookie year. It's very odd that they didn't give him any opportunities.Frank Lewis was a very good WR that played behind two HOF most of his career, and then finally made the Pro Bowl at age 34. Santana Moss has been very good when healthy, Johnnie Morton was pretty good, and Ike Hilliard, Mark Ingram and Randall Hill weren't bad, either. Outside of that, though,Code:Name Rec Year college PickClyde Duncan 0 1984 tennessee 17Randal Hill 0 1991 miami(fl) 23Johnny Rodgers 0 1973 nebraska 25Randy Burke 0 1977 kentucky 26Yatil Green 0 1997 miami(fl) 15Robert Meachem 0 2007 tennessee 27Terry Beasley 1 1972 auburn 19Willis Adams 1 1979 houston 20Walker Gillette 2 1970 richmond 15Mark Ingram 2 1987 michiganst 28Ike Hilliard 2 1997 florida 7Santana Moss 2 2001 miami(fl) 16Frank Lewis 3 1971 gramblingst 8Steve Holden 3 1973 arizonast 16Desmond Howard 3 1992 michigan 4Johnnie Morton 3 1994 usc 21Thomas Lewis 4 1994 indiana 24Marcus Nash 4 1998 tennessee 30
uke:.
And a Pro Bowler.And only Super Bowl MVP once. Seriously, total loser. In fact, just to showcase that, you should totally go change the title on my thread.A huge bust. He has <1600 career receiving yards, seven career TDs, and topped 300 receiving yards once in his career.Yeah, I mean who's that Desmond Howard guy, anyway?Rookie first round picks since 1970 with fewer than five receptions:EBF said:I'm not surprised that he had a bad rookie year, but he didn't catch a single pass!That doesn't mean he won't ultimately pan out, but I can't remember a healthy first round WR who didn't catch even a single pass in his rookie year. It's very odd that they didn't give him any opportunities.Frank Lewis was a very good WR that played behind two HOF most of his career, and then finally made the Pro Bowl at age 34. Santana Moss has been very good when healthy, Johnnie Morton was pretty good, and Ike Hilliard, Mark Ingram and Randall Hill weren't bad, either. Outside of that, though,Code:Name Rec Year college PickClyde Duncan 0 1984 tennessee 17Randal Hill 0 1991 miami(fl) 23Johnny Rodgers 0 1973 nebraska 25Randy Burke 0 1977 kentucky 26Yatil Green 0 1997 miami(fl) 15Robert Meachem 0 2007 tennessee 27Terry Beasley 1 1972 auburn 19Willis Adams 1 1979 houston 20Walker Gillette 2 1970 richmond 15Mark Ingram 2 1987 michiganst 28Ike Hilliard 2 1997 florida 7Santana Moss 2 2001 miami(fl) 16Frank Lewis 3 1971 gramblingst 8Steve Holden 3 1973 arizonast 16Desmond Howard 3 1992 michigan 4Johnnie Morton 3 1994 usc 21Thomas Lewis 4 1994 indiana 24Marcus Nash 4 1998 tennessee 30
uke:.
Desmond Howard was a bad wide receiver for a first round pick, and a bust. He also had no fantasy value. If Robert Meacham approaches that career, he's a pretty bad buy low candidate.Happy now?And a Pro Bowler.And only Super Bowl MVP once. Seriously, total loser. In fact, just to showcase that, you should totally go change the title on my thread.A huge bust. He has <1600 career receiving yards, seven career TDs, and topped 300 receiving yards once in his career.Yeah, I mean who's that Desmond Howard guy, anyway?Rookie first round picks since 1970 with fewer than five receptions:EBF said:I'm not surprised that he had a bad rookie year, but he didn't catch a single pass!That doesn't mean he won't ultimately pan out, but I can't remember a healthy first round WR who didn't catch even a single pass in his rookie year. It's very odd that they didn't give him any opportunities.Frank Lewis was a very good WR that played behind two HOF most of his career, and then finally made the Pro Bowl at age 34. Santana Moss has been very good when healthy, Johnnie Morton was pretty good, and Ike Hilliard, Mark Ingram and Randall Hill weren't bad, either. Outside of that, though,Code:Name Rec Year college PickClyde Duncan 0 1984 tennessee 17Randal Hill 0 1991 miami(fl) 23Johnny Rodgers 0 1973 nebraska 25Randy Burke 0 1977 kentucky 26Yatil Green 0 1997 miami(fl) 15Robert Meachem 0 2007 tennessee 27Terry Beasley 1 1972 auburn 19Willis Adams 1 1979 houston 20Walker Gillette 2 1970 richmond 15Mark Ingram 2 1987 michiganst 28Ike Hilliard 2 1997 florida 7Santana Moss 2 2001 miami(fl) 16Frank Lewis 3 1971 gramblingst 8Steve Holden 3 1973 arizonast 16Desmond Howard 3 1992 michigan 4Johnnie Morton 3 1994 usc 21Thomas Lewis 4 1994 indiana 24Marcus Nash 4 1998 tennessee 30
uke:.
No. As a WR5 in my "including returns" league, he's a tremendous buy low candidate.Desmond Howard was a bad wide receiver for a first round pick, and a bust. He also had no fantasy value. If Robert Meacham approaches that career, he's a pretty bad buy low candidate.Happy now?