What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Michael Turner vs Marion Barber (1 Viewer)

?

  • Michael Turner

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Marion Barber

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Righetti

Footballguy
We did this poll last year in this thread with Burner Turner beating out MB3, I wonder what the votes are this time around.

Help settle this dispute with a certain famous wedding-wrecking FBG buddy of mine -- which running back would you rather have in dynasty, Marion Barber III or Michael "the Burner" Turner (and feel free to explain why)?

To me it's such an easy call it's silly, but this GB of mine thinks the results will be quite different.

TIA
 
MB3 has proven he has a nose for the endzone , is good at catching the ball , and is in a much better offense.

Easy Call

 
to give some context

MB3

45 games

477 carries

2167 yards

4.54 ypc

29 TD's

85 receptions

593 yards

6.98 YPR

4 receiving TD's

6 lost fumbles

MBT

59 games

228 carries

1257 yards

5.51 YPC

6 TD's

11 receptions

71 yards

6.45 YPR

0 receiving TD's

2 fumbles lost

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Turner is the better back, but Barber is in a much better situation.
This is probably right. However, the rule in dynasty has always seemed to be pick the guy with the most talent because the cream will eventually rise to the top. I love both of these guys, but I'm a huge Turner believer.
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TD

MBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD

 
Turner is the better back, but Barber is in a much better situation.
This is probably right. However, the rule in dynasty has always seemed to be pick the guy with the most talent because the cream will eventually rise to the top. I love both of these guys, but I'm a huge Turner believer.
In most cases, you're right that talent trumps situation. However, given what these 2 have to offer and the fact that Turner just landed a starting job with a long-term contract and Barber may be doing the same, you can't ignore situations with these 2. Aside from the fact that I think the talent level is similar, if not favoring Barber, but the situation seems so overwhelming to me that it's easily Barber. No way I would draft Turner in a startup dynasty if Barber were on the board.
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TDMBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
I suspect a much higher percentage of MB3's touches were goal line carries. (Tomlinson got the GL carries in San Diego.)There's no question that MB3 is great around the goal line, though. He's one of the more determined runners in the league.
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TDMBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
Not a very useful statistic for comparing these two. Barber was THE goal line option in Dallas. Turner was a backup to one of the best TD runners all time in the league -- I'll bet that most of Turner's TDs were long runs he broke from outside the red zone.
 
MB34.54 ypcMBT5.51 YPC
Here's what I think is the most useful statistic for comparing these two runners. TD's and catches are situation- and use-dependent, and thus far in their careers they have been used in very different ways. However, if you give two guys handoffs a few hundred times and one comes out 1 YPC higher than the other, that may be saying something (or it may not be, but at least I think it's fairer ground for comparison).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Turner is the better back, but Barber is in a much better situation.
:yes: with the caveat "at this point" - we don't know how the Falcons will look come opening day, nor who will be the RBs in Dallas next season.If Dal drafts McFadden, MB#s value will take a nosedive.If ATL assembles a decent OL and has an OK QB, Turner will still be solid.RB is one of the easiest positions from which to produce at a high level despite surrounding talent, outside of OL.
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TDMBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
I suspect a much higher percentage of MB3's touches were goal line carries. (Tomlinson got the GL carries in San Diego.)There's no question that MB3 is great around the goal line, though. He's one of the more determined runners in the league.
It's difficult to judge Turner because he's had so few chances. He's only had 7 goal line attempts in his career, converting 2 TDs.Comparatively, Barber has 19 TDs in 48 goal line attempts (39.6% conversion rate).
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TDMBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
I suspect a much higher percentage of MB3's touches were goal line carries. (Tomlinson got the GL carries in San Diego.)There's no question that MB3 is great around the goal line, though. He's one of the more determined runners in the league.
If you do some research, I posted in another thread about these two, Turner actually has a higher TD/touch inside the 10... he's actually a better GL runner than MB3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
At this juncture, I don't see how one could justifiably pick Turner over Barber.

I like Turner, but he still has considerably higher bust potential as a starter than the more proven Barber. And the age factor is essentially a wash.

 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TD

MBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
I suspect a much higher percentage of MB3's touches were goal line carries. (Tomlinson got the GL carries in San Diego.)There's no question that MB3 is great around the goal line, though. He's one of the more determined runners in the league.
If you do some research, I posted in another thread about these two, Turner actually has a higher TD/touch inside the 10... he's actually a better GL runner than MB3
:lmao: I don't know what planet you're living on switz, but the numbers don't bear that out.

Barber has 24 TDs in 84 rushing attempts inside the 10-yard line (28.6%)

Turner has 3 TDs in 17 rushing attempts inside the 10-year line (17.6%)

Data Dominator Results

 
MB34.54 ypcMBT5.51 YPC
Here's what I think is the most useful statistic for comparing these two runners. TD's and catches are situation- and use-dependent, and thus far in their careers they have been used in very different ways. However, if you give two guys handoffs a few hundred times and one comes out 1 YPC higher than the other, that may be saying something (or it may not be, but at least I think it's fairer ground for comparison).
egh, i don't pay too much attention to the YPC of a true backup running back, it is impossible to decipher which kinds of situations he got into.. late in the game, big lead, big deficit, goal-line etc.
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TD

MBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
I suspect a much higher percentage of MB3's touches were goal line carries. (Tomlinson got the GL carries in San Diego.)There's no question that MB3 is great around the goal line, though. He's one of the more determined runners in the league.
If you do some research, I posted in another thread about these two, Turner actually has a higher TD/touch inside the 10... he's actually a better GL runner than MB3
:lmao: I don't know what planet you're living on switz, but the numbers don't bear that out.

Barber has 24 TDs in 84 rushing attempts inside the 10-yard line (28.6%)

Turner has 3 TDs in 17 rushing attempts inside the 10-year line (17.6%)

Data Dominator Results
I don't think there's any way you can conclude that Turner is a better runner than Barber in the red zone -- or vice versa. There's data that says that Barber is a good goal line runner. There's just no data on Turner yet. It's like comparing apples to imaginary fruits.
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TD

MBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
I suspect a much higher percentage of MB3's touches were goal line carries. (Tomlinson got the GL carries in San Diego.)There's no question that MB3 is great around the goal line, though. He's one of the more determined runners in the league.
If you do some research, I posted in another thread about these two, Turner actually has a higher TD/touch inside the 10... he's actually a better GL runner than MB3
:pickle: I don't know what planet you're living on switz, but the numbers don't bear that out.

Barber has 24 TDs in 84 rushing attempts inside the 10-yard line (28.6%)

Turner has 3 TDs in 17 rushing attempts inside the 10-year line (17.6%)

Data Dominator Results
:lmao: D'oh - got confused with another player being compared to Barber. You're right, Turner's TD numbers aren't even close... ugh, typing w/o thinking.
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TD

MBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
I suspect a much higher percentage of MB3's touches were goal line carries. (Tomlinson got the GL carries in San Diego.)There's no question that MB3 is great around the goal line, though. He's one of the more determined runners in the league.
If you do some research, I posted in another thread about these two, Turner actually has a higher TD/touch inside the 10... he's actually a better GL runner than MB3
:eek: I don't know what planet you're living on switz, but the numbers don't bear that out.

Barber has 24 TDs in 84 rushing attempts inside the 10-yard line (28.6%)

Turner has 3 TDs in 17 rushing attempts inside the 10-year line (17.6%)

Data Dominator Results
I don't think there's any way you can conclude that Turner is a better runner than Barber in the red zone -- or vice versa. There's data that says that Barber is a good goal line runner. There's just no data on Turner yet. It's like comparing apples to imaginary fruits.
I agree that 17 attempts in a career don't paint the picture. But FOR SURE you can't say he's better than Barber.
 
MB34.54 ypcMBT5.51 YPC
Here's what I think is the most useful statistic for comparing these two runners. TD's and catches are situation- and use-dependent, and thus far in their careers they have been used in very different ways. However, if you give two guys handoffs a few hundred times and one comes out 1 YPC higher than the other, that may be saying something (or it may not be, but at least I think it's fairer ground for comparison).
egh, i don't pay too much attention to the YPC of a true backup running back, it is impossible to decipher which kinds of situations he got into.. late in the game, big lead, big deficit, goal-line etc.
There's been a study on this -- take a look at some of Chase's recent threads, I believe he references it. Ultimately you can't draw the conclusion that a backup should have a higher YPC. In fact, I think the data suggested that more carries in a game tended to result in HIGHER YPC.Not sure why you wouldn't pay attention to a yards per carry stat for the one position in the game that carries the ball for yards. :eek:
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TD

MBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
I suspect a much higher percentage of MB3's touches were goal line carries. (Tomlinson got the GL carries in San Diego.)There's no question that MB3 is great around the goal line, though. He's one of the more determined runners in the league.
If you do some research, I posted in another thread about these two, Turner actually has a higher TD/touch inside the 10... he's actually a better GL runner than MB3
:eek: I don't know what planet you're living on switz, but the numbers don't bear that out.

Barber has 24 TDs in 84 rushing attempts inside the 10-yard line (28.6%)

Turner has 3 TDs in 17 rushing attempts inside the 10-year line (17.6%)

Data Dominator Results
I don't think there's any way you can conclude that Turner is a better runner than Barber in the red zone -- or vice versa. There's data that says that Barber is a good goal line runner. There's just no data on Turner yet. It's like comparing apples to imaginary fruits.
See above... it was a thread comparing Barber to a different RB... my mistake.
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TD

MBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
I suspect a much higher percentage of MB3's touches were goal line carries. (Tomlinson got the GL carries in San Diego.)There's no question that MB3 is great around the goal line, though. He's one of the more determined runners in the league.
If you do some research, I posted in another thread about these two, Turner actually has a higher TD/touch inside the 10... he's actually a better GL runner than MB3
:eek: I don't know what planet you're living on switz, but the numbers don't bear that out.

Barber has 24 TDs in 84 rushing attempts inside the 10-yard line (28.6%)

Turner has 3 TDs in 17 rushing attempts inside the 10-year line (17.6%)

Data Dominator Results
I don't think there's any way you can conclude that Turner is a better runner than Barber in the red zone -- or vice versa. There's data that says that Barber is a good goal line runner. There's just no data on Turner yet. It's like comparing apples to imaginary fruits.
I agree that 17 attempts in a career don't paint the picture. But FOR SURE you can't say he's better than Barber.
Agreed.
 
Barber has 33 TD's over 562 touches an average of 17.0 touches per TD

MBT has 6 TD's over 239 touches, an average of 39.8 touches per TD
I suspect a much higher percentage of MB3's touches were goal line carries. (Tomlinson got the GL carries in San Diego.)There's no question that MB3 is great around the goal line, though. He's one of the more determined runners in the league.
If you do some research, I posted in another thread about these two, Turner actually has a higher TD/touch inside the 10... he's actually a better GL runner than MB3
:eek: I don't know what planet you're living on switz, but the numbers don't bear that out.

Barber has 24 TDs in 84 rushing attempts inside the 10-yard line (28.6%)

Turner has 3 TDs in 17 rushing attempts inside the 10-year line (17.6%)

Data Dominator Results
:wall: D'oh - got confused with another player being compared to Barber. You're right, Turner's TD numbers aren't even close... ugh, typing w/o thinking.
:eek: I was going to say...you don't usually make proclamations that are that far off base :thumbup:
 
Just for kicks and grins, here are the top 30 RBs in terms of TD/touch (2002-2007)

Note: I used 20 attempts as the minimum cut off

Rank Player Name TDs Atts %Conv

1 Stacey Mack 13 30 43.33%

2 James Mungro 12 28 42.86%

3 Priest Holmes 53 125 42.40%

4 Jonathan Wells 11 27 40.74%

5 Samkon Gado 8 20 40.00%

6 Shaun Alexander 71 178 39.89%

7 Correll Buckhalter 10 26 38.46%

8 Cedric Benson 8 21 38.10%

9 Brandon Jacobs 20 53 37.74%

10 T.J. Duckett 27 72 37.50%

11 LaDainian Tomlinson 86 231 37.23%

12 Emmitt Smith 12 33 36.36%

13 Jerome Bettis 34 96 35.42%

14 Larry Johnson 39 111 35.14%

15 Corey Dillon 43 124 34.68%

16 Sammy Morris 10 29 34.48%

17 Ahman Green 32 93 34.41%

18 Marshall Faulk 23 67 34.33%

19 Kevan Barlow 23 68 33.82%

20 Mike Bell 8 24 33.33%

21 Domanick Williams 20 61 32.79%

22 Stephen Davis 26 81 32.10%

23 Garrison Hearst 12 38 31.58%

24 Marion Barber III 28 92 30.43%

25 Kenny Watson 10 33 30.30%

26 Zack Crockett 18 60 30.00%

27 Brian Westbrook 24 80 30.00%

28 Dorsey Levens 8 27 29.63%

29 Reggie Bush 12 41 29.27%

30 Rudi Johnson 39 136 28.68%

 
I think these poll numbers would be flipped around if MBIII is on atlanta and Turner is on dallas. That said I still went with turner, he's going to be the man in atlanta for the next few years.

 
:shock: I was going to say...you don't usually make proclamations that are that far off base :lmao:
Thanks, I think...FYI, to illustrate how far off the chart the Barber hype is right now, in the thread which I was thinking of, someone said that Barber was a top-5 dynasty back, and better than Joseph Addai in a dynasty league. :)

 
I think these poll numbers would be flipped around if MBIII is on atlanta and Turner is on dallas. That said I still went with turner, he's going to be the man in atlanta for the next few years.
You're exactly right. That's why it's impossible to ignore situation when comparing these 2. As pointed out above, the draft still has to occur for Dallas and Atlanta is so much of an unknown with all the turnover that's happened, but given the current information, it's easily Barber I think primarily due to situation.
 
:moneybag: I was going to say...you don't usually make proclamations that are that far off base :no:
Thanks, I think...FYI, to illustrate how far off the chart the Barber hype is right now, in the thread which I was thinking of, someone said that Barber was a top-5 dynasty back, and better than Joseph Addai in a dynasty league. :no:
he's ranked 6th in the average staff ranking. I don't see it personally....
 
This should be an easy vote. Not only is Barber in a better situation, he is most likely the better talent and far more proven. Oh as well as younger.

 
:shrug: I was going to say...you don't usually make proclamations that are that far off base :thumbup:
Thanks, I think...FYI, to illustrate how far off the chart the Barber hype is right now, in the thread which I was thinking of, someone said that Barber was a top-5 dynasty back, and better than Joseph Addai in a dynasty league. :no:
Here is a post I wrote on Barber back in January: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/?p=463For those that don't want to read the whole thing, I look at comparable historical players to MBIII, for example, here is table 2, a list of the most similar backs, who rushed for 200+ attempts for the first time in their careers at age 24, like MBIII:

player year sim score

=================================================

Greg Pruitt 1975 900

Neal Anderson 1988 882

Wilbert Montgomery 1978 881

Wendell Tyler 1979 873

Franco Harris 1974 844

Napoleon Kaufman 1997 844

Rudi Johnson 2003 840

Kevan Barlow 2003 825

Otis Armstrong 1974 821

Terry Allen 1992 820

Craig James 1985 801

Jamal Anderson 1996 801

Marion Butts 1990 800

=================================================
And further on . . .

13 of the 20 players in tables 1 & 2 would score 200 or more fantasy points at least once in the next three years, and Armstrong and Pruitt would have likely also reached that number with a 16 game schedule. Just over half (11/20) would accomplish that twice by age 27.
So, I suggested he should be in the discussion of the top 5, based on historic comparables. He plays on a top offense that will create red zone chances and first down opportunities. He has consistently had a good ypc. He catches the ball well. He blocks well. He scores TD's. Other backs who had similar production went on to top fantasy years over the next three seasons. The only missing piece to the puzzle is increasing his touches to closer to 300-350. We will know more coming out of the draft.I'm sitting on MBIII for $15 and Turner for $4 in a $100 auction, 12 team league right now. So if people want to talk up Turner, I'm cool with that too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This should be an easy vote. Not only is Barber in a better situation, he is most likely the better talent and far more proven. Oh as well as younger.
:shrug:Statements like that are what make a mess in these debates. What in the heck are you basing that on??Your other statements make sense, other than the "younger" thing, which really has no bearing here since Turner has got near zero mileage on him.
 
This should be an easy vote. Not only is Barber in a better situation, he is most likely the better talent and far more proven. Oh as well as younger.
:shrug:Statements like that are what make a mess in these debates. What in the heck are you basing that on??Your other statements make sense, other than the "younger" thing, which really has no bearing here since Turner has got near zero mileage on him.
Mostly likely meaning we don't really have a lot to evaluate Turner on. From what I've seen however, I would say that Barber is more talented. It is far from a certainty though.What is so difficult to understand about that. Sorry, but I'm not about to throw out the absolute statements many others seem to with such little information.
 
This should be an easy vote. Not only is Barber in a better situation, he is most likely the better talent and far more proven. Oh as well as younger.
Your other statements make sense, other than the "younger" thing, which really has no bearing here since Turner has got near zero mileage on him.
Age is more important than mileage. And since neither of them has a recent high workload history that would increase the injury concern, the fact that Barber is a year younger is one factor. Not a factor that should lead you to, say, choose a clearly inferior back who is one year younger. But it is one more year in a dynasty league at peak running back age (25-27)
 
This should be an easy vote. Not only is Barber in a better situation, he is most likely the better talent and far more proven. Oh as well as younger.
Your other statements make sense, other than the "younger" thing, which really has no bearing here since Turner has got near zero mileage on him.
Age is more important than mileage. And since neither of them has a recent high workload history that would increase the injury concern, the fact that Barber is a year younger is one factor. Not a factor that should lead you to, say, choose a clearly inferior back who is one year younger. But it is one more year in a dynasty league at peak running back age (25-27)
Isn't Barber 2 years younger? 24 vs. 26 for Turner.Edit: The way the BDays work it it's basically a year and 4 months younger.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:confused: I was going to say...you don't usually make proclamations that are that far off base :mellow:
Thanks, I think...FYI, to illustrate how far off the chart the Barber hype is right now, in the thread which I was thinking of, someone said that Barber was a top-5 dynasty back, and better than Joseph Addai in a dynasty league. :lmao:
I don't see Barber being much more valuable than he was this year. He runs so hard that he simply can't get the ball that much IMO. He also has almost no breakaway ability and he will only get into the top 10 if he stays healthy and others are injured. I see him finishing in that 7-12 range if he stays healthy.
 
This should be an easy vote. Not only is Barber in a better situation, he is most likely the better talent and far more proven. Oh as well as younger.
I think Turners breakaway ability gives him an edge. Barber clearly has great balance and determination, but I think Turner is the type of guy who could carry the ball more times and give you some long carries. If I had a pro team I would take Turner over Barber, but in a fantasy league, the Dallas situation is much better.
 
There's been a study on this -- take a look at some of Chase's recent threads, I believe he references it. Ultimately you can't draw the conclusion that a backup should have a higher YPC. In fact, I think the data suggested that more carries in a game tended to result in HIGHER YPC.
Correlation doesn't imply causation, though. I think it's more likely that a high YPC causes more carries than it is that more carries cause a high YPC. Teams keep doing whatever is working.
 
:confused: I was going to say...you don't usually make proclamations that are that far off base :mellow:
Thanks, I think...FYI, to illustrate how far off the chart the Barber hype is right now, in the thread which I was thinking of, someone said that Barber was a top-5 dynasty back, and better than Joseph Addai in a dynasty league. :lmao:
I don't see Barber being much more valuable than he was this year. He runs so hard that he simply can't get the ball that much IMO. He also has almost no breakaway ability and he will only get into the top 10 if he stays healthy and others are injured. I see him finishing in that 7-12 range if he stays healthy.
He finished as #7 this year, in a RBBC with Julius Jones. So you're assuming that one or more of the following occur in order for him to stay at 7, or even drop a bit:1 - His role in the offense stays the same or decreases next year

2 - The Dallas offense won't be as productive

3 - Barber gets injured

Unless he gets injured or the Cowboys bring in a big-time back to compete with him, I just don't see how he doesn't better his stats from last season.

 
:thumbup: I was going to say...you don't usually make proclamations that are that far off base :thumbup:
Thanks, I think...FYI, to illustrate how far off the chart the Barber hype is right now, in the thread which I was thinking of, someone said that Barber was a top-5 dynasty back, and better than Joseph Addai in a dynasty league. :no:
I don't see Barber being much more valuable than he was this year. He runs so hard that he simply can't get the ball that much IMO. He also has almost no breakaway ability and he will only get into the top 10 if he stays healthy and others are injured. I see him finishing in that 7-12 range if he stays healthy.
He finished as #7 this year, in a RBBC with Julius Jones. So you're assuming that one or more of the following occur in order for him to stay at 7, or even drop a bit:1 - His role in the offense stays the same or decreases next year

2 - The Dallas offense won't be as productive

3 - Barber gets injured

Unless he gets injured or the Cowboys bring in a big-time back to compete with him, I just don't see how he doesn't better his stats from last season.
Barber's 198 FP last year would have ranked 10th in '06, 11th in '05, 13th in '04, 13th in '03 and 18th in '02. On average, 198 FP is a bit below RB12. But last year, lots of RBs got hurt or had odd down years. I'm not sure I'd bank on that happening again.
 
:thumbup: I was going to say...you don't usually make proclamations that are that far off base :thumbup:
Thanks, I think...FYI, to illustrate how far off the chart the Barber hype is right now, in the thread which I was thinking of, someone said that Barber was a top-5 dynasty back, and better than Joseph Addai in a dynasty league. :no:
I don't see Barber being much more valuable than he was this year. He runs so hard that he simply can't get the ball that much IMO. He also has almost no breakaway ability and he will only get into the top 10 if he stays healthy and others are injured. I see him finishing in that 7-12 range if he stays healthy.
He finished as #7 this year, in a RBBC with Julius Jones. So you're assuming that one or more of the following occur in order for him to stay at 7, or even drop a bit:1 - His role in the offense stays the same or decreases next year

2 - The Dallas offense won't be as productive

3 - Barber gets injured

Unless he gets injured or the Cowboys bring in a big-time back to compete with him, I just don't see how he doesn't better his stats from last season.
Barber's 198 FP last year would have ranked 10th in '06, 11th in '05, 13th in '04, 13th in '03 and 18th in '02. On average, 198 FP is a bit below RB12. But last year, lots of RBs got hurt or had odd down years. I'm not sure I'd bank on that happening again.
This agrument really holds no water considering the fact that of the top 10 RBs last year, despite injuries or missed games or whatever else you want to base stats on, Barber was SIGNIFICANTLY lower than all of them in total touches. Barber is the ONLY top 10 RB from last year that did so while amassing less than 250 touches. Barber recorded only 248 touches. The next lowest was Peterson at 257. After that, no other top 10 RB was under 300 total touches. Do you really expect that a healthy Barber will touch the ball LESS in 2008?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't say much about Turner because I really haven't watched him a ton, but I have seen nearly every snap Barber has taken in the NFL.

For some highlights:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgnOrrE9Zng

A few opinions I have on Barber...

Good:

- Might have the best balance of any RB in the NFL. Can bounce and spin out of tackles that don't seem possible.

- Has an excellent jump/cut. Notice many of the plays he makes multiple cuts without losing much acceleration.

- Not a burner, but speed is adequate to get outside.

- Runs like a bull and rarely shies away from contact.

Bad:

- Too often tries to make something big out of nothing and gets dropped for a loss/no gain.

- Good near the endzone, but not the greatest short down back.

- Has not proven he can carry the load. Wore out in the second half of the Giants playoff game after getting 20+ carries early.

- Runs like a bull and rarely shies away from contact.

Bottom Line:

Barber's style of play is so much fun to watch and he has proven to be extremely effective when used sparingly. If he can prove he can carry a full workload, there is no reason he can't be a top-five back in the Dallas offense.

 
I don't like comparisons like this because it's a lose, lose situation for Marion Barber.

If you happen to think he's a better player or does better it's only because of his situation.

All I can say is all I've heard from Turner supporters his entire career are excuses. Excuses that he's behind the best back in the league and if he wasn't, he'd be close to the best himself.

Now, he gets out from underneath LT2 and there's more excuses.

His he going to retire the best player of all time but because of Lt2 or playing for Atlanta, that kept him from showcasing it? The more I read about people that know about Turner, the more I think he needs the perfect situation to be successful.

Is the guy a stud or not. Studs do studly things when given the chance. I have no idea how Turner will do in Atlanta, I don't know as much about him as many people on here. But what I do know is this board as I read it all the time and I've read about way too many excuses for why this guy has never gone off.

If he's great, we'll see it this year.

 
I don't like comparisons like this because it's a lose, lose situation for Marion Barber.If you happen to think he's a better player or does better it's only because of his situation. All I can say is all I've heard from Turner supporters his entire career are excuses. Excuses that he's behind the best back in the league and if he wasn't, he'd be close to the best himself.Now, he gets out from underneath LT2 and there's more excuses.His he going to retire the best player of all time but because of Lt2 or playing for Atlanta, that kept him from showcasing it? The more I read about people that know about Turner, the more I think he needs the perfect situation to be successful.Is the guy a stud or not. Studs do studly things when given the chance. I have no idea how Turner will do in Atlanta, I don't know as much about him as many people on here. But what I do know is this board as I read it all the time and I've read about way too many excuses for why this guy has never gone off.If he's great, we'll see it this year.
I've been on record for a while now saying that I think Turner is severely overrated. I guess we will see this year now that he has the lead role. :bye:
 
Barber will probably get around 1100 yards, 11 TD's rushing, 40 receptions and 2 Td's receiving.

So, if you think Turner does more than that, then you should take him before Barber, at least in a redraft.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top