I agree with all of that except, "decent line", and "unless SA is still considered a RB". Unless SA gets cut, he is the starter as long as Holgram is the coach. IMO it's bad for JJ owners unless SA is cut.wow, you gotta think this is a solid landing place for JJ, decent line and really no competition unless SA is still considered a RB
I agree with all of that except, "decent line", and "unless SA is still considered a RB". Unless SA gets cut, he is the starter as long as Holmgrem is the coach. IMO it's bad for JJ owners unless SA is cut.wow, you gotta think this is a solid landing place for JJ, decent line and really no competition unless SA is still considered a RB
Sure, MoMo is gone IMO, but Duckett isn't a threat, and neither is Jones as long as Holmgren is the coach. Sorry guys, but Alexander will still be the starter as long as Holmgren is the coach.Well, it cant be good for SA no matter if he is cut or not. They are not paying Duckett and Julius to sit and do nothing ...MoMo can go ahead and pack too ...
That occurred to me for a sec, but I think that fat contract would keep anyone for trading for the shadow of the player he was a few years ago. MoMo wouldn't seem to have much trade value either.I agree that it looks like SA is soon to be cut (despite what Ruskell said a week ago -- f'n liar!Would Alexander be cut outright or be traded during the draft for a 6th or 7th round pick?
Not to be a jerk, but does it really matter?? The cap hurt would be the same.Would Alexander be cut outright or be traded during the draft for a 6th or 7th round pick?
Unless he is cut of course. If he stays in Seattle, he's the starter over JJ, Duckett, and little bo peep.So the Seahawks go out and sign Duckett to a long-term deal, then follow it up with Julius Jones, and JohnnyU still thinks SA is the starter? That seems highly unlikely.
I think its crazier to still think seattle is looking at a rb in round 1 lol. Thats one crowded backfieldSo the Seahawks go out and sign Duckett to a long-term deal, then follow it up with Julius Jones, and JohnnyU still thinks SA is the starter? That seems highly unlikely.
ineffectiveness does wonders to the depth chartI agree with all of that except, "decent line", and "unless SA is still considered a RB". Unless SA gets cut, he is the starter as long as Holmgrem is the coach. IMO it's bad for JJ owners unless SA is cut.wow, you gotta think this is a solid landing place for JJ, decent line and really no competition unless SA is still considered a RB
?So Seattle doesn't plan on running this year either?
I agreeWhy is everyone selling Duckett so short? He was a solid back in ATL, had a bad year in Washington and looked decent again in Detroit. His weight is now under control and he is playing good football.
That changes nothing. I believe that SA wrist injury caused a lot of ineffectiveness last year. He had to change his style of running with carrying the ball. He just might surprise some this year who are slamming him now.ineffectiveness does wonders to the depth chartI agree with all of that except, "decent line", and "unless SA is still considered a RB". Unless SA gets cut, he is the starter as long as Holmgrem is the coach. IMO it's bad for JJ owners unless SA is cut.wow, you gotta think this is a solid landing place for JJ, decent line and really no competition unless SA is still considered a RB
ummm how about the fact that he avoids contact like the black plague, i was in Seattle for 3 weeks in October/November, and wow, did the talks shows rip this guy, one day they had a contest on what's the worst thing you can call Shaun Alexander that's airable........somebody called in and goes the worst thing i can do is call Shaun Alexander is "Shaun Alexander" cause nobody should be that soft.....That changes nothing. I believe that SA wrist injury caused a lot of ineffectiveness last year. He had to change his style of running with carrying the ball. He just might surprise some this year who are slamming him now.ineffectiveness does wonders to the depth chartI agree with all of that except, "decent line", and "unless SA is still considered a RB". Unless SA gets cut, he is the starter as long as Holmgrem is the coach. IMO it's bad for JJ owners unless SA is cut.wow, you gotta think this is a solid landing place for JJ, decent line and really no competition unless SA is still considered a RB
Yep.I believe that SA wrist injury caused a lot of ineffectiveness last year. He had to change his style of running with carrying the ball. He just might surprise some this year who are slamming him now.
Oh, I KNOW he does lollol all those who think JohnnyU has SA on his team lift their handsThat changes nothing.ineffectiveness does wonders to the depth chartI agree with all of that except, "decent line", and "unless SA is still considered a RB". Unless SA gets cut, he is the starter as long as Holmgrem is the coach. IMO it's bad for JJ owners unless SA is cut.wow, you gotta think this is a solid landing place for JJ, decent line and really no competition unless SA is still considered a RB![]()
That wouldn't be a surprise to anyone. Of course he could be cut. But if he stays, he plays. Now bump that in October.I look forward to bumping this thread when SA is cut.
Great landing spot for JJ. He should get major playing time next season.I doubt the Seahawks will use a first day pick on a RB now, although it remains a slight possibility. I didn't think Stewart or Mendenhall would be available at their pick anyway.
Will bump it either way.That wouldn't be a surprise to anyone. Of course he could be cut. But if he stays, he plays. Now bump that in October.I look forward to bumping this thread when SA is cut.
I have the deadbeat in 1 of 7 leagues. Like I said, if HE ISN'T CUT, he is the starter. Bank on it. If he is cut, then we all expected it, lol.Oh, I KNOW he does lollol all those who think JohnnyU has SA on his team lift their handsThat changes nothing.ineffectiveness does wonders to the depth chartI agree with all of that except, "decent line", and "unless SA is still considered a RB". Unless SA gets cut, he is the starter as long as Holmgrem is the coach. IMO it's bad for JJ owners unless SA is cut.wow, you gotta think this is a solid landing place for JJ, decent line and really no competition unless SA is still considered a RB![]()
Even if he isnt cut and starts the year he better be getting the job done, ya know.I have the deadbeat in 1 of 7 leagues. Like I said, if HE ISN'T CUT, he is the starter. Bank on it. If he is cut, then we all expected it, lol.Oh, I KNOW he does lollol all those who think JohnnyU has SA on his team lift their handsThat changes nothing.ineffectiveness does wonders to the depth chartI agree with all of that except, "decent line", and "unless SA is still considered a RB". Unless SA gets cut, he is the starter as long as Holmgrem is the coach. IMO it's bad for JJ owners unless SA is cut.wow, you gotta think this is a solid landing place for JJ, decent line and really no competition unless SA is still considered a RB![]()
Are you saying that you will bump it if he stays in Seattle and is the starter? Of course if you bump it when he gets cut, that isn't news to anyone.Will bump it either way.That wouldn't be a surprise to anyone. Of course he could be cut. But if he stays, he plays. Now bump that in October.I look forward to bumping this thread when SA is cut.
That's a given.Even if he isnt cut and starts the year he better be getting the job done, ya know.I have the deadbeat in 1 of 7 leagues. Like I said, if HE ISN'T CUT, he is the starter. Bank on it. If he is cut, then we all expected it, lol.Oh, I KNOW he does lollol all those who think JohnnyU has SA on his team lift their handsThat changes nothing.ineffectiveness does wonders to the depth chartI agree with all of that except, "decent line", and "unless SA is still considered a RB". Unless SA gets cut, he is the starter as long as Holmgrem is the coach. IMO it's bad for JJ owners unless SA is cut.wow, you gotta think this is a solid landing place for JJ, decent line and really no competition unless SA is still considered a RB![]()
![]()
Yes - thus the "either way". typically that implies 2 potential outcomes - cut or not cut. BTW - it's not exactly going out on a limb to say "if he's not cut, he's the starter". It's like me saying "if I become a billionaire, I'll give away 1/2 my money". Since the odds of each even happening are close to zero, the consequences are almost unproveable.Are you saying that you will bump it if he stays in Seattle and is the starter? Of course if you bump it when he gets cut, that isn't news to anyone.Will bump it either way.That wouldn't be a surprise to anyone. Of course he could be cut. But if he stays, he plays. Now bump that in October.I look forward to bumping this thread when SA is cut.
Couldnt have picked a better year too. I would think a 3rd round RB should be an upgrade over Julius's normal production.And now it's 100 percent certain that the Cowboys will draft a RB.
OK...lol.Yes - thus the "either way". typically that implies 2 potential outcomes - cut or not cut. BTW - it's not exactly going out on a limb to say "if he's not cut, he's the starter". It's like me saying "if I become a billionaire, I'll give away 1/2 my money". Since the odds of each even happening are close to zero, the consequences are almost unproveable.Are you saying that you will bump it if he stays in Seattle and is the starter? Of course if you bump it when he gets cut, that isn't news to anyone.Will bump it either way.That wouldn't be a surprise to anyone. Of course he could be cut. But if he stays, he plays. Now bump that in October.I look forward to bumping this thread when SA is cut.
My way of saying Duckett/JJ isn't really an upgrade from Alexander/Morris.I'm guessing Hass will be chucking it 40-45 times a game again this year.?So Seattle doesn't plan on running this year either?
Gotta love all the JJ supporters when A) he was awful with a far superior O-line in Dallas B) He is no better than SA or MorrisAlexander looked awful last year.....JJ was no better (with a far better O-line).Frankly, I think Duckett is the better than Jones.
I like Weaver and Duckett, but one or both seem buried.So were does Weaver fit in this plan? He seems very similar to Duckett.
couldn't you say the exact same thing about the Duckett supporters, other than the far superior offensive line.not a Jones supporter, as much as I'm a believer that SA is done.Gotta love all the JJ supporters when A) he was awful with a far superior O-line in Dallas B) He is no better than SA or MorrisAlexander looked awful last year.....JJ was no better (with a far better O-line).
LOL, you may be on to something there.My way of saying Duckett/JJ isn't really an upgrade from Alexander/Morris.I'm guessing Hass will be chucking it 40-45 times a game again this year.?So Seattle doesn't plan on running this year either?