What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

[Dynasty] - RB #28 (1 Viewer)

Who would you draft as the #28 RB, standard FBG scoring

  • Ahmad Bradshaw NYG 3/26/1986

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Edgerin James ARI 8/1/1978

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ray Rice ROOKIE

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Felix Jones ROOKIE

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Thomas Jones NYJ 8/19/1978

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Selvin Young DEN 11/1/1983

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jerious Norwood ATL 7/29/1983

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Julius Jones SEA 8/14/1981

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Selvin Young DEN 11/1/1983

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chris Johnson ROOKIE

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Matt Forte ROOKIE

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Justin Fargas OAK 1/25/1980

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other - WHO?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
yeah, now it gets really tough. If you're gunning to win now Edge is man IMO, though he'll have a short shelf-life. I'm intrigued by guys like Fargas and Julius Jones, though I don't think I'd take either of them over Felix Jones.

 
Had a tough time between the Jones' Boyz!

Went with Thomas as he has little wear & tear and is not an injury concern like JJ is.

The possibility that NYJets do not take McFadden makes TJ a better option IMO.

If McFadden lands with the Jets.... they both drop a little.

 
Bradshaw had a nice playoff run but I don't understand all the love here having him that high. That said I was tempted by Young as an interesting gamble. Instead I went in the opposite direction for a gamble pick instead of young w/ potential went to the tried and proven veteran.

I am the one so far with the OTHER vote with a gamble on Shaun Alexander. I am guessing he will be healthy and the O line improved. I do not see Jones as an immediate threat for taking over and if Alexander does bounce back Jones will have to move on like Ahman Green back in the day.

 
Bradshaw had a nice playoff run but I don't understand all the love here having him that high. That said I was tempted by Young as an interesting gamble. Instead I went in the opposite direction for a gamble pick instead of young w/ potential went to the tried and proven veteran.

I am the one so far with the OTHER vote with a gamble on Shaun Alexander. I am guessing he will be healthy and the O line improved. I do not see Jones as an immediate threat for taking over and if Alexander does bounce back Jones will have to move on like Ahman Green back in the day.
If you want to gamble, do it on a player like Bradshaw. You know what you are getting with SA, thats not a gamble, thats giving your money away.
 
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring

 
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring
Freddy T... I would still pass.I would start thinking about Chris Henry

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring
I don't know who you're talking about, the closest I see had 1222 rushing and 204 receiving in 2007.
 
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring
I don't know who you're talking about, the closest I see had 1222 rushing and 204 receiving in 2007.
Well, someone's math is off - not sure who.... but that is him. Edge
I orginally typed Edge too...
 
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring
I don't know who you're talking about, the closest I see had 1222 rushing and 204 receiving in 2007.
Well, someone's math is off - not sure who.... but that is him. Edge
PFR says 1222 and 204 as well.Let's see... NFL.com, PFR, or FBG? :lmao:

 
Interesting, Bradshaw and JJ going toe to toe! I can't get rid of the thought on how Bradshaw was clearly the better NYG back during the playoff run, great o-line and plenty of upside.

 
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring
I don't know who you're talking about, the closest I see had 1222 rushing and 204 receiving in 2007.
Well, someone's math is off - not sure who.... but that is him. Edge
So realistically Jeff, how many years do you think he has left?
 
Interesting, Bradshaw and JJ going toe to toe! I can't get rid of the thought on how Bradshaw was clearly the better NYG back during the playoff run, great o-line and plenty of upside.
IMO, Bradshaw has a higher ceiling--we have seen JJ's and it isn't elite--but RIGHT NOW JJ has a better situation as he really has no one in front of him. He DOES has Duckett who is getting good $$$, and who will likely take the goal line carries just as Barber did in Dallas, and personally, I will be surprised if Seattle doesn't draft someone in the first day to be the back of the future.In short, JJ offers more immediate and likely return, but Bradshaw offers more upside for the future.
 
Interesting, Bradshaw and JJ going toe to toe! I can't get rid of the thought on how Bradshaw was clearly the better NYG back during the playoff run, great o-line and plenty of upside.
IMO, Bradshaw has a higher ceiling--we have seen JJ's and it isn't elite--but RIGHT NOW JJ has a better situation as he really has no one in front of him. He DOES has Duckett who is getting good $$$, and who will likely take the goal line carries just as Barber did in Dallas, and personally, I will be surprised if Seattle doesn't draft someone in the first day to be the back of the future.In short, JJ offers more immediate and likely return, but Bradshaw offers more upside for the future.
Agreed.People in my leagues have made offers for him but nothing enough to get me to let Bradshaw go. 1st round pick in 2009. I like Bradshaws chances to have starting role by then more than a unknown rookie.There is some risk involved with him. But look at his ability. Look at where he has come from. Look at the Giants history. See Tiki Barber.People who cannot see the opportunity here are just putting their heads in the sand.
 
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring
I don't know who you're talking about, the closest I see had 1222 rushing and 204 receiving in 2007.
Well, someone's math is off - not sure who.... but that is him. Edge
So realistically Jeff, how many years do you think he has left?
Considering how he did last year with a new coach and scheme, I could see him as a RB2 for the next two years then starting to taper off.Even if you get two years at 90% of what he did last year, that's better than RB28.

Sure you can go for a rookie or lesser proven player, but again I prefer those who have already performed at a high level. Yes the downside is coming, but I'll take 2 years of good performance.

 
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring
I don't know who you're talking about, the closest I see had 1222 rushing and 204 receiving in 2007.
Well, someone's math is off - not sure who.... but that is him. Edge
So realistically Jeff, how many years do you think he has left?
Considering how he did last year with a new coach and scheme, I could see him as a RB2 for the next two years then starting to taper off.Even if you get two years at 90% of what he did last year, that's better than RB28.

Sure you can go for a rookie or lesser proven player, but again I prefer those who have already performed at a high level. Yes the downside is coming, but I'll take 2 years of good performance.
I agree with you, but at this point people are expecting the Cards to take a RB. I'm totally shuked at the Bradshaw voters.
 
Bradshaw had a nice playoff run but I don't understand all the love here having him that high. That said I was tempted by Young as an interesting gamble. Instead I went in the opposite direction for a gamble pick instead of young w/ potential went to the tried and proven veteran.

I am the one so far with the OTHER vote with a gamble on Shaun Alexander. I am guessing he will be healthy and the O line improved. I do not see Jones as an immediate threat for taking over and if Alexander does bounce back Jones will have to move on like Ahman Green back in the day.
If you want to gamble, do it on a player like Bradshaw. You know what you are getting with SA, thats not a gamble, thats giving your money away.
If Bradshaw had showed more during the regular season I might have agreed with you but he didn't - Young would go ahead of Bradshaw at this point if I were gambling on longterm youth/potential.It would appear you are not a believer that Alexander can bounce back and you may be right - obviously Seattle wanted an insurance policy with Jones. I would take that gamble over Bradshaw right now (don't get me wrong I am not knocking Bradshaw but simply think he is getting to much love now because of a good run (with the rest of the team) through the playoffs and do not think that is a good indicator of how he will do over the course of next season)

 
Bradshaw had a nice playoff run but I don't understand all the love here having him that high. That said I was tempted by Young as an interesting gamble. Instead I went in the opposite direction for a gamble pick instead of young w/ potential went to the tried and proven veteran.

I am the one so far with the OTHER vote with a gamble on Shaun Alexander. I am guessing he will be healthy and the O line improved. I do not see Jones as an immediate threat for taking over and if Alexander does bounce back Jones will have to move on like Ahman Green back in the day.
If you want to gamble, do it on a player like Bradshaw. You know what you are getting with SA, thats not a gamble, thats giving your money away.
If Bradshaw had showed more during the regular season I might have agreed with you but he didn't - Young would go ahead of Bradshaw at this point if I were gambling on longterm youth/potential.It would appear you are not a believer that Alexander can bounce back and you may be right - obviously Seattle wanted an insurance policy with Jones. I would take that gamble over Bradshaw right now (don't get me wrong I am not knocking Bradshaw but simply think he is getting to much love now because of a good run (with the rest of the team) through the playoffs and do not think that is a good indicator of how he will do over the course of next season)
If you're worried about a $5M house, you spend maybe 10% on an insurance policy (likely less, I know, work with me here). You do NOT buy another $5M house.Seattle is done with SA.

 
Bradshaw had a nice playoff run but I don't understand all the love here having him that high. That said I was tempted by Young as an interesting gamble. Instead I went in the opposite direction for a gamble pick instead of young w/ potential went to the tried and proven veteran.

I am the one so far with the OTHER vote with a gamble on Shaun Alexander. I am guessing he will be healthy and the O line improved. I do not see Jones as an immediate threat for taking over and if Alexander does bounce back Jones will have to move on like Ahman Green back in the day.
If you want to gamble, do it on a player like Bradshaw. You know what you are getting with SA, thats not a gamble, thats giving your money away.
If Bradshaw had showed more during the regular season I might have agreed with you but he didn't - Young would go ahead of Bradshaw at this point if I were gambling on longterm youth/potential.It would appear you are not a believer that Alexander can bounce back and you may be right - obviously Seattle wanted an insurance policy with Jones. I would take that gamble over Bradshaw right now (don't get me wrong I am not knocking Bradshaw but simply think he is getting to much love now because of a good run (with the rest of the team) through the playoffs and do not think that is a good indicator of how he will do over the course of next season)
If Bradshaw had showed more during the regular season
He would be ranked alot higher because it would be obvious how good he is to everyone who doesnt already know.
obviously Seattle wanted an insurance policy with Jones
One thing is obvious, and thats SA is done, thats why Seattle signed two free agent RB's.
 
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring
I don't know who you're talking about, the closest I see had 1222 rushing and 204 receiving in 2007.
Well, someone's math is off - not sure who.... but that is him. Edge
So realistically Jeff, how many years do you think he has left?
Considering how he did last year with a new coach and scheme, I could see him as a RB2 for the next two years then starting to taper off.Even if you get two years at 90% of what he did last year, that's better than RB28.

Sure you can go for a rookie or lesser proven player, but again I prefer those who have already performed at a high level. Yes the downside is coming, but I'll take 2 years of good performance.
oh I agree with you. At this point its a good pickup. If you are in a complete rebuilding mode for your team, then I would look elsewhere, but if you are close with a very solid team, I would take Edge in a heartbeat.
 
I can't seem to give Edge away in one of my leagues.

I haven't sent too many offers out there, but I am asking

other owners if they are interested in acquiring him, and they

are staying away like he's the plague. I agree with Pasquino

here, I like Edge a lot for the next couple of seasons.

Most I've talked to think Arizona is going to spend a 1st round pick on a RB,

thus decreasing Edge's value substantially.

I'm guess I'll have to use the #8 overall FF RB as my #3 RB for 2008..... not so bad.

.

 
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring
I don't know who you're talking about, the closest I see had 1222 rushing and 204 receiving in 2007.
Well, someone's math is off - not sure who.... but that is him. Edge
So realistically Jeff, how many years do you think he has left?
Considering how he did last year with a new coach and scheme, I could see him as a RB2 for the next two years then starting to taper off.Even if you get two years at 90% of what he did last year, that's better than RB28.

Sure you can go for a rookie or lesser proven player, but again I prefer those who have already performed at a high level. Yes the downside is coming, but I'll take 2 years of good performance.
I totally disagree with this line of thinking. At this point, a fantasy team already has some proven players. To pick a player that has already peaked and get no exit value in return is not a good choice. If you pick a talented rookie here, even if you don't like what you see, chances are you can still sell the "potential" angle to someone and get decent value. Edge will be worthless in a year. I still say the smartest strategy is to get players before they peak, with an emphasis on talent rather than situation. Felix Jones, Ray Rice, and Jamal Charles are all worth more than Edge.
 
Let's play Who Am I? .......

2006: 16 games, 1159 yards rushing, 217 receiving, 6 TDs - #20 overall in FBG scoring

2007: 16 games, 1232 yards rushing, 196 receiving, 7 TDs - #10 overall in FBG scoring
I don't know who you're talking about, the closest I see had 1222 rushing and 204 receiving in 2007.
Well, someone's math is off - not sure who.... but that is him. Edge
So realistically Jeff, how many years do you think he has left?
Considering how he did last year with a new coach and scheme, I could see him as a RB2 for the next two years then starting to taper off.Even if you get two years at 90% of what he did last year, that's better than RB28.

Sure you can go for a rookie or lesser proven player, but again I prefer those who have already performed at a high level. Yes the downside is coming, but I'll take 2 years of good performance.
I totally disagree with this line of thinking. At this point, a fantasy team already has some proven players. To pick a player that has already peaked and get no exit value in return is not a good choice. If you pick a talented rookie here, even if you don't like what you see, chances are you can still sell the "potential" angle to someone and get decent value. Edge will be worthless in a year. I still say the smartest strategy is to get players before they peak, with an emphasis on talent rather than situation. Felix Jones, Ray Rice, and Jamal Charles are all worth more than Edge.
I agree. Didnt Jeff learn from Shaun Alexander at 5th overall in his dynasty rankings last season
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top