What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2008 rb class vs 2007 rb class (1 Viewer)

Almas_4th_Child

Footballguy
2007 class

ADP, Lynch, Ahmad Bradshaw, Kenny Iron, Michael Bush, Antonio Pittman, Lorenzo Booker, Brian Leonard, Selvin Young, Tony Hunt

2008 class

McFadden, Stewart, Mendenhall, Felix Jones, Ray Rice, Chris Johnson, Kevin Smith, Jamaal Charles, Matt Forte.

Here is my question.

Does the 2008 class look soo good because we see potential?

I went back and was looking through highlights and that 2007 class was talented as well and some just didn't get their shot or were injured. That could very well happen to this 2008 class. I am just wondering if we(myself included) are overhyping this class or is it the real deal.

 
This class is definitely deeper. Peterson and Lynch were the only two probable starters last year. Kenny Irons was the only other back drafted on the first day who looked like a potential starter to me (maybe Brandon Jackson, but he never impressed me much).

This year you have three probable starters in Mendenhall, Stewart, and McFadden. Ray Rice, Felix Jones, and Chris Johnson are all possible starters who I would probably take over a fully healthy Irons. Kevin Smith, Tashard Choice, Jamaal Charles, and Matt Forte are more promising than most of the 2nd-4th round types last year. You could say Choice is a better version of Pittman, Forte is a better version of Leonard, and Charles is a better version of Booker. There are also some interesting 4th-7th round types this year.

There is no elite ADP type talent in this group, but it's a much deeper class than last year's.

 
2007 classADP, Lynch, Ahmad Bradshaw, Kenny Iron, Michael Bush, Antonio Pittman, Lorenzo Booker, Brian Leonard, Selvin Young, Tony Hunt2008 classMcFadden, Stewart, Mendenhall, Felix Jones, Ray Rice, Chris Johnson, Kevin Smith, Jamaal Charles, Matt Forte.Here is my question.Does the 2008 class look soo good because we see potential?
IMO if I were to rank the RBs in the two classes on "talent" it would be:Peterson------------------------------------McFadden------------------------------------LynchMendenhallJones------------------------------------Stewart------------------------------------CharlesBradshawRiceSlaton------------------------------------the rest of '07------------------------------------the rest of '08If I were to rank them on NFL potential:Peterson------------------------------------LynchMendenhallJones------------------------------------McFaddenStewart------------------------------------SlatonPittmannRice------------------------------------the rest of the pack altogether
 
2007 classADP, Lynch, Ahmad Bradshaw, Kenny Iron, Michael Bush, Antonio Pittman, Lorenzo Booker, Brian Leonard, Selvin Young, Tony Hunt2008 classMcFadden, Stewart, Mendenhall, Felix Jones, Ray Rice, Chris Johnson, Kevin Smith, Jamaal Charles, Matt Forte.Here is my question.Does the 2008 class look soo good because we see potential?
IMO if I were to rank the RBs in the two classes on "talent" it would be:Peterson------------------------------------McFadden------------------------------------LynchMendenhallJones------------------------------------Stewart------------------------------------CharlesBradshawRiceSlaton------------------------------------the rest of '07------------------------------------the rest of '08If I were to rank them on NFL potential:Peterson------------------------------------LynchMendenhallJones------------------------------------McFaddenStewart------------------------------------SlatonPittmannRice------------------------------------the rest of the pack altogether
Some interesting rankings switz......i guess i am in the minority in thinking that Felix Jones is a pretender.
 
Some interesting rankings switz......i guess i am in the minority in thinking that Felix Jones is a pretender.
I watched Arkansas a lot because I own McFadden. Jones is better than he looks on paper. In my mind, he's a first round talent that could slip to round two where he'd be excellent value. He may not start initially, but I think he'll develop into a quality NFL player one day.
 
Some interesting rankings switz......i guess i am in the minority in thinking that Felix Jones is a pretender.
I actually think I'm in the minority about Felix. In my opinion, he has the highest ceiling of this class, but you'll find few on the board who will agree with me.
 
It's also interesting how perceptions change from year to year. I recall many posts from last summer from people predicting that Peterson might turn into one of the best young RBs in the NFL by the end of the 2007 season, but that Peterson clearly would be eclipsed as the best young RB when McFadden reached the NFL in 2008. Many posts also came from people concerned that Peterson would fall to injury because of his running style and history of injuries. (The post I remember best was someone predicting that Peterson would share carries with Chester Taylor for the first part of the season, win the starting job in the second part of the season, and then go on IR after a vicious tackle "sends Peterson's collarbone flying into the stands"!) Now, a year later, Peterson is seen by many as better than LT, and McFadden is being described as an injury risk and a potential bust. Are people changing their views because they know more now about Peterson and McFadden? Or because Peterson had such a great rookie season? Or because there's always a lot of doubt about the #1 RB in any season?

My gut instinct is that this year's class is stronger than last year's class of RBs. However, I worry that my view (and everyone else's view) is skewed because we forget about incorrect predictions from last year. In other words, you will remember it if you predicted last summer that the first-round RBs (Peterson and Lynch) would be successful in the NFL, but you are less likely to remember it if you predicted that they would be busts. Similarly, you will remember it if you correctly predict McFadden to be a bust, but won't remember if you predicted wrong.

 
Some interesting rankings switz......i guess i am in the minority in thinking that Felix Jones is a pretender.
I actually think I'm in the minority about Felix. In my opinion, he has the highest ceiling of this class, but you'll find few on the board who will agree with me.
Can you tell me why you feel this way? I am extremely interested. I didn't watch a lot of Arkansas(which is why I would like more opinions) but I watched enough.This is my take on Felix Jones.First off, the kid has very good quickness as his short shuttle time showed. However, I didn't see that deep speed everyone was talking about and it showed with his 40 times.8 reps at 225...Does that show his lack of work ethic to get stronger? A guy that will always be weak upper body and rely on god give talent?I also see a guy that benefitted greatly in the offense and that Wildcat formation. Teams focused on mcfadden and then were out of position for Jones.He can changed direction very well and has good quickness. However, I just don't see an everydown RB that will go between the tackles at the next level or that 1st round grade Rb that everyone talked about. He is currently my 8th or 9th Rb in this class.
 
It's also interesting how perceptions change from year to year. I recall many posts from last summer from people predicting that Peterson might turn into one of the best young RBs in the NFL by the end of the 2007 season, but that Peterson clearly would be eclipsed as the best young RB when McFadden reached the NFL in 2008. Many posts also came from people concerned that Peterson would fall to injury because of his running style and history of injuries. (The post I remember best was someone predicting that Peterson would share carries with Chester Taylor for the first part of the season, win the starting job in the second part of the season, and then go on IR after a vicious tackle "sends Peterson's collarbone flying into the stands"!) Now, a year later, Peterson is seen by many as better than LT, and McFadden is being described as an injury risk and a potential bust. Are people changing their views because they know more now about Peterson and McFadden? Or because Peterson had such a great rookie season? Or because there's always a lot of doubt about the #1 RB in any season?My gut instinct is that this year's class is stronger than last year's class of RBs. However, I worry that my view (and everyone else's view) is skewed because we forget about incorrect predictions from last year. In other words, you will remember it if you predicted last summer that the first-round RBs (Peterson and Lynch) would be successful in the NFL, but you are less likely to remember it if you predicted that they would be busts. Similarly, you will remember it if you correctly predict McFadden to be a bust, but won't remember if you predicted wrong.
I don't think it's just hindsight. After Peterson, Lynch, and Irons, what you had last year was a whole lot of garbage. I was saying as much all along. Some of the guys people were reaching for in the first round last year (Bush, Leonard, Booker, Henry) had no business going that high and probably wouldn't even be among my top 10 RBs in this year's crop. This is a deeper, more talented field. Many of the second tier backs have legitimate starting potential. I didn't feel that way last year. If you didn't have a top 2 pick last year and you needed a RB, you were pretty much screwed. As for Peterson/McFadden, I think people are always looking for the next big thing. So there's a tendency to get prematurely excited about younger players. It wasn't long ago that posts like "Steven Jackson is good, but Maurice Clarett will be a beast when he's eligible" and "Steve Slaton is the next Reggie Bush" were tossed around. I think this partially explains some of the "McFadden > Peterson" stuff that might have been writen last year. In fairness though, McFadden is a comparable prospect in terms of draft hype and college stardom.
 
I worry that my view (and everyone else's view) is skewed because we forget about incorrect predictions from last year. In other words, you will remember it if you predicted last summer that the first-round RBs (Peterson and Lynch) would be successful in the NFL, but you are less likely to remember it if you predicted that they would be busts. Similarly, you will remember it if you correctly predict McFadden to be a bust, but won't remember if you predicted wrong.
Here are some links I found with a very quick search of last summer's posts. By the way, I am pretty impressed with the people who predicted back then that Jonathan Stewart would be ranked so highly. I
I would have a hard time choosing between McFadden and Peterson. Really.
Next year's RBs don't necessarily look very good either. McFadden and Slaton are my top two right now, but they're not as good as Peterson and Lynch. Rice and Hart are college stars with limited pro potential.
 
Some interesting rankings switz......i guess i am in the minority in thinking that Felix Jones is a pretender.
I actually think I'm in the minority about Felix. In my opinion, he has the highest ceiling of this class, but you'll find few on the board who will agree with me.
Can you tell me why you feel this way? I am extremely interested. I didn't watch a lot of Arkansas(which is why I would like more opinions) but I watched enough.This is my take on Felix Jones.First off, the kid has very good quickness as his short shuttle time showed. However, I didn't see that deep speed everyone was talking about and it showed with his 40 times.8 reps at 225...Does that show his lack of work ethic to get stronger? A guy that will always be weak upper body and rely on god give talent?I also see a guy that benefitted greatly in the offense and that Wildcat formation. Teams focused on mcfadden and then were out of position for Jones.He can changed direction very well and has good quickness. However, I just don't see an everydown RB that will go between the tackles at the next level or that 1st round grade Rb that everyone talked about. He is currently my 8th or 9th Rb in this class.
Your take is right on the money. The big issue with Jones is the lack of running strength. NFL.com has an interesting statistic on Felix: He had just 22 runs on which the opposition needed more than one defender to take him down on 133 attempts in 2007. Once someone gets a hand on him, he's toast. He's still a good prospect because he has good overall athletic ability and explosiveness, but there's some third down back risk with him.
 
I worry that my view (and everyone else's view) is skewed because we forget about incorrect predictions from last year. In other words, you will remember it if you predicted last summer that the first-round RBs (Peterson and Lynch) would be successful in the NFL, but you are less likely to remember it if you predicted that they would be busts. Similarly, you will remember it if you correctly predict McFadden to be a bust, but won't remember if you predicted wrong.
Here are some links I found with a very quick search of last summer's posts. By the way, I am pretty impressed with the people who predicted back then that Jonathan Stewart would be ranked so highly. I
I would have a hard time choosing between McFadden and Peterson. Really.
Next year's RBs don't necessarily look very good either. McFadden and Slaton are my top two right now, but they're not as good as Peterson and Lynch. Rice and Hart are college stars with limited pro potential.
Looks like nobody had much to say. :goodposting:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Next year's RBs don't necessarily look very good either. McFadden and Slaton are my top two right now, but they're not as good as Peterson and Lynch. Rice and Hart are college stars with limited pro potential.
This is why you can't judge a class until after they've played their final seasons. There are almost always a few guys who come out of nowhere and blow up over the course of their last year. The emergence of Rashard Mendenhall and Jonathan Stewart has been a huge boon to this year's crop. We saw the same sort of thing with Chris Johnson, Matt Forte, and Kevin Smith. Was ANYONE touting these guys last year? Doubt it. Slaton and Hart were never as good as their press clippings. I had a hunch about that all along, although there was obviously a time when I was willing to give Slaton the benefit of the doubt. Rice won me over pretty early in the 2007 evaluation process. I still think McFadden is overrated and < Peterson. Anyhow, opinions are flexibile. Some players rise and some players fall. The same thing will happen with the 2009 crop. Right now it's kind of uninspiring. Wells and Moreno look like the two first round picks. Murray, Spiller, Davis, Sutton, and Keiland are in the mix. But you can bump this post a year from now when I'm dogging some of these players and hyping some guy who's currently an afterthought.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This [year's RB class] is a deeper, more talented field [than last year]. Many of the second tier backs have legitimate starting potential.
Don't get me wrong -- I completely agree with this statement. I just worry that even my own judgment is clouded by the natural tendency to overestimate the potential of any new crop!
 
Pete Carroll was on Movin' The Chains with Tim and Pat yesterday. He was raving about Mendenhall. He had high praise for both Stewart and McFadden. He sees Felix as a third down "scat back".

 
if you just look at the college production of the guys in this class, I think it is fairly clear that this class is much deeper.

I don't think Lynch would have been in the top 3 in this class. I think he's more comparable to Rice, Charles, etc... as there were a large amount of questions about him.

Chris Henry and Brandon Jackson would be late round picks. Jackson picked an ideal time to come out to maximize his paycheck. He never even had 1000 yards rushing and I would compare him more to Cory Boyd who barely scratches most people's top 15

 
I don't think Lynch would have been in the top 3 in this class. I think he's more comparable to Rice, Charles, etc... as there were a large amount of questions about him.
:goodposting: Lynch is a typical first round RB prospect. Good build. Good combine. Good career. Charles and Rice may end up being good pro runners, but there's no way their draft stock compares to Marshawn's. He would be a top 15-25 pick if he were eligible this year.
 
I don't think Lynch would have been in the top 3 in this class. I think he's more comparable to Rice, Charles, etc... as there were a large amount of questions about him.
:no: Lynch is a typical first round RB prospect. Good build. Good combine. Good career. Charles and Rice may end up being good pro runners, but there's no way their draft stock compares to Marshawn's. He would be a top 15-25 pick if he were eligible this year.
Lynch's injury history was scrutinized. He never carried the full load in college. There were some off the field issues that he may have ##### slapped his ex-GF.Not sure he had that great of a combine either. That 7 second plus 3 cone shuttle was only ahead of Jason SnellingHis value was inflated last year due to the lack of depth
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think Lynch would have been in the top 3 in this class. I think he's more comparable to Rice, Charles, etc... as there were a large amount of questions about him.
:thumbup: Lynch is a typical first round RB prospect. Good build. Good combine. Good career. Charles and Rice may end up being good pro runners, but there's no way their draft stock compares to Marshawn's. He would be a top 15-25 pick if he were eligible this year.
Lynch's injury history was scrutinized. He never carried the full load in college. There were some off the field issues that he may have ##### slapped his ex-GF.Not sure he had that great of a combine either. That 7 second plus 3 cone shuttle was only ahead of Jason SnellingHis value was inflated last year due to the lack of depth
Disagree completely. He's a first round prospect in any draft.
 
I don't think Lynch would have been in the top 3 in this class. I think he's more comparable to Rice, Charles, etc... as there were a large amount of questions about him.
:thumbup: Lynch is a typical first round RB prospect. Good build. Good combine. Good career. Charles and Rice may end up being good pro runners, but there's no way their draft stock compares to Marshawn's. He would be a top 15-25 pick if he were eligible this year.
Lynch's injury history was scrutinized. He never carried the full load in college. There were some off the field issues that he may have ##### slapped his ex-GF.Not sure he had that great of a combine either. That 7 second plus 3 cone shuttle was only ahead of Jason SnellingHis value was inflated last year due to the lack of depth
Disagree completely. He's a first round prospect in any draft.
since you disagree completely...Lynch had a history of being durable, never assaulted his GF, ran faster than 7 seconds in the 3 cone, and he carried a full load in college. Interesting, what planet was that on?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What are your rankings for the RB's from this years class?
Here's my somewhat fluid top 10:1. Jonathan Stewart2. Rashard Mendenhall3. Darren McFadden4. Ray Rice5. Felix Jones6. Chris Johnson7. Tashard Choice8. Kevin Smith9. Jamaal Charles10. Matt ForteI might shuffle the top 3 and bump Johnson ahead of Jones. Where I expect them to be drafted:1. Darren McFadden 2. Rashard Mendenhall 3. Jonathan Stewart 4. Chris Johnson 5. Felix Jones6. Jamaal Charles7. Ray Rice8. Matt Forte9. Kevin Smith10. Tashard Choice
 
What are your rankings for the RB's from this years class?
Here's my somewhat fluid top 10:1. Jonathan Stewart2. Rashard Mendenhall3. Darren McFadden4. Ray Rice5. Felix Jones6. Chris Johnson7. Tashard Choice8. Kevin Smith9. Jamaal Charles10. Matt ForteI might shuffle the top 3 and bump Johnson ahead of Jones. Where I expect them to be drafted:1. Darren McFadden 2. Rashard Mendenhall 3. Jonathan Stewart 4. Chris Johnson 5. Felix Jones6. Jamaal Charles7. Ray Rice8. Matt Forte9. Kevin Smith10. Tashard Choice
Im feeling more of theMendenhallStewartMcFaddenRay RiceMatt ForteJamaal CharlesKevin SmithChris JohnsonFelix JonesSteve Slaton
 
since you disagree completely...Lynch had a history of being durable, never assaulted his GF, ran faster than 7 seconds in the 3 cone, and he carried a full load in college. Interesting, what planet was that on?
The guy was an impact player at Cal from day one. Everyone and their brother had him as a first round talent throughout his entire junior year. It isn't like he was a late riser or some shocking reach. Pretty much the entire world thought he'd be a first round pick. The 3 cone time? Same as Peterson's. Same as Addai's. Hardly a legitimate knock. Never carried a full load? First off, it doesn't really matter (see: Bush, McFadden, Addai). Secondly, I think you're wrong. He had 223 carries in 13 games in 2006, which extrapolates to 274 carries over a 16 game season. If that isn't a full load, then it's pretty darn close. Lynch had 1246 rushing yards as a sophomore and 1356 rushing yards as a junior. He had double digit rushing TDs in both seasons and nearly 50 receptions over that time period. Some more of Lynch's achievements:- Pac-10 Offensive Player of the Year- 2nd leading rusher in Cal history- First team All-American - school record 17 100 yard gamesThe idea that Lynch was only picked in the first round because the 2007 RB class was thin is completely ludicrous. He was the 12th overall pick! NFL teams generally don't reach 20 spots in the first round to fill a position of need. This is especially true when that position is RB, where high picks are somewhat rare and serviceable journeymen are easy to find. Lynch is a fairly typical first round RB. He would be a top 30 pick in any draft.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
since you disagree completely...Lynch had a history of being durable, never assaulted his GF, ran faster than 7 seconds in the 3 cone, and he carried a full load in college. Interesting, what planet was that on?
The guy was an impact player at Cal from day one. Everyone and their brother had him as a first round talent throughout his entire junior year. It isn't like he was a late riser or some shocking reach. Pretty much the entire world thought he'd be a first round pick. The 3 cone time? Same as Peterson's. Same as Addai's. Hardly a legitimate knock. Never carried a full load? First off, it doesn't really matter (see: Bush, McFadden, Addai). Secondly, I think you're wrong. He had 223 carries in 13 games in 2006, which extrapolates to 274 carries over a 16 game season. If that isn't a full load, then it's pretty darn close. Lynch had 1246 rushing yards as a sophomore and 1356 rushing yards as a junior. He had double digit rushing TDs in both seasons and nearly 50 receptions over that time period. Some more of Lynch's achievements:- Pac-10 Offensive Player of the Year- 2nd leading rusher in Cal history- First team All-American - school record 17 100 yard gamesThe idea that Lynch was only picked in the first round because the 2007 RB class was thin is completely ludicrous. He was the 12th overall pick! NFL teams generally don't reach 20 spots in the first round to fill a position of need. This is especially true when that position is RB, where high picks are somewhat rare and serviceable journeymen are easy to find. Lynch is a fairly typical first round RB. He would be a top 30 pick in any draft.
I would say Addai is a fair comparison to Lynch. Many thought that Addai was going to be a 2nd rounder so I am not sure why your brought him up. As for Peterson, as far as I can tell he didn't bother to complete the agility drills. Lynch combined his poor 3 cone with a poor 20 yd shuttle 4.46. This was a concern for some because Lynch's agility was supposed to be one of his strengths. I don't remember Addai having that bad of times- if you could find it I'd be interested in seeing a link. Lynch ran a 4.49 which is acceptable for a feature back, but about the same as Stewart (who is 10 lbs heavier) and not as good as Mendenhall or McFadden. The only thing that Lynch did well at the combine was the broad jump and Stewart beat him on that. If he would have had legitimate competition at RB, I think it is fair to say that he may have dropped to the bottom of the 1st/early 2nd where guys like Rice, F. Jones, and them are being projected.Lynch split carries with Fosett a little under 2 to 1. He had 40 carries less than any of the top 3 this year. He dealt with some minor injuries as well. He also was not effective at the stripe in college which was a concern for him because he wasn't a burner either.While Lynch did have a good senior season, statistically it wasn't exceptional. Playing in the same conference, JJ Arrington had CAR YDS YPC LONG TD 289 2018 7.0 89 15 compared to Lynch's:223 1356 6.1 71 11 The Bills reach all the time it's their MO. Who else would have drafted Whitner that high?anyways, this is a pointless argument because we don't know. I just like all top 3 more and it probably comes down to personal preference, but I think Stewart and Mendenhall both appear to be better at just about everything.
 
Can you tell me why you feel this way? I am extremely interested. I didn't watch a lot of Arkansas(which is why I would like more opinions) but I watched enough.
I'm basing it on more than just his college career but also his HS career. He carried the load in HS, but never really had the option in college due to McFadden. The fact that they played him as much as they did, with McFadden on the team says a lot. Watching the games, and reviewing the film, I see a guy who avoids contact, but gets positive yards everytime he has to make contact. No, he may not run over people, but he always end up falling forward. And I don't like runners that run over people, they don't last long in the NFL.
This is my take on Felix Jones.First off, the kid has very good quickness as his short shuttle time showed.
His first ten yards was one of the fastest in the past eight years at the combine. When you have that quickness and burst, you will always make positive yards.
However, I didn't see that deep speed everyone was talking about and it showed with his 40 times.8 reps at 225...Does that show his lack of work ethic to get stronger? A guy that will always be weak upper body and rely on god give talent?
We know he has the top-end speed, just watch the film. My take on the combine, I honestly don't think Felix tried that hard. Now that may be a negative characteristic. But it's hard to know why he didn't give it his all. His upper bod is considerably weaker than his lower body, but running backs don't run with their chest, they run with their legs. Also, he showed enough stiffarm in college for me to not see his bench as a detriment.
I also see a guy that benefitted greatly in the offense and that Wildcat formation. Teams focused on mcfadden and then were out of position for Jones.
Jones was very productive even when McFadden was not on the field.
He can changed direction very well and has good quickness. However, I just don't see an everydown RB that will go between the tackles at the next level or that 1st round grade Rb that everyone talked about. He is currently my 8th or 9th Rb in this class.
I've seen him 6-8 on a lot of people's lists. However, most of those were after the combine, before the combine he was much higher, usually #4. Bottom line is the kid can play, and has shown it. He can run inside, and has some of the best vision in the class. People who push him down because of the combine are probably going to regret it.AS for his upper body, they'll make him work on it in the NFL, and the beauty of that is it's not going to impact his speed at all. He's a great RB, he'll be a great pro. :goodposting:
 
since you disagree completely...

Lynch had a history of being durable, never assaulted his GF, ran faster than 7 seconds in the 3 cone, and he carried a full load in college. Interesting, what planet was that on?
The guy was an impact player at Cal from day one. Everyone and their brother had him as a first round talent throughout his entire junior year. It isn't like he was a late riser or some shocking reach. Pretty much the entire world thought he'd be a first round pick. The 3 cone time? Same as Peterson's. Same as Addai's. Hardly a legitimate knock.

Never carried a full load? First off, it doesn't really matter (see: Bush, McFadden, Addai). Secondly, I think you're wrong. He had 223 carries in 13 games in 2006, which extrapolates to 274 carries over a 16 game season. If that isn't a full load, then it's pretty darn close. Lynch had 1246 rushing yards as a sophomore and 1356 rushing yards as a junior. He had double digit rushing TDs in both seasons and nearly 50 receptions over that time period. Some more of Lynch's achievements:

- Pac-10 Offensive Player of the Year

- 2nd leading rusher in Cal history

- First team All-American

- school record 17 100 yard games

The idea that Lynch was only picked in the first round because the 2007 RB class was thin is completely ludicrous. He was the 12th overall pick! NFL teams generally don't reach 20 spots in the first round to fill a position of need. This is especially true when that position is RB, where high picks are somewhat rare and serviceable journeymen are easy to find.

Lynch is a fairly typical first round RB. He would be a top 30 pick in any draft.
To continue with this, loose circuits, Lynch probably graded higher than Stewart or Mendenhall. I certainly grade him higher than either, and should EBF and others be right about McFadden, then Lynch could be the top RB in this draft. 90% of the grade is on film, not the combine and pro days we all get too caught up in. Lynch's body of work was better than Stewart's side by side, and Mendenhall was a one year flash compared to Lynch. I rank them like this:

Peterson

McFadden

Lynch

Mendenhall/Stewert.

Not many serious Pac 10 fans are going to agree that Stewart was a more impressive player than Lynch. Lynch has some very freaky balance and power combined with great hands, toughness and lateral quicks. Peterson had the durability issues. Some worried Lynch breaks so many tackles that he set himself up for big hits, but this was a very minor issue. All RBs end up with some sort of durability issue. It is the nature of the position.

He DID NOT assault that freaky high school friend of his. It was such a bogus story, and the chick was so psycho, her own attorney dropped the case and went to the press about what liar the girl was. He had no durability issues to speak of, he had no character issues to speak of, he was spelled a little by Forsett, but not in RBBC like Stewart, nor was he a one year wonder like Mendenhall. He only failed to carry the load when Cal coaches opted to rest him, not because he was written out of the game plan like Addai and Stewart. Planet earth, btw. Sheesh. Lynch had a very high grade. There was little to question and he had no obvious flaws.

 
since you disagree completely...Lynch had a history of being durable, never assaulted his GF, ran faster than 7 seconds in the 3 cone, and he carried a full load in college. Interesting, what planet was that on?
The guy was an impact player at Cal from day one. Everyone and their brother had him as a first round talent throughout his entire junior year. It isn't like he was a late riser or some shocking reach. Pretty much the entire world thought he'd be a first round pick. The 3 cone time? Same as Peterson's. Same as Addai's. Hardly a legitimate knock. Never carried a full load? First off, it doesn't really matter (see: Bush, McFadden, Addai). Secondly, I think you're wrong. He had 223 carries in 13 games in 2006, which extrapolates to 274 carries over a 16 game season. If that isn't a full load, then it's pretty darn close. Lynch had 1246 rushing yards as a sophomore and 1356 rushing yards as a junior. He had double digit rushing TDs in both seasons and nearly 50 receptions over that time period. Some more of Lynch's achievements:- Pac-10 Offensive Player of the Year- 2nd leading rusher in Cal history- First team All-American - school record 17 100 yard gamesThe idea that Lynch was only picked in the first round because the 2007 RB class was thin is completely ludicrous. He was the 12th overall pick! NFL teams generally don't reach 20 spots in the first round to fill a position of need. This is especially true when that position is RB, where high picks are somewhat rare and serviceable journeymen are easy to find. Lynch is a fairly typical first round RB. He would be a top 30 pick in any draft.
I would say Addai is a fair comparison to Lynch. Many thought that Addai was going to be a 2nd rounder so I am not sure why your brought him up. As for Peterson, as far as I can tell he didn't bother to complete the agility drills. Lynch combined his poor 3 cone with a poor 20 yd shuttle 4.46. This was a concern for some because Lynch's agility was supposed to be one of his strengths. I don't remember Addai having that bad of times- if you could find it I'd be interested in seeing a link. Lynch ran a 4.49 which is acceptable for a feature back, but about the same as Stewart (who is 10 lbs heavier) and not as good as Mendenhall or McFadden. The only thing that Lynch did well at the combine was the broad jump and Stewart beat him on that. If he would have had legitimate competition at RB, I think it is fair to say that he may have dropped to the bottom of the 1st/early 2nd where guys like Rice, F. Jones, and them are being projected.Lynch split carries with Fosett a little under 2 to 1. He had 40 carries less than any of the top 3 this year. He dealt with some minor injuries as well. He also was not effective at the stripe in college which was a concern for him because he wasn't a burner either.While Lynch did have a good senior season, statistically it wasn't exceptional. Playing in the same conference, JJ Arrington had CAR YDS YPC LONG TD 289 2018 7.0 89 15 compared to Lynch's:223 1356 6.1 71 11 The Bills reach all the time it's their MO. Who else would have drafted Whitner that high?anyways, this is a pointless argument because we don't know. I just like all top 3 more and it probably comes down to personal preference, but I think Stewart and Mendenhall both appear to be better at just about everything.
You're placing too much weight on the measurement process. Chris Henry should have been top ten by these standards. 90% of the grade is on film.
 
I would say Addai is a fair comparison to Lynch. Many thought that Addai was going to be a 2nd rounder so I am not sure why your brought him up. As for Peterson, as far as I can tell he didn't bother to complete the agility drills. Lynch combined his poor 3 cone with a poor 20 yd shuttle 4.46. This was a concern for some because Lynch's agility was supposed to be one of his strengths. I don't remember Addai having that bad of times- if you could find it I'd be interested in seeing a link.
Three cone drill:Marshawn Lynch - 7.05Adrian Peterson - 7.09Joseph Addai - 7.0920 yard shuttle:Marshawn Lynch - 4.55Joseph Addai - 4.47Adrian Peterson - 4.40Yea, Lynch had a slow shuttle time. So did Peterson and Addai (two of the top workout warrior RBs in recent years). The shuttle is not an important drill. Lynch had a solid combine overall. Low 4.5 40, 35.5" vert, and 10'5" broad. 5'11" 215 with 20 reps on the bench. Those are good numbers in line with what you usually see from a first round RB prospect.
If he would have had legitimate competition at RB, I think it is fair to say that he may have dropped to the bottom of the 1st/early 2nd where guys like Rice, F. Jones, and them are being projected.
Late 1st? Maybe. Second round? No chance. He would be the RB4 at worst in this class. RB2 at best. His talent is comparable to that of Stewart and Mendenhall. I think Stewart has a little more athletic upside, but Lynch had a higher floor coming out.
While Lynch did have a good senior season, statistically it wasn't exceptional. Playing in the same conference, JJ Arrington had CAR YDS YPC LONG TD 289 2018 7.0 89 15 compared to Lynch's:223 1356 6.1 71 11
And yet you wouldn't find a Cal fan or a Pac-10 homer on the planet who would say Arrington was a more impressive college player than Lynch. Adimchinobe Echemandu also had a great year at Cal. That doesn't mean he's better than Lynch.
The Bills reach all the time it's their MO. Who else would have drafted Whitner that high?anyways, this is a pointless argument because we don't know. I just like all top 3 more and it probably comes down to personal preference, but I think Stewart and Mendenhall both appear to be better at just about everything.
I've got nothing against you, but when I see statements that are flat our inaccurate (Lynch is comparable in talent level to Charles and was only a first round pick because the 2007 class was weak), I can't help myself from going into attack mode. By and large, players get picked where their talent level dictates they should get picked. Team needs can bump them around a 10-15 spots. I'll admit that much, but teams don't reach for second and third round running backs in the top 15 just because they don't like the rest of the draft crop.
 
since you disagree completely...Lynch had a history of being durable, never assaulted his GF, ran faster than 7 seconds in the 3 cone, and he carried a full load in college. Interesting, what planet was that on?
The guy was an impact player at Cal from day one. Everyone and their brother had him as a first round talent throughout his entire junior year. It isn't like he was a late riser or some shocking reach. Pretty much the entire world thought he'd be a first round pick. The 3 cone time? Same as Peterson's. Same as Addai's. Hardly a legitimate knock. Never carried a full load? First off, it doesn't really matter (see: Bush, McFadden, Addai). Secondly, I think you're wrong. He had 223 carries in 13 games in 2006, which extrapolates to 274 carries over a 16 game season. If that isn't a full load, then it's pretty darn close. Lynch had 1246 rushing yards as a sophomore and 1356 rushing yards as a junior. He had double digit rushing TDs in both seasons and nearly 50 receptions over that time period. Some more of Lynch's achievements:- Pac-10 Offensive Player of the Year- 2nd leading rusher in Cal history- First team All-American - school record 17 100 yard gamesThe idea that Lynch was only picked in the first round because the 2007 RB class was thin is completely ludicrous. He was the 12th overall pick! NFL teams generally don't reach 20 spots in the first round to fill a position of need. This is especially true when that position is RB, where high picks are somewhat rare and serviceable journeymen are easy to find. Lynch is a fairly typical first round RB. He would be a top 30 pick in any draft.
I would say Addai is a fair comparison to Lynch. Many thought that Addai was going to be a 2nd rounder so I am not sure why your brought him up. As for Peterson, as far as I can tell he didn't bother to complete the agility drills. Lynch combined his poor 3 cone with a poor 20 yd shuttle 4.46. This was a concern for some because Lynch's agility was supposed to be one of his strengths. I don't remember Addai having that bad of times- if you could find it I'd be interested in seeing a link. Lynch ran a 4.49 which is acceptable for a feature back, but about the same as Stewart (who is 10 lbs heavier) and not as good as Mendenhall or McFadden. The only thing that Lynch did well at the combine was the broad jump and Stewart beat him on that. If he would have had legitimate competition at RB, I think it is fair to say that he may have dropped to the bottom of the 1st/early 2nd where guys like Rice, F. Jones, and them are being projected.Lynch split carries with Fosett a little under 2 to 1. He had 40 carries less than any of the top 3 this year. He dealt with some minor injuries as well. He also was not effective at the stripe in college which was a concern for him because he wasn't a burner either.While Lynch did have a good senior season, statistically it wasn't exceptional. Playing in the same conference, JJ Arrington had CAR YDS YPC LONG TD 289 2018 7.0 89 15 compared to Lynch's:223 1356 6.1 71 11 The Bills reach all the time it's their MO. Who else would have drafted Whitner that high?anyways, this is a pointless argument because we don't know. I just like all top 3 more and it probably comes down to personal preference, but I think Stewart and Mendenhall both appear to be better at just about everything.
You're placing too much weight on the measurement process. Chris Henry should have been top ten by these standards. 90% of the grade is on film.
'90% of the grade is on film'.Agree with this. I say your in the top 10% as far as knowledge goes on this board.Who do you like in the rook class at RB and WR that you saw on tape?Who didn't you like?
 
since you disagree completely...

Lynch had a history of being durable, never assaulted his GF, ran faster than 7 seconds in the 3 cone, and he carried a full load in college. Interesting, what planet was that on?
The guy was an impact player at Cal from day one. Everyone and their brother had him as a first round talent throughout his entire junior year. It isn't like he was a late riser or some shocking reach. Pretty much the entire world thought he'd be a first round pick. The 3 cone time? Same as Peterson's. Same as Addai's. Hardly a legitimate knock.

Never carried a full load? First off, it doesn't really matter (see: Bush, McFadden, Addai). Secondly, I think you're wrong. He had 223 carries in 13 games in 2006, which extrapolates to 274 carries over a 16 game season. If that isn't a full load, then it's pretty darn close. Lynch had 1246 rushing yards as a sophomore and 1356 rushing yards as a junior. He had double digit rushing TDs in both seasons and nearly 50 receptions over that time period. Some more of Lynch's achievements:

- Pac-10 Offensive Player of the Year

- 2nd leading rusher in Cal history

- First team All-American

- school record 17 100 yard games

The idea that Lynch was only picked in the first round because the 2007 RB class was thin is completely ludicrous. He was the 12th overall pick! NFL teams generally don't reach 20 spots in the first round to fill a position of need. This is especially true when that position is RB, where high picks are somewhat rare and serviceable journeymen are easy to find.

Lynch is a fairly typical first round RB. He would be a top 30 pick in any draft.
I would say Addai is a fair comparison to Lynch. Many thought that Addai was going to be a 2nd rounder so I am not sure why your brought him up. As for Peterson, as far as I can tell he didn't bother to complete the agility drills. Lynch combined his poor 3 cone with a poor 20 yd shuttle 4.46. This was a concern for some because Lynch's agility was supposed to be one of his strengths. I don't remember Addai having that bad of times- if you could find it I'd be interested in seeing a link. Lynch ran a 4.49 which is acceptable for a feature back, but about the same as Stewart (who is 10 lbs heavier) and not as good as Mendenhall or McFadden. The only thing that Lynch did well at the combine was the broad jump and Stewart beat him on that. If he would have had legitimate competition at RB, I think it is fair to say that he may have dropped to the bottom of the 1st/early 2nd where guys like Rice, F. Jones, and them are being projected.Lynch split carries with Fosett a little under 2 to 1. He had 40 carries less than any of the top 3 this year. He dealt with some minor injuries as well. He also was not effective at the stripe in college which was a concern for him because he wasn't a burner either.

While Lynch did have a good senior season, statistically it wasn't exceptional. Playing in the same conference, JJ Arrington had

CAR YDS YPC LONG TD

289 2018 7.0 89 15

compared to Lynch's:

223 1356 6.1 71 11

The Bills reach all the time it's their MO. Who else would have drafted Whitner that high?

anyways, this is a pointless argument because we don't know. I just like all top 3 more and it probably comes down to personal preference, but I think Stewart and Mendenhall both appear to be better at just about everything.
You're placing too much weight on the measurement process. Chris Henry should have been top ten by these standards. 90% of the grade is on film.
'90% of the grade is on film'.Agree with this. I say your in the top 10% as far as knowledge goes on this board.

Who do you like in the rook class at RB and WR that you saw on tape?

Who didn't you like?
Chaos Commish MockHTH.

 
Three cone drill:Marshawn Lynch - 7.05Adrian Peterson - 7.09Joseph Addai - 7.0920 yard shuttle:Marshawn Lynch - 4.55Joseph Addai - 4.47Adrian Peterson - 4.40Yea, Lynch had a slow shuttle time. So did Peterson and Addai (two of the top workout warrior RBs in recent years). The shuttle is not an important drill. Lynch had a solid combine overall. Low 4.5 40, 35.5" vert, and 10'5" broad. 5'11" 215 with 20 reps on the bench. Those are good numbers in line with what you usually see from a first round RB prospect.
I would be curious where you pulled those numbers from. I asked for a link. I could write down I had a 4.2 40. Just curious where you found that info is all...I'm not saying I don't believe, but I just couldn't confirm that thru google...
Late 1st? Maybe. Second round? No chance. He would be the RB4 at worst in this class. RB2 at best. His talent is comparable to that of Stewart and Mendenhall. I think Stewart has a little more athletic upside, but Lynch had a higher floor coming out.
I think Stewart has a lot more upside and I'm not seeing his floor any different then Lynch's. Curious as to what exactly seperates them in terms of probability of becoming a bust? Outside of Lynch already having a pretty decent season on a weak team.Anyways, if you are the 4th rated RB in a draft class you could always fall to the 2nd round. Especially with a strong group of guys behind you where teams could be patient and still get solid contribution from guys drafted late. If Buffalo didn't draft Lynch in the 1st round, they would have had to rely on Irons, B. Jackson, Leonard, etc...or Anthony Thomas. They further showed their desperation to shore up the RB position by burning a 4th round pick on Dwayne Wright. I think they would have been less likely to draft Lynch that high if they knew that they could get a Ray Rice, Felix Jones, Matt Forte, etc... in the 2nd round. Last years draft did not have those type of guys where you won't be punished that much for waiting.
And yet you wouldn't find a Cal fan or a Pac-10 homer on the planet who would say Arrington was a more impressive college player than Lynch. Adimchinobe Echemandu also had a great year at Cal. That doesn't mean he's better than Lynch.
I'm actually a fan of Echemandu's and think he just needs an opportunity and health on his side, but anyways...I'll agree, but I just wanted to show that Lynch's college production was not close to elite. Mendenhall and Stewart had much better production during their junior years as well I guess in your logic that doesn't mean they are any better.
I've got nothing against you, but when I see statements that are flat our inaccurate (Lynch is comparable in talent level to Charles and was only a first round pick because the 2007 class was weak), I can't help myself from going into attack mode. By and large, players get picked where their talent level dictates they should get picked. Team needs can bump them around a 10-15 spots. I'll admit that much, but teams don't reach for second and third round running backs in the top 15 just because they don't like the rest of the draft crop.
I think a big part of that misunderstanding is how you view Charles. I think Charles' upside is unlimited. I see a little Frank Gore in him mentally. The type of person that doesn't know when it's time to get tired, so they just keep fighting and running. If he can keep his head on straight, pick up the playbook, and make some correct adjustments to the way he carries the football the sky is the limit. I think a lot of Charles' NFL value is dependant on how he interviewed and his fantasy value will be dependant on what kind of job the coaching staff does developing him. Can you concede that if you take out Lynch and insert Charles or even somebody like Kevin Smith in last years draft, he's clearly the 2nd back off the board and possibly a 1st round pick based off need?
 
I think Stewart has a lot more upside and I'm not seeing his floor any different then Lynch's. Curious as to what exactly seperates them in terms of probability of becoming a bust? Outside of Lynch already having a pretty decent season on a weak team.
Lynch was a safer pick coming out. Better college career as a whole. Durability issues didn't seem as serious. Seemed to have ideal instincts and a good running style for the pro game. A lot of it is just my gut call, which is why I said "I think..." I never thought Lynch would be a bust. I see bigger bust risk with Stewart. I can't really quantify this. It's an opinion.
Anyways, if you are the 4th rated RB in a draft class you could always fall to the 2nd round.
Yes, you could, if you're a 2nd round caliber prospect. Guys with Lynch's combination of size, production, football skills, and pedigree don't slip into the 2nd round. EVERYONE had him as a first round talent, which had nothing to do with the depth in his class and everything to do with his talent IMO.
Especially with a strong group of guys behind you where teams could be patient and still get solid contribution from guys drafted late.
I don't think it happens that way. First round talents are drafted in the first round. 2006 had four first round talents, so four backs were drafted in the first round. 2007 had two first round talents, so two were drafted in the first round. This year has three or four first round talents, so three or four RBs will get drafted in the first round. Teams generally don't use this line of reasoning: "Well we need a RB badly and there's a first round guy available, so we'll let someone else take him and draft a third round guy instead." It would sort of be the FF equivalent of passing on Randy Moss in the first round because you know you can get Jerrich Cotchery in the fifth round. Teams generally don't think that way unless they absolutely fall in love with one of the lower tier guys.
If Buffalo didn't draft Lynch in the 1st round, they would have had to rely on Irons, B. Jackson, Leonard, etc...or Anthony Thomas. They further showed their desperation to shore up the RB position by burning a 4th round pick on Dwayne Wright. I think they would have been less likely to draft Lynch that high if they knew that they could get a Ray Rice, Felix Jones, Matt Forte, etc... in the 2nd round. Last years draft did not have those type of guys where you won't be punished that much for waiting.
There are any number of ways they could've shored up their RB spot. They could've acquired Jamal Lewis, Ahman Green, Chris Brown, Michael Turner, or several other veterans. They chose to take Lynch in the top 15 because they knew he was a solid first round talent who would step in and own that starting spot for them. No one put a gun to their head and made them draft a second round talent in the first round.
I just wanted to show that Lynch's college production was not close to elite.
Yea, you're right. Being the 2nd leading rusher in school history on just three seasons of work isn't elite production. Err...
Mendenhall and Stewart had much better production during their junior years as well I guess in your logic that doesn't mean they are any better.
They also each split time as sophomores and failed to crack 1,000 yards until their final season. Production is a factor to consider, but the question I ask myself is "did this guy take advantage of his opportunities?" and not "how many yards did this guy have?" Matt Forte and Kevin Smith are 2,000 yard rushers, but they are not elite pro prospects. You can't just look at yardage totals as a way to compare the talent level of prospects. It doesn't work like that.
I think a big part of that misunderstanding is how you view Charles. I think Charles' upside is unlimited. I see a little Frank Gore in him mentally. The type of person that doesn't know when it's time to get tired, so they just keep fighting and running. If he can keep his head on straight, pick up the playbook, and make some correct adjustments to the way he carries the football the sky is the limit. I think a lot of Charles' NFL value is dependant on how he interviewed and his fantasy value will be dependant on what kind of job the coaching staff does developing him.
I don't think you'll find a lot of draft pundits who will tell you that Charles is in the same class as Lynch.
Can you concede that if you take out Lynch and insert Charles or even somebody like Kevin Smith in last years draft, he's clearly the 2nd back off the board and possibly a 1st round pick based off need?
Well Charles is considered a top 50 type prospect anyway, so maybe he would've been RB2 last year. He would've been in the mix with guys like Kenny Irons and Chris Henry. But he sure as hell wouldn't have been a top 20 pick. He is closer to Tatum Bell and Julius Jones than Marshawn Lynch in terms of draft stock. A high second round type. I doubt Smith would've been a first round pick last year regardless of who else was on the board. He is a 2nd-4th round type prospect.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Stewart has a lot more upside and I'm not seeing his floor any different then Lynch's. Curious as to what exactly seperates them in terms of probability of becoming a bust? Outside of Lynch already having a pretty decent season on a weak team.
Lynch was a safer pick coming out. Better college career as a whole. Durability issues didn't seem as serious. Seemed to have ideal instincts and a good running style for the pro game. A lot of it is just my gut call, which is why I said "I think..." I never thought Lynch would be a bust. I see bigger bust risk with Stewart. I can't really quantify this. It's an opinion.
Anyways, if you are the 4th rated RB in a draft class you could always fall to the 2nd round.
Yes, you could, if you're a 2nd round caliber prospect. Guys with Lynch's combination of size, production, football skills, and pedigree don't slip into the 2nd round. EVERYONE had him as a first round talent, which had nothing to do with the depth in his class and everything to do with his talent IMO.
Especially with a strong group of guys behind you where teams could be patient and still get solid contribution from guys drafted late.
I don't think it happens that way. First round talents are drafted in the first round. 2006 had four first round talents, so four backs were drafted in the first round. 2007 had two first round talents, so two were drafted in the first round. This year has three or four first round talents, so three or four RBs will get drafted in the first round. Teams generally don't use this line of reasoning: "Well we need a RB badly and there's a first round guy available, so we'll let someone else take him and draft a third round guy instead." It would sort of be the FF equivalent of passing on Randy Moss in the first round because you know you can get Jerrich Cotchery in the fifth round. Teams generally don't think that way unless they absolutely fall in love with one of the lower tier guys.

If Buffalo didn't draft Lynch in the 1st round, they would have had to rely on Irons, B. Jackson, Leonard, etc...or Anthony Thomas. They further showed their desperation to shore up the RB position by burning a 4th round pick on Dwayne Wright. I think they would have been less likely to draft Lynch that high if they knew that they could get a Ray Rice, Felix Jones, Matt Forte, etc... in the 2nd round. Last years draft did not have those type of guys where you won't be punished that much for waiting.
There are any number of ways they could've shored up their RB spot. They could've acquired Willis McGahee, Jamal Lewis, Ahman Green, Chris Brown, Michael Turner, or several other veterans. They chose to take Lynch in the top 15 because they knew he was a solid first round talent who would step in and own that starting spot for them. No one put a gun to their head and made them draft a second round talent in the first round.
I just wanted to show that Lynch's college production was not close to elite.
Yea, you're right. Being the 2nd leading rusher in school history on just three seasons of work isn't elite production. Err...

Mendenhall and Stewart had much better production during their junior years as well I guess in your logic that doesn't mean they are any better.
They also each split time as sophomores and failed to crack 1,000 yards until their final season. Production is a factor to consider, but the question I ask myself is "did this guy take advantage of his opportunities?" and not "how many yards did this guy have?" Matt Forte and Kevin Smith are 2,000 yard rushers, but they are not elite pro prospects. You can't just look at yardage totals as a way to compare the talent level of prospects. It doesn't work like that.

I think a big part of that misunderstanding is how you view Charles. I think Charles' upside is unlimited. I see a little Frank Gore in him mentally. The type of person that doesn't know when it's time to get tired, so they just keep fighting and running. If he can keep his head on straight, pick up the playbook, and make some correct adjustments to the way he carries the football the sky is the limit. I think a lot of Charles' NFL value is dependant on how he interviewed and his fantasy value will be dependant on what kind of job the coaching staff does developing him.
I don't think you'll find a lot of draft pundits who will tell you that Charles is in the same class as Lynch.
Can you concede that if you take out Lynch and insert Charles or even somebody like Kevin Smith in last years draft, he's clearly the 2nd back off the board and possibly a 1st round pick based off need?
Well Charles is considered a top 50 type prospect anyway, so maybe he would've been RB2 last year. He would've been in the mix with guys like Kenny Irons and Chris Henry. But he sure as hell wouldn't have been a top 20 pick. He is closer to Tatum Bell and Julius Jones than Marshawn Lynch in terms of draft stock. A high second round type. I doubt Smith would've been a first round pick last year regardless of who else was on the board. He is a 2nd-4th round type prospect.
They could've acquired Willis McGahee,
Yeah, thats what the Bills should have done. :hophead:
 
2007 class

ADP, Lynch, Ahmad Bradshaw, Kenny Iron, Michael Bush, Antonio Pittman, Lorenzo Booker, Brian Leonard, Selvin Young, Tony Hunt

2008 class

McFadden, Stewart, Mendenhall, Felix Jones, Ray Rice, Chris Johnson, Kevin Smith, Jamaal Charles, Matt Forte.

Here is my question.

Does the 2008 class look soo good because we see potential?
IMO if I were to rank the RBs in the two classes on "talent" it would be:Peterson

------------------------------------

McFadden

------------------------------------

Lynch

Mendenhall

Jones

------------------------------------

Stewart

------------------------------------

Charles

Bradshaw

Rice

Slaton

------------------------------------

the rest of '07

------------------------------------

the rest of '08

If I were to rank them on NFL potential:

Peterson

------------------------------------

Lynch

Mendenhall

Jones

------------------------------------

McFadden

Stewart

------------------------------------

Slaton

Pittmann

Rice

------------------------------------

the rest of the pack altogether
As you're talking "potential", why does McFadden drop so much? If you were talking where you'd draft them, likelihood of becoming a stud, etc. I'd see the drop more easily. Usually, potential comes from talent.
 
EBF said:
I just wanted to show that Lynch's college production was not close to elite.
Yea, you're right. Being the 2nd leading rusher in school history on just three seasons of work isn't elite production. Err...
depends on the school. 2nd leading rusher school history for teams like Michigan = elite. 2nd leading rusher for TCU, not so much. California falls between the two IMO, but doesn't automatically make him elite. I can't find it, but I'd like to see where he ranks all-time, NCAA.
 
EBF said:
I just wanted to show that Lynch's college production was not close to elite.
Yea, you're right. Being the 2nd leading rusher in school history on just three seasons of work isn't elite production. Err...
depends on the school. 2nd leading rusher school history for teams like Michigan = elite. 2nd leading rusher for TCU, not so much. California falls between the two IMO, but doesn't automatically make him elite. I can't find it, but I'd like to see where he ranks all-time, NCAA.
Interesting choice, TCU...Id
 
EBF said:
I just wanted to show that Lynch's college production was not close to elite.
Yea, you're right. Being the 2nd leading rusher in school history on just three seasons of work isn't elite production. Err...
depends on the school. 2nd leading rusher school history for teams like Michigan = elite. 2nd leading rusher for TCU, not so much. California falls between the two IMO, but doesn't automatically make him elite. I can't find it, but I'd like to see where he ranks all-time, NCAA.
That won't really tell you anything. Here's the top 10:1.Ron Dayne, Wis. / 6,397 2.Ricky Williams, Texas / 6,279 3.Tony Dorsett, Pitt. / 6,082 4.Charles White, USC / 5,598 5.T. Prentice, Miami-Ohio / 5,596 6.Cedric Benson, Texas / 5,540 7.L. Tomlinson, TCU / 5,263 8.Herschel Walker, Georgia. / 5,259 9.Archie Griffin, Ohio St. / 5,177 10.D. Williams, U of Memphis / 5,145 At 3230 yards, I'd say Lynch probably isn't even in the top 50 all time.
 
EBF said:
I just wanted to show that Lynch's college production was not close to elite.
Yea, you're right. Being the 2nd leading rusher in school history on just three seasons of work isn't elite production. Err...
depends on the school. 2nd leading rusher school history for teams like Michigan = elite. 2nd leading rusher for TCU, not so much. California falls between the two IMO, but doesn't automatically make him elite. I can't find it, but I'd like to see where he ranks all-time, NCAA.
That won't really tell you anything. Here's the top 10:1.Ron Dayne, Wis. / 6,397 2.Ricky Williams, Texas / 6,279 3.Tony Dorsett, Pitt. / 6,082 4.Charles White, USC / 5,598 5.T. Prentice, Miami-Ohio / 5,596 6.Cedric Benson, Texas / 5,540 7.L. Tomlinson, TCU / 5,263 8.Herschel Walker, Georgia. / 5,259 9.Archie Griffin, Ohio St. / 5,177 10.D. Williams, U of Memphis / 5,145 At 3230 yards, I'd say Lynch probably isn't even in the top 50 all time.
Not top 50 probably means not elite. Good, maybe even great. Not elite.
 
This class is definitely deeper. Peterson and Lynch were the only two probable starters last year. Kenny Irons was the only other back drafted on the first day who looked like a potential starter to me (maybe Brandon Jackson, but he never impressed me much). This year you have three probable starters in Mendenhall, Stewart, and McFadden. Ray Rice, Felix Jones, and Chris Johnson are all possible starters who I would probably take over a fully healthy Irons. Kevin Smith, Tashard Choice, Jamaal Charles, and Matt Forte are more promising than most of the 2nd-4th round types last year. You could say Choice is a better version of Pittman, Forte is a better version of Leonard, and Charles is a better version of Booker. There are also some interesting 4th-7th round types this year. There is no elite ADP type talent in this group, but it's a much deeper class than last year's.
Very :thumbup:
 
As you're talking "potential", why does McFadden drop so much? If you were talking where you'd draft them, likelihood of becoming a stud, etc. I'd see the drop more easily. Usually, potential comes from talent.
Not always. Talented players frequently bust in the NFL.Problem is that the most talented players aren't always built to endure the NFL, take Reggie Bush for instance - his talent is among the top in the league, but he's had trouble enduring the grind of the NFL game, and his explosiveness hasn't always shown through.When I say NFL potential, I take talent, and then try to see how it fits in the rigors of what's needed to succeed in the NFL.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top