What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

UPDATE: ESPN reports Cards to name Kurt Warner starting QB (1 Viewer)

gbill2004

Footballguy
Leinart was brutal tonight (3 INT's only 3 pts on the board in first half), but Wisenhunt suggested at halftime that the receivers weren't running proper routes. When Warner came in, Warner through a nice pass to a wide open Boldin. Warner did nothing special, but he did open up the running lanes, and the Cardinals put up a quick 2 TDs on the ground.

Is Warner now the starter game 1, or is Wisenhunt going to be stuborn and stick with Leinart?

I have Warner on my team, but I think if the Cardinals want to win this year, Warner needs to start.

UPDATE/EDIT:

Aug 23 Warner may have claimed the top spot on Arizona's depth chart because Matt Leinart struggled badly on Saturday.

Recommendation: Leinart completed 4-of-12 passes for 24 yards and three interceptions. Warner was 2-of-4 for 40 yards. Warner won't have a lot of job security, but he will probably take over as the starter.
UPDATE/EDIT #2:
Source: Cardinals set to name QB Warner as starter

By Chris Mortensen

ESPN.com

Updated: August 24, 2008, 11:46 AM ET

The Arizona Cardinals are expected to name Kurt Warner as the team's starting quarterback, a team source said Sunday.

Matt Leinart's poor perfomance Saturday night against the Oakland Raiders probably sealed the decision.

Leinart had three interceptions in the first half and completed just 4 of 12 passes for 24 yards. His passer rating was 2.8. The Cardinals won the game 24-0.

The source said Leinart's training-camp performance has been uneven, and the Cardinals are concerned about his arm strength and consistency.

After the game, coach Ken Whisenhunt said Leinart was still in the running for the Cardinals' starting job.

"I know Matt's down because he didn't play as well as he would have liked," Whisenhunt said. "This competition, being pushed by Kurt, has made Matt tougher. It's one of the things you have to be as a quarterback."
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3551359
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Warner. The only question now is how many rounds does Warner move up in drafts?

ETA: If Warner is indeed the starter (which I would be shocked if he wasn't), there is no reason why anyone should have have ranked below Derrick Anderson.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Same as it was before:

Leinart to start, on a shortleash with Warner waiting in the wings. Leinart is the starter and has been the starter and will only lose the job during the regular season or an injury during the preseason.

 
If Leinart is still the starter, then Whisenhunt doesn't want to win football games.

Back to the coordinator ranks you go Whizzy!

 
If Leinart is still the starter, then Whisenhunt doesn't want to win football games.
Search through a zillion posts on here and you'll see how many people post about how preseason doesn't count. Although you want your players to look sharp, you cannot bench your future QB on the basis of a preseason game. You might mentally tighten up the leash, but all of a sudden in a night you don't just yank the rug out from under this guy and throw a wrench into the entire offense..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Leinart is still the starter, then Whisenhunt doesn't want to win football games.
Search through a zillion posts on here and you'll see how many people post about how preseason doesn't count. Although you want your players to look sharp, you cannot bench your future QB on the basis of a preseason game. You might mentally tighten up the leash, but all of a sudden in a night you don't just yank the rug out from under this guy and throw a wrench into the entire offense..
Hate to say it, but I agree that this is what will happen. Not what should happen, but what will happen.
 
If Leinart is still the starter, then Whisenhunt doesn't want to win football games.
Search through a zillion posts on here and you'll see how many people post about how preseason doesn't count. Although you want your players to look sharp, you cannot bench your future QB on the basis of a preseason game. You might mentally tighten up the leash, but all of a sudden in a night you don't just yank the rug out from under this guy and throw a wrench into the entire offense..
The preseason is a big giant audition for roster spots and starting jobs. What has Leinart done to win that starting job other than being the #10 pick in the draft in 2006?Arizona has said there would be a competition for the job. If Leinart is still the starter, then there was never a competition.
 
Warner or St. Pierre over Leinart.
Come on, Routilla. You really think Leinart is 3rd string after tonight's preseason game?
He looks lost. From a production standpoint he was 3rd best tonight, which equates to worst since there are only 3 subjects for comparison. But yes he is probably not 3rd QB. AZ mgmt would have to acknowledge that Leinart is a bust if he were dropped to 3rd string and no way they will eat crow like that.
 
If Leinart is still the starter, then Whisenhunt doesn't want to win football games.
Search through a zillion posts on here and you'll see how many people post about how preseason doesn't count. Although you want your players to look sharp, you cannot bench your future QB on the basis of a preseason game. You might mentally tighten up the leash, but all of a sudden in a night you don't just yank the rug out from under this guy and throw a wrench into the entire offense..
i wouldnt say it would throw a wrench into the offense. Warner was much more effective than Leinart last season with the same offense, and Leinart hasnt really seperated himself in preseason either. I do get that you dont want to bench what you hope is your franchise QB because he had a bad preseason game, but that passing offense just seems a lot scarier with Warner behind center. I think Leinart goes into the season as the starter, but with a short leash
 
Leinart looked as bad as a QB can look. That was awful.
You must have missed Vince Young then last game.
In fact I did, but we don't need another Leinart-Young debate here, do we?
No, we don't.I'm just saying he played poorly but he's not getting benched for a preseason performance. Yes, the coaches are sitting together talking about what if's this season, but the what if isn't about whether or not Leinart or Warner are starting the season.....it's more how much of a leash do we give him during the regular season.

 
If Leinart is still the starter, then Whisenhunt doesn't want to win football games.
Search through a zillion posts on here and you'll see how many people post about how preseason doesn't count. Although you want your players to look sharp, you cannot bench your future QB on the basis of a preseason game. You might mentally tighten up the leash, but all of a sudden in a night you don't just yank the rug out from under this guy and throw a wrench into the entire offense..
I guess technically the Jags did not bench Leftwich, they just cut him.
 
Wrench in the offense? I imagine if you asked Edge, Fitz, and Boldin who they wanted to QB, the answer would be Warner. If you want the offense to work, if you want to put points on the board, you start Warner. If you want to continue being a running joke in the NFL, you start Leinart. Their division is up for grabs. Start Warner if you're serious about this football thing.

 
If Leinart is still the starter, then Whisenhunt doesn't want to win football games.
Search through a zillion posts on here and you'll see how many people post about how preseason doesn't count. Although you want your players to look sharp, you cannot bench your future QB on the basis of a preseason game. You might mentally tighten up the leash, but all of a sudden in a night you don't just yank the rug out from under this guy and throw a wrench into the entire offense..
You do if the wrench actually fixes your offense!
 
If Leinart is still the starter, then Whisenhunt doesn't want to win football games.
Search through a zillion posts on here and you'll see how many people post about how preseason doesn't count. Although you want your players to look sharp, you cannot bench your future QB on the basis of a preseason game. You might mentally tighten up the leash, but all of a sudden in a night you don't just yank the rug out from under this guy and throw a wrench into the entire offense..
i wouldnt say it would throw a wrench into the offense. Warner was much more effective than Leinart last season with the same offense, and Leinart hasnt really seperated himself in preseason either. I do get that you dont want to bench what you hope is your franchise QB because he had a bad preseason game, but that passing offense just seems a lot scarier with Warner behind center. I think Leinart goes into the season as the starter, but with a short leash
Agreed, except I do think it's a wrench. The wrench isn't what they do this year, but how long do you think Warner is The Guy? What do you do next draft with Leinart on the team if you don't give him a shot?You give Leinart every reasonable chance to start the season, if he can't, then you have to go with Warner and hope he can somehow come back and win the job on his own. If you're a Cardinal fan, you hope Lienart steps up right off the bat and plays well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm the first to say people often overreact to preseason numbers, but in this case I think where there's smoke, there's fire. 4-of-12 with 3 INTs is horrible, and if you watched the game, I'm sure you agree he looked as bad as his stats suggest. He was slow, tentative and some of his throws were NOWHERE near on the mark.

 
Agreed, except I do think it's a wrench. The wrench isn't what they do this year, but how long do you think Warner is The Guy? What do you do next draft with Leinart on the team if you don't give him a shot?You give Leinart every reasonable chance to start the season, if he can't, then you have to go with Warner and hope he can somehow come back and win the job on his own. If you're a Cardinal fan, you hope Lienart steps up right off the bat and plays well.
There is no way Martz/Nolan won't bite if they dangle him toward San Fran. Just move on.There's gotta be a point that a team moves on before the player loses all trade value. Every pick can't "pan out" etc(as you know)I think Leinart gone might even boost the team a bit like getting Leftwich out of Jax. Next year? Sign a FA, draft another...worry about that next year. It can't be hard to attract a QB to throw to Fitz and Boldin and play in a nice climate. They'll just have to spend some $.Hey Cowboys fan, remember Dave Brown? How long did the Giants cling to hopes he'd pan out? Yeah you probably have some fond memories of that :thumbdown: Oh Leinart's not Brown but, there's gotta be a time to move on
 
I've had Warner projected as the starter all along. This awful showing by Leinart only confirms my beliefs that he isn't a good QB. No chance that I touch Leinart in any draft. Only thing that sucks is that Warner will be moving up a lot now in any remaining drafts.

 
Sun, Aug 24 The Associated Press reports Arizona Cardinals head coach Ken Whisenhunt said QB Matt Leinart's shaky game Saturday, Aug. 23, against the Oakland Raiders won't change his lead over QB Kurt Warner for the team's No. 1 quarterback position. "This competition, being pushed by Kurt, has made Matt tougher. It's one of the things you have to be as a quarterback." Leinart tossed three interceptions in less than two quarters of play.
Trying to keep up trade value?
 
Sun, Aug 24 The Associated Press reports Arizona Cardinals head coach Ken Whisenhunt said QB Matt Leinart's shaky game Saturday, Aug. 23, against the Oakland Raiders won't change his lead over QB Kurt Warner for the team's No. 1 quarterback position. "This competition, being pushed by Kurt, has made Matt tougher. It's one of the things you have to be as a quarterback." Leinart tossed three interceptions in less than two quarters of play.
Trying to keep up trade value?
Ridiculous.Leinart MIGHT keep his job for a few games because Arizona starts with SF and Miami, two winnable games. But if they lose both those games, and Leinart performs poorly in leading to those losses, Whisenhunt should be fired.
 
Sun, Aug 24 The Associated Press reports Arizona Cardinals head coach Ken Whisenhunt said QB Matt Leinart's shaky game Saturday, Aug. 23, against the Oakland Raiders won't change his lead over QB Kurt Warner for the team's No. 1 quarterback position. "This competition, being pushed by Kurt, has made Matt tougher. It's one of the things you have to be as a quarterback." Leinart tossed three interceptions in less than two quarters of play.
Trying to keep up trade value?
The QB "competition", was obviously never really a competition :goodposting: What a joke...
 
From a fantasy standpoint, starting Warner seems to be a no-brainer. However it also seems that when they start him, they have an 8-win ceiling as to the maximum amount of games they can win. He'll start off strong but then slowly show his age as the season goes on.

So if Warner ends up starting, it's better for Fitzgerald, Boldin and even Edge owners, but I think the team really, really, really, wants Leinart to succeed as the starter. I expect him to have a longer leash this year and start the season as the starter.

 
Wrench in the offense? I imagine if you asked Edge, Fitz, and Boldin who they wanted to QB, the answer would be Warner. If you want the offense to work, if you want to put points on the board, you start Warner. If you want to continue being a running joke in the NFL, you start Leinart. Their division is up for grabs. Start Warner if you're serious about this football thing.
I wonder if people with this position thought Green Bay was right to want to start a green high round draft pick over arguably one of the best QB's the NFL has produced?Just wondering.
 
Why would they give him a LONGER leash then they gave him last year. He had two games last year before they turned to Kurt to save the season. I honeslty believe that it is a competition this year in preseason, and Kurt just won. I think Kurt gets named the starter and Matt watches and waits for an injury or preseason 2009. Remember, Wishenhut has a job on the line. I think he is being judged on a trip to the playoffs this year, not on if he can make Matt a funtional QB option.

 
Wrench in the offense? I imagine if you asked Edge, Fitz, and Boldin who they wanted to QB, the answer would be Warner. If you want the offense to work, if you want to put points on the board, you start Warner. If you want to continue being a running joke in the NFL, you start Leinart. Their division is up for grabs. Start Warner if you're serious about this football thing.
I wonder if people with this position thought Green Bay was right to want to start a green high round draft pick over arguably one of the best QB's the NFL has produced?Just wondering.
Aaron Rodgers can produce at the NFL level. Leinart simply can not. It's not even a close comparison.
 
Why would they give him a LONGER leash then they gave him last year. He had two games last year before they turned to Kurt to save the season. I honeslty believe that it is a competition this year in preseason, and Kurt just won. I think Kurt gets named the starter and Matt watches and waits for an injury or preseason 2009. Remember, Wishenhut has a job on the line. I think he is being judged on a trip to the playoffs this year, not on if he can make Matt a funtional QB option.
Because he's supposed to be the future of the franchise?
 
Why would they give him a LONGER leash then they gave him last year. He had two games last year before they turned to Kurt to save the season. I honeslty believe that it is a competition this year in preseason, and Kurt just won. I think Kurt gets named the starter and Matt watches and waits for an injury or preseason 2009. Remember, Wishenhut has a job on the line. I think he is being judged on a trip to the playoffs this year, not on if he can make Matt a funtional QB option.
Because he's supposed to be the future of the franchise?
He was supposed to be the future of the franchise. This is his third season in the NFL, and his second training camp. If Leinart is ever going to be a franchise QB, he should be showing it by now. He is not accurate, decisive, nor explosive, and not even a good game manager.It's more like the Cards wish he could be the future of the franchise. Well, the only advice I have for the Cards is for them to wish in one hand and crap in the other. Then let them see which hand fills up first.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why would they give him a LONGER leash then they gave him last year. He had two games last year before they turned to Kurt to save the season. I honeslty believe that it is a competition this year in preseason, and Kurt just won. I think Kurt gets named the starter and Matt watches and waits for an injury or preseason 2009. Remember, Wishenhut has a job on the line. I think he is being judged on a trip to the playoffs this year, not on if he can make Matt a funtional QB option.
Because he's supposed to be the future of the franchise?
He was supposed to be the future of the franchise. This is his third season in the NFL, and his second training camp. If Leinart is ever going to be a franchise QB, he should be showing it by now. He is not accurate, decisive, nor explosive, and not even a good game manager.It's more like the Cards wish he could be the future of the franchise. Well, the only advice I have for the Cards is for them to wish in one hand and crap in the other. Then let them see which hand fills up first.
If, after this abysmal performance, Whisenhut starts Leinart, he has bet his whole future on Leinart.Never draw to an inside straight.

 
halfway through second qtr i ran to computer and put in to pick up warner...leinart was TERRIBLE, almost completed as many to raiders as he did to his team...speaking of vince, that is who i dropped for warner...go warner

 
Why would they give him a LONGER leash then they gave him last year. He had two games last year before they turned to Kurt to save the season. I honeslty believe that it is a competition this year in preseason, and Kurt just won. I think Kurt gets named the starter and Matt watches and waits for an injury or preseason 2009. Remember, Wishenhut has a job on the line. I think he is being judged on a trip to the playoffs this year, not on if he can make Matt a funtional QB option.
Because he's supposed to be the future of the franchise?
You mean like Ryan Leaf? In fact, wasn't Leaf taken 2nd and Matt 10th?You mean like Akili Smith?You mean like Tim Couch?
 
Why would they give him a LONGER leash then they gave him last year. He had two games last year before they turned to Kurt to save the season. I honeslty believe that it is a competition this year in preseason, and Kurt just won. I think Kurt gets named the starter and Matt watches and waits for an injury or preseason 2009. Remember, Wishenhut has a job on the line. I think he is being judged on a trip to the playoffs this year, not on if he can make Matt a funtional QB option.
Because he's supposed to be the future of the franchise?
He was supposed to be the future of the franchise. This is his third season in the NFL, and his second training camp. If Leinart is ever going to be a franchise QB, he should be showing it by now. He is not accurate, decisive, nor explosive, and not even a good game manager.It's more like the Cards wish he could be the future of the franchise. Well, the only advice I have for the Cards is for them to wish in one hand and crap in the other. Then let them see which hand fills up first.
He's only started 16 games in his career. Since when are we so critical of inexperienced QB's? So he had a horrible performance last night. Whippity-doo. Here's a comparison of Peyton Manning's first 16 starts and Matt Leinart's first 16 starts:Peyton Manning 326 for 575, 3739 yards, 26 TD's, 28 INT's, 6.5 YPA

Matt Leinart: 274 for 489, 3194 yards, 13 TD's, 16 INT's, 6.5 YPA

Now, I'm NOT saying Matt Leinart is on par with Peyton Manning. However, his stats so far haven't been too bad. He just needs to put the game tape time in and get some more starts under his belt and he'll have every opportunity to succeed.

It's the pre-season everyone. Let's slow down a bit. Three picks isn't good in any game obviously, but remember, he hasn't played since Week 5 of last year. There's likely some rust he needs to shake off before we can get an accurate representation of where his progression is going.

 
Why would they give him a LONGER leash then they gave him last year. He had two games last year before they turned to Kurt to save the season. I honeslty believe that it is a competition this year in preseason, and Kurt just won. I think Kurt gets named the starter and Matt watches and waits for an injury or preseason 2009. Remember, Wishenhut has a job on the line. I think he is being judged on a trip to the playoffs this year, not on if he can make Matt a funtional QB option.
Because he's supposed to be the future of the franchise?
You mean like Ryan Leaf? In fact, wasn't Leaf taken 2nd and Matt 10th?You mean like Akili Smith?You mean like Tim Couch?
Uhh..Ryan Leaf: 21 starts - 48.4 % completion percentage, 14 TD’s, 36 INT’sAkili Smith: 17 starts - 46.6% completion percentage, 5 TD’s, 13 INT’sI don’t get where your coming from with those comparisons. Could you please elaborate?As for Tim Couch, I wouldn’t call him a bust. He was a starter in the league for 5 years. Was he disappointing? Yes. A bust? Not so much.
 
If Leinart is still the starter, then Whisenhunt doesn't want to win football games.Back to the coordinator ranks you go Whizzy!
Is Leinart possibly this bad? I dont think he is. He certainly struggles against OAK. Wisehunt better support him 100% htis week: or DEMOTE him to 3rd string
 
Why would they give him a LONGER leash then they gave him last year. He had two games last year before they turned to Kurt to save the season. I honeslty believe that it is a competition this year in preseason, and Kurt just won. I think Kurt gets named the starter and Matt watches and waits for an injury or preseason 2009. Remember, Wishenhut has a job on the line. I think he is being judged on a trip to the playoffs this year, not on if he can make Matt a funtional QB option.
Because he's supposed to be the future of the franchise?
He was supposed to be the future of the franchise. This is his third season in the NFL, and his second training camp. If Leinart is ever going to be a franchise QB, he should be showing it by now. He is not accurate, decisive, nor explosive, and not even a good game manager.It's more like the Cards wish he could be the future of the franchise. Well, the only advice I have for the Cards is for them to wish in one hand and crap in the other. Then let them see which hand fills up first.
He's only started 16 games in his career. Since when are we so critical of inexperienced QB's? So he had a horrible performance last night. Whippity-doo. Here's a comparison of Peyton Manning's first 16 starts and Matt Leinart's first 16 starts:Peyton Manning 326 for 575, 3739 yards, 26 TD's, 28 INT's, 6.5 YPA

Matt Leinart: 274 for 489, 3194 yards, 13 TD's, 16 INT's, 6.5 YPA

Now, I'm NOT saying Matt Leinart is on par with Peyton Manning. However, his stats so far haven't been too bad. He just needs to put the game tape time in and get some more starts under his belt and he'll have every opportunity to succeed.

It's the pre-season everyone. Let's slow down a bit. Three picks isn't good in any game obviously, but remember, he hasn't played since Week 5 of last year. There's likely some rust he needs to shake off before we can get an accurate representation of where his progression is going.
How many starts has Aaron Rodgers had so far? Yet, he's already showing himself to be a competent and productive QB. How many starts did Phillip Rivers have before 2006? He showed himself to be a productive QB his first year starting. Jay Cutler showed he was going to be the franchise QB after his first five starts. Peyton Manning finished in (or near) the top 10 his first year starting. Leinart can't even hold a candle to Peyton.So, he has 16 starts and two training camps. He should be looking a heck of a lot better than he has this preseason. Leinart is showing himself to be nothing more than a piece of entitled trash.

 
Why would they give him a LONGER leash then they gave him last year. He had two games last year before they turned to Kurt to save the season. I honeslty believe that it is a competition this year in preseason, and Kurt just won. I think Kurt gets named the starter and Matt watches and waits for an injury or preseason 2009. Remember, Wishenhut has a job on the line. I think he is being judged on a trip to the playoffs this year, not on if he can make Matt a funtional QB option.
Because he's supposed to be the future of the franchise?
He was supposed to be the future of the franchise. This is his third season in the NFL, and his second training camp. If Leinart is ever going to be a franchise QB, he should be showing it by now. He is not accurate, decisive, nor explosive, and not even a good game manager.It's more like the Cards wish he could be the future of the franchise. Well, the only advice I have for the Cards is for them to wish in one hand and crap in the other. Then let them see which hand fills up first.
He's only started 16 games in his career. Since when are we so critical of inexperienced QB's? So he had a horrible performance last night. Whippity-doo. Here's a comparison of Peyton Manning's first 16 starts and Matt Leinart's first 16 starts:Peyton Manning 326 for 575, 3739 yards, 26 TD's, 28 INT's, 6.5 YPA

Matt Leinart: 274 for 489, 3194 yards, 13 TD's, 16 INT's, 6.5 YPA

Now, I'm NOT saying Matt Leinart is on par with Peyton Manning. However, his stats so far haven't been too bad. He just needs to put the game tape time in and get some more starts under his belt and he'll have every opportunity to succeed.

It's the pre-season everyone. Let's slow down a bit. Three picks isn't good in any game obviously, but remember, he hasn't played since Week 5 of last year. There's likely some rust he needs to shake off before we can get an accurate representation of where his progression is going.
How many starts has Aaron Rodgers had so far? Yet, he's already showing himself to be a competent and productive QB. How many starts did Phillip Rivers have before 2006? He showed himself to be a productive QB his first year starting. Jay Cutler showed he was going to be the franchise QB after his first five starts. Peyton Manning finished in (or near) the top 10 his first year starting. Leinart can't even hold a candle to Peyton.So, he has 16 starts and two training camps. He should be looking a heck of a lot better than he has this preseason. Leinart is showing himself to be nothing more than a piece of entitled trash.
First off, I'm in no way saying I think Leinart will be good. In fact, I think he has an affinity for game tape studying that is going to be his downfall. You bring up some good points as to Rodgers and Rivers and Cutler. Although, Rodgers has just shown competency in the pre-season. I know, I know, Weeks 3 and 4 of the pre-season are a lot closer to actual games than Weeks 1 and 2 are but I'm waiting to form my opinion on Rodgers until I see how he performs as the actual starter.

But as we have learned from football time and time again, it takes some players a bit longer to adjust than others. Look at Drew Brees -- he wasn't what you would call a quality QB his first three years in the league but he's turned into one of the top 5 in the entire NFL.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why would they give him a LONGER leash then they gave him last year. He had two games last year before they turned to Kurt to save the season. I honeslty believe that it is a competition this year in preseason, and Kurt just won. I think Kurt gets named the starter and Matt watches and waits for an injury or preseason 2009. Remember, Wishenhut has a job on the line. I think he is being judged on a trip to the playoffs this year, not on if he can make Matt a funtional QB option.
Because he's supposed to be the future of the franchise?
He was supposed to be the future of the franchise. This is his third season in the NFL, and his second training camp. If Leinart is ever going to be a franchise QB, he should be showing it by now. He is not accurate, decisive, nor explosive, and not even a good game manager.It's more like the Cards wish he could be the future of the franchise. Well, the only advice I have for the Cards is for them to wish in one hand and crap in the other. Then let them see which hand fills up first.
He's only started 16 games in his career. Since when are we so critical of inexperienced QB's? So he had a horrible performance last night. Whippity-doo. Here's a comparison of Peyton Manning's first 16 starts and Matt Leinart's first 16 starts:Peyton Manning 326 for 575, 3739 yards, 26 TD's, 28 INT's, 6.5 YPA

Matt Leinart: 274 for 489, 3194 yards, 13 TD's, 16 INT's, 6.5 YPA

Now, I'm NOT saying Matt Leinart is on par with Peyton Manning. However, his stats so far haven't been too bad. He just needs to put the game tape time in and get some more starts under his belt and he'll have every opportunity to succeed.

It's the pre-season everyone. Let's slow down a bit. Three picks isn't good in any game obviously, but remember, he hasn't played since Week 5 of last year. There's likely some rust he needs to shake off before we can get an accurate representation of where his progression is going.
I understand what you're trying to say, but Peyton's 16 starts came in his FIRST year and we're not heading into Leinart's 3rd year. QB's are supposed to benefit from sitting behind a starter and learning. He really should be looking much more polished than he is now. Also, stats are one thing and then there's just how it looks on the field. Leinart has yet to resemble anything that Peyton did, even in his 1st year. Point is, if he looked like this in his 1st year, he'd get a pass. He was on a short leash last year, but even in his 2nd year, I could see allowing some leeway. Heading into his 3rd year and being given a chance to take the starting job, he's simply not getting it done. It's ok to have a bad game like he just had if there were something else to indicate some signs of improvement or promise and that just hasn't appeared, at least not in what we've seen.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top