What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty Rookie #14 (1 Viewer)

Who is the #14 rookie in FF?

  • Brandon Pettigrew

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • James Davis

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Javon Ringer

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Rashad Jennings

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Juaquin Iglesias

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Jarett Dillard

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    0
jeter23

jeter23

Footballguy
For those of you who own the 2.02 (14) rookie pick in your dynasty league, or those that would like to own it, who are you taking?

Feel free to take your league rules and other details into account, as they are not specified. PPR, scarcity of RBs and obviously, team need would affect each vote.

1.01 Michael Crabtree, WR 38% (Moreno, 27%)

1.02 Knowshon Moreno, RB 62% (Wells, 17%)

1.03 Chris Wells, RB 45% (McCoy, 35%)

1.04 LeSean McCoy, RB 71% (Greene, 17%)

1.05 Shonn Greene, RB 52% (Maclin, 21%)

1.06 Jeremy Maclin, WR 58% (Harvin, 19%)

1.07 Percy Harvin, WR 44% (Brown, 17%)

1.08 Donald Brown, RB 40% (Stafford, 29%)

1.09 Darius Heyward-Bey, WR 34% (Stafford, 32%)

1.10 Matt Stafford, QB 43% (Britt, 24%)

1.11 Kenny Britt, WR 34% (Sanchez, 18%)

1.12 Hakeen Nicks, WR 50% (Sanchez, 15%)

2.01 Matt Sanchez, QB 36% (Jennings, 23%)

 
love the polls, so please don't be insulted, but since when did every league become a 12 team league?

 
FUBAR said:
love the polls, so please don't be insulted, but since when did every league become a 12 team league?
Click to expand...
What, he should set up a poll for every size league?12's undoubtedly the most common sized league, I'd say.It's not hard to do the math...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FUBAR said:
love the polls, so please don't be insulted, but since when did every league become a 12 team league?
Click to expand...
Hey FUBAR, no insult taken at all. Since I set this up as poll or "who would you draft?" rather than just ranking the rookies, I had to go with one league size and I assumed that 12 teamers are the most common. I do play in 8, 10, 14 and 16 team leagues, but I think 12 is the most common.
 
I'm not liking anyone left all that much. Took Dillard but i'm not too sold on him.

 
awesomeness said:
I'm not liking anyone left all that much. Took Dillard but i'm not too sold on him.
Click to expand...
After Jennings, I'd go with Iglesias.I would imagine Jeremiah Johnson, Brian Robiskie, James Casey may be at the top of some peoples' lists of RBs, WRs, and TEs, respectively.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not that I think he will be off the board very quickly should Freeman be on the list to create a QB option?

If Jennings comes off the board this is were my RB rankings start to become muddled I could see Moore, Sutton or Johnson being the next up at this point.

Is Williams stock going down? Should he be the 3rd WR option before Robiskie is added?

Are we getting to the point where 2 TE's could be listed? Is there that much support for anyone leapfrogging Pettigrew?

 
jeter23 said:
FUBAR said:
love the polls, so please don't be insulted, but since when did every league become a 12 team league?
Click to expand...
Hey FUBAR, no insult taken at all. Since I set this up as poll or "who would you draft?" rather than just ranking the rookies, I had to go with one league size and I assumed that 12 teamers are the most common. I do play in 8, 10, 14 and 16 team leagues, but I think 12 is the most common.
Click to expand...
your logic makes sense, but do we then assume we have the 1.01 and 2.01? FWIW, I don't think I've ever had the same # pick throughout a draft (I always trade a bit)
 
I find it hard not to value Pettigrew in this area. Like it or not, someone wants to take a chance on the only promising TE in the draft around here.

 
FUBAR said:
jeter23 said:
FUBAR said:
love the polls, so please don't be insulted, but since when did every league become a 12 team league?
Click to expand...
Hey FUBAR, no insult taken at all. Since I set this up as poll or "who would you draft?" rather than just ranking the rookies, I had to go with one league size and I assumed that 12 teamers are the most common. I do play in 8, 10, 14 and 16 team leagues, but I think 12 is the most common.
Click to expand...
your logic makes sense, but do we then assume we have the 1.01 and 2.01? FWIW, I don't think I've ever had the same # pick throughout a draft (I always trade a bit)
Click to expand...
I was not looking at this as "I have 1.01 and 2.01" just if you had that one pick in the draft, who would you take? I am not letting who I voted for at 1.01 affect who I voted for at 2.01, and I doubt anyone else is either.
 
jeter23 said:
FUBAR said:
jeter23 said:
FUBAR said:
love the polls, so please don't be insulted, but since when did every league become a 12 team league?
Click to expand...
Hey FUBAR, no insult taken at all. Since I set this up as poll or "who would you draft?" rather than just ranking the rookies, I had to go with one league size and I assumed that 12 teamers are the most common. I do play in 8, 10, 14 and 16 team leagues, but I think 12 is the most common.
Click to expand...
your logic makes sense, but do we then assume we have the 1.01 and 2.01? FWIW, I don't think I've ever had the same # pick throughout a draft (I always trade a bit)
Click to expand...
I was not looking at this as "I have 1.01 and 2.01" just if you had that one pick in the draft, who would you take? I am not letting who I voted for at 1.01 affect who I voted for at 2.01, and I doubt anyone else is either.
Click to expand...
I agree with Jeter here, this is kind of getting off topic by the way. In something else off topic, Jeter would you mind if I start a new poll (a separate spin off) to include IDPs in the IDP forum but use your first 14 picks since I don't see any IDPs going up to this point.
 
Chachi said:
jeter23 said:
FUBAR said:
jeter23 said:
FUBAR said:
love the polls, so please don't be insulted, but since when did every league become a 12 team league?
Click to expand...
Hey FUBAR, no insult taken at all. Since I set this up as poll or "who would you draft?" rather than just ranking the rookies, I had to go with one league size and I assumed that 12 teamers are the most common. I do play in 8, 10, 14 and 16 team leagues, but I think 12 is the most common.
Click to expand...
your logic makes sense, but do we then assume we have the 1.01 and 2.01? FWIW, I don't think I've ever had the same # pick throughout a draft (I always trade a bit)
Click to expand...
I was not looking at this as "I have 1.01 and 2.01" just if you had that one pick in the draft, who would you take? I am not letting who I voted for at 1.01 affect who I voted for at 2.01, and I doubt anyone else is either.
Click to expand...
I agree with Jeter here, this is kind of getting off topic by the way. In something else off topic, Jeter would you mind if I start a new poll (a separate spin off) to include IDPs in the IDP forum but use your first 14 picks since I don't see any IDPs going up to this point.
Click to expand...
Not at all, enjoy. :unsure:
 
MAC_32 said:
lyon812 said:
I find it hard not to value Pettigrew in this area. Like it or not, someone wants to take a chance on the only promising TE in the draft around here.
Click to expand...
I do not think Pettigrew is the #1 fantasy TE this year.
Click to expand...
You won't be alone in this thinking. Pettigrew is a tremendous talent, but more in the mold of Daniel Graham. There may be at least a few prospects with better receiving skills.
 
awesomeness said:
MAC_32 said:
lyon812 said:
I find it hard not to value Pettigrew in this area. Like it or not, someone wants to take a chance on the only promising TE in the draft around here.
Click to expand...
I do not think Pettigrew is the #1 fantasy TE this year.
Click to expand...
:lmao:He's top in my top 3 at TE.
Click to expand...
Of course he won't be the #1 fantasy TE, but he's complete. Great size, good hands, ferocious blocker, operates strongly as an underneath option. Some people say he's Daniel Graham. Some say he's Jason Witten. I think he's more towards the latter than the former, even if he won't be as good. Mind you, it depends on what team drafts him, but that's always the case. I suspect that he'll go to a team that needs/desires a TE that will be utilized immediately. Conversely, Coffman and co. should go later, and possibly have to fight for PT. As such, at this point in the draft, Pettigrew's a good value. I think he'll surprise more people than he'll disappoint.
 
lyon812 said:
awesomeness said:
MAC_32 said:
lyon812 said:
I find it hard not to value Pettigrew in this area. Like it or not, someone wants to take a chance on the only promising TE in the draft around here.
Click to expand...
I do not think Pettigrew is the #1 fantasy TE this year.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:He's top in my top 3 at TE.
Click to expand...
Of course he won't be the #1 fantasy TE, but he's complete. Great size, good hands, ferocious blocker, operates strongly as an underneath option. Some people say he's Daniel Graham. Some say he's Jason Witten. I think he's more towards the latter than the former, even if he won't be as good. Mind you, it depends on what team drafts him, but that's always the case. I suspect that he'll go to a team that needs/desires a TE that will be utilized immediately. Conversely, Coffman and co. should go later, and possibly have to fight for PT. As such, at this point in the draft, Pettigrew's a good value. I think he'll surprise more people than he'll disappoint.
Click to expand...
i'll agree with that. Pettigrew is the safest TE prospect in this draft. Personally, i prefer to draft a guy with a higher FF potential than a safer prospect.
 
lyon812 said:
Of course he won't be the #1 fantasy TE, but he's complete. Great size, good hands, ferocious blocker, operates strongly as an underneath option. Some people say he's Daniel Graham. Some say he's Jason Witten. I think he's more towards the latter than the former, even if he won't be as good. Mind you, it depends on what team drafts him, but that's always the case. I suspect that he'll go to a team that needs/desires a TE that will be utilized immediately. Conversely, Coffman and co. should go later, and possibly have to fight for PT. As such, at this point in the draft, Pettigrew's a good value. I think he'll surprise more people than he'll disappoint.
Click to expand...
I'm seeing Buffalo taking Pettigrew - that could be a sweet set up for him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
awesomeness said:
lyon812 said:
awesomeness said:
MAC_32 said:
lyon812 said:
I find it hard not to value Pettigrew in this area. Like it or not, someone wants to take a chance on the only promising TE in the draft around here.
Click to expand...
I do not think Pettigrew is the #1 fantasy TE this year.
Click to expand...
:goodposting:He's top in my top 3 at TE.
Click to expand...
Of course he won't be the #1 fantasy TE, but he's complete. Great size, good hands, ferocious blocker, operates strongly as an underneath option. Some people say he's Daniel Graham. Some say he's Jason Witten. I think he's more towards the latter than the former, even if he won't be as good. Mind you, it depends on what team drafts him, but that's always the case. I suspect that he'll go to a team that needs/desires a TE that will be utilized immediately. Conversely, Coffman and co. should go later, and possibly have to fight for PT. As such, at this point in the draft, Pettigrew's a good value. I think he'll surprise more people than he'll disappoint.
Click to expand...
i'll agree with that. Pettigrew is the safest TE prospect in this draft. Personally, i prefer to draft a guy with a higher FF potential than a safer prospect.
Click to expand...
Certainly understandable, but I view Pettigrew as probably having a good career where he's consistently in the top 10 TEs with an upside of top 5. Few thought Cooley or Witten were going to be elite TEs either, but they do enough things well that they stay on the field and they catch well enough to be the safe play most downs, so their QBs develop faith in them. IMO, Pettigrew can be that kind of player. I could be mistaken, and he'll probably never be flashy. Aside from Gonzo and Gates, most of the top TEs human highlight reels but their QB has developed a connection with them.
 
Pettigrew should be a solid NFL player, but FF-wise I think he's along the lines of Heath Miller. Startable in TE required leagues, but not someone that's going to make a difference on your team.

 
lyon812 said:
awesomeness said:
MAC_32 said:
lyon812 said:
I find it hard not to value Pettigrew in this area. Like it or not, someone wants to take a chance on the only promising TE in the draft around here.
Click to expand...
I do not think Pettigrew is the #1 fantasy TE this year.
Click to expand...
;)He's top in my top 3 at TE.
Click to expand...
Of course he won't be the #1 fantasy TE, but he's complete. Great size, good hands, ferocious blocker, operates strongly as an underneath option. Some people say he's Daniel Graham. Some say he's Jason Witten. I think he's more towards the latter than the former, even if he won't be as good. Mind you, it depends on what team drafts him, but that's always the case. I suspect that he'll go to a team that needs/desires a TE that will be utilized immediately. Conversely, Coffman and co. should go later, and possibly have to fight for PT. As such, at this point in the draft, Pettigrew's a good value. I think he'll surprise more people than he'll disappoint.
Click to expand...
He could be another Dustin Keller if he goes to the right team. Or a Greg Olson. Drafting a TE early is a little risky.
 
bcr8f said:
lyon812 said:
awesomeness said:
MAC_32 said:
lyon812 said:
I find it hard not to value Pettigrew in this area. Like it or not, someone wants to take a chance on the only promising TE in the draft around here.
Click to expand...
I do not think Pettigrew is the #1 fantasy TE this year.
Click to expand...
:confused:He's top in my top 3 at TE.
Click to expand...
Of course he won't be the #1 fantasy TE, but he's complete. Great size, good hands, ferocious blocker, operates strongly as an underneath option. Some people say he's Daniel Graham. Some say he's Jason Witten. I think he's more towards the latter than the former, even if he won't be as good. Mind you, it depends on what team drafts him, but that's always the case. I suspect that he'll go to a team that needs/desires a TE that will be utilized immediately. Conversely, Coffman and co. should go later, and possibly have to fight for PT. As such, at this point in the draft, Pettigrew's a good value. I think he'll surprise more people than he'll disappoint.
Click to expand...
He could be another Dustin Keller if he goes to the right team. Or a Greg Olson. Drafting a TE early is a little risky.
Click to expand...
Pettigrew just isn't the type of player that Keller is. Pettigrew might be an every down TE, but he does not have the natural pass-catching skills of any of the guys that he has been compared to here (Witten, Keller). Maybe I'm misunderstanding some posts, but he certainly has potential to be one of the top 3 fantasy TE's among Rookies, but nowhere close to top 3 Overall in his Rookie season.It certainly depends on the team he goes to and weather they utilize their TEs as pass catchers or blockers for the most part.I'd say he has more bust potential than just about anyone we've ranked/discussed so far simply because he is still raw and has character concerns.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

miqws
Rookie RB WR opportunity value index
Replies
5
Views
646
miqws
miqws
socrates
Early 2026 Dynasty Rookie Draft Rankings
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
socrates
socrates
Anarchy99
History of Teams Starting Rookie QB Week 1 Across the SB Era
Replies
3
Views
5K
rzrback77
rzrback77

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top