What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dynasty Rookie #15 (1 Viewer)

Who is the #15 rookie in FF?

  • Brandon Pettigrew

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • James Davis

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Javon Ringer

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Juaquin Iglesias

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Jarett Dillard

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Jeremiah Johnson

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Brian Robiskie

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Josh Freeman

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Derick Williams

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • James Casey

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    0
jeter23

jeter23

Footballguy
For those of you who own the 2.03 (15) rookie pick in your dynasty league, or those that would like to own it, who are you taking?

Feel free to take your league rules and other details into account, as they are not specified. PPR, scarcity of RBs and obviously, team need would affect each vote.

1.01 Michael Crabtree, WR 38% (Moreno, 27%)

1.02 Knowshon Moreno, RB 62% (Wells, 17%)

1.03 Chris Wells, RB 45% (McCoy, 35%)

1.04 LeSean McCoy, RB 71% (Greene, 17%)

1.05 Shonn Greene, RB 52% (Maclin, 21%)

1.06 Jeremy Maclin, WR 58% (Harvin, 19%)

1.07 Percy Harvin, WR 44% (Brown, 17%)

1.08 Donald Brown, RB 40% (Stafford, 29%)

1.09 Darius Heyward-Bey, WR 34% (Stafford, 32%)

1.10 Matt Stafford, QB 43% (Britt, 24%)

1.11 Kenny Britt, WR 34% (Sanchez, 18%)

1.12 Hakeen Nicks, WR 50% (Sanchez, 15%)

2.01 Matt Sanchez, QB 36% (Jennings, 23%)

2.02 Rashad Jennings, RB 35% (Ringer, 20%)

 
It will be interesting comparing this with the IDP spin off in the other forum.

Went with Pettigrew but in an actual draft I think I would hold off on a TE selection for better value because the drop off is not as steep - although from the sounds of it on the boards Coffman may be getting interest earlier than I had originally anticipated and my "value" will have to fall to Nelson (I'm hoping 3rd round).

 
Pretty surprised to still see Ringer as an option here. I guess some of you aren't sold on him in the pro's. I would think that has more to do with his size than anything else and I can't argue with that. I would however take a flyer on him over a wr that is a total project.

 
Blackjacks said:
Pretty surprised to still see Ringer as an option here. I guess some of you aren't sold on him in the pro's. I would think that has more to do with his size than anything else and I can't argue with that. I would however take a flyer on him over a wr that is a total project.
Click to expand...
size, durability, lack of burst, lack of elite skill. No thanks
 
awesomeness said:
Blackjacks said:
Pretty surprised to still see Ringer as an option here. I guess some of you aren't sold on him in the pro's. I would think that has more to do with his size than anything else and I can't argue with that. I would however take a flyer on him over a wr that is a total project.
Click to expand...
size, durability, lack of burst, lack of elite skill. No thanks
Click to expand...
:goodposting: (or maybe it is still being a U of M fan that causes me to lose my objectivity)
 
Holland Freeze said:
awesomeness said:
Blackjacks said:
Pretty surprised to still see Ringer as an option here. I guess some of you aren't sold on him in the pro's. I would think that has more to do with his size than anything else and I can't argue with that. I would however take a flyer on him over a wr that is a total project.
Click to expand...
size, durability, lack of burst, lack of elite skill. No thanks
Click to expand...
:pics: (or maybe it is still being a U of M fan that causes me to lose my objectivity ability to forecast RB success in the NFL)
Click to expand...
Has Michigan ever put out a successful RB?
 
FUBAR said:
Holland Freeze said:
awesomeness said:
Blackjacks said:
Pretty surprised to still see Ringer as an option here. I guess some of you aren't sold on him in the pro's. I would think that has more to do with his size than anything else and I can't argue with that. I would however take a flyer on him over a wr that is a total project.
Click to expand...
size, durability, lack of burst, lack of elite skill. No thanks
Click to expand...
:goodposting: (or maybe it is still being a U of M fan that causes me to lose my objectivity ability to forecast RB success in the NFL)
Click to expand...
Has Michigan ever put out a successful RB?
Click to expand...
So because he's a fan of a team that hasn't put out a quality NFL RB in...well...a really long time, he can't judge what a successful NFL RB looks like?Fail.

Epic fail.

If you were just trying to be funny, well, you failed there too.

:golf clap:

 
Going with FUBAR's tangential discussion - how much stock do people put in a schools history regarding certain positions in evaluating a current player? It is not something I have put much faith in but would be interested in hearing if others disagree and if so why.

 
MAC_32 said:
FUBAR said:
Holland Freeze said:
awesomeness said:
Blackjacks said:
Pretty surprised to still see Ringer as an option here. I guess some of you aren't sold on him in the pro's. I would think that has more to do with his size than anything else and I can't argue with that. I would however take a flyer on him over a wr that is a total project.
Click to expand...
size, durability, lack of burst, lack of elite skill. No thanks
Click to expand...
:pickle: (or maybe it is still being a U of M fan that causes me to lose my objectivity ability to forecast RB success in the NFL)
Click to expand...
Has Michigan ever put out a successful RB?
Click to expand...
So because he's a fan of a team that hasn't put out a quality NFL RB in...well...a really long time, he can't judge what a successful NFL RB looks like?Fail.

Epic fail.

If you were just trying to be funny, well, you failed there too.

:golf clap:
Click to expand...
:pickle: Don't be so sensitive Sally.
 
Holland Freeze said:
Going with FUBAR's tangential discussion - how much stock do people put in a schools history regarding certain positions in evaluating a current player? It is not something I have put much faith in but would be interested in hearing if others disagree and if so why.
Click to expand...
I didn't intend to initiate a discussion, but it's somewhat of an interesting subject. I don't put much faith into it, but have to acknowledge where certain coaches do a better job scouting. As a general rule, you could count on USC producing good IDPs, and Michigan OL. Oddly, while we tend to think of the Big Ten as a running back's conference, it's the OL and QBs who have more success on the whole.
 
FUBAR said:
Holland Freeze said:
Going with FUBAR's tangential discussion - how much stock do people put in a schools history regarding certain positions in evaluating a current player? It is not something I have put much faith in but would be interested in hearing if others disagree and if so why.
Click to expand...
I didn't intend to initiate a discussion, but it's somewhat of an interesting subject. I don't put much faith into it, but have to acknowledge where certain coaches do a better job scouting. As a general rule, you could count on USC producing good IDPs, and Michigan OL. Oddly, while we tend to think of the Big Ten as a running back's conference, it's the OL and QBs who have more success on the whole.
Click to expand...
1. Bump2. Is it time to wrap this one up and move to #16?3. It's the OL that will allow the RB's to roam. I agree a coach may have a strength or weakness but I do not agree that a coach not known for producing a top flight players at a certain position should have that held against the player that is the exception to the rule.
 
FUBAR said:
Holland Freeze said:
Going with FUBAR's tangential discussion - how much stock do people put in a schools history regarding certain positions in evaluating a current player? It is not something I have put much faith in but would be interested in hearing if others disagree and if so why.
Click to expand...
I didn't intend to initiate a discussion, but it's somewhat of an interesting subject. I don't put much faith into it, but have to acknowledge where certain coaches do a better job scouting. As a general rule, you could count on USC producing good IDPs, and Michigan OL. Oddly, while we tend to think of the Big Ten as a running back's conference, it's the OL and QBs who have more success on the whole.
Click to expand...
1. Bump2. Is it time to wrap this one up and move to #16?3. It's the OL that will allow the RB's to roam. I agree a coach may have a strength or weakness but I do not agree that a coach not known for producing a top flight players at a certain position should have that held against the player that is the exception to the rule.
 
Holland Freeze said:
FUBAR said:
Holland Freeze said:
Going with FUBAR's tangential discussion - how much stock do people put in a schools history regarding certain positions in evaluating a current player? It is not something I have put much faith in but would be interested in hearing if others disagree and if so why.
Click to expand...
I didn't intend to initiate a discussion, but it's somewhat of an interesting subject. I don't put much faith into it, but have to acknowledge where certain coaches do a better job scouting. As a general rule, you could count on USC producing good IDPs, and Michigan OL. Oddly, while we tend to think of the Big Ten as a running back's conference, it's the OL and QBs who have more success on the whole.
Click to expand...
1. Bump2. Is it time to wrap this one up and move to #16?

3. It's the OL that will allow the RB's to roam. I agree a coach may have a strength or weakness but I do not agree that a coach not known for producing a top flight players at a certain position should have that held against the player that is the exception to the rule.
Click to expand...
Nor is that what I said. I simply grant a little favoritism to a player who played for a coach who consistently produces good players at that position. You can say that automatically means a downgrade for everyone else, but those coaches are rare, so the effect to the other players is minimal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

miqws
Rookie RB WR opportunity value index
Replies
5
Views
2K
miqws
miqws
socrates
Early 2026 Dynasty Rookie Draft Rankings
2
Replies
52
Views
15K
Max Power
Max Power
miqws
Team needs by dynasty ranking 2025
Replies
14
Views
1K
rockaction
rockaction

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top