then sign F. Taylor, Galloway, etc.. They load up and get talent out of vets better than anyone.If someone told you a year ago that the Pats would trade Cassel and Vrabel for Julius Peppers, you'd have them committed.Insane what this team is able to do every year.
And yet they haven't been able to win a Super Bowl in any of the last four NFL seasons.If someone told you a year ago that the Pats would trade Cassel and Vrabel for Julius Peppers, you'd have them committed.Insane what this team is able to do every year.
A deal hasn't been done yet.I'm surprised the Panthers can't get a better deal than that.
what he said.HELLLLLLLSSSSSSS YES!!!
eta: if true.
It isnt done yet, here is a quote from the linked article:"According to league sources, the Patriots and Panthers are hoping to complete the deal at some point between the March 22-25 NFL owners meetings and the start of the draft on April 25."That would be a nice addition, IMHO.
Nobody's been talking about a Peppers for Cutler trade except Panthers homers with skewed perspective.my analysis: un-freakin-realIf it's true what's being tossed around about BB stickin' it to McDaniels with the Cassel trade, this may be a preemptive strike since it's also being talked about here that Peppers could be sent to DEN for Cutler. It's probably all just crazy-talk anyway...Can'tstandya PATs; but you kill with these FA moves
![]()
like I said- only talked about here & probably crazy-talk anyway. This proves it.Nobody's been talking about a Peppers for Cutler trade except Panthers homers with skewed perspective.![]()
my analysis: un-freakin-real
If it's true what's being tossed around about BB stickin' it to McDaniels with the Cassel trade, this may be a preemptive strike since it's also being talked about here that Peppers could be sent to DEN for Cutler. It's probably all just crazy-talk anyway...
Can'tstandya PATs; but you kill with these FA moves![]()
what he said.HELLLLLLLSSSSSSS YES!!!
eta: if true.
If I were a betting man, I would not expect the Pats to extend Seymour's contract.After my initial glee wore off it hit me....How exactly is NE going to afford him?![]()
I would tend to agree. The priority is (and should be) Vince Wilfork.ETA: Expect Seymour to have a career year.If I were a betting man, I would not expect the Pats to extend Seymour's contract.After my initial glee wore off it hit me....How exactly is NE going to afford him?![]()
I think most Panther fans know that Jay Cutler is not Jerry Richardson and John Fox's type of guy.Nobody's been talking about a Peppers for Cutler trade except Panthers homers with skewed perspective.
That would likely be a given... but I had my doubts about them re-signing Seymour before this news broke. But even if they didn’t extend Seymour, or Wilfork, or Mankins, or Green... they still can't even afford to pay him (Peppers) even HALF of his 16m tag right now. They would have to trim some fat and then set him up with a Haynesworth type of deal. Huge bonus, low '09 base with the bulk of his bread coming due in '010 (banking on an uncapped season). If they were to do that, it's going to send out a clear signal to the league that yet another high roller intends to fully take advantage of the CBA "situation".If I were a betting man, I would not expect the Pats to extend Seymour's contract.After my initial glee wore off it hit me....How exactly is NE going to afford him?![]()
I'm not sure this word means what you think it does.The word that comes to mind RE: the Patriots is "collusion".
agreed with the last... if this transpires, perhaps seymour won't be with the club much longer (maybe as soon as 2010?)... than again, if the league goes uncapped, there could be a shift at a tectonic level, that could really change the league landscape...* haven't the owners vowed to not enter an uncapped season?& the possibility of a 2011 (?) work stoppage looms over this central issue, until & if a CBA agreement is hammered out in time (the owners also are dickering over disparate income of advantaged & disadvantaged populations, a thorny, divisive, polarizing issue... hard for BUF or JAX to make as much money on the side as DAL or WAS)...... They would have to trim some fat and then set him up with a Haynesworth type of deal. Huge bonus, low '09 base with the bulk of his bread coming due in '010 (banking on an uncapped season). If they were to do that, it's going to send out a clear signal to the league that yet another high roller intends to fully take advantage of the CBA "situation".
Perhaps both?Whether it's adding Peppers or Jayson Taylor...
He wouldn't be the first guy to take less money to play for New England.They're going to need to do some creative accounting. He's going to want at least Dwight Freeney money plus 2 years of cap inflation so we're talking $35~40M guaranteed, $80~85M total.
I doubt they add both.Peppers is a much better fit from a talent / health perspective.Not sure how he will fit into the Pats 3/4 scheme.Perhaps both?Whether it's adding Peppers or Jayson Taylor...
Yeah...'09 is a contract year for Seymour, Wilfork, Mankins, and Green.agreed with the last... if this transpires, perhaps seymour won't be with the club much longer (maybe as soon as 2010?)... than again, if the league goes uncapped, there could be a shift at a tectonic level, that could really change the league landscape...... They would have to trim some fat and then set him up with a Haynesworth type of deal. Huge bonus, low '09 base with the bulk of his bread coming due in '010 (banking on an uncapped season). If they were to do that, it's going to send out a clear signal to the league that yet another high roller intends to fully take advantage of the CBA "situation".
I'd say that it is unlikely, but not impossible. I think Taylor's best role at this point might be as a part-time player. Perhaps have him sharing time with Crable and/or Guyton, with Adalius Thomas switching back and forth between the inside and outside depending upon who else is on the field. Taylor might also take less money to play here and in that type of a role given his relationships with Brady and Belichick.Just a thought and total speculation on my part... on the other hand, New England may no longer be interested in someone who has shown less than 100% dedication to football over the past year or two.I doubt they add both.Peppers is a much better fit from a talent / health perspective.Perhaps both?Whether it's adding Peppers or Jayson Taylor...
I think this shows that Taylor isn't a Belichick type of player.The 3/4 may not be used as much if Peppers is playing in NE.I'd say that it is unlikely, but not impossible. I think Taylor's best role at this point might be as a part-time player. Perhaps have him sharing time with Crable and/or Guyton, with Adalius Thomas switching back and forth between the inside and outside depending upon who else is on the field. Taylor might also take less money to play here and in that type of a role given his relationships with Brady and Belichick.Just a thought and total speculation on my part... on the other hand, New England may no longer be interested in someone who has shown less than 100% dedication to football over the past year or two.I doubt they add both.Peppers is a much better fit from a talent / health perspective.Perhaps both?Whether it's adding Peppers or Jayson Taylor...
I thought Adalius Thomas was supposed to be Superman?This will be another disappointing big player signing by the Patriots. Why would the Panther let Peppers go if he was THE difference maker. The Pats have their difference maker; he wears #12. Too much money. What's Wilfork going to want now?Kraft never should have let Pioli go!!!!Who knows if he can play OLB.Ahh who am I kidding, Belicheck will have him all over the field playing like Superman
So then he's going to make more than Tom Brady? That would be awkward.They're going to need to do some creative accounting. He's going to want at least Dwight Freeney money plus 2 years of cap inflation so we're talking $35~40M guaranteed, $80~85M total.
Another disapointing player ?Where you been ?As far as SP goes, Scott paid his dues and went to KC most likely for more decision making power.Kraft was right to let him go, imo.I thought Adalius Thomas was supposed to be Superman?This will be another disappointing big player signing by the Patriots. Why would the Panther let Peppers go if he was THE difference maker. The Pats have their difference maker; he wears #12. Too much money. What's Wilfork going to want now?Kraft never should have let Pioli go!!!!Who knows if he can play OLB.Ahh who am I kidding, Belicheck will have him all over the field playing like Superman
I'm not sure this word means what you think it does.The word that comes to mind RE: the Patriots is "collusion".
![]()
Seems to fit to me. Collusion was just the first word that came to mind. Another, perhaps more accurate, is shenanigans.col⋅lu⋅sion /kəˈluʒən/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kuh-loo-zhuhn] –noun1. a secret agreement, esp. for fraudulent or treacherous purposes; conspiracy: Some of his employees were acting in collusion to rob him.2. Law. a secret understanding between two or more persons to gain something illegally, to defraud another of his or her rights, or to appear as adversaries though in agreement: collusion of husband and wife to obtain a divorce.
I guess I don't see how that applies here...?I'm not sure this word means what you think it does.The word that comes to mind RE: the Patriots is "collusion".
Seems to fit to me. Collusion was just the first word that came to mind. Another, perhaps more accurate, is shenanigans.col⋅lu⋅sion /kəˈluʒən/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kuh-loo-zhuhn] –noun1. a secret agreement, esp. for fraudulent or treacherous purposes; conspiracy: Some of his employees were acting in collusion to rob him.2. Law. a secret understanding between two or more persons to gain something illegally, to defraud another of his or her rights, or to appear as adversaries though in agreement: collusion of husband and wife to obtain a divorce.
Bob,1st of all, great post as always from you. I think it is really sad that the owners don't realize they ahve a great thing and why rock the boat? With the economy the way it is and even an optimist has to think it will take years for thigns to return to normal...why rock the boat?This has been the era in the 2000s of workmanlike teams such as NE, PITT, NYG, INDY...and it seems like there are lots of teams that have been able to put a run together because of the way the league has been structured. Personally I think the league has been watered down a lot and unfortunately not all 32 teams can make equal amounts of money...but that doesn't stop teams like Pittsburgh for example to not stay competitive. Teams like Oakland, Cinci, Detroit...those teams are never gonna get it turned around they are currently run...and they don't deserve fan support, survival of the fittest.agreed with the last... if this transpires, perhaps seymour won't be with the club much longer (maybe as soon as 2010?)... than again, if the league goes uncapped, there could be a shift at a tectonic level, that could really change the league landscape...* haven't the owners vowed to not enter an uncapped season?& the possibility of a 2011 (?) work stoppage looms over this central issue, until & if a CBA agreement is hammered out in time (the owners also are dickering over disparate income of advantaged & disadvantaged populations, a thorny, divisive, polarizing issue... hard for BUF or JAX to make as much money on the side as DAL or WAS)...... They would have to trim some fat and then set him up with a Haynesworth type of deal. Huge bonus, low '09 base with the bulk of his bread coming due in '010 (banking on an uncapped season). If they were to do that, it's going to send out a clear signal to the league that yet another high roller intends to fully take advantage of the CBA "situation".
Because Peppers for a 2nd doesn't seem to match any better than Cassell and Vrabel for a 2nd did.I guess I don't see how that applies here...?I'm not sure this word means what you think it does.The word that comes to mind RE: the Patriots is "collusion".
Seems to fit to me. Collusion was just the first word that came to mind. Another, perhaps more accurate, is shenanigans.col⋅lu⋅sion /kəˈluʒən/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kuh-loo-zhuhn] –noun1. a secret agreement, esp. for fraudulent or treacherous purposes; conspiracy: Some of his employees were acting in collusion to rob him.2. Law. a secret understanding between two or more persons to gain something illegally, to defraud another of his or her rights, or to appear as adversaries though in agreement: collusion of husband and wife to obtain a divorce.
good point, & generally i would totally agree...peppers may be a difference of kind, & not just degree...brady is the best & took less (but did he take a LOT less?)moss took less, but he was older than peppers & coming off some horrific seasons in OAK...peppers is one of the best DEs in the game (with mario williams & jared allen?) & is in the prime of his career... if he wanted to hit the open market, he would almost certainly become one of the highest paid defenders in the league history... he might give up SOMETHING to have a better shot at super bowl (HoF?), but i don't foresee him taking a drastic haircut on his prospective future earnings... & anything, IN THE BALLPARK of what he could expect with a new contract, is going to impact the pats cap, now & in the future...this fits in so many ways...peppers said he wanted to go to a 3-4 (why, i have no idea? but he said it), so that narrowed the field... the pats have the ammo by manipulating previous drafts, drafting well & stockpiling picks to make a big move like this... what player WOULDN'T want to go to NE... & the pats have had a super bowl dry spell, & this is the kind of move that could get them over the hump, & put them in contention to possibly win a few more... add a player with the talent & athleticism of peppers, to what they already have, & its a move CAR might not make if NE was in the NFC?He wouldn't be the first guy to take less money to play for New England.They're going to need to do some creative accounting. He's going to want at least Dwight Freeney money plus 2 years of cap inflation so we're talking $35~40M guaranteed, $80~85M total.
good points, though i wonder if seymour's recent injury history will impact on belichick's decision to keep him or not... & what kind of salary he could command? at least peppers seems to be a bit cleaner in his recent medical history... but i agree with everything you said about seymour being a stud, & the greatest 3-4 DL of his generation...* BTW, i see some speculation that peppers might play LB? its possible on a limited basis... he is athletic enough to do that (sheesh, he is probably athletic enough to play NT & than CB on some snaps!Seymour will command big dollars as he is still young and arguably the best pure 34 DE of this generation. With so many teams converting, he will be a hot commodity.
This is where it gets weird.Mario Williams cost the Texans the first overall pick in the draft, and Jared Alled cost the Vikes 2 first rounders. Peppers is at least equal to these two - probably better. He is not old - still has potentially 4-6 great seasons left. Why would he only cost a 2nd, when those other two cost so much more?good point, & generally i would totally agree...peppers may be a difference of kind, & not just degree...He wouldn't be the first guy to take less money to play for New England.They're going to need to do some creative accounting. He's going to want at least Dwight Freeney money plus 2 years of cap inflation so we're talking $35~40M guaranteed, $80~85M total.
brady is the best & took less (but did he take a LOT less?)
moss took less, but he was older than peppers & coming off some horrific seasons in OAK...
peppers is one of the best DEs in the game (with mario williams & jared allen?) & is in the prime of his career... if he wanted to hit the open market, he would almost certainly become one of the highest paid defenders in the league history... he might give up SOMETHING to have a better shot at super bowl (HoF?), but i don't foresee him taking a drastic haircut on his prospective future earnings... & anything, IN THE BALLPARK of what he could expect with a new contract, is going to impact the pats cap, now & in the future...
this fits in so many ways...
peppers said he wanted to go to a 3-4 (why, i have no idea? but he said it), so that narrowed the field... the pats have the ammo by manipulating previous drafts, drafting well & stockpiling picks to make a big move like this... what player WOULDN'T want to go to NE... & the pats have had a super bowl dry speel, & this is the kind of move that could get them over the hump, & put them in contention to possibly win a few more...