Haha, it's cool.Not trying to be a #### here but in terms of your thread title, it sucks and would be a whole lot more helpful if it gave some hint of what you are going to be talking about.
oops you said talentLTADMJDPortisWestbrookMaybe Chris Johnson here. I just have not seen enough of him to be sure.In terms of dynastyADMJDMorenoDeAngelo WilliamsPortisLTForteWestbrook
This looks goodoops you said talentLTADMJDPortisWestbrookMaybe Chris Johnson here. I just have not seen enough of him to be sure.In terms of dynastyADMJDMorenoDeAngelo WilliamsPortisLTForteWestbrook
In terms of pure talent no way Im putting Sjax over Peterson or DeAngelo in the top 5.. Portis is more of a "talent" than Williams.In terms of pure talent, not situation. What are your Top 5 Running Backs in the league?1.) Steven Jackson2.) Adrian Peterson3.) Maurice Jones-Drew4.) DeAngelo Williams5.) Michael Turner
Had him on both my lists as I see it as a cut off for elite RBs. He and LT are 30 so they are a little lower than the younger guys.Portis hurts himself being left in to block so often. But he is better protection than Cooley is so he stays in to watch for the blitz most of the time before releasing into a pattern.I'm truly shocked at the lack of Brian Westbrook love in this thread.
Agreed. I'm also thinking that Stewart & Gore are probably being underrated by a few. Although to be fair the OP only asked for five.I'm truly shocked at the lack of Brian Westbrook love in this thread.
oops you said talentLTADMJDPortisWestbrookMaybe Chris Johnson here. I just have not seen enough of him to be sure.In terms of dynastyADMJDMorenoDeAngelo WilliamsPortisLTForteWestbrook
Edgerrin James has to be very high on that list. Joseph Addai is pretty good, too. Those two come to mind right away. In fact, from a technique standpoint I think James is the best runner at getting his pads low in the league. There was a time he was a clear, top-five talent. One of my favorite RBs to watch. In 1999 and 2000 he was special and during those years well after his knee injury his technique and vision were so good that he was still one of the better backs in the league despite losing some of his speed and quickness. It says how good he really was - much like Gore being a great talent despite the fact his ACL tear really robbed him of dominating physical skills. Westbrook would probably get more love from me if this were a top 10 list. His vision and elusiveness are very close to top five quality on my list and I'm sure he could easily be exchanged with other players there. His receiving would probably earn him best in category and if I added that into my rough categorization of skills, he'd probably be in my top five. Of course, Jackson is good at this too.Good stuff Matt.How would you rank RBs as blockers?I am trying to think if anyone else is better at this than Portis and I consider it to be a talent. Not a useful one for fantasy in itself but a talent none the less.
if it's based on talent and not age...LTEdgePetersonPortisWestbrookIn terms of pure talent, not situation. What are your Top 5 Running Backs in the league?1.) Steven Jackson2.) Adrian Peterson3.) Maurice Jones-Drew4.) DeAngelo Williams5.) Michael Turner
In their primes, sure. But I think it's obvious that the question is who are the top 5 CURRENT talents. This is why LT and Westy and even Portis are being left off of a lot of lists.if it's based on talent and not age...LTEdgePetersonPortisWestbrookIn terms of pure talent, not situation. What are your Top 5 Running Backs in the league?1.) Steven Jackson2.) Adrian Peterson3.) Maurice Jones-Drew4.) DeAngelo Williams5.) Michael Turner
But age doesn't eliminate talent. It's just the body is unable to display the talent... see every bit of talent is within the brain which controls the muscles, etc. The brain still sends out all the signals, the body just can't respond as quickly as it used to. You really have to ignore age when it comes to "talent" conversations.Had him on both my lists as I see it as a cut off for elite RBs. He and LT are 30 so they are a little lower than the younger guys.I'm truly shocked at the lack of Brian Westbrook love in this thread.
The original post was pretty vauge. Been cleared up a bit by the title change, I kind of went off on my own tangent.If we are talking about all time then of course sweetness and Barry would have to be up there.But age doesn't eliminate talent. It's just the body is unable to display the talent... see every bit of talent is within the brain which controls the muscles, etc. The brain still sends out all the signals, the body just can't respond as quickly as it used to. You really have to ignore age when it comes to "talent" conversations.Had him on both my lists as I see it as a cut off for elite RBs. He and LT are 30 so they are a little lower than the younger guys.I'm truly shocked at the lack of Brian Westbrook love in this thread.
How anyone can have a top-5 list of "talented" RBS playing, and not have LT on it is beyond me. LT is one of the most talented RBs to EVER play the game, much less among the current NFL runningbacks.
I don't think so...if your body can't display your talent, you don't have it. Ryan Grant's brain might be sending out signals to hit the hole just as fast as ADP....but if his body can't get him there as fast, he's less talented.switz said:But age doesn't eliminate talent. It's just the body is unable to display the talent... see every bit of talent is within the brain which controls the muscles, etc. The brain still sends out all the signals, the body just can't respond as quickly as it used to. You really have to ignore age when it comes to "talent" conversations.Biabreakable said:Had him on both my lists as I see it as a cut off for elite RBs. He and LT are 30 so they are a little lower than the younger guys.sheerterror said:I'm truly shocked at the lack of Brian Westbrook love in this thread.
money.never.sleeps said:In terms of pure talent no way Im putting Sjax over Peterson or DeAngelo in the top 5.. Portis is more of a "talent" than Williams.Eminence said:In terms of pure talent, not situation. What are your Top 5 Running Backs in the league?1.) Steven Jackson2.) Adrian Peterson3.) Maurice Jones-Drew4.) DeAngelo Williams5.) Michael TurnerIm gonna have to come back to this ranking but can already tell there is alot of short sightedness here about fantasy points compared to real real skill or talent.
To clear up any questions, this means their pure talent as of right now. Sure Edgerrin and Portis at one point were enormous talents, but it has dwindled with age.
Not to drag this out... but realistically, if there are two 22 year old players, both had 4 years high school, 3 or 4 years college, and they enter the NFL... the differentiator in their talent is truly brain driven. In many dictionaries a synonym for talent is genius, it's defined as natural ability. That eliminates then things you can improve, like strength. Speed to a degree is improvable as well. Vision is one of the things that sets great RBs apart, and what is vision, it recognition and response - completely brain driven.Ryan Grant simply isn't as talented as ADP because his brain is not as responsive as ADPs when it comes to playing football.Yes, age, injury, etc. limit the ability to display the talent, but it doesn't eliminate the talent from existing. Heck, players even say "My body just doesn't respond like it used to."You don't lose talent, you lose ability. That's why when people lose their legs, we say they are "disabled" we don't assume they don't know how to walk.Being a top level RB is a combination of talent and ability. Age, injuries, etc. sap ability, not talent. So if you want to argue talent, you need to exclude age and injuries.I would even argue their are RBs that have more physical ability that others, but aren't as talented.I don't think so...if your body can't display your talent, you don't have it. Ryan Grant's brain might be sending out signals to hit the hole just as fast as ADP....but if his body can't get him there as fast, he's less talented.switz said:But age doesn't eliminate talent. It's just the body is unable to display the talent... see every bit of talent is within the brain which controls the muscles, etc. The brain still sends out all the signals, the body just can't respond as quickly as it used to. You really have to ignore age when it comes to "talent" conversations.
McFadden? really? I can't see how Bush isn't more talented and I'm not advocating for Bush to be top 5.To clear up any questions, this means their pure talent as of right now. Sure Edgerrin and Portis at one point were enormous talents, but it has dwindled with age.Otherwise, we could include certain RBs whose injuries have prevented them from becoming elite performers. IMO, Chris Perry was among the most talented backs before his injuries deroded his talent. Right now, just their talent:ADCJ3McFaddenJ-StewRonnie Brown
I thought it was because he wasn't as fast or as strong. I'm really not sure what you are trying to say.Ryan Grant simply isn't as talented as ADP because his brain is not as responsive as ADPs when it comes to playing football.
IMO, McFadden has a better all-around game than Bush. Assuming you mean Reggie. Or do you mean Michael?McFadden is one of the guys who didnt start out on a tear, but could become one of the best in the league. But then, maybe I've just watched too much SEC and not enough Raiders games?McFadden? really? I can't see how Bush isn't more talented and I'm not advocating for Bush to be top 5.To clear up any questions, this means their pure talent as of right now. Sure Edgerrin and Portis at one point were enormous talents, but it has dwindled with age.Otherwise, we could include certain RBs whose injuries have prevented them from becoming elite performers. IMO, Chris Perry was among the most talented backs before his injuries deroded his talent. Right now, just their talent:ADCJ3McFaddenJ-StewRonnie Brown
Sorry, I did mean Reggie.IMO, McFadden has a better all-around game than Bush. Assuming you mean Reggie. Or do you mean Michael?McFadden is one of the guys who didnt start out on a tear, but could become one of the best in the league. But then, maybe I've just watched too much SEC and not enough Raiders games?McFadden? really? I can't see how Bush isn't more talented and I'm not advocating for Bush to be top 5.To clear up any questions, this means their pure talent as of right now. Sure Edgerrin and Portis at one point were enormous talents, but it has dwindled with age.Otherwise, we could include certain RBs whose injuries have prevented them from becoming elite performers. IMO, Chris Perry was among the most talented backs before his injuries deroded his talent. Right now, just their talent:ADCJ3McFaddenJ-StewRonnie Brown
This is pretty close to how I see it as well. I'd bump Brown off the list and put MJD 2nd after Peterson.Right now, just their talent:ADCJ3McFaddenJ-StewRonnie Brown