What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*Official Pick #1* Thread (1 Viewer)

greenline

Footballguy
Assuming non-PPR in redrafts, it's ADP but even in PPR, many will still take him. After that it's whatever falls out at Pick #20 or pick #24 (depending on if it's a 10 or 12 team league)

With your second pick you can only hope some owners before you let a RB slip to you such as Marion Barber or Brandon Jacobs. You also are considering a WR here perhaps in the likes of Steve Smith, Reggie Wayne or Greg Jennings.

 
Top of Rd 3 we are looking at an interesting temptation in Tom Brady or Drew Brees. I wouldn't go that way most likely but I think some guys will fall in love with the idea. I might be looking at Ryan Grant depending on how things shake out.

Then it's another long wait until the end of Round 4.

 
I'm in a PPR and I think I am going with ADP and then try to hit 2 WR with my next two on the turn. Something like Jennings, Wayne, Smith or Colston. I could probably get Bush there as well and that might also be an option

 
I think owners with the #1 should really keep a "best available" philosophy at that turn. It could be a back you really like who slipped by, or a receiver you didn't expect to be there or maybe a top QB.

I don't really think there's a consensus #1 this year, so I doubt there's a consensus top 23. That means you're likely to have guys in your top 20 available at #24 and #25. I say just wait and see who it is. Focus instead on who you want the following turn, because a good guy you don't take at 4/5 likely won't be there at the end of round 6. Plan to "follow" at 2/3 but "lead" at 4/5.

 
What if you had the #1, non-ppr, all TD's 6 points and start 2 QB's? ADP a no brainer but at 20-21 maybe consider a QB there? Brees/Brady are long gone.

 
Just found out I have first pick in my 12 team, $300 per man league. I'll be doing some mocks in the coming days from this spot and will report back with what strategy I start seeing as most successful IMO.

- Non-ppr

- All TDs worth 6pts

- 1 pt per 10 rush/receiving

- 1 pt per 25 passing

Barring injury I'm pretty sure I'll be going AP first. I'll heavily consider Turner, MJD, and even LT if one of them has a super-fluff schedule compared to AP, but I haven't checked schedules yet.

 
Hoart Petterson said:
What if you had the #1, non-ppr, all TD's 6 points and start 2 QB's? ADP a no brainer but at 20-21 maybe consider a QB there? Brees/Brady are long gone.
I've played 2QB leagues for ten years. I would think about Brady or Brees at #1 in that format. Honestly. the value of a top QB in a 2QB league cannot be overlooked.
 
Hoart Petterson said:
What if you had the #1, non-ppr, all TD's 6 points and start 2 QB's? ADP a no brainer but at 20-21 maybe consider a QB there? Brees/Brady are long gone.
I've played 2QB leagues for ten years. I would think about Brady or Brees at #1 in that format. Honestly. the value of a top QB in a 2QB league cannot be overlooked.
Even if it was start 2-4-4? First 7 picks in our league will be RB's for sure.
 
Hoart Petterson said:
What if you had the #1, non-ppr, all TD's 6 points and start 2 QB's? ADP a no brainer but at 20-21 maybe consider a QB there? Brees/Brady are long gone.
I've played 2QB leagues for ten years. I would think about Brady or Brees at #1 in that format. Honestly. the value of a top QB in a 2QB league cannot be overlooked.
Even if it was start 2-4-4? First 7 picks in our league will be RB's for sure.
Yeah that's different so I'd stay with ADP. We always did 2-2-3.
 
I had something on this earlier awhile back. Do you still take Peterson without Favre? (even tho i think he will join in a few weeks, trust me) anyways..I was also considering brees, because our league is sorta QB heavy with 1 pt per 20 yards. and 6 pnts a TD. idk. I think I will still go Peterson.

 
I just checked schedules of AP, Turner, and MJD.

Turner certainly has the hardest. AP's is easy enough with some tough games sprinkled in (Baltimore/Pittsburgh back-to-back in weeks 6 and 7). MJD's schedule is a joke. His toughest games are two games with Tennessee (who no longer has Haynesworth) and the NY Jets.

Call me crazy but if both guys do well and finish the preseason healthy, I may go MJD > Peterson.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think owners with the #1 should really keep a "best available" philosophy at that turn. It could be a back you really like who slipped by, or a receiver you didn't expect to be there or maybe a top QB. I don't really think there's a consensus #1 this year, so I doubt there's a consensus top 23. That means you're likely to have guys in your top 20 available at #24 and #25. I say just wait and see who it is. Focus instead on who you want the following turn, because a good guy you don't take at 4/5 likely won't be there at the end of round 6. Plan to "follow" at 2/3 but "lead" at 4/5.
Very good points here.
 
#1 overall in a new PPR dynasty league. Definitley going AP over MJD despite the PPR and MJD having the easier schedule. At the 2\3 turn I think you have to go WR\WR unless for some reason Brady or Brees falls there. an opening of AP, Brees\Brady, Wayne\Smith\Jennings seems to good to pass up.

 
#1 overall in a new PPR dynasty league. Definitley going AP over MJD despite the PPR and MJD having the easier schedule. At the 2\3 turn I think you have to go WR\WR unless for some reason Brady or Brees falls there. an opening of AP, Brees\Brady, Wayne\Smith\Jennings seems to good to pass up.
I agree with you that Brady/Brees are an option on the first wrap around, but if you do that, your second WR you get at the end of round 4 or early round 5 is nothing hot and you'd still have to take another RB at that spot also.However, if you skip a QB in the early rounds and go 2 WRs, you will still take a RB in the next wrap around like you would even if you did take a QB, but the QBs you can get then are better than the WRs you can get then.Example, which team would you rather have:QB- Brees/BradyRB- A.PetersonRB- D.WardWR- S.SmithWR- S.HolmesorQB- Rodgers/Rivers/Warner/RomoRB- A.PetersonRB- D.WardWR- S.SmithWR- G.JenningsI personally feel the difference between say Brees and Aaron Rodgers will be less significant than the difference between Greg Jennings and Santonio Holmes.JMO. Don't think there really is a "right or wrong" answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm #1 in a 10 team PPR redraft, I am 100% going with MJD. If it wasn't MJD it'd be Forte.

It seems to me that there are a solid 12-15 WR's with a couple sleepers/high risk after that, and there is a ton of value in the 4th round running back. On the 2.10/3.01 turn, I've run a ton of mocks, and I am always happiest with my team when going WR/WR. That is assuming incredible RB value doesn't drop. Then taking the best RB value on the 4.10/5.01 for my RB2. I've never been someone to grab a QB before the 6th round, so 5.01 might be another "4th round" RB that slips (why not take 2 and see if one pans out, I like depth here), or the best WR available, unless somehow a top 3 TE falls. (we start 2 rb, 3 wr, 1 te).

I'm flexible but I have an idea.. kind of like a flow chart.. for the 2/3 and 4/5. 6th+ is too hard to predict, but I have ADP's and targeted players for later. 1-5 take the best available for your draft style, 6-10 go ahead and look for value but don't be afraid to reach for people you like. That's my philosophy.

 
I did multiple mock drafts last night selecting from the 1st position in a 12 person draft. I'm seriously considering drafting MJD > Peterson but for simplicity here I took Peterson #1 overall in every draft.

My best teams always returned when I could get one of either Rodgers, Rivers, Warner, Romo, or McNabb as my QB in the round 4/5 loop around. However, in 2-3 out of the 6-7 drafts all those QBs were gone by that loop around. I was shocked.

Getting one of those QBs in the 4/5 loop around normally equated to a team like this:

QB - Donovan McNabb

RB - Adrian Peterson

RB - Thomas Jones

WR - Steve Smith

WR - Anquan Boldin

or

QB - Phillip Rivers

RB - Adrian Peterson

RB - Clinton Portis

WR - Roddy White

WR - DeSean Jackson

In drafts where the 2nd group of good QBs were all gone by the 4/5 loop around I would normally draft my to backup RB in place of the QB. Guys like Derrick Ward, Larry Johnson, and in some cases even Thomas Jones as a backup.

What I drew from this is that if a top QB is important to you (which it is to me) you are taking a small gamble that one will be available at the 4/5 loop around. I went back through some completed mocks that I was not part of and inputted who I would have picked being conservative to assure that I would get a top QB and I got Peyton Manning in every single draft.

The teams would normally end up looking like this:

QB - Peyton Manning

RB - Adrian Peterson

RB - Thomas Jones/Derrick Ward/Larry Johnson

WR - Anquan Boldin

WR - Hines Ward/DeSean Jackson/Antonio Bryant

Summary:

Best teams are when you can get a level 2 QB at the 4/5 loop around but it is a gamble. If you want to avoid the gamble, take Peyton Manning along with a WR or 2nd RB at the 2/3 loop around.

 
What if you had the #1, non-ppr, all TD's 6 points and start 2 QB's? ADP a no brainer but at 20-21 maybe consider a QB there? Brees/Brady are long gone.
I've played 2QB leagues for ten years. I would think about Brady or Brees at #1 in that format. Honestly. the value of a top QB in a 2QB league cannot be overlooked.
Even if it was start 2-4-4? First 7 picks in our league will be RB's for sure.
I have the 7th pick in a new dynasty league and think I will go with Calvin Johnson. I want a tier 1 player. Even in a redraft I may have went Calvin also. I would guess Fitz will be taking in your league within the first 7 pics
 
How about Marques Colston in about the 3rd round at 3.01? I have heard Brees is looking his way A LOT in practice..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How about Marques Colston in about the 3rd round at 3.01? I have heard Brees is looking his way A LOT in practice..
Sometimes he was available at 2/12 3/1 and sometimes he wasn't.There are some pair of the following guys available at the 2/3 turn:Steve SmithMarques ColstonAnquan BoldinRoddy WhiteGreg Jennings was available only once.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How about Marques Colston in about the 3rd round at 3.01? I have heard Brees is looking his way A LOT in practice..
Sometimes he was available at 2/12 3/1 and sometimes he wasn't.There are always one or two of the following guys available at the 2/3 turn:Steve SmithMarques ColstonAnquan BoldinRoddy WhiteGreg Jennings was available only once.
Out of those guys, which 2 have the best potential or are the safest picks? Smitty and White?
 
How about Marques Colston in about the 3rd round at 3.01? I have heard Brees is looking his way A LOT in practice..
Sometimes he was available at 2/12 3/1 and sometimes he wasn't.There are always one or two of the following guys available at the 2/3 turn:Steve SmithMarques ColstonAnquan BoldinRoddy WhiteGreg Jennings was available only once.
Out of those guys, which 2 have the best potential or are the safest picks? Smitty and White?
I say Smith and Boldin are the safest. They have both been studs for years and neither of them really has anything changed other than the offensive coordinator in ARZ. Same QBs, same opposite WR, etc.Colston is coming off surgery and White now has Tony G around who can either help him by taking pressure off him, or hurt him by stealing some of his production.I think Smith and Boldin have the highest floors so I would say they are the safest picks. JMO.
 
I went a little more unconventional...I took Turner #1 which I could explain if needed, but for now, I'll just give you the rest.

1.Turner

2. Reggie Wayne

3. Roddy White

4. Knowhawn Moreno

5. Braylon Edwards

6. Reggie Bush

I basically took the advice from one of the various articles I read on FBG and gambled a bit. (article "Maximizing Sleeper RB's by Waldman) http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2009/0...dman_gut157.php

If Edwards can be a shell of his 07' season, I could be set for one of the stonger WR corps in the league.

Now, on to the next gamble. If Moreno pans out, Turner and Moreno could be a deadly combo. Since everyone slipped on Bush, probably due to the micro fracture, I have a strong back up plan in the event Moreno stumbles or worse yet, holds out.

 
I cant stop thinking about who to take? You got AD or MJD at this spot. AD has virtually no passing game helping him out and MJD has Garrard who now has Torry Holt..both have pretty easy schedule as aforementioned..

 
Stryker said:
I cant stop thinking about who to take? You got AD or MJD at this spot. AD has virtually no passing game helping him out and MJD has Garrard who now has Torry Holt..both have pretty easy schedule as aforementioned..
I think at #1 you have to take the safest pick and imo the safest pick in the first round is ADP. Would it really be that much of a surprise to everyone if MJD broke down halfway through the season? I really think you have to take the proven commodity with the #1 overall pick. MJD has never been the "bellcow" back. no one knows how he is going to hold up under a full load.Everyone knows the old saying that you can't win your league in the first few rounds, but you can certainly lose it. This seems to be a classic example of this. I'm not down on MJD at all. The guy is one of my favorite players, but in the end you have to take the guy that's been there before at #1. There is no reason to take that risk at #1 overall.
 
Stryker said:
I cant stop thinking about who to take? You got AD or MJD at this spot. AD has virtually no passing game helping him out and MJD has Garrard who now has Torry Holt..both have pretty easy schedule as aforementioned..
I think at #1 you have to take the safest pick and imo the safest pick in the first round is ADP. Would it really be that much of a surprise to everyone if MJD broke down halfway through the season? I really think you have to take the proven commodity with the #1 overall pick. MJD has never been the "bellcow" back. no one knows how he is going to hold up under a full load.Everyone knows the old saying that you can't win your league in the first few rounds, but you can certainly lose it. This seems to be a classic example of this. I'm not down on MJD at all. The guy is one of my favorite players, but in the end you have to take the guy that's been there before at #1. There is no reason to take that risk at #1 overall.
Can someone explain to me why AP is the consensus #1? In my league in 2008 he was the #9 RB, in 2007 he was the #5 RB. He just doesn't catch enough balls. MJD in 2006 was #7, in 2007 was #13, and in 2008 was #4. That was in a time share. There is no more time share. His numbers should go UP. And yes it would be a suprise if he broke down. He's a professional athlete in the prime of his career. He has just as much of a chance of breaking down as AP does.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stryker said:
I cant stop thinking about who to take? You got AD or MJD at this spot. AD has virtually no passing game helping him out and MJD has Garrard who now has Torry Holt..both have pretty easy schedule as aforementioned..
I think at #1 you have to take the safest pick and imo the safest pick in the first round is ADP. Would it really be that much of a surprise to everyone if MJD broke down halfway through the season? I really think you have to take the proven commodity with the #1 overall pick. MJD has never been the "bellcow" back. no one knows how he is going to hold up under a full load.Everyone knows the old saying that you can't win your league in the first few rounds, but you can certainly lose it. This seems to be a classic example of this. I'm not down on MJD at all. The guy is one of my favorite players, but in the end you have to take the guy that's been there before at #1. There is no reason to take that risk at #1 overall.
Can someone explain to me why AP is the consensus #1? In my league in 2008 he was the #9 RB, in 2007 he was the #5 RB. He just doesn't catch enough balls. MJD in 2006 was #7, in 2007 was #13, and in 2008 was #4. That was in a time share. There is no more time share. His numbers should go UP. And yes it would be a suprise if he broke down. He's a professional athlete in the prime of his career. He has just as much of a chance of breaking down as AP does.
APs ceiling is 2000 yards and about 28 TDs...one of these years he WILL have a crazy year somewhere close to that...are you sure it won't be this year?
 
Stryker said:
I cant stop thinking about who to take? You got AD or MJD at this spot. AD has virtually no passing game helping him out and MJD has Garrard who now has Torry Holt..both have pretty easy schedule as aforementioned..
I think at #1 you have to take the safest pick and imo the safest pick in the first round is ADP. Would it really be that much of a surprise to everyone if MJD broke down halfway through the season? I really think you have to take the proven commodity with the #1 overall pick. MJD has never been the "bellcow" back. no one knows how he is going to hold up under a full load.Everyone knows the old saying that you can't win your league in the first few rounds, but you can certainly lose it. This seems to be a classic example of this. I'm not down on MJD at all. The guy is one of my favorite players, but in the end you have to take the guy that's been there before at #1. There is no reason to take that risk at #1 overall.
Can someone explain to me why AP is the consensus #1? In my league in 2008 he was the #9 RB, in 2007 he was the #5 RB. He just doesn't catch enough balls. MJD in 2006 was #7, in 2007 was #13, and in 2008 was #4. That was in a time share. There is no more time share. His numbers should go UP. And yes it would be a suprise if he broke down. He's a professional athlete in the prime of his career. He has just as much of a chance of breaking down as AP does.
APs ceiling is 2000 yards and about 28 TDs...one of these years he WILL have a crazy year somewhere close to that...are you sure it won't be this year?
Yes I am sure, because Chester Taylor is still wearing a Vikings uniform. As long as he is, AP will never break 20 td's.
 
Stryker said:
I cant stop thinking about who to take? You got AD or MJD at this spot. AD has virtually no passing game helping him out and MJD has Garrard who now has Torry Holt..both have pretty easy schedule as aforementioned..
I think at #1 you have to take the safest pick and imo the safest pick in the first round is ADP. Would it really be that much of a surprise to everyone if MJD broke down halfway through the season? I really think you have to take the proven commodity with the #1 overall pick. MJD has never been the "bellcow" back. no one knows how he is going to hold up under a full load.Everyone knows the old saying that you can't win your league in the first few rounds, but you can certainly lose it. This seems to be a classic example of this. I'm not down on MJD at all. The guy is one of my favorite players, but in the end you have to take the guy that's been there before at #1. There is no reason to take that risk at #1 overall.
Can someone explain to me why AP is the consensus #1? In my league in 2008 he was the #9 RB, in 2007 he was the #5 RB. He just doesn't catch enough balls. MJD in 2006 was #7, in 2007 was #13, and in 2008 was #4. That was in a time share. There is no more time share. His numbers should go UP. And yes it would be a suprise if he broke down. He's a professional athlete in the prime of his career. He has just as much of a chance of breaking down as AP does.
APs ceiling is 2000 yards and about 28 TDs...one of these years he WILL have a crazy year somewhere close to that...are you sure it won't be this year?
Yes I am sure, because Chester Taylor is still wearing a Vikings uniform. As long as he is, AP will never break 20 td's.
But AP has very few question marks. He's never had a good passing game. And he's always had Chester.He is basically a lock for a top 10 finish, and that is safe. 1st round lots of people go safe.
 
I'm in a 12-team, PPR, 6 points for all TDs, 2RB/2WR/1TE

Is considering Witten at 2.12/3.1 turn a horrible idea? A recent kffl.com article puts him ranked around Greg Jennings and Steve Smith.

1.1 MJD

2.12 Witten

3.1 Maybe Manning if he falls?

:lmao:

4.12 TO?

5.1 Ochocino?

I HATE getting stuck with a horrible TE, and Witten is such a sure thing.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Darko M said:
I'm in a 12-team, PPR, 6 points for all TDs, 2RB/2WR/1TE Is considering Witten at 2.12/3.1 turn a horrible idea? A recent kffl.com article puts him ranked around Greg Jennings and Steve Smith.1.1 MJD2.12 Witten3.1 Maybe Manning if he falls?:thumbup:4.12 TO?5.1 Ochocino?I HATE getting stuck with a horrible TE, and Witten is such a sure thing.
I say no way. Witten takes some huge shots, guy's gonna miss a nice chunk of games one of these years.
 
I have done a bunch of mocks and WR/WR at the 2/3 turn is great. You get 2 stud WR to pair with AP. There is depth at RB this year so you can go RB with 3 of your next 4 picks and have great depth. I htink the 1st pick is the best place to draft this year.

 
Darko M said:
I'm in a 12-team, PPR, 6 points for all TDs, 2RB/2WR/1TE Is considering Witten at 2.12/3.1 turn a horrible idea? A recent kffl.com article puts him ranked around Greg Jennings and Steve Smith.1.1 MJD2.12 Witten3.1 Maybe Manning if he falls?:grad:4.12 TO?5.1 Ochocino?I HATE getting stuck with a horrible TE, and Witten is such a sure thing.
I say no way. Witten takes some huge shots, guy's gonna miss a nice chunk of games one of these years.
He has played through shoulder separation, broken jaw, and broken ribs.What injury do you think he gets that will sideline him?
 
I had #1 and took AP. We are on pick #19. Slaton, Manning, Wayne and S.Smith still available. I'm hoping to get Slaton and Wayne.

 
I had #1 and took AP. We are on pick #19. Slaton, Manning, Wayne and S.Smith still available. I'm hoping to get Slaton and Wayne.
If Steve Smith is there before Wayne, you gotta take Smith. More points, mor yards, etc...in less games. Guy is simply unstoppable.
 
"Can someone explain to me why AP is the consensus #1? "

In my PPR league last year..Turner was #1, ADP #2..2 guys that don't catch the ball.

Edit: and Deangelo ws #3..go figure

 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Can someone explain to me why AP is the consensus #1? "

In my PPR league last year..Turner was #1, ADP #2..2 guys that don't catch the ball.

Edit: and Deangelo ws #3..go figure
Not sure how your scoring is, but in standard PPR scoring, in 2008 it was:1) DWill

2) Forte

3) Turner

4) MJD

5) LT

6) T Jones

7) Slaton

8) Westbrook

9) ADP

10) CJ3

go figure..

 
"Can someone explain to me why AP is the consensus #1? "In my PPR league last year..Turner was #1, ADP #2..2 guys that don't catch the ball.Edit: and Deangelo ws #3..go figure
I'll take a shot at it. Process of elimination.MJD - hasn't proven to me he can handle being a workhorse back. How will he hold up over an entire season? Not willing to spend the #1 pick to see. He could very well be the consensus #1 next year though. Turner - Before last year he hasn't had over 100 carries in a season. I think he is going to slow down this year after last years heavy workload. This is just my opinion and you may disagree. Forte - 3.9 ypc. His receiving skills save his fantasy value but not enough for the #1 pick.Tomlinson? - NoADP - Great ypc, 10-100yd games last year, Has produced 2 years in a row, hasn't even hit his prime. I think he has a HUGE ceiling. This is the main reason I want him. He can single handedly win me a championship! I can't say that about anyone else.
 
In the middle of a 12 team draft with #1 pick...went MJD 1st...but when it came back to me at 24th pick Portis was still available! TYVM drafters!

This was actually a 3rd Round Reverse pick so I didn't get to go again until 36/37. I went with Marshall and Witten there.

 
12 team performance league with 6 pts/all TDs. Lineup gives me some wiggle room as we start QB/RB/WR/flex/flex and no TE. Here's my strategy from the 1 spot...

ADP is my guy. It's about safety and being closest to a sure thing. He isn't guaranteed to finish the season as RB1, but he's less likely than any other possible #1 pick to screw me over.

There are 15 RBs who I would consider taking at 2.12/3.1 (well, AP and 14 others: MJD, Turner, Forte, SJax, DWilliams, CJohnson, Gore, Portis, Slaton, LT, Westbrook, MB3, Jacobs and RBrown, not necessarily in that order). If any of these guys fall, I go RB/WR. If not, I go WR/WR. Either way, I should have 3 studs to start the draft. If I wind up going WR/WR at this point and being weak at RB2, I only have to start one RB.

QBs go early in my league. I wouldn't be surprised if 3 go in the first round (last year Romo went at #6 as QB3) and 3-4 more before I pick at 2.12. this makes my decision on a QB very easy: I'm gonna be one of the last owners to take a QB. The last three years in a row, I've done very well by waiting, getting "stuck" with CPalmer at 5.1, Romo at 5.9, and Cutler at 6.7, all in their breakout years. I obviously got lucky with these three picks, but the strategy (as preached by Footballguys in general and David Dodds in particular) is very sound. Find a tier of QBs who are quality starters with upside, wait until a third to a half of them are drafted, then pounce with your next pick. Concentrate on the trigger rather than the actual pick (that's why I was able to wait until the 6th round for Cutler last year, because my target QBs went off the board a little slower than usual). This year, my targets are the third tier of QBs, and it's a big group...Warner, Ryan, Cutler, Palmer, Schaub, Ben, Garrard and possibly Cassel, Orton and Hasselbeck. Usually, I'd wait until any 4 of these guys are drafted, then grab my highest ranked QB with my next pick. That's hard to do from the #1 spot because there's a good chance of getting screwed: If you pass on QB at 4.12/5.1 because none of the target QBs have been picked yet, there are still 22 picks before the next opportunity at 6.12, and there's a reasonable chance that a huge run on QBs occurs in the 5th and 6th rounds, leaving you with the likes of Pennington, Eli and Flacco. That's why I grabbed Palmer at 5.1 three years ago, even though it was a little bit of a reach. So with the two picks at 4.12 and 5.1, one will be an example of leading (taking my highest ranked QB even if it's a bit of a reach) and the other will be an example of following (taking the best value that falls to this pick at RB or WR).

At 6.12/7.1, I need to do 2 of 3 things: first, grab a dependable RB/WR to serve as my fourth starter during bye weeks; second, depending who I took as my starting QB, take a 2nd QB (hopefully one left undrafted from my target tier of QBs) who may break out and actually become my starter or at least trade bait; or third, if I hold off on a backup QB because the value has already been drafted, a high-upside RB/WR who may become this year's Slaton.

The second half of the draft is all about handcuffs, high upside, a top six or seven defense, and a kicker in the last round who plays in a dome for a high octane offense.

Naturally, there has to be a balance between having a plan, and being flexible enough to shift gears if unusual things happen during the draft, be they good or bad.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In mocks I'm seeing it sort of shape out like this for me:

1. Peterson

2. Barber

3. S. Smith

4. Welker

5. Houshmanzadeh

6. R. Bush

7. A. Rodgers

8. Holmes

9. G. Olsen

10. D. Brown (Indy)

11. L. Moore

12. Breaston

13. Mendenhall

14. L. Washington

15. Chargers D

16. Rackers

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top