Went Schaub week 1, Garrard Week 2, going back to Schaub week 3 so Garrard should be huge.I know that there was a lot of debate last week about his final line, but this may be another good start for him this week. What say you?
+1Went Schaub week 1, Garrard Week 2, going back to Schaub week 3 so Garrard should be huge.I know that there was a lot of debate last week about his final line, but this may be another good start for him this week. What say you?
Is this where the chump line forms?+2+1Went Schaub week 1, Garrard Week 2, going back to Schaub week 3 so Garrard should be huge.I know that there was a lot of debate last week about his final line, but this may be another good start for him this week. What say you?
Is this where the chump line forms?+2+1Went Schaub week 1, Garrard Week 2, going back to Schaub week 3 so Garrard should be huge.I know that there was a lot of debate last week about his final line, but this may be another good start for him this week. What say you?
That's brave. Even though the Titans have been giving up passing yards, I don't think I'll play Sanchez until Week 4 vs New Orleans.I have Garrard but I picked up Kolb to play him just this one week.But I dumped him back into the waiver wire and replaced him by Sanchez who is facing.... The Titans. I also prefer Sanchez's upside to Garrard's.
Might also pick up Sanchez. Anyone else deciding on a guy like Sanchez in lieu of Garrard?Slotted in Garrard for an injured McNabb and I have to admit that he did rather well. But I dumped him back into the waiver wire and replaced him by Sanchez who is facing.... The Titans. I also prefer Sanchez's upside to Garrard's.
Me too. I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who's crazy.Is this where the chump line forms?+2+1Went Schaub week 1, Garrard Week 2, going back to Schaub week 3 so Garrard should be huge.I know that there was a lot of debate last week about his final line, but this may be another good start for him this week. What say you?Did the exact same thing. We should form a support group.
I guess I am in the minorityin thinking that Garrard will have a good week.Chunky Soup said:Might also pick up Sanchez. Anyone else deciding on a guy like Sanchez in lieu of Garrard?brindrod said:Slotted in Garrard for an injured McNabb and I have to admit that he did rather well. But I dumped him back into the waiver wire and replaced him by Sanchez who is facing.... The Titans. I also prefer Sanchez's upside to Garrard's.
I want to believe this. Only thing that worries me is that a lot of his fantasy points were in junk time. That's not something you can really bank on.I guess I am in the minorityin thinking that Garrard will have a good week.Chunky Soup said:Might also pick up Sanchez. Anyone else deciding on a guy like Sanchez in lieu of Garrard?brindrod said:Slotted in Garrard for an injured McNabb and I have to admit that he did rather well. But I dumped him back into the waiver wire and replaced him by Sanchez who is facing.... The Titans. I also prefer Sanchez's upside to Garrard's.
Regardless, he still put up the points. Couldn't you conclude that if the offense sucks agin that he would once again get garbage time stats? A lot of RB's get garbage time stats as well if their team is up. Are those discounted?I want to believe this. Only thing that worries me is that a lot of his fantasy points were in junk time. That's not something you can really bank on.I guess I am in the minorityin thinking that Garrard will have a good week.Chunky Soup said:Might also pick up Sanchez. Anyone else deciding on a guy like Sanchez in lieu of Garrard?brindrod said:Slotted in Garrard for an injured McNabb and I have to admit that he did rather well. But I dumped him back into the waiver wire and replaced him by Sanchez who is facing.... The Titans. I also prefer Sanchez's upside to Garrard's.
Not saying its discounted, but you need the right things to fall in place. What if the D holds up this game? What if MDJ breaks for a TD run or two to keep it close? In those situations, you won't be getting the play-from-behind type stuff.Regardless, he still put up the points. Couldn't you conclude that if the offense sucks agin that he would once again get garbage time stats? A lot of RB's get garbage time stats as well if their team is up. Are those discounted?I want to believe this. Only thing that worries me is that a lot of his fantasy points were in junk time. That's not something you can really bank on.I guess I am in the minorityin thinking that Garrard will have a good week.Chunky Soup said:Might also pick up Sanchez. Anyone else deciding on a guy like Sanchez in lieu of Garrard?brindrod said:Slotted in Garrard for an injured McNabb and I have to admit that he did rather well. But I dumped him back into the waiver wire and replaced him by Sanchez who is facing.... The Titans. I also prefer Sanchez's upside to Garrard's.
McNabb owner who is probably plugging in T.Edwards vs. NO and leaving Garrard on the bench. If TEd works out, Garrard goes to the Wire. I prefer some upside with my QBs.brindrod said:Slotted in Garrard for an injured McNabb and I have to admit that he did rather well. But I dumped him back into the waiver wire and replaced him by Sanchez who is facing.... The Titans. I also prefer Sanchez's upside to Garrard's.
wow.. bold statement after Garrard's huge week 1 performance. I'm guessing you won based on everything but the QB position.. I also have Garrard in both of my leagues but really don't trust him at all. I hope I'm wrong but he looks off..Who's your other QB?All I saying is that I am 2-0 with Garrard as my starting QB for both weeks. If you followed Dodds advice, you would not have an issue.
THe only other QB on my roster is Edwards. The point I was making is that I loaded up at the other positions and really have not needed Garrard to perform.wow.. bold statement after Garrard's huge week 1 performance. I'm guessing you won based on everything but the QB position.. I also have Garrard in both of my leagues but really don't trust him at all. I hope I'm wrong but he looks off..Who's your other QB?All I saying is that I am 2-0 with Garrard as my starting QB for both weeks. If you followed Dodds advice, you would not have an issue.
me too. 2-0, Garrard and Edwards, rest of roster is rock-solid. I hope it doesn't catch up to me. There are no other QBs out there to replace them.THe only other QB on my roster is Edwards. The point I was making is that I loaded up at the other positions and really have not needed Garrard to perform.wow.. bold statement after Garrard's huge week 1 performance. I'm guessing you won based on everything but the QB position.. I also have Garrard in both of my leagues but really don't trust him at all. I hope I'm wrong but he looks off..Who's your other QB?All I saying is that I am 2-0 with Garrard as my starting QB for both weeks. If you followed Dodds advice, you would not have an issue.
:whoosh: Apparently he hasn't looked at that "one number."Offensive coordinator Dirk Koetter says he isn't concerned that his offense is 23rd in the league. Koetter: "I look at one number - wins and losses.''
![]()
Dude, you are ZERO - 2 so far this year. This guy is a complete idiot.
+??????6+1Went Schaub week 1, Garrard Week 2, going back to Schaub week 3 so Garrard should be huge.I know that there was a lot of debate last week about his final line, but this may be another good start for him this week. What say you?