Andy Hicks
Footballguy
This will be pinned once the game starts
Okay, but are they really a playoff team? They have been awfully inconsistent this season so far to just assume that they will the game they need to to get to the playoffs.Baltimore's basically got a 9 game playoff run in front of them & this is one they have to win.
I read this twice and am still not sure what you mean. My point was that the Ravens have no margin for error, given their record and the records of their peers - so that every game going forward is a playoff game for them.Okay, but are they really a playoff team? They have been awfully inconsistent this season so far to just assume that they will the game they need to to get to the playoffs.Baltimore's basically got a 9 game playoff run in front of them & this is one they have to win.
I'm sure their eyes are open. How can you commit pass interferance with your eyes closed?Is Baltimore playing defense with their eyes closed?
Was kinda a figure of speech....I am sure you right, their eyes are IN FACT open.I'm sure their eyes are open. How can you commit pass interferance with your eyes closed?Is Baltimore playing defense with their eyes closed?
Broke his arm. Could see the break, it looked nasty.Anyone see the Chris Henry injury? How bad did it look?
Injury Thread reporting Broken ArmAnyone see the Chris Henry injury? How bad did it look?
I read this twice and am still not sure what you mean.Okay, but are they really a playoff team? They have been awfully inconsistent this season so far to just assume that they will the game they need to to get to the playoffs.Baltimore's basically got a 9 game playoff run in front of them & this is one they have to win.

I just meant that it seems like people sometimes take the use the "they need to win this game, so they will" reasoning as a reason why a team will win a game. My point was, Baltimore hasn't looked like a playoff team this year so far, so I wouldn't assume that they will win a game they apparently need to to increase their playoff chances (like today, as a loss will put them basically three back of the Bengals).I read this twice and am still not sure what you mean. My point was that the Ravens have no margin for error, given their record and the records of their peers - so that every game going forward is a playoff game for them.Okay, but are they really a playoff team? They have been awfully inconsistent this season so far to just assume that they will the game they need to to get to the playoffs.Baltimore's basically got a 9 game playoff run in front of them & this is one they have to win.
I'm very surprised seeing something like this coming from a Broncos fan...I just meant that it seems like people sometimes take the use the "they need to win this game, so they will" reasoning as a reason why a team will win a game. My point was, Baltimore hasn't looked like a playoff team this year so far, so I wouldn't assume that they will win a game they apparently need to to increase their playoff chances (like today, as a loss will put them basically three back of the Bengals).I read this twice and am still not sure what you mean. My point was that the Ravens have no margin for error, given their record and the records of their peers - so that every game going forward is a playoff game for them.Okay, but are they really a playoff team? They have been awfully inconsistent this season so far to just assume that they will the game they need to to get to the playoffs.Baltimore's basically got a 9 game playoff run in front of them & this is one they have to win.
Not so fast my friendWas kinda a figure of speech....I am sure you right, their eyes are IN FACT open.I'm sure their eyes are open. How can you commit pass interferance with your eyes closed?Is Baltimore playing defense with their eyes closed?
Please state your serious question.Serious question. Ocho Cinco had a foot down and then a heel down in bounds. His toes came down out of bounds after his heel hit inbounds. So he had a foot and a heel in bounds.
Just saying shouldn't it have been a catch? Lol didn't realize I didn't ask a question.Please state your serious question.Serious question. Ocho Cinco had a foot down and then a heel down in bounds. His toes came down out of bounds after his heel hit inbounds. So he had a foot and a heel in bounds.
You didn't. You made a statement. And no that's not a catch. 2 WHOLE footies need to be in..Just saying shouldn't it have been a catch? Lol didn't realize I didn't ask a question.Please state your serious question.Serious question. Ocho Cinco had a foot down and then a heel down in bounds. His toes came down out of bounds after his heel hit inbounds. So he had a foot and a heel in bounds.
Then how is it different than a receiver dragging their toes?You didn't. You made a statement. And no that's not a catch. 2 WHOLE footies need to be in..Just saying shouldn't it have been a catch? Lol didn't realize I didn't ask a question.Please state your serious question.Serious question. Ocho Cinco had a foot down and then a heel down in bounds. His toes came down out of bounds after his heel hit inbounds. So he had a foot and a heel in bounds.
So if a receiver taps his toes in the back of the endzone but doesn't get his whole foot in-bounds, it's not a catch?You didn't. You made a statement. And no that's not a catch. 2 WHOLE footies need to be in..Just saying shouldn't it have been a catch? Lol didn't realize I didn't ask a question.Please state your serious question.Serious question. Ocho Cinco had a foot down and then a heel down in bounds. His toes came down out of bounds after his heel hit inbounds. So he had a foot and a heel in bounds.

Toes count as whole footies..Heels don't..Then how is it different than a receiver dragging their toes?You didn't. You made a statement. And no that's not a catch. 2 WHOLE footies need to be in..Just saying shouldn't it have been a catch? Lol didn't realize I didn't ask a question.Please state your serious question.Serious question. Ocho Cinco had a foot down and then a heel down in bounds. His toes came down out of bounds after his heel hit inbounds. So he had a foot and a heel in bounds.
Interesting...I didn't know thatToes count as whole footies..Heels don't..
Yea I stated that wrong. Toes count as whole feet kinda like knees count as feet.So if a receiver taps his toes in the back of the endzone but doesn't get his whole foot in-bounds, it's not a catch?You didn't. You made a statement. And no that's not a catch. 2 WHOLE footies need to be in..Just saying shouldn't it have been a catch? Lol didn't realize I didn't ask a question.Please state your serious question.Serious question. Ocho Cinco had a foot down and then a heel down in bounds. His toes came down out of bounds after his heel hit inbounds. So he had a foot and a heel in bounds.![]()
Bribing the refs is good shtick.Chad Johnson had a dollar in his hand during that review? At what point did he think that was a good idea. He was hovering around the refs with money.
I've never seen someone drag their heels, but I didn't know the ruling on this. Thanks.Actually, heels do count as whole footies...If he had landed on his heel then picked up his foot and put his toe down OOB then that is a foot in....
Ya, it would be tough to do....but it would be the exact same thing.I've never seen someone drag their heels, but I didn't know the ruling on this. Thanks.Actually, heels do count as whole footies...If he had landed on his heel then picked up his foot and put his toe down OOB then that is a foot in....
You can tap your heels and it counts too. It's not "toes are whole feet and heels aren't." If the heel is all that touches, and it's in, you're in. If the toe is all that touches and is in, you're in. If part of the foot comes down OOB, you're out. If he had tapped his heel in and didn't put his whole foot down, leaving his toe out it would have been good.Serious question. Ocho Cinco had a foot down and then a heel down in bounds. His toes came down out of bounds after his heel hit inbounds. So he had a foot and a heel in bounds.
and how many times to you see that happen? If he comes down on his heel the toes are gonna come down with it and most likely OOB if it's close to the line.Actually, heels do count as whole footies...If he had landed on his heel then picked up his foot and put his toe down OOB then that is a foot in....
You've seen it many times on the back line of the endzone. Lands on his butt after thumping the heels down.I've never seen someone drag their heels, but I didn't know the ruling on this. Thanks.Actually, heels do count as whole footies...If he had landed on his heel then picked up his foot and put his toe down OOB then that is a foot in....
Technically yes that's correct, but as I stated in my other post, you never see someone just "tap" their heels down and manage to keep their toes in the air.You can tap your heels and it counts too. It's not "toes are whole feet and heels aren't." If the heel is all that touches, and it's in, you're in. If the toe is all that touches and is in, you're in. If part of the foot comes down OOB, you're out. If he had tapped his heel in and didn't put his whole foot down, leaving his toe out it would have been good.Serious question. Ocho Cinco had a foot down and then a heel down in bounds. His toes came down out of bounds after his heel hit inbounds. So he had a foot and a heel in bounds.
Yes you do.Technically yes that's correct, but as I stated in my other post, you never see someone just "tap" their heels down and manage to keep their toes in the air.You can tap your heels and it counts too. It's not "toes are whole feet and heels aren't." If the heel is all that touches, and it's in, you're in. If the toe is all that touches and is in, you're in. If part of the foot comes down OOB, you're out. If he had tapped his heel in and didn't put his whole foot down, leaving his toe out it would have been good.Serious question. Ocho Cinco had a foot down and then a heel down in bounds. His toes came down out of bounds after his heel hit inbounds. So he had a foot and a heel in bounds.
What a joke. He is terrible.Bengals are blowing this game. Need a FG miss here to save their skins.
Not really. That strip by Reed was pretty amazing, and a somewhat dumb play by Chad. Before then their O had a nice sense of urgency.Their secondary continues to own Baltimore. Too bad their LBs aren't containing the checkdown to Rice in the second half.Bengals are blowing this game. Need a FG miss here to save their skins.