This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
And I can't see R.McClain going #1 in any scenario other than some crazy scoring system that gives 10 points per tackle.
He sure didn't look heavy on the sprts science show. 16 MPH (J. Best was tops at 18), accelerates to top speed at 7 yards (which, funny enough, is ideal because he will be playing in formations that line up 7 yards off the line of scrimmage), and rediculous 38 degree cutting angles (translates into tremendous side agility explosion).I don't know what "tape" you saw (usually unless you work in the industry or something, you're like the rest of us and you mean "TV" or "internet stream"....Tape is very different), but in timed arenas, his straight line and agile speed appears to be very good.
I'll add Best next time, in the other polls I've done of only offense, Best wasn't one of the first 2 off the board for Non PPR, and I felt the need to add the top IDP guy, need to have at least one.And I can't see R.McClain going #1 in any scenario other than some crazy scoring system that gives 10 points per tackle.
Why?
No, because RBs are relatively much more valuable than QBs.
Ryan Matthews, easily has no competition for the starting gig ( Sproles? c'mon now)has a terrific supporting cast and a coach who knows a thing or two about productive running games..
Yeah, but in 10 years it's more likely that Bradford is on a roster than Mathews.
Both are less than Bryant for 10.
Yes, but that doesn't matter. Better to have a great RB for 7 years than an average QB for 10 years. If you think Bradford is the next Peyton Manning then he is worth the 1.1 in a dynasty draft. If he is only going to be ok to good, you have to go for a RB first.
No really I only play PPR leagues
