Jump to content


Photo

World War Z


  • Please log in to reply
451 replies to this topic

#1 Buddy Ball 2K3

Buddy Ball 2K3

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9,560 posts
  • Joined 22-July 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 July 2010 - 04:25 AM

Link

For anyone who's read Max Brooks' World War Z or his earlier The Zombie Survival Guide, a big-screen adaptation seemed, if not inevitable due to the problems inherent in adapting Brooks' episodic novel, then at least likely, especially with the continuing exploitation of the zombie sub-genre, e.g., The Walking Dead, a small-screen adaptation of Robert Kirkman's long-running comic-book series (a six-part first season will air on AMC later this year) and last fall's commercially and critically successful zombie-comedy (or "zom-com"), Zombieland. MTV's Rick Marshall has word that Brad Pitt has officially agreed to star in the World War Z adaptation, scheduled for a summer 2012 release.

If you haven't followed World War Z's progress from novel to (potentially) big screen closely, here's a brief summary:

Brad Pitt optioned World War Z from Brooks for his production company, Plan B Entertainment, three years ago. Pitt gave adaptation duties to J. Michael Straczynski, best known among science-fiction fans for creating, producing, and writing Babylon 5 and, among comic-book readers, a multi-year run writing The Amazing Spider-Man for Marvel Comics (Straczynski's currently writing Superman and Wonder Woman for DC Comics). Straczynski became a hot property after Clint Eastwood selected Straczynski's Changeling script to direct with Angelina Jolie in the lead role three years ago.

For the adaptation (later revised by Matthew Michael Carnahan), Straczynski had to find a way to tie the interview-based, multi-character novel (it's subtitled An Oral History of the Zombie War) into an overarching story arc. Straczynski created a new character, a journalist, presumably the character Pitt will now play. Both the novel and the screenplay follow the general rules for the sub-genre that George A. Romero defined (or rather re-defined) 42 years ago with Night of the Living Dead (e.g., a worldwide plague, ravenous, cannibalistic undead), but on a much larger, even epic scope. A longtime fan of the sub-genre, Brooks thought through the global implications of a rapidly spreading, nearly unstoppable plague. His novel focuses, disaster-style, on both the micro (personal) level and the macro (government/military response), pieced together through a series of interviews with the survivors.

Plan B Entertainment also picked up options on The Zombie Survival Guide and a related graphic novel, The Zombie Survival Guide: Recorded Attacks. Additional information,( e.g., director, other cast members, start date, budget, locations, rating, etc.) isn't available, yet, but hopefully we'll hear more about World War Z over the next few days as San Diego Comic-Con ramps up.

Are you excited/unexcited for a big-screen adaptation of World War Z? Who would you like to see direct? Who else would you like to see in the cast? Would you accept a PG-13 rating to lower the risk for a potentially expensive production (all those locations, undead hordes, big action scenes) or is an R-rating non-negotiable?


Edited by Buddy Ball 2K3, 11 February 2013 - 11:50 AM.

What you've just said ... is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul..




#2 pantherclub

pantherclub

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,165 posts
  • Joined 01-June 04

Posted 23 July 2010 - 04:40 AM

Link

For anyone who's read Max Brooks' World War Z or his earlier The Zombie Survival Guide, a big-screen adaptation seemed, if not inevitable due to the problems inherent in adapting Brooks' episodic novel, then at least likely, especially with the continuing exploitation of the zombie sub-genre, e.g., The Walking Dead, a small-screen adaptation of Robert Kirkman's long-running comic-book series (a six-part first season will air on AMC later this year) and last fall's commercially and critically successful zombie-comedy (or "zom-com"), Zombieland. MTV's Rick Marshall has word that Brad Pitt has officially agreed to star in the World War Z adaptation, scheduled for a summer 2012 release.

If you haven't followed World War Z's progress from novel to (potentially) big screen closely, here's a brief summary:

Brad Pitt optioned World War Z from Brooks for his production company, Plan B Entertainment, three years ago. Pitt gave adaptation duties to J. Michael Straczynski, best known among science-fiction fans for creating, producing, and writing Babylon 5 and, among comic-book readers, a multi-year run writing The Amazing Spider-Man for Marvel Comics (Straczynski's currently writing Superman and Wonder Woman for DC Comics). Straczynski became a hot property after Clint Eastwood selected Straczynski's Changeling script to direct with Angelina Jolie in the lead role three years ago.

For the adaptation (later revised by Matthew Michael Carnahan), Straczynski had to find a way to tie the interview-based, multi-character novel (it's subtitled An Oral History of the Zombie War) into an overarching story arc. Straczynski created a new character, a journalist, presumably the character Pitt will now play. Both the novel and the screenplay follow the general rules for the sub-genre that George A. Romero defined (or rather re-defined) 42 years ago with Night of the Living Dead (e.g., a worldwide plague, ravenous, cannibalistic undead), but on a much larger, even epic scope. A longtime fan of the sub-genre, Brooks thought through the global implications of a rapidly spreading, nearly unstoppable plague. His novel focuses, disaster-style, on both the micro (personal) level and the macro (government/military response), pieced together through a series of interviews with the survivors.

Plan B Entertainment also picked up options on The Zombie Survival Guide and a related graphic novel, The Zombie Survival Guide: Recorded Attacks. Additional information,( e.g., director, other cast members, start date, budget, locations, rating, etc.) isn't available, yet, but hopefully we'll hear more about World War Z over the next few days as San Diego Comic-Con ramps up.

Are you excited/unexcited for a big-screen adaptation of World War Z? Who would you like to see direct? Who else would you like to see in the cast? Would you accept a PG-13 rating to lower the risk for a potentially expensive production (all those locations, undead hordes, big action scenes) or is an R-rating non-negotiable?

How can he star? Isnt it a book with a bunch of different stories about the Zombie war that is tied together? Unless he is the reporter but there is no action for that dude.

#3 Uruk-Hai

Uruk-Hai

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 14,411 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Location:Woodstock, VA

Posted 23 July 2010 - 04:42 AM

It'll be interesting to see how they do this while staying true to the book - or if they're even going to try. Part of the allure of Brooks' book is the format and I wouldn't think that that format would work well in a stand-alone 2-3 hour film. I think it would do better as a series.

#4 shake zula

shake zula

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 11,630 posts
  • Joined 25-February 05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 July 2010 - 04:42 AM

Great book.
It is the Broodwich, forged in darkness from wheat harvested in Hell's half-acre, baked by Beelzebub, slathered with mayonnaise beaten from the evil eggs of dark chicken forced into sauce by the hands of a one-eyed madman, cheese boiled from the rancid teat of a fanged cow, layered with six-hundred and sixty-six separate meats from an animal which has maggots for blood!

#5 jamny

jamny

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 26,780 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY

Posted 23 July 2010 - 04:44 AM

WWZ can't be done in a 2 hour movie. They missed their chance to do it as a series with the upcoming Walking Dead coming out on AMC beating them to the punch.

#6 goonsquad

goonsquad

    Think different.

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9,573 posts
  • Joined 04-October 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:1 Infinite Loop

Posted 23 July 2010 - 04:57 AM

WWZ can't be done in a 2 hour movie. They missed their chance to do it as a series with the upcoming Walking Dead coming out on AMC beating them to the punch.

I agree. The scope of the book is so large even if they focus on just the political and military story lines they'd be better off breaking it into two or three movies. I hope they do this right, WWZ is one of my top books.
Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The trouble-makers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules, and they have no respect for the status-quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify, or vilify them. But the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.

1936, 1937, 1943, 1950, 1952, 1954, 1955, 1997, 1998, 2002, 2008


If I am the coach I want the RB backed by the devil.


#7 Lehigh98

Lehigh98

    Footballguy

  • Street Team
  • Pip
  • 10,361 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Macungie, PA
  • Interests:Things that are interesting

Posted 23 July 2010 - 04:59 AM

"adaptation" = lots of leeway May just take their favorite 2-3-4 entries and run with those.
Ad Free Since '93

#8 Lehigh98

Lehigh98

    Footballguy

  • Street Team
  • Pip
  • 10,361 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Macungie, PA
  • Interests:Things that are interesting

Posted 23 July 2010 - 05:00 AM

If they just take a few entries, which would you most want to see them use?
Ad Free Since '93

#9 PatsWillWin

PatsWillWin

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 11,492 posts
  • Joined 15-April 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston

Posted 23 July 2010 - 05:10 AM

No way this movie will be as good as I want it to be.

I demand my right to mockery and derision!!!

Fine. So I'm a blowhard.

But don't think for a minute that this is over. It may fizzle, yes. It may not materialize into a serious strain this Fall or Winter. It may not merge with other viruses... But it may.


#10 badmojo1006

badmojo1006

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,610 posts
  • Joined 19-November 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Breathing

Posted 23 July 2010 - 05:11 AM

Link

For anyone who's read Max Brooks' World War Z or his earlier The Zombie Survival Guide, a big-screen adaptation seemed, if not inevitable due to the problems inherent in adapting Brooks' episodic novel, then at least likely, especially with the continuing exploitation of the zombie sub-genre, e.g., The Walking Dead, a small-screen adaptation of Robert Kirkman's long-running comic-book series (a six-part first season will air on AMC later this year) and last fall's commercially and critically successful zombie-comedy (or "zom-com"), Zombieland. MTV's Rick Marshall has word that Brad Pitt has officially agreed to star in the World War Z adaptation, scheduled for a summer 2012 release.

If you haven't followed World War Z's progress from novel to (potentially) big screen closely, here's a brief summary:

Brad Pitt optioned World War Z from Brooks for his production company, Plan B Entertainment, three years ago. Pitt gave adaptation duties to J. Michael Straczynski, best known among science-fiction fans for creating, producing, and writing Babylon 5 and, among comic-book readers, a multi-year run writing The Amazing Spider-Man for Marvel Comics (Straczynski's currently writing Superman and Wonder Woman for DC Comics). Straczynski became a hot property after Clint Eastwood selected Straczynski's Changeling script to direct with Angelina Jolie in the lead role three years ago.

For the adaptation (later revised by Matthew Michael Carnahan), Straczynski had to find a way to tie the interview-based, multi-character novel (it's subtitled An Oral History of the Zombie War) into an overarching story arc. Straczynski created a new character, a journalist, presumably the character Pitt will now play. Both the novel and the screenplay follow the general rules for the sub-genre that George A. Romero defined (or rather re-defined) 42 years ago with Night of the Living Dead (e.g., a worldwide plague, ravenous, cannibalistic undead), but on a much larger, even epic scope. A longtime fan of the sub-genre, Brooks thought through the global implications of a rapidly spreading, nearly unstoppable plague. His novel focuses, disaster-style, on both the micro (personal) level and the macro (government/military response), pieced together through a series of interviews with the survivors.

Plan B Entertainment also picked up options on The Zombie Survival Guide and a related graphic novel, The Zombie Survival Guide: Recorded Attacks. Additional information,( e.g., director, other cast members, start date, budget, locations, rating, etc.) isn't available, yet, but hopefully we'll hear more about World War Z over the next few days as San Diego Comic-Con ramps up.

Are you excited/unexcited for a big-screen adaptation of World War Z? Who would you like to see direct? Who else would you like to see in the cast? Would you accept a PG-13 rating to lower the risk for a potentially expensive production (all those locations, undead hordes, big action scenes) or is an R-rating non-negotiable?

How can he star? Isnt it a book with a bunch of different stories about the Zombie war that is tied together? Unless he is the reporter but there is no action for that dude.

I am guessing he will be Todd Waino who has a prominent role in the book with a lot of action.

And I agree with the other posters, i had hoped it would be a mini series on HBO. There is just too much for a 2 or 2 1/2 hour movie
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. - Inigo Montoya

#11 badmojo1006

badmojo1006

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,610 posts
  • Joined 19-November 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Breathing

Posted 23 July 2010 - 05:14 AM

If they just take a few entries, which would you most want to see them use?

Of course would have the Battle of Yonkers and Hope New Mexico. And I would hope they have the Chinese Submarine and the battle in the Catacombs under Paris would be very creepy. And I hope they get Alan Alda for Arthur Sinclair. He was fantastic in the audio book.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. - Inigo Montoya

#12 Nick Vermeil

Nick Vermeil

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,831 posts
  • Joined 24-May 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn

Posted 23 July 2010 - 05:16 AM

This is going to disappoint. The book is very good but there is way too much going on for a movie. I think the best way to do it would be to drop the "oral history" aspect of the book and inter cut the stories of about 6-7 characters. It will be a disaster if they try to stay true to the book so I hope that don't even try. It would be like taking the first 15 minutes of "District 9" and stretching it out over an entire movie.

(Fennis @ Feb 2 2010, 01:55 PM) I searched for dick. my mistake.


#13 jamny

jamny

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 26,780 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY

Posted 23 July 2010 - 05:17 AM

The story will probably all take place in the US and they will incorporate stories from other countries like the kid from Japan and the rich sancuary and the Russian priest and have them set here. It'll go from Patient Zero to Yonkers. They'll probably relay a couple of stories as part of newscasts like the submarine and space station. It'll never be as good as the book, but I'll be there...maybe opening night since my wife loves Brad Pitt.

#14 IvanKaramazov

IvanKaramazov

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,261 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 23 July 2010 - 05:19 AM

If Brad Pitt is involved, this will probably be pretty good. I'll see it. Edit: I agree with jamny that a feature film treatment is likely to focus on some sort of overall US story (outbreak, Phalanx, Yonkers, the US implementation of the Redeker plan, and maybe the recovery). I doubt the Chinese sub, the Japanese kid, the downed American pilot, and stuff like that make into the film as anything other than a tangential reference. That's fine though. I'm fairly open to however they choose to do this.

Edited by IvanKaramazov, 23 July 2010 - 05:24 AM.

 

 


#15 Lehigh98

Lehigh98

    Footballguy

  • Street Team
  • Pip
  • 10,361 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Macungie, PA
  • Interests:Things that are interesting

Posted 23 July 2010 - 05:20 AM

No way this movie will be as good as I want it to be.

Are they ever?
Ad Free Since '93

#16 goonsquad

goonsquad

    Think different.

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9,573 posts
  • Joined 04-October 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:1 Infinite Loop

Posted 23 July 2010 - 07:09 AM

The story will probably all take place in the US and they will incorporate stories from other countries like the kid from Japan and the rich sancuary and the Russian priest and have them set here. It'll go from Patient Zero to Yonkers. They'll probably relay a couple of stories as part of newscasts like the submarine and space station. It'll never be as good as the book, but I'll be there...maybe opening night since my wife loves Brad Pitt.

I agree the main focus will be the U.S. government, the political cover-up, the fake vaccine and the military response. I do think they need to show worldwide events to give the proper scope of the outbreak. This is World War Z, after all. To me, the most interesting aspects of the story are the big themes. Government ineptitude, corporate greed and military overconfidence. The commentary on social classes with the celebrity compound is a must. Of course the personal stories give it emotional impact, but the big issues are what will separate it from The Walking Dead and most other previous Zombie works.
Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The trouble-makers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules, and they have no respect for the status-quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify, or vilify them. But the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.

1936, 1937, 1943, 1950, 1952, 1954, 1955, 1997, 1998, 2002, 2008


If I am the coach I want the RB backed by the devil.


#17 PatsWillWin

PatsWillWin

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 11,492 posts
  • Joined 15-April 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Boston

Posted 23 July 2010 - 07:10 AM

The highlight of the movie will definitely be Yonkers. That is going to be awesome.

I demand my right to mockery and derision!!!

Fine. So I'm a blowhard.

But don't think for a minute that this is over. It may fizzle, yes. It may not materialize into a serious strain this Fall or Winter. It may not merge with other viruses... But it may.


#18 KarmaPolice

KarmaPolice

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 13,949 posts
  • Joined 30-July 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 July 2010 - 10:56 AM

I know zombies are the big fad now, but this will not work as a movie. I think a lot of people will be disappointed. As somebody else stated - it would've been good as a series, but it looks like that mini series on AMC beat them to the punch.
"Hey hey listen guys...Look, I don't want to mess with no reefer addicts, ok?"

#19 jamny

jamny

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 26,780 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY

Posted 23 July 2010 - 10:59 AM

I know zombies are the big fad now, but this will not work as a movie. I think a lot of people will be disappointed. As somebody else stated - it would've been good as a series, but it looks like that mini series on AMC beat them to the punch.

Is Walking Dead just a mini series?

#20 KarmaPolice

KarmaPolice

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 13,949 posts
  • Joined 30-July 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 July 2010 - 11:01 AM

I know zombies are the big fad now, but this will not work as a movie. I think a lot of people will be disappointed. As somebody else stated - it would've been good as a series, but it looks like that mini series on AMC beat them to the punch.

Is Walking Dead just a mini series?

I could be wrong - but I thought it was 4 or 5 nights only, I don't think it's a new show. ETA: on imdb, it looks like 6 episodes are scheduled, but they are list as Season 1/episode 1, etc... looks like I am wrong. Maybe what I read is that they have shot 4 episodes or something...

Edited by KarmaPolice, 23 July 2010 - 11:04 AM.

"Hey hey listen guys...Look, I don't want to mess with no reefer addicts, ok?"

#21 goonsquad

goonsquad

    Think different.

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9,573 posts
  • Joined 04-October 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:1 Infinite Loop

Posted 23 July 2010 - 11:04 AM

I know zombies are the big fad now, but this will not work as a movie. I think a lot of people will be disappointed. As somebody else stated - it would've been good as a series, but it looks like that mini series on AMC beat them to the punch.

Is Walking Dead just a mini series?

I could be wrong - but I thought it was 4 or 5 nights only, I don't think it's a new show. ETA: on imdb, it looks like 6 episodes are scheduled, but they are list as Season 1/episode 1, etc... looks like I am wrong. Maybe what I read is that they have shot 4 episodes or something...

The Walking Dead is a full series. ETA: Sorry, was typing while you edited and didn't see it. But yes, the first "Season" is slated for six episodes. Guessing they are pretty expensive to make so AMC is hedging to see if it catches on.

Edited by goonsquad, 23 July 2010 - 11:06 AM.

Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The trouble-makers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules, and they have no respect for the status-quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify, or vilify them. But the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.

1936, 1937, 1943, 1950, 1952, 1954, 1955, 1997, 1998, 2002, 2008


If I am the coach I want the RB backed by the devil.


#22 jamny

jamny

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 26,780 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY

Posted 23 July 2010 - 11:06 AM

I know zombies are the big fad now, but this will not work as a movie. I think a lot of people will be disappointed. As somebody else stated - it would've been good as a series, but it looks like that mini series on AMC beat them to the punch.

Is Walking Dead just a mini series?

I could be wrong - but I thought it was 4 or 5 nights only, I don't think it's a new show. ETA: on imdb, it looks like 6 episodes are scheduled, but they are list as Season 1/episode 1, etc... looks like I am wrong. Maybe what I read is that they have shot 4 episodes or something...

The Walking Dead is a full series.

:headbang: Can't wait!

#23 John 14:6

John 14:6

    Jesus is Lord!

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7,370 posts
  • Joined 21-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maple Grove, MN
  • Interests:Jesus & the Bible
    Transformers
    comics
    sports (NFL, NBA)

Posted 23 July 2010 - 12:02 PM

This is going to disappoint. The book is very good but there is way too much going on for a movie. I think the best way to do it would be to drop the "oral history" aspect of the book and inter cut the stories of about 6-7 characters. It will be a disaster if they try to stay true to the book so I hope that don't even try. It would be like taking the first 15 minutes of "District 9" and stretching it out over an entire movie.

Those first 15 minutes of D9 seemed like 2 hours :wub:

With all the zombie and vampire movies and shows coming out nowadays, I'm surprised we haven't gotten a vampire vs. zombie movie yet...

Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me."
Corner Fringe


I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ. The materialism of affluent Christian countries appears to contradict the claims of Jesus Christ that says it's not possible to worship both Mammon and God at the same time.
— Mahatma Gandhi


#24 badmojo1006

badmojo1006

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,610 posts
  • Joined 19-November 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Breathing

Posted 25 May 2011 - 06:15 PM

Shooting begans next month. Looks like Brad Pitt is going to be the narrator. Lets keep our fingers crossed that it doesn't suck
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. - Inigo Montoya

#25 Zaxxon

Zaxxon

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,446 posts
  • Joined 21-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Slums of Shaolin

Posted 05 November 2011 - 02:56 PM

Shooting begans next month. Looks like Brad Pitt is going to be the narrator. Lets keep our fingers crossed that it doesn't suck

:thumbup:
Without order, nothing exists. Without chaos, nothing evolves.

#26 Vrana

Vrana

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 918 posts
  • Joined 19-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa

Posted 05 November 2011 - 03:05 PM

I just finished my re-read of this last night. I had forgotten how good it was. I have absolutely no hope for this movie though.
Xbox Live Gamertag: Vroomy

#27 Zaxxon

Zaxxon

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,446 posts
  • Joined 21-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Slums of Shaolin

Posted 05 November 2011 - 03:07 PM

I just finished my re-read of this last night. I had forgotten how good it was. I have absolutely no hope for this movie though.

I just finished my first read of it after seeing it recommended in the Walking Dead thread. It seemed very schizophrenic to me until I got used to the interview styled narration. I ended up liking it a lot.
Without order, nothing exists. Without chaos, nothing evolves.

#28 meatwad1

meatwad1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1,933 posts
  • Joined 08-October 06

Posted 05 November 2011 - 03:13 PM

You guys all know that they are making this PG-13, right? Also, the Pitt character is being changed into a U.N 'hero' who helps to contain the zombies. This is going to be of EPIC suckage!!!!

#29 mad sweeney

mad sweeney

    Footballguy

  • Banned
  • Pip
  • 21,278 posts
  • Joined 15-July 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Angeles

Posted 05 November 2011 - 03:54 PM

I just finished my re-read of this last night. I had forgotten how good it was. I have absolutely no hope for this movie though.

Same here. Very impressed with the breadth and depth of his story as well as the telling of the story through completely unrelated recollections. No way the flick can come close.

#30 Kenny Powers

Kenny Powers

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 14,093 posts
  • Joined 14-August 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia Beach
  • Interests:PAWGs

Posted 05 November 2011 - 04:55 PM

WWZ can't be done in a 2 hour movie. They missed their chance to do it as a series with the upcoming Walking Dead coming out on AMC beating them to the punch.

Never read this, but if the scope is much wider and focuses more on gov't, military, etc, considering how popular zombie stuff is these days (and how much garbage is on network TV), there's probably enough room for 2 zombie TV series if this was done right.
Fundamentals are a crutch for teh talentless

I play real sports....not trying to be the best at exercising

#31 Kenny Powers

Kenny Powers

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 14,093 posts
  • Joined 14-August 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia Beach
  • Interests:PAWGs

Posted 05 November 2011 - 04:58 PM

You guys all know that they are making this PG-13, right?

Certainly should be rated R, but these days it seems the biggest different between PG13 and R is language and nudity/sex. Unless you have SAW-type gore or violence, there isnt much of a difference typically in the level of violence between the 2 in most recent movies that Ive seen. There are certainly reasons to be discouraged about how good this will be it would appear, but the rating would be the least of my worries.
Fundamentals are a crutch for teh talentless

I play real sports....not trying to be the best at exercising

#32 IvanKaramazov

IvanKaramazov

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,261 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 05 November 2011 - 05:02 PM

I think people who are automatically assuming this will suck lack imagination. Yes, the book is pretty good, but its not Crime and Punishment. If they can make Fight Club into a film thats arguably better than the book it was drawn from, then they can definitely do the same for WWZ. Not saying it won't suck. God know The Walking Dead sucks horribly despite the source material supposedly being solid. But the potential is there. Edit: And this could easily be PG-13. The entire LOTR trilogy was PG-13 for crying out loud. If you just want a gore-fest, then frankly you missed the whole point of the book.

Edited by IvanKaramazov, 05 November 2011 - 05:04 PM.

 

 


#33 meatwad1

meatwad1

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1,933 posts
  • Joined 08-October 06

Posted 05 November 2011 - 08:37 PM

I think people who are automatically assuming this will suck lack imagination. Yes, the book is pretty good, but its not Crime and Punishment. If they can make Fight Club into a film thats arguably better than the book it was drawn from, then they can definitely do the same for WWZ. Not saying it won't suck. God know The Walking Dead sucks horribly despite the source material supposedly being solid. But the potential is there. Edit: And this could easily be PG-13. The entire LOTR trilogy was PG-13 for crying out loud. If you just want a gore-fest, then frankly you missed the whole point of the book.

1. Fight Club movie was not better than the book. If you think it was, I feel that you missed the point. 2. WWZ is a hardcore horror book. The situations are terrifying. A comparison to LOTR is idiotic seeing that it is a totally different genre. Hard R is the way to go here and any holding back is not worth it at all.

#34 Kenny Powers

Kenny Powers

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 14,093 posts
  • Joined 14-August 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia Beach
  • Interests:PAWGs

Posted 05 November 2011 - 09:25 PM

I think people who are automatically assuming this will suck lack imagination. Yes, the book is pretty good, but its not Crime and Punishment. If they can make Fight Club into a film thats arguably better than the book it was drawn from, then they can definitely do the same for WWZ. Not saying it won't suck. God know The Walking Dead sucks horribly despite the source material supposedly being solid. But the potential is there. Edit: And this could easily be PG-13. The entire LOTR trilogy was PG-13 for crying out loud. If you just want a gore-fest, then frankly you missed the whole point of the book.

1. Fight Club movie was not better than the book. If you think it was, I feel that you missed the point. 2. WWZ is a hardcore horror book. The situations are terrifying. A comparison to LOTR is idiotic seeing that it is a totally different genre. Hard R is the way to go here and any holding back is not worth it at all.

Some suspense/thrillers that are related to horror have terrifying situations, no? Most of the "hardcore horror" films Ive seen I dont find as scary as other films that put the characters as well as the viewer in a truly scary situation. The Ring was PG13 and I thought it was plenty terrifying.
Fundamentals are a crutch for teh talentless

I play real sports....not trying to be the best at exercising

#35 Usual21

Usual21

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,558 posts
  • Joined 02-August 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ
  • Interests:Giants, Yankees, Knicks. Playing basketball, reading, cooking.

Posted 20 March 2012 - 09:48 AM

Just finished listening to it on audiobook. Awesome book. Then I found out that it was the abridged version. :wall:

#36 badmojo1006

badmojo1006

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,610 posts
  • Joined 19-November 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Breathing

Posted 20 March 2012 - 10:02 AM

Just finished listening to it on audiobook. Awesome book. Then I found out that it was the abridged version. :wall:

Yeah, there are some parts missing, but the cast is incredible. Alan Alda, Henry Rollins and even Mark Hamill do a great job
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. - Inigo Montoya

#37 Usual21

Usual21

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,558 posts
  • Joined 02-August 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central NJ
  • Interests:Giants, Yankees, Knicks. Playing basketball, reading, cooking.

Posted 20 March 2012 - 10:07 AM

Just finished listening to it on audiobook. Awesome book. Then I found out that it was the abridged version. :wall:

Yeah, there are some parts missing, but the cast is incredible. Alan Alda, Henry Rollins and even Mark Hamill do a great job

Alda was fantastic. Battle of Yonkers was nuts. Are there any parts that you know of in the book that are not in the audiobook that I should go back and read? Or should I just move onto the Zombie Survival Guide?

#38 badmojo1006

badmojo1006

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,610 posts
  • Joined 19-November 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Breathing

Posted 20 March 2012 - 10:11 AM

Just finished listening to it on audiobook. Awesome book. Then I found out that it was the abridged version. :wall:

Yeah, there are some parts missing, but the cast is incredible. Alan Alda, Henry Rollins and even Mark Hamill do a great job

Alda was fantastic. Battle of Yonkers was nuts. Are there any parts that you know of in the book that are not in the audiobook that I should go back and read? Or should I just move onto the Zombie Survival Guide?

Zombie guide is very boring except for the appendix in the back that talks about Zombie outbreaks since the beginning of time. Yes, two creepy chapters (The Canadian drug agents near the beginning and the Battle under Paris). And the Chinese Submarine adventures is probably the longest section but a great read
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. - Inigo Montoya

#39 Wrigley

Wrigley

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 13,760 posts
  • Joined 01-October 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Burbs
  • Interests:Little of this, little of that

Posted 20 March 2012 - 10:12 AM

Trailer

It's human nature to stick with traditional beliefs, even after they outlast any conceivable utility.- Jim Pinkerton
Freedom is the right to tell people what they don't want to hear- George Orwell

XBL: MASTERH8

My god, Wrigley sucks.

how I live my life


#40 badmojo1006

badmojo1006

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,610 posts
  • Joined 19-November 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Breathing

Posted 20 March 2012 - 10:16 AM

Trailer

Lets see: Clips from Dawn of the Dead, 28 Months Later, SeVen, Resident Evil, I am legend, The Road, Deep Impact...

Not for WWZ.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. - Inigo Montoya

#41 Michael Brown

Michael Brown

    Footballguy

  • Moderator
  • Pip
  • 6,455 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 March 2012 - 10:19 AM


Trailer

Lets see: Clips from Dawn of the Dead, 28 Months Later, SeVen, Resident Evil, I am legend, The Road, Deep Impact...

Not for WWZ.

It says underneath that it is a fan-made trailer
Why subscribe to Footballguys?

If you ain't first, you're last.

#42 purplehaze67

purplehaze67

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1,891 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, MI

Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:43 AM

http://twitchfilm.co...n-the-works.php


WORLD WAR Z IN A WORLD OF TROUBLE: MAJOR RESHOOTS AND A DAMON LINDELOF REWRITE IN THE WORKS

Marc Forster's World War Z is in a world of trouble. After a lengthy struggle to get the project off the ground at Paramount, Forster shot the film with a cast anchored by Brad Pitt in 2011. Principal photography has been done for ages and the film should be well into the post production process at this point, prepping for its planned December release.

The first sign of trouble came when that release was pushed back six months to June of 2013. That's a big push, but not unheard of. But then word start to circulate through the British tabloids that Pitt and the principal cast were being called back for extensive reshoots. Again, reshoots are not that uncommon but according to reports the cast was being brought back for a whopping seven weeks of reshoots - a time commitment longer than most films' entire principal photography schedule. If these reports are accurate - again, they came through the UK tabloids, which is why we didn't repeat them - then this is a sign not of a few scenes that need tweaking but of major, major changes.

And now that shoe has well and truly dropped: The Hollywood Reporter brings word that Prometheus scribe Damon Lindelof has been brought on to rewrite the script with particular attention apparently being paid to the final act.

Even if this works out this is disastrous for what was already an expensive, high risk movie. The cost overruns involved in doing this sort of work are staggering and the studio doing so a sure sign that they are in damage control mode. This is about stopping the bleeding.


EVERYTHING I NEED TO KNOW I LEARNED FROM SCRATCH

Upsetting words of wisdom:

Help the weak if you are strong.
He who speaketh lies shall perish.
Too much illusion brings on confusion.
Fascination with evil throws good things into the shade.
The western world is a fraud.
Free your mind, and the devil dead.
Empty handed you came, empty handed you go.
Open your eyes and try to be wise.
Fire is coming to the heads of government.
Live a life that you love, and love the life that you live.
The seed you sow, that's what will grow.
Who wants the most will get the least.
The knife that sticks the sheep also sticks the goat.
Let's wipe out all the bad.
The truth ain't got no friends.
Every man have his own opinion.
Bed jammin' is a must.
Take your time, dig it man.

#43 Kenny Powers

Kenny Powers

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 14,093 posts
  • Joined 14-August 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia Beach
  • Interests:PAWGs

Posted 08 June 2012 - 11:29 AM

I can keeping waiting as long as they make a very good to great movie
Fundamentals are a crutch for teh talentless

I play real sports....not trying to be the best at exercising

#44 Rick James

Rick James

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,047 posts
  • Joined 22-June 04

Posted 08 June 2012 - 12:52 PM

Just finished listening to it on audiobook. Awesome book. Then I found out that it was the abridged version. :wall:

Yeah, there are some parts missing, but the cast is incredible. Alan Alda, Henry Rollins and even Mark Hamill do a great job

I haven't read the novel, but I thought the audio book was kinda boring...which is weird because this should be right up my alley. I don't know, it didn't seem that interesting to me. Nothing happened.

#45 pantherclub

pantherclub

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,165 posts
  • Joined 01-June 04

Posted 08 June 2012 - 01:32 PM

http://twitchfilm.co...n-the-works.php



WORLD WAR Z IN A WORLD OF TROUBLE: MAJOR RESHOOTS AND A DAMON LINDELOF REWRITE IN THE WORKS

Marc Forster's World War Z is in a world of trouble. After a lengthy struggle to get the project off the ground at Paramount, Forster shot the film with a cast anchored by Brad Pitt in 2011. Principal photography has been done for ages and the film should be well into the post production process at this point, prepping for its planned December release.

The first sign of trouble came when that release was pushed back six months to June of 2013. That's a big push, but not unheard of. But then word start to circulate through the British tabloids that Pitt and the principal cast were being called back for extensive reshoots. Again, reshoots are not that uncommon but according to reports the cast was being brought back for a whopping seven weeks of reshoots - a time commitment longer than most films' entire principal photography schedule. If these reports are accurate - again, they came through the UK tabloids, which is why we didn't repeat them - then this is a sign not of a few scenes that need tweaking but of major, major changes.

And now that shoe has well and truly dropped: The Hollywood Reporter brings word that Prometheus scribe Damon Lindelof has been brought on to rewrite the script with particular attention apparently being paid to the final act.

Even if this works out this is disastrous for what was already an expensive, high risk movie. The cost overruns involved in doing this sort of work are staggering and the studio doing so a sure sign that they are in damage control mode. This is about stopping the bleeding.


The window for this to be epic closed a long time ago. This should have been an HBO series or 3 movies like LOTR. No way on Gods Green Earth could a 2 hour movie do this justice.

#46 badmojo1006

badmojo1006

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,610 posts
  • Joined 19-November 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Breathing

Posted 06 November 2012 - 02:53 PM

Here is a brief clip with a longer trailer coming out on Thursday. Those are fast effen zombies

I really hope it doesn't suck. It probably will be OK, but the only thing it will have in common with the book will be the title :(
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. - Inigo Montoya

#47 stbugs

stbugs

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9,344 posts
  • Joined 08-December 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 06 November 2012 - 03:00 PM

Here is a brief clip with a longer trailer coming out on Thursday. Those are fast effen zombies

I really hope it doesn't suck. It probably will be OK, but the only thing it will have in common with the book will be the title :(

Yeah, what the hell is that? Looked like a swarm of nanobots from GI Joe that eats everything in its path.

I can already say that if that is the premise, it is going to suck. Might as well be a Michael Bay zombie movie.

ETA: I am OK with "zombies" like 28 days later where they become hyper aggresive attackers, but I can't stand when you see stuff like that remake of Dawn of the Dead where they become super human (i.e. like the morbidly obese woman in the mall that becomes an NFL linebacker. Watching the zombie horde become organized enough to climb a building is on the silly side.

Edited by stbugs, 06 November 2012 - 03:03 PM.


#48 badmojo1006

badmojo1006

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,610 posts
  • Joined 19-November 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Breathing

Posted 06 November 2012 - 03:00 PM


Here is a brief clip with a longer trailer coming out on Thursday. Those are fast effen zombies

I really hope it doesn't suck. It probably will be OK, but the only thing it will have in common with the book will be the title :(

Yeah, what the hell is that? Looked like a swarm of nanobots from GI Joe that eats everything in its path.

I can already say that if that is the premise, it is going to suck. Might as well be a Michael Bay zombie movie.

Excellent description
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. - Inigo Montoya

#49 stbugs

stbugs

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9,344 posts
  • Joined 08-December 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 06 November 2012 - 03:05 PM



Here is a brief clip with a longer trailer coming out on Thursday. Those are fast effen zombies

I really hope it doesn't suck. It probably will be OK, but the only thing it will have in common with the book will be the title :(

Yeah, what the hell is that? Looked like a swarm of nanobots from GI Joe that eats everything in its path.

I can already say that if that is the premise, it is going to suck. Might as well be a Michael Bay zombie movie.

Excellent description

Unfortunately accurate.

#50 badmojo1006

badmojo1006

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10,610 posts
  • Joined 19-November 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Breathing

Posted 08 November 2012 - 04:38 PM

Here is the full trailer....Warning for book fans (which I am), it looks nothing like the book. But, the trailer by itself, is not bad. I will go see it
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. - Inigo Montoya




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users