I am commish a Yahoo league and we are finally entering the modern era by transitioning to PPR this year.
Scoring has become too heavily skewed towards QBs (6-pt TD, 1pt/20yds, 0.5 per completion, -0.5 per incompleteion, penalties for INTs and sacks) and we are looking to dampen this effect by upgrading other skill position scoring.
Original proposal was for 1.0 per reception but people are concerned this rewards potentially ineffectual plays (e.g 3 late-game garbage dumpoffs could equate almost to a TD) and their is a counteproposal for 0.5.
It is also 7-man IDP if that impacts the decision at all.
Any feedback from those who faced a similar 0.5 vs. 1.0 PPR decision and what types of arguments ultimately carried the day? I've noticed both types scoring formats and was also curious if either is becoming the "standard."
Thanks.
Scoring has become too heavily skewed towards QBs (6-pt TD, 1pt/20yds, 0.5 per completion, -0.5 per incompleteion, penalties for INTs and sacks) and we are looking to dampen this effect by upgrading other skill position scoring.
Original proposal was for 1.0 per reception but people are concerned this rewards potentially ineffectual plays (e.g 3 late-game garbage dumpoffs could equate almost to a TD) and their is a counteproposal for 0.5.
It is also 7-man IDP if that impacts the decision at all.
Any feedback from those who faced a similar 0.5 vs. 1.0 PPR decision and what types of arguments ultimately carried the day? I've noticed both types scoring formats and was also curious if either is becoming the "standard."
Thanks.