Neither yet, and I wonder if I'll be able to get any of them after today's games.I like Best as the higher upside player -- he's like Chris Johnson Jr -- but I hate his schedule. Foster is a great fit for the system he's in and I like his situation much better.PPR. Arian Foster or Jahvid Best, both looked insane today, especially Foster. Pick one and why.
I have both on my dynasty teamPPR. Arian Foster or Jahvid Best, both looked insane today, especially Foster. Pick one and why.
In PPR I would not be surprised to see either one or both of these guys outperform Turner this year.I've got both behind Turner and Mendenhall. Have enough confidence in these two guys that I plan to ship Mendenhall out for an elite WR
Agree Foster has the better situation but there is a talent gap here.....Best is absolutely electric. I view them virtually even....Foster is a little safer and Best has more upside.Guys like Adrian Peterson and Ray Rice should tell us, if all else fails pick the rookie with the best offensive line. I would have to go with Foster on this one.Foster > Best > Spiller
I think the chances of Best being there at the 3/4 turn are remote now.bulger2holt said:I am taking both at the 3/4 turn from the 11th spot and not embarrassed to admit ( 3-11 and 4-2 ). Heck, they might not even be there by next weekend when we draft at this rate. Spiller at 5-11 too. That's how i'm rolling, swinging for the fences.
I'd take both over all of those myself. I expect equivalent or better performance for half the price.where are you guys ranking Foster and Best?...Ahead of guys like Grant, Benson, Moreno.....Mendy?
that's the problem, when to take. It just takes 2 other owners in a 12 teamer to feel the same way and both go in the 2nd round.I'd take both over all of those myself. I expect equivalent or better performance for half the price.where are you guys ranking Foster and Best?...Ahead of guys like Grant, Benson, Moreno.....Mendy?
Wow, the only person I'd take those guys over would be Moreno. Grant's on one of the best offenses in football.that's the problem, when to take. It just takes 2 other owners in a 12 teamer to feel the same way and both go in the 2nd round.I'd take both over all of those myself. I expect equivalent or better performance for half the price.where are you guys ranking Foster and Best?...Ahead of guys like Grant, Benson, Moreno.....Mendy?
if you are dead set on those players then perhaps you wont get them at value.. if people take them in the second that should then drop the other grp and increase their value.i do auctions exclusively now so i will set a value to get these guys at (mid $20's), run em all up to that point, see what happens.that's the problem, when to take. It just takes 2 other owners in a 12 teamer to feel the same way and both go in the 2nd round.I'd take both over all of those myself. I expect equivalent or better performance for half the price.where are you guys ranking Foster and Best?...Ahead of guys like Grant, Benson, Moreno.....Mendy?
What have you seen them going for in auctions? I have never done one and have my first one tonight and am curious if mid 20's or teens is where these guys will go.if you are dead set on those players then perhaps you wont get them at value.. if people take them in the second that should then drop the other grp and increase their value.i do auctions exclusively now so i will set a value to get these guys at (mid $20's), run em all up to that point, see what happens.that's the problem, when to take. It just takes 2 other owners in a 12 teamer to feel the same way and both go in the 2nd round.I'd take both over all of those myself. I expect equivalent or better performance for half the price.where are you guys ranking Foster and Best?...Ahead of guys like Grant, Benson, Moreno.....Mendy?
$200 ESPN mock fridayRB/WR Arian Foster 11RB/WR Jahvid Best 14This is cheaper than I expect to be paying mid-week. I will go nearly double personally.What have you seen them going for in auctions? I have never done one and have my first one tonight and am curious if mid 20's or teens is where these guys will go.if you are dead set on those players then perhaps you wont get them at value.. if people take them in the second that should then drop the other grp and increase their value.i do auctions exclusively now so i will set a value to get these guys at (mid $20's), run em all up to that point, see what happens.that's the problem, when to take. It just takes 2 other owners in a 12 teamer to feel the same way and both go in the 2nd round.I'd take both over all of those myself. I expect equivalent or better performance for half the price.where are you guys ranking Foster and Best?...Ahead of guys like Grant, Benson, Moreno.....Mendy?
Local league $200 auction last Friday - I got Best at $15, Foster for $7What have you seen them going for in auctions? I have never done one and have my first one tonight and am curious if mid 20's or teens is where these guys will go.if you are dead set on those players then perhaps you wont get them at value.. if people take them in the second that should then drop the other grp and increase their value.i do auctions exclusively now so i will set a value to get these guys at (mid $20's), run em all up to that point, see what happens.that's the problem, when to take. It just takes 2 other owners in a 12 teamer to feel the same way and both go in the 2nd round.I'd take both over all of those myself. I expect equivalent or better performance for half the price.where are you guys ranking Foster and Best?...Ahead of guys like Grant, Benson, Moreno.....Mendy?
That worked out sweet for you. Is it a 6 point TD pass league. I doubt many leagues will get AJ at #12 & also getting Jennings in the late 3rd/early 4th is a surprise too. As for Best & Foster. both have really looked good. I know there's no way that Foster will last until the end of the 5th or early 6th in either of my leagues coming up. You should have a really good looking team if these guys work out. Nice job.Who is your QB?I got 'em both. I picked 12 in a 12 team re-draft 0.5 PPR league at work. Very competitive for a work league, 11 of 12 know their business.I went Andre & Calvin at the 1.12/2.01. Then: Best/Jennings Foster/Bradshaw at the next two turns. I'm concerned about having two Texans and two Lions but I think they will each be stronger than expected a few months ago.This was a week ago and prior to Best and Foster looking like beasts this weekend. I never say this but this year drafting early worked out for me!
Kolb. I'm a huge Eagles fan, but never let that enter my picks. I'm thinking he could be a mild surprise and finish top 10-12. I'm not sold on him but preferred to wait on a QB. Jennings should never have been on the board at the 36/37 turn. That is outrageous. If he was drafted when he should have been, I would have went QB at the 3/4 turn. Manning, Brees, Rodgers all went between 1.07 and 1.11 so that paved the way for A.Johnson to fall to 1.12...That worked out sweet for you. Is it a 6 point TD pass league. I doubt many leagues will get AJ at #12 & also getting Jennings in the late 3rd/early 4th is a surprise too. As for Best & Foster. both have really looked good. I know there's no way that Foster will last until the end of the 5th or early 6th in either of my leagues coming up. You should have a really good looking team if these guys work out. Nice job.Who is your QB?I got 'em both. I picked 12 in a 12 team re-draft 0.5 PPR league at work. Very competitive for a work league, 11 of 12 know their business.I went Andre & Calvin at the 1.12/2.01. Then: Best/Jennings Foster/Bradshaw at the next two turns. I'm concerned about having two Texans and two Lions but I think they will each be stronger than expected a few months ago.This was a week ago and prior to Best and Foster looking like beasts this weekend. I never say this but this year drafting early worked out for me!
That stat is a bit distorted because the Lions were down so much that defenses were geared to take away the pass. The Lions were not a good rushing team last year. However, I think Best is in a good situation and is going to be great. I expect the Lions to put up a lot of points this year. However, I don't think Best gets the GL carries, where Foster will. That IMO is the big difference.Not sure how people can say Foster has the better situation.the Detroit Lions were 2nd in the NFL in runs of 4+ yds last year. That offensive line can run-block, and Best will have lots of opportunities to break big runs. Not to mention that he really has nobody lurking to take carries away either.
This stat doesnt really mean anything to me. A lot of that could have been due to the fact that they were in a lot of 2nd or 3rd and long situations where they picked up more than 4 yards on draw plays and delays.I think Foster is in the better situation for the reasons I stated before. Better offense, better overall team, which should lead to more scoring opportunities. Also, I think that K Smith could be a short yardage/goaline vulture.Not sure how people can say Foster has the better situation.
the Detroit Lions were 2nd in the NFL in runs of 4+ yds last year. That offensive line can run-block, and Best will have lots of opportunities to break big runs. Not to mention that he really has nobody lurking to take carries away either.
I think FB Jerome Felton will be the GL guy. I also don't think Kevin Smith makes the team.This stat doesnt really mean anything to me. A lot of that could have been due to the fact that they were in a lot of 2nd or 3rd and long situations where they picked up more than 4 yards on draw plays and delays.I think Foster is in the better situation for the reasons I stated before. Better offense, better overall team, which should lead to more scoring opportunities. Also, I think that K Smith could be a short yardage/goaline vulture.Not sure how people can say Foster has the better situation.
the Detroit Lions were 2nd in the NFL in runs of 4+ yds last year. That offensive line can run-block, and Best will have lots of opportunities to break big runs. Not to mention that he really has nobody lurking to take carries away either.
But overall, I think it's very close and see no problems with taking Best over Foster. Foster is still slightly higher on my board though.
It means that there will be a lot of opportunities for Best to make big gains. Whether or not those are on 2nd or 3rd and long are irrelevant. Fantasy points aren't put into any type of context. If he gets 100+ yds per week, and the Lions go 5-11, it won't make a difference.This stat doesnt really mean anything to me. A lot of that could have been due to the fact that they were in a lot of 2nd or 3rd and long situations where they picked up more than 4 yards on draw plays and delays.I think Foster is in the better situation for the reasons I stated before. Better offense, better overall team, which should lead to more scoring opportunities. Also, I think that K Smith could be a short yardage/goaline vulture.Not sure how people can say Foster has the better situation.
the Detroit Lions were 2nd in the NFL in runs of 4+ yds last year. That offensive line can run-block, and Best will have lots of opportunities to break big runs. Not to mention that he really has nobody lurking to take carries away either.
But overall, I think it's very close and see no problems with taking Best over Foster. Foster is still slightly higher on my board though.
Lions were also 24th in yards per game, 25th in ypc, 22nd in rushing TDs, 31st in rushes over 20 yards (just 5) and only had 1 run over 40 yards. I don't think using Detroit's 2009 rushing stats help you make any kind of case for Best.It means that there will be a lot of opportunities for Best to make big gains. Whether or not those are on 2nd or 3rd and long are irrelevant. Fantasy points aren't put into any type of context. If he gets 100+ yds per week, and the Lions go 5-11, it won't make a difference.This stat doesnt really mean anything to me. A lot of that could have been due to the fact that they were in a lot of 2nd or 3rd and long situations where they picked up more than 4 yards on draw plays and delays.I think Foster is in the better situation for the reasons I stated before. Better offense, better overall team, which should lead to more scoring opportunities. Also, I think that K Smith could be a short yardage/goaline vulture.Not sure how people can say Foster has the better situation.
the Detroit Lions were 2nd in the NFL in runs of 4+ yds last year. That offensive line can run-block, and Best will have lots of opportunities to break big runs. Not to mention that he really has nobody lurking to take carries away either.
But overall, I think it's very close and see no problems with taking Best over Foster. Foster is still slightly higher on my board though.
I see your point but I still don't put anything into that stat. Best will have long runs this year because he he has big play ability, not because of a circumstantial stat from the year before. I simply think Foster will have the opportunity to be on the field more and have more touches in the red zone because again, Houston is a better team and offense. Plus he is more likely to get GL carries (IMO).It means that there will be a lot of opportunities for Best to make big gains. Whether or not those are on 2nd or 3rd and long are irrelevant. Fantasy points aren't put into any type of context. If he gets 100+ yds per week, and the Lions go 5-11, it won't make a difference.This stat doesnt really mean anything to me. A lot of that could have been due to the fact that they were in a lot of 2nd or 3rd and long situations where they picked up more than 4 yards on draw plays and delays.I think Foster is in the better situation for the reasons I stated before. Better offense, better overall team, which should lead to more scoring opportunities. Also, I think that K Smith could be a short yardage/goaline vulture.Not sure how people can say Foster has the better situation.
the Detroit Lions were 2nd in the NFL in runs of 4+ yds last year. That offensive line can run-block, and Best will have lots of opportunities to break big runs. Not to mention that he really has nobody lurking to take carries away either.
But overall, I think it's very close and see no problems with taking Best over Foster. Foster is still slightly higher on my board though.
OK, so they were 2nd in the NFL in carries of 4+ yds, yet they were 25th in ypc. What does that tell youLions were also 24th in yards per game, 25th in ypc, 22nd in rushing TDs, 31st in rushes over 20 yards (just 5) and only had 1 run over 40 yards. I don't think using Detroit's 2009 rushing stats help you make any kind of case for Best.It means that there will be a lot of opportunities for Best to make big gains. Whether or not those are on 2nd or 3rd and long are irrelevant. Fantasy points aren't put into any type of context. If he gets 100+ yds per week, and the Lions go 5-11, it won't make a difference.This stat doesnt really mean anything to me. A lot of that could have been due to the fact that they were in a lot of 2nd or 3rd and long situations where they picked up more than 4 yards on draw plays and delays.I think Foster is in the better situation for the reasons I stated before. Better offense, better overall team, which should lead to more scoring opportunities. Also, I think that K Smith could be a short yardage/goaline vulture.Not sure how people can say Foster has the better situation.
the Detroit Lions were 2nd in the NFL in runs of 4+ yds last year. That offensive line can run-block, and Best will have lots of opportunities to break big runs. Not to mention that he really has nobody lurking to take carries away either.
But overall, I think it's very close and see no problems with taking Best over Foster. Foster is still slightly higher on my board though.
It tells me they were a bad rushing team who led the league in some random stat because they ran a lot of draws on 2nd/3rd and long. Which is precisely what I saw with my own eyes as a Detroit homer. Regardless, I am very bullish on Best this year, just not for the same reasons as you.OK, so they were 2nd in the NFL in carries of 4+ yds, yet they were 25th in ypc. What does that tell youLions were also 24th in yards per game, 25th in ypc, 22nd in rushing TDs, 31st in rushes over 20 yards (just 5) and only had 1 run over 40 yards. I don't think using Detroit's 2009 rushing stats help you make any kind of case for Best.It means that there will be a lot of opportunities for Best to make big gains. Whether or not those are on 2nd or 3rd and long are irrelevant. Fantasy points aren't put into any type of context. If he gets 100+ yds per week, and the Lions go 5-11, it won't make a difference.This stat doesnt really mean anything to me. A lot of that could have been due to the fact that they were in a lot of 2nd or 3rd and long situations where they picked up more than 4 yards on draw plays and delays.I think Foster is in the better situation for the reasons I stated before. Better offense, better overall team, which should lead to more scoring opportunities. Also, I think that K Smith could be a short yardage/goaline vulture.Not sure how people can say Foster has the better situation.
the Detroit Lions were 2nd in the NFL in runs of 4+ yds last year. That offensive line can run-block, and Best will have lots of opportunities to break big runs. Not to mention that he really has nobody lurking to take carries away either.
But overall, I think it's very close and see no problems with taking Best over Foster. Foster is still slightly higher on my board though.![]()
Or they could have had an offensive line that could consistently open holes, but RBs that couldn't break anything big?It tells me they were a bad rushing team who led the league in some random stat because they ran a lot of draws on 2nd/3rd and long. Which is precisely what I saw with my own eyes as a Detroit homer. Regardless, I am very bullish on Best this year, just not for the same reasons as you.OK, so they were 2nd in the NFL in carries of 4+ yds, yet they were 25th in ypc. What does that tell youLions were also 24th in yards per game, 25th in ypc, 22nd in rushing TDs, 31st in rushes over 20 yards (just 5) and only had 1 run over 40 yards. I don't think using Detroit's 2009 rushing stats help you make any kind of case for Best.It means that there will be a lot of opportunities for Best to make big gains. Whether or not those are on 2nd or 3rd and long are irrelevant. Fantasy points aren't put into any type of context. If he gets 100+ yds per week, and the Lions go 5-11, it won't make a difference.This stat doesnt really mean anything to me. A lot of that could have been due to the fact that they were in a lot of 2nd or 3rd and long situations where they picked up more than 4 yards on draw plays and delays.I think Foster is in the better situation for the reasons I stated before. Better offense, better overall team, which should lead to more scoring opportunities. Also, I think that K Smith could be a short yardage/goaline vulture.But overall, I think it's very close and see no problems with taking Best over Foster. Foster is still slightly higher on my board though.![]()
Best lasted all the way until my 4.04 pick (#40 overall). So I ended up with both guys (Foster at 2.04, 16th).Both of them are losing value fast. Foster went #19 overall last night and Best was #29 (to the same team). The hype trains are out of control!
1st and 10 could be a great down to run on for a RB if your team is trailing like Detroit usually was. Teams will let you have those 4 yd. clips all day long when they're ahead late in the game.Regardless, that stat doesn't prove anything. Unless you get bonus points for rushes over 4 yards (but not over 20 because Detroit only had 5 of those), it really shouldn't factor in much at all.To further illustrate...The Lions had 197 runs last season of 4+ yds. Here is the breakdown by down:1 1072 663 214 2I'm not sure how many of those were draws, but there a lot of those runs were on first down.
I think the Lions' O-line is decent, as well. One thing I would point out about these stats is that it's a lot easier to run on 1sr/2nd down when your team is behind 2+ scores. The defense will be playing back more often to guard against the pass.Are you able to pull the 2009 Lions' YPC per quarter or per half? If their 1st qtr/1st half rushing stats are solid, that makes the stats you posted look a lot stronger.To further illustrate...The Lions had 197 runs last season of 4+ yds. Here is the breakdown by down:1 1072 663 214 2I'm not sure how many of those were draws, but there a lot of those runs were on first down.