What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

L. Blount (1 Viewer)

timschochet

Footballguy
NOW that the game is over, we can talk about this. TB was awful on offense today, though most of that is because the Steelers are playing lights out. But when Blount was in, he looked really good. Much better than Caddy. Forget about Kareem Huggins, this is the guy. I'm hoping nobody else in my league noticed and I'm grabbing him as soon as I can. I predict that within 2-3 weeks he will be the starter, and I also think this Tampa team is not nearly as bad as they played today. Blount could be the steal that wins you your league this year. Get him!

 
Blount had 6 carries for 27 yards and a TD. I know this doesn't sound like much, but Caddy only had 6 carries for 13 yards. And back when the game was close, Blount came in and had consecutive impressive carries.

 
Blount had 6 carries for 27 yards and a TD. I know this doesn't sound like much, but Caddy only had 6 carries for 13 yards. And back when the game was close, Blount came in and had consecutive impressive carries.
Fine but you're making take it to the bank predictions based on very two impressive carries early in the game and six touches overall.
 
Blount had 6 carries for 27 yards and a TD. I know this doesn't sound like much, but Caddy only had 6 carries for 13 yards. And back when the game was close, Blount came in and had consecutive impressive carries.
Fine but you're making take it to the bank predictions based on very two impressive carries early in the game and six touches overall.
I think I missed the take it to the bank part.But Blount definitely looked better than any other RB out there for the Bucs today, and it wasn't close. Pittsburgh was all over him just like they were over everyone else who touched the ball...they just couldn't bring Blount down.I have my doubts he'll get the chance to prove it, so I wouldn't rush out and nab him. But I really liked what I saw out of the guy today against probably the league's best D, and like his future prospects.
 
Blount had 6 carries for 27 yards and a TD. I know this doesn't sound like much, but Caddy only had 6 carries for 13 yards. And back when the game was close, Blount came in and had consecutive impressive carries.
Fine but you're making take it to the bank predictions based on very two impressive carries early in the game and six touches overall.
I never said take it to the bank. I told you what I thought might happen, and I said grab him while you can. Remember how many pages that Kareem Huggins thread was? That was based on a couple of good performances in the preseason. Blount's performance today, as limited as it was, should be more predictive than all of the preseason nonsense. Here's what I think I know:1. Blount is clearly the #2 RB on this team- you can forget about Huggins.2. Blount looked impressive today against an elite defense in the first quarter- he looked better than Williams.3. Williams is as likely to go down to injury as any starting RB in the NFL. And he has not been impressive.4. Because of Blount's limited numbers, I doubt it would be too difficult to pick him up in your league, unless you're playing with a bunch of sharks.So what does this add up to? This could be the sort of major steal that FF players dream about: the RB added from the WW that nobody's talking about that becomes a starter on your team and wins you a championship. Every year that I have won in the past, it was due to one of these guys. Last year it was Jamaal Charles, and I added him because somebody here started a thread telling me I should.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NOW that the game is over, we can talk about this. TB was awful on offense today, though most of that is because the Steelers are playing lights out. But when Blount was in, he looked really good. Much better than Caddy. Forget about Kareem Huggins, this is the guy. I'm hoping nobody else in my league noticed and I'm grabbing him as soon as I can. I predict that within 2-3 weeks he will be the starter, and I also think this Tampa team is not nearly as bad as they played today. Blount could be the steal that wins you your league this year. Get him!
Jeez people stop being so literal. Do we all agree that Timmy made a prediction? May I refer to the prediction as "enthusiastic"? Never mind. The fact that Tim is making predictions that Blount is going to be the starter in Tampa Bay in 2-3 weeks based on two impressive carries early and six touches overall seems a little premature.

Can we agree on that?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
NOW that the game is over, we can talk about this. TB was awful on offense today, though most of that is because the Steelers are playing lights out. But when Blount was in, he looked really good. Much better than Caddy. Forget about Kareem Huggins, this is the guy. I'm hoping nobody else in my league noticed and I'm grabbing him as soon as I can. I predict that within 2-3 weeks he will be the starter, and I also think this Tampa team is not nearly as bad as they played today. Blount could be the steal that wins you your league this year. Get him!
Jeez people stop being so literal. Do we all agree that Timmy made a prediction? May I refer to the prediction as "enthusiastic"? Never mind. The fact that Tim is making predictions that Blount is going to be the starter in Tampa Bay in 2-3 weeks based on two impressive carries early and six touches overall seems a little premature.

Can we agree on that?
The guy played really tough and looked pretty good with the limited carries he did see, also did a really nice job blocking as well. I'd expect him to see more carries but without an injury he most likely will not overtake Caddy as the starter this season.

 
NOW that the game is over, we can talk about this. TB was awful on offense today, though most of that is because the Steelers are playing lights out. But when Blount was in, he looked really good. Much better than Caddy. Forget about Kareem Huggins, this is the guy. I'm hoping nobody else in my league noticed and I'm grabbing him as soon as I can. I predict that within 2-3 weeks he will be the starter, and I also think this Tampa team is not nearly as bad as they played today. Blount could be the steal that wins you your league this year. Get him!
Jeez people stop being so literal. Do we all agree that Timmy made a prediction? May I refer to the prediction as "enthusiastic"? Never mind. The fact that Tim is making predictions that Blount is going to be the starter in Tampa Bay in 2-3 weeks based on two impressive carries early and six touches overall seems a little premature.

Can we agree on that?
no we can'tand don't put me in the position to defend tim again please

ok i missed that part - yeah Tim don't be silly Caddy isn't loosing his job in 2 weeks

but Blount did look very good

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We seem to have wasted a lot of ink (and perhaps waiver moves) debating Huggins vs Graham last week.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not that it matters, but I drafted Blount late since I knew he had an opportunity to play more since becoming a Buc.

 
We seem to have wasted a lot of ink (and perhaps waiver moves) debating Huggins vs Graham last week.
Huggins was listed as inactive due to injury. Everyone so far has failed to mention that point.
Thanks. Good info there. So the hype train is not derailed just yet. Still, I don't recall anybody here who saw this (Blount) coming.
Titans letting him go was probably due to having to keep 6 WRs (if trying to find something in numbers crunch)It would seem extremely likely that Fisher wanted him for the practice squad. He looked to be filling a Lendale like goalline runner and short yardage role. Fisher and Heimerdinger showed faith in him as he carried it 3 times in a row on the one in one preseason game.I thought they'd regret it when Tampa signed him.FB Ahmard Hall is their only RB with a lower your head and bowl people over like a brute type mentality and he's not much of a runner at all. Today Hall looked hurt, but he's a warrior. He'll play if he can.Anyhow Blount's tough.The punch stuff was overdone. At the NFL level, I don't mind a fiesty tough guy battling for a few extra yards. He punched (or swung) someone during training camp and it was treated as just "eh stuff happens."The prob is there's nothing fancy about him and everyone wants these graceful gazelles as RBs. Blount's no starter IMO. He could fill in but...even if Tampa does start him, next year he'd be replaced just like Graham.
 
1. Blount is clearly the #2 RB on this team- you can forget about Huggins.
Shouldn't we wait to see what happens when Huggins is healthy enough to be active for a game or two before we "forget" him?For all we know Blount got carries today only because Huggins wasn't available.
 
1. Blount is clearly the #2 RB on this team- you can forget about Huggins.
Shouldn't we wait to see what happens when Huggins is healthy enough to be active for a game or two before we "forget" him?For all we know Blount got carries today only because Huggins wasn't available.
Regardless of how or why he got the carries, Blount looked very good today. Huggins getting healthy won't change that fact... And as far as getting tough yardage, or blocking goes, Blount is a far better back then Huggins. Blount is more capable of being the every down back.. Huggins is better suited for COP duty...
 
davearm said:
timschochet said:
1. Blount is clearly the #2 RB on this team- you can forget about Huggins.
Shouldn't we wait to see what happens when Huggins is healthy enough to be active for a game or two before we "forget" him?For all we know Blount got carries today only because Huggins wasn't available.
Sorry Huggins owner, he will be a decent 3rd down/scat back, but nothing more and not good for fantasy purposes.
 
heidbrink said:
Couch Potato said:
heidbrink said:
We seem to have wasted a lot of ink (and perhaps waiver moves) debating Huggins vs Graham last week.
Huggins was listed as inactive due to injury. Everyone so far has failed to mention that point.
Thanks. Good info there. So the hype train is not derailed just yet. Still, I don't recall anybody here who saw this (Blount) coming.
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...&p=12324374
 
davearm said:
timschochet said:
1. Blount is clearly the #2 RB on this team- you can forget about Huggins.
Shouldn't we wait to see what happens when Huggins is healthy enough to be active for a game or two before we "forget" him?For all we know Blount got carries today only because Huggins wasn't available.
i'd rather have the guy who's healthy and getting carries in real games.
 
davearm said:
timschochet said:
1. Blount is clearly the #2 RB on this team- you can forget about Huggins.
Shouldn't we wait to see what happens when Huggins is healthy enough to be active for a game or two before we "forget" him?For all we know Blount got carries today only because Huggins wasn't available.
i'd rather have the guy who's healthy and getting carries in real games.
That's fair. But that's not the same thing as forgetting about the guy that has (presumably) been higher on the depth chart all season.
 
davearm said:
timschochet said:
1. Blount is clearly the #2 RB on this team- you can forget about Huggins.
Shouldn't we wait to see what happens when Huggins is healthy enough to be active for a game or two before we "forget" him?For all we know Blount got carries today only because Huggins wasn't available.
Sorry Huggins owner, he will be a decent 3rd down/scat back, but nothing more and not good for fantasy purposes.
LOL as if owning Huggins means anything. We're talking about end-of-the-bench lottery ticket type players here, not cornerstone guys that an owner might have a lot invested in.Just to be clear, I'm not predicting big things for Huggins. I just object to the notion that he should be forgotten before he's even seen the field.Given the same opportunity, perhaps Huggins would've been more impressive than Blount was.
 
davearm said:
timschochet said:
1. Blount is clearly the #2 RB on this team- you can forget about Huggins.
Shouldn't we wait to see what happens when Huggins is healthy enough to be active for a game or two before we "forget" him?For all we know Blount got carries today only because Huggins wasn't available.
Sorry Huggins owner, he will be a decent 3rd down/scat back, but nothing more and not good for fantasy purposes.
Given the same opportunity, perhaps Huggins would've been more impressive than Blount was.
um...ok.
 
davearm said:
timschochet said:
1. Blount is clearly the #2 RB on this team- you can forget about Huggins.
Shouldn't we wait to see what happens when Huggins is healthy enough to be active for a game or two before we "forget" him?For all we know Blount got carries today only because Huggins wasn't available.
Sorry Huggins owner, he will be a decent 3rd down/scat back, but nothing more and not good for fantasy purposes.
LOL as if owning Huggins means anything. We're talking about end-of-the-bench lottery ticket type players here, not cornerstone guys that an owner might have a lot invested in.Just to be clear, I'm not predicting big things for Huggins. I just object to the notion that he should be forgotten before he's even seen the field.Given the same opportunity, perhaps Huggins would've been more impressive than Blount was.
Their playing styles are completely different. Huggins has straight line speed and if he can come thru or around the line untouched, he has the opportunity to take it for a large gain.. Problem is that he usually goes down after first contact, he doesn't break tackles well.. He's also a lousy blocker.. For these reasons, until he is able to better his game in those areas, he doesn't make a good every down back.Blount on the other hand is stronger coming through the line, harder to take down, and is a pretty good blocker. Probably less opportunities to break those huge plays, but better chance of getting the 1st downs when you need them. Blount can move the chains...
 
moderated said:
Otter said:
Garbage yards with the game out of hand in the 4th quarter.
Wrong, his yards were gained early in the game.
He is as good as Huggins, but Graham is still the true backup if things get sticky (read an injury to Caddy)Blount has some dynasty potential though.
 
Blount was way more effective running inside than Caddy was. I wouldn't write off Caddy though because Chris Johnson had trouble moving the ball on them the week before. Maybe a large back is what it takes to move the ball on Pittsburgh. With him emerging I don't see Caddy getting 25 carries a game anymore but he will still be the guy.

 
davearm said:
timschochet said:
1. Blount is clearly the #2 RB on this team- you can forget about Huggins.
Shouldn't we wait to see what happens when Huggins is healthy enough to be active for a game or two before we "forget" him?For all we know Blount got carries today only because Huggins wasn't available.
Sorry Huggins owner, he will be a decent 3rd down/scat back, but nothing more and not good for fantasy purposes.
I agree, Huggins name probably won't come up until the 2nd half of the season now. Blount looks like he will be, or is quickly on his way to being the #2. If the power running game is effective I could easily see him getting half of the carries. EG will still get a TD and see some time every once and a while.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
People are making a lot of bold statements after six (6) carries.Six carries.
I agree, but that's 6 more regular season carries than Huggins had before people here were making some pretty bold predictions about his future in the league..You have to admit though, he did look pretty good, more effective then Caddy today, and is better suited for the RB 2 position then Huggins. Graham hasn't looked bad either, so I expect he's still a decent obstacle, but Blount did everything he was supposed to do, and looked good doing it. And against good opposition...One thing that shouldn't be over looked though, he's never been a big receiving threat. That's not to say he can't be, but in total, he had 4 rec in college.
 
In dynasty If I had room I'd look to acquire both Huggins and Blount. Caddy isn't long for this world and one of those guys may get a shot. Blount did look pretty good in the few touches he got, one of the few bright spots for the Bucs today. Huggins isn't too small to be a lead back in a RBBC. The league is moving toward smaller, quicker guys. Be interesting to see how it plays out over the long term.

 
ImTheScientist said:
Bri said:
Blount's no starter IMO. He could fill in but...even if Tampa does start him, next year he'd be replaced just like Graham.
You obviously didn't watch Pac-10 football. :bag:
Well when guys get to the NFL, things can look different. He is not close to being as good as Ringer or CJ. Granted CJ was expected but Ringer's a backup in the NFL and Blount went to Tampa and has been a backup too.If your argument is "time to develop" well that's reasonable but right now, he's no starter. Maybe over a "hasbeen" or another "nobody" but like I said above, he'll be replaced the following year just like Graham. Teams want gazelles.Maybe Earnest isn't a good enough example. How about Marion Barber in Dallas? He's spent his whole career keeping up with the Jones'. I'm not saying Blount=Barber it's just that teams will always go after gazelles. Travis Henry has like 1300 and the Titans drafted their gazelle. He happened to be their second as they realized Chris Henry was "just fast" and wasted a pick on him the year before. If Blount gets a shot and does well, I really think FFers should trade him while they can and that he'll be replaced or sharing the backfield in 2011. Don't forget Gado did as well as Blount during his time with the Titans either.
 
ImTheScientist said:
Bri said:
Blount's no starter IMO. He could fill in but...even if Tampa does start him, next year he'd be replaced just like Graham.
You obviously didn't watch Pac-10 football. :bag:
Well when guys get to the NFL, things can look different. He is not close to being as good as Ringer or CJ. Granted CJ was expected but Ringer's a backup in the NFL and Blount went to Tampa and has been a backup too.If your argument is "time to develop" well that's reasonable but right now, he's no starter. Maybe over a "hasbeen" or another "nobody" but like I said above, he'll be replaced the following year just like Graham. Teams want gazelles.Maybe Earnest isn't a good enough example. How about Marion Barber in Dallas? He's spent his whole career keeping up with the Jones'. I'm not saying Blount=Barber it's just that teams will always go after gazelles. Travis Henry has like 1300 and the Titans drafted their gazelle. He happened to be their second as they realized Chris Henry was "just fast" and wasted a pick on him the year before. If Blount gets a shot and does well, I really think FFers should trade him while they can and that he'll be replaced or sharing the backfield in 2011. Don't forget Gado did as well as Blount during his time with the Titans either.
Blount may not be the back of the future for the Bucs, but I disagree with your reasoning.There are many teams in the league that run a hard nose type, punishing running game. I think there are more starting RB's in the league that resemble Frank Gore's running style, then do Chris Johnson's..
 
Blount may not be the back of the future for the Bucs, but I disagree with your reasoning.There are many teams in the league that run a hard nose type, punishing running game. I think there are more starting RB's in the league that resemble Frank Gore's running style, then do Chris Johnson's..
fair point
 
Link

Bucs RB LeGarrette Blount made a surprise appearance, debuting during the first quarter just three weeks after joining the roster — before even getting a complete handle on the offensive playbook. But it turns out the Bucs had even bigger plans for Blount than the six rushes for 27 yards and a touchdown he produced. Had the game not become so lopsided, coach Raheem Morris said, Blount would have played more. "Blount went out and ran the ball well, ran it physical," Morris said of the undrafted rookie out of Oregon claimed off waivers Sept. 6. " … It could have been a different outcome if we were able to get the lead and use him the way I had planned for (Sunday). When you play a good team, it doesn't always play (out) how you planned." Said Blount: "It is kind of frustrating to play catch-up. But if we're down, you know you're not going to be running the ball and you're going to be in pass-first situations. That's what we had to do. They had us backed into a corner." So, Blount had to settle for averaging 4.5 yards on his handful of carries. But even with the limited action, he showed he can be an asset to a running attack that has been punchless. Blount ripped off a bruising 12-yard run on his first carry and battered the defense with each run. The key to Blount playing more extensively likely lies in his ability to help in pass protection. That's where his lack of mastery of the playbook becomes problematic. But with the bye week coming, Blount has time to cram.
 
While I was watching I thought Earnest Graham clearly looked like the most explosive, reliable option the bucs have at running back. I'm not sure why he was only given 2 carries. this is a man who has proven in the past he can carry the load, and look pretty good doing it.

 
The violent, undrafted and has been cut already Blount is who we are talkin about on this board?

Does this board just jump on any one and love them on 2 carries or preseason games? Like the board did with Huggins, Mike X, and half a million other players, I'll stick to what i see with my own eyes then the random "You need to pick this guy up"

which reminds me, just cuz you hope he will do well, don't actually mean he will.

...and p.s. that game yesterday was never close, so no carries after the first half actually mattered.

I do not like Blount and quite frankly, dont think he should be on a team... but look at the bright side if he punches Caddy, and hurts him, he could start. History says he will puch someone.

 
I'll stick to what i see with my own eyes then the random "You need to pick this guy up"
Pretty sure that's what's going on here, mate.Nobody was going to be interested in Blount thanks to his mediocre statline yesterday. But the folks who got to see him saw that he absolutely brutalized the Steeler defense on a couple carries, which is not something very many backs are doing these days.I play redrafts, so this guy's not of much consequence to me, I don't believe. But if I were playing dynasty, and were rostering anyone I wasn't absolutely sold on, Blount would be a serious target for me this week. I like his long term prospects a lot now that I've seen a sample of what he can do against the most adverse circumstances imaginable (which is to say, the first string Steeler D). And I think at some point, he'll get in there and produce really nice starter's numbers until he blows a fuse and shoves a woman down a flight of stairs.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top