I think he's more of an AJ clone personally.
He's not really a clone of anyone, but the receiver I see him most frequently draw comparisons to is the guy he was drafted to replace- Brandon Marshall.
Well any of those outcomes would be satisfactory. Really what it's saying is that this guy has elite upside. Dez seems like more of a sure thing I think. But does he have DT's upside?
Well, it might say that Demaryius has elite upside, or it might say that most people are fond of comparing incoming prospects to current established studs. I mean, you never hear anyone say "he's 95% the prospect Charles Rodgers was", even though by all accounts they should, because Charles Rodgers was the second best WR prospect of the past decade.Either way, I don't think you should be basing judgments on a player's upside on what crazy comparisons people are making about him. Demaryius's upside is no higher if people are comparing him to Andre Johnson than it is if they're comparing him to Roy E. Williams. Ultimately, the
only thing that impacts Bay-Bay's upside is Bay-Bay himself.
Also, I think that Bryant has a higher upside than Thomas. Why? Because I think Bryant is a better WR. His measurables might not be as eye-popping (although he's far from a slouch, himself), but measurables only take a player so far. Matt Jones had some of the best measurables in the league. Larry Fitzgerald's are merely good, not great. Would anyone say that Matt Jones has a higher upside than Larry Fitzgerald, though?