What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

DYNASTY: 2012 Top college prospects (1 Viewer)

Stanford's Luck displays complete package at quarterback

By Bucky Brooks NFL.com

Analyst

Each Monday throughout the college football season, NFL.com draft expert Bucky Brooks has shared his notes and evaluations on potential NFL prospects for the 2012 draft and beyond. Today, he gives a first-hand scouting report of Stanford QB Andrew Luck.

PALO ALTO, Calif. -- Andrew Luck is the real deal.

It's not my intent to add to the endless hype that has surrounded the Stanford star over the past two seasons, but that is my opinion after getting an up-close look at his remarkable performance against Notre Dame this weekend. Luck simply possesses everything a QB needs to succeed at the next level, including...

Throws

The toughest part of evaluating quarterbacks on tape is accurately gauging their arm strength. You can't determine the speed and velocity of their throws without knowing the impact of the weather elements. Luck, however, possesses enough arm strength to make all the requisite throws in a pro offense. He can deliver pinpoint passes on deep outs from the opposite hash with zip, while also throwing the seam route on a rope from 25 yards away. He combines his superior arm strength with a deft touch that allows him to routinely lob high-arching tosses to a closely defended tight end or receiver on corner routes.

Luck's arm isn't as strong as Matthew Stafford's or Jay Cutler's, but he certainly shows the ability to fit the ball into tight windows from distance. Against Notre Dame, the Cardinal receivers had difficulty separating from their defenders, so Luck was routinely forced to squeeze the ball into contested areas. Yet he completed 20 of 30 passes for 233 yards with four touchdowns and one interception.

Luck grades out well in accuracy and ball placement. He routinely puts the ball on the receiver's upfield shoulder, which leads to valuable yardage after the catch.

Fundamentals

Luck's technique is ready-made for the NFL. He has a compact windup and an over-the-top throwing motion. He appears to take his front hand off the ball earlier than most QBs, but his quick release and superb ball security make it a non-issue. Luck displays polished footwork in the pocket. He quickly retreats from under center on three-, five- and seven-step drops, and steps up with balance at the top of his drop. Interestingly, he uses a staggered stance with his left foot back when taking snaps from center. Even though this is a stance utilized by quarterbacks at every level, the placement of his left foot is a bit unorthodox for right-handed throwers. However, Aaron Rodgers uses a similar stance and it appears to allow him to get more depth in his drops, while still retaining his set-up quickness.

Luck also shows good set-up quickness when operating from the shotgun. His ability to catch, rock and throw allows him to connect on quick routes like hitches, slants and crossers from empty formations. His timing was superb on those throws, and he peppered Notre Dame's defense with an assortment of quick-rhythm tosses.

Extraordinary awareness allows Luck to routinely step forward when the pocket is crumbling off the edges. This helps him minimize lost yardage on sacks, which helps Stanford's offense remain on schedule.

Athletic ability

Luck is an underrated athlete and crafty runner on the edges who routinely extends plays with his feet. His ability to operate on the perimeter allows the team to utilize an assortment of bootleg and naked passes, which are staples of West Coast offensive systems.

More importantly, Luck shows the ability to avoid rushers in the pocket with nifty sidesteps. With pass rushers in the NFL possessing the speed and quickness of collegiate linebackers and safeties, it is essential to have a quarterback with these skills.

'It' factor

As much as physical ability is factored into the evaluation process for quarterbacks, certain intangibles set some guys apart. The most important one is the "it" factor. Does a player inspire confidence in others with his leadership and performance in critical situations?

Luck absolutely shines in this area. His presence in the huddle inspires his teammates and they raise their collective level of play when he is on the field. The Cardinal doesn't appear to have a wealth of NFL-caliber talent at their skill positions, meaning the pressure to win falls squarely on Luck's shoulders.

Against Notre Dame, Luck wasn't at his best for most of the game, but still delivered a handful of key plays that sealed the outcome in the Cardinal's favor. He masterfully directed a two-minute drill prior to halftime, which showcased his ability to thrive under pressure. He connected on four of five passes for 47 yards, including an 11-yard touchdown pass to Ty Montgomery. He added 11 rushing yards on the drive, including a quarterback scamper for a first down.

The big picture

The demands of playing quarterback extend beyond producing big numbers. It is about finding a way to win through proper management of game situations. Luck possesses the rare ability to orchestrate the game from the line of scrimmage. He calls his own plays in the Cardinal's no-huddle package, and that freedom even extends to the team's regular offense. According to Stanford coach David Shaw, Luck comes to the line with three different plays to choose from based on the defensive alignment. He identifies the defensive front and coverage and makes the appropriate call for each situation. This is remarkable considering some pro quarterbacks aren't capable of the same task. For Luck to have extensive experience in this area gives him a decided advantage over others at the position.
 
Week 13 Rewind: Miller makes most of short Hurricane season

By Rob Rang | The Sports Xchange/CBSSports.com

Each week, we rewind the game film to highlight the star-worthy performances that could affect the 2012 draft rankings:

• Two big-time NFL talent producers saw their seasons end in November. Due to mistakes off the field, there will be no bowl games for Miami (Fla.) and Southern California, making their Thanksgiving weekend games the final opportunity for some players to make an impression on scouts.

USC's talented trio of quarterback Matt Barkley, offensive tackle Matt Kalil and defensive end Nick Perry played well against UCLA, but they've earned plenty of national attention, including being highlighted by NFLDraftScout.com.

On the other hand, it has been a stormy first season for Al Golden's Hurricanes. The play of a few underclassmen offered a bit of a silver lining to the dark clouds that have accumulated this season, including during a 24-17 home loss on Senior Day to Boston College.

Redshirt sophomore running back Lamar Miller has been Miami's most consistent weapon on offense. In refusing to commit to return to school in a postgame interview, he gave credence to the rumblings that he might leave early for the NFL.

If Friday night's game was the last for Miller in a Miami uniform, scouts will have plenty of praise-worthy game film.

There is a lot to like about Miller. The most obvious is that Miller has the trait that every team in the NFL is looking for -- the breakaway speed to make big plays on his own, which he displayed in the first quarter. Miller attacked the line of scrimmage, broke right and out-ran BC defenders to score a 79-yard touchdown and give the Hurricanes an early 14-7 lead.

The run was the longest against a BCS opponent for a Miami back since James Jackson's 79-yard scamper against the Eagles back in 1998.

Miller also had a 63-yard run taken back due to a holding penalty. Had he been credited with the run, Miller would have registered 177 rushing yards -- the most allowed by Luke Kuechly and Boston College to a back all season long. Perhaps most impressive, Miller would have accomplished the feat on just 12 carries. Miller has a lean, athletic build at 212 pounds and makes up for a lack of true power with determined running. The competitiveness carries through in Miller's pass blocking -- he's willing to face up defenders.

In rushing for 114 yards against the Eagles, Miller finished the year second in the ACC in rushing (1,272 yards), moving past Clinton Portis and Ottis Anderson with the third highest single-season rushing total in Miami history.

Trent Richardson is the elite running back in the country. Scouts will tell you there isn't yet a consensus No. 2 back behind him, however. Miller's speed and the fact that he has fresh legs after only one season as a starter could help convince teams he's an ascending star and worthy of late first- to mid-second-round consideration.

• As it does every year, rivalry weekend produced some of the more memorable games and performances of the year. One such performance was the North Carolina State Wolfpack overcoming a 27-point second-half deficit to beat Maryland and earn bowl eligibility.

Several N.C. State players deserve kudos for scoring 42 unanswered points, but the athlete who left scouts gawking was senior linebacker Audie Cole.

At 6-4 and 240 pounds, Cole is a stout presence at inside linebacker. He is quick to attack gaps and has the strength to fight through blocks and make the play at the line of scrimmage. Cole's quickness toward the line isn't as impressive as his speed running parallel to and through the line -- which could lead to a position change in the NFL.

When allowed to rush off the edge, Cole can beat opponents with his burst, a powerful bull rush and some legitimate pass rush technique, including an effective swim move. He's a bit tight-hipped but his very good speed makes him effective in coverage. He is a physical player who'll knock off receivers and backs off their routes as they cross his zone. These skills make him a better fit outside, as he had played throughout his career prior to moving inside as a senior to help NC State offset the loss of Nate Irving, the Denver Broncos' third-round pick last April.

Cole registered nine tackles against the Terrapins. Though he never got home as a pass rusher in this game, he did pressure Maryland quarterback C.J. Brown on multiple occasions, including on the decisive touchdown scored on a 59-yard interception return by Wolfpack cornerback C.J. Wilson with just 27 seconds remaining.

Cole hasn't received a great deal of national attention -- certainly not as much Zach Brown of North Carolina. Some scouts, however, feel the gap between the two is next to nothing and it could be Cole, not Brown, who flies up the board during the all-star game and workout portion of the pre-draft process.

• North Carolina State's Audie Cole could rise up draft boards in part due to the fact the 2012 class of outside linebackers appears to be a weak one. Arkansas' Tramain Thomas is rising despite the fact that scouts say this year's crop of safeties is shaping up to be a pretty solid one.

It would have been easy to look past Thomas' contributions to the Razorbacks defense against top-ranked LSU. The Tigers scored 42 points on Arkansas and LSU's tandem of Morris Claiborne and Tyrann Mathieu certainly left little limelight for anyone else to enjoy.

The 6-foot, 204-pound Thomas was one of the few Razorbacks to match the Tigers' physicality Friday night. His big hit forced a fumble by LSU running back Michael Ford in the second quarter that Razorback linebacker Alonzo Highsmith returned 47 yards for a touchdown.

In the third quarter, Thomas ended a promising LSU drive by stepping in front of a Jordan Jefferson pass for an interception defending the Arkansas 12-yard line.

Perhaps the most impressive element of Thomas' performance was that the flashy plays just described accompanied steady open-field tackling and sound coverage. Despite this, Thomas was inexplicably kept on the sideline for a few snaps later in the third quarter. Not surprisingly, the Razorbacks paid the price. Shoddy tackling and poor angles helped Ford break free for a 49-yard run to the Arkansas 6-yard line in the closing minutes of the quarter.

The Razorbacks shuttled Thomas back onto the field and watched as their senior all-conference defender helped keep LSU out of the end zone. Thomas provided a physical pop to running back Kenny Hilliard to on second down and sliced in front of star wideout Rueben Randle to prevent a touchdown reception on 3rd down, keeping the game within one score as the game entered the final quarter.

• Upon Further Review highlights a player whose performance over the weekend significantly altered my earlier assessment.

The 2011 Ohio State-Michigan game may not have roused the media hoopla past editions of this fabulous rivalry once did, but scouts long ago circled Saturday as a prime opportunity to scout prospects from both schools under optimum conditions.

Just as how a win over a hated rival can earn a struggling coach another year at the helm, a strong performance in a big rivalry game can help fans and scouts look past a disappointing season.

At least, Ohio State wide receiver DeVier Posey can only hope that's true.

Posey was suspended for the first 10 games of this season by the NCAA and Ohio State for accepting improper benefits, first in the infamous tattoo scandal and also for being overpaid for a summer job. As such, the 6-2, 210-pound Posey, who ended his junior season with 16 touchdowns on 124 career receptions, entered the Michigan game having only caught four passes (for 66 yards) this year.

Posey only caught three more passes Saturday against the Wolverines, but showed the speed to get deep, catching a 43-yard toss from Braxton Miller just before halftime to give the underdog Buckeyes a 24-23 lead. The big play will leave a positive impression on scouts which could help Posey land an opportunity in a prominent senior all-star game.

If given the chance to do so, the senior could use the fact that he's not as physically worn down as most to enjoy a strong week of practice and see his stock rise as the draft approaches.
 
Just watched the Nebraska and Wisconsin highlights of Montreal Ball. He looks pretty beastly. Where would you rank him against the other rookie RBs next year? What are his measurables?
The thing with Ball is that he plays behind Wisconsin's fantastic O-Line. His stats are godly but this is the same school that has made the likes of Ron Dayne, PJ Hill and John Clay look outstanding in college. I'm skeptical of him right now but that might change during the pre-draft process when scouts start weighing in.
Ball seems to be a different type of RB to me. Dayne, Hill and Clay were more big pounders where I feel Ball is more elusive. I think he is more of a pro style RB than the others were.
 
If you could build the prototype body frame for a RB, would it be Trent Richardson?

- 5'11" (maybe 5'10" is more perfect?)

- 224lbs (perfect)

But, beyond the usual height and weight, the most defining feature are his legs. His unusual bow-legged stance gives him a wide/low base and change of direction that I can't remember ever seeing in a runner with his ability. Couple the wide base with the 600-700lb squat ability and you have something that NFL defenders are going to fear for a while.

4.3 speed would be a nice added bonus, but with everything else in his arsenal I think 4.5 type speed will be just fine.

Can't wait to see him at the next level.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just watched the Nebraska and Wisconsin highlights of Montreal Ball. He looks pretty beastly. Where would you rank him against the other rookie RBs next year? What are his measurables?
The thing with Ball is that he plays behind Wisconsin's fantastic O-Line. His stats are godly but this is the same school that has made the likes of Ron Dayne, PJ Hill and John Clay look outstanding in college. I'm skeptical of him right now but that might change during the pre-draft process when scouts start weighing in.
Ball seems to be a different type of RB to me. Dayne, Hill and Clay were more big pounders where I feel Ball is more elusive. I think he is more of a pro style RB than the others were.
comparing Ball to those Wisconsin players is like comparing Ben with Mike Tomczak, Jim Miller or Kordell Stewart since they were all Steeler QB's. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me
 
If you could build the prototype body frame for a RB, would it be Trent Richardson?- 5'11" (maybe 5'10" is more perfect?)- 224lbs (perfect)But, beyond the usual height and weight, the most defining feature are his legs. His unusual bow-legged stance gives him a wide/low base and change of direction that I can't remember ever seeing in a runner with his ability. Couple the wide base with the 600-700lb squat ability and you have something that NFL defenders are going to fear for a while.4.3 speed would be a nice added bonus, but with everything else in his arsenal I think 4.5 type speed will be just fine. Can't wait to see him at the next level.
I have been slow to call him the "next ____" or "best since____", mostly because I hadn't watched him quite as much this year. But my god, this kid is good. He has made strides in his overall game from year to year, which is a very good sign. If I am a fan of a team in the top 10, I still don't use the pick on him. But he might be my favorite back since McFadden, if not Peterson.
 
RGIII is going to go a lot higher in rookie drafts than he would have had Cam Newton not done what he has.

Assuming NFL teams grade this guy out as a top 10 pick, I think he is the better fantasy option than Luck. Luck could end up being a top 2-3 QB during his career and not put up the (fantasy) numbers that Cam Newton is now. If RGIII is ever considered even a top 10 QB, with the potetnial he offers on the ground, as with Newton, watch out.

Curios on other's opinions of Griffin as an NFL prospect and future dynasty rookie pick.

I won't put him on par with Newton, whose body is not from this world, but he can do a lot of the same things. He is smart (4.0/Master's degree), accurate, confident, fast, has an NFL arm, and projects to offer 4-7 pts/game on the ground.

 
There aren't three NFL RBs I would trade Richardson for in a dynasty league. He's as can't-miss as a RB can be.

As for Griffin, I haven't seen enough of him to comment on his prospects, but I agree that he'll benefit from Newton's success. Just looking at their listed measurables, one thing that stands out is that he's only listed at 6'2". A lack of height hasn't stopped Vick from being successful, but Griffin is built like a WR whereas Newton is built like a TE/DE. I think this could be a factor at the goal line, where Newton has earned a lot of his keep this year on short rushing TDs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There aren't three NFL RBs I would trade Richardson for in a dynasty league. He's as can't-miss as a RB can be. As for Griffin, I haven't seen enough of him to comment on his prospects, but I agree that he'll benefit from Newton's success. Just looking at their listed measurables, one thing that stands out is that he's only listed at 6'2". A lack of height hasn't stopped Vick from being successful, but Griffin is built like a WR whereas Newton is built like a TE/DE. I think this could be a factor at the goal line, where Newton has earned a lot of his keep this year on short rushing TDs.
Playing in a game as loaded with talent as Bama/LSU and standing out as the best player on the field is a big thing. I am drinking the Kool-Aid, but can't call anyone can't miss, based on my eyes alone. There are questions about that 6'2" listing too. I think 6050 is more likely. And you're right, he is much smaller than Newton. Perhands Griffin is somewhere in the middle of Vick and Cam.
 
Been a long time since I've been on the forum. Is the Barkley hype in full swing yet?

Not sure why it would have taken this long. This class appears to be pretty loaded at QB as a matter of fact. Griffin kind of came out of nowhere.

 
Been a long time since I've been on the forum. Is the Barkley hype in full swing yet? Not sure why it would have taken this long. This class appears to be pretty loaded at QB as a matter of fact. Griffin kind of came out of nowhere.
I have my reservations about Barkley. Namely his supporting cast, he's throwing to two of the best receivers in College Football and also because he plays for USC which hasn't exactly been a QB factory of late producing Matt Leinart (bust) and Mark Sanchez (meh). I wouldn't rank Barkley too highly.
 
There aren't three NFL RBs I would trade Richardson for in a dynasty league. He's as can't-miss as a RB can be. As for Griffin, I haven't seen enough of him to comment on his prospects, but I agree that he'll benefit from Newton's success. Just looking at their listed measurables, one thing that stands out is that he's only listed at 6'2". A lack of height hasn't stopped Vick from being successful, but Griffin is built like a WR whereas Newton is built like a TE/DE. I think this could be a factor at the goal line, where Newton has earned a lot of his keep this year on short rushing TDs.
Does that mean you're leaving me Blackmon for the 1.02 pick I traded for in HAL3?
 
Been a long time since I've been on the forum. Is the Barkley hype in full swing yet? Not sure why it would have taken this long. This class appears to be pretty loaded at QB as a matter of fact. Griffin kind of came out of nowhere.
I have my reservations about Barkley. Namely his supporting cast, he's throwing to two of the best receivers in College Football and also because he plays for USC which hasn't exactly been a QB factory of late producing Matt Leinart (bust) and Mark Sanchez (meh). I wouldn't rank Barkley too highly.
Do you consider Kyle Boller and Aaron Rodgers similar? Never understood why people falsely relate players who happen to choose to go to the same school. It's pretty silly.
 
Been a long time since I've been on the forum. Is the Barkley hype in full swing yet? Not sure why it would have taken this long. This class appears to be pretty loaded at QB as a matter of fact. Griffin kind of came out of nowhere.
I have my reservations about Barkley. Namely his supporting cast, he's throwing to two of the best receivers in College Football and also because he plays for USC which hasn't exactly been a QB factory of late producing Matt Leinart (bust) and Mark Sanchez (meh). I wouldn't rank Barkley too highly.
Do you consider Kyle Boller and Aaron Rodgers similar? Never understood why people falsely relate players who happen to choose to go to the same school. It's pretty silly.
I've always thought that was kind of stupid also.
 
Been a long time since I've been on the forum. Is the Barkley hype in full swing yet? Not sure why it would have taken this long. This class appears to be pretty loaded at QB as a matter of fact. Griffin kind of came out of nowhere.
I have my reservations about Barkley. Namely his supporting cast, he's throwing to two of the best receivers in College Football and also because he plays for USC which hasn't exactly been a QB factory of late producing Matt Leinart (bust) and Mark Sanchez (meh). I wouldn't rank Barkley too highly.
Do you consider Kyle Boller and Aaron Rodgers similar? Never understood why people falsely relate players who happen to choose to go to the same school. It's pretty silly.
I've always thought that was kind of stupid also.
Agrred especially when they are not under the same coaches/system as the previous guy(s).
 
I don't like pigeonholing players based on their school either, but it's not totally insane.

I think it's good to be aware of a school's tradition because it can help put a player's performance into perspective. Montee Ball ripped it up this season, but so did John Clay and James White last year. Ball might still be a good RB, but it's pretty clear that Wisconsin's supporting cast and offensive system inflates RB stats.

As for USC, one of the constants with that program in recent seasons has been a high level of talent at WR (and everywhere else). Mike Williams, Keary Colbert, Dominique Byrd, Dwayne Jarrett, Steve Smith, Fred Davis, Patrick Turner, etc. Not many of these guys have amounted to anything at the NFL level, but several of them were great college players. When you're a decent QB surrounded by great talent, it can really help your numbers.

I think Barkley has the potential to be a good QB, but one thing the national media doesn't give enough ink to is the quality of his receivers. Woods and Lee are pretty easily the best WR duo in college football. If they were in the SEC, they would have the hype to go along with the skills. But since they're in the Pac-12 and they're playing for a team that can't get into a bowl game, no one talks about them. They have been a big part of Barkley's success.

 
I don't like pigeonholing players based on their school either, but it's not totally insane. I think it's good to be aware of a school's tradition because it can help put a player's performance into perspective. Montee Ball ripped it up this season, but so did John Clay and James White last year. Ball might still be a good RB, but it's pretty clear that Wisconsin's supporting cast and offensive system inflates RB stats.As for USC, one of the constants with that program in recent seasons has been a high level of talent at WR (and everywhere else). Mike Williams, Keary Colbert, Dominique Byrd, Dwayne Jarrett, Steve Smith, Fred Davis, Patrick Turner, etc. Not many of these guys have amounted to anything at the NFL level, but several of them were great college players. When you're a decent QB surrounded by great talent, it can really help your numbers. I think Barkley has the potential to be a good QB, but one thing the national media doesn't give enough ink to is the quality of his receivers. Woods and Lee are pretty easily the best WR duo in college football. If they were in the SEC, they would have the hype to go along with the skills. But since they're in the Pac-12 and they're playing for a team that can't get into a bowl game, no one talks about them. They have been a big part of Barkley's success.
This was my argument against Sam Bradford. Amazing weapons around him at Oklahoma, plus Jason White put up huge numbers in the same system.
 
I don't like pigeonholing players based on their school either, but it's not totally insane. I think it's good to be aware of a school's tradition because it can help put a player's performance into perspective. Montee Ball ripped it up this season, but so did John Clay and James White last year. Ball might still be a good RB, but it's pretty clear that Wisconsin's supporting cast and offensive system inflates RB stats.As for USC, one of the constants with that program in recent seasons has been a high level of talent at WR (and everywhere else). Mike Williams, Keary Colbert, Dominique Byrd, Dwayne Jarrett, Steve Smith, Fred Davis, Patrick Turner, etc. Not many of these guys have amounted to anything at the NFL level, but several of them were great college players. When you're a decent QB surrounded by great talent, it can really help your numbers. I think Barkley has the potential to be a good QB, but one thing the national media doesn't give enough ink to is the quality of his receivers. Woods and Lee are pretty easily the best WR duo in college football. If they were in the SEC, they would have the hype to go along with the skills. But since they're in the Pac-12 and they're playing for a team that can't get into a bowl game, no one talks about them. They have been a big part of Barkley's success.
Ball is a lot different player than Clay though.Faster...better moves...and uses his "power" better IMO.Also decent catching the ball too.I think Ball is one of their most pro-ready RBs they have had.
 
I don't like pigeonholing players based on their school either, but it's not totally insane. I think it's good to be aware of a school's tradition because it can help put a player's performance into perspective. Montee Ball ripped it up this season, but so did John Clay and James White last year. Ball might still be a good RB, but it's pretty clear that Wisconsin's supporting cast and offensive system inflates RB stats.As for USC, one of the constants with that program in recent seasons has been a high level of talent at WR (and everywhere else). Mike Williams, Keary Colbert, Dominique Byrd, Dwayne Jarrett, Steve Smith, Fred Davis, Patrick Turner, etc. Not many of these guys have amounted to anything at the NFL level, but several of them were great college players. When you're a decent QB surrounded by great talent, it can really help your numbers. I think Barkley has the potential to be a good QB, but one thing the national media doesn't give enough ink to is the quality of his receivers. Woods and Lee are pretty easily the best WR duo in college football. If they were in the SEC, they would have the hype to go along with the skills. But since they're in the Pac-12 and they're playing for a team that can't get into a bowl game, no one talks about them. They have been a big part of Barkley's success.
Ball is a lot different player than Clay though.Faster...better moves...and uses his "power" better IMO.Also decent catching the ball too.I think Ball is one of their most pro-ready RBs they have had.
I agree that Ball is a much better prospect than Clay, but that doesn't change the fact that he plays in a friendly system that inflates his numbers. Would he be getting all this hype if he played for Stanford or Arizona State? Stepfan Taylor and Cameron Marshall have had pretty good seasons and are probably comparable to Ball in terms of talent level, but you never hear about them because they don't play for Wisconsin and get all those goal line carries. I'm just saying that when you evaluate a prospect, you have to try to account for how his situation might have impacted his results. It doesn't mean that every player surrounded by a great supporting cast is a fraud or that every player on a junky team is actually a superstar. It's just something to consider. With Ball, I think you have to try to separate the player from the stats because even a craptastic RB like John Clay was able to dominate in that system.
 
'EBF said:
'sho nuff said:
'EBF said:
I don't like pigeonholing players based on their school either, but it's not totally insane. I think it's good to be aware of a school's tradition because it can help put a player's performance into perspective. Montee Ball ripped it up this season, but so did John Clay and James White last year. Ball might still be a good RB, but it's pretty clear that Wisconsin's supporting cast and offensive system inflates RB stats.As for USC, one of the constants with that program in recent seasons has been a high level of talent at WR (and everywhere else). Mike Williams, Keary Colbert, Dominique Byrd, Dwayne Jarrett, Steve Smith, Fred Davis, Patrick Turner, etc. Not many of these guys have amounted to anything at the NFL level, but several of them were great college players. When you're a decent QB surrounded by great talent, it can really help your numbers. I think Barkley has the potential to be a good QB, but one thing the national media doesn't give enough ink to is the quality of his receivers. Woods and Lee are pretty easily the best WR duo in college football. If they were in the SEC, they would have the hype to go along with the skills. But since they're in the Pac-12 and they're playing for a team that can't get into a bowl game, no one talks about them. They have been a big part of Barkley's success.
Ball is a lot different player than Clay though.Faster...better moves...and uses his "power" better IMO.Also decent catching the ball too.I think Ball is one of their most pro-ready RBs they have had.
I agree that Ball is a much better prospect than Clay, but that doesn't change the fact that he plays in a friendly system that inflates his numbers. Would he be getting all this hype if he played for Stanford or Arizona State? Stepfan Taylor and Cameron Marshall have had pretty good seasons and are probably comparable to Ball in terms of talent level, but you never hear about them because they don't play for Wisconsin and get all those goal line carries. I'm just saying that when you evaluate a prospect, you have to try to account for how his situation might have impacted his results. It doesn't mean that every player surrounded by a great supporting cast is a fraud or that every player on a junky team is actually a superstar. It's just something to consider. With Ball, I think you have to try to separate the player from the stats because even a craptastic RB like John Clay was able to dominate in that system.
i guess that would be the case if you were simply looking at production rather than watching him perform and seeing his talent
 
Not exactly Earth-shattering news here, but kinda puts into perspective how good Richardson is:

http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/feed/2011-10/nfl-mock-draft/story/trent-richardson-second-only-to-andrew-luck-in-scouts-eyes

As the college season is nearing its completion, scouts are finishing their fall travels and preparing for postseason all-star games. Throughout 2011 numerous players have moved up and down NFL teams' draft boards based primarily on their on field play, but also because of injuries and some off-the-field concerns.

Below are four players whose stock changed over the past month.

Draft risers

Trent Richardson (5-10, 225 pounds), junior, RB, (Alabama)

The 2011 season was a chance to see how Richardson would play as the Crimson Tide’s No. 1 tailback with Mark Ingram moving to the NFL. Richardson continues to play better and better, especially over the past month.

As a result, many scouts view him as the best player not named Andrew Luck who could be in the 2012 Draft. That assumes both players will enter the draft; Luck also is a junior and has said he would leave Stanford to turn pro.

Richardson is a well-built back who shows strength, balance and competitiveness. He runs through grab tackles to gain yards after contact.

What makes him so special is that for such a physical runner, he has rare foot quickness and agility to change directions in a flash. That allows him to make an explosive jump-cut to get to backside holes with remarkable ease.

When you add in Richardson’s ability as a receiver out of the backfield and hise violence and competitiveness in pass protection, you have the complete back.

Whether he wins the Heisman Trophy or not, you can be sure the if Richardson comes out early he will be a top-five pick. Numerous NFL scouts have told us he is the best running back they have ever evaluated. PROJECTED: Top-five overall
Dumb as it sounds, I'd have to strongly consider him as the RB1 in a dynasty startup.

 
If you could build the prototype body frame for a RB, would it be Trent Richardson?- 5'11" (maybe 5'10" is more perfect?)- 224lbs (perfect)But, beyond the usual height and weight, the most defining feature are his legs. His unusual bow-legged stance gives him a wide/low base and change of direction that I can't remember ever seeing in a runner with his ability. Couple the wide base with the 600-700lb squat ability and you have something that NFL defenders are going to fear for a while.4.3 speed would be a nice added bonus, but with everything else in his arsenal I think 4.5 type speed will be just fine. Can't wait to see him at the next level.
I can't wait to see him run his 40. Very good chance he runs a sub 4.5, something like 4.45.
 
Not exactly Earth-shattering news here, but kinda puts into perspective how good Richardson is:

http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/feed/2011-10/nfl-mock-draft/story/trent-richardson-second-only-to-andrew-luck-in-scouts-eyes

As the college season is nearing its completion, scouts are finishing their fall travels and preparing for postseason all-star games. Throughout 2011 numerous players have moved up and down NFL teams' draft boards based primarily on their on field play, but also because of injuries and some off-the-field concerns.

Below are four players whose stock changed over the past month.

Draft risers

Trent Richardson (5-10, 225 pounds), junior, RB, (Alabama)

The 2011 season was a chance to see how Richardson would play as the Crimson Tide’s No. 1 tailback with Mark Ingram moving to the NFL. Richardson continues to play better and better, especially over the past month.

As a result, many scouts view him as the best player not named Andrew Luck who could be in the 2012 Draft. That assumes both players will enter the draft; Luck also is a junior and has said he would leave Stanford to turn pro.

Richardson is a well-built back who shows strength, balance and competitiveness. He runs through grab tackles to gain yards after contact.

What makes him so special is that for such a physical runner, he has rare foot quickness and agility to change directions in a flash. That allows him to make an explosive jump-cut to get to backside holes with remarkable ease.

When you add in Richardson’s ability as a receiver out of the backfield and hise violence and competitiveness in pass protection, you have the complete back.

Whether he wins the Heisman Trophy or not, you can be sure the if Richardson comes out early he will be a top-five pick. Numerous NFL scouts have told us he is the best running back they have ever evaluated. PROJECTED: Top-five overall
Dumb as it sounds, I'd have to strongly consider him as the RB1 in a dynasty startup.
Depending on where he lands, perhaps.He is as sure of a thing as Peterson was coming out. He has the full package. His strength, agility and speed is a combination that I've never seen before. A guy that can take it the distance, or can run you over. But even though he has the strength, his agility is top tier as well.

He's answered any questions about whether he can be a full-time back, too.

The Rams seems like an interesting potential fit. Fast turf, Sam Bradford and Brandon Lloyd....If they draft Richardson and sign a free agent WR, they could actually be on their way to getting that offense off the ground.

 
Best they ever evaluated?Interesting...but not seeing that at all watching him play.
Indeed, strong words considering Reggie was 6 years ago and Peterson only 5.
Reggie Bush had size concerns and Adrian Peterson had injury prone concerns when being evaluated. Richardson just doesn't have any glaring flaws other than top end speed. If he runs 4.4 anything watch out. (although I expect low/mid 4.5's)
 
Not exactly Earth-shattering news here, but kinda puts into perspective how good Richardson is:

http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/feed/2011-10/nfl-mock-draft/story/trent-richardson-second-only-to-andrew-luck-in-scouts-eyes

As the college season is nearing its completion, scouts are finishing their fall travels and preparing for postseason all-star games. Throughout 2011 numerous players have moved up and down NFL teams' draft boards based primarily on their on field play, but also because of injuries and some off-the-field concerns.

Below are four players whose stock changed over the past month.

Draft risers

Trent Richardson (5-10, 225 pounds), junior, RB, (Alabama)

The 2011 season was a chance to see how Richardson would play as the Crimson Tide’s No. 1 tailback with Mark Ingram moving to the NFL. Richardson continues to play better and better, especially over the past month.

As a result, many scouts view him as the best player not named Andrew Luck who could be in the 2012 Draft. That assumes both players will enter the draft; Luck also is a junior and has said he would leave Stanford to turn pro.

Richardson is a well-built back who shows strength, balance and competitiveness. He runs through grab tackles to gain yards after contact.

What makes him so special is that for such a physical runner, he has rare foot quickness and agility to change directions in a flash. That allows him to make an explosive jump-cut to get to backside holes with remarkable ease.

When you add in Richardson’s ability as a receiver out of the backfield and hise violence and competitiveness in pass protection, you have the complete back.

Whether he wins the Heisman Trophy or not, you can be sure the if Richardson comes out early he will be a top-five pick. Numerous NFL scouts have told us he is the best running back they have ever evaluated. PROJECTED: Top-five overall
Dumb as it sounds, I'd have to strongly consider him as the RB1 in a dynasty startup.
Depending on where he lands, perhaps.He is as sure of a thing as Peterson was coming out. He has the full package. His strength, agility and speed is a combination that I've never seen before. A guy that can take it the distance, or can run you over. But even though he has the strength, his agility is top tier as well.

He's answered any questions about whether he can be a full-time back, too.

The Rams seems like an interesting potential fit. Fast turf, Sam Bradford and Brandon Lloyd....If they draft Richardson and sign a free agent WR, they could actually be on their way to getting that offense off the ground.
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=623538&view=findpost&p=13818770
 
Not a top prospect, but I was pretty impressed with Nelson Rosario last night. 6'5" 220 WR with massive hands. I know Oregon has smallish CBs, but this guy hulked over them like a man among boys. His stat line was 9/98/2, and when I saw that I was surprised it was that low. He was a monster. I don't watch too many Pac12 games, especially UCLA so perhaps he just had a blip instead of something to expect. Anyone that knows more about this guy?

 
Another Baylor to watch as a late rounder and/or UDFA...Terrance Gannaway RB 6'0 240 looks to hae some straightline speed. around 1200 yrads this year on the ground.

 
Am I crazy for thinking that Mathieu probably deserves to win the Heisman? He's made so many game-changing plays this year that I think you can make a strong case for the guy.

 
Am I crazy for thinking that Mathieu probably deserves to win the Heisman? He's made so many game-changing plays this year that I think you can make a strong case for the guy.
You're not crazy, but he's got no shot. The only guy who gets less respect from the national media is M. Ball. How the heck is Ball not in the top 3 right now?
 
If you could build the prototype body frame for a RB, would it be Trent Richardson?

- 5'11" (maybe 5'10" is more perfect?)

- 224lbs (perfect)

But, beyond the usual height and weight, the most defining feature are his legs. His unusual bow-legged stance gives him a wide/low base and change of direction that I can't remember ever seeing in a runner with his ability. Couple the wide base with the 600-700lb squat ability and you have something that NFL defenders are going to fear for a while.

4.3 speed would be a nice added bonus, but with everything else in his arsenal I think 4.5 type speed will be just fine.

Can't wait to see him at the next level.
Agree with this post completely. With the bolded I too can't remember a prospect of this kind.
 
If you could build the prototype body frame for a RB, would it be Trent Richardson?

- 5'11" (maybe 5'10" is more perfect?)

- 224lbs (perfect)

But, beyond the usual height and weight, the most defining feature are his legs. His unusual bow-legged stance gives him a wide/low base and change of direction that I can't remember ever seeing in a runner with his ability. Couple the wide base with the 600-700lb squat ability and you have something that NFL defenders are going to fear for a while.

4.3 speed would be a nice added bonus, but with everything else in his arsenal I think 4.5 type speed will be just fine.

Can't wait to see him at the next level.
Is this just an observation or something thats known? Isn't ABradshaw's bow-legged running style what causes him to have all those feet problems?
 
LSU, Clemson, Wisconsin impress

Posted Dec. 05, 2011 @ 9:56 a.m. ET

By Nolan Nawrocki

For the second consecutive week, top-ranked LSU fell behind by double-digits in the first half and it easily could have been a three-TD deficit had it not been for four drops by Georgia receivers, including one in the endzone by Tavarres King, who was wide open after Tigers standout CB Morris Claiborne bit on a pump-fake and slipped to the ground.

Led by a dominant pass rush, the Tigers came roaring back, just as they did against Arkansas the week before, riding a spectacular performance from playmaking sophomore cover man Tyrann Matthieu, who returned a punt 62 yards for a score and nearly ran back another on a return where he seemed to avoid every defender on the field at least once.

Claiborne also recovered from his early misstep, jumping an ill-advised Aaron Murray flat pass and returning it 45 yards for a score as the Tigers went on to rattle off 42 unanswered points and end the Bulldogs' 10-game winning streak.

Clemson entered the ACC championship game reeling, having shown its immaturity in dropping three of four games. Star freshman WR Sammy Watkins, who missed part of that stretch of games, set the tone in the first quarter of the Tigers' 38-10 victory over Virginia Tech when he ran through overrated junior CB Jayron Hosley, who left the game with a stinger injury. His departure allowed Tech's secondary to be victimized downfield.

Hokies explosive junior RB David Wilson, who is fully expected to depart early for the draft after being named ACC Player of the Year, was stuck in neutral, held to a season-low 32 yards. He expressed his frustration after the game with play-calling that left him with six carries in the first half. He was outshined by Clemson's Andre Ellington, who has been slowed by injuries the past month, but appeared healthy and back in rare form, rushing 20 times for 125 yards and one TD.

The most dramatic championship game of the weekend came in the Big Ten's inaugural affair. A Kirk Cousins' Hail Mary pass gave Michigan State a last-second win the last time the Spartans faced Wisconsin, and playmaking WR Keshawn Martin nearly created more heroics when he returned a punt to the one-yard line with less than two minutes to play. Sophomore S Isaiah Lewis was blocked into the punter, however, and a running-into-the-punter penalty negated the return, allowing Wisconsin to preserve a 42-39 lead and earn its second consecutive trip to the Rose Bowl.

Wisconsin RB Montee Ball scored four TDs and is one away from Barry Sanders' NCAA single-season record of 39.

• Baylor senior RB Terrance Ganaway, the Big 12's leading rusher, broke the school's single-season rushing yardage and TD marks held by Jay Finley, whom he backed up last season. Ganaway started his career at Houston with Art Briles, then spent a year at Texarkana (Texas) College, where he did not play football, after his mother died of kidney cancer. The youngest of 11 children, Ganaway is credited for his maturity and quietly continues to shine in the shadow of junior standout QB Robert Griffin III, who threw the deep ball with precision in a 48-24 win over Texas.

• Georgia CB Brandon Boykin managed to recover a punt he muffed against LSU and appeared rattled by oncoming pressure. His explosive return ability is what could push him into the second round, but he must prove he can handle the ball.

• Southern Mississippi QB Austin Davis lacks ideal size, at a notch above 6-1 and 215 pounds, and his arm strength is merely adequate, but the four-year starter possesses an exceptional work ethic, competitiveness and on-field presence. The way he sparked the Golden Eagles to a surprising 49-28 win over previously unbeaten Houston in the Conference USA championship game could help convince evaluators he can handle a backup job in the NFL. Having already graduated and begun work on his MBA, his future looks brighter away from the field than on it at the next level, but he is the type of gritty performer that could will his way up the depth chart in the pros.

• Oklahoma State junior WR Justin Blackmon, who was widely expected to depart following his breakout third-year sophomore season last year, was introduced as part of the outgoing class on Senior Day in advance of the Cowboys' convincing 44-10 victory over rival Oklahoma, marking the first time that head coach Mike Gundy beat the Sooners in his time in Stillwater. OSU monster-sized DE Jamie Blatnick, who has elevated his stock to draftable status this season, returned a fumble 59 yards to the OU one-yard-line to set up a TD late in the first half. That opened the floodgates in what would become a defense-led rout.

• Oklahoma junior QB Landry Jones was too careless with the ball against Oklahoma State, tossing two interceptions and twice losing fumbles, including one that simply fell out of his hand as he was cocking it back to throw. Since he has been without his security blanket, Ryan Broyles, the past three games, Jones has not tossed a TD pass, nor played with confidence.
 
College stock watch: Badgers' Wilson comes up big

By Bucky Brooks NFL.com

Analyst

Each Monday throughout the college football season, NFL.com draft expert Bucky Brooks will share his notes and evaluations on potential NFL prospects for the 2012 draft and beyond.

Does size really matter?

That's the question evaluators must consider when assessing the pro prospects of Wisconsin quarterback Russell Wilson.

At 5-foot-10, 205 pounds, Wilson falls short of the height requirement in most draft rooms. His diminutive stature raises concerns about his ability to throw effectively from the pocket, with passer rushers typically measuring better than 6-foot-3. With the threat of turnovers coming off tips or deflections at the line, scouts are often reluctant to consider a "short" quarterback as a franchise player.

After watching Wilson shine in the Big Ten Championship Game, however, evaluators should reconsider their stringent standards at the position. While Wilson lacks some of the desired physical dimensions coveted by scouts, he is a polished passer with exceptional arm strength. From deep outs thrown from the opposite hash to go-routes tossed across the field off bootleg action, Wilson showcased his ability to make all of the requisite pro throws against Michigan State.

He also displayed exceptional accuracy and ball placement. He routinely delivered the ball on the receiver's body, while leading them away from defenders. His pinpoint placement enabled the Badgers' receivers to pick up yardage after the catch. Moreover, his accuracy resulted in several conversions on critical downs that allowed the Badgers to sustain drives.

In addition to showing superb placement, Wilson showed remarkable pocket poise and athleticism. He was unflappable when the pocket crumbled around him and his ability to buy time with his feet led to big plays on improvisation. In looking at several of the Badgers' biggest offensive plays, it was Wilson's elusiveness within the pocket that allowed him to shine. He repeatedly slipped out of tackles in the backfield to deliver laser-like strikes down the field. His combination of poise, presence and awareness is veteran-like, and scouts will certainly find his cool demeanor under duress encouraging.

Wilson did have some trouble against the Spartans' blitz. He was sacked three times and the harassment led to some errant throws from the pocket. He eventually overcame the steady barrage of rushers to regain his rhythm when the game was on the line, and his ability to defeat the blitz ultimately keyed the Badgers' win.

When scouts take Wilson's championship game performance into account with the consistent performance and production over the course of the season, it might lead some to overlook his substandard measurements when putting together their final assessment of his pro potential.

Cousins not bad, either

Teams looking for an underrated quarterback prospect with huge potential should closely examine Michigan State's Kirk Cousins. The flame-throwing Spartan has all the tools to develop into a solid starting quarterback as a pro.

At 6-2, 205, Cousins possesses the size to stand tall in the pocket against the rush. While he is not a superior athlete, he displays the movement skills and agility to avoid defenders in close proximity and make plays on the perimeter. He was effective executing bootlegs to either direction, and delivered those movement throws with outstanding zip and velocity.

The pace on his passes places him among the upper echelon of passers in college football, and he certainly has enough arm strength to make all of the requisite throws in a pro offense. He showcased his superior arm strength on a laser-like throw to B.J. Cunningham on a seam route. The velocity and zip on his throws allows him to squeeze balls into tight areas, which is the norm in the pro game.

Cousin complements his outstanding physical traits with a keen awareness of blitz and pressure. He anticipates rushers during the pre-snap process and possesses a quick release that allows him to get rid of the ball prior to rushers getting home. Part of that can be attributed to the Spartans' heavy usage of wide receiver screens, but Cousins also connected on a few slants or sight adjustments against the Badgers' rush. His ability to defeat his opponent with his throws is coveted by scouts and coaches.

In looking at weaknesses that stood out during his spectacular performance (22 of 30 passes for 281 yards with three touchdowns and one interception), I would point to his occasional tendency to lock onto his primary receiver. He fails to consistently move defenders with his eyes and they are able to get early jumps on his throws when he stares down the No.1 option in the route. This resulted in a costly interception on a seam pass in the second quarter. Although it didn't result in points for the Badgers, the turnover slowed down the rhythm of the Spartans' offense during the first half.

To his credit, Cousins bounced back from the disappointing throw by reeling off a series of pinpoint passes that sparked the Spartans to a breakout performance in the third quarter. He picked apart the Badgers' secondary with a variety of short and intermediate throws that stretched the coverage horizontally. With Cousins also taking a few shots down the field, the Spartans' offense displayed the kind of balance that puts defensive coordinators in a quandary.

Given the importance of having a quarterback with the ability to win with his arm, Cousins should draw plenty of interest from teams seeking a viable long-term solution at the right value.

The Heisman goes to…

If I had a Heisman vote, I would give it to LSU's Tyrann Mathieu. The sophomore defensive back is the most dominant player in college football and his exceptional playmaking ability has been the catalyst to the team's unbeaten season.

Mathieu has been a part of 13 turnovers (six forced fumbles, five fumble recoveries and two interceptions), while also registering 6.5 tackles for loss and 1.5 sacks. He has four return touchdowns (two fumble returns and two punt returns) and is arguably the most electrifying returner in the game.

Against Georgia in the SEC Championship Game, his 62-yard punt return score changed the momentum of the game. He slipped and dodged multiple tacklers on the way to the end zone, and his spectacular run was part of a sensational effort that saw him amass 119 yards on four returns. Most importantly, it was his second return touchdown in the past two weeks and showcased his remarkable ability to deliver with the game hanging in the balance.

From a defensive standpoint, he is the game-changer that routinely delivers the pivotal play for the Tigers. His uncanny ability to get his hands on the ball is reminiscent of the last defensive player to win the award -- Charles Woodson. If not for a regrettable off-field incident that led to a one-game suspension, Mathieu's play would certainly have thrust him into the discussion among voters for the distinguished honor.

Andrew Luck, Robert Griffin III, Trent Richardson and Case Keenum have made strong cases for winning college football's highest individual honor, but my vote would go to the best football player on college football's top team.

Word on the street

The wide receiver generating the most buzz in scouting circles is Baylor's Kendall Wright. According to an NFC West personnel executive, he might be the most explosive receiver in the draft and he ranks as the third- or fourth-best prospect at the position when you factor in potential underclassmen. If he tests as well as anticipated in spring workouts, he has a strong chance to jump into the bottom of the first round by draft day.

The small school standout with the biggest chance to shoot up the charts in the run up to the draft could be Amini Silatolu of Midwestern (Tex.) State. In speaking with an NFC East scout, the 6-3, 312-pound guard is a dominant player on the Division II level who compares to 49ers' guard Mike Iupati. Although his raw technical skills and level of competition rank as concerns, his combination of size, strength and toughness makes him an intriguing prospect. If he shows well in postseason all-star games, he could surge up draft boards across the league.
 
Week 14 Rewind: Weeden, Boykin, Keenum leave questions

By Rob Rang | The Sports Xchange/CBSSports.com

Each week, we rewind the game film to highlight the star-worthy performances that could impact the 2012 draft rankings:

• Just as the nation seemed to be coming to grips with the idea of an LSU-Alabama rematch in the BCS Championship game, an overwhelming effort by No. 3 Oklahoma State -- destroying rival Oklahoma Saturday night -- again embroiled the bowl selection process in controversy.

What won't be controversial is the NFL draft stock of Oklahoma State quarterback Brandon Weeden -- at least not in the eyes of scouts. Considering his gaudy statistics and winning ways, Weeden's draft ranking could be met with some surprise from fans.

With 217 yards against the Sooners, Weeden broke his own school record for most passing yards in a season, throwing for 4,328 yards through the air in 2011, beating the mark he set last year (4,277). For the first time in 24 games, Weeden did not throw a touchdown pass.

In rushing for a season-high 278 yards and four touchdowns, Oklahoma State didn't need him to attack the Sooners through the air. That isn't to say Weeden wasn't able to demonstrate the traits that endear him to scouts.

Yet, the concerns scouts have about the Cowboys' quarterback were just as clear.

At 6-4, 218 pounds, Weeden has the size scouts like at the position. He also boasts a strong and generally accurate arm, the recognition to pick apart defenses and the presence to step into an NFL locker room and earn respect quickly.

The Cowboys thoroughly dominated the Sooners at the line of scrimmage in this 106th running of the Bedlam rivalry. OSU averaged 8.4 yards per carry and didn't surrender a sack. In fact, the only time Weeden needed to move his feet was on designed deception plays like screens or designed rollouts. This greatly exaggerates Weeden's accuracy and likelihood of success in the NFL.

As with most quarterbacks at this high level, if allowed to become comfortable in the pocket, Weeden can slice apart a defense with surgical precision. Due to the spread attack Oklahoma State employs, Weeden is rarely pressured. When he's not taking snaps out of the shotgun, he's typically in the Pistol. He's been sacked just 11 times in 12 games this season.

That, of course, won't continue in the NFL. As with most spread quarterbacks, Weeden has obvious issues in a muddled pocket. He doesn't reset his feet well and lacks the athleticism to buy time inside or out of the pocket. When asked to roll out -- a staple of most pro-style systems -- Weeden loses accuracy, sailing passes in the direction he's running. This was the case when he overthrew receiver Tracy Moore on the right sideline to end the Cowboys' first drive of the second quarter.

Perhaps most importantly, having spent years in the New York Yankees' farm system as a pitcher, Weeden is significantly older than virtually all NFL prospects at 28 years old, which while less of a factor at the quarterback position than perhaps any other position, is important, nonetheless. Teams are leery of using high draft picks on players who physically may be at or beyond their peak, especially those who are going to be asked to demonstrate more athleticism in the NFL.

NFL teams operating out of a primarily shotgun attack -- the Saints, Patriots, Packers and Colts chief among them -- value Weeden's quick delivery and strong, accurate right arm. For teams that ask their quarterbacks to do more than simply collect shotgun snaps and fire away, however, Weeden may generate just middle or even late-round interest.

• The Stanford Cardinal may have given the country a game plan in how to beat Virginia Tech in last year's Orange Bowl. It is much easier said than done, of course, but the Hokies proved to be susceptible to a power running attack which, as their defense is drawn to the line, further softens coverage from their safeties. A team can attack over the top, especially if it has a seam-splitting receiver in the slot or at tight end.

This is the game plan Clemson used to record a second victory over Virginia Tech this season. Though he only caught two passes, Tigers' tight end Dwayne Allen could have earned MVP honors for this game due to his all-around performance that resulted in two scores of his own and some key blocks from multiple positions.

Allen, a 6-4, 255-pound junior, scored Clemson's first touchdown, taking a short pass up the left sideline around and through the Virginia Tech defense, showing an impressive combination of agility, acceleration and power. His second touchdown came from just 8 yards out, but demonstrated different skills -- the burst to get a clean release off the line, sell the quick post to get Hokie safety Detrick Bonner turned away and the soft hands and body control to make the diving reception to his right. The second score gave Clemson a 17-10 lead on its first drive of the second half.

Quite frankly, Allen's two touchdowns were as easy as any he's caught all season. It was the versatility he showed throughout the rest of the game that will catch the attention of scouts.

Allen has the size and strength to hold up nicely as an in-line blocker. While he's not a dominator, Allen showed good initial quickness to get upfield, turn and seal the Hokies' defensive end off from the play, creating outside running lanes for Clemson's speedy Andre Ellington to get to the flanks. Serving as a testament to Allen's athleticism and reliability, he was moved to H-back on occasion to confuse the Virginia Tech defense and even to fullback when Clemson changed to a jumbo, three-tight end package.

Teams looking for a difference-making tight end capable of stretching defenses deep may want to look elsewhere because Allen does not boast elite athleticism. In terms of blocking and being a security blanket underneath, however, Allen staked a claim as the best all-around tight end in the country.

• While Oklahoma State was doing its best to convince voters it deserved a shot at the BCS championship game, No. 1 LSU just kept steamrolling opponents, including Georgia's multi-talented senior cornerback and return man Brandon Boykin during Saturday's SEC championship game.

Having returned four kickoffs for touchdowns in his career, the Tigers certainly were aware of Boykin's reputation as a game-breaker. Despite this reputation, a sterling effort from the LSU special teams bottled up the 5-10, 183-pound senior. Boykin returned three kicks for a just 49 yards and was held without a gained yard after fielding four punts. Even worse, twice Boykin bobbled returns.

While his special teams' prowess was managed by LSU, Boykin, at times, flashed the closing speed and tenacity in coverage to pique the interest of pro scouts. Twice Boykin closed in front of LSU receivers to bat away passes, knocking away a deep ball intended for Rueben Randle on the second play from scrimmage and slipping past Odell Beckham to knock away another well-thrown pass just a drive later.

As impressive as Boykin's coverage skills were Saturday, his unwillingness to take on ball carriers proved to be one of the key reasons LSU rattled off 42 unanswered points to blow out Georgia. Boykin, who infamously gave little effort to slow down South Carolina defensive end Melvin Ingram on his way to a stunning 68-yard fake punt for a touchdown on Sept. 10, again demonstrated his fickle competitiveness against the Tigers.

As LSU was pulling away, Georgia needed its seniors to step up and make a play. Instead, the senior cornerback twice backed down from physical confrontations against bigger ball carriers. LSU tailback Kenny Hilliard blew past Boykin for a rushing score in the second quarter. Boykin's unwillingness to sacrifice his body for the good of the team was even more obvious later in the game when he was unable to slow down Hilliard after the freshman running back caught a quick swing pass in the right flat.

Hilliard had just Boykin between himself and the end zone and made short work of the diminutive corner, scoring his third touchdown of the game and leaving a bad taste in the mouth of any scout considering Boykin as a potential top-75 prospect in next April's draft.

• Upon Further Review highlights a player whose performance over the weekend significantly altered my earlier assessment.

Houston quarterback Case Keenum entered the weekend a growing Heisman candidate and the leader of a Cougars' team hoping to land a BCS bowl game. Due to his hype, some believed he was gaining traction as a middle-round NFL prospect.

Instead, a swarming Southern Miss defense proved that Keenum, while a wonderful story, is significantly flawed as a pro prospect.

Keenum's lofty statistics (he's the all-time FBS passing leader with 18,865 passing yards) belie the fact that he's rarely asked to make NFL throws in Houston's spread offense. He's also been the beneficiary of weak competition. Keenum only faced one defense all season ranked among the country's top 50 in pass defense. Southern Miss, which held Keenum to "just" 373 yards and two touchdowns along with two interceptions, was ranked 55th heading into the Conference USA championship.

Against Southern Miss, Houston attempted to attack the field just as it had all year with a never-ending barrage of the quick screens and crossing routes popular in the spread attack. Keenum racked up his yardage on a season-high 67 attempts, rarely completing passes traveling more than 10 yards downfield. In fairness, Keenum did throw some beautiful passes in the loss.

A deep ball that Patrick Edwards dropped in the first quarter couldn't have been thrown with better accuracy. When he feels comfortable in the pocket, Keenum can throw the ball with nice touch.

The problem is, even when Keenum is throwing the ball accurately, his passes lack the sizzle to get through an NFL secondary unimpeded.

Southern Miss physically challenged Houston's receivers, often forcing them outside. Because he possesses only average arm strength, Keenum struggled to drive passes to the sidelines, effectively limiting where Houston could successfully attack the field.

Keenum ascension as the most successful quarterback in FBS history is a heart-warming story. Scouts with whom I've spoken throughout the season agree that Keenum is short on the NFL traits needed to give him a draftable grade.
 
If you could build the prototype body frame for a RB, would it be Trent Richardson?

- 5'11" (maybe 5'10" is more perfect?)

- 224lbs (perfect)

But, beyond the usual height and weight, the most defining feature are his legs. His unusual bow-legged stance gives him a wide/low base and change of direction that I can't remember ever seeing in a runner with his ability. Couple the wide base with the 600-700lb squat ability and you have something that NFL defenders are going to fear for a while.

4.3 speed would be a nice added bonus, but with everything else in his arsenal I think 4.5 type speed will be just fine.

Can't wait to see him at the next level.
Is this just an observation or something thats known? Isn't ABradshaw's bow-legged running style what causes him to have all those feet problems?
I think it's clear as day for anyone to see Richardson's bow-leggedness when you watch video of him run and slow it down and in photos. But I don't think you can conclude that it will cause him foot problems as it has Bradshaw. I'm more apt to believe Bradshaw's foot problems can be attributed to how hard he plants and cuts in addition to playing on artificial turf at home.When I look at Richardson run, he's actually pretty smooth for a "power back" and has the vision and cutting ability to be a "finesse" runner. He's got what I'd call "soft feet".

 
2012 NFL Draft Prospects: Quarterbacks

The top 2012 quarterback prospects available for the 2012 NFL Draft. * - denotes 2013 prospect. ** - denotes 2014 prospect.

This page was last updated December 5, 2011.

By Charlie Campbell.

1. Andrew Luck*, QB, Stanford

Height: 6-4. Weight: 235.

Projected 40 Time: 4.77.

Projected Round (2012): First Overall Pick.

12/5/11: Luck has had an excellent season, completing 70 percent of his passes for 3,170 yards with 35 touchdowns and nine interceptions. Three of his interceptions came on tipped passes. He has shown good mobility this season and is very accurate throwing on the run. The cerebral signal caller has taken over a lot of the play calling for Stanford, and makes them from the entire playbook, not just a choice among three or four plays. Few pro quarterbacks are able to do that, or are even trusted to do it. Luck also made a one-handed 13-yard catch this season. He looks like a lock to be the first overall pick next April.

(more info in the linked page)

2. Matt Barkley*, USC

Height: 6-2. Weight: 230.

Projected 40 Time: 4.83.

Projected Round (2012): Top 10 Pick.

12/5/11: Barkley had a great season for the Trojans. He set numerous passing records including two games where he threw six touchdowns. For the season, Barkley completed 69 percent of his passes for 3,528 yards with 39 touchdowns and seven interceptions. He really improved his decision making and is playing smart football. This season, the junior was extremely accurate in throwing the ball to all parts of the field: short, intermediate, and deep passes. Barkley comes from a pro offense and looks like a safe pick.

(more info in the linked page)

3. Robert Griffin*, III QB, Baylor

Height: 6-2. Weight: 220.

Projected 40 Time: 4.52.

Projected Round (2012): Top 15.

12/5/11: Griffin has been one of the biggest stars in college football this season. He carried Baylor to thrilling wins over Oklahoma, Kansas and TCU. Griffin has displayed a strong arm, with good mobility and is very accurate on passes downfield. His accuracy has been phenomenal on passes to the short, intermediate, and deep part of the field. He is extremely intelligent off the field and that translates to good decision-making on the field. Thus far in 2011, Griffin has completed 73 percent of his passes for 3,678 yards with 34 touchdowns and five interceptions. He has also rushed for 612 yards and seven touchdowns.

The early hints are that Griffin is inclined to pull an Andrew Luck/Jake Locker/Matt Leinart and return to school for another season. However, a recent concussion might force him to reconsider given the injury risk of returning to Baylor.

(more info in the linked page)

4. Landry "Lance" Jones*, QB, Oklahoma

Height: 6-4. Weight: 216.

Projected 40 Time: 4.81.

Projected Round (2012): Top 20 Pick.

12/5/11: Jones has led Oklahoma to some big wins and huge offensive days this season, but the Sooners have had a somewhat disappointing season. For the season, the junior has completed 64 percent of his passes for 4,052 yards with 28 touchdowns and 12 interceptions. He has shown the big-armed pocket presence to be a potential franchise quarterback at the next level.

Jones was outplayed by Griffin in their head-to-head matchup. The game against Baylor brings into question if Jones lacks the 'it' factor to push his team to a win. He has lost some touchdown throws due to Oklahoma putting in backup quarterback Blake Bell to run the ball into the end zone.

(more info in the linked page)

5. Ryan Tannehill, QB, Texas A&M

Height: 6-4. Weight: 219.

Projected 40 Time: 4.61.

Projected Round (2012): 2-3.

12/5/11: Tannehill has had some massive games in 2011. He also has had some bad performances in the second half of games that contributed to the Aggies blowing big leads and losing big games to Oklahoma State and Arkansas. Tannehill threw three interceptions per game against the Cowboys, the Sooners and the Longhorns. For the season, he has completed 61 percent of his passes for 3,415 yards with 28 touchdowns and 14 interceptions. Tannehill has run for 296 yards and four scores. He has a strong arm with the potential to grow into an accurate passer. The senior also has excellent mobility.

Tannehill still needs to make up for a lot of lost time to learn the mental necessities of the position. Others rate him higher, but he will enter the NFL with only 20 collegiate starts at quarterback. Tannehill has a special skill set, but he is going to need a lot of grooming at the NFL level. However, the unknown of if Tannehill can handle it, pushes up the riskiness of picking him. That could cause Tannehill to be a second-day pick.

(more info in the linked page)

6. Nick Foles, Arizona

Height: 6-5. Weight: 235.

Projected 40 Time: 5.01.

Projected Round (2012): 3-4.

12/5/11: Foles was a warrior this season as he had to carry his team to keep them competitive in games. Arizona's defense was terrible, and Foles had the pressure of having to get into shootouts on a weekly basis. He completed 69 percent of his passes for 4,334 yards with 28 touchdowns and 14 interceptions. Foles is a big-armed pocket passer. Early in the season, he was doing a good job of avoiding turnovers but late in the season he threw a bunch of interceptions. One of the reasons for the interceptions is his inclination to lock onto one receiver and not make progressions through his different reads. Foles' field vision will need work and that is the big detriment to his game.

(more info in the linked page)

7. Geno Smith*, West Virginia

Height: 6-3. Weight: 214.

Projected 40 Time: 4.69.

Projected Round (2012): 3-4.

12/5/11: Smith had an excellent season for the Mountaineers. The junior has completed 65 percent of his passes for 3,741 yards with 25 touchdowns and five interceptions. He also ran for 448 yards and one touchdown. Smith played his heart out against LSU's talented defense with 463 yards passing. He shows the arm to be quality passer. Smith is somewhat raw and should probably return for his senior season to improve before entering the draft.

8. E.J. Manuel*, QB, Florida State

Height: 6-5. Weight: 234.

Projected 40 Time: 4.61.

Projected Round (2012): 3-4.

12/5/11: Manuel hasn't taken the big leap forward that many thought he would. Manuel went down with an injury against Oklahoma and missed the next game against Clemson. For the season, he has completed 65 percent of his passes for 2,417 yards with 16 touchdowns and eight interceptions, plus has run for 132 yards and two touchdowns. Manuel has tons of physical tools with huge upside. He should return for his senior season.

(More info on the linked page)



9. Kirk Cousins, Michigan State

Height: 6-3. Weight: 202.

Projected 40 Time: 4.85.

Projected Round (2012): 3-5.

12/5/11: Cousins displays good potential but is held back by an offense that aims to keep the ball on the ground, plus he doesn't have a good supporting cast of receiving weapons. Against a good Nebraska defense, Cousins struggled. For the season, he has completed 64 percent of his passes for 2,735 yards with 21 touchdowns and six interceptions.

(more info on the linked page)

10. Brandon Weeden, QB, Oklahoma State

Height: 6-4. Weight: 220.

Projected 40 Time: 4.90.

Projected Round (2012): 4-5.

12/5/11: Weeden has completed 73 percent of his passes for 4,111 yards for 34 touchdowns and 12 interceptions. He had a massive game in leading a furious comeback win over Texas A&M. Weeden had a rough game against Iowa State in an upset loss that put Oklahoma State's National Title Game hopes on life support. Throughout the season, he has displayed a strong, accurate arm and is a good pocket passer. If Weeden were six or seven years younger, he would be ranked at the very least on the second day of the draft.

(more info on the linked page)

11. Kellen Moore, Boise State

Height: 6-0. Weight: 187.

Projected 40 Time: 4.93.

Projected Round (2012): 4-5.

12/5/11: Moore has put up some big numbers in leading Boise State's potent offense. He completed 73 percent of his passes for 3,194 yards with 38 touchdowns and seven interceptions. The size issues are Moore's biggest obstacle.

(more info on the linked page)

12. Case Keenum, QB, Houston

Height: 6-1. Weight: 210.

Projected 40 Time: 4.83.

Projected Round (2011): 4-5.

12/5/11: Keenum set all kinds of NCAA records with a massive senior season. He completed 73 percent of his passes for 4,726 yards with 43 touchdowns and three interceptions. Keenum looks like a system quarterback who needs to do well at the Senior Bowl to show he can be more than that.

(more info on the linked page)
Additional QB prospects also on the linked page

 
'Faust said:
2012 NFL Draft Prospects: Quarterbacks

The top 2012 quarterback prospects available for the 2012 NFL Draft. * - denotes 2013 prospect. ** - denotes 2014 prospect.

This page was last updated December 5, 2011.

By Charlie Campbell.

1. Andrew Luck*, QB, Stanford

Height: 6-4. Weight: 235.

Projected 40 Time: 4.77.

Projected Round (2012): First Overall Pick.

12/5/11: Luck has had an excellent season, completing 70 percent of his passes for 3,170 yards with 35 touchdowns and nine interceptions. Three of his interceptions came on tipped passes. He has shown good mobility this season and is very accurate throwing on the run. The cerebral signal caller has taken over a lot of the play calling for Stanford, and makes them from the entire playbook, not just a choice among three or four plays. Few pro quarterbacks are able to do that, or are even trusted to do it. Luck also made a one-handed 13-yard catch this season. He looks like a lock to be the first overall pick next April.

(more info in the linked page)

2. Matt Barkley*, USC

Height: 6-2. Weight: 230.

Projected 40 Time: 4.83.

Projected Round (2012): Top 10 Pick.

12/5/11: Barkley had a great season for the Trojans. He set numerous passing records including two games where he threw six touchdowns. For the season, Barkley completed 69 percent of his passes for 3,528 yards with 39 touchdowns and seven interceptions. He really improved his decision making and is playing smart football. This season, the junior was extremely accurate in throwing the ball to all parts of the field: short, intermediate, and deep passes. Barkley comes from a pro offense and looks like a safe pick.

(more info in the linked page)

3. Robert Griffin*, III QB, Baylor

Height: 6-2. Weight: 220.

Projected 40 Time: 4.52.

Projected Round (2012): Top 15.

12/5/11: Griffin has been one of the biggest stars in college football this season. He carried Baylor to thrilling wins over Oklahoma, Kansas and TCU. Griffin has displayed a strong arm, with good mobility and is very accurate on passes downfield. His accuracy has been phenomenal on passes to the short, intermediate, and deep part of the field. He is extremely intelligent off the field and that translates to good decision-making on the field. Thus far in 2011, Griffin has completed 73 percent of his passes for 3,678 yards with 34 touchdowns and five interceptions. He has also rushed for 612 yards and seven touchdowns.

The early hints are that Griffin is inclined to pull an Andrew Luck/Jake Locker/Matt Leinart and return to school for another season. However, a recent concussion might force him to reconsider given the injury risk of returning to Baylor.

(more info in the linked page)

4. Landry "Lance" Jones*, QB, Oklahoma

Height: 6-4. Weight: 216.

Projected 40 Time: 4.81.

Projected Round (2012): Top 20 Pick.

12/5/11: Jones has led Oklahoma to some big wins and huge offensive days this season, but the Sooners have had a somewhat disappointing season. For the season, the junior has completed 64 percent of his passes for 4,052 yards with 28 touchdowns and 12 interceptions. He has shown the big-armed pocket presence to be a potential franchise quarterback at the next level.

Jones was outplayed by Griffin in their head-to-head matchup. The game against Baylor brings into question if Jones lacks the 'it' factor to push his team to a win. He has lost some touchdown throws due to Oklahoma putting in backup quarterback Blake Bell to run the ball into the end zone.

(more info in the linked page)

5. Ryan Tannehill, QB, Texas A&M

Height: 6-4. Weight: 219.

Projected 40 Time: 4.61.

Projected Round (2012): 2-3.

12/5/11: Tannehill has had some massive games in 2011. He also has had some bad performances in the second half of games that contributed to the Aggies blowing big leads and losing big games to Oklahoma State and Arkansas. Tannehill threw three interceptions per game against the Cowboys, the Sooners and the Longhorns. For the season, he has completed 61 percent of his passes for 3,415 yards with 28 touchdowns and 14 interceptions. Tannehill has run for 296 yards and four scores. He has a strong arm with the potential to grow into an accurate passer. The senior also has excellent mobility.

Tannehill still needs to make up for a lot of lost time to learn the mental necessities of the position. Others rate him higher, but he will enter the NFL with only 20 collegiate starts at quarterback. Tannehill has a special skill set, but he is going to need a lot of grooming at the NFL level. However, the unknown of if Tannehill can handle it, pushes up the riskiness of picking him. That could cause Tannehill to be a second-day pick.

(more info in the linked page)

6. Nick Foles, Arizona

Height: 6-5. Weight: 235.

Projected 40 Time: 5.01.

Projected Round (2012): 3-4.

12/5/11: Foles was a warrior this season as he had to carry his team to keep them competitive in games. Arizona's defense was terrible, and Foles had the pressure of having to get into shootouts on a weekly basis. He completed 69 percent of his passes for 4,334 yards with 28 touchdowns and 14 interceptions. Foles is a big-armed pocket passer. Early in the season, he was doing a good job of avoiding turnovers but late in the season he threw a bunch of interceptions. One of the reasons for the interceptions is his inclination to lock onto one receiver and not make progressions through his different reads. Foles' field vision will need work and that is the big detriment to his game.

(more info in the linked page)

7. Geno Smith*, West Virginia

Height: 6-3. Weight: 214.

Projected 40 Time: 4.69.

Projected Round (2012): 3-4.

12/5/11: Smith had an excellent season for the Mountaineers. The junior has completed 65 percent of his passes for 3,741 yards with 25 touchdowns and five interceptions. He also ran for 448 yards and one touchdown. Smith played his heart out against LSU's talented defense with 463 yards passing. He shows the arm to be quality passer. Smith is somewhat raw and should probably return for his senior season to improve before entering the draft.

8. E.J. Manuel*, QB, Florida State

Height: 6-5. Weight: 234.

Projected 40 Time: 4.61.

Projected Round (2012): 3-4.

12/5/11: Manuel hasn't taken the big leap forward that many thought he would. Manuel went down with an injury against Oklahoma and missed the next game against Clemson. For the season, he has completed 65 percent of his passes for 2,417 yards with 16 touchdowns and eight interceptions, plus has run for 132 yards and two touchdowns. Manuel has tons of physical tools with huge upside. He should return for his senior season.

(More info on the linked page)



9. Kirk Cousins, Michigan State

Height: 6-3. Weight: 202.

Projected 40 Time: 4.85.

Projected Round (2012): 3-5.

12/5/11: Cousins displays good potential but is held back by an offense that aims to keep the ball on the ground, plus he doesn't have a good supporting cast of receiving weapons. Against a good Nebraska defense, Cousins struggled. For the season, he has completed 64 percent of his passes for 2,735 yards with 21 touchdowns and six interceptions.

(more info on the linked page)

10. Brandon Weeden, QB, Oklahoma State

Height: 6-4. Weight: 220.

Projected 40 Time: 4.90.

Projected Round (2012): 4-5.

12/5/11: Weeden has completed 73 percent of his passes for 4,111 yards for 34 touchdowns and 12 interceptions. He had a massive game in leading a furious comeback win over Texas A&M. Weeden had a rough game against Iowa State in an upset loss that put Oklahoma State's National Title Game hopes on life support. Throughout the season, he has displayed a strong, accurate arm and is a good pocket passer. If Weeden were six or seven years younger, he would be ranked at the very least on the second day of the draft.

(more info on the linked page)

11. Kellen Moore, Boise State

Height: 6-0. Weight: 187.

Projected 40 Time: 4.93.

Projected Round (2012): 4-5.

12/5/11: Moore has put up some big numbers in leading Boise State's potent offense. He completed 73 percent of his passes for 3,194 yards with 38 touchdowns and seven interceptions. The size issues are Moore's biggest obstacle.

(more info on the linked page)

12. Case Keenum, QB, Houston

Height: 6-1. Weight: 210.

Projected 40 Time: 4.83.

Projected Round (2011): 4-5.

12/5/11: Keenum set all kinds of NCAA records with a massive senior season. He completed 73 percent of his passes for 4,726 yards with 43 touchdowns and three interceptions. Keenum looks like a system quarterback who needs to do well at the Senior Bowl to show he can be more than that.

(more info on the linked page)
Additional QB prospects also on the linked page
I find it interesting how little Tyler Wilson is being talked about. I wish I could remember where I saw the quote, but one scout was quoted as saying that there are 4 franchise QBs in this draft, Luck, RG III, Barkley and Tyler Wilson. Wilson isn't even in the top 12 here. I know he is not a lock to declare, but none of the underclassmen are at this stage.
 
The VaTech v. Michigan bowl game will be a good matchup of RB's. I really like David Wilson and think he has the potential to be a very good pro RB. For Michigan, Fitz Toussaint is only a sophomore, but I think he has an NFL future as well, provided he can continue to stay healthy.

 
1. Justin Blackmon*, Oklahoma State WR (6-1, 215): The most explosive receiver in college football has a game that is eerily similar to Terrell Owens'. His combination of size, strength and athleticism overwhelms defenders, and his penchant for playmaking makes him a potential anchor for a sophisticated passing game. Throw in the fact that Oklahoma State's coaches frequently have suggested Blackmon's skills are more advanced than Dez Bryant's at a similar stage, it's easy to place Blackmon at the top of the list.2. Michael Floyd, Notre Dame, WR (6-3, 224): Floyd might rank as the best pass catcher in college football since Larry Fitzgerald. He displays unbelievable ball skills and has a knack for making the acrobatic catch look routine. Although there are questions about his top-end speed, he rarely is tracked from behind in the open field and plays with reckless abandon with the ball in his hands. If he is able to properly address his character issues, Floyd might make the race for the No. 1 spot closer than anyone anticipates.3. Kendall Wright, Baylor, WR (5-10, 190): Wright has scouts drooling over his extraordinary combination of speed, athleticism and burst. He routinely blows past defenders on vertical routes but also flashes the ability to wreak havoc on "catch-and-run" plays on the outside. While he still remains unpolished as a route runner, the potential for Wright to make a Mike Wallace-like impact on the NFL has sent his stock soaring in war rooms across the league.4. Alshon Jeffrey*, South Carolina, WR (6-4, 229): Jeffrey is a jump ball specialist with the size and athleticism that scouts covet in a No. 1 receiver. He excels at coming down with contested balls in traffic and is an indefensible target in the red area. Although he remains unrefined as a route runner and lacks top end speed, Jeffrey's size, strength and movement skills could prompt a team to envision him blossoming into a Plaxico Burress-type playmaker in the passing game.5. Dwayne Allen*, Clemson, TE (6-4, 255): Scouts looking for the next tight end capable of creating mismatches should closely examine Allen's game. He displays the speed and athleticism to run away from linebackers, while possessing the size and strength to overpower defenders in tight quarters. The combination of skills makes him impossible to guard in passing situations, a quality that makes him a coveted prospect in many war rooms across the league. He could be the next hybrid tight end to take the league by storm.6. Orson Charles*, Georgia, TE (6-3, 242): Charles has all of the physical tools to become a matchup nightmare as a pro. He runs like a receiver but has the size and strength to maul small defenders in isolated matchups. He is capable of stretching the field down the middle, while also acting as the primary target between the hashes. Although he must continue to develop as a blocker, his ability to impact the passing game as a vertical threat makes him a hot commodity in draft rooms.7. Nick Toon, Wisconsin, WR (6-2, 220): Toon has been a bit of a disappointment this season, but his combination of size, strength and ball skills entices scouts. He flashes the ability to make plays between the hashes, while also acting as a sneaky deep threat in the Badgers' passing game. Toon has struggled gaining separation from defenders in tight coverage, but he could improve in that area with more reps and experience. With more teams looking for big, physical receivers to anchor their passing games, Toon's value remains high throughout the league.8. Coby Fleener, Stanford, TE (6-6, 245): It's hard to find a tight end prospect with experience playing from a traditional alignment, but Fleener has been well groomed from his time at Stanford. He thrived in the Pac-12 running pro-style routes over the middle of the field, but he also acted as the Cardinal's lone deep threat the past two seasons. He led FBS with 10 touchdown receptions and posted an impressive 20.3 yards per catch average that is uncommon for the position. In addition, he displayed a gritty disposition as a blocker that makes it easy to envision him blossoming into an every down player as a pro. With few tight ends rivaling his overall game, it is quite possible that Fleener emerges as the top tight end on this list by draft day.9. Dwight Jones, North Carolina, WR (6-4, 225): From a production standpoint, it is hard to dispute Jones' inclusion on this list after scoring 11 touchdowns and surpassing the 1,000-yard mark in 2011. He has the combination of size, speed and athleticism to emerge as a No. 1 receiver as a pro, and scouts are excited about his dramatic improvement as a senior. If he can continue to dazzle during the college all-star game circuit, Jones might climb higher on charts around the league.10. Tommy Streeter*, Miami, WR, (6-5, 215): Streeter might be a surprising inclusion on this list, but a close look at his game reveals a big, athletic playmaker with speed to burn. He excels at blowing past defenders on vertical routes and is also a crafty route over the middle. His size and athleticism makes an ideal target as a potential No. 1 receiver. He needs to display better consistency with his hands(*Denotes underclassmen)1. Trent Richardson*, Alabama, RB (5-11, 224): Talented runner with a pro-ready game, Richardson excels at grinding out tough yardage between the tackles, while also providing explosive plays on perimeter runs. Richardson is also regarded as an exceptional receiver, which makes him an ideal feature back. With several evaluators viewing Richardson as a better prospect than his predecessor (Mark Ingram), he is the undisputed choice as the top runner in college football.2. David Wilson*, Virginia Tech, RB (5-10, 205): Wilson is an explosive playmaker built in the mold of Ray Rice. He possesses the speed and quickness to scare defenders in space, but is also rugged enough to effectively run in tight quarters. Although his size leads to questions about his ability to carry the load, the fact that he finished 2011 with nine games with 20-plus carries suggests he is more than capable of being a workhorse.3. Lamar Miller*, Miami (Fla.), RB (5-11, 212): Miller is a smooth runner with deceptive speed and quickness. He displays exceptional vision and awareness finding creases on the backside, and his surprising toughness on inside runs draws comparisons to former Hurricane Clinton Portis. While his dramatic drop in production during the final half of the season (only two 100-yard rushing games over final seven weeks) leads to questions about his ability to handle a heavy workload, his superior talent will make him hard to bypass as a potential franchise back.4. LaMichael James*, Oregon, RB (5-9, 195): James is the dynamic playmaker that most offensive coordinators covet as a change-of-pace back in the backfield. He possesses a combination of speed, quickness and agility that makes him a threat to score from anywhere on the field. He shines as a runner/receiver in the Ducks' spread system. While there are certainly questions about whether James' remarkable production is a byproduct of playing in a wide-open scheme, he has potential to thrive as a Darren Sproles-like weapon for a creative playcaller.5. Chris Polk*, Washington, RB (5-11, 222): As a hard-nosed runner with a crafty running style, Polk is one of college football's best runners between the tackles. He bounces through traffic and consistently finds a way to get to the second level. While he lacks elite speed, his combination of footwork and power allows him to thrive within the 15-yard box, which is key to being a productive pro runner.6. Bernard Pierce*, Temple, RB (6-0, 218): After spearheading the Owls' resurgence with his hard-nosed running style and robust production, Pierce is unquestionably one of the top workhorses in college football. He is at his best grinding between the tackles on a series of power runs, but also flashes the burst to get around the corner. Although the inferior level of competition he has faced might factor into the equation when assessing his ability, Pierce is a legitimate runner.7. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati, RB (5-10, 200): Pead is an explosive jitterbug with the speed and quickness to be an effective change of pace back as a pro. He attacks the line of scrimmage with a burst, but also possesses the balance and body control to run through tackles at the second level. His dangerous open-field running skills also make him an effective playmaker in the passing game. Pead routinely turns screens into big plays, and his versatility will make him a coveted prospect in several war rooms across the league.8. Cyrus Gray, Texas A&M, RB (5-10, 212): Gray is a blue-collar runner with vision, quickness and cutback skills. His decisive, "one-cut" running style leads to few negative runs and is ideally suited to the zone-based scheme predominantly used in the pro game. He might lack the big-play potential of others on this list, but his combination of athleticism and toughness makes him an enticing prospect for teams looking for an undervalued player.9. Montee Ball, Wisconsin, RB (5-11, 212): Ball is the most productive runner in college football with 32 rushing touchdowns in 275 carries. His penchant for finding the paint is admirable, but scouts are more concerned with his ability to elude and avoid defenders in traffic. He doesn't appear to possess elite speed or quickness, and the Badgers' talented offensive line routinely springs him to the second level unimpeded. Ball is certainly talented, but he lacks some of the blue-chip traits of his counterparts.10. Doug Martin, Boise State, RB (5-9, 210): Martin isn't as flashy as some runners on this list, but his game is built for the pros. He is a rugged inside runner with underrated power, and he has a knack for falling forward at the end of runs. His ability to finish is one of his biggest traits, and coaches will appreciate his steady game as a finisher in a four-minute situation. Martin isn't a workhorse runner to build an offense around, but he is a solid complementary player as part of a rotation.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d824dcc62/article/top-10-wrtes-osus-blackmon-headlines-explosive-group
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1. Justin Blackmon*, Oklahoma State WR (6-1, 215): The most explosive receiver in college football has a game that is eerily similar to Terrell Owens'. His combination of size, strength and athleticism overwhelms defenders, and his penchant for playmaking makes him a potential anchor for a sophisticated passing game. Throw in the fact that Oklahoma State's coaches frequently have suggested Blackmon's skills are more advanced than Dez Bryant's at a similar stage, it's easy to place Blackmon at the top of the list.2. Michael Floyd, Notre Dame, WR (6-3, 224): Floyd might rank as the best pass catcher in college football since Larry Fitzgerald. He displays unbelievable ball skills and has a knack for making the acrobatic catch look routine. Although there are questions about his top-end speed, he rarely is tracked from behind in the open field and plays with reckless abandon with the ball in his hands. If he is able to properly address his character issues, Floyd might make the race for the No. 1 spot closer than anyone anticipates.3. Kendall Wright, Baylor, WR (5-10, 190): Wright has scouts drooling over his extraordinary combination of speed, athleticism and burst. He routinely blows past defenders on vertical routes but also flashes the ability to wreak havoc on "catch-and-run" plays on the outside. While he still remains unpolished as a route runner, the potential for Wright to make a Mike Wallace-like impact on the NFL has sent his stock soaring in war rooms across the league.4. Alshon Jeffrey*, South Carolina, WR (6-4, 229): Jeffrey is a jump ball specialist with the size and athleticism that scouts covet in a No. 1 receiver. He excels at coming down with contested balls in traffic and is an indefensible target in the red area. Although he remains unrefined as a route runner and lacks top end speed, Jeffrey's size, strength and movement skills could prompt a team to envision him blossoming into a Plaxico Burress-type playmaker in the passing game.5. Dwayne Allen*, Clemson, TE (6-4, 255): Scouts looking for the next tight end capable of creating mismatches should closely examine Allen's game. He displays the speed and athleticism to run away from linebackers, while possessing the size and strength to overpower defenders in tight quarters. The combination of skills makes him impossible to guard in passing situations, a quality that makes him a coveted prospect in many war rooms across the league. He could be the next hybrid tight end to take the league by storm.6. Orson Charles*, Georgia, TE (6-3, 242): Charles has all of the physical tools to become a matchup nightmare as a pro. He runs like a receiver but has the size and strength to maul small defenders in isolated matchups. He is capable of stretching the field down the middle, while also acting as the primary target between the hashes. Although he must continue to develop as a blocker, his ability to impact the passing game as a vertical threat makes him a hot commodity in draft rooms.7. Nick Toon, Wisconsin, WR (6-2, 220): Toon has been a bit of a disappointment this season, but his combination of size, strength and ball skills entices scouts. He flashes the ability to make plays between the hashes, while also acting as a sneaky deep threat in the Badgers' passing game. Toon has struggled gaining separation from defenders in tight coverage, but he could improve in that area with more reps and experience. With more teams looking for big, physical receivers to anchor their passing games, Toon's value remains high throughout the league.8. Coby Fleener, Stanford, TE (6-6, 245): It's hard to find a tight end prospect with experience playing from a traditional alignment, but Fleener has been well groomed from his time at Stanford. He thrived in the Pac-12 running pro-style routes over the middle of the field, but he also acted as the Cardinal's lone deep threat the past two seasons. He led FBS with 10 touchdown receptions and posted an impressive 20.3 yards per catch average that is uncommon for the position. In addition, he displayed a gritty disposition as a blocker that makes it easy to envision him blossoming into an every down player as a pro. With few tight ends rivaling his overall game, it is quite possible that Fleener emerges as the top tight end on this list by draft day.9. Dwight Jones, North Carolina, WR (6-4, 225): From a production standpoint, it is hard to dispute Jones' inclusion on this list after scoring 11 touchdowns and surpassing the 1,000-yard mark in 2011. He has the combination of size, speed and athleticism to emerge as a No. 1 receiver as a pro, and scouts are excited about his dramatic improvement as a senior. If he can continue to dazzle during the college all-star game circuit, Jones might climb higher on charts around the league.10. Tommy Streeter*, Miami, WR, (6-5, 215): Streeter might be a surprising inclusion on this list, but a close look at his game reveals a big, athletic playmaker with speed to burn. He excels at blowing past defenders on vertical routes and is also a crafty route over the middle. His size and athleticism makes an ideal target as a potential No. 1 receiver. He needs to display better consistency with his hands(*Denotes underclassmen)1. Trent Richardson*, Alabama, RB (5-11, 224): Talented runner with a pro-ready game, Richardson excels at grinding out tough yardage between the tackles, while also providing explosive plays on perimeter runs. Richardson is also regarded as an exceptional receiver, which makes him an ideal feature back. With several evaluators viewing Richardson as a better prospect than his predecessor (Mark Ingram), he is the undisputed choice as the top runner in college football.2. David Wilson*, Virginia Tech, RB (5-10, 205): Wilson is an explosive playmaker built in the mold of Ray Rice. He possesses the speed and quickness to scare defenders in space, but is also rugged enough to effectively run in tight quarters. Although his size leads to questions about his ability to carry the load, the fact that he finished 2011 with nine games with 20-plus carries suggests he is more than capable of being a workhorse.3. Lamar Miller*, Miami (Fla.), RB (5-11, 212): Miller is a smooth runner with deceptive speed and quickness. He displays exceptional vision and awareness finding creases on the backside, and his surprising toughness on inside runs draws comparisons to former Hurricane Clinton Portis. While his dramatic drop in production during the final half of the season (only two 100-yard rushing games over final seven weeks) leads to questions about his ability to handle a heavy workload, his superior talent will make him hard to bypass as a potential franchise back.4. LaMichael James*, Oregon, RB (5-9, 195): James is the dynamic playmaker that most offensive coordinators covet as a change-of-pace back in the backfield. He possesses a combination of speed, quickness and agility that makes him a threat to score from anywhere on the field. He shines as a runner/receiver in the Ducks' spread system. While there are certainly questions about whether James' remarkable production is a byproduct of playing in a wide-open scheme, he has potential to thrive as a Darren Sproles-like weapon for a creative playcaller.5. Chris Polk*, Washington, RB (5-11, 222): As a hard-nosed runner with a crafty running style, Polk is one of college football's best runners between the tackles. He bounces through traffic and consistently finds a way to get to the second level. While he lacks elite speed, his combination of footwork and power allows him to thrive within the 15-yard box, which is key to being a productive pro runner.6. Bernard Pierce*, Temple, RB (6-0, 218): After spearheading the Owls' resurgence with his hard-nosed running style and robust production, Pierce is unquestionably one of the top workhorses in college football. He is at his best grinding between the tackles on a series of power runs, but also flashes the burst to get around the corner. Although the inferior level of competition he has faced might factor into the equation when assessing his ability, Pierce is a legitimate runner.7. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati, RB (5-10, 200): Pead is an explosive jitterbug with the speed and quickness to be an effective change of pace back as a pro. He attacks the line of scrimmage with a burst, but also possesses the balance and body control to run through tackles at the second level. His dangerous open-field running skills also make him an effective playmaker in the passing game. Pead routinely turns screens into big plays, and his versatility will make him a coveted prospect in several war rooms across the league.8. Cyrus Gray, Texas A&M, RB (5-10, 212): Gray is a blue-collar runner with vision, quickness and cutback skills. His decisive, "one-cut" running style leads to few negative runs and is ideally suited to the zone-based scheme predominantly used in the pro game. He might lack the big-play potential of others on this list, but his combination of athleticism and toughness makes him an enticing prospect for teams looking for an undervalued player.9. Montee Ball, Wisconsin, RB (5-11, 212): Ball is the most productive runner in college football with 32 rushing touchdowns in 275 carries. His penchant for finding the paint is admirable, but scouts are more concerned with his ability to elude and avoid defenders in traffic. He doesn't appear to possess elite speed or quickness, and the Badgers' talented offensive line routinely springs him to the second level unimpeded. Ball is certainly talented, but he lacks some of the blue-chip traits of his counterparts.10. Doug Martin, Boise State, RB (5-9, 210): Martin isn't as flashy as some runners on this list, but his game is built for the pros. He is a rugged inside runner with underrated power, and he has a knack for falling forward at the end of runs. His ability to finish is one of his biggest traits, and coaches will appreciate his steady game as a finisher in a four-minute situation. Martin isn't a workhorse runner to build an offense around, but he is a solid complementary player as part of a rotation.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d824dcc62/article/top-10-wrtes-osus-blackmon-headlines-explosive-group
The closest list I have seen yet to my own early and fluid rankings. Biggest issue is Doug Martin being so low on the RB list.
 
1. Justin Blackmon*, Oklahoma State WR (6-1, 215): The most explosive receiver in college football has a game that is eerily similar to Terrell Owens'. His combination of size, strength and athleticism overwhelms defenders, and his penchant for playmaking makes him a potential anchor for a sophisticated passing game. Throw in the fact that Oklahoma State's coaches frequently have suggested Blackmon's skills are more advanced than Dez Bryant's at a similar stage, it's easy to place Blackmon at the top of the list.2. Michael Floyd, Notre Dame, WR (6-3, 224): Floyd might rank as the best pass catcher in college football since Larry Fitzgerald. He displays unbelievable ball skills and has a knack for making the acrobatic catch look routine. Although there are questions about his top-end speed, he rarely is tracked from behind in the open field and plays with reckless abandon with the ball in his hands. If he is able to properly address his character issues, Floyd might make the race for the No. 1 spot closer than anyone anticipates.3. Kendall Wright, Baylor, WR (5-10, 190): Wright has scouts drooling over his extraordinary combination of speed, athleticism and burst. He routinely blows past defenders on vertical routes but also flashes the ability to wreak havoc on "catch-and-run" plays on the outside. While he still remains unpolished as a route runner, the potential for Wright to make a Mike Wallace-like impact on the NFL has sent his stock soaring in war rooms across the league.4. Alshon Jeffrey*, South Carolina, WR (6-4, 229): Jeffrey is a jump ball specialist with the size and athleticism that scouts covet in a No. 1 receiver. He excels at coming down with contested balls in traffic and is an indefensible target in the red area. Although he remains unrefined as a route runner and lacks top end speed, Jeffrey's size, strength and movement skills could prompt a team to envision him blossoming into a Plaxico Burress-type playmaker in the passing game.5. Dwayne Allen*, Clemson, TE (6-4, 255): Scouts looking for the next tight end capable of creating mismatches should closely examine Allen's game. He displays the speed and athleticism to run away from linebackers, while possessing the size and strength to overpower defenders in tight quarters. The combination of skills makes him impossible to guard in passing situations, a quality that makes him a coveted prospect in many war rooms across the league. He could be the next hybrid tight end to take the league by storm.6. Orson Charles*, Georgia, TE (6-3, 242): Charles has all of the physical tools to become a matchup nightmare as a pro. He runs like a receiver but has the size and strength to maul small defenders in isolated matchups. He is capable of stretching the field down the middle, while also acting as the primary target between the hashes. Although he must continue to develop as a blocker, his ability to impact the passing game as a vertical threat makes him a hot commodity in draft rooms.7. Nick Toon, Wisconsin, WR (6-2, 220): Toon has been a bit of a disappointment this season, but his combination of size, strength and ball skills entices scouts. He flashes the ability to make plays between the hashes, while also acting as a sneaky deep threat in the Badgers' passing game. Toon has struggled gaining separation from defenders in tight coverage, but he could improve in that area with more reps and experience. With more teams looking for big, physical receivers to anchor their passing games, Toon's value remains high throughout the league.8. Coby Fleener, Stanford, TE (6-6, 245): It's hard to find a tight end prospect with experience playing from a traditional alignment, but Fleener has been well groomed from his time at Stanford. He thrived in the Pac-12 running pro-style routes over the middle of the field, but he also acted as the Cardinal's lone deep threat the past two seasons. He led FBS with 10 touchdown receptions and posted an impressive 20.3 yards per catch average that is uncommon for the position. In addition, he displayed a gritty disposition as a blocker that makes it easy to envision him blossoming into an every down player as a pro. With few tight ends rivaling his overall game, it is quite possible that Fleener emerges as the top tight end on this list by draft day.9. Dwight Jones, North Carolina, WR (6-4, 225): From a production standpoint, it is hard to dispute Jones' inclusion on this list after scoring 11 touchdowns and surpassing the 1,000-yard mark in 2011. He has the combination of size, speed and athleticism to emerge as a No. 1 receiver as a pro, and scouts are excited about his dramatic improvement as a senior. If he can continue to dazzle during the college all-star game circuit, Jones might climb higher on charts around the league.10. Tommy Streeter*, Miami, WR, (6-5, 215): Streeter might be a surprising inclusion on this list, but a close look at his game reveals a big, athletic playmaker with speed to burn. He excels at blowing past defenders on vertical routes and is also a crafty route over the middle. His size and athleticism makes an ideal target as a potential No. 1 receiver. He needs to display better consistency with his hands(*Denotes underclassmen)1. Trent Richardson*, Alabama, RB (5-11, 224): Talented runner with a pro-ready game, Richardson excels at grinding out tough yardage between the tackles, while also providing explosive plays on perimeter runs. Richardson is also regarded as an exceptional receiver, which makes him an ideal feature back. With several evaluators viewing Richardson as a better prospect than his predecessor (Mark Ingram), he is the undisputed choice as the top runner in college football.2. David Wilson*, Virginia Tech, RB (5-10, 205): Wilson is an explosive playmaker built in the mold of Ray Rice. He possesses the speed and quickness to scare defenders in space, but is also rugged enough to effectively run in tight quarters. Although his size leads to questions about his ability to carry the load, the fact that he finished 2011 with nine games with 20-plus carries suggests he is more than capable of being a workhorse.3. Lamar Miller*, Miami (Fla.), RB (5-11, 212): Miller is a smooth runner with deceptive speed and quickness. He displays exceptional vision and awareness finding creases on the backside, and his surprising toughness on inside runs draws comparisons to former Hurricane Clinton Portis. While his dramatic drop in production during the final half of the season (only two 100-yard rushing games over final seven weeks) leads to questions about his ability to handle a heavy workload, his superior talent will make him hard to bypass as a potential franchise back.4. LaMichael James*, Oregon, RB (5-9, 195): James is the dynamic playmaker that most offensive coordinators covet as a change-of-pace back in the backfield. He possesses a combination of speed, quickness and agility that makes him a threat to score from anywhere on the field. He shines as a runner/receiver in the Ducks' spread system. While there are certainly questions about whether James' remarkable production is a byproduct of playing in a wide-open scheme, he has potential to thrive as a Darren Sproles-like weapon for a creative playcaller.5. Chris Polk*, Washington, RB (5-11, 222): As a hard-nosed runner with a crafty running style, Polk is one of college football's best runners between the tackles. He bounces through traffic and consistently finds a way to get to the second level. While he lacks elite speed, his combination of footwork and power allows him to thrive within the 15-yard box, which is key to being a productive pro runner.6. Bernard Pierce*, Temple, RB (6-0, 218): After spearheading the Owls' resurgence with his hard-nosed running style and robust production, Pierce is unquestionably one of the top workhorses in college football. He is at his best grinding between the tackles on a series of power runs, but also flashes the burst to get around the corner. Although the inferior level of competition he has faced might factor into the equation when assessing his ability, Pierce is a legitimate runner.7. Isaiah Pead, Cincinnati, RB (5-10, 200): Pead is an explosive jitterbug with the speed and quickness to be an effective change of pace back as a pro. He attacks the line of scrimmage with a burst, but also possesses the balance and body control to run through tackles at the second level. His dangerous open-field running skills also make him an effective playmaker in the passing game. Pead routinely turns screens into big plays, and his versatility will make him a coveted prospect in several war rooms across the league.8. Cyrus Gray, Texas A&M, RB (5-10, 212): Gray is a blue-collar runner with vision, quickness and cutback skills. His decisive, "one-cut" running style leads to few negative runs and is ideally suited to the zone-based scheme predominantly used in the pro game. He might lack the big-play potential of others on this list, but his combination of athleticism and toughness makes him an enticing prospect for teams looking for an undervalued player.9. Montee Ball, Wisconsin, RB (5-11, 212): Ball is the most productive runner in college football with 32 rushing touchdowns in 275 carries. His penchant for finding the paint is admirable, but scouts are more concerned with his ability to elude and avoid defenders in traffic. He doesn't appear to possess elite speed or quickness, and the Badgers' talented offensive line routinely springs him to the second level unimpeded. Ball is certainly talented, but he lacks some of the blue-chip traits of his counterparts.10. Doug Martin, Boise State, RB (5-9, 210): Martin isn't as flashy as some runners on this list, but his game is built for the pros. He is a rugged inside runner with underrated power, and he has a knack for falling forward at the end of runs. His ability to finish is one of his biggest traits, and coaches will appreciate his steady game as a finisher in a four-minute situation. Martin isn't a workhorse runner to build an offense around, but he is a solid complementary player as part of a rotation.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d824dcc62/article/top-10-wrtes-osus-blackmon-headlines-explosive-group
The closest list I have seen yet to my own early and fluid rankings. Biggest issue is Doug Martin being so low on the RB list.
Agreed, at minimum he's #4.
 
The closest list I have seen yet to my own early and fluid rankings. Biggest issue is Doug Martin being so low on the RB list.
Agreed, at minimum he's #4.
I don't like Miller that much. ;)
LOL, I like Miller but I not sure exactly when I'd take him. Top 5 for sure just not sure when. I still have some more Miami games I'm going to be looking at this weekend and will be adding more videos to the Cream of the Crop Thread. Martin could even be #2 for me. He has a wicked spin move, he doesn't lose any speed when he spins......seems like he actually speeds up during the spin and just takes off. I can't explain it cause I've never seen a back with that type of spin EVER. Even Barry Sanders spin move can't compare to he's.ETA: Montee Ball is waaaay to low as well. :football: :2cents:Tex
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oregon RB LaMichael James will forgo his senior season and enter the 2012 NFL draft.

The Ducks' all-time leader in rushing (4,923) and rushing touchdowns (52), James was eligible for the 2011 draft but opted to stay in school in an effort to bulk up and improve his NFL prospects. Now listed at 5'9/195, James is a scatback prospect and managed just a 4.59 forty-yard dash time during Oregon's winter testing last year. James was oftentimes dominant in the Pac-12, but he projects as no better than a middle-round pick for the pros. He was selected as a second-team All-American by the AP Wednesday, joining Virginia Tech's David Wilson behind first-teamers Trent Richardson (Alabama) and Montee Ball (Wisconsin).

 
Ebf >> da'rick Rogers and Justin hunter are the best wr duo in the NCAA. Well, they will be next year. ;)

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top