Best Fantasy Schedules for WR (1 Viewer)

David Yudkin · Nov 15, 2011

Like the threads for the other positions, here are the best schedules in Weeks 14-16 for WR based on results from Weeks 1-10. 0 PPR, 1 pt = 10 yds, 6 pts = TD.

For example, WAS . . .

NE = 1st highest fantasy points allowed to WR

NYG = 16th highest fantasy points allowed to WR

MIN = 3rd highest fantasy points allowed to WR

Total = 20

Code:

WAS	1	16	3	20	NE, NYG, MINMIA	13	9	1	23	PHI, BUF, NEBUF	17	7	4	28	SD, MIA, DENDEN	19	1	9	29	CHI, NE, BUFCHI	4	20	6	30	DEN, SEA, GBNE	24	4	7	35	WAS, DEN, MIACIN	23	5	8	36	HOU, STL, ARISEA	5	19	12	36	STL, CHI, SFDET	3	18	17	38	MIN, OAK, SDNO	29	3	10	42	TEN, MIN, ATLNYJ	14	13	16	43	KC, PHI, NYGDAL	16	15	13	44	NYG, TB, PHITEN	11	2	31	44	NO, IND, JAXOAK	6	26	14	46	GB, DET, KCCAR	10	23	15	48	ATL, HOU, TBPIT	32	12	5	49	CLE, SF, STLBAL	2	17	32	51	IND, SD, CLEGB	18	14	19	51	OAK, KC, CHIKC	27	6	18	51	NYJ, GB, OAKHOU	22	28	2	52	CIN, CAR, INDJAC	15	10	29	54	TB, ATL, TENSD	9	21	26	56	BUF, BAL, DETSF	8	30	20	58	ARI, PIT, SEACLE	30	8	21	59	PIT, ARI, BALPHI	7	27	25	59	MIA, NYJ, DALMIN	26	11	24	61	DET, NO, WASARI	12	32	22	66	SF, CLE, CINATL	28	31	11	70	CAR, JAX, NOSTL	20	22	30	72	SEA, CIN, PITIND	21	29	23	73	BAL, TEN, HOUNYG	25	24	27	76	DAL, WAS, NYJTB	31	25	28	84	JAX, DAL, CAR

Instinctive · Nov 15, 2011

Unfortunate that WAS is so bad a team.

I will try and just pull out the week 15/16 ones and see how that changes rankings for those who have 2 week title matchups and/or week 14 byes.

BroncoFreak_2K3 · Nov 15, 2011

Can we please have Week 17 added into the table as well??

Instinctive · Nov 15, 2011

'BroncoFreak_2K3 said:
Request to please add Week 17 into the table as well??

If somebody decides to do this, please do it separately. I (and many others I am sure) have never been in a league that plays week 17.Same thing for the separating of week 15 and 16 from week 14 - I will make a separate post of just that info.

LargeMouthBass · Nov 15, 2011

This list can be misleading. We all know GBs pass D sucks but did you see Minnesota last night?

Instinctive · Nov 15, 2011

This is weeks 15 and 16 only. Enjoy!

When there was a tie, I put the team with the better week 16 matchup first. I think. I may have missed one.

MIA 9 1 10 BUF, NEDEN 1 9 10 NE, BUFBUF 7 4 11 MIA, DENNE 4 7 11 DEN, MIACIN 5 8 13 STL, ARINO 3 10 13 MIN, ATLPIT 12 5 17 SF, STLWAS 16 3 19 NYG, MINKC 6 18 24 GB, OAKCHI 20 6 26 SEA, GBDAL 15 13 28 TB, PHINYJ 13 16 29 PHI, NYGCLE 8 21 29 ARI, BALHOU 28 2 30 CAR, INDSEA 19 12 31 CHI, SFGB 14 19 33 KC, CHITEN 2 31 33 IND, JAXDET 18 17 35 OAK, SDMIN 11 24 35 NO, WASCAR 23 15 38 HOU, TBJAC 10 29 39 ATL, TENOAK 26 14 40 DET, KCATL 31 11 42 JAX, NOSD 21 26 47 BAL, DETBAL 17 32 49 SD, CLESF 30 20 50 PIT, SEANYG 24 27 51 WAS, NYJIND 29 23 52 TEN, HOUPHI 27 25 52 NYJ, DALSTL 22 30 52 CIN, PITTB 25 28 53 DAL, CARARI 32 22 54 CLE, CIN
ETA:

Something I noticed is that if you take out week 14, Pittsburgh jumps way up on the list.

Khy · Nov 15, 2011

'LargeMouthBass said:
This list can be misleading. We all know GBs pass D sucks but did you see Minnesota last night?

It isn't misleading. It's a metric. It's not saying in the playoffs Anthony Armstrong is a better start than Hakeem Nicks. It's just showing you strength of schedule. This could be largely useful for someone looking to make a last minute trade or two for the playoff run. Take it at face value not as gods word.

gump · Nov 15, 2011

'Instinctive said:
This is weeks 15 and 16 only. Enjoy!

Thanks Instinctive...read my mind.

DeaLerZ · Nov 15, 2011

'Instinctive said:
Unfortunate that WAS is so bad a team.I will try and just pull out the week 15/16 ones and see how that changes rankings for those who have 2 week title matchups and/or week 14 byes.

True... but Santana Moss should be back week 12... and I figure after a couple of hit or miss weeks ... by week 14 should be back to top form and we all know how much Grossman targets him as long as he remains the starter and Washington keeps losing games.. he could be a great WR #3 for those of us in need for the playoffs

FantasyTrader · Nov 15, 2011

Last week I wrote an article using Fantasy Outsiders "Defense Vs. WR Types" grid and noted the matchups vs. WR1, WR2, Other WR, Receiving RB and TE that are much better or worse than that particular defenses overall ranking. Something else to consider in conjunction with SOS.

I simply went through the remainder of the NFL schedule (weeks 10-17) and identified the team and position which stands to gain/lose from the individual matchup compared to the opposition’s overall ranking.

I sifted through the 32 NFL teams and took note of any positional ranking that was +/- 12 spots of that defenses overall rank. For example, under the heading “BETTER THAN ADVERTISED” in Week 10 you see NEP TE/Jets 1:29. That’s simply pointing out the fact that, while conventional start/sit recommendations would suggest a tough matchup for Tom Brady’s TE tandem of Aaron Hernandez and Rob Gronkowski this weekend against the Jets #1 ranked pass defense overall, the truth is that matchup is practically as good as it gets! (29th vs. TE)

As you’re reviewing my notes below, please be mindful of the fact that, in Fantasy Outsider’s assessment of stats allowed to opposing positions, they admit their “decision of which receiver is 'number one' and which receiver is 'number two' is somewhat subjective”; clearly something to keep in mind when applying these stats to your own roster decisions.

BETTER THAN ADVERTISED

Week 10: NEP TE/Jets 1:29, TB WR1/Texans 5:30, DET WR1/Bears 6:18, IND WR2/Jaguars 7:23, NYG WR1/49ers 8:25, BUF WR2/Cowboys 9:21, BUF TE/Cowboys 9:21, MIA rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, SF other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, ARI other WR/Eagles 14:26, CLE WR2/Rams 16:31, CLE other WR/Rams 16:30, DAL WR1/Bills 17:31, OAK other WR/Chargers 19:32.

Week 11: DEN TE/Jets 1:29, SDC WR1/Bears 6:18, CLE WR2/Jaguars 7:23, ARI WR1/49ers 8:25, WAS WR2/Cowboys 9:21, WAS TE/Cowboys 9:21, DAL rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, PHI other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NYG other WR/Eagles 14:26, SEA WR2/Rams 16:31, SEA other WR/Rams 16:30, MIA WR1/Bills 17:31, CHI other WR/Chargers 19:32.

Week 12: BUF TE/Jets 1:29, JAC WR1/Texans 5:30, OAK WR1/Bears 6:18, HOU WR2/Jaguars 7:23, BAL WR1/49ers 8:25, MIA WR2/Cowboys 9:21, MIA TE/Cowboys 9:21, SEA rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, NOS other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NEP other WR/Eagles 14:26, ARI WR2/Rams 16:31, AR other WR/Rams 16:30, NYJ WR1/Bills 17:31, DEN other WR/Chargers 19:32.

Week 13: WAS TE/Jets 1:29, ATL WR1/Texans 5:30, KCC WR1/Bears 6:18, SDC WR2/Jaguars 7:23, STL WR1/49ers 8:25, ARI WR2/Cowboys 9:21, ARI TE/Cowboys 9:21, NYJ rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, GBP other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, SEA other WR/Eagles 14:26, SF WR2/Rams 16:31, SF other WR/Rams 16:30, TEN WR1/Bills 17:31, JAC other WR/Chargers 19:32.

Week 14: KCC TE/Jets 1:29, CIN WR1/Texans 5:30, DEN WR1/ Bears 6:18, TAM WR2/Jaguars 7:23, ARI WR1/49ers 8:25, NYG WR2/Cowboys 9:21, NYG TE/Cowboys 9:21, NEP rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, DAL other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, MIA other WR/Eagles 14:26, SEA WR2/Rams 16:31, SEA other WR/Rams 16:30, SDC WR1/Bills 17:31, BUF other WR/Chargers 19:32.

Week 15: PHI TE/Jets 1:29, CAR WR1/Texans 5:30, SEA WR1/Bears 6:18, ATL WR2/Jaguars 7:23, PIT WR1/49ers 8:25, TAM WR2/Cowboys 9:21, TAM TE/Cowboys 9:21, NYG rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, WAS other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NYJ other WR/Eagles 14:26, CIN WR2/Rams 16:31, CIN other WR/Rams 16:30, MIA WR1/Bills 17:31, BAL other WR/Chargers 19:32.

Week 16: NYG TE/Jets 1:29, IND WR1/Texans 5:30, GBP WR1/Bears 6:18, TEN WR2/Jaguars 7:23, SEA WR1/49ers 8:25, PHI WR2/Cowboys 9:21, PHI TE/Cowboys 9:21, MIN rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, NYJ other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, DAL other WR/Eagles 14:26, PIT WR2/Rams 16:31, PIT other WR/Rams 16:30, DEN WR1/Bills 17:31, DET other WR/Chargers 19:32.

Week 17: MIA TE/Jets 1:29, TEN WR1/Texans 5:30, MIN WR1/Bears 6:18, IND WR2/Jaguars 7:23, STL WR1/49ers 8:25, NYG WR2/Cowboys 9:21, NYG TE/Cowboys 9:21, PHI rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, DAL other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, WAS other WR/Eagles 14:26, SF WR2/Rams 16:31, SF other WR/Rams 16:30, NEP WR1/Bills 17:31, OAK other WR/Chargers 19:32.

To reiterate, the following are what are widely considered to be mediocre to poor overall NFL defenses that present a bad matchup for the preceding position/team by week. For example, under week 10 you see (SDC TE/Raiders 25:3) the Raiders are ranked 25th overall vs. the pass, however - on paper - they present a very difficult matchup for Antonio Gates (3rd vs. TE).

WORSE THAN ADVERTISED

Week 10: ARI TE/Eagles 14:1, CLE WR1/Rams 16:3, CLE TE/Rams 16:4, DAL other WR/Bills 17:2, MIN WR2/Packers 20:8, MIN other WR/Packers 20:5, DEN WR1/Chiefs 22:2, DEN other WR/Chiefs 22:9, BAL TE/Seahawks 23:8, SDC WR1/Raiders 25:10, SDC TE/Raiders 25:3, NYJ rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, CAR WR2/Titans 27:14, CAR other WR/Titans 27:4, TEN WR1/Panthers 28:14, TEN WR2/Panthers 28:13, TEN other WR/Panthers 28:15, PHI WR2/Cardinals 29:16, PHI rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, HOU TE/Bucs 30:17, HOU rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, WAS TE/Dolphins 31:15, JAC rec. RB/Colts 32:14.

Week 11: NYG TE/Eagles 14:1, SEA WR1/ Rams 16:3, SEA TE/Rams 16:4, MIA other WR/Bills 17:2, TB WR2/Packers 20:8, TB other WR/Packers 20:5, NEP WR1/Chiefs 22:2, NEP other WR/Chiefs 22:9, STL TE/Seahawks 23:8, MIN WR1/Raiders 25:10, MIN TE/Raiders 25:3, KCC rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, ATL WR2/Titans 27:14, ATL other WR/Titans 27:4, DET WR1/Panthers 28:14, DET WR2/Panthers 28:13, DET other WR/Panthers 28:15, SF WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SF rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, GBP TE/Bucs 30:17, GBP rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, BUF TE/Dolphins 31:15.

Week 12: NEP TE/Eagles 14:1, ARI WR1/Rams 16:3, ARI TE/Rams 16:4, NYJ other WR/Bills 17:2, DET WR 2/Packers 20:8, DET other WR/Packers 20:5, PIT WR1/Chiefs 22:2, PIT other WR/Chiefs 22:9, WAS TE/Seahawks 23:8, CHI WR1/Raiders 25:10, CHI TE/Raiders 25:3, PHI rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, TB WR2/Titans 27:14, TB other WR/Titans 27:4, IND WR1/Panthers 28:14, IND WR2/Panthers 28:13, IND other WR/Panthers 28:15, STL WR2/Cardinals 29:16, STL rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, TEN TE/Bucs 30:17, TEN rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, DAL TE/Dolphins 31:15, CAR rec. RB/Colts 32:14.

Week 13: SEA TE/Eagles 14:1, SF WR1/Rams 16:3, SF TE/Rams 16:4, TEN other WR/Bills 17:2, NYG WR2/Packers 20:8, NYG other WR/Packers 20:5, CHI WR1/Chiefs 22:2, CHI other WR/Chiefs 22:9, PHI TE/Seahawks 23:8, MIA WR1/Raiders 25:10, MIA TE/Raiders 25:3, IND rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, BUF WR2/Titans 27:14, BUF other WR/Titans 27:4, TB WR1/Panthers 28:14, TBWR2/Panthers 28:13, TB other WR/Panthers 28:15, DAL WR2/Cardinals 29:16, DAL rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, CAR TE/Bucs 30:17, CAR rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, OAK TE/Dolphins 31:15, NEP rec. RB/Colts 32:14.

Week 14: MIA TE/Eagles 14:1, SEA WR1/Rams 16:3, SEA TE/Rams 16:4, SDC other WR/Bills 17:2, OAK WR2/Packers 20:8, OAK other WR/Packers 20:5, NYJ WR1/Chiefs 22:2, NYJ other WR/Chiefs 22:9, STL TE/Seahawks 23:8, GBP WR1/Raiders 25:10, GBP TE/Raiders 25:3, WAS rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, NOS WR2/Titans 27:14, NOS other WR/Titans 27:4, ATL WR1/Panthers 28:14, ATL WR2/Panthers 28:13, ATL other WR/Panthers 28:15, SF WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SF rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, JAC TE/Bucs 30:17, JAC rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, PHI TE/Dolphins 31:15, BAL rec. RB/Colts 32:14.

Week 15: NYJ TE/Eagles 14:1, CIN WR1/Rams 16:3, CIN TE/Rams 16:4, MIA other WR/Bills 17:2, KC WR2/Packers 20:8, KC other WR/Packers 20:5, GBP WR1/Chiefs 22:2, GBP other WR/Chiefs 22:9, CHI TE/Seahawks 23:8, DET WR1/Raiders 25:10, DET TE/Raiders 25:3, DEN rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, IND WR2/Titans 27:14, IND other WR/Titans 27:4, HOU WR1/Panthers 28:14, HOU WR2/Panthers 28:13, HOU other WR/Panthers 28:15, CLE WR2/Cardinals 29:16, CLE rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, DAL TE/Bucs 30:17, DAL rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, BUF TE/Dolphins 31:15, TEN rec. RB/Colts 32:14.

Week 16: DAL TE/Eagles 14:1, PIT WR1/Rams 16:3, PIT TE/Rams 16:4, DEN other WR/Bills 17:2, CHI WR2/Packers 20:8, CHI other WR/Packers 20:5, OAK WR1/Chiefs 22:2, OAK other WR/Chiefs 22:9, SF TE/Seahawks 23:8, KCC WR1/Raiders 25:10, KCC TE/Raiders 25:3, MIA rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, JAC WR2/Titans 27:14, JAC other WR/Titans 27:4, TB WR1/Panthers 28:14, TB WR2/Panthers 28:13, TB other WR/Panthers 28:15, CIN WR2/Cardinals 29:16, CIN rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, CAR TE/Bucs 30:17, CAR rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, NEP TE/Dolphins 31:15, HOU rec. RB/Colts 32:14.

Week 17: WAS TE/Eagles 14:1, SF WR1/Rams 16:3, SF TE/Rams 16:4, NEP other WR/Bills 17:2, DET WR2/Packers 20:8, DET other WR/Packers 20:5, DEN WR1/Chiefs 22:2, DEN other WR/Chiefs 22:9, ARI TE/Seahawks 23:8, SDC WR1/Raiders 25:10, SDC TE/Raiders 25:3, BUF rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, HOU WR2/Titans 27:14, HOU other WR/Titans 27:4, NOS WR1/Panthers 28:14, NOS WR2/Panthers 28:13, NOS other WR/Panthers 28:15, SEA WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SEA rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, ATL TE/Bucs 30:17, ATL rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, NYJ TE/Dolphins 31:15, JAC rec. RB/Colts 32:14.

Instinctive · Nov 15, 2011

That is unreadable dude. Thanks for the effort though.

Tony Reali · Nov 15, 2011

'FantasyTrader said:
Last week I wrote an article using Fantasy Outsiders "Defense Vs. WR Types" grid and noted the matchups vs. WR1, WR2, Other WR, Receiving RB and TE that are much better or worse than that particular defenses overall ranking. Something else to consider in conjunction with SOS.I simply went through the remainder of the NFL schedule (weeks 10-17) and identified the team and position which stands to gain/lose from the individual matchup compared to the opposition’s overall ranking. I sifted through the 32 NFL teams and took note of any positional ranking that was +/- 12 spots of that defenses overall rank. For example, under the heading “BETTER THAN ADVERTISED” in Week 10 you see NEP TE/Jets 1:29. That’s simply pointing out the fact that, while conventional start/sit recommendations would suggest a tough matchup for Tom Brady’s TE tandem of Aaron Hernandez and Rob Gronkowski this weekend against the Jets #1 ranked pass defense overall, the truth is that matchup is practically as good as it gets! (29th vs. TE)As you’re reviewing my notes below, please be mindful of the fact that, in Fantasy Outsider’s assessment of stats allowed to opposing positions, they admit their “decision of which receiver is 'number one' and which receiver is 'number two' is somewhat subjective”; clearly something to keep in mind when applying these stats to your own roster decisions.BETTER THAN ADVERTISEDWeek 10: NEP TE/Jets 1:29, TB WR1/Texans 5:30, DET WR1/Bears 6:18, IND WR2/Jaguars 7:23, NYG WR1/49ers 8:25, BUF WR2/Cowboys 9:21, BUF TE/Cowboys 9:21, MIA rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, SF other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, ARI other WR/Eagles 14:26, CLE WR2/Rams 16:31, CLE other WR/Rams 16:30, DAL WR1/Bills 17:31, OAK other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 11: DEN TE/Jets 1:29, SDC WR1/Bears 6:18, CLE WR2/Jaguars 7:23, ARI WR1/49ers 8:25, WAS WR2/Cowboys 9:21, WAS TE/Cowboys 9:21, DAL rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, PHI other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NYG other WR/Eagles 14:26, SEA WR2/Rams 16:31, SEA other WR/Rams 16:30, MIA WR1/Bills 17:31, CHI other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 12: BUF TE/Jets 1:29, JAC WR1/Texans 5:30, OAK WR1/Bears 6:18, HOU WR2/Jaguars 7:23, BAL WR1/49ers 8:25, MIA WR2/Cowboys 9:21, MIA TE/Cowboys 9:21, SEA rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, NOS other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NEP other WR/Eagles 14:26, ARI WR2/Rams 16:31, AR other WR/Rams 16:30, NYJ WR1/Bills 17:31, DEN other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 13: WAS TE/Jets 1:29, ATL WR1/Texans 5:30, KCC WR1/Bears 6:18, SDC WR2/Jaguars 7:23, STL WR1/49ers 8:25, ARI WR2/Cowboys 9:21, ARI TE/Cowboys 9:21, NYJ rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, GBP other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, SEA other WR/Eagles 14:26, SF WR2/Rams 16:31, SF other WR/Rams 16:30, TEN WR1/Bills 17:31, JAC other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 14: KCC TE/Jets 1:29, CIN WR1/Texans 5:30, DEN WR1/ Bears 6:18, TAM WR2/Jaguars 7:23, ARI WR1/49ers 8:25, NYG WR2/Cowboys 9:21, NYG TE/Cowboys 9:21, NEP rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, DAL other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, MIA other WR/Eagles 14:26, SEA WR2/Rams 16:31, SEA other WR/Rams 16:30, SDC WR1/Bills 17:31, BUF other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 15: PHI TE/Jets 1:29, CAR WR1/Texans 5:30, SEA WR1/Bears 6:18, ATL WR2/Jaguars 7:23, PIT WR1/49ers 8:25, TAM WR2/Cowboys 9:21, TAM TE/Cowboys 9:21, NYG rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, WAS other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NYJ other WR/Eagles 14:26, CIN WR2/Rams 16:31, CIN other WR/Rams 16:30, MIA WR1/Bills 17:31, BAL other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 16: NYG TE/Jets 1:29, IND WR1/Texans 5:30, GBP WR1/Bears 6:18, TEN WR2/Jaguars 7:23, SEA WR1/49ers 8:25, PHI WR2/Cowboys 9:21, PHI TE/Cowboys 9:21, MIN rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, NYJ other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, DAL other WR/Eagles 14:26, PIT WR2/Rams 16:31, PIT other WR/Rams 16:30, DEN WR1/Bills 17:31, DET other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 17: MIA TE/Jets 1:29, TEN WR1/Texans 5:30, MIN WR1/Bears 6:18, IND WR2/Jaguars 7:23, STL WR1/49ers 8:25, NYG WR2/Cowboys 9:21, NYG TE/Cowboys 9:21, PHI rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, DAL other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, WAS other WR/Eagles 14:26, SF WR2/Rams 16:31, SF other WR/Rams 16:30, NEP WR1/Bills 17:31, OAK other WR/Chargers 19:32.To reiterate, the following are what are widely considered to be mediocre to poor overall NFL defenses that present a bad matchup for the preceding position/team by week. For example, under week 10 you see (SDC TE/Raiders 25:3) the Raiders are ranked 25th overall vs. the pass, however - on paper - they present a very difficult matchup for Antonio Gates (3rd vs. TE).WORSE THAN ADVERTISEDWeek 10: ARI TE/Eagles 14:1, CLE WR1/Rams 16:3, CLE TE/Rams 16:4, DAL other WR/Bills 17:2, MIN WR2/Packers 20:8, MIN other WR/Packers 20:5, DEN WR1/Chiefs 22:2, DEN other WR/Chiefs 22:9, BAL TE/Seahawks 23:8, SDC WR1/Raiders 25:10, SDC TE/Raiders 25:3, NYJ rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, CAR WR2/Titans 27:14, CAR other WR/Titans 27:4, TEN WR1/Panthers 28:14, TEN WR2/Panthers 28:13, TEN other WR/Panthers 28:15, PHI WR2/Cardinals 29:16, PHI rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, HOU TE/Bucs 30:17, HOU rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, WAS TE/Dolphins 31:15, JAC rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 11: NYG TE/Eagles 14:1, SEA WR1/ Rams 16:3, SEA TE/Rams 16:4, MIA other WR/Bills 17:2, TB WR2/Packers 20:8, TB other WR/Packers 20:5, NEP WR1/Chiefs 22:2, NEP other WR/Chiefs 22:9, STL TE/Seahawks 23:8, MIN WR1/Raiders 25:10, MIN TE/Raiders 25:3, KCC rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, ATL WR2/Titans 27:14, ATL other WR/Titans 27:4, DET WR1/Panthers 28:14, DET WR2/Panthers 28:13, DET other WR/Panthers 28:15, SF WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SF rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, GBP TE/Bucs 30:17, GBP rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, BUF TE/Dolphins 31:15.Week 12: NEP TE/Eagles 14:1, ARI WR1/Rams 16:3, ARI TE/Rams 16:4, NYJ other WR/Bills 17:2, DET WR 2/Packers 20:8, DET other WR/Packers 20:5, PIT WR1/Chiefs 22:2, PIT other WR/Chiefs 22:9, WAS TE/Seahawks 23:8, CHI WR1/Raiders 25:10, CHI TE/Raiders 25:3, PHI rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, TB WR2/Titans 27:14, TB other WR/Titans 27:4, IND WR1/Panthers 28:14, IND WR2/Panthers 28:13, IND other WR/Panthers 28:15, STL WR2/Cardinals 29:16, STL rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, TEN TE/Bucs 30:17, TEN rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, DAL TE/Dolphins 31:15, CAR rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 13: SEA TE/Eagles 14:1, SF WR1/Rams 16:3, SF TE/Rams 16:4, TEN other WR/Bills 17:2, NYG WR2/Packers 20:8, NYG other WR/Packers 20:5, CHI WR1/Chiefs 22:2, CHI other WR/Chiefs 22:9, PHI TE/Seahawks 23:8, MIA WR1/Raiders 25:10, MIA TE/Raiders 25:3, IND rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, BUF WR2/Titans 27:14, BUF other WR/Titans 27:4, TB WR1/Panthers 28:14, TBWR2/Panthers 28:13, TB other WR/Panthers 28:15, DAL WR2/Cardinals 29:16, DAL rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, CAR TE/Bucs 30:17, CAR rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, OAK TE/Dolphins 31:15, NEP rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 14: MIA TE/Eagles 14:1, SEA WR1/Rams 16:3, SEA TE/Rams 16:4, SDC other WR/Bills 17:2, OAK WR2/Packers 20:8, OAK other WR/Packers 20:5, NYJ WR1/Chiefs 22:2, NYJ other WR/Chiefs 22:9, STL TE/Seahawks 23:8, GBP WR1/Raiders 25:10, GBP TE/Raiders 25:3, WAS rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, NOS WR2/Titans 27:14, NOS other WR/Titans 27:4, ATL WR1/Panthers 28:14, ATL WR2/Panthers 28:13, ATL other WR/Panthers 28:15, SF WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SF rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, JAC TE/Bucs 30:17, JAC rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, PHI TE/Dolphins 31:15, BAL rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 15: NYJ TE/Eagles 14:1, CIN WR1/Rams 16:3, CIN TE/Rams 16:4, MIA other WR/Bills 17:2, KC WR2/Packers 20:8, KC other WR/Packers 20:5, GBP WR1/Chiefs 22:2, GBP other WR/Chiefs 22:9, CHI TE/Seahawks 23:8, DET WR1/Raiders 25:10, DET TE/Raiders 25:3, DEN rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, IND WR2/Titans 27:14, IND other WR/Titans 27:4, HOU WR1/Panthers 28:14, HOU WR2/Panthers 28:13, HOU other WR/Panthers 28:15, CLE WR2/Cardinals 29:16, CLE rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, DAL TE/Bucs 30:17, DAL rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, BUF TE/Dolphins 31:15, TEN rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 16: DAL TE/Eagles 14:1, PIT WR1/Rams 16:3, PIT TE/Rams 16:4, DEN other WR/Bills 17:2, CHI WR2/Packers 20:8, CHI other WR/Packers 20:5, OAK WR1/Chiefs 22:2, OAK other WR/Chiefs 22:9, SF TE/Seahawks 23:8, KCC WR1/Raiders 25:10, KCC TE/Raiders 25:3, MIA rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, JAC WR2/Titans 27:14, JAC other WR/Titans 27:4, TB WR1/Panthers 28:14, TB WR2/Panthers 28:13, TB other WR/Panthers 28:15, CIN WR2/Cardinals 29:16, CIN rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, CAR TE/Bucs 30:17, CAR rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, NEP TE/Dolphins 31:15, HOU rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 17: WAS TE/Eagles 14:1, SF WR1/Rams 16:3, SF TE/Rams 16:4, NEP other WR/Bills 17:2, DET WR2/Packers 20:8, DET other WR/Packers 20:5, DEN WR1/Chiefs 22:2, DEN other WR/Chiefs 22:9, ARI TE/Seahawks 23:8, SDC WR1/Raiders 25:10, SDC TE/Raiders 25:3, BUF rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, HOU WR2/Titans 27:14, HOU other WR/Titans 27:4, NOS WR1/Panthers 28:14, NOS WR2/Panthers 28:13, NOS other WR/Panthers 28:15, SEA WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SEA rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, ATL TE/Bucs 30:17, ATL rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, NYJ TE/Dolphins 31:15, JAC rec. RB/Colts 32:14.

FantasyTrader · Nov 15, 2011

'Instinctive said:
That is unreadable dude. Thanks for the effort though.

It really is worth deciphering. It's amazing how many situations there are out there where a team is a top 10 pass D overall (or even a top 10 pass D vs. WR's) yet they're 18th in the league vs. WR1's. That's GREAT information for...say, Vincent Jackson owners to have this weekend.

BroncoFreak_2K3 · Nov 15, 2011

Probably be much easier to figure out if it was in a table to start with...just sayin. :loco:

Tanner9919 · Nov 16, 2011

'FantasyTrader said:
Last week I wrote an article using Fantasy Outsiders "Defense Vs. WR Types" grid and noted the matchups vs. WR1, WR2, Other WR, Receiving RB and TE that are much better or worse than that particular defenses overall ranking. Something else to consider in conjunction with SOS.I simply went through the remainder of the NFL schedule (weeks 10-17) and identified the team and position which stands to gain/lose from the individual matchup compared to the opposition’s overall ranking. I sifted through the 32 NFL teams and took note of any positional ranking that was +/- 12 spots of that defenses overall rank. For example, under the heading “BETTER THAN ADVERTISED” in Week 10 you see NEP TE/Jets 1:29. That’s simply pointing out the fact that, while conventional start/sit recommendations would suggest a tough matchup for Tom Brady’s TE tandem of Aaron Hernandez and Rob Gronkowski this weekend against the Jets #1 ranked pass defense overall, the truth is that matchup is practically as good as it gets! (29th vs. TE)As you’re reviewing my notes below, please be mindful of the fact that, in Fantasy Outsider’s assessment of stats allowed to opposing positions, they admit their “decision of which receiver is 'number one' and which receiver is 'number two' is somewhat subjective”; clearly something to keep in mind when applying these stats to your own roster decisions.BETTER THAN ADVERTISEDWeek 10: NEP TE/Jets 1:29, TB WR1/Texans 5:30, DET WR1/Bears 6:18, IND WR2/Jaguars 7:23, NYG WR1/49ers 8:25, BUF WR2/Cowboys 9:21, BUF TE/Cowboys 9:21, MIA rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, SF other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, ARI other WR/Eagles 14:26, CLE WR2/Rams 16:31, CLE other WR/Rams 16:30, DAL WR1/Bills 17:31, OAK other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 11: DEN TE/Jets 1:29, SDC WR1/Bears 6:18, CLE WR2/Jaguars 7:23, ARI WR1/49ers 8:25, WAS WR2/Cowboys 9:21, WAS TE/Cowboys 9:21, DAL rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, PHI other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NYG other WR/Eagles 14:26, SEA WR2/Rams 16:31, SEA other WR/Rams 16:30, MIA WR1/Bills 17:31, CHI other WR/Chargers 19:32.WORSE THAN ADVERTISEDWeek 10: ARI TE/Eagles 14:1, CLE WR1/Rams 16:3, CLE TE/Rams 16:4, DAL other WR/Bills 17:2, MIN WR2/Packers 20:8, MIN other WR/Packers 20:5, DEN WR1/Chiefs 22:2, DEN other WR/Chiefs 22:9, BAL TE/Seahawks 23:8, SDC WR1/Raiders 25:10, SDC TE/Raiders 25:3, NYJ rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, CAR WR2/Titans 27:14, CAR other WR/Titans 27:4, TEN WR1/Panthers 28:14, TEN WR2/Panthers 28:13, TEN other WR/Panthers 28:15, PHI WR2/Cardinals 29:16, PHI rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, HOU TE/Bucs 30:17, HOU rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, WAS TE/Dolphins 31:15, JAC rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 11: NYG TE/Eagles 14:1, SEA WR1/ Rams 16:3, SEA TE/Rams 16:4, MIA other WR/Bills 17:2, TB WR2/Packers 20:8, TB other WR/Packers 20:5, NEP WR1/Chiefs 22:2, NEP other WR/Chiefs 22:9, STL TE/Seahawks 23:8, MIN WR1/Raiders 25:10, MIN TE/Raiders 25:3, KCC rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, ATL WR2/Titans 27:14, ATL other WR/Titans 27:4, DET WR1/Panthers 28:14, DET WR2/Panthers 28:13, DET other WR/Panthers 28:15, SF WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SF rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, GBP TE/Bucs 30:17, GBP rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, BUF TE/Dolphins 31:15.

let's put it to the test for last week and this week!for week 10, you were implying that the following should have had a good outing and they did perform well:NEP TE v. Jets Det wr1 v. Bears Giants WR1 v. NinersBuf WR 2 v. DallasCincy 'other' WR v. PittAz. Other WR v. Philly ( Andre Roberts?)Dallas WR 1 v. Billsdid poorly:TB WR1 v. HouIndy WR 2 v. JagsBuf Te v. DallasMia Rec RB v. Wash.ST Louis TE v. BrownsBrowns WR 2 v. RamsOakland "other" wr v. Chargersseems like it's 50/50 with these predictions.It's hard to clarify who is the 'other' wr, or with some teams, who is WR1 and WR2.

FantasyTrader · Nov 16, 2011

'Tanner9919 said:
'FantasyTrader said:

Last week I wrote an article using Fantasy Outsiders "Defense Vs. WR Types" grid and noted the matchups vs. WR1, WR2, Other WR, Receiving RB and TE that are much better or worse than that particular defenses overall ranking. Something else to consider in conjunction with SOS.I simply went through the remainder of the NFL schedule (weeks 10-17) and identified the team and position which stands to gain/lose from the individual matchup compared to the opposition’s overall ranking. I sifted through the 32 NFL teams and took note of any positional ranking that was +/- 12 spots of that defenses overall rank. For example, under the heading “BETTER THAN ADVERTISED” in Week 10 you see NEP TE/Jets 1:29. That’s simply pointing out the fact that, while conventional start/sit recommendations would suggest a tough matchup for Tom Brady’s TE tandem of Aaron Hernandez and Rob Gronkowski this weekend against the Jets #1 ranked pass defense overall, the truth is that matchup is practically as good as it gets! (29th vs. TE)As you’re reviewing my notes below, please be mindful of the fact that, in Fantasy Outsider’s assessment of stats allowed to opposing positions, they admit their “decision of which receiver is 'number one' and which receiver is 'number two' is somewhat subjective”; clearly something to keep in mind when applying these stats to your own roster decisions.BETTER THAN ADVERTISEDWeek 10: NEP TE/Jets 1:29, TB WR1/Texans 5:30, DET WR1/Bears 6:18, IND WR2/Jaguars 7:23, NYG WR1/49ers 8:25, BUF WR2/Cowboys 9:21, BUF TE/Cowboys 9:21, MIA rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, SF other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, ARI other WR/Eagles 14:26, CLE WR2/Rams 16:31, CLE other WR/Rams 16:30, DAL WR1/Bills 17:31, OAK other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 11: DEN TE/Jets 1:29, SDC WR1/Bears 6:18, CLE WR2/Jaguars 7:23, ARI WR1/49ers 8:25, WAS WR2/Cowboys 9:21, WAS TE/Cowboys 9:21, DAL rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, PHI other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NYG other WR/Eagles 14:26, SEA WR2/Rams 16:31, SEA other WR/Rams 16:30, MIA WR1/Bills 17:31, CHI other WR/Chargers 19:32.WORSE THAN ADVERTISEDWeek 10: ARI TE/Eagles 14:1, CLE WR1/Rams 16:3, CLE TE/Rams 16:4, DAL other WR/Bills 17:2, MIN WR2/Packers 20:8, MIN other WR/Packers 20:5, DEN WR1/Chiefs 22:2, DEN other WR/Chiefs 22:9, BAL TE/Seahawks 23:8, SDC WR1/Raiders 25:10, SDC TE/Raiders 25:3, NYJ rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, CAR WR2/Titans 27:14, CAR other WR/Titans 27:4, TEN WR1/Panthers 28:14, TEN WR2/Panthers 28:13, TEN other WR/Panthers 28:15, PHI WR2/Cardinals 29:16, PHI rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, HOU TE/Bucs 30:17, HOU rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, WAS TE/Dolphins 31:15, JAC rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 11: NYG TE/Eagles 14:1, SEA WR1/ Rams 16:3, SEA TE/Rams 16:4, MIA other WR/Bills 17:2, TB WR2/Packers 20:8, TB other WR/Packers 20:5, NEP WR1/Chiefs 22:2, NEP other WR/Chiefs 22:9, STL TE/Seahawks 23:8, MIN WR1/Raiders 25:10, MIN TE/Raiders 25:3, KCC rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, ATL WR2/Titans 27:14, ATL other WR/Titans 27:4, DET WR1/Panthers 28:14, DET WR2/Panthers 28:13, DET other WR/Panthers 28:15, SF WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SF rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, GBP TE/Bucs 30:17, GBP rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, BUF TE/Dolphins 31:15.

Click to expand...

seems like it's 50/50 with these predictions.It's hard to clarify who is the 'other' wr, or with some teams, who is WR1 and WR2.

Exactly. That's the real problem is that FO's Def vs. WR Types Grid doesn't specify who they are using to analyze that production each week. For some systems, it's fairly obvious (i.e. - Jennings WR1, Nelson WR2) but for many teams it gets murky. But those numbers are more than just this guy will do well and that guy won't. It's all relative to their season averages. For instance this week Wes Welker looks like a favorable matchup with the Chiefs but a closer look reveals they're actually #2 vs opposing WR1's. But NO WAY does that imply Welker is expected to struggle or that he should be benched. It simply means the matchup isn't as good as it looks on paper. Just like last week, the Browns WR2 didn't do squat vs. a great matchup with the Rams. Well...the Browns WR2 hasn't don't anything all year. So it's probably more of a wash than an indictment against the numbers.

matuski · Nov 16, 2011

'FantasyTrader said:
Last week I wrote an article using Fantasy Outsiders "Defense Vs. WR Types" grid and noted the matchups vs. WR1, WR2, Other WR, Receiving RB and TE that are much better or worse than that particular defenses overall ranking. Something else to consider in conjunction with SOS.I simply went through the remainder of the NFL schedule (weeks 10-17) and identified the team and position which stands to gain/lose from the individual matchup compared to the opposition's overall ranking. I sifted through the 32 NFL teams and took note of any positional ranking that was +/- 12 spots of that defenses overall rank. For example, under the heading "BETTER THAN ADVERTISED" in Week 10 you see NEP TE/Jets 1:29. That's simply pointing out the fact that, while conventional start/sit recommendations would suggest a tough matchup for Tom Brady's TE tandem of Aaron Hernandez and Rob Gronkowski this weekend against the Jets #1 ranked pass defense overall, the truth is that matchup is practically as good as it gets! (29th vs. TE)As you're reviewing my notes below, please be mindful of the fact that, in Fantasy Outsider's assessment of stats allowed to opposing positions, they admit their "decision of which receiver is 'number one' and which receiver is 'number two' is somewhat subjective"; clearly something to keep in mind when applying these stats to your own roster decisions.BETTER THAN ADVERTISEDWeek 10: NEP TE/Jets 1:29, TB WR1/Texans 5:30, DET WR1/Bears 6:18, IND WR2/Jaguars 7:23, NYG WR1/49ers 8:25, BUF WR2/Cowboys 9:21, BUF TE/Cowboys 9:21, MIA rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, SF other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, ARI other WR/Eagles 14:26, CLE WR2/Rams 16:31, CLE other WR/Rams 16:30, DAL WR1/Bills 17:31, OAK other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 11: DEN TE/Jets 1:29, SDC WR1/Bears 6:18, CLE WR2/Jaguars 7:23, ARI WR1/49ers 8:25, WAS WR2/Cowboys 9:21, WAS TE/Cowboys 9:21, DAL rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, PHI other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NYG other WR/Eagles 14:26, SEA WR2/Rams 16:31, SEA other WR/Rams 16:30, MIA WR1/Bills 17:31, CHI other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 12: BUF TE/Jets 1:29, JAC WR1/Texans 5:30, OAK WR1/Bears 6:18, HOU WR2/Jaguars 7:23, BAL WR1/49ers 8:25, MIA WR2/Cowboys 9:21, MIA TE/Cowboys 9:21, SEA rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, NOS other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NEP other WR/Eagles 14:26, ARI WR2/Rams 16:31, AR other WR/Rams 16:30, NYJ WR1/Bills 17:31, DEN other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 13: WAS TE/Jets 1:29, ATL WR1/Texans 5:30, KCC WR1/Bears 6:18, SDC WR2/Jaguars 7:23, STL WR1/49ers 8:25, ARI WR2/Cowboys 9:21, ARI TE/Cowboys 9:21, NYJ rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, GBP other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, SEA other WR/Eagles 14:26, SF WR2/Rams 16:31, SF other WR/Rams 16:30, TEN WR1/Bills 17:31, JAC other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 14: KCC TE/Jets 1:29, CIN WR1/Texans 5:30, DEN WR1/ Bears 6:18, TAM WR2/Jaguars 7:23, ARI WR1/49ers 8:25, NYG WR2/Cowboys 9:21, NYG TE/Cowboys 9:21, NEP rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, DAL other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, MIA other WR/Eagles 14:26, SEA WR2/Rams 16:31, SEA other WR/Rams 16:30, SDC WR1/Bills 17:31, BUF other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 15: PHI TE/Jets 1:29, CAR WR1/Texans 5:30, SEA WR1/Bears 6:18, ATL WR2/Jaguars 7:23, PIT WR1/49ers 8:25, TAM WR2/Cowboys 9:21, TAM TE/Cowboys 9:21, NYG rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, WAS other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, NYJ other WR/Eagles 14:26, CIN WR2/Rams 16:31, CIN other WR/Rams 16:30, MIA WR1/Bills 17:31, BAL other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 16: NYG TE/Jets 1:29, IND WR1/Texans 5:30, GBP WR1/Bears 6:18, TEN WR2/Jaguars 7:23, SEA WR1/49ers 8:25, PHI WR2/Cowboys 9:21, PHI TE/Cowboys 9:21, MIN rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, NYJ other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, DAL other WR/Eagles 14:26, PIT WR2/Rams 16:31, PIT other WR/Rams 16:30, DEN WR1/Bills 17:31, DET other WR/Chargers 19:32.Week 17: MIA TE/Jets 1:29, TEN WR1/Texans 5:30, MIN WR1/Bears 6:18, IND WR2/Jaguars 7:23, STL WR1/49ers 8:25, NYG WR2/Cowboys 9:21, NYG TE/Cowboys 9:21, PHI rec. RB/Redskins 10:31, DAL other WR/Giants 11:28, STL TE/Browns 12:28, CIN other WR/Steelers 13:29, WAS other WR/Eagles 14:26, SF WR2/Rams 16:31, SF other WR/Rams 16:30, NEP WR1/Bills 17:31, OAK other WR/Chargers 19:32.To reiterate, the following are what are widely considered to be mediocre to poor overall NFL defenses that present a bad matchup for the preceding position/team by week. For example, under week 10 you see (SDC TE/Raiders 25:3) the Raiders are ranked 25th overall vs. the pass, however - on paper - they present a very difficult matchup for Antonio Gates (3rd vs. TE).WORSE THAN ADVERTISEDWeek 10: ARI TE/Eagles 14:1, CLE WR1/Rams 16:3, CLE TE/Rams 16:4, DAL other WR/Bills 17:2, MIN WR2/Packers 20:8, MIN other WR/Packers 20:5, DEN WR1/Chiefs 22:2, DEN other WR/Chiefs 22:9, BAL TE/Seahawks 23:8, SDC WR1/Raiders 25:10, SDC TE/Raiders 25:3, NYJ rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, CAR WR2/Titans 27:14, CAR other WR/Titans 27:4, TEN WR1/Panthers 28:14, TEN WR2/Panthers 28:13, TEN other WR/Panthers 28:15, PHI WR2/Cardinals 29:16, PHI rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, HOU TE/Bucs 30:17, HOU rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, WAS TE/Dolphins 31:15, JAC rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 11: NYG TE/Eagles 14:1, SEA WR1/ Rams 16:3, SEA TE/Rams 16:4, MIA other WR/Bills 17:2, TB WR2/Packers 20:8, TB other WR/Packers 20:5, NEP WR1/Chiefs 22:2, NEP other WR/Chiefs 22:9, STL TE/Seahawks 23:8, MIN WR1/Raiders 25:10, MIN TE/Raiders 25:3, KCC rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, ATL WR2/Titans 27:14, ATL other WR/Titans 27:4, DET WR1/Panthers 28:14, DET WR2/Panthers 28:13, DET other WR/Panthers 28:15, SF WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SF rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, GBP TE/Bucs 30:17, GBP rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, BUF TE/Dolphins 31:15.Week 12: NEP TE/Eagles 14:1, ARI WR1/Rams 16:3, ARI TE/Rams 16:4, NYJ other WR/Bills 17:2, DET WR 2/Packers 20:8, DET other WR/Packers 20:5, PIT WR1/Chiefs 22:2, PIT other WR/Chiefs 22:9, WAS TE/Seahawks 23:8, CHI WR1/Raiders 25:10, CHI TE/Raiders 25:3, PHI rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, TB WR2/Titans 27:14, TB other WR/Titans 27:4, IND WR1/Panthers 28:14, IND WR2/Panthers 28:13, IND other WR/Panthers 28:15, STL WR2/Cardinals 29:16, STL rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, TEN TE/Bucs 30:17, TEN rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, DAL TE/Dolphins 31:15, CAR rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 13: SEA TE/Eagles 14:1, SF WR1/Rams 16:3, SF TE/Rams 16:4, TEN other WR/Bills 17:2, NYG WR2/Packers 20:8, NYG other WR/Packers 20:5, CHI WR1/Chiefs 22:2, CHI other WR/Chiefs 22:9, PHI TE/Seahawks 23:8, MIA WR1/Raiders 25:10, MIA TE/Raiders 25:3, IND rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, BUF WR2/Titans 27:14, BUF other WR/Titans 27:4, TB WR1/Panthers 28:14, TBWR2/Panthers 28:13, TB other WR/Panthers 28:15, DAL WR2/Cardinals 29:16, DAL rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, CAR TE/Bucs 30:17, CAR rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, OAK TE/Dolphins 31:15, NEP rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 14: MIA TE/Eagles 14:1, SEA WR1/Rams 16:3, SEA TE/Rams 16:4, SDC other WR/Bills 17:2, OAK WR2/Packers 20:8, OAK other WR/Packers 20:5, NYJ WR1/Chiefs 22:2, NYJ other WR/Chiefs 22:9, STL TE/Seahawks 23:8, GBP WR1/Raiders 25:10, GBP TE/Raiders 25:3, WAS rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, NOS WR2/Titans 27:14, NOS other WR/Titans 27:4, ATL WR1/Panthers 28:14, ATL WR2/Panthers 28:13, ATL other WR/Panthers 28:15, SF WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SF rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, JAC TE/Bucs 30:17, JAC rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, PHI TE/Dolphins 31:15, BAL rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 15: NYJ TE/Eagles 14:1, CIN WR1/Rams 16:3, CIN TE/Rams 16:4, MIA other WR/Bills 17:2, KC WR2/Packers 20:8, KC other WR/Packers 20:5, GBP WR1/Chiefs 22:2, GBP other WR/Chiefs 22:9, CHI TE/Seahawks 23:8, DET WR1/Raiders 25:10, DET TE/Raiders 25:3, DEN rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, IND WR2/Titans 27:14, IND other WR/Titans 27:4, HOU WR1/Panthers 28:14, HOU WR2/Panthers 28:13, HOU other WR/Panthers 28:15, CLE WR2/Cardinals 29:16, CLE rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, DAL TE/Bucs 30:17, DAL rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, BUF TE/Dolphins 31:15, TEN rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 16: DAL TE/Eagles 14:1, PIT WR1/Rams 16:3, PIT TE/Rams 16:4, DEN other WR/Bills 17:2, CHI WR2/Packers 20:8, CHI other WR/Packers 20:5, OAK WR1/Chiefs 22:2, OAK other WR/Chiefs 22:9, SF TE/Seahawks 23:8, KCC WR1/Raiders 25:10, KCC TE/Raiders 25:3, MIA rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, JAC WR2/Titans 27:14, JAC other WR/Titans 27:4, TB WR1/Panthers 28:14, TB WR2/Panthers 28:13, TB other WR/Panthers 28:15, CIN WR2/Cardinals 29:16, CIN rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, CAR TE/Bucs 30:17, CAR rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, NEP TE/Dolphins 31:15, HOU rec. RB/Colts 32:14.Week 17: WAS TE/Eagles 14:1, SF WR1/Rams 16:3, SF TE/Rams 16:4, NEP other WR/Bills 17:2, DET WR2/Packers 20:8, DET other WR/Packers 20:5, DEN WR1/Chiefs 22:2, DEN other WR/Chiefs 22:9, ARI TE/Seahawks 23:8, SDC WR1/Raiders 25:10, SDC TE/Raiders 25:3, BUF rec. RB/Patriots 26:11, HOU WR2/Titans 27:14, HOU other WR/Titans 27:4, NOS WR1/Panthers 28:14, NOS WR2/Panthers 28:13, NOS other WR/Panthers 28:15, SEA WR2/Cardinals 29:16, SEA rec. RB/Cardinals 29:3, ATL TE/Bucs 30:17, ATL rec. RB/Bucs 30:9, NYJ TE/Dolphins 31:15, JAC rec. RB/Colts 32:14.

David Yudkin · Nov 29, 2011

Through 11 games . . .

Code:

WAS	1	10	3	14	NE, NYG, MINMIA	6	14	1	21	PHI, BUF, NEDAL	10	12	6	28	NYG, TB, PHIDEN	21	1	14	36	CHI, NE, BUFCHI	11	20	5	36	DEN, SEA, GBDET	3	16	18	37	MIN, OAK, SDTEN	4	2	31	37	NO, IND, JAXNYJ	22	6	10	38	KC, PHI, NYGNO	29	3	8	40	TEN, MIN, ATLBUF	18	13	11	42	SD, MIA, DENSEA	7	21	15	43	STL, CHI, SFHOU	17	25	2	44	CIN, CAR, INDCIN	28	7	9	44	HOU, STL, ARIKC	27	5	16	48	NYJ, GB, OAKCAR	8	28	12	48	ATL, HOU, TBJAC	12	8	29	49	TB, ATL, TENNE	26	11	13	50	WAS, DEN, MIAOAK	5	24	22	51	GB, DET, KCBAL	2	18	32	52	IND, SD, CLEPIT	32	15	7	54	CLE, SF, STLMIN	24	4	26	54	DET, NO, WASGB	16	22	21	59	OAK, KC, CHISF	9	30	20	59	ARI, PIT, SEAPHI	13	27	19	59	MIA, NYJ, DALATL	25	31	4	60	CAR, JAX, NOSD	14	23	24	61	BUF, BAL, DETCLE	30	9	23	62	PIT, ARI, BALARI	15	32	17	64	SF, CLE, CINSTL	20	17	30	67	SEA, CIN, PITNYG	19	26	27	72	DAL, WAS, NYJTB	31	19	25	75	JAX, DAL, CARIND	23	29	28	80	BAL, TEN, HOU

Horses Mouth · Nov 30, 2011

Santana Moss and Gaffney look like they have potential down the stretch. I love these threads.

killrobotkill · Nov 30, 2011

'Horses Mouth said:
Santana Moss and Gaffney look like they have potential down the stretch. I love these threads.

Davone Bess might also be worth a look. Odds are that he's on the waiver wire in a bunch of shallow leagues.

Islanders rule · Nov 30, 2011

bump

HULLOBUDMAN · Nov 30, 2011

I liked this information but the huge change in the rankings may reduce the validity of the rankings in my opinion.

How did NE go from the 6th best matchup to the 17th best matchup over the course of two weeks? Are the rankings so close that these numbers don't mean that much? Would a total fantasy points allowed per team they are facing be more of an accurate portrayal?

David Yudkin · Nov 30, 2011

'HULLOBUDMAN said:
I liked this information but the huge change in the rankings may reduce the validity of the rankings in my opinion. How did NE go from the 6th best matchup to the 17th best matchup over the course of two weeks? Are the rankings so close that these numbers don't mean that much? Would a total fantasy points allowed per team they are facing be more of an accurate portrayal?

Ask and you shall receive . . .

Code:

WAS	27.58	23.05	24.78	75.41	NE, NYG, MINMIA	24.4	22.14	27.58	74.12	PHI, BUF, NEDAL	23.05	22.44	24.4	69.89	NYG, TB, PHIDEN	19.8	27.58	22.14	69.52	CHI, NE, BUFTEN	24.67	25.17	18.98	68.82	NO, IND, JAXCHI	23.01	19.86	24.57	67.44	DEN, SEA, GBNYJ	19.8	24.4	23.05	67.25	KC, PHI, NYGDET	24.78	21.53	20.45	66.76	MIN, OAK, SDBUF	20.45	22.39	23.01	65.85	SD, MIA, DENHOU	21.15	18.98	25.17	65.3	CIN, CAR, INDSEA	23.74	19.8	21.58	65.12	STL, CHI, SFNO	16.75	24.78	23.34	64.87	TEN, MIN, ATLCIN	17.75	23.74	23.25	64.74	HOU, STL, ARIKC	18.03	24.57	21.53	64.13	NYJ, GB, OAKOAK	24.57	19.38	19.8	63.75	GB, DET, KCCAR	23.34	17.75	22.44	63.53	ATL, HOU, TBNE	18.03	23.01	22.39	63.43	WAS, DEN, MIAJAC	22.44	23.34	16.75	62.53	TB, ATL, TENMIN	19.38	24.67	18.03	62.08	DET, NO, WASGB	21.53	19.8	19.8	61.13	OAK, KC, CHISD	22.14	19.47	19.38	60.99	BUF, BAL, DETPHI	22.39	18.03	19.98	60.4	MIA, NYJ, DALSF	23.25	15.57	19.86	58.68	ARI, PIT, SEAATL	18.98	14.83	24.67	58.48	CAR, JAX, NOBAL	25.17	20.45	12.81	58.43	IND, SD, CLECLE	15.57	23.25	19.47	58.29	PIT, ARI, BALPIT	12.81	21.58	23.74	58.13	CLE, SF, STLSTL	19.86	21.15	15.57	56.58	SEA, CIN, PITNYG	19.98	18.03	18.03	56.04	DAL, WAS, NYJARI	21.58	12.81	21.15	55.54	SF, CLE, CININD	19.47	16.75	17.75	53.97	BAL, TEN, HOUTB	14.83	19.98	18.98	53.79	JAX, DAL, CAR

Tibereas · Dec 1, 2011

David Yudkin · Dec 6, 2011

Updated through Week 13:

Code:

WAS	28.58	24.47	25.28	78.33	NE, NYG, MINMIA	23.73	21.22	28.58	73.53	PHI, BUF, NEDAL	24.47	22.33	23.73	70.53	NYG, TB, PHICHI	24.62	19.40	25.33	69.35	DEN, SEA, GBDEN	19.05	28.58	21.22	68.85	CHI, NE, BUFBUF	19.58	23.05	24.62	67.25	SD, MIA, DENNYJ	18.93	23.73	24.47	67.13	KC, PHI, NYGNE	18.58	24.62	23.05	66.25	WAS, DEN, MIACIN	17.48	24.92	23.60	66.00	HOU, STL, ARIDET	25.28	21.07	19.58	65.93	MIN, OAK, SDTEN	24.46	24.48	16.82	65.76	NO, IND, JAXSEA	24.92	19.05	20.79	64.76	STL, CHI, SFOAK	25.33	20.47	18.93	64.73	GB, DET, KCNO	16.93	25.28	22.30	64.51	TEN, MIN, ATLHOU	20.13	19.32	24.48	63.93	CIN, CAR, INDKC	17.17	25.33	21.07	63.57	NYJ, GB, OAKMIN	20.47	24.46	18.58	63.51	DET, NO, WASCAR	22.30	17.48	22.33	62.11	ATL, HOU, TBJAC	22.33	22.30	16.93	61.56	TB, ATL, TENATL	19.32	16.82	24.46	60.60	CAR, JAX, NOPHI	23.05	17.17	19.70	59.92	MIA, NYJ, DALSD	21.22	17.78	20.47	59.47	BUF, BAL, DETGB	21.07	18.93	19.05	59.05	OAK, KC, CHISF	23.60	14.87	19.40	57.87	ARI, PIT, SEAPIT	11.84	20.79	24.92	57.55	CLE, SF, STLCLE	14.87	23.60	17.78	56.25	PIT, ARI, BALBAL	24.48	19.58	11.84	55.90	IND, SD, CLETB	16.82	19.70	19.32	55.84	JAX, DAL, CARNYG	19.70	18.58	17.17	55.45	DAL, WAS, NYJSTL	19.40	20.13	14.87	54.40	SEA, CIN, PITARI	20.79	11.84	20.13	52.76	SF, CLE, CININD	17.78	16.93	17.48	52.19	BAL, TEN, HOU

David Yudkin · Dec 6, 2011

Top 60 WR based on ppg over past 5 weeks (0 ppr). (No regard to number of games played or injury status.)

Code:

Harvin, Percy MIN WR	17.125Floyd, Malcom SDC WR	16.8Cruz, Victor NYG WR	15.18Jackson, Vincent SDC WR	14.5Nelson, Jordy GBP WR	14.22Robinson, L DAL WR	13Nicks, Hakeem NYG WR	11.625Fitzgerald, L ARI WR	11.6White, Roddy ATL WR	11.52Green, A.J. CIN WR	11.45Welker, Wes NEP WR	11.06Moore, Denarius OAK WR	10.6Ford, Jacoby OAK WR	10.3Bryant, Dez DAL WR	10.18Jennings, Greg GBP WR	9.84Marshall, B MIA WR	9.84Lloyd, Brandon STL WR	9.66Garcon, Pierre IND WR	9.4Wallace, Mike PIT WR	9.375Williams, Mike TBB WR	9.18Moore, Lance NOS WR	9.125Smith, Torrey BAL WR	9.04Jones, Julio ATL WR 	9.025Holmes, Santonio NYJ WR	8.98Knox, Johnny CHI WR	8.94Brown, Antonio PIT WR	8.925Burleson, Nate DET WR	8.725Williams, Damian TEN WR	8.64Johnson, Calvin DET WR	8.45Crabtree, M SFO WR	8.04Meachem, Robert NOS WR	7.9Manningham, M NYG WR	7.8Burress, P NYJ WR	7.78Gaffney, Jabar WAS WR	7.68Brown, Vincent SDC WR 	7.52Decker, Eric DEN WR	7.46Colston, Marques NOS WR	7.425Washington, Nate TEN WR	7.14Johnson, Steve BUF WR	7.1Hankerson, L WAS WR	7Wayne, Reggie IND WR	7Douglas, Harry ATL WR	6.7Little, Greg CLE WR	6.68Thomas, D DEN WR	6.6Nelson, David BUF WR	6.56Bennett, Earl CHI WR	6.42Branch, Deion NEP WR	6.4Bowe, Dwayne KCC WR	6.2Smith, Steve CAR WR	6.2Breaston, Steve KCC WR	6.12Naanee, Legedu CAR WR	6.112Boldin, Anquan BAL WR	6Cooper, Riley PHI WR	6Roberts, Andre ARI WR	5.96Johnson, Andre HOU WR	5.95Driver, Donald GBP WR	5.9Salas, Greg STL WR	5.9Williams, Kyle SFO WR	5.82Young, Titus DET WR	5.8Jackson, DeSean PHI WR	5.4

David Yudkin · Dec 6, 2011

Same deal. Top 60 based on ppg average over the past 5 weeks (1 ppr). No regard to games played or injury status.

Code:

Harvin, Percy MIN WR		24.125Cruz, Victor NYG WR		21.98Floyd, Malcom SDC WR		20.8Nelson, Jordy GBP WR		19.02Jackson, Vincent SDC WR		18.7Welker, Wes NEP WR		18.26Robinson, Laurent DAL WR	17.6White, Roddy ATL WR		17.32Nicks, Hakeem NYG WR		16.375Fitzgerald, Larry ARI WR	15.8Green, A.J. CIN WR		15.7Burleson, Nate DET WR		15.225Bryant, Dez DAL WR		15.18Marshall, Brandon MIA WR	14.84Williams, Mike TBB WR		14.58Jennings, Greg GBP WR		14.44Johnson, Calvin DET WR		14.2Hankerson, Leonard WAS WR	14Moore, Denarius OAK WR		13.933Garcon, Pierre IND WR		13.9Lloyd, Brandon STL WR		13.66Wallace, Mike PIT WR		13.375Ford, Jacoby OAK WR		13.3Crabtree, Michael SFO WR	13.04Brown, Antonio PIT WR		12.925Colston, Marques NOS WR		12.925Salas, Greg STL WR		12.9Holmes, Santonio NYJ WR		12.78Smith, Torrey BAL WR		12.44Williams, Damian TEN WR		12.04Moore, Lance NOS WR		11.875Knox, Johnny CHI WR		11.74Burress, Plaxico NYJ WR		11.58Gaffney, Jabar WAS WR		11.48Bowe, Dwayne KCC WR		11.4Breaston, Steve KCC WR		11.32Jones, Julio ATL WR		11.275Wayne, Reggie IND WR		11.25Washington, Nate TEN WR		11.14Manningham, Mario NYG WR	11.133Johnson, Steve BUF WR		11.1Little, Greg CLE WR		10.88Smith, Steve CAR WR		10.45Brown, Vincent SDC WR		10.32Douglas, Harry ATL WR		10.3Naanee, Legedu CAR WR		10.045Branch, Deion NEP WR		10Nelson, David BUF WR		9.96Roberts, Andre ARI WR		9.96Jackson, DeSean PHI WR		9.65Bennett, Earl CHI WR		9.62Young, Titus DET WR		9.3Decker, Eric DEN WR		9.26Boldin, Anquan BAL WR		9.2Meachem, Robert NOS WR		9.15Johnson, Andre HOU WR		8.95Driver, Donald GBP WR		8.7Cooper, Riley PHI WR		8.6Collie, Austin IND WR		8.525Moss, Santana WAS WR		8.05

SaintsInDome2006 · Dec 7, 2011

Moss has not done blip since coming off the injured list but, New England has given up ridiculous numbers to Garcon and Avant the last weeks. I am kind of put out I did not start Garcon last week.

Marshall 13/7/139/0

VJax 15/10/172/2

Stevie J 10/8/94/1

Donald Jones 5/101/1

DHB 7/4/115/0

Santonio 6/4/60/1

Antonio Brown 15/9/67/1

Cruz 11/6/91/0

Santonio 8/6/93/0

Bowe (w/ Palko!) 9/7/87/0

Avant 14/8/110/1

Garcon 12/9/150/2

Every team but KC with Palko and Dallas scored a WR TD on them.

Fred Davis' targets (13 last week) have to go somewhere.

Anyone see a start for Moss here?

Irish Catholic · Dec 7, 2011

I think Moss is a must start in almost any league; on my team I rate him as my best WR this week over Brandon Lloyd (v. Sea) and A. Boldin (v. Indi).

Hipple Long Ware & Peete · Dec 7, 2011

Looking ahead to next week and the week after only. A few guys I am debating

Brad smith, Devin Aromishadu, Davone Bess and Demaryius thomas.

before you laugh all have really nice schedules and should be behind in games or in shootouts (as MIA plays BUF one of those weeks)

Demariyus plays the Pats next week and I have to imagine they will need to throw to stay in that one.

Irish Catholic · Dec 7, 2011

Demaryius Thomas is a risky play because you never know if Tebow is even going to throw the ball, much less to whom he is going to throw it.

Hank Mardukas · Dec 7, 2011

'SaintsInDome2006 said:
Moss has not done blip since coming off the injured list but, New England has given up ridiculous numbers to Garcon and Avant the last weeks. I am kind of put out I did not start Garcon last week.Marshall 13/7/139/0VJax 15/10/172/2Stevie J 10/8/94/1Donald Jones 5/101/1DHB 7/4/115/0Santonio 6/4/60/1Antonio Brown 15/9/67/1Cruz 11/6/91/0Santonio 8/6/93/0Bowe (w/ Palko!) 9/7/87/0Avant 14/8/110/1Garcon 12/9/150/2Every team but KC with Palko and Dallas scored a WR TD on them.Fred Davis' targets (13 last week) have to go somewhere.Anyone see a start for Moss here?

I'm in a must win situation for one of 4 playoff spots and am seriously considering going with Gaffney. My hope is that Moss gets some extra attention and Gaffney benefits. Regardless, I think both Moss and Gaffney are good plays this week.

Hipple Long Ware & Peete · Dec 7, 2011

'Irish Catholic said:
Demaryius Thomas is a risky play because you never know if Tebow is even going to throw the ball, much less to whom he is going to throw it.

true, you could get 2 pts you could get 20. But if Denver is to stay in te game with the Pats on any level, they are gonna need to score points (and many from 2tds+ behind I believe) It's boom/bust for sure, but I think the boom is more likely.

Grahamburn · Dec 8, 2011

Wow. Cleveland is far and away the best defense against WRs. I've looked at the WRs they've faced, and there really aren't any special ones, but those are some gaudy numbers.

Is their secondary really that good, or do teams just decide to ram it down their throat running the football? I guess I'll check out the game tonight to see how they fare against Wallace, Brown, and Big Ben.

Signed,

Concerned Larry Fitzgerald owner with a bye week.

David Yudkin · Dec 15, 2011

Through Week 14. 0 PPR.

Code:

DEN	30.42	20.98	51.4	NE, BUFMIA	20.98	30.42	51.4	BUF, NEWAS	25.94	24.98	50.92	NYG, MINNYJ	22.78	25.94	48.72	PHI, NYGCIN	24.85	22.75	47.6	STL, ARIPIT	22.35	24.85	47.2	SF, STLNO	24.98	22.02	47	MIN, ATLKC	24.7	21.78	46.48	GB, OAKBUF	22.73	23.18	45.91	MIA, DENNE	23.18	22.73	45.91	DEN, MIAHOU	20.76	24.01	44.77	CAR, INDDAL	21.17	22.78	43.95	TB, PHICHI	18.73	24.7	43.43	SEA, GBMIN	24.55	18.45	43	NO, WASSEA	19.52	22.35	41.87	CHI, SFTB	20.95	20.76	41.71	DAL, CARDET	21.78	19.34	41.12	OAK, SDATL	16.08	24.55	40.63	JAX, NOTEN	24.01	16.08	40.09	IND, JAXJAC	22.02	17.85	39.87	ATL, TENCLE	22.75	17.07	39.82	ARI, BALOAK	20.79	18.12	38.91	DET, KCCAR	17.62	21.17	38.79	HOU, TBPHI	17.66	20.95	38.61	NYJ, DALSD	17.07	20.79	37.86	BAL, DETGB	18.12	19.52	37.64	KC, CHINYG	18.45	17.66	36.11	WAS, NYJIND	17.85	17.62	35.47	TEN, HOUSTL	19.93	14.45	34.38	CIN, PITARI	13.84	19.93	33.77	CLE, CINSF	14.45	18.73	33.18	PIT, SEABAL	19.34	13.84	33.18	SD, CLE

Best Fantasy Schedules for WR (1 Viewer)

Footballguy

Footballguy

sucker for Orange

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

sucker for Orange

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Footballguy

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread