What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

DYNASTY: Top 2013 College Prospects (1 Viewer)

Disagree about his speed, his feet and vision are his assets and the next time I see him create a play from nothing will be the first time.
What point in the game was that, so I can look at the gamelog? And if destroying ND and UGA isn't enough - what is? You made claims early against Lacy and won't come off of them despite Lacy answering any objective question you can have about him.

 
Disagree about his speed, his feet and vision are his assets and the next time I see him create a play from nothing will be the first time.
I felt better about Martin because of his creative play making ability and shiftiness.Ingram and Mendenhall are better comparisons. Lacy is just as overly reliant on the spin move as Mendenhall. Saw more in the passing game from Ingram too, not a lot but enough pass pro to make me more comfortable he could translate. Not sure what happened to pass catching in the NFL, crossing my fingers that changes with Payton coming back as I bought low in November.

Lynch showed levels of power in the college game I haven't seen from the others, I think that's a good separating factor.

 
2013 NFL Draft: BCS Title Game observationsBy Rob Rang | The Sports Xchange/CBSSports.comJanuary 7, 2013 9:35 pm ET
With all due respect to Nick Saban and Brian Kelly, the BCS title game was decided by the talent on the field, not the coaches pacing the sidelines. Each team earned their berth in this contest due to the presence of numerous highly rated NFL prospects, which is why scouts were tuning in long after the 42-14 final seemed assured.As such, from an NFL talent evaluator's perspective, the BCS title game was as good as it gets, boasting not only elite talent but the one-on-one matchups in a high pressure situation that scouts normally can only dream about.One of the more fascinating one on one matchups of the game played a critical role early as Alabama cornerback Dee Milliner was able to successfully defend two long throws up the left sideline operating against Notre Dame's Tyler Eifert, the reigning Mackey Award winner as the nation's top tight end.The 6-5, 252-pound Eifert had a significant size advantage over the 6-1, 198-pound Milliner and, in each case, demonstrated his rare body control and hand-eye coordination in successfully snatching the ball out of the air on Notre Dame's first drive. Both times, however, Milliner's length and positioning forced the big tight end out of bounds, showcasing the poise to handle being targeted.While Notre Dame's best pass-catcher was struggling to control the ball, Alabama, on the other hand, was simply manhandling the Irish defensive front.The Crimson Tide feature three potential 2013 first-round picks in left guard Chance Warmack, center Barrett Jones and right tackle D.J. Fluker. Jones and Warmack were especially active early, releasing to pick off Notre Dame's all-galaxy inside linebacker Manti Te'o among others as the Tide rushed to a 21-0 lead after Alabama's first three possessions.Possessing surprising quickness to go along with power as a drive blocker, Warmack, NFLDraftScout.com's highest-rated senior from Alabama, was consistently able to get to the second level, providing easy running lanes for junior Eddie Lacy and freshman T.J. Yeldon to exploit. Jones was also up to the task, showcasing the use of leverage and quickness to handle the bull rush from behemoth Notre Dame nose guard Louis Nix III and the short-area quickness to adjust in space and block the Irish's linebackers at the second level.Lacy, showing off his underrated combination of power, burst and trademark spin move, slipped through the overmatched Irish defense early, averaging an eye-popping 9.0 yards per carry over Alabama's first three drives. Lacy rushed for 140 yards, scoring two touchdowns.Having averaged 6.4 yards per carry on his way towards 1,182 yards and 16 touchdowns against tough SEC competition this season, Lacy's success wasn't unexpected. After all, the junior ranks second on NFLDraftScout.com's list of the top backs potentially available in the 2013 draft.The most significant impact from the game, in fact, could be the detrimental role that it plays on Te'o's draft stock. The inspiration that helped spark Notre Dame's ascension back into national prominence, Te'o has earned more recognition than even Johnny Manziel, the first freshman to win the Heisman.The winner of the Butkus Award as the nation's elite linebacker and the Nagurski Award as the nation's top defender, Te'o won seven individual honors this season. Yet his inability to make open-field tackles under the brighest of lights could send his stock tumbling with precious little time for it to recover.Savvy talent evaluators certainly won't overreact to one poor performance. But make no mistake, struggles in a game this big -- against a well-coached, pro-style offense with speed -- will have an adverse effect on Te'o. The 6-2, 255-pound linebacker had boosted his stock this season by providing an emphatic answer to concerns about his ability in coverage, notching seven interceptions. Despite his gaudy production as a tackler (103 tackles) and interceptor, talent evaluators still worried if he had the sideline-to-sideline speed necessary in today's NFL. Beaten to the edge and slipping off Alabama's running backs repeatedly, Te'o failed to provide the rock in the middle that the Irish faithful had come to rely on all season long. And with less than ideal speed, Te'o isn't expected to work out well -- at least not as well as Georgia's Alec Ogletree and LSU's Kevin Minter, two highly productive, highly athletic SEC linebackers who ended their respective careers with eye-popping performances in their bowl games.The dominating play of the Alabama offensive line kept quarterback AJ McCarron from getting the acknowledgement that he likely deserves in helping guide the Tide to their second consecutive title. While perhaps lacking the eye-popping arm strength or mobility to wow talent evaluators, McCarron once again demonstrated the poise and accuracy to project nicely at the second level, tossing four touchdowns and no interceptions. Having already announced his intentions to return for his senior season, McCarron will look to build upon a 2012 season in which he led the country in passing efficiency.If there was a bright spot for the Irish, it might have been the impressive play of sophomore wideout DaVaris Daniels. The 6-2, 190-pounder demonstrated soft hands, nimble feet and the quick acceleration to turn short receptions into long gains. Daniels, who entered the game having caught "just" 25 passes for 375 yards during the season, enjoyed a bit of a breakout performance hauling in six receptions for a career-high 115 yards.
 
Disagree about his speed, his feet and vision are his assets and the next time I see him create a play from nothing will be the first time.
Of course he did. But he made plays. He broke tackles, he make people miss, he ripped 40+ yard runs against an UGA defense that will litter the first 3 rounds of the NFL draft. I'm not even talking about his raw stats - I haven't brought them up once. Just watching what he did with the football - he was awesome.
 
Disagree about his speed, his feet and vision are his assets and the next time I see him create a play from nothing will be the first time.
I want to say mid 3rd quarter, may have been earlier.I'd probably have less questions if he played behind a worse o line. He didn't HAVE to do things to consistently gain yards that he will have to do in the NFL. Unfair? Yeah, a bit, but the game tape doesn't lie. He knew he had the holes, just follow the blue print and look for creases to get extra yards then envoke the spin move when able to. He's not going to have those holes in the NFL and will either have to veer from the blue print or be more physical between the tackles. He hasn't shown he can do either - not saying he can't, saying he hasn't. A variable that must be considered.

I feel more comfortable with Gillislee because I think they have similar games, but I have seen enough from Gillislee in the pass game to feel comfortable about him having a meaningful role in the NFL. He could just be an alright runner too, but if he plays a heavy role on the passing game that's fantasy starter material in the right situation.

 
There are more and more people posting game videos on Youtube which show every carry & target that a player had for the game.

http://www.youtube.com/user/xuesac84/videos?flow=grid&view=0

http://www.youtube.com/user/JMPasq/videos?view=0

http://www.youtube.com/user/MetaDraft?feature=watch

http://www.youtube.com/user/JPDraftJedi/videos?flow=grid&view=0

http://www.youtube.com/user/ssekyung7?feature=watch

For Lacy, you can see his games this year against

.I've been watching a lot of those videos over the past week or two. For missed & broken tackles, and yards after contact, the three guys that have stood out to me are Lacy, Gio Bernard, and Johnathan Franklin (with Lacy in front).

 
I want to say mid 3rd quarter, may have been earlier.I'd probably have less questions if he played behind a worse o line. He didn't HAVE to do things to consistently gain yards that he will have to do in the NFL. Unfair? Yeah, a bit, but the game tape doesn't lie. He knew he had the holes, just follow the blue print and look for creases to get extra yards then envoke the spin move when able to. He's not going to have those holes in the NFL and will either have to veer from the blue print or be more physical between the tackles. He hasn't shown he can do either - not saying he can't, saying he hasn't. A variable that must be considered.I feel more comfortable with Gillislee because I think they have similar games, but I have seen enough from Gillislee in the pass game to feel comfortable about him having a meaningful role in the NFL. He could just be an alright runner too, but if he plays a heavy role on the passing game that's fantasy starter material in the right situation.
Die hard Florida fan who watched Gilly play in person: "That is crazy". Gillislee isn't close to the prospect Lacy is and they are not too similar as players. Gilly doesn't have the power/speed ratio, nor the footwork of Lacy (and that is saying something as he is a good deal smaller). He didn't make people miss or run them over. He did a great job of feeling holes and is pretty instinctive. Tashard Choice-like. Trent Richardson had a great line last year - should we have written his production off? Just look at what Lacy did after initial contact - that translates.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Richardson showed special qualities in the passing game and creativity when the play wasn't there on top of everything else Lacy does well, big difference between them imho.Just bringing up Gillislee for a current year comp. Gillislee has a special quality, ability in the passing game. NFL is becoming more of a passing league, so I feel comfortable he finds a big role. As a pure runner, I don't think he's anything special, but he's functional. Mix strong passing skills with functional running abilities and you have something good.

 
Franklin's a guy not being talked about much now that I think will change over the next few months. He has those Gillislee like tendencies in the passing game, BUT he's also shown power and agility in the run game too. Hoping he doesn't get too big of a bandwagon, so if he goes to a nice spot he's there in the 2nd part of round 1 when I'm drafting.
 
Richardson showed special qualities in the passing game and creativity when the play wasn't there on top of everything else Lacy does well, big difference between them imho.Just bringing up Gillislee for a current year comp. Gillislee has a special quality, ability in the passing game. NFL is becoming more of a passing league, so I feel comfortable he finds a big role. As a pure runner, I don't think he's anything special, but he's functional. Mix strong passing skills with functional running abilities and you have something good.
Gillislee played for a team whose staff didn't trust their QB. That's the reason for his raw receiving stats. There was nothing special about him in the passing game, at all. He is not going to have a role in the NFL as a specialist. In my personal opinion, he is VERY reliant on situation. Could be a nice back up, but I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't stick in the league. And again, I'm a big Florida fan and have every reason to pull for him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Disagree about his speed, his feet and vision are his assets and the next time I see him create a play from nothing will be the first time.
Lacy might be the real deal but I not buying in just yet. It has something to do with how good the 2005 USC offense made Lendale White look. If he performs at the combine I may be convinced.(I'm not sure why I am even posting. I doubt I will be drafting in any dynasty leagues this year)

 
LenWhale isn't a fair comparison imho, he failed because he was doughy, slow in and out of his cuts, and had a poor work ethic. Don't know yay or nay about Lacy's work ethic, but he's not doughy and not slow in and out of his cuts. I think he takes an extra step to really get going after he pops out of his cuts too often but it's still quicker than LenWhale.

 
LenWhale isn't a fair comparison imho, he failed because he was doughy, slow in and out of his cuts, and had a poor work ethic. Don't know yay or nay about Lacy's work ethic, but he's not doughy and not slow in and out of his cuts. I think he takes an extra step to really get going after he pops out of his cuts too often but it's still quicker than LenWhale.
Not really comparing the players as much as I was comparing the two teams domination on the oline. I agree that Lacy is a far better athlete than LenDale. I will admit that I am biased. I never liked big backs. I usually avoid them at all costs and most of the time I don't regret it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Disagree about his speed, his feet and vision are his assets and the next time I see him create a play from nothing will be the first time.
Here's Lacy's stats against Georgia by quarter:1st quarter: 3 rushes, 21 yards (7.0 avg)

2nd quarter: 6 rushes, 69 yards (11.5 avg), 1 TD

3rd quarter: 8 rushes, 86 yards (10.8 avg)

4th quarter: 3 rushes, 5 yards (1.7 avg), 1 TD

Looks like he was having success from the get-go to me.

And what is it about Gillislee's receiving game that makes you confident he will succeed in that role in the NFL, whereas you aren't similarly as confident about Lacy despite Lacy having considerably more receptions and a considerably better yards-per-reception than Gillislee in their respective NCAA careers?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And what is it about Gillislee's receiving game that makes you confident he will succeed in that role in the NFL, whereas you aren't similarly as confident about Lacy despite Lacy having considerably more receptions and a considerably better yards-per-reception than Gillislee in their respective NCAA careers?
Really don't think you can use their stats to compare and contrast. Florida has an awful o line and something awful at QB, Gillislee was the only productive element of the offense for almost the entire season - commanded the defenses attention because they knew if they shut him down they shut Florida down. Can't do the same with Lacy and Alabama.I'm more comfortable with Gillislee because of the skills he shows in the passing game. Very adept at pass blocking. Not just willingness to take on blockers, but technique and reading the guy he is assigned too. When he is in the passing game he shows the ability to find the soft spot against zone and does a very good job about acting like a blocker then reverse course mid play and make himself available as a passing threat, soft hands and has a good sense about what he's going to do after the catch without thinking - this is often a big issue with backs in the passing game. Having seen him do all of the above across several different games makes me more comfortable about this translating to the NFL. Like the questions in the run game I posed earlier re Lacy, not saying he can't do the above, just saying I haven't seen it. Comfort factor's just not there without the game tape. Veering outside the comfort zone outside the top 50-60 picks (and 1st round in dyno) is to be expected, but in the first two rounds of the NFL draft and in the first round of my rookie draft I want to feel comfortable the guy I'm picking will be an asset. With Lacy...I need to see where he goes. i.e. I was very sour on David Wilson this time last year, but when a team I respect that had a logical hole opening soon at RB picked him up my mind changed from 'not in round #1' to #5 on my board behind Rich, Martin, RG3, and Luck. I could see something similar happen with Lacy.
 
I want to say mid 3rd quarter, may have been earlier.I'd probably have less questions if he played behind a worse o line. He didn't HAVE to do things to consistently gain yards that he will have to do in the NFL. Unfair? Yeah, a bit, but the game tape doesn't lie. He knew he had the holes, just follow the blue print and look for creases to get extra yards then envoke the spin move when able to. He's not going to have those holes in the NFL and will either have to veer from the blue print or be more physical between the tackles. He hasn't shown he can do either - not saying he can't, saying he hasn't. A variable that must be considered.I feel more comfortable with Gillislee because I think they have similar games, but I have seen enough from Gillislee in the pass game to feel comfortable about him having a meaningful role in the NFL. He could just be an alright runner too, but if he plays a heavy role on the passing game that's fantasy starter material in the right situation.
Die hard Florida fan who watched Gilly play in person: "That is crazy". Gillislee isn't close to the prospect Lacy is and they are not too similar as players.
UF alum here who watched every game this season... definitely crazy. I wanted so badly to be excited about Gillislee's NFL prospects, but watching him, I just don't see it. Lacy, on the other hand, looks the part to me.
 
I haven't the slightest clue where Lacy ends up on my board because situation is going to be more important in this draft crop than any other one I can think of, but I'm going to have a hard time putting him in my top 5. He's...alright, but from a pure talent perspective he's not going to be in my top 30 at RB and his ceiling is pretty low too limiting future upside.
Alright? He has the footwork of players much smaller than him; speed too. From a talent perspective, he's a 1st round NFL draft pick in a league where RBs are going in the first less and less. He's a stud. Not in your top 30? Crazy talk.And for those that want to credit his offensive line - what about him making players miss? How many times did he create his own yardage last night? A lot.
Disagree about his speed, his feet and vision are his assets and the next time I see him create a play from nothing will be the first time. Although I like the leverage he runs with...but can he be a Marshawn/Gore type? or will his game suffer as he endures the pounding of the season? can he break NFL tackles between the hases consistently like those guys?Now that I'm writing it out his upside is a little higher (Marshawn/Gore) than I first thought, but there are a lot of 'if's' to overcome first to realize that upside. We had seen the breaking tackle and running through garbage ability from Marshawn and Gore...quite simply we haven't seen Lacy do it. Doesn't mean he can't, but it's a variable instead of an asset. Would be foolish to ignore.
His upside is higher than Gore and Lynch, but he's just "alright"?
Either I write terribly or you are an awful reader.I said he was alright.I amended and said maybe his upside is a little higher than I thought at first.He could be Gore or Marshawn...not better than.But, again, absolute ceiling.Ceiling doesn't = expectations, it's a ceiling. Lots of players have a Gore/Marshawn ceiling and end up like Mendenhall, Beanie, Donald Brown, Blount, Shonn Greene, MB3, Addai, etc. Others are worse. And where is Lacy in the pass game? If he goes to a situation in which he has to pass pro and run routes can he do it now? if not, can he adapt?A lot more questions than answers imho.
Who do you think is pretty decent?
 
Here are my RB rankings at this point, based on what I've seen on video, plus objective information like height, weight, and injury history. This is for fantasy, so upside is weighted heavily - it's similar to ranking players based on how likely they are to make the Pro Bowl. I've tried to ignore other people's opinions and base these rankings on my own independent analysis, even though I do give other people's evaluations a lot of weight in my actual dynasty drafts.

Tier 1:

Eddie Lacy

Giovani Bernard

Johnathan Franklin

Marcus Lattimore

Tier 2:

Christine Michael

Kenjon Barner

Montee Ball

Mike Gillislee

Knile Davis

Tier 3:

Ray Graham

Andre Ellington

Zac Stacy

Le'Veon Bell

DJ Harper

Tier 4:

Joseph Randle

Stepfan Taylor

Kerwynn Williams

Rex Burkhead

And these are my main impressions which are the basis for the rankings. Most of them were based on 3 games worth of play, and some of them will change over the coming months (based on watching more video, considering other people's evaluations, getting combine numbers, etc.).

Tier 1: Lacy, Bernard, and Franklin stood out for being hard to tackle, Lacy primarily with power and Gio & Franklin with a mix of skills that make them elusive. All three seem like relatively balanced, complete backs - especially Gio, who was heavily involved as a receiver (with Lacy I might have to add the qualifier "for his size"). Their speed/burst is pretty good but not elite. That's more of a concern for the smaller backs (I'll be paying a lot of attention to their combine numbers); Lacy had the explosiveness he needed to break tackles and might even deserve his own tier at the top. Lattimore had more speed and no questions about his size. His injury brings him down to the bottom of the tier but no further (he still might be the second most likely to make the Pro Bowl, after Lacy).

Tier 2: Michael, Ball, and Gillislee all look the part of a decent NFL back (including pretty good size & speed), and seem like relatively complete players, but don't stand out as having any elite skills. Michael & Gillislee have more speed, Ball has more power but still shows some burst through the hole. Barner & Davis are high-risk, high-upside guys. Barner is a relatively one-dimensional undersized speed back, but he's really fast (and very fast RBs have a good success rate). Knile Davis 2010 had speed and looked like a dangerous downhill runner as soon as he had a crease; the 2012 version danced around too much so that even when he made the first guy miss the pursuit would get to him. He'll need to return to his 2010 form, and make additional improvements (like ball security).

Tier 3: Graham, Ellington, Stacy, and Harper are all undersized guys who have shown some skill, Graham (2011 version) and Stacy with more shiftiness and Ellington & Harper with more speed. Graham (2011) broke a lot of tackles, but he's listed at 192 lbs. and doesn't have great speed, which raises concerns about how well his game will translate to the NFL (Graham 2012 looked pretty bad, but gets a mulligan for his ACL recovery year). I really liked Stacy's quick feet and elusiveness

, but he wasn't able to elude defenders as well in the other games I saw. Ellington & Harper don't seem quite fast enough to succeed as pure speed backs, and don't stand out as especially shifty/elusive, although Ellington did have some success as an interior runner and Harper showed some ability as a down-the-field receiver. Le'Veon Bell is similar to the relatively complete tier 2 backs, but slower and much bigger; unfortunately his weight only seems to have a small benefit in terms of making him harder to bring down (he's nowhere close to Lacy).Tier 4: Randle is skinny and not that fast; he rarely breaks tackles (although he is good at burrowing/diving forward for a few extra yards). Taylor lacks burst, and is only average in terms of power/elusiveness. If I was incorporating reputation in these rankings I might have him at the top of tier 3 as a passing down specialist who could get a bigger role in the right situation. Burkhead seems similar (although I only saw one game of his). Kerwynn Williams is like a smaller, easier to tackle version of Ellington & Harper.

 
I haven't the slightest clue where Lacy ends up on my board because situation is going to be more important in this draft crop than any other one I can think of, but I'm going to have a hard time putting him in my top 5. He's...alright, but from a pure talent perspective he's not going to be in my top 30 at RB and his ceiling is pretty low too limiting future upside.
Alright? He has the footwork of players much smaller than him; speed too. From a talent perspective, he's a 1st round NFL draft pick in a league where RBs are going in the first less and less. He's a stud. Not in your top 30? Crazy talk.And for those that want to credit his offensive line - what about him making players miss? How many times did he create his own yardage last night? A lot.
Disagree about his speed, his feet and vision are his assets and the next time I see him create a play from nothing will be the first time. Although I like the leverage he runs with...but can he be a Marshawn/Gore type? or will his game suffer as he endures the pounding of the season? can he break NFL tackles between the hases consistently like those guys?Now that I'm writing it out his upside is a little higher (Marshawn/Gore) than I first thought, but there are a lot of 'if's' to overcome first to realize that upside. We had seen the breaking tackle and running through garbage ability from Marshawn and Gore...quite simply we haven't seen Lacy do it. Doesn't mean he can't, but it's a variable instead of an asset. Would be foolish to ignore.
His upside is higher than Gore and Lynch, but he's just "alright"?
Either I write terribly or you are an awful reader.I said he was alright.I amended and said maybe his upside is a little higher than I thought at first.He could be Gore or Marshawn...not better than.But, again, absolute ceiling.Ceiling doesn't = expectations, it's a ceiling. Lots of players have a Gore/Marshawn ceiling and end up like Mendenhall, Beanie, Donald Brown, Blount, Shonn Greene, MB3, Addai, etc. Others are worse. And where is Lacy in the pass game? If he goes to a situation in which he has to pass pro and run routes can he do it now? if not, can he adapt?A lot more questions than answers imho.
Who do you think is pretty decent?
In this draft class? I think there are about a dozen decent, but flawed prospects - none that are clearly good, or better. With those types, situation is going to be more important than most previous classes in which there were players that separated themselves from the rest. When I say situation I don't just mean good teams either, I mean teams that will use these guys for specific roles that mask their flaws and allow them to utilize their strengths. If they're able to correct their flaws then role expansion can come sometime later.
 
Here are my RB rankings at this point, based on what I've seen on video, plus objective information like height, weight, and injury history. This is for fantasy, so upside is weighted heavily - it's similar to ranking players based on how likely they are to make the Pro Bowl. I've tried to ignore other people's opinions and base these rankings on my own independent analysis, even though I do give other people's evaluations a lot of weight in my actual dynasty drafts.Tier 1:Eddie LacyGiovani BernardJohnathan FranklinMarcus LattimoreTier 2:Christine MichaelKenjon BarnerMontee BallMike GillisleeKnile DavisTier 3:Ray GrahamAndre EllingtonZac StacyLe'Veon BellDJ HarperTier 4:Joseph RandleStepfan TaylorKerwynn WilliamsRex BurkheadAnd these are my main impressions which are the basis for the rankings. Most of them were based on 3 games worth of play, and some of them will change over the coming months (based on watching more video, considering other people's evaluations, getting combine numbers, etc.).Tier 1: Lacy, Bernard, and Franklin stood out for being hard to tackle, Lacy primarily with power and Gio & Franklin with a mix of skills that make them elusive. All three seem like relatively balanced, complete backs - especially Gio, who was heavily involved as a receiver (with Lacy I might have to add the qualifier "for his size"). Their speed/burst is pretty good but not elite. That's more of a concern for the smaller backs (I'll be paying a lot of attention to their combine numbers); Lacy had the explosiveness he needed to break tackles and might even deserve his own tier at the top. Lattimore had more speed and no questions about his size. His injury brings him down to the bottom of the tier but no further (he still might be the second most likely to make the Pro Bowl, after Lacy).Tier 2: Michael, Ball, and Gillislee all look the part of a decent NFL back (including pretty good size & speed), and seem like relatively complete players, but don't stand out as having any elite skills. Michael & Gillislee have more speed, Ball has more power but still shows some burst through the hole. Barner & Davis are high-risk, high-upside guys. Barner is a relatively one-dimensional undersized speed back, but he's really fast (and very fast RBs have a good success rate). Knile Davis 2010 had speed and looked like a dangerous downhill runner as soon as he had a crease; the 2012 version danced around too much so that even when he made the first guy miss the pursuit would get to him. He'll need to return to his 2010 form, and make additional improvements (like ball security).Tier 3: Graham, Ellington, Stacy, and Harper are all undersized guys who have shown some skill, Graham (2011 version) and Stacy with more shiftiness and Ellington & Harper with more speed. Graham (2011) broke a lot of tackles, but he's listed at 192 lbs. and doesn't have great speed, which raises concerns about how well his game will translate to the NFL (Graham 2012 looked pretty bad, but gets a mulligan for his ACL recovery year). I really liked Stacy's quick feet and elusiveness

Zac Stacy isn't "undersized", he's just short. He's 5'9" 210 lbs.
 
Here are my RB rankings at this point, based on what I've seen on video, plus objective information like height, weight, and injury history. This is for fantasy, so upside is weighted heavily - it's similar to ranking players based on how likely they are to make the Pro Bowl. I've tried to ignore other people's opinions and base these rankings on my own independent analysis, even though I do give other people's evaluations a lot of weight in my actual dynasty drafts.Tier 1:Eddie LacyGiovani BernardJohnathan FranklinMarcus LattimoreTier 2:Christine MichaelKenjon BarnerMontee BallMike GillisleeKnile DavisTier 3:Ray GrahamAndre EllingtonZac StacyLe'Veon BellDJ HarperTier 4:Joseph RandleStepfan TaylorKerwynn WilliamsRex BurkheadAnd these are my main impressions which are the basis for the rankings. Most of them were based on 3 games worth of play, and some of them will change over the coming months (based on watching more video, considering other people's evaluations, getting combine numbers, etc.).Tier 1: Lacy, Bernard, and Franklin stood out for being hard to tackle, Lacy primarily with power and Gio & Franklin with a mix of skills that make them elusive. All three seem like relatively balanced, complete backs - especially Gio, who was heavily involved as a receiver (with Lacy I might have to add the qualifier "for his size"). Their speed/burst is pretty good but not elite. That's more of a concern for the smaller backs (I'll be paying a lot of attention to their combine numbers); Lacy had the explosiveness he needed to break tackles and might even deserve his own tier at the top. Lattimore had more speed and no questions about his size. His injury brings him down to the bottom of the tier but no further (he still might be the second most likely to make the Pro Bowl, after Lacy).Tier 2: Michael, Ball, and Gillislee all look the part of a decent NFL back (including pretty good size & speed), and seem like relatively complete players, but don't stand out as having any elite skills. Michael & Gillislee have more speed, Ball has more power but still shows some burst through the hole. Barner & Davis are high-risk, high-upside guys. Barner is a relatively one-dimensional undersized speed back, but he's really fast (and very fast RBs have a good success rate). Knile Davis 2010 had speed and looked like a dangerous downhill runner as soon as he had a crease; the 2012 version danced around too much so that even when he made the first guy miss the pursuit would get to him. He'll need to return to his 2010 form, and make additional improvements (like ball security).Tier 3: Graham, Ellington, Stacy, and Harper are all undersized guys who have shown some skill, Graham (2011 version) and Stacy with more shiftiness and Ellington & Harper with more speed. Graham (2011) broke a lot of tackles, but he's listed at 192 lbs. and doesn't have great speed, which raises concerns about how well his game will translate to the NFL (Graham 2012 looked pretty bad, but gets a mulligan for his ACL recovery year). I really liked Stacy's quick feet and elusiveness

Awesome work! When are you releasing your wr and qb ranks?
 
Here are my RB rankings at this point, based on what I've seen on video, plus objective information like height, weight, and injury history. This is for fantasy, so upside is weighted heavily - it's similar to ranking players based on how likely they are to make the Pro Bowl. I've tried to ignore other people's opinions and base these rankings on my own independent analysis, even though I do give other people's evaluations a lot of weight in my actual dynasty drafts.
Thanks for this. Le'Veon Bell is a guy I rank higher than most. In this weak class, Gio and Lacy are the only 2 guys I would say are a clear tier ahead of him.I think the line bewteen "fast enough" and not is thin. He'll either be fast enough and his size, power, athletic ability will translate, or he won't be and it won't matter. 40 time will be important.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here are my RB rankings at this point, based on what I've seen on video, plus objective information like height, weight, and injury history. This is for fantasy, so upside is weighted heavily - it's similar to ranking players based on how likely they are to make the Pro Bowl. I've tried to ignore other people's opinions and base these rankings on my own independent analysis, even though I do give other people's evaluations a lot of weight in my actual dynasty drafts.
Well done and I respect that you don't follow group think. Jawan Jamison is missing here - did you do the list before he declared, do you just not like him or was it an oversight? Thanks again
 
I’ve been a bit leery of Lacy. The Alabama o-line is so good that I am not sure if Lacy’s numbers are more reflective of his skills or the line’s (maybe somewhere in between?). Admittedly, I don’t watch a ton of college football, so I haven’t seen that much of Lacey this year, but I did come away impressed with how he played against Notre Dame. He looked the part to me, in that game at least. Like most of us, I’ll be interested to see how his measurables stack up at the combine. –And I’ve definitely enjoyed the discussion here on Lacy (and others). Thanks.

 
Liking some of the names for the Shrine Bowl (if they all show up):http://www.shrinegame.com/Teams/westRosterNew.aspxhttp://www.shrinegame.com/Teams/EastRosterNew.aspxLook forward to practice reports (and NFLN coverage) more than the game.Also, announced Senior Bowl acceptances as of 1/4:http://www.seniorbowl.com/files/SB%20ANNOUNCED%20ACCEPTANCES%201413.pdf

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here are my RB rankings at this point, based on what I've seen on video, plus objective information like height, weight, and injury history. This is for fantasy, so upside is weighted heavily - it's similar to ranking players based on how likely they are to make the Pro Bowl. I've tried to ignore other people's opinions and base these rankings on my own independent analysis, even though I do give other people's evaluations a lot of weight in my actual dynasty drafts.Tier 1:Eddie LacyGiovani BernardJohnathan FranklinMarcus LattimoreTier 2:Christine MichaelKenjon BarnerMontee BallMike GillisleeKnile DavisTier 3:Ray GrahamAndre EllingtonZac StacyLe'Veon BellDJ HarperTier 4:Joseph RandleStepfan TaylorKerwynn WilliamsRex BurkheadAnd these are my main impressions which are the basis for the rankings. Most of them were based on 3 games worth of play, and some of them will change over the coming months (based on watching more video, considering other people's evaluations, getting combine numbers, etc.).Tier 1: Lacy, Bernard, and Franklin stood out for being hard to tackle, Lacy primarily with power and Gio & Franklin with a mix of skills that make them elusive. All three seem like relatively balanced, complete backs - especially Gio, who was heavily involved as a receiver (with Lacy I might have to add the qualifier "for his size"). Their speed/burst is pretty good but not elite. That's more of a concern for the smaller backs (I'll be paying a lot of attention to their combine numbers); Lacy had the explosiveness he needed to break tackles and might even deserve his own tier at the top. Lattimore had more speed and no questions about his size. His injury brings him down to the bottom of the tier but no further (he still might be the second most likely to make the Pro Bowl, after Lacy).Tier 2: Michael, Ball, and Gillislee all look the part of a decent NFL back (including pretty good size & speed), and seem like relatively complete players, but don't stand out as having any elite skills. Michael & Gillislee have more speed, Ball has more power but still shows some burst through the hole. Barner & Davis are high-risk, high-upside guys. Barner is a relatively one-dimensional undersized speed back, but he's really fast (and very fast RBs have a good success rate). Knile Davis 2010 had speed and looked like a dangerous downhill runner as soon as he had a crease; the 2012 version danced around too much so that even when he made the first guy miss the pursuit would get to him. He'll need to return to his 2010 form, and make additional improvements (like ball security).Tier 3: Graham, Ellington, Stacy, and Harper are all undersized guys who have shown some skill, Graham (2011 version) and Stacy with more shiftiness and Ellington & Harper with more speed. Graham (2011) broke a lot of tackles, but he's listed at 192 lbs. and doesn't have great speed, which raises concerns about how well his game will translate to the NFL (Graham 2012 looked pretty bad, but gets a mulligan for his ACL recovery year). I really liked Stacy's quick feet and elusiveness

Thanks for posting but Stepfan Taylor, Ellington, L. Bell belong in tier 2.
 
Walter Football has Lacy going to the Packers in the 2nd round. Second or 3rd RB off the board. Pittsburgh took someone ahead of them in the mock, but not sure it was anyone else before the Packers.

 
'tdmills said:
Here are my RB rankings at this point, based on what I've seen on video, plus objective information like height, weight, and injury history. This is for fantasy, so upside is weighted heavily - it's similar to ranking players based on how likely they are to make the Pro Bowl. I've tried to ignore other people's opinions and base these rankings on my own independent analysis, even though I do give other people's evaluations a lot of weight in my actual dynasty drafts.Tier 1:Eddie LacyGiovani BernardJohnathan FranklinMarcus LattimoreTier 2:Christine MichaelKenjon BarnerMontee BallMike GillisleeKnile DavisTier 3:Ray GrahamAndre EllingtonZac StacyLe'Veon BellDJ HarperTier 4:Joseph RandleStepfan TaylorKerwynn WilliamsRex BurkheadAnd these are my main impressions which are the basis for the rankings. Most of them were based on 3 games worth of play, and some of them will change over the coming months (based on watching more video, considering other people's evaluations, getting combine numbers, etc.).Tier 1: Lacy, Bernard, and Franklin stood out for being hard to tackle, Lacy primarily with power and Gio & Franklin with a mix of skills that make them elusive. All three seem like relatively balanced, complete backs - especially Gio, who was heavily involved as a receiver (with Lacy I might have to add the qualifier "for his size"). Their speed/burst is pretty good but not elite. That's more of a concern for the smaller backs (I'll be paying a lot of attention to their combine numbers); Lacy had the explosiveness he needed to break tackles and might even deserve his own tier at the top. Lattimore had more speed and no questions about his size. His injury brings him down to the bottom of the tier but no further (he still might be the second most likely to make the Pro Bowl, after Lacy).Tier 2: Michael, Ball, and Gillislee all look the part of a decent NFL back (including pretty good size & speed), and seem like relatively complete players, but don't stand out as having any elite skills. Michael & Gillislee have more speed, Ball has more power but still shows some burst through the hole. Barner & Davis are high-risk, high-upside guys. Barner is a relatively one-dimensional undersized speed back, but he's really fast (and very fast RBs have a good success rate). Knile Davis 2010 had speed and looked like a dangerous downhill runner as soon as he had a crease; the 2012 version danced around too much so that even when he made the first guy miss the pursuit would get to him. He'll need to return to his 2010 form, and make additional improvements (like ball security).Tier 3: Graham, Ellington, Stacy, and Harper are all undersized guys who have shown some skill, Graham (2011 version) and Stacy with more shiftiness and Ellington & Harper with more speed. Graham (2011) broke a lot of tackles, but he's listed at 192 lbs. and doesn't have great speed, which raises concerns about how well his game will translate to the NFL (Graham 2012 looked pretty bad, but gets a mulligan for his ACL recovery year). I really liked Stacy's quick feet and elusiveness

:goodposting: The first reason mentioned in tier 1 is "hard to tackle." If that was the top criteria I don't understand how Taylor could be ranked so low. I do have concerns about his burst, but I love his hard nosed style. His ability to pass protect has also been well developed in the Stanford system. Ultimately, I suspect Taylor carves out a nice number of touches at the NFL level. I see his upside as a RB2.
 
Don't know if Bray will ultimately be a bust - depends on when he's drafted. If it's day 3, then he isn't a bust even if he fails (based on failure rate in that range). As far as dynasty drafts go (and not sure if this is what you were eluding too), I can see all 3 either going higher than expected or not living up to expectations but all 3 are guys I would take shots on early than where the consensus likely has them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just went through and updated my files on the RB class. Like ZWK above, this is my own work and doesn't incorporate expected draft position or anyone's opinion on a player. The initial phase is 100% quantitative. These will change as the combine and all-star game weigh ins pin down players' measurables. And again after the draft.

Clean Profile

--Eddie Lacy (hands down my top pick today)

Like, But Obvious Questions

--Marcus Lattimore (need more info on the injury)

--Knile Davis (need more info on the injuries)

--Cameron Marshall (2nd tier talent, scouts don't seem to care for him)

--Spencer Ware (2nd tier talent, seemingly off the radar right now)

Wait and See Combine Results

--Montee Ball

--Giovani Bernard

--Stepfan Taylor

--Ray Graham

Don't Like, but Could be Surprised

--Mike Gillislee

--Joseph Randle

Don't Like and Probably Won't Change

Andre Ellington

Christine Michael

Jawon Jamison

Jonathan Franklin

Kenjon Barner

Le'Veon Bell

Michael Dyer

Rex Burkhead

Stefphon Jefferson

Theo Riddick

Zac Stacy

 
Here are my RB rankings at this point, based on what I've seen on video, plus objective information like height, weight, and injury history. This is for fantasy, so upside is weighted heavily - it's similar to ranking players based on how likely they are to make the Pro Bowl. I've tried to ignore other people's opinions and base these rankings on my own independent analysis, even though I do give other people's evaluations a lot of weight in my actual dynasty drafts.Tier 1:Eddie LacyGiovani BernardJohnathan FranklinMarcus LattimoreTier 2:Christine MichaelKenjon BarnerMontee BallMike GillisleeKnile DavisTier 3:Ray GrahamAndre EllingtonZac StacyLe'Veon BellDJ HarperTier 4:Joseph RandleStepfan TaylorKerwynn WilliamsRex BurkheadAnd these are my main impressions which are the basis for the rankings. Most of them were based on 3 games worth of play, and some of them will change over the coming months (based on watching more video, considering other people's evaluations, getting combine numbers, etc.).Tier 1: Lacy, Bernard, and Franklin stood out for being hard to tackle, Lacy primarily with power and Gio & Franklin with a mix of skills that make them elusive. All three seem like relatively balanced, complete backs - especially Gio, who was heavily involved as a receiver (with Lacy I might have to add the qualifier "for his size"). Their speed/burst is pretty good but not elite. That's more of a concern for the smaller backs (I'll be paying a lot of attention to their combine numbers); Lacy had the explosiveness he needed to break tackles and might even deserve his own tier at the top. Lattimore had more speed and no questions about his size. His injury brings him down to the bottom of the tier but no further (he still might be the second most likely to make the Pro Bowl, after Lacy).Tier 2: Michael, Ball, and Gillislee all look the part of a decent NFL back (including pretty good size & speed), and seem like relatively complete players, but don't stand out as having any elite skills. Michael & Gillislee have more speed, Ball has more power but still shows some burst through the hole. Barner & Davis are high-risk, high-upside guys. Barner is a relatively one-dimensional undersized speed back, but he's really fast (and very fast RBs have a good success rate). Knile Davis 2010 had speed and looked like a dangerous downhill runner as soon as he had a crease; the 2012 version danced around too much so that even when he made the first guy miss the pursuit would get to him. He'll need to return to his 2010 form, and make additional improvements (like ball security).Tier 3: Graham, Ellington, Stacy, and Harper are all undersized guys who have shown some skill, Graham (2011 version) and Stacy with more shiftiness and Ellington & Harper with more speed. Graham (2011) broke a lot of tackles, but he's listed at 192 lbs. and doesn't have great speed, which raises concerns about how well his game will translate to the NFL (Graham 2012 looked pretty bad, but gets a mulligan for his ACL recovery year). I really liked Stacy's quick feet and elusiveness

with multiple missed/broken tackles, but other than that I counted very few of them. Lacy, Bernard, and Franklin consistently got past defenders, on play after play. Taylor did not.
 
Just went through and updated my files on the RB class. Like ZWK above, this is my own work and doesn't incorporate expected draft position or anyone's opinion on a player. The initial phase is 100% quantitative. These will change as the combine and all-star game weigh ins pin down players' measurables. And again after the draft.

Clean Profile

--Eddie Lacy (hands down my top pick today)

Like, But Obvious Questions

--Marcus Lattimore (need more info on the injury)

--Knile Davis (need more info on the injuries)

--Cameron Marshall (2nd tier talent, scouts don't seem to care for him)

--Spencer Ware (2nd tier talent, seemingly off the radar right now)

Wait and See Combine Results

--Montee Ball

--Giovani Bernard

--Stepfan Taylor

--Ray Graham

Don't Like, but Could be Surprised

--Mike Gillislee

--Joseph Randle

Don't Like and Probably Won't Change

Andre Ellington

Christine Michael

Jawon Jamison

Jonathan Franklin

Kenjon Barner

Le'Veon Bell

Michael Dyer

Rex Burkhead

Stefphon Jefferson

Theo Riddick

Zac Stacy
:goodposting: For the record, I put more weight on wdcrob's rankings than I do on my own.

 
Like most of your calls, but...

Don't Like and Probably Won't Change

Michael Dyer
:boxing:
Thought of you when I saw where he slotted in. The character stuff alone would scare me off, but his Auburn stats really don't look that good to me either. Time will tell!
How do Dyer's stats not impress you but Cameron Marshall's do? Cameron Marshall's YPC ranks among the worst in the Pac-12 the past 2 seasons. His own teammate averaged over 2 yards more per carry this season.
 
Yea, I would think that Dyer's production would be a strong point. 1093 yards as a true freshman on 6.0 YPC. 1242 yards as a sophomore on 5.1 YPC. Pretty good numbers against mostly SEC teams. His production dropped after his first season, but I attribute a lot of that to the supporting cast. Auburn got really bad really fast after Cam left, and that includes 2011 when Dyer was basically their entire offense. I like the Spencer Ware call though. I think he is very underrated and a much better talent than his stats would suggest. He is the type that I would pick if I were running a pro team because he offers a lot of valuable skills and versatility. He can run short yardage and block well, but can also catch passes and make plays in the open field. As for Cameron Marshall, I have followed him pretty closely since his freshman season because I took him a dev draft last year. I thought he showed first round potential early in his career, but he never quite progressed as I'd hoped. I'd chalk that up to a few different variables. The first is that he's not naturally elusive or a great cutter. He just doesn't have great feet or hips and seems to lack instincts. The second (and related) factor is that he has had a lot of durability problems. I don't know that he's been 100% healthy at any point since early in 2011. He had a bum ankle last year and it seemed like similar issues plagued him all the way up until this season.http://www.azcentral.com/sports/asu/articles/20120814asu-football-cameron-marshall-limited-rest-of-camp.htmlFinally, ASU used more of a committee approach to get some other backs involved. I don't think guys like Mario Grice and DJ Foster have pro futures, but they were effective enough at the college level to vulture carries. Kind of like what Ware suffered through with guys like Kenny Hilliard and Michael Ford. Anyways, Marshall is a great size/speed guy and he should put up some nice stats at the combine. He's a draftable talent who should make a roster. I view him as more of a sleeper/flyer than a guy who's likely to succeed though.

 
For the record, I put more weight on wdcrob's rankings than I do on my own.
Thanks ZWK ... appreciate that.As for Dyer, I could be missing the boat -- but I think if you consider his time with Cam and his time without Cam you get a pretty fair approximation of what he'd do in a neutral situation.And my expectations for players aren't the same either. A 190 pound scatback has a different set of performance requirements than a 240 pound FB/HB hybrid.
 
Like most of your calls, but...

Don't Like and Probably Won't Change

Michael Dyer
:boxing:
Thought of you when I saw where he slotted in. The character stuff alone would scare me off, but his Auburn stats really don't look that good to me either. Time will tell!
How do Dyer's stats not impress you but Cameron Marshall's do? Cameron Marshall's YPC ranks among the worst in the Pac-12 the past 2 seasons. His own teammate averaged over 2 yards more per carry this season.
Marshall looks overweight this year and has been pretty pedestrian as a runner.
 
That was not a pretty game between Stanford and Wisconsin. Poor QB play. Neither RB really did much. Taylor showed good power and balance with some nice second effort runs, but his longest gain of the night was 10 yards. I like his overall game, but he doesn't really have that "wow" kind of explosiveness. And Ball was very pedestrian. He gets what's there, but doesn't look like a playmaker to me. I might like James White more as a pro prospect in a vacuum, although I do think Ball could be serviceable if thrust into duty on a decent team.
:goodposting: ball isn't much of a prospect imo. there area 3 or 4 rb's id's rather have this draft. i do think mevlin gordon is someone to watch though in the future. love his potential.
Gordon > White
 
One thing to keep in mind regarding Lacy is that he wasn't fully healthy and in game shape until the second half of the season....maybe late. He had a rough summer with his toe...and was out of shape in Sept.

 
Manti Te'o still first-round pick despite rough BCS title game

By Daniel Jeremiah

Analyst, NFL.com and NFL Network

MIAMI GARDENS, Fla. -- Manti Te'o had a rough outing in the BCS Championship Game on Monday night. There is no way to sugarcoat it. After 12 solid performances, Te'o and the Notre Dame defense were annihilated by a bigger, stronger and faster Alabama offense, as the Crimson Tide sprinted to a 42-14 win. On the game's opening possession, Alabama's offensive line took control of the game, pushing Te'o and his defensive mates right down the field.

Te'o wasn't the only Irish defender to be manhandled, but his reputation coming into the game made his poor play the focus of everyone's attention. He was routinely late to fill gaps. When he was able to engage a 'Bama lineman, he couldn't free himself to make a play. When he was unblocked, he missed several tackles, either by bouncing off or whiffing on the talented Crimson Tide running backs.

The world of Twitter exploded with negative comments about Te'o. Shoot, I personally contributed a handful myself. However, let's not get too carried away with one bad -- OK, horrible -- performance.

A few weeks ago, I wrote about Te'o's pro potential, comparing him to former Alabama linebacker DeMeco Ryans. I never put Te'o in the same class as players like Patrick Willis, Jerod Mayo and Jon Beason when they entered the draft.

I don't envision Te'o's stock tumbling quite as dramatically as one might expect after Monday night's poor play. Teams that run a 3-4 defense might be a little concerned about Te'o's inability to use his hands to get off blocks, but that's something that can be taught and improved upon. What this game might prove is that he is best suited to play in a 4-3 scheme, in which opposing offensive guards would be covered up and unable to get a clean run at him.

I'm still certain Te'o will be a first-round draft pick. He will excel during his interviews with individual teams, and his leadership abilities and intelligence will elevate his stock. Everyone has a bad game or two during their career; NFL teams won't overreact to the Monday night massacre.

Here are a few observations on some other players from the BCS Championship Game:

Alabama RB Eddie Lacy: The powerful junior was the star of the game, putting together one highlight-reel run after another. Lacy showed off his foot quickness with a few nifty jump cuts to avoid tacklers at the line of scrimmage, then he sought out contact, running over other Irish defenders. He also caught the ball well and eluded opposing tacklers with a couple of nasty spin moves. His play reminded me of former Baltimore Ravens running back Jamal Lewis. Like Lewis, Lacy has quick feet and runs angry.

Alabama QB AJ McCarron: McCarron had a phenomenal game, showing tremendous poise in the pocket and making excellent decisions throughout. He displayed the arm strength to drive the ball on dig routes over the middle and a soft touch on deep crossing routes. I stood next to him on the field during warmups, and I can tell you he has a big, sturdy frame. There wasn't much to dislike about this young quarterback.

Alabama LG Chance Warmack: Alabama's Warmack-led offensive line was dominant, with the Tide's mauling guard creating huge holes all game long. I'd been impressed with his power when watching him on tape, but I hadn't been enamored with his ability to adjust at the second level. On Monday, he was much better in that department. He took the correct angles when working up to linebackers and showed the ability to lock on and finish in space. He's a difference-maker in the run game.

Notre Dame NT Louis Nix: The hulking lineman was the lone bright spot on the Irish defense. Nix was able to hold the point of attack against the talented 'Bama linemen and also displayed the lateral quickness to make plays outside of the tackle box. He finished the game with five stops and two tackles for loss.

Notre Dame TE Tyler Eifert: Eifert didn't have a big game, but he is very talented -- a smooth athlete who runs clean routes and has a huge catching radius. I couldn't understand why the Irish kept sending him to the short side of the field to line up against 'Bama's top cover man, Dee Milliner, given the huge talent gap between Milliner and the other starting cornerback, Deion Belue. That was a mistake in the Notre Dame game plan.

Alabama RB T.J. Yeldon, WR Amari Cooper: Alabama's freshman duo is the best in the nation. Yeldon and Cooper had both jumped off the tape when I studied the 'Bama offense, and on Monday, they both produced numerous explosive plays. Yeldon's running style is equal parts smooth and dynamic. Cooper will draw comparisons to former Alabama star Julio Jones, though his gliding style actually reminds me more of A.J. Green. These two studs should have this program right back in the mix for another title next season.

Alabama LB C.J. Mosley: The junior inside linebacker was the most talented defender in the game. Mosley has good size and explosive, sideline-to-sideline range. He is very quick to read and react and is a physical tackler in the hole. Mosley has the athleticism to run and cover backs and tight ends, and he also has excellent awareness when he drops into zone coverage. To sum it up, he can do it all.
 
I've posted this before, but updated it due to the end of the season. I'm not saying Lacy is better than Ingram/Richardson...but I don't think he's not in the discussion.Interesting comparison of Alabama RBsMark Ingram's YPC: 5.1, 6.1, 5.5T Richardson's YPC: 5.2, 6.3, 5.9Eddie Lacy's YPC: 7.3, 7.1, 6.5Lacy has 3 seasons all better than the best single season of Ingram/Richardson combined.

 
I've posted this before, but updated it due to the end of the season. I'm not saying Lacy is better than Ingram/Richardson...but I don't think he's not in the discussion.

Interesting comparison of Alabama RBs

Mark Ingram's YPC: 5.1, 6.1, 5.5

T Richardson's YPC: 5.2, 6.3, 5.9

Eddie Lacy's YPC: 7.3, 7.1, 6.5

Lacy has 3 seasons all better than the best single season of Ingram/Richardson combined.
Um, no. You kind of have to take the amount of carries into consideration, you can't just focus on YPC and ignore all other statistics; because then you're left making the erroneous conclusion that Eddie Lacy's 56 carry, 406 rushing yard freshman season was better than Richardson's 283 carry, 1679 rushing yard junior season, for example.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top