Okay, so your thoughts are valid because some poster started a thread about Matt Flynn.
Let's
see some actual experts break it down that actually have a say in the vote. You'll see that not a single one of them mentions Matt Flynn's performance or anything about a "system" at all (much less as a negative factor) when they pick Rodgers. I doubt that argument even enters into the decision process for most of the voters.
HmmmYou act as if it's only a handfull of FBG's posters are talking about this...
This is a national sports discussion, validating the discussion we are having here..
You degrading every poster who seems to take up the opposing argument is rather immature, and getting kinda old..
Reality is, there is merit to the discussion, whether it's enough to knock Rodgers out of MVP isn't the only discussion point.
1) Is it a valid discussion? Yes..
2) Should Flynn's production weigh into the Rodgers MVP discussion? Yes
3) Does Flynn's production weigh in enough to knock Rodgers out of the MVP spot? Probably not..
You've been consistently wrong about questions 1 and 2.. Shows extreme bias on your behalf, which is ok.. You're a Packers fan.. But to make ignorant, degrading or thick headed remarks about it isn't making you sound very intelligent..
I think Rodger's wins the MVP. I don't think that proves he is, was, has been, will be the better QB. That is still up for discussion. He's a media darling. He has played some very solid/great football, MVP caliber.. But he isn't the only one.
