Cameron Wake to DE?
#1
Posted 26 January 2012 - 05:58 AM
#2
Posted 26 January 2012 - 07:09 AM
Dansby in the middle? Burnett on the weakside?
As for Wake, it definitely boosts his value, but I wonder how it effects his production if he has to put his hand in the dirt.
#3
Posted 27 January 2012 - 05:45 AM
#4
Posted 27 January 2012 - 06:06 AM
I'd guess it's Sam Dansby, Mike Misi, and Will Burnett... unless they sign or draft someone to make it Backup Misi.
I think it may be Cut Misi. He looks like a 3-4 OLB to me. Maybe a backup rush DE but not a Mike IMO
I think Wake is undersized for DE too but could be somewhat like Clemons in SEA
#5
Posted 27 January 2012 - 07:56 AM
#6
Posted 27 January 2012 - 09:54 AM
I'd guess it's Sam Dansby, Mike Misi, and Will Burnett... unless they sign or draft someone to make it Backup Misi.
I don't think, under any circumstances, Misi plays Mike.
#7
Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:14 PM
June ? July ?
#8
Posted 03 May 2012 - 01:51 AM
Do you know when MFL is gonna make the first role changes ?
June ? July ?
They usually don't do anything based on hearsay or what-if's, they usually wait until the team updates the player positions then they update the database. This usually happens just before the season starts, mid to late August would be my best guess.
#9
Posted 03 May 2012 - 03:58 AM
#10
Posted 03 May 2012 - 04:06 AM
#11
Posted 06 May 2012 - 08:05 AM
#12
Posted 15 May 2012 - 02:51 PM
2012 NFFC Online Champion ($100,000 winner) (1872 teams)
Charleston Chimeras 1998 1999 2003 2005 2006 2009 2010 Champions (Dynasty 1997-2012)
Charlotte Cobras 2010 2012 Champions (Dynasty 2010-2012)
Colorado Vipers 1991 1996 2003 Champions(ReDraft 1990-2012)
Minnesota Muskrats 1995 1998 2000 2001 2006 2007 2009 Champions (ReDraft 1994-2012)
Blue Dragons ($750 FFPC Dynasty 2012)
Wyverns ($500 FFPC Dynasty 2012)
Gryphons ($750 FFPC Dynasty 2011-2012)
Dragons ($750 FFPC Dynasty 2010-2012)
#13
Posted 13 June 2012 - 05:36 PM
Everyone is so excited about his move to DE, but actually, in my league's scoring system, even at DL he ranked as the #38 DL last year, so no better than a DL3/4 in a standard 12 team league (and well below alot of guys typically ranked lower than him). Yet, he is listed in the top 10 in most DL ranks.
So what are we expecting in terms of actual stats this year? Is the move going to give him increased tackle and rush/sack opportunities? I've read other places that some people expect Wake to basically repeat last year's stats.....if that's the case, he's not worth his very high ranking, at least in my league.
So are we expecting similar stats to last year, or should I be expecting a big boost in stats across the board?
#14
Posted 14 June 2012 - 02:18 AM
So what do we expect really from Wake at DE this year?
Everyone is so excited about his move to DE, but actually, in my league's scoring system, even at DL he ranked as the #38 DL last year, so no better than a DL3/4 in a standard 12 team league (and well below alot of guys typically ranked lower than him). Yet, he is listed in the top 10 in most DL ranks.
So what are we expecting in terms of actual stats this year? Is the move going to give him increased tackle and rush/sack opportunities? I've read other places that some people expect Wake to basically repeat last year's stats.....if that's the case, he's not worth his very high ranking, at least in my league.
So are we expecting similar stats to last year, or should I be expecting a big boost in stats across the board?
Wake would have 26th in FBG DL scoring. His consensus ranking here is a mid DL2. I expect his stats to be somewhere between his last 2 years for now. Because of the position change, Wake is not easy to rank right now, which is why I have him 20th or so. I need to see how he plays DE in preseason before I can comment further or adjust his ranking.
Click here to listen to the Audible, and get another edge on your competition.
Want to be the best in IDP leagues? Start by checking out The Audible IDP podcasts: IDP 101, IDP 201, IDP 301, IDP 401a, IDP 401b
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










