Bush to the Bears
#1
Posted 22 March 2012 - 07:52 AM
Reply
Retweet
Favorite
· Open
Michael Bush agrees to terms with the Bears, per league source. Four years, $14 million.
Retweeted by Tyler Dunne
#2
Posted 22 March 2012 - 07:57 AM
#3
Posted 22 March 2012 - 07:57 AM
That has to hurt for Forte owners.That has to hurt for Bush owners.
#4
Posted 22 March 2012 - 07:58 AM
#5
Posted 22 March 2012 - 07:59 AM
#6
Posted 22 March 2012 - 07:59 AM
#7
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:00 AM
That has to hurt for Forte owners.
That has to hurt for Bush owners.
^This
#8
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:00 AM
#9
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:02 AM
#10
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:02 AM
#11
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:06 AM
Just a reminder that the days of a team wanting a single bell cow are G-O-N-E...
Makes sense from an NFL standpoint. It's been a long time coming, imo.
Maybe we will start seeing more FF leagues with team RBs instead of individuals.
#12
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:06 AM
Hard to believe that a pretty good RB can't get paid much more than some of the kickers are getting paid now.
#13
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:08 AM
It's the nature of the position in the NFL these days.Hard to believe that a pretty good RB can't get paid much more than some of the kickers are getting paid now.
#14
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:09 AM
That has to hurt for Forte owners.
That has to hurt for Bush owners.
Absolutely. Part of Forte's value has been that he has been responsible for a HUGE percentage of Chicago's offense. I have no doubts that the Bears will be cutting back his workload by a good bit to keep him fresher.
It also doesn't bode well for him longterm as a Bear. Hard to demand a ton of cash when the Bears could just shrug their shoulders and make Bush the starter.
#15
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:09 AM
The only positive I see in this as a NYG type of situation where Forte is Bradshaw and Jacobs in Bush. Bradshaw was/is still pretty darn good.
This is the best Bush can do it really shows what type of value he has in the NFL as a RB.
-The schedule is a template that they developed years ago. No one can complain about who they get or don't get to play, as there is no decision-making in the process and all teams rotate the same scheduling format. It's all prepackaged- David Yudkin
#16
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:12 AM
OO===|==|===V===|==|===OO|
#17
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:15 AM
4 years $14M.
Hard to believe that a pretty good RB can't get paid much more than some of the kickers are getting paid now.
LOL BUNGLES
anyway, i dont think this is all that bad for bush owners. i think he gets more touches than with the raiders and certainly more goal line plunges.
#18
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:15 AM
4 years $14M.
Hard to believe that a pretty good RB can't get paid much more than some of the kickers are getting paid now.
He's 28 and nothing special.
#19
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:16 AM
He has a role for sure, but one that is complimentary to a better RB.
-The schedule is a template that they developed years ago. No one can complain about who they get or don't get to play, as there is no decision-making in the process and all teams rotate the same scheduling format. It's all prepackaged- David Yudkin
#20
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:19 AM
Agreed....Terrible for both Bush and Forte in fantasy.
The only positive I see in this as a NYG type of situation where Forte is Bradshaw and Jacobs in Bush. Bradshaw was/is still pretty darn good.
This is the best Bush can do it really shows what type of value he has in the NFL as a RB.
#21
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:20 AM
4 years $14M.
Hard to believe that a pretty good RB can't get paid much more than some of the kickers are getting paid now.
He's 28 and nothing special.
So very true, yet some can't see it.
#22
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:22 AM
Actually, this might not be true. I agree with the guys saying Bush isn't all that great.And the diminishment of the "stud" RB in both real and fantasy terms continues.
And what this does for Forte, in fantasy terms, is make him fresher for a playoff run. Plus it extends his career.
OO===|==|===V===|==|===OO|
#23
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:27 AM
Forte last year was already losing TD's to Barber and was still a very good fantasy RB.
-The schedule is a template that they developed years ago. No one can complain about who they get or don't get to play, as there is no decision-making in the process and all teams rotate the same scheduling format. It's all prepackaged- David Yudkin
#24
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:30 AM
QB: Aaron Rodgers, Andy Dalton
RB:Beanie Wells, Michael Bush, Kendall Hunter, James Starks
WR: AJ Green, Torrey Smith, Laurent Robinson, Denarius Moore, Titus Young, Vincent Brown
TE: Rob Gronkowski, Aaron Hernandez, Kyle Rudolph, Kellen Winslow
K: Rackers
DEF: 49ers, Eagles
Rookie picks: 1, 6, 9, 11, 14, 20, 24 30
#25
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:33 AM
4 years $14M.
Hard to believe that a pretty good RB can't get paid much more than some of the kickers are getting paid now.
He's 28 and nothing special.
:shrug; I thought he actually looked pretty good running the ball when he got a chance last year. He almost always gets positive yardage and breaks a big one every once in a while. He's no Adrian Peterson or elite RB, but I think he's better than a lot of starters in the NFL.
#26
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:33 AM
#27
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:40 AM
Great move for the Bears. Horrible destination for Michael Bush fantasy wise.
Well put.
#28
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:42 AM
As others posted above, he's just not that good.
Love marcel Reese now as a value play, in case DMC does not fare well from injury.
#29
Posted 22 March 2012 - 08:50 AM
#30
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:00 AM
This girl is too pretty, she's crushing me every time I talk to her. It's too much. ![]()
(I hear Dr. Wily is coming back with some sick Robot Masters...
Get Ready, Megaman!)
#31
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:07 AM
4 years $14M.
Hard to believe that a pretty good RB can't get paid much more than some of the kickers are getting paid now.
He's 28 and nothing special.
:shrug; I thought he actually looked pretty good running the ball when he got a chance last year. He almost always gets positive yardage and breaks a big one every once in a while. He's no Adrian Peterson or elite RB, but I think he's better than a lot of starters in the NFL.
I'm not saying he sucks - but he's really not all that much better than the much maligned Shonn Greene. They're both mostly straightline power backs. Greene's a little faster in a straightline. Bush is a little shiftier and tougher (and a better receiver).
The fact that he'll be 28 before the season starts and his limitations (slow) had more to do with the soft market for his services than the "devaluation of RBs" imo.
#32
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:19 AM
With that contract and his performance he is allowed to complain. Wouldn't you also ask your boss for a raise after completely outperforming the expectations?Great signing for the Bears. Maybe Forte will shut the hell up now and stop complaining about his contract.
Btw, I can't really recall Forte "complaining" too much and can't see him holding out.
#33
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:25 AM
#34
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:27 AM
####
What he (probably) said.
#35
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:35 AM
2011 Survivor PDSL BSS
2011 Anarchy League 3
2011 Anarchy League 4
2011 IBL Interboard Challenge Individual Champ
Potential means you haven't done anything yet.
Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard.
#36
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:39 AM
No. that would be Taiwan Jones, aka, the chris Johnson waiting to happen.He averaged 3.8 ypc and slowed down tremendously late in the year....
As others posted above, he's just not that good.
Love marcel Reese now as a value play, in case DMC does not fare well from injury.
I am surprised that so many people are just assuming this is going to be a situation where Forte and Bush coincide in the same backfield.
Let me spin this yarn for you and see what you think: Let's say this lets the Bears get nasty with Forte and forte ends up somewhere else; let's say in new york with the Giants or Jets. Then maybye the Bears bring in a replacement that is , say, Ryan grant or Joey Addai or , heaven forbid, some way this ends up bringing DWIL or JSTEW there.
I guess I'm just saying this looks like a signing that sets other things in motion and it may be premature to assume what this means to the Bears or these players.
#37
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:42 AM
#38
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:48 AM
#39
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:49 AM
No. that would be Taiwan Jones, aka, the chris Johnson waiting to happen.
He averaged 3.8 ypc and slowed down tremendously late in the year....
As others posted above, he's just not that good.
Love marcel Reese now as a value play, in case DMC does not fare well from injury.
I am surprised that so many people are just assuming this is going to be a situation where Forte and Bush coincide in the same backfield.
Let me spin this yarn for you and see what you think: Let's say this lets the Bears get nasty with Forte and forte ends up somewhere else; let's say in new york with the Giants or Jets. Then maybye the Bears bring in a replacement that is , say, Ryan grant or Joey Addai or , heaven forbid, some way this ends up bringing DWIL or JSTEW there.
I guess I'm just saying this looks like a signing that sets other things in motion and it may be premature to assume what this means to the Bears or these players.
Doubtful. He's way too involved in the offense. He's not like other rbs that amount for 30% of the snaps. Forte is 75% of the snaps.
#40
Posted 22 March 2012 - 09:55 AM
how good is bush at picking up the blitz?
good luck Cutler! duck & cover
#41
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:01 AM
how good is bush at picking up the blitz?![]()
good luck Cutler! duck & cover
You mean like he did last year, with Forte blocking for him?
#42
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:04 AM
There's only so many times a man that has done everything he's been asked to do can be disrespected! Guess the GOOD GUYS do finish last....
What you've just said ... is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul..
#43
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:04 AM
how good is bush at picking up the blitz?![]()
good luck Cutler! duck & cover
You mean like he did last year, with Forte blocking for him?
Don't know about Forte's blocking skills. If that's the case, good thing the Bears signed Glo to back up Cutler. He's a good scrambler.
#44
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:05 AM
Actually though, Bush probably wouldn't be on the field on what would be obvious "passing downs". As the short-yardage/goal line type guy, he would likely be either the guy they actually were handing the ball off to, or a decoy to set up a quick short pass.
how good is bush at picking up the blitz?![]()
good luck Cutler! duck & cover
As a Bears fan, I really like the addition. I think the Bears are a little more "depth-conscious" after last year's debacle after guys got dinged (bad QB play after Cutler went down, Barber's running out of bounds costing them the Denver game, etc.). The nice thing is that they are not just adding depth, but quality depth.
Edited by DoubleG, 22 March 2012 - 10:07 AM.
statistics don't lie, just people who use them
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, just not their own set of facts.
Physical disabilities does NOT include obesity. Take the stairs, fattie.
I can't think of a single problem in life that can't be solved with laser beams.
Public Service Announcement: If this had been an actual response to your thread, the feeble attempt at poor humor would have been followed by actual helpful advice. As this is likely not a helpful response in any measurable way, please simply consider the above post a free bump.
#45
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:05 AM
What about Kahlil Bell? Isn't he a restricted free agent?
will anyone give him an offer sheet??
#46
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:10 AM
Actually though, Bush probably wouldn't be on the field on what would be obvious "passing downs". As the short-yardage/goal line type guy, he would likely be either the guy they actually were handing the ball of to, or a decoy to set up a quick short pass.
how good is bush at picking up the blitz?![]()
good luck Cutler! duck & cover
As a Bears fan, I really like the addition. I think the Bears are a little more "depth-conscious" after last year's debacle after guys got dinged (bas QB play after Cutler went down, Barber's running out of bounds costing them the Denver game, etc.). The nice thing is that they are not just adding depth, but quality depth.
I think it's an addition you'll like as well. But don't discount Bush's receiving ability. It's no drop off from Forte. He'll average around 10ypc, as he has some nice wiggle in the open field. But if you want him to be the power fullback or short yardage guy, you'll be disappointed. I think Kahlil Bell is better at that than Bush. Bush fancies himself as a nimble runner and dances too much when the hole is open for a split second, instead of attacking it and doling punishment. For all his size, he's been given an unfair rep as a "power" runner, when he really is a larger, bulkier version of a Matt Forte. He's a good soldier, good teammate. Good person. I think you'll like the addition. But you need to use him the right way.
#47
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:11 AM
No. that would be Taiwan Jones, aka, the chris Johnson waiting to happen.
He averaged 3.8 ypc and slowed down tremendously late in the year....
As others posted above, he's just not that good.
Love marcel Reese now as a value play, in case DMC does not fare well from injury.
I am surprised that so many people are just assuming this is going to be a situation where Forte and Bush coincide in the same backfield.
Let me spin this yarn for you and see what you think: Let's say this lets the Bears get nasty with Forte and forte ends up somewhere else; let's say in new york with the Giants or Jets. Then maybye the Bears bring in a replacement that is , say, Ryan grant or Joey Addai or , heaven forbid, some way this ends up bringing DWIL or JSTEW there.
I guess I'm just saying this looks like a signing that sets other things in motion and it may be premature to assume what this means to the Bears or these players.
Doubtful. He's way too involved in the offense. He's not like other rbs that amount for 30% of the snaps. Forte is 75% of the snaps.
If Forte plays hardball, Chicago has an adequate replacement to come in and keep the offense moving. I don't think Bush is all-world, nor is he simply a pedestrian back. It appears he wore down last year, 3/4 of the year without DMac and with inexperienced rookies will do that to you. From week 7 on he had carries of 17, 19, 30, 30, 24, 10, 23,18, 23, 19. That is quite a stretch of carries for a 6-1, 245lb running back whose game is to run through rather than around and away from defenders. It is no wonder he wore down, to expect a big back like him NOT to wear down seems quite unrealistic. IF Forte plays hardball (I doubt he does---but one never knows) and sits out, Chicago will certainly take a good size step back, but they'll be able to roll with MB and Kahlil Bell until they get things worked out.
#48
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:11 AM
@MattForte22
There's only so many times a man that has done everything he's been asked to do can be disrespected! Guess the GOOD GUYS do finish last....
Matt should have held out last year. he has no leverage any more. he does have the right to be upset, but this is not the thing to say. bears offered him frank gore money and he thought he is worth more.
#49
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:13 AM
I play real sports....not trying to be the best at exercising
#50
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:15 AM
@MattForte22
There's only so many times a man that has done everything he's been asked to do can be disrespected! Guess the GOOD GUYS do finish last....
cue the violins.
Gotta love Twitter.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










