and eagles fans can kiss their playoff hopes next season good-bye!Eagles LT Jason Peters will undergo surgery April 2 for a ruptured Achilles suffered in a recent workout. Facing 9-12 months of rehab, Peters is certain to start the season on the PUP list -- if not miss the entirety of 2012. Graded as the best left tackle in football last season by Pro Football Focus as well as respected analysts, Peters is perhaps the team's most valuable player outside of Michael Vick. His loss puts a dent in the fantasy prospects of both Vick and LeSean McCoy. Backup King Dunlap represents a weak link an offensive line that figured to show continued improvement.
Drop all Eagles in your rankings
#1
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:00 AM
Those that can't see the indisputable proof are either CheatHawks fans, had money on the them, blind or all of the above.
The Redskins are SORE LOSERS
http://assets.sbnati...65603/trent.gif
#2
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:02 AM
What? No faith in King Dunlap?? But his first name is KING!!!!Per rotoworld
and eagles fans can kiss their playoff hopes next season good-bye!Eagles LT Jason Peters will undergo surgery April 2 for a ruptured Achilles suffered in a recent workout.
Facing 9-12 months of rehab, Peters is certain to start the season on the PUP list -- if not miss the entirety of 2012. Graded as the best left tackle in football last season by Pro Football Focus as well as respected analysts, Peters is perhaps the team's most valuable player outside of Michael Vick. His loss puts a dent in the fantasy prospects of both Vick and LeSean McCoy. Backup King Dunlap represents a weak link an offensive line that figured to show continued improvement.
statistics don't lie, just people who use them
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, just not their own set of facts.
Physical disabilities does NOT include obesity. Take the stairs, fattie.
I can't think of a single problem in life that can't be solved with laser beams.
Public Service Announcement: If this had been an actual response to your thread, the feeble attempt at poor humor would have been followed by actual helpful advice. As this is likely not a helpful response in any measurable way, please simply consider the above post a free bump.
#3
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:11 AM
Houston I think we have a problem.
#4
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:20 AM
2013 FBG cribbage most fun prize
#5
Posted 30 March 2012 - 09:27 AM
dream team
![]()
#6
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:06 AM
#7
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:17 AM
#8
Posted 30 March 2012 - 10:19 AM
LOL at the new CP. This is really awful news though, seriously. Peters was a big part of moving that offense. This will hurt them a lot.good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
#9
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:19 AM
The Eagles were third in the NFL averaging 5.1 yards per rush, so there's a long way down for them to go - I don't think that this loss is as devastating as it would have been during regular season (when Free Agency is long past and there are only 'street' guys or undrafted rookies around to pick up), but there is no doubt that losing Peters could move the Eagles back down closer to the "typical" NFL range of 4.1 to 4.2 yards per rush on average - say perhaps 4.5 or 4.4 per tote, which would still be top ten but not "elite". I think it'll especially hurt in the red-zone where the field gets compressed and there isn't as much opportunity for Vick and McCoy to burst into spaces...also Vick will have more pass pressure now unless the Eagles get a really top-shelf replacement for Peters...LOL at the new CP. This is really awful news though, seriously. Peters was a big part of moving that offense. This will hurt them a lot.good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
Got iPod/iTunes? Check out Footballguys' podcast "The Audible"
Proud Libertarian
One of My Heroes
More On Galileo
#10
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:24 AM
Should have to change it to couch potato fan imoLOL at the new CP.good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
#11
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:33 AM
The Eagles were 5th in rushing the past two seasons with Jason Peters and 22nd in rushing the two previous years. One of those years Peters was there but didn't play all games. I guess it is debatable but I think this is more impactful than what many may think.The Eagles were third in the NFL averaging 5.1 yards per rush, so there's a long way down for them to go - I don't think that this loss is as devastating as it would have been during regular season (when Free Agency is long past and there are only 'street' guys or undrafted rookies around to pick up), but there is no doubt that losing Peters could move the Eagles back down closer to the "typical" NFL range of 4.1 to 4.2 yards per rush on average - say perhaps 4.5 or 4.4 per tote, which would still be top ten but not "elite". I think it'll especially hurt in the red-zone where the field gets compressed and there isn't as much opportunity for Vick and McCoy to burst into spaces...also Vick will have more pass pressure now unless the Eagles get a really top-shelf replacement for Peters...
LOL at the new CP. This is really awful news though, seriously. Peters was a big part of moving that offense. This will hurt them a lot.good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
Edited by Shutout, 30 March 2012 - 11:34 AM.
#12
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:43 AM
What was the impact of a mobile Mike Vick on those rushing numbers? He's been the starter the last 2 seasons. Before that it was McNabb who didn't want to run.The Eagles were 5th in rushing the past two seasons with Jason Peters and 22nd in rushing the two previous years. One of those years Peters was there but didn't play all games. I guess it is debatable but I think this is more impactful than what many may think.
The Eagles were third in the NFL averaging 5.1 yards per rush, so there's a long way down for them to go - I don't think that this loss is as devastating as it would have been during regular season (when Free Agency is long past and there are only 'street' guys or undrafted rookies around to pick up), but there is no doubt that losing Peters could move the Eagles back down closer to the "typical" NFL range of 4.1 to 4.2 yards per rush on average - say perhaps 4.5 or 4.4 per tote, which would still be top ten but not "elite". I think it'll especially hurt in the red-zone where the field gets compressed and there isn't as much opportunity for Vick and McCoy to burst into spaces...also Vick will have more pass pressure now unless the Eagles get a really top-shelf replacement for Peters...
LOL at the new CP.
good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
This is really awful news though, seriously. Peters was a big part of moving that offense. This will hurt them a lot.
"There's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over."
"If you want to get laid, go to college. If you want an education, go to the library."
-Frank Zappa
#13
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:47 AM
Should have to change it to couch potato fan imo
LOL at the new CP.good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
#14
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:51 AM
#15
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:55 AM
In terms of YPC, they were #3 in 2011, #1 in 2010 (Vicks first year), #11 in 2009 (Peters' first year), and #21 in 2008 (prior to Peters or Vick).What was the impact of a mobile Mike Vick on those rushing numbers? He's been the starter the last 2 seasons. Before that it was McNabb who didn't want to run.
The Eagles were 5th in rushing the past two seasons with Jason Peters and 22nd in rushing the two previous years. One of those years Peters was there but didn't play all games. I guess it is debatable but I think this is more impactful than what many may think.
As for McCoy himself, he was 4.8 YPC in 2011, 5.2 YPC in 2010, 4.1 YPC in 2009, and prior to that it was Westy with his 4.0 YPC in 2008.
#16
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:56 AM
Vick?The Eagles were 5th in rushing the past two seasons with Jason Peters and 22nd in rushing the two previous years. One of those years Peters was there but didn't play all games. I guess it is debatable but I think this is more impactful than what many may think.
The Eagles were third in the NFL averaging 5.1 yards per rush, so there's a long way down for them to go - I don't think that this loss is as devastating as it would have been during regular season (when Free Agency is long past and there are only 'street' guys or undrafted rookies around to pick up), but there is no doubt that losing Peters could move the Eagles back down closer to the "typical" NFL range of 4.1 to 4.2 yards per rush on average - say perhaps 4.5 or 4.4 per tote, which would still be top ten but not "elite". I think it'll especially hurt in the red-zone where the field gets compressed and there isn't as much opportunity for Vick and McCoy to burst into spaces...also Vick will have more pass pressure now unless the Eagles get a really top-shelf replacement for Peters...
LOL at the new CP. This is really awful news though, seriously. Peters was a big part of moving that offense. This will hurt them a lot.good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
#17
Posted 30 March 2012 - 11:59 AM
#18
Posted 30 March 2012 - 12:02 PM
It could be worse. They have plenty of time left to fill the hole, with free agency, trades (Asante) and the draft all still possibilities.
I don't think it's anything to get worked up about, or to downgrade their players.
I agree with Doc that the success of their rushing attack the last two years has more to do with Vick's threat on the ground than with Peters. Sure he's good, but he's 31 and they would need to think about a replacement soon anyways. May as well start working on it now.
"There's a big difference between kneeling down and bending over."
"If you want to get laid, go to college. If you want an education, go to the library."
-Frank Zappa
#19
Posted 30 March 2012 - 12:31 PM
Edited by delusional, 30 March 2012 - 12:41 PM.
#20
Posted 30 March 2012 - 12:33 PM
I agree with you too
It could be worse. They have plenty of time left to fill the hole, with free agency, trades (Asante) and the draft all still possibilities.
I don't think it's anything to get worked up about, or to downgrade their players.
I agree with Doc that the success of their rushing attack the last two years has more to do with Vick's threat on the ground than with Peters. Sure he's good, but he's 31 and they would need to think about a replacement soon anyways. May as well start working on it now.
#21
Posted 30 March 2012 - 12:59 PM
Maybe he pronounces it po-tah-to.LOL at the new CP.good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
#22
Posted 30 March 2012 - 02:46 PM
lol at this awkward meeting of couch potatoes ...and at the quoteLOL at the new CP. This is really awful news though, seriously. Peters was a big part of moving that offense. This will hurt them a lot.good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
#23
Posted 30 March 2012 - 06:57 PM
#24
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:22 PM
#25
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:22 PM
#26
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:24 PM
The guy's neck is jacked. IIRC he was nearly paralyzed in a game this year. OL poor SD released him and OL poor DET said no thanks.Anyone know what the deal with Marcus McNeill is? Any word on his neck? I assume if he was healthy he woudl be getting much more attention.
#27
Posted 30 March 2012 - 07:42 PM
Hmm, looks like former VP candidate Dan Quayle has joined FBG Your fans run in elite circles Bruce. LOLShould have to change it to couch potato fan imo
LOL at the new CP.good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
2008 SSL3 Runner Up
2009 SSL1 3rd place
2009 Shark Pool Survivor Week 17 - 17/583 finish
2010 SSL1 Runner Up
#28
Posted 30 March 2012 - 08:55 PM
Should have to change it to couch potato fan imo
LOL at the new CP.good thing vick is a lefty then, so he can see it coming
![]()
Edited by BigTex, 30 March 2012 - 08:55 PM.
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain..."
#29
Posted 31 March 2012 - 02:40 AM
It's terrible news, I've said as much in this thread, the Eagles thread and on Twitter. But it's not a season ender. Few things would be.Wood you are the eternal optimist.
#30
Posted 31 March 2012 - 05:46 AM
#31
Posted 04 April 2012 - 08:04 AM
#32
Posted 04 April 2012 - 10:44 AM
#33
Posted 04 April 2012 - 10:48 AM
Edited by SelenaCat, 04 April 2012 - 10:49 AM.
#34
Posted 04 April 2012 - 10:54 AM
#35
Posted 04 April 2012 - 11:03 AM
#36
Posted 04 April 2012 - 11:14 AM
From what I'm reading, it's supposedly a pretty front-loaded deal with not much money guaranteed beyond 2012, so doesn't look like they're trying to make a long-term committment to him. Even if everything was going perfectly, McCoy would still have a helluva job repeating a 20 TD, top 2 fantasy finish. Just hoping this doesn't drag him down too much. I would suspect Vick is the one in a lot more trouble unless they jell quickly. Thank god for football in general and fantasy in particular that this is going to be a normal season with OTA's and training camp and plenty of lead time to get organized.But since it's a 5 year deal, what does that say about Peter's being an Eagle long term? He's due $10.4M next year I believe.
Edited by Superdbs, 04 April 2012 - 11:15 AM.
#37
Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:07 PM
#38
Posted 04 April 2012 - 03:21 PM
Two things I love about this post: 1) The use of "we" when referring to the team. What position do you play again?The deal appears to be a one-year deal with a team option to make it a longer-term deal if Bell's "tryout" this year goes well. Signing him, particularly if we aren't committed beyond this year, is a much better move than doing nothing. Is he Jason Peters? Certainly not, few are. But is he better than King Dunlap? OF COURSE.
statistics don't lie, just people who use them
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, just not their own set of facts.
Physical disabilities does NOT include obesity. Take the stairs, fattie.
I can't think of a single problem in life that can't be solved with laser beams.
Public Service Announcement: If this had been an actual response to your thread, the feeble attempt at poor humor would have been followed by actual helpful advice. As this is likely not a helpful response in any measurable way, please simply consider the above post a free bump.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










