Jump to content


Photo

Will Roger Goodell create a Civil War in the NFL?


  • Please log in to reply
207 replies to this topic

#1 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:00 PM

When these suspensions start coming for players which I am adamantly against since it was the coaches who put the orders in and players were just following orders. You can debate it, if it sickens you what they did, more power to you. I don't condone it but I'm fine with Goodell going after the coaches and GM for now. I think the punishments are harsh but as long as the folks being punished are taking it on the chin for the players involved, I'm fine with it.

 

The President of the Players' Union was very vocal about Goodell seeming like he had already reached some decisions and punishments for players. If Goodell suspended players for a year like he did with Payton, or even half a season...this could really be the tipping point for some of these guys. I do feel like I am in the minority camp these days with a bad taste in my mouth for what Goodell has done. A lot of posters however in the last year have bought in hook line and sinker to what Goodell has done to the game. He really had to take a backseat last year with the lockout and now it seems he is out for blood.

 

Goodell caters to the casual fan and doesn't give 2 spits about the hard core NFL fans and maybe eventually people will get their fill of this and see that Goodell does not care about the players, just the almighty $$$. I don't like it, I'm getting tired of it, and at some point some of us are going to go away. Some already have although ratings I'm sure do not reflect that. I can get behind a league that is looking out for player safety but it's a load of horsespit and I have been very vocal that if they really care about the players they will put in weight restriction limits so we don't have 360 lb Nose Tackles falling on 200 lb RBs.

 

The spread over the last 25 years has gotten way out of control and the players destroy their bodies, many of them die early in life from a variety of medical conditions. So don't sit there on your high horse feeling better for quenching your thrist for blood, the same as the Romans did 2,000 years ago, you cannot sit there with a straight face and say that Goodell is genuinely concerned about the players...he is concerned for certain players, elite QBs that pack the stadiums and TV ratings.

 

It's going to take a few key media and sports pundits to get vocal about this and show Goodell for what he really is. For now things seem rosy but guys like Gruden last year going toe to toe with Tirico in the booth. Now we have to allow the receivers a chance to catch the ball and make a football move...so then we should allow RBs to get a full head of steam going and not touch them until they reach the LOS right? Let's just put flags on the players and run a 7 on 7 which will slash payrolls and then they can just run 5 WRs out every play and the QBs can throw for 7,500 yds and 60 TDs. That's crazy talk, no one would ever change the game into a strictly passing league where the fundamental idea of moving an oblong ball made of pigskin 3-4 yds at a time with grown men fighting and scrumming along the line on both sides of the ball...that would never change would it?


Edited by Ministry of Pain, 18 October 2013 - 05:26 AM.

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 




#2 OrangeCurtain

OrangeCurtain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 298 posts
  • Joined 10-October 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:05 PM

Sorry dude, but they weren't following orders based on the info comin out. They were actively participating and contributing. Big difference.

#3 identikit

identikit

    Footballguy

  • RMT Beta Tester
  • Pip
  • 10,256 posts
  • Joined 12-December 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:29 Cove Road

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:06 PM

No to pretty much all of this. Because we'll all support (go to/watch/buy stuff) the game.

Edited by identikit, 04 April 2012 - 12:11 PM.


Chachi: FAIL Ever heard of a smokescreen?


"Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, and ideas are bullet-proof."
--V

#4 identikit

identikit

    Footballguy

  • RMT Beta Tester
  • Pip
  • 10,256 posts
  • Joined 12-December 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:29 Cove Road

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:07 PM

And I generally like the job Goodell has done/is doing.

Chachi: FAIL Ever heard of a smokescreen?


"Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, and ideas are bullet-proof."
--V

#5 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:07 PM

Sorry dude, but they weren't following orders based on the info comin out. They were actively participating and contributing. Big difference.

They didn't organize it, that seemed to come from above. Willis from SF was on CC today, would not comment and it sounded as if there is going to be some very stiff penalties coming for the players involved. I'm sorry but a good leader or coach would root that out and put a stop to it. Players are like kids, they typically are a reflection of the coach with a few exceptions.

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 


#6 Statcruncher

Statcruncher

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4,865 posts
  • Joined 04-September 07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:09 PM

There has got to be something in your life more deserving of anger than this.

#7 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:10 PM

There has got to be something in your life more deserving of anger than this.

I've mellowed

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 


#8 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:13 PM

Those that love what Goodell has done...what has he done exactly that you like? Do you like that he treats the players like felons from Leavenworth? Do you like that he is putting a stop or curtailing the violence in the game? Willis did say on CC today that he has no idea what is legal and not legal in the NFL anymore, he also said he does not understand why the league wants them to aim low on the legs where they can potentially end a career vs a hit in the chest area which typically does not threaten the career of most players.

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 


#9 GroveDiesel

GroveDiesel

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 26,191 posts
  • Joined 24-February 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Jersey

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:13 PM

Seriously man, you need some anger management counseling or something. If you don't like the product, then don't watch. Go find something else to enjoy in your life. If the NFL is that important in your life to get THAT worked up, then maybe you need to take some time off and re-evaluate your priorities anyway.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. - John Adams

#10 outlawassassins

outlawassassins

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 127 posts
  • Joined 07-September 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Virginia
  • Interests:miami dolphins, boston red sox, boston celtics, unc tarheels basketball, miami hurricanes football, dale earnhardt jr. , money, fantasy sports..<br /><br />

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:14 PM

Goodell caters to the casual fan and doesn't give 2 spits about the hard core NFL fans and maybe eventually people will get their fill of this and see that Goodell does not care about the players, just the almighty $$$.

Your right about one thing, Goodell caters to the casual fan, BUT.. that's part of his job. You see, it IS all about money, and the NFL really rakes in off of the casual fan. They already have the hardcore fan (US).. we're going to tune in no matter what, we're going to buy merchandise no matter what, and we're going to play fantasy football no matter what. We are the hardcore fan, we are their standard, we already are figured into the profits. The CASUAL fan is where the money is at, because the casual fan creates the spike in tv ratings, the spike in merchandise sales, the spike in everything, etc. So yes, Goodell is going to cater to the casual fan, because he wants more revenue for the league.
If you sit around and wait for it to happen, its going to happen..its just going to happen for somebody else!

#11 Fallerjw

Fallerjw

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6,200 posts
  • Joined 31-July 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:15 PM

I hope he suspends Scott Fujita so he doesn't end up on the field for the Browns this year. :bag:

Edited by Fallerjw, 04 April 2012 - 12:15 PM.

The most important single central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit. Milton Friedman

A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. Milton Friedman



#12 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:19 PM

Seriously man, you need some anger management counseling or something. If you don't like the product, then don't watch. Go find something else to enjoy in your life. If the NFL is that important in your life to get THAT worked up, then maybe you need to take some time off and re-evaluate your priorities anyway.

:lol: And I have issues because I am speaking out against Goodell?

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 


#13 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:20 PM

Goodell caters to the casual fan and doesn't give 2 spits about the hard core NFL fans and maybe eventually people will get their fill of this and see that Goodell does not care about the players, just the almighty $$.

Your right about one thing, Goodell caters to the casual fan, BUT.. that's part of his job. You see, it IS all about money, and the NFL really rakes in off of the casual fan. They already have the hardcore fan (US).. we're going to tune in no matter what, we're going to buy merchandise no matter what, and we're going to play fantasy football no matter what. We are the hardcore fan, we are their standard, we already are figured into the profits. The CASUAL fan is where the money is at, because the casual fan creates the spike in tv ratings, the spike in merchandise sales, the spike in everything, etc. So yes, Goodell is going to cater to the casual fan, because he wants more revenue for the league.

NP but let's call a spade a spade and not say MOP has anger management issues. I think Goodell has the anger management issues myself.

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 


#14 identikit

identikit

    Footballguy

  • RMT Beta Tester
  • Pip
  • 10,256 posts
  • Joined 12-December 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:29 Cove Road

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:35 PM

Goodell caters to the casual fan and doesn't give 2 spits about the hard core NFL fans and maybe eventually people will get their fill of this and see that Goodell does not care about the players, just the almighty $.

Your right about one thing, Goodell caters to the casual fan, BUT.. that's part of his job. You see, it IS all about money, and the NFL really rakes in off of the casual fan. They already have the hardcore fan (US).. we're going to tune in no matter what, we're going to buy merchandise no matter what, and we're going to play fantasy football no matter what. We are the hardcore fan, we are their standard, we already are figured into the profits. The CASUAL fan is where the money is at, because the casual fan creates the spike in tv ratings, the spike in merchandise sales, the spike in everything, etc. So yes, Goodell is going to cater to the casual fan, because he wants more revenue for the league.

NP but let's call a spade a spade and not say MOP has anger management issues. I think Goodell has the anger management issues myself.

Mop in the third person. Oy.

Chachi: FAIL Ever heard of a smokescreen?


"Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, and ideas are bullet-proof."
--V

#15 Gawain

Gawain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2,695 posts
  • Joined 17-July 11

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:39 PM

The players do not have the power to individually stand up to Goodell. They can threaten a strike, but as we saw with the CBA negotiating, the players don't seem willing to miss any time. If there really is a fissure in the NFL, such a crack will come from an action such as the one he took against the Skins and the Cowboys.
2011 FBG Ultimate Survivor Champion

#16 the turnip

the turnip

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 350 posts
  • Joined 12-March 07

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:50 PM

If you seriously think the NFL bears any resemblance to what went on in the Roman coliseums, you need a history lesson.

#17 Amused to Death

Amused to Death

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5,242 posts
  • Joined 13-August 09
  • Location:742 Evergreen Terrace

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:54 PM

The players may have also lied to Goodell during his investigation. Lying, more than the bounty itself, is what got the team in so much trouble with the league. The team and possibly players lied (allegedly) many times to Goodell over several years. If Goodell called in some key players during his investigation and asked them if a bounty system - funded and endorsed by the organization - existed and they said no, they're getting suspended.

"In the land of cubicles, the man with two monitors is king. I pity my uni-monitor subjects, but I can not respect them." - Dilbert
 
"You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding toward oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe" - Dogbert


#18 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:56 PM

If you seriously think the NFL bears any resemblance to what went on in the Roman coliseums, you need a history lesson.

:thumbdown:

Edited by Ministry of Pain, 04 April 2012 - 12:56 PM.

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 


#19 MDSkinner

MDSkinner

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1,585 posts
  • Joined 23-November 05

Posted 04 April 2012 - 12:57 PM

Your argument here seems pretty similar to the movie "A Few Good Men" and the argument that they defense made for their guys. They lost, though not as badly as did the people who were giving them the orders. In this case, I think it should be similar where the coaches are handled more harshly, but I also think that the players doing it is wrong and I am not opposed to them being punished at a lesser level either. JMO.

#20 Devine Intervention

Devine Intervention

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 529 posts
  • Joined 04-March 08

Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:01 PM

I agree to what MOP is saying to some extent. I do not think Goodell is good for the sport. He is all business and money. Yes, I know this is a business, but just because you have people hooked does not mean its ok to sell them junk now that they arent going anywhere. Its like once you get married and you know your wife wont leave you, you can just be the biggest ##### ever. This is a dangerous game and its disappointing that they aren't allowed to play the game its meant to be played. The risk of injury is in part why its exciting and in part why they get paid so much. I work doing construction and it beats my body up. BUT I chose that career and I know the consequences. That's just life. Goodell need to let them play the game its meant to be played and stop feeding us crap because he knows we'll eat it up.

#21 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:02 PM

Your argument here seems pretty similar to the movie "A Few Good Men" and the argument that they defense made for their guys. They lost, though not as badly as did the people who were giving them the orders. In this case, I think it should be similar where the coaches are handled more harshly, but I also think that the players doing it is wrong and I am not opposed to them being punished at a lesser level either. JMO.

Anything more than 2-4 games will create a lot of backlash.

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 


#22 GroveDiesel

GroveDiesel

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 26,191 posts
  • Joined 24-February 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Jersey

Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:05 PM

Look, the NFL can't put size or weight limits in. They would immediately get sued and lose for discrimination. Plus there is no way you could accurately quantify something like that. Re: hitting low versus hitting high; a guy may have his career ended by a knee injury, but the worst case scenario long term is pain in that knee and maybe some trouble walking. The high hits have shown to lead to long term brain damage that can go so far as to cause depression and lead to suicide. Which one is really worse, ending your career because of a knee injury, or having permanent brain damage? (and clearly high hits that lead to concussions lead to ended careers as well. Probably more often than knee injuries with today's advances in knee surgeries). The NFL has numerous optional safety equipment ranging from new helmets to lots of padding. Many players choose not to use them. That's not on the NFL. Maybe it should be mandatory, but it's hard to blame Goodell over the players on that one as well. Lastly, I think it's fair to blame the Saints coaches over the players. But that doesn't mean the players deserve no blame. In fact, there have been tons of comments from former and current players saying that bounties or other reward payments and the such go on between players all over the league. The Saints situation happens to be more egregious because it was managed by the team and because it explicitly involved encouraging players to intentionally injure other players. I have no problem with Goodell trying to get rid of the really dangerous hits. Where I think they're messing up is not going back and altering the pass interference rules. Defensive backs just have no chance now. They need to allow contact throughout the whole play. Keep holding so that they can't actually hold a guy, but allow them to bump and hit a guy the whole way. That will immediately balance things out and defensive players will have no need to whine about not being allowed to deliver big hits to dislodge balls anymore because they can bump and hit a guy enough to break up a pass without delivering a big hit.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. - John Adams

#23 massraider

massraider

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 16,920 posts
  • Joined 22-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upper East Side

Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:25 PM

Goodell is exactly what the NFL needs in a commish right now. Probably the best commish since Rozelle. You can be a commish of an incredibly violent sport, and still do all you can for player safety. The two are not mutually exclusive. It's funny the claims he really doesn't care about player safety, yet there has been a massive uproar, every week last season, about how pansy the league has become. I am not really sure what else a commish could do to prove that he was serious about player safety. The bounty thing needed to be nipped in the bud. The punishments needed to be harsh, so the NFL never needs to deal with this again. This was a whole bunch of negative press that the NFL doesn't want to deal with again. They had to make an example out of the Saints, set a precedent. Thank God it was the Saints, a league darling, so we didn't have to hear that Goodell had it in for the team in question (aside from one lunatic on the board here). Size limits? Ha. It's the speed that causes the collision, we should tie all the defensive players shoelaces together, that'd fix it.

#24 Wadsworth

Wadsworth

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4,303 posts
  • Joined 24-September 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:36 PM

Roger is doing a fine job protecting the shield and the game.
"I will say unequivocally that (Gabbert) will not make it in this league as a starting NFL quarterback." -Greg Cosell

"I readily admit my mistake(on Gabbert). Now the Jags need to do the same. The longer they play him, they run the risk of losing the team." -Michael Lombardi

#25 identikit

identikit

    Footballguy

  • RMT Beta Tester
  • Pip
  • 10,256 posts
  • Joined 12-December 06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:29 Cove Road

Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:40 PM

Goodell is exactly what the NFL needs in a commish right now. Probably the best commish since Rozelle.

You can be a commish of an incredibly violent sport, and still do all you can for player safety. The two are not mutually exclusive. It's funny the claims he really doesn't care about player safety, yet there has been a massive uproar, every week last season, about how pansy the league has become. I am not really sure what else a commish could do to prove that he was serious about player safety.

The bounty thing needed to be nipped in the bud. The punishments needed to be harsh, so the NFL never needs to deal with this again. This was a whole bunch of negative press that the NFL doesn't want to deal with again. They had to make an example out of the Saints, set a precedent. Thank God it was the Saints, a league darling, so we didn't have to hear that Goodell had it in for the team in question (aside from one lunatic on the board here).

Size limits? Ha. It's the speed that causes the collision, we should tie all the defensive players shoelaces together, that'd fix it.

:goodposting:

Especially the bolded.

Chachi: FAIL Ever heard of a smokescreen?


"Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, and ideas are bullet-proof."
--V

#26 beef

beef

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6,251 posts
  • Joined 22-May 03
  • Location:a cow

Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:41 PM

Congrats MOP, on starting the most ridiculous thread in the entire internets, ever!

#27 wdcrob

wdcrob

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 12,709 posts
  • Joined 15-July 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:46 PM

IMO the people criticizing Goodell don't really understand the size and nature of the challenge the NFL is facing with the concussion issue. Bountygate directly undermined everything the NFL is (belatedly) trying to do and there was no way it wasn't going to be dealt with harshly. And I think the same goes for the fines for late/cheap hits. If anything he's let too much go and will probably start handing out more suspensions.
Seven Rounds in April (@7RoundsInApril)
Updated Rookie Rankings (7/4)

Adam Harstad, on 21 Aug 2014: There was no fantasy before the nerds started playing. Who do you think sat around and thought "man, football is great, but I think I'd like it a lot more if two days later I could meticulously tabulate all of the statistics of a predetermined set of players by hand and compare those directly against the statistics of another predetermined set of players assembled by someone else to determine which of us was better able to predict player performances"?


#28 Wadsworth

Wadsworth

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4,303 posts
  • Joined 24-September 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 01:47 PM

IMO the people criticizing Goodell don't really understand the size and nature of the challenge the NFL is facing with the concussion issue. Bountygate directly undermined everything the NFL is (belatedly) trying to do and there was no way it wasn't going to be dealt with harshly. And I think the same goes for the fines for late/cheap hits. If anything he's let too much go and will probably start handing out more suspensions.


:goodposting:

Get over it or join MoP's civil war. :)
"I will say unequivocally that (Gabbert) will not make it in this league as a starting NFL quarterback." -Greg Cosell

"I readily admit my mistake(on Gabbert). Now the Jags need to do the same. The longer they play him, they run the risk of losing the team." -Michael Lombardi

#29 Greg Russell

Greg Russell

    Footballguy

  • Staff
  • Pip
  • 7,976 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2012 - 02:14 PM

I think in general the types of changes Goodell has made have been good or at least with good intent. Where he deserves a lot of criticism is in poor explanation, implementation, and consistency.

When these suspensions start coming for players which I am adamantly against since it was the coaches who put the orders in and players were just following orders. ... If Goodell suspended players for a year like he did with Payton, or even half a season

If there is solid evidence on Vilma and the $10k bounty, he should count himself lucky if he doesn't do jail time. I expect player punishments will be less than coach punishments with the exception of anyone like Vilma.

I can get behind a league that is looking out for player safety but it's a load of horsespit ... you cannot sit there with a straight face and say that Goodell is genuinely concerned about the players...he is concerned for certain players, elite QBs that pack the stadiums and TV ratings.

I see rule changes that protect grunts and special team players too, and do nothing to cater to any fan, casual or hard core. I would have a very hard time saying the NFL isn't showing concern for the health of players beyond elite QBs. I'd have to intentionally ignore much of what they'd done to come to such a conclusion.

Now we have to allow the receivers a chance to catch the ball and make a football move...

No, you don't. I'm sure you know the rules well enough to know that isn't the case. If you don't, search the forum and I posted the NFL's video showing what are legal and illegal hits. It's really very simple, don't hit a defenseless player in the head or neck, and don't spear with your helmet. That's not just a good rule, it's a GREAT ####### RULE. Like I said to start this post, the failing of the NFL is in things like not coming out with the video before the season so it's clear, and not stopping it quickly when the refs were calling the penalty whenever in doubt. The same problem happened with the new rules about blows to the QB's head 2-3 years ago. The next year the NFL emphasized it be a forceful blow, i.e. something likely to injure. The result, most of those flags that weren't needed to increase player safety went away. I hope the same will happen with defenseless receivers as it goes to its second year, and they will rein things back a little. But the basis of the rule is a great one. If you can't separate a receiver from the ball without having to hit him in his head, you don't deserve to be on an NFL field. They just need to have refs call it when they are sure, and huddle to make sure the call is correct. None of that has anything to do with Goodell having no concern for players. He just hasn't been good in rolling things out, and has sucked at being consistent in his punishment rulings. Those aren't character flaws that make him someone to demonize though.

"When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is." - Oscar Wilde

Click to follow me on Twitter.

 


#30 duaneok66

duaneok66

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8,774 posts
  • Joined 23-July 06

Posted 04 April 2012 - 03:42 PM

the punishments were warranted - people conveniently forget that part of the reason that the suspensions were so stiff were that the NFL was lied to and that a promise to stop was not kept.

#31 Borat

Borat

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8,027 posts
  • Joined 10-January 06

Posted 04 April 2012 - 03:45 PM

No, he won't. What a ridiculous suggestion.

#32 Mile High

Mile High

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,577 posts
  • Joined 19-April 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:5280

Posted 04 April 2012 - 03:53 PM

Your argument here seems pretty similar to the movie "A Few Good Men" and the argument that they defense made for their guys. They lost, though not as badly as did the people who were giving them the orders. In this case, I think it should be similar where the coaches are handled more harshly, but I also think that the players doing it is wrong and I am not opposed to them being punished at a lesser level either. JMO.

Anything more than 2-4 games will create a lot of backlash.

From who? The players who were at risk of being hurt? The fans who could watch as one their star players was carted off the field?

#33 cobalt_27

cobalt_27

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15,160 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2012 - 04:08 PM

There has got to be something in your life more deserving of anger than this.

I've mellowed

Not much evidence of this in this thread. BTW, you're not thinking straight. Goodell has to--and will--come down extremely hard on Vilma, especially. Others will get theirs, as well. As it should be. As it DEFINITELY should be. These are not drones, and they were not forced by anybody to do anything to anyone. Players have to take responsibility as men for behaving like neanderthals. Sorry, you're just way off base here, and I'm not sure what your issue is. As always.

take a gander to the left at my member number


#34 cobalt_27

cobalt_27

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15,160 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2012 - 04:11 PM

The players may have also lied to Goodell during his investigation. Lying, more than the bounty itself, is what got the team in so much trouble with the league. The team and possibly players lied (allegedly) many times to Goodell over several years.

If Goodell called in some key players during his investigation and asked them if a bounty system - funded and endorsed by the organization - existed and they said no, they're getting suspended.

In a big way, too. As they should be. MOP has not really thought this through.

take a gander to the left at my member number


#35 cobalt_27

cobalt_27

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15,160 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2012 - 04:13 PM

I think it's time to start considering Goodell as a great commissioner, to be honest.

take a gander to the left at my member number


#36 DoubleG

DoubleG

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 9,788 posts
  • Joined 03-June 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicaco

Posted 04 April 2012 - 04:30 PM

Sorry MOP, but I just don;t agree with...well, pretty much anything you said.

As many have posted, Goodell is dead on - and really is almost forced to come down hard, given the fact that the NFL investigated this 2 years ago and was bold-face lied to.

And most people are hardly "up in arms" about this as you seem to be...for some unknown reason.

:shrug:

statistics don't lie, just people who use them


Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, just not their own set of facts.

Physical disabilities does NOT include obesity. Take the stairs, fattie.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I can't think of a single problem in life that can't be solved with laser beams.



Public Service Announcement: If this had been an actual response to your thread, the feeble attempt at poor humor would have been followed by actual helpful advice. As this is likely not a helpful response in any measurable way, please simply consider the above post a free bump.

#37 Devine Intervention

Devine Intervention

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 529 posts
  • Joined 04-March 08

Posted 04 April 2012 - 04:34 PM

IMO the people criticizing Goodell don't really understand the size and nature of the challenge the NFL is facing with the concussion issue. Bountygate directly undermined everything the NFL is (belatedly) trying to do and there was no way it wasn't going to be dealt with harshly. And I think the same goes for the fines for late/cheap hits. If anything he's let too much go and will probably start handing out more suspensions.

I agree that late and dirty hits need to be addressed seriously. But when you start taking away from the game of football is when it becomes a problem. When games are decided by somebody's hand grazing a QBs helmet or a DB putting a clean stick on a WR, or silly penalties that are clean football hits, thats when its gone too far. Where does it end? The only way to truly get injuries out of the NFL is to make it flag football. This is a CONTACT sport, you know the risk, you chose to play or not. Boxing is a contact sport. If your concerned with concussion then DONT BOX! Your not going to take punching out of boxing because the risk it puts the athletes in. Football players all know the risks that are current when playing the game and they have made an educated decision that the reward is greater than the risk. And don't even get me started on the fines! Where does all this money go that is fined for big hits?? And what is with all the fines for the wrong socks, or equipment? Does no one find it a little ridiculous the NFL is on being so controlling and handing fines out so often? I just feel like he is like a controlling big brother who gets all huffy and puffy when people arent doing what he says. I just feel like its all about the money and how you can fine the crap out of people for hitting someone. If its really about the players safety dont make it all about the money. Start suspending players for lengths of the game or even full games, not just charge them 75,000 dollars and let them back in the game.

#38 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 04:36 PM

Congrats MOP, on starting the most ridiculous thread in the entire internets, ever!

That's been posted before in my threads. I seem to set World Records every time I touch the keys.

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 


#39 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 04:52 PM

People are just focusing on the Bountygate, but it's a lot more than that. I agree the punishments for the coaches and the GM should have been very severe and they were. Others have already posted that they accept that Goodell doesn't care about most of the true fans, much more concerned with corporations, commercials, and printing money. That proves my point that people are going to eat it up no matter how much Goodell changes the fabric of the game. On a side note: May I ask why some posters feel the need to turn threads personal? You may not like the topic and I may very well be in the minority which doesn't bother me so it shouldn't bother you either. Conversations can be boring if everyone feels the same way about things. I'm sorry if I stir animosity, that's not my intention. I write with some passion, if I didn't I wouldn't write it and most of you wouldn't either. Let's not make this about any one poster. I'm not alone in my view but I understand if it's not the popular view. Thanks :banned:

Edited by Ministry of Pain, 04 April 2012 - 04:52 PM.

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 


#40 cobalt_27

cobalt_27

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15,160 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2012 - 05:07 PM

People are just focusing on the Bountygate, but it's a lot more than that. I agree the punishments for the coaches and the GM should have been very severe and they were. Others have already posted that they accept that Goodell doesn't care about most of the true fans, much more concerned with corporations, commercials, and printing money. That proves my point that people are going to eat it up no matter how much Goodell changes the fabric of the game. On a side note: May I ask why some posters feel the need to turn threads personal? You may not like the topic and I may very well be in the minority which doesn't bother me so it shouldn't bother you either. Conversations can be boring if everyone feels the same way about things. I'm sorry if I stir animosity, that's not my intention. I write with some passion, if I didn't I wouldn't write it and most of you wouldn't either. Let's not make this about any one poster. I'm not alone in my view but I understand if it's not the popular view. Thanks :banned:

I have no personal beef with the fact that you are the timchochet of the SP. You do a good job imitating him. Are you an alias?

take a gander to the left at my member number


#41 SelenaCat

SelenaCat

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 470 posts
  • Joined 31-May 04

Posted 04 April 2012 - 05:11 PM

I think in general the types of changes Goodell has made have been good or at least with good intent. Where he deserves a lot of criticism is in poor explanation, implementation, and consistency. ... None of that has anything to do with Goodell having no concern for players. He just hasn't been good in rolling things out, and has sucked at being consistent in his punishment rulings. Those aren't character flaws that make him someone to demonize though.

:goodposting: It's entirely possible to make the game less dangerous while still preserving the intent in the game. If you're looking for gladiator-style hits, you're out of luck, but it's entirely possible to make an exciting game that makes a genuine effort to leave its players still functional past the age of 40.

#42 Abspara

Abspara

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 492 posts
  • Joined 05-August 11

Posted 04 April 2012 - 05:14 PM

I think it's time to start considering Goodell as a great commissioner, to be honest.

:goodposting:

#43 massraider

massraider

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 16,920 posts
  • Joined 22-March 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Upper East Side

Posted 04 April 2012 - 05:50 PM

On a side note: May I ask why some posters feel the need to turn threads personal?

Because, like Tim, you come across as a self-important windbag, in love with the sound of his own voice. I am not saying you are a self-important windbag, I am only answering your question. You often appear condescending, and people are probably wondering why you felt the need to start a thread to repeat a sentiment that has repeated, ad infinitum, in the bounty thread. Then, you make it worse by wondering why people get after you, and talk about writing with "passion", and gosh, if that makes people uncomfortable, I dunno what I can do. Do you have no self-awareness at all? I have told you before, MOP, you are better than 90% of the posters here, in terms of adding to the Pool, but geez.

#44 Jake22

Jake22

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 363 posts
  • Joined 13-October 07

Posted 04 April 2012 - 05:59 PM

I think it's time to start considering Goodell as a great commissioner, to be honest.

Really? Goodell could'nt even announce the draft correctly his first year as commish. He started out the draft by saying "with the first pick in the draft, the Oakland Raiders take...".
Teams don't "take" players they "select" them, it wasn't until about 15 picks later that someone finally told him he looked like an idiot up there and he switched to the proper way...and BTW I agree with the OP.

#45 cobalt_27

cobalt_27

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15,160 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2012 - 06:00 PM


I think it's time to start considering Goodell as a great commissioner, to be honest.

Really? Goodell could'nt even announce the draft correctly his first year as commish. He started out the draft by saying "with the first pick in the draft, the Oakland Raiders take...".
Teams don't "take" players they "select" them, it wasn't until about 15 picks later that someone finally told him he looked like an idiot up there and he switched to the proper way...and BTW I agree with the OP.

Well, when you raise such a critical point like this, I must reconsider.

take a gander to the left at my member number


#46 Jake22

Jake22

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 363 posts
  • Joined 13-October 07

Posted 04 April 2012 - 06:07 PM



I think it's time to start considering Goodell as a great commissioner, to be honest.

Really? Goodell could'nt even announce the draft correctly his first year as commish. He started out the draft by saying "with the first pick in the draft, the Oakland Raiders take...".
Teams don't "take" players they "select" them, it wasn't until about 15 picks later that someone finally told him he looked like an idiot up there and he switched to the proper way...and BTW I agree with the OP.

Well, when you raise such a critical point like this, I must reconsider.

Not a critical point, but the point is that for such a job as the stature of running the NFL as commissioner, you would think that person could at least get something like that correct his first draft. If I was running a company and hired a CEO to represent my company, I wouldn't want the guy looking like an idiot the first time he gets in front of a microphone and in front of millions of viewers on TV, that would make me have second thoughts immediately...

#47 duaneok66

duaneok66

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8,774 posts
  • Joined 23-July 06

Posted 04 April 2012 - 06:08 PM




I think it's time to start considering Goodell as a great commissioner, to be honest.

Really? Goodell could'nt even announce the draft correctly his first year as commish. He started out the draft by saying "with the first pick in the draft, the Oakland Raiders take...".
Teams don't "take" players they "select" them, it wasn't until about 15 picks later that someone finally told him he looked like an idiot up there and he switched to the proper way...and BTW I agree with the OP.

Well, when you raise such a critical point like this, I must reconsider.

Not a critical point, but the point is that for such a job as the stature of running the NFL as commissioner, you would think that person could at least get something like that correct his first draft. If I was running a company and hired a CEO to represent my company, I wouldn't want the guy looking like an idiot the first time he gets in front of a microphone and in front of millions of viewers on TV, that would make me have second thoughts immediately...


just went you thought that this thread had hit rock bottom . . .

#48 Multiple Scores

Multiple Scores

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3,213 posts
  • Joined 15-March 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Clayton, CA

Posted 04 April 2012 - 06:10 PM

####### FAIL

#49 Ministry of Pain

Ministry of Pain

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 46,901 posts
  • Joined 14-April 03

Posted 04 April 2012 - 06:33 PM


I think it's time to start considering Goodell as a great commissioner, to be honest.

Really? Goodell could'nt even announce the draft correctly his first year as commish. He started out the draft by saying "with the first pick in the draft, the Oakland Raiders take...".
Teams don't "take" players they "select" them, it wasn't until about 15 picks later that someone finally told him he looked like an idiot up there and he switched to the proper way...and BTW I agree with the OP.

Join the Revolution!

:suds:

"If this is the best God can do, I am not impressed. Results like this do not belong on the resume of a supreme being. This is the kind of sh-t you expect from an office temp with a bad attitude." -George Carlin R.I.P.

 

 

C=πd

A=πr(squared)

 

Cherry Pie Delicious, Apple Pies r 2 


#50 cobalt_27

cobalt_27

    Footballguy

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 15,160 posts
  • Joined 11-April 03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 April 2012 - 06:39 PM




I think it's time to start considering Goodell as a great commissioner, to be honest.

Really? Goodell could'nt even announce the draft correctly his first year as commish. He started out the draft by saying "with the first pick in the draft, the Oakland Raiders take...".
Teams don't "take" players they "select" them, it wasn't until about 15 picks later that someone finally told him he looked like an idiot up there and he switched to the proper way...and BTW I agree with the OP.

Well, when you raise such a critical point like this, I must reconsider.

Not a critical point, but the point is that for such a job as the stature of running the NFL as commissioner, you would think that person could at least get something like that correct his first draft. If I was running a company and hired a CEO to represent my company, I wouldn't want the guy looking like an idiot the first time he gets in front of a microphone and in front of millions of viewers on TV, that would make me have second thoughts immediately...

Yeah. I think I got your point the first time. It's really the centerpiece of a good commissioner, one I hadn't quite considered before. Does a team take a player or does a team select a player. Very helpful that you alerted us to this important distinction and amateurish oversight by Mr. Goodell.

take a gander to the left at my member number





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users