This is the strangest class of defensive line prospects in recent memory.
Though the list of potential impact prospects that will get a look in the first two rounds is long, I don’t think there’s an elite edge rushing prospect in this group. All have them have a technical flaw that has to be corrected or a concern about their experience or level of competition. Quinton Coples and Melvin Ingram have generated buzz at times as potential top ten draft picks, but it’s highly unlikely that we’ll see a defensive end or rush linebacker taken in the first hour of the draft.
Interestingly, nearly every player teams will be considering in the early rounds has position versatility. And the back half of the first round is flush with hybrid teams on the prowl for versatile pass rushing prospects. It’s a deep draft at many positions, but there’s room for a run on this group in the first round.
The player comparisons, as always, should be taken as vague comments on body type and playing style rather than an expectation of their performance in the NFL. The situations will be much clearer for most of these players after the draft. Though loosely organized by expected draft position, these vignettes should give you an idea of how I value these players by talent. My first formal rookie fantasy rankings will not come until shortly after the draft.
Quinton Coples (6-6, 284) / UNC // 4-3 DE / 3-4 DE / 4-3 DT --
WATCH --
1st of three part RSP blog seriesCoples has been heavily scrutinized this year. He had a very productive junior season, then struggled to follow up with a strong senior performance. Coples suggested that he took one for the team by playing more defensive tackle, others pointed to inconsistent effort as the primary reason for his drop in sacks. After a dominant performance during Senior Bowl practices, Coples was again drawing comparisons to another UNC defensive end with impressive length and size (Julius Peppers). Coples compared himself to Jason Pierre-Paul at the Senior Bowl.
While Coples could become that caliber of player, he’ll need to work on his technique to get there. He gets off the ball very well, often beating his opponent with a quick first couple of strides. But he gets too high at times and struggles to establish a base against the run and has difficulty flattening out and finishing like an elite edge rusher. When he does maintain a consistent pad level, he’s a very good all-around end. He has a good bull rush and a dominant inside swim move when he’s able to control the offensive lineman. There’s room for him to grow into an edge rushing threat, but he’s not there yet.
He probably fits best as a 4-3 LDE, but he’s versatile enough to play on the weak side, shift inside to the 3-technique on passing downs or possibly play a 1-gap 3-4 defensive end role. Expect him to get a chance to contribute heavily immediately.
NFL comparison(s): a raw Julius Peppers, Calais Campbell
Expected Draft Round: Mid-late 1st
Melvin Ingram (6-1, 264) / South Carolina // 3-4 OLB / 4-3 DE --
WATCHIngram is a marvel. He looks like a fire hydrant, but moves like a running back. In fact, he was arguably the most impressive front seven player in lateral agility and change of direction drills at the Senior Bowl and the combine. He’s so agile that Alen Dumonjic had a Twitter debate over whether he could thrive as a new kind of Joker – one part seek-and-destroy 4-3 Will linebacker, one part zone blitzer extraordinaire, one part nickel Elephant.
If he was 1-2 inches taller or had arms that were 2-3 inches longer, he’d be far and away the best all-around prospect in this class. However, there are reasonable concerns that elite offensive tackles will be able to lock him up against the run and in pass rush and that his impressive edge rushing burst and spin counter won’t be consistent on Sundays because his length won’t allow him to gain separation.
I think he could be a productive 4-3 RDE, but will have a better chance at wreaking havoc as a 3-4 ROLB or hybrid front player. The current buzz suggests he’ll come off the board ahead of Coples. He should be an immediate starter wherever he lands.
NFL comparison(s): Adalius Thomas, less physical James Harrison
Expected Draft Round: Early-mid 1st
Fletcher Cox (6-4, 298) / Mississippi State // 4-3 DT / 3-4 DE / 4-3 DE --
WATCHIn the first month or two after the college season ended though the combine, the buzz at the defensive tackle position was all about Michael Brockers, Devon Still and Dontari Poe. But I thought Cox had the most consistently impressive game tape and am not at all surprised that his stock has been steadily rising over the past six weeks.
Cox is a biscuit under 300 pounds but looks and moves like a 4-3 DE on tape. He was used as a 4-3 NT, 4-3 DT, 3-4 DE and 4-3 DE at Mississippi State and was effective in every role. There are plays where he looks like a better edge rushing prospect than Coples and plays where he shows his potential as a dominating 3-technique. Like every other prospect in this group, though, he has a maddening tendency to get too high too quickly and get ridden out of plays. And he’s more of a flash penetrator than an instinctive, technician between the tackles.
I like Cox as a 1-gap player anywhere on the line. He’s athletic enough to overpower interior linemen and quick and strong enough to make plays as an end. His stock has continued to rise and he’s now generating discussion on whether he can be a top ten pick.
NFL comparison(s): part Corey Williams, part Darnell Dockett; very poor man’s Bryant Young
Expected Draft Round: Early-mid 1st
Dontari Poe (6-3, 346) / Memphis // 4-3 NT / 4-3 DT / 3-4 NT --
WATCHPoe is an enigma. He doesn't jump off the tape as a dominant DT worthy of a top 15 pick, but you can see the potential that's driving his draft buzz. He's more athletic than the 350 pound frame would suggest, but still handles a double team well. But he's not consistently explosive off the ball, doesn't consistently impact the run by plugging the middle or disrupting gaps and he doesn't always play to the whistle when a ball carrier breaks through the line. He doesn't show much in pass rush either.
Still, his frame and athletic measurables are going to push him into the top half of the first round. I think his best fit is as a penetrating 1-gap NT in either a 4-3 or 3-4 front, but he's athletic enough to play 3-technique, too. He's not likely to play on passing downs much; hopefully he'll have more consistent impact against the run as a base defensive anchor.
NFL comparison(s):Expected Draft Round: Early-Mid 1st
Michael Brockers (6-5, 322) / LSU // 4-3 DT / 3-4 DE --
WATCHBrockers has the size and athleticism that makes teams drool – and project raw talents to the height of their upside. Brockers has flashed enough talent to make scouts think he could become a dominant interior defender and I think he was a much more consistent player at the end of the year than the beginning. But while he’s shows good instincts in the run game and plays with a very effective pad level for a tall interior lineman, he doesn’t always play to his size. He’s more of a penetrating player than an anchor and doesn’t show the ability to win against double teams yet. He provides little pass rush, but that’s often a late developing skill for defensive linemen.
Brockers is a tantalizing prospect. He’s probably good enough to be a factor against the run as a 4-3 1-gapping DT right away. With further development, he could be dominant. He could also get looks as a 3-4 DE and be a versatile piece of a hybrid front. It’s possible that added responsibility could slow his development, however.
NFL comparison(s): John Henderson, possible upside of a stable Albert Haynesworth
Expected Draft Round: Early-mid 1st
Courtney Upshaw (6-2, 272) / Alabama // 3-4 OLB / 4-3 DE --
WATCHUpshaw is a much better football player than athlete. He looks stiff at times, doesn’t change direction well and isn’t a straight line speed, edge rushing player. But he plays with outstanding leverage, is instinctive and is a more savvy and coordinated pass rusher than he looks. He didn’t flash at the Senior Bowl as Coples and Ingram did, but he was just as effective in his own way.
I don’t think he would be a dominant 4-3 LDE, but he could succeed there. He’s probably a better fit as a 3-4 SOLB that is asked to play the run and pass rush more often than drop into coverage. He looks like he could fall to the bottom half of the first round, where he’ll be a steal if a contending team with a hybrid defense has him fall into their lap.
NFL comparison(s): more savvy, less athletic LaMarr Woodley
Expected Draft Round: Mid-late 1st
Whitney Mercilus (6-4, 261) / Illinois // 3-4 OLB / 4-3 DE --
WATCHSomething doesn’t add up for me with Mercilus. His frame in pads looks even better than the measurables suggest, but he was skinny and a little stiff out of pads during the combine drills I saw. He’s something of a one year wonder, but there’s some depth to his pass rushing ability. He’ll pursue well, but he’s slow to diagnose the run coming at him and struggles whether he’s blocked or not to set the edge correctly.
It’s hard to avoid the comparisons to Simeon Rice, another Illinois alum who played the run erratically on his way to the passer. I think I like Mercilus better as a 3-4 WOLB than a 4-3 end, but the frame is there to improve if his recognition skills against the run improve. I’m not sure I buy the late first round value, but it won’t be surprising to see him get drafted there.
NFL comparison(s): Everette Brown, a raw Simeon Rice
Expected Draft Round: Mid-late 1st
Nick Perry (6-3, 271) / USC // 4-3 DE / 3-4 OLB --
WATCHPerry will be on every team’s draft board, regardless of their defensive scheme. He doesn’t have a clear best fit. Certain aspects of his frame and playing style suggest a 3-4 OLB, others suggest a 4-3 end. Though he wasn’t used as a standup pass rusher at USC, he’s shown good athleticism for his frame and ran a 4.64 40 at the combine. His first step is good enough to win at the line of scrimmage and his closing speed is good, but he’ll need to improve his pad level and technique off the corner to convert his pressure numbers into sacks. Though he has the size and raw strength (35 reps on the bench) to succeed as an every-down defensive end, he doesn’t show much consistency in reading the run and getting off blocks.
Perry is probably most attractive as a 3-4 ROLB and it’ll be a surprise if he doesn’t come off the board to one of the many 3-4 teams in the second half of the first round.
NFL comparison(s): thicker Derrick Burgess, Andre Carter
Expected Draft Round: Late 1st
Jerel Worthy (6-2, 308) / Michigan State // 4-3 DT / 4-3 NT --
WATCHWorthy is extremely quick off the ball and at times is a full step ahead of anyone on either side of the line of scrimmage. He has the build of a 1-gap NT and flashed the ability to hold his ground against a double team, but is athletic enough to be disruptive in penetration. Instinctive against the run and works back to the ball effectively. Only an average pass rusher, but gets there on effort and penetration often enough to possibly be a factor on passing downs.
Brockers and Cox are going to get more attention, but Worthy should be a very nice pick later in the first round. It's rare to see a defensive tackle this quick off the ball and if Worthy can handle double teams effectively, he could be a force at either defensive tackle position.
NFL comparison(s):Expected Draft Round: Late 1st
Devon Still (6-5, 303) / Penn State // 4-3 DT --
WATCHStill was the consensus top defensive tackle last fall, but his stock has fallen in recent months after missing the Senior Bowl due to injury, concerns about his effort and senior tape and a strong group of early entrants combined to push him down draft boards.
If Still gets a quick jump off the ball, he can be dominant. He's rarely pushed backward, but often struggles to change direction. He has the hands and strength to shed and penetrate quickly, but if he has to turn back to make a play he can be turned, rode out or put on the ground. He's an average pass rusher, with his success based on his first step penetration rather than a set of refined pass rush moves.
I think Still has gotten a bit of a bum rap. He may not have the elite upside that the others in this deep class may have, but I think he's more consistent on tape than some give him credit. I don't think he'll hold up well enough against double teams to play over the center, but he should be a very good 1-gap tackle.
NFL comparison(s):Expected Draft Round: Late 1st - Early 2nd
Andre Branch (6-4, 259) / Clemson // 3-4 OLB / 4-3 DE --
WATCHBranch doesn’t have an elite first step but is quick enough in his first couple of steps to win against offensive tackles. Branch flattens better than most when he keeps his pad level low as his pass rush develops. He’s very good when he’s able to get up to straight line speed early in his rush move. Like so many others in this class, though, pad level can be a concern against the run. I think he’s a more consistent run defender than others in this class, however, and he seems underrated to me given the consensus that Mercilus currently carries a higher draft grade.
Branch is a true ‘tweener. There’s a lot of talk about him moving to 3-4 rush backer (and he looked pretty fluid on a zone blitz drop on one play I saw) but, like Robert Quinn and Jabaal Sheard and others before them, I think he may end up with a 4-3 team and do well. If his technique improves, I can see Trent Cole development and upside here.
NFL comparison(s): mix of Brian Orakpo and Jason Babin
Expected Draft Round: Late 1st – Early 2nd
Vinny Curry (6-3, 266) / Marshall // 4-3 DE / 3-4 OLB --
WATCHCurry probably won’t get drafted as highly as the others on this list, due to concerns about the level of competition he faced and his so-so combine measurable (which he vastly improved on during his pro day), but he belongs in the discussion. When he gets off the ball well, he is a very effective pass rusher with a high motor. When he doesn’t, he’s relatively easily blocked. The same issue plagues him against the run. He works hard to get free, but if he’s not initiating contact, he generally struggles.
I think Curry may project a little better as a rush OLB, but he has the potential to grow into a solid 4-3 end. I haven’t seen him mocked into the first round much. The second round seems to be his likely sweet spot.
NFL comparison(s): less polished Derrick Morgan
Expected Draft Round: Late 1st – Early 2nd
Others to watch:Shea McClellin (Boise State) continues to gain favor as an all-around DE/OLB prospect. He's a little undersized for an every-down 4-3 DE role, but is an underrated pass rusher from a three point stance. He also showed that he can play a 3-4 OLB or 4-3 SLB role at the Senior Bowl.
Jared Crick (Nebraska) hasn't gotten a lot of pre-draft run due to last season's injury, but he could be a less dynamic version of Justin Smith, JJ Watt and Calais Campbell as a 3-4 end with some pass rush upside.
Cam Johnson (Virginia) and
Malik Jackson (Tennessee) are solid, though not spectacular, all-around DE prospects.
Bruce Irvin is undersized and very likely to end up as a situational 3-4 OLB early, but has measurables that better most other first-step pass rushers on the board.
Chandler Jones (Syracuse) is going to get looks from lots of teams on the second day. I think he's more of a 4-3 end than 3-4 OLB.
This is an extremely deep defensive tackle class, peppered with guys who could play a swing 4-3 DT / 3-4 DE role in a hybrid scheme.
Brandon Thompson (Clemson) was very impressive at the Senior Bowl and will be a strong rotational run defender at worst.
Josh Chapman (Alabama) played with a torn ACL last season and could be a steal later in the draft.
Mike Martin (Michigan) is a physical specimen with a very high motor that could be a strong penetrating force in any scheme. Opinions vary on guys like
Kendall Reyes (Connecticut) and
Billy Winn (Boise State) but both have the size and all-around ability to be very attractive to a team with a hybrid front. Both can play arguably any position other than rush DE/OLB or 2-gap NT effectively.