7 replies to this topic

[Fantasyfollow1]

I have been offered Adrian Peterson (Minnesota) for A.J. Green. My league type, starting req's as well as my team and his are below. He is in a rebuild and so he only wants young players or picks. I only have picks 4.8, 4.10 and 5.10 left in this years draft. One thought is maybe I don't need Peterson with the backs I have. The other part of me wants to go after Peterson if I have the chance. I would be willing to offer possibly Ingram/S. Rice as a shot, but not much more. Thoughts? 10 team PPR dynasty. Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 RB/WR, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB/WR/TE, 1 DEF, 1K My team: QB: Rodgers, Flacco RB: CJ2K, Lynch, J. Stew, M. Ingram, C.J. Spiller, K. Hunter, B. Powell, WR: A.J. Green, J. Jones, W. Welker, M. Austin, S. Rice, E. Decker, R. Cobb, D. Nelson, R. Moss, A. Roberts, B. Lafell TE: A. Hernandez, K. Rudolph, M. Bennett, DEF: Pittsburgh K: A. Henery His Team: QB: S. Bradford, M. Flynn, K. Kolb, T. Jackson RB: AP, F. Jones, D. Thomas, K. Moreno, J. Starks, B. Scott, WR: G. jennings, D. Bryant, D. Thomas, Tampa Mike, M. Crabtree, E. Sanders, V. Brown, D. Hester, J. Gaffney TE: D. Keller, J. Cook, H. Miller DEF: Patriots, Redskins K: D. Carpenter

Edited by Fantasyfollow1, 10 April 2012 - 07:21 PM.

[jeter23]

Ingram/Rice is very fair. No way would I give up Green for Peterson.

[SpineDoc]

In a 10 team start one RB PPR, I like AJ Green better. For Ingram/Rice though sure.

[Fantasyfollow1]

Ingram/Rice is very fair. No way would I give up Green for Peterson.

No I am not even considering that. so you think it makes my team better. I am giving up a young talent in Ingram if I were to make this offer to add an older talent who may have 1-2 good years left. Could be buying very low on him as well though.

[jeter23]

Ingram/Rice is very fair. No way would I give up Green for Peterson.

No I am not even considering that. so you think it makes my team better. I am giving up a young talent in Ingram if I were to make this offer to add an older talent who may have 1-2 good years left. Could be buying very low on him as well though.

You can afford it. I might try Ingram even up first.

[Fantasyfollow1]

Ingram/Rice is very fair. No way would I give up Green for Peterson.

No I am not even considering that. so you think it makes my team better. I am giving up a young talent in Ingram if I were to make this offer to add an older talent who may have 1-2 good years left. Could be buying very low on him as well though.

You can afford it. I might try Ingram even up first.

O.K. offered Ingram/Rice. Ingram alone I think is too low.

[djmich]

Good lord, it is hard to gauge value with such short starting requirements. I'd do Ingram for Peterson if I was you in a heartbeat, with those starting requirements Ingram may never be startable. Personally, I think you should be packaging up to go after Calvin, Rice, McCoy.

[Fantasyfollow1]

Good lord, it is hard to gauge value with such short starting requirements. I'd do Ingram for Peterson if I was you in a heartbeat, with those starting requirements Ingram may never be startable. Personally, I think you should be packaging up to go after Calvin, Rice, McCoy.

I am confused. We can start as many few as 1 RB or as many as 3. We can start as few as 2 Wr's or as many as 4, and as few as 1 TE or as many as 2. Quite a bit of flexibility depending on how your team is composed. I don't get how the requirements are "short". Can someone explain to me, maybe I am not getting it. I think if Ingram improves he could start as a RB 3.

Edited by Fantasyfollow1, 11 April 2012 - 08:07 PM.