Would you rather have 1.04+1.06 or Ry.Mathews?
#1
Posted 13 April 2012 - 05:31 PM
#2
Posted 13 April 2012 - 05:32 PM
QB: Aaron Rodgers, Andy Dalton
RB:Beanie Wells, Michael Bush, Kendall Hunter, James Starks
WR: AJ Green, Torrey Smith, Laurent Robinson, Denarius Moore, Titus Young, Vincent Brown
TE: Rob Gronkowski, Aaron Hernandez, Kyle Rudolph, Kellen Winslow
K: Rackers
DEF: 49ers, Eagles
Rookie picks: 1, 6, 9, 11, 14, 20, 24 30
#3
Posted 13 April 2012 - 05:36 PM
I would rather have Mathews. He just looks like an upcoming stud
Reservoir Dogs Dynasty League 2009,2010, 2011 and 2012 champion. 4-peat!
start 2 qbs,2 rbs, 3wrs, 1 te, 2 flex (rb/wr/te), 3 dl, 4 lbs, 4dbs
QBs: Brees,C.Newton, Palmer, Ponder Stafford, Tannehill
RBs: ,A. Foster, Charles Gore, ,R.Jennings , MJD,, mcgahee, Moreno, Rainy, JStew, David Wilson
WRs:m. austin, Dez Bryant v. brown, Fitzgerald, Givens, Andre johnson, B.Marshall, Den. Moore, Wright
TEs: Allen, Graham, J., Celek, Pitta
DL:,Long, Ngata, sheard, Suggs, Wake
LB: Ayers, Dansby, Fletcher, D. Johnson McCarthy, , Posluszny, Washington D, P. Willis
DBs: burnett, Harper, , L. Landry, Goldshon, w.moore, williams
#4
Posted 13 April 2012 - 05:42 PM
#5
Posted 13 April 2012 - 05:48 PM
HHS Secretary Kathleen SEBELIUS: There also is no abortifacient drug that is part of the FDA approved contraception. What the rule for preventive care…
(R-PA) Rep. Tim MURPHY: Ma’m that is not true…Is the morning after pill or something like that an abortifacient drug?
SEBELIUS: It is a contraceptive drug, not an abortifacient… It does not interfere with a pregnancy. If the morning pill were taken, and a female were pregnant, the pregnancy is not interrupted. That’s the definition of abortifation.
MURPHY: Ma’m that is your interpretation, and I appreciate that’s your interpretation.
SEBELIUS: That’s what the scientists and doctors…
MURPHY: We’re not talking about scientists. Ma’m we’re not talking about scientists here, we’re talking about religious belief.
Is this just math that you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better?
#6
Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:41 PM
12 Team Dynasty PPR/IDP League 1QB, 2RB, 3WR, 1Flex, 1TE; 1DL, 2LB's, 1DB, 1Flex
QB: D.Brees, J. Freeman, Vick
RB: J. Charles, A. Morris, R. Matthews, A.Brown, M. Ingram, D. Thomas, S Vereen, R. Hillman,J. Best,
WR: Julio Jones, Dez Bryant, M.Wallace Wes Welker, Kenny Britt, S. Hill,
TE: J. Finley, Jared Cook,
LB: D. Bishop, D. Washington, Colin McCarthy, Sean lee, Donald Butler, Phillip Wheeler
DL: G. Hardy, T. Cole, C. Jordan
DB: C.Finnegan
#7
Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:59 PM
The Bruins should do the right thing and just forfeit the series.
If they want to save themselves a beatdown, yes
#8
Posted 13 April 2012 - 08:02 PM
#9
Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:21 AM
#10
Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:50 AM
I think you'e thinking of Ryan Williams instead of Ryan Matthews.I was reading this thread and thinking "Wow, I'm not nearly as high on Williams as the folks in this thread". Then I went two threads down and there's a post full of people saying Williams is worth a late 1st/early 2nd, which is the neighborhood I'd put him in. Funny how the opinions can vary like that...
#11
Posted 14 April 2012 - 08:04 AM
That's a pretty fair trade.
Have to imagine that I would take Luck/RG3 + Martin and be very happy with it.
I would want Ryan right now, but if I kept doing trades like this for a dynasty team and taking the Luck+Martin type of options I would be a juggernaut over time.
Even if I ended up with Blackmon/Floyd plus Martin, I wouldn't complain.
#12
Posted 14 April 2012 - 09:18 AM
Good chance one of the 2 is a bust and the other isn't as good as Mathews. But if you really don't like Mathews and that's the best you can get, I could see it.
That's a pretty fair trade.
Have to imagine that I would take Luck/RG3 + Martin and be very happy with it.
I would want Ryan right now, but if I kept doing trades like this for a dynasty team and taking the Luck+Martin type of options I would be a juggernaut over time.
Fixed
Even if I ended up with Blackmon/Floyd plus Martin, I wouldn't complain.
#13
Posted 14 April 2012 - 11:10 AM
i wouldnt trade richardson for matthewsmathews=1.01. would you trade TRich for that?
#14
Posted 14 April 2012 - 11:17 AM
???????????? Could I please see your magic future telling crystal ball? If I could predict the future like that I would be a billionaire from the stock market.Good chance one of the 2 is a bust and the other isn't as good as Mathews. But if you really don't like Mathews and that's the best you can get, I could see it.
That's a pretty fair trade.
Have to imagine that I would take Luck/RG3 + Martin and be very happy with it.
I would want Ryan right now, but if I kept doing trades like this for a dynasty team and taking the Luck+Martin type of options I would be a juggernaut over time.
Fixed
Even if I ended up with Blackmon/Floyd plus Martin, I wouldn't complain.
#15
Posted 14 April 2012 - 11:58 AM
You would want more than getting Mathews for your 1.04+1.06 ? I think getting Mathews for those picks is as about as cheap as you would land him for right now considering where he is being drafted. Mathews is being drafted in the late 1st/early 2nd of start up drafts and rookie picks 1.04 and 1.06 are being taken in the 4th-6th roundsI'd want more, but it's a respectable offer.
2012 NFFC Online Champion ($100,000 winner) (1872 teams)
2012 NFFC Online 4th Place ($10,000 winner) (1872 teams)
Charleston Chimeras 1998 1999 2003 2005 2006 2009 2010 Champions (Dynasty 1997-2012)
Charlotte Cobras 2010 2012 Champions (Dynasty 2010-2012)
Colorado Vipers 1991 1996 2003 Champions (ReDraft 1990-2012)
Minnesota Muskrats 1995 1998 2000 2001 2006 2007 2009 Champions (ReDraft 1994-2012)
Blue Dragons 2012 2nd Place ($750 FFPC Dynasty 2012)
Wyverns 2012 2nd Place ($500 FFPC Dynasty 2012)
Gryphons 2012 2nd Place ($750 FFP Dynasty 2011-2012)
Dragons ($750 FFPC Dynasty 2010-2012)
Vesper Lynds (16 team Dynasty 2012)
#16
Posted 14 April 2012 - 01:15 PM
#17
Posted 14 April 2012 - 03:24 PM
Not sure I understand your point. Take a look at the stats -- many 1st round picks bust. Montaro Hardesty, Mikel LeShoure were both going around 1.05 in drafts... do you think either will become a "stud?" It's not predicting the future as much as accepting that any rookie pick, even a first rounder, carries a certain amount of risk. Odds are some 1st rounders will bust, although I do like this draft class more than most.???????????? Could I please see your magic future telling crystal ball? If I could predict the future like that I would be a billionaire from the stock market.
Good chance one of the 2 is a bust and the other isn't as good as Mathews. But if you really don't like Mathews and that's the best you can get, I could see it.
That's a pretty fair trade.
Have to imagine that I would take Luck/RG3 + Martin and be very happy with it.
I would want Ryan right now, but if I kept doing trades like this for a dynasty team and taking the Luck+Martin type of options I would be a juggernaut over time.
Fixed
Even if I ended up with Blackmon/Floyd plus Martin, I wouldn't complain.
#18
Posted 14 April 2012 - 05:40 PM
#19
Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:37 PM
#20
Posted 14 April 2012 - 09:34 PM
Common sense from past drafts. A lot of players are busts and very, very few are studs. So it's playing the odds and being realistic. Relax bud.???????????? Could I please see your magic future telling crystal ball? If I could predict the future like that I would be a billionaire from the stock market.
Good chance one of the 2 is a bust and the other isn't as good as Mathews. But if you really don't like Mathews and that's the best you can get, I could see it.
That's a pretty fair trade.
Have to imagine that I would take Luck/RG3 + Martin and be very happy with it.
I would want Ryan right now, but if I kept doing trades like this for a dynasty team and taking the Luck+Martin type of options I would be a juggernaut over time.
Fixed
Even if I ended up with Blackmon/Floyd plus Martin, I wouldn't complain.
#21
Posted 14 April 2012 - 11:57 PM
Common sense from past drafts. A lot of players are busts and very, very few are studs. So it's playing the odds and being realistic. Relax bud.
???????????? Could I please see your magic future telling crystal ball? If I could predict the future like that I would be a billionaire from the stock market.
Good chance one of the 2 is a bust and the other isn't as good as Mathews. But if you really don't like Mathews and that's the best you can get, I could see it.
That's a pretty fair trade.
Have to imagine that I would take Luck/RG3 + Martin and be very happy with it.
I would want Ryan right now, but if I kept doing trades like this for a dynasty team and taking the Luck+Martin type of options I would be a juggernaut over time.
Fixed
Even if I ended up with Blackmon/Floyd plus Martin, I wouldn't complain.
I dont know what is crazier, him thinking 4/6 is a good return for Matthews, or that he thinks its possible to land Blackmon and Floyd at 4/6, haha
#22
Posted 15 April 2012 - 06:48 AM
#23
Posted 15 April 2012 - 08:56 AM
I post for two reasons, 1) hopefully to help the guy who made the OP, and 2) to have my posts to be critiqued (good or bad). I have a list of posters that I respect, and I highly value their critique of my opinions because they have provided insights/opinions that have helped me become better at playing fantasy football.
Common sense from past drafts. A lot of players are busts and very, very few are studs. So it's playing the odds and being realistic. Relax bud.
???????????? Could I please see your magic future telling crystal ball? If I could predict the future like that I would be a billionaire from the stock market.
Good chance one of the 2 is a bust and the other isn't as good as Mathews. But if you really don't like Mathews and that's the best you can get, I could see it.
That's a pretty fair trade.
Have to imagine that I would take Luck/RG3 + Martin and be very happy with it.
I would want Ryan right now, but if I kept doing trades like this for a dynasty team and taking the Luck+Martin type of options I would be a juggernaut over time.
Fixed
Even if I ended up with Blackmon/Floyd plus Martin, I wouldn't complain.
I dont know what is crazier, him thinking 4/6 is a good return for Matthews, or that he thinks its possible to land Blackmon and Floyd at 4/6, haha
I am more concerned about the logic behind a critique/insight/option, than the response itself.
Just for the record, I do know that any rookie can bust, but the other poster response was projecting which rookie may bust, anyone can speculate on subjective issues, so where is the logic there?
Also, my other post was misinterpreted, I was saying a choice of Blackmon or Floyd with the fourth pick plus Martin with the sixth pick. I would gladly take that combination in trade for Ryan Matthews, as long as I am not a strong contender for the league title.
Since this discussion has degenerated into something not fruitful, I am not wasting my time here. Real life is too busy to deal with misinterpretations and vague responses that criticize others.
#24
Posted 16 April 2012 - 05:43 AM
#25
Posted 17 April 2012 - 11:03 AM
MOX Super Flex 2: 0-0
MOX Super Flex 4: 0-0
PDFFL: 0-0
Ashes of 27: 0-0
Fantasy Champs: 0-0
#26
Posted 17 April 2012 - 06:36 PM
#27
Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:20 PM
Reservoir Dogs Dynasty League 2009,2010, 2011 and 2012 champion. 4-peat!
start 2 qbs,2 rbs, 3wrs, 1 te, 2 flex (rb/wr/te), 3 dl, 4 lbs, 4dbs
QBs: Brees,C.Newton, Palmer, Ponder Stafford, Tannehill
RBs: ,A. Foster, Charles Gore, ,R.Jennings , MJD,, mcgahee, Moreno, Rainy, JStew, David Wilson
WRs:m. austin, Dez Bryant v. brown, Fitzgerald, Givens, Andre johnson, B.Marshall, Den. Moore, Wright
TEs: Allen, Graham, J., Celek, Pitta
DL:,Long, Ngata, sheard, Suggs, Wake
LB: Ayers, Dansby, Fletcher, D. Johnson McCarthy, , Posluszny, Washington D, P. Willis
DBs: burnett, Harper, , L. Landry, Goldshon, w.moore, williams
#28
Posted 18 April 2012 - 01:43 PM
#29
Posted 19 April 2012 - 09:52 AM
Garbage. It was said that the guy will pick up 2 and both will be good players. This isn't remotely true. A lot of people fall in love with rookie picks, especially this time of year. I don't want to link to an external site but I've seen an analysis of the last 7 years of picks. Getting a stud player is very rare and out of 2 picks, yes, basically one will be a bust on average. You either need both guys to be quite good or 1 of them to be a real stud and a better player than Mathews. Anyone saying that you get 2 picks and are guaranteed 2 very high quality players is kidding themself and it's bad advice.I post for two reasons, 1) hopefully to help the guy who made the OP, and 2) to have my posts to be critiqued (good or bad). I have a list of posters that I respect, and I highly value their critique of my opinions because they have provided insights/opinions that have helped me become better at playing fantasy football.
Common sense from past drafts. A lot of players are busts and very, very few are studs. So it's playing the odds and being realistic. Relax bud.
???????????? Could I please see your magic future telling crystal ball? If I could predict the future like that I would be a billionaire from the stock market.
Good chance one of the 2 is a bust and the other isn't as good as Mathews. But if you really don't like Mathews and that's the best you can get, I could see it.
That's a pretty fair trade.
Have to imagine that I would take Luck/RG3 + Martin and be very happy with it.
I would want Ryan right now, but if I kept doing trades like this for a dynasty team and taking the Luck+Martin type of options I would be a juggernaut over time.
Fixed
Even if I ended up with Blackmon/Floyd plus Martin, I wouldn't complain.
I dont know what is crazier, him thinking 4/6 is a good return for Matthews, or that he thinks its possible to land Blackmon and Floyd at 4/6, haha
I am more concerned about the logic behind a critique/insight/option, than the response itself.
Just for the record, I do know that any rookie can bust, but the other poster response was projecting which rookie may bust, anyone can speculate on subjective issues, so where is the logic there?
Also, my other post was misinterpreted, I was saying a choice of Blackmon or Floyd with the fourth pick plus Martin with the sixth pick. I would gladly take that combination in trade for Ryan Matthews, as long as I am not a strong contender for the league title.
Since this discussion has degenerated into something not fruitful, I am not wasting my time here. Real life is too busy to deal with misinterpretations and vague responses that criticize others.
I see no logic to anything you've said and you've kind of thrown a hissy fit for no reason at all.
Edited by voiceofunreason, 19 April 2012 - 10:06 AM.
#30
Posted 19 April 2012 - 10:04 AM
#31
Posted 19 April 2012 - 10:20 AM
#32
Posted 19 April 2012 - 10:26 AM
Edited by sspunisher, 19 April 2012 - 10:30 AM.
#33
Posted 19 April 2012 - 08:24 PM
Free Fantasy Football and Baseball Aggregator for Player News, Articles, Strategies, Advice, Sleepers, Rankings, Prospects, and Twitter
Follow the fantasy action at http://www.FantasyLeagueGM.com
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










